Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):103311. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.103311

Table 2.

Comparison of background demographics between the two groups, n (%)


Double-stent group (n = 40)
Single-stent group (n = 38)
P value
Sex, male/female, n 20/20 16/22 0.4841
Age, mean ± SD, years 73 ± 11 71 ± 12 0.3332
Hypertension 12 (30.0) 17 (44.7) 0.1781
Diabetes 14 (35.0) 12 (31.6) 0.7491
Diagnostic method 0.0141
    Biopsy 21 (52.5) 30 (78.9) -
    Imaging 19 (47.5) 8 (21.1) -
Tumor location 0.3421
    Head 37 (92.5) 35 (92.1) -
    Neck 1 (2.5) 2 (5.3) -
    Body 2 (5.0) 0 (0.0) -
    Tail 0 (0.0) 1 (2.6) -
Tumor staging 0.6871
    III stage 27 (67.5) 24 (63.2) -
    IV stage 13 (32.5) 14 (36.8) -
    Chemotherapy 16 (40.0) 11 (28.9) 0.3341
Analgesic > 0.999
    None 23 (57.5) 23 (60.5) -
    Nonopioid analgesic 16 (40.0) 15 (39.5) -
    Moderate opioid 1 (2.5) 0 (0.0) -
    Strong opioids 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) -
1

χ 2 test.

2

Student’s t-test.

The double-stent group underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with a fully-covered self-expandable metallic biliary stent and a pancreatic duct stent, while the single-stent group underwent a fully-covered self-expandable metallic biliary stent only.