Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 1;13:1559555. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1559555

TABLE 5.

Percentage differences between (1) peak power values obtained for unilateral chewing (PP WUi , PP NUi ) and symmetrical incisal biting (PP Wii , PP NIi ), on the working side (ΔPP WUIi ) and non-working side (ΔPP NUIi ) and (2) total peak power (ΔPP UIi ) obtained for unilateral chewing (PP TUi ) and symmetrical incisal biting (PP TIi ), depending on the food type (i).

Working side (W) Non-working side (N) Total Power [W] Percentage difference [%]
Power [W] Percentage difference [%] Power [W] Percentage difference [%]
Unilateral chewing Symmetric incisal biting Unilateral chewing Symmetric incisal biting
PP WUi b PP WIi c ΔPP WUIi PP NUi b PP WIi c ΔPP NUIi PP TUi d PP TIi e ΔPP UIi
Sausage (s)
3.33 0.72 128.8 2.30 0.72 104.6 5.62 1.44 118.5
Carrot (c)
6.82 1.39 132.3 5.19 1.39 115.5 12.01 2.78 124.8
Apple (a)
0.93 0.44 71.7 0.80 0.44 58.6 1.74 0.88 65.5
Chocolate bar (b)
2.36 0.60 119.0 2.10 0.60 111.0 4.46 1.20 115.2
Chocolate (d)
1.98 1.05 61.2 1.62 1.05 42.7 3.60 2.10 52.5
a

i = s, c, a, b and d.

b

(Table 1).

c

The authors’ own unpublished data for this paper.

d

PP TUi = PP WUi + PP NUi .

e

PP TIi = PP WIi + PP NIi .