Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 1;20(2):1158–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2025.01.020

Table 3.

Marginal bone level (MBL), changes in MBL and average bone to implant contact ratio comparison between customized abutment group and prefabricated abutment group.

Baseline Loading 1Y 3Y 5Y
MBL Mean ± SD (mm)

CA (n = 36) 0.4 ± 0.52 0.61 ± 0.62 0.84 ± 0.71 0.83 ± 0.67 0.91 ± 0.79
PA (n = 28) 0.3 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.45 0.66 ± 0.59 0.78 ± 0.55 0.87 ± 0.64
P Value
0.43
0.94
0.28
0.72
0.83
Changes in MBL Mean ± SD (mm)

CA (n = 36) 0.21 ± 0.31 0.45 ± 0.47 0.43 ± 0.45 0.51 ± 0.66
PA (n = 28) 0.29 ± 0.38 0.36 ± 0.43 0.47 ± 0.45 0.57 ± 0.51
P Value

0.32
0.45
0.74
0.71
Average BIC Mean ± SD (%)
CA (n = 36) 96.05 ± 5.23 94 ± 6.25 91.71 ± 7.03 91.79 ± 6.74 91 ± 8.05
PA (n = 28) 97.14 ± 3.92 94.35 ± 4.31 93.72 ± 5.71 92.6 ± 5.45 91.73 ± 6.33
P Value 0.37 0.8 0.22 0.61 0.7

MBL: marginal bone level, BIC: bone-to-implant contact ratio, CA: customized abutment, PA: prefabricated abutment, 1Y: 1-year after loading, 3Y: 3-year after loading, 5Y: 5-year after loading.