Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 2002 May;9(3):627–632. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.9.3.627-632.2002

Cloning and Expression of a Helicobacter bilis Immunoreactive Protein

Sunlian Feng 1, Emir Hodzic 1, Lon V Kendall 1, Amy Smith 1, Kimberly Freet 1, Stephen W Barthold 1,*
PMCID: PMC119999  PMID: 11986271

Abstract

In an effort to identify immunoreactive Helicobacter bilis antigens with potential for serodiagnosis, sera from mice experimentally infected with H. bilis were used to screen an H. bilis genomic DNA expression library. Among 17 immunoreactive clones, several contained sequences that encoded a predicted 167-kDa protein (P167). Five overlapping P167 peptides (P167A to P167E) of approximately 40 kDa each were generated and tested. Immune sera reacted with fragments P167C and P167D at dilutions of 1:1,600 and 1:6,400, respectively, and reacted with an H. bilis membrane extract at a dilution of 1:800 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Sera from mice experimentally infected with H. hepaticus did not react with P167C and P167D. Sera from mice naturally infected with H. bilis but not sera from mice naturally infected with H. hepaticus reacted with P167C and P167D. Hyperimmune sera against P167C peptide reacted with recombinant P167C and with a 120-kDa band in H. bilis lysates but did not react with a protein of the same size on immunoblots prepared from H. hepaticus, H. muridarum, or unrelated Borrelia burgdorferi and Campylobacter jejuni whole-cell lysates. Nevertheless, the P167A, P167B, P167C, and P167D primers, but not the P167E primers, amplified DNA from H. hepaticus, and all five primer sets amplified DNA from H. muridarum. These results suggest that P167 is an immunodominant, H. bilis-specific antigen that may have potential for use in serodiagnosis.


Helicobacter bilis (11) is a member of an expanding and genetically diverse group of enterohepatic, commensal, and opportunistic Helicobacter species that infect laboratory mice. In addition to H. bilis, Helicobacter species isolated from mice include H. hepaticus (8), H. rodentium (27), H. muridarum (19), H. typhlonicus (13), and others yet to be named (30). Flexispira rappini, first described by Bryner et al. (2), has also been shown to be a Helicobacter species (22, 24, 32), but recent studies suggest that it represents a mixture of Helicobacter species (3). H. bilis infections have been found to be widespread among research mouse colonies (11, 23). Infections are often subclinical but can produce liver and enteric diseases in some genotypes of mice, particularly mice with immune deficiencies. H. bilis was isolated initially from aged inbred mice with chronic hepatitis and hepatomas in 1995 (11) and then subsequently from SCID mice that had enteritis and that were coinfected with H. rodentium (28). Experimental inoculation of H. bilis induces enteritis and hepatitis in SCID mice (12, 29) and enteric disease in athymic rats (16). Genomic alterations of mice can have both intentional and unpredicted immune perturbations that enhance the pathogenicity of these opportunistic pathogens. In addition to infecting mice, H. bilis has been isolated from dogs, gerbils, rats, and cats (14), and its DNA has been amplified from bile and gall bladders of humans with cholecystitis (7).

For these reasons, there is a need for serodiagnostic assays that are both specific and sensitive. Currently available serologic assays for detecting Helicobacter infection in mouse populations have relied on either bacterial lysates (9, 10, 33) or various types of membrane antigen preparations (14, 21, 34). Both are antigenically complex, with cross-reactive antigens causing a lack of specificity (34). In addition, these antigen preparations generally detect only low titers of serum reactivity in naturally infected mice and are not useful for detecting early stages of infection (9, 10, 21). Both fecal culturing and PCR have been shown to detect infection several weeks before positive membrane antigen seroconversion in sequentially sampled, experimentally H. bilis-infected mice (17). Recently, an H. hepaticus recombinant immunogenic protein (MAP18) was cloned and expressed (20). It proved to be H. hepaticus specific but less sensitive than a membrane antigen extract (20). No recombinant proteins of H. bilis have been characterized. In this report, we describe a novel recombinant H. bilis gene product that is immunodominant and specific for H. bilis and that has potential for further characterization as a serodiagnostic antigen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice.

Virus antibody- and Helicobacter-free C3H/HeN (C3H) and C3H/Smn.CIcrHsd-scid (C3H-scid) mice were purchased at 3 to 5 weeks of age from the National Cancer Institute Animal Production Program, Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, Md. (C3H) or Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind. (C3H-scid). Upon arrival, fecal pellets from all mice were tested for Helicobacter by culturing (see below) and PCR (17, 26). Mice were maintained in a pathogen-free room with restricted access on a 12-h light-12-h dark cycle. They were fed irradiated Pico Lab Mouse Diet 20 (PMI Nutrition International, Inc., Brentwood, Mo.). Mice were killed with CO2 narcosis. The University of California laboratory animal care program is fully AAALAC accredited, and this study was reviewed and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. All procedures and treatment of mice were in compliance with the Public Health Service Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Bacterial culturing and isolation.

H. bilis (ATCC 51630), H. hepaticus (ATCC 51448), and H. muridarum (ATCC 49282) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and cloned by threefold limiting dilution as described previously (17). The species identity of each clonal population was verified by PCR (17). To determine H. bilis infection in mice, freshly pooled fecal pellets were processed and cultured in brucella broth as described previously (17). Isolates were verified as H. bilis by PCR with H. bilis-specific 16S ribosomal DNA primers (23). For DNA extraction and PCR amplification from feces, samples were processed as described previously (26). Assays included negative controls from uninfected mice, and H. bilis genomic DNA served as a positive control. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto cN40 was cultured in modified Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly medium at 33°C as described previously (6). Campylobacter jejuni was a gift from S. Jang, University of California, Davis.

Immune sera and antisera.

H. bilis was grown under microaerobic conditions in brucella broth for 3 days at 37°C as described previously (17). Bacteria were adjusted to 108 CFU per ml, and 0.1 ml was inoculated intraperitoneally into 3- to 5-week-old C3H-scid mice as described previously (17). Once infection was established (4 to 8 weeks after inoculation) and confirmed by fecal PCR, the mice were killed and livers were collected. Liver tissue containing host-adapted H. bilis was homogenized in 10 ml of brucella broth, and then 0.25 ml of the homogenate was inoculated by gavage into C3H mice. Infection status was monitored weekly by fecal PCR and culturing. At 6 months after infection, blood was collected and sera were harvested from infection-positive mice.

Sera were also obtained and tested from naturally infected C3H mice. The mice were 12 to 14 weeks old when blood was collected. Identification of the infecting Helicobacter species was performed by fecal PCR with Helicobacter genus-specific primers (1) followed by restriction enzyme digestion of PCR amplicons to differentiate H. hepaticus from H. bilis (23). Briefly, a fresh fecal pellet was collected and suspended in 1.0 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The fecal suspension was centrifuged at 700 × g for 5 min, and 60 μl of the suspension was combined with 140 μl of PBS. Purified DNA from the fecal supernatant was obtained by using the Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit protocol for blood (1). Following PCR amplification with Helicobacter genus-specific primers, amplicons were digested separately with restriction enzymes MboI and HhaI and analyzed by gel electrophoresis.

Hyperimmune antisera to recombinant proteins were generated in C3H mice by subcutaneous injection of 20 μg of recombinant protein in 0.1 ml of Freund's complete adjuvant, followed by two boosts of 10 μg of protein each in incomplete Freund's adjuvant at 2-week intervals. Sera were collected and tested by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the antibody reactivity of antisera was verified at a serum dilution of 1:100,000.

Native bacterial antigens.

To prepare whole-cell lysates, broth cultures of H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. muridarum, B. burgdorferi, and C. jejuni were pelleted by centrifugation, washed with cold PBS, and then sonicated to lyse cells. Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) was added to the lysates, and the mixtures were stored at −20°C. The membrane antigen extract of H. bilis was prepared as described previously (21). Briefly, bacteria were incubated for 2 days at 37°C in brucella broth with 5% fetal calf serum on a shaker. Bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed with PBS, resuspended in PBS with 1% n-octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (Sigma Diagnostics, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.) to release membrane proteins, and then centrifuged to remove insoluble proteins. The supernatants were dialyzed to remove detergent.

H. bilis genomic DNA expression library.

Genomic DNA was isolated from H. bilis, and 200 μg of DNA was shipped to Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., to construct a λZAP II H. bilis genomic DNA expression library. The λ ZAP II phage contains pBluescript that can be excised and cloned directly with ExAssist helper phage (Stratagene). The library was screened with immune sera from H. bilis-infected mice. Immune sera were preabsorbed with Escherichia coli phage lysates to remove background reactivity. Immunoreactive clones were obtained by routine procedures as described previously (4). DNA sequencing was performed at the W. M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory at the Yale University School of Medicine. The DNA sequence was analyzed by using the MacVector program (Kodak, New Haven, Conn.).

Expression and purification of recombinant proteins.

The primers for the P167A DNA fragment corresponded to nucleotides 58 to 81 and 1102 to 1123 of the P167 gene. The primers for P167B were from 856 to 876 and from 1942 to 1962. The primers for P167C were from 1645 to 1668 and from 2776 to 2799. The primers for P167D were from 2560 to 2583 and from 3655 to 3675. Finally, the primers for P167E were from 3409 to 3432 and from 4609 to 4632 of the P167 gene. These primer sequences are summarized in Table 1. DNA from the original reactive clone was used as a template. Amplified P167A to P167E DNA fragments were cloned in frame with the glutathione S-transferase gene into pMX, a pGEX-2T vector (Pharmacia, Pistacaway, N.J.) with a modified polylinker (25). The PCR-amplified DNA sequences of the recombinant DNA were confirmed by sequence comparison with the original inserts. Recombinant proteins were purified on glutathione columns and freed of their glutathione S-transferase fusion partners by thrombin cleavage as described previously (4).

TABLE 1.

Primer sets for five P167 fragments (P167A to P167E)

Primer Nucleotides corresponding to the P167 gene Sequence
P167A forward 58-81 TATGCTGGGGATATTCAAGGCGAT
P167A reverse 1102-1123 ATTGACATGTATCCAGCTACC
P167B forward 856-876 ATAGATGATGGCAGTAGCACC
P167B reverse 942-1962 TGCTATCTCATCACCACTCAT
P167C forward 1645-1668 CGTATGGGTGAGATTAAGCATGTC
P167C reverse 2776-2799 TGAGCCTATGCCATTTTCTACTAC
P167D forward 2560-2583 AGCTACACTTACACACAAGGGGAT
P167D reverse 3655-3675 ATCTGTTACTCCATTGTTTGC
P167E forward 3409-3432 CGTCTAGCAAGAGTAGCTAGCATT
P167E reverse 4609-4632 ATTGGTGGTAGGGTTGTGTTTTAG

Immunoblotting.

Four micrograms of membrane extract lysate or recombinant protein was resolved in sodium dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. For dot blots, a Bio-Dot microfiltration apparatus (Bio-Rad) was used to transfer proteins to nitrocellulose membranes, and the protocol from the manufacture was modified as described below. A sheet of Bio-Rad Trans-Blot transfer medium nitrocellulose paper (9 by 12 cm) was soaked for 10 min in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and then blotted with Whatman paper to dry. One hundred microliters of TBS was applied to each well to rewet the membrane, and then a vacuum was applied to the apparatus to remove the TBS. Proteins were diluted in TBS at 10 μg/ml, and 100 μl was added to each well. The TBS was allowed to pass through the nitrocellulose by gravity filtration. Once all the TBS had filtered through the nitrocellulose, the unit was disassembled and the nitrocellulose membranes were processed as immunoblots. Membranes were probed with immune sera (or uninfected normal mouse sera) diluted 1:100 and then labeled with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G secondary antibody diluted 1:4,500 (Sigma).

ELISA.

For the ELISA, 100 μl of 1 μg of membrane extract lysate or recombinant protein/ml in carbonate coating buffer (0.2 g of NaN3, 1.59 g of Na2CO3, and 2.93 g of NaHCO3 in 1 liter of distilled H2O [pH 9.6]) was plated in 96-well plates as described previously (6). Duplicate samples of each mouse serum, including uninfected normal mouse serum as a control, were diluted 1:200 for probing. The secondary antibody was alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G diluted 1:5,000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, Pa.). The enzyme substrate was p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma). The optical densities at 405 nm were read on a Kinetic microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The mean absorbance for duplicate experimental samples, as well as the mean absorbance and standard deviation for a minimum of six wells containing uninfected normal mouse serum, was calculated. Antibodies were considered present when the absorbance exceeded 3 standard deviations of the mean titer of the control (uninfected) mouse serum.

Amplification of P167A to P167E DNA fragments from genomic DNAs by PCR.

Genomic DNAs were purified from H. bilis, H. hepaticus, H. muridarum, B. burgdorferi, and C. jejuni as previously described (5). Each genomic DNA was used as a template separately, and each set of primers for P167A to P167E (described above) was used for each reaction. DNA was denatured at 94°C for 1 min, annealed at 55°C for 1 min, and extended at 72°C for 1 min. This process was repeated for 30 cycles. Amplicons were analyzed by gel electrophoresis.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The sequences of P167 and P158 have been submitted to the GenBank nucleotide sequence database under accession numbers AF288477 and AF349728, respectively.

RESULTS

Immune sera obtained from mice that were experimentally infected with H. bilis at 6 months after gavage inoculation reacted to H. bilis membrane antigen extract in an ELISA at a dilution of 1:800. Immunoblots with the membrane antigen extract revealed reactivity of 6-month immune sera against 5 major bands with approximate molecular masses of 15, 30, 40, 50, and 60 kDa and 18 minor bands ranging from 10 to 100 kDa (Fig. 1). These results confirmed that sera from experimentally infected mice were reactive against a number of H. bilis antigens.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Immunoblots of an H. bilis membrane extract and recombinant proteins probed with H. bilis or H. hepaticus immune sera. Lane 1, H. bilis membrane extract probed with H. bilis immune serum. Lane 2, P167C probed with H. bilis immune serum. The asterisk indicates P167C, and the lower bands are probably degraded products of P167C. Lane 3, P167C probed with H. hepaticus immune serum. Lane 4, P167D probed with H. bilis immune serum. The asterisk indicates P167D, and the lower bands are probably degraded products of P167D. Lane 5, P167D probed with H. hepaticus immune serum.

The H. bilis genomic DNA expression library was then probed with 6-month immune sera. Seventeen immunoreactive clones were obtained and sequenced. One clone contained a 4,633-bp open reading frame, and the predicted molecular mass of the gene product (P167) was 167 kDa. The open reading frame contained typical bacterial −10 (TTGTAA) and −35 (TATAAA) potential promoters and a ribosome binding site (AAAAGAG) in the 5′-flanking region, a stop codon, and a translation terminator (a hairpin structure) in the 3′-flanking region. Another clone contained a gene encoding a product (P158) with a predicted molecular mass of 158 kDa. This gene had a fragment of 2,877 bp from bp 1490 to 4366 corresponding to bp 1756 to 4633 bp in the P167 gene. The P158 gene is 4,366 bp long and is 267 bp shorter than the P167 gene at the 5′ end. Its first 1,100 bp share very little, if any, homology with the P167 gene. The middle section, from bp1101 to 1489, shares 52% identity with its counterpart in the P167 gene, and its 3′ section is 100% identical to that of the P167 gene. Among the 17 different immunoreactive clones, 13 were determined to contain either P167 or P158: 5 clones contained the complete sequence of P167; 6 clones contained partial sequences of P167; and 2 clones contained the complete sequence of P158. The remaining four clones reacted with antiserum to P167C. Therefore, they were not sequenced. These results suggest that one or both of these proteins (P167 and P158) are dominant immunoreactive antigens during H. bilis infection. A BLAST search did not reveal any significant homologue to P167, and its biological function is unknown.

Because the majority of clones contained the P167 gene, we focused on expressing the gene product. However, because of the potential difficulty in expressing a full-length protein of this size, we created five overlapping peptides (Fig. 2). The five fragments were designated P167A, P167B, P167C, P167D, and P167E. The predicted molecular mass of P167A was 39 kDa, and its DNA sequence extended from bp 58 to 1123, corresponding to the full-length gene. P167B was 40 kDa, and its DNA extended from bp 856 to 1962. P167C was 41 kDa, and its DNA extended from bp 1645 to 2799. P167D was 41 kDa, and its DNA extended from bp 2560 to 3675. P167E was 45 kDa, and its DNA extended from bp 3409 to 4632. Template DNA from the original reactive clone was used to amplify the gene fragments.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Relative sizes, interrelationships, and locations of peptides P167A to P167E in relation to the entire P167 molecule.

Immune sera from experimentally H. bilis-infected mice reacted on immunoblots against two of the five peptide fragments, P167C and P167D (Fig. 1, lanes 2 and 4). Immune sera reacted against recombinant P167C and P167D at dilutions of 1:1,600 and 1:6,400, respectively, in an ELISA. Both reacted at higher titers than the membrane extract (1:800) when tested simultaneously. Sera from Helicobacter-free mice did not react with either P167C or P167D and were used as negative controls for both Western blotting and ELISA.

P167C antiserum, generated by hyperimmunization of mice, reacted strongly with recombinant P167C and weakly with a protein band with a molecular mass of approximately 120 kDa in H. bilis whole-cell lysate immunoblots; the latter band apparently represented native P167 (data not shown). A protein band of this size was not seen on immunoblots prepared from the H. bilis membrane extract. These findings suggested that P167 may be preferentially expressed in vivo or is a secretory product or both. To test for the specificity of P167 for H. bilis, we next examined the immunoblot reactivity of P167C antiserum against whole-cell lysates of H. hepaticus and H. muridarum as well as two unrelated spirochetal species, B. burgdorferi and C. jejuni. The genus Helicobacter is closely related to the genus Campylobacter and was at one time included in the genus Campylobacter (15, 18). P167C antiserum did not react with bands of sizes similar to those of P167 from H. hepaticus, H. muridarum, B. burgdorferi, or C. jejuni whole-cell lysates. P167C antiserum, however, reacted weakly with an approximately 60-kDa band on immunoblots prepared from whole-cell lysates of all Helicobacter species as well as Campylobacter and Borrelia. Because these bands were not the same size as those of P167 and because similarly sized bands reacted with all species of bacteria, this result was interpreted as cross-reactivity of hyperimmune serum to a protein derived from E. coli from which P167C (used for hyperimmunization) was purified. When we probed P167C and P167D peptides with immune sera from mice experimentally infected with H. hepaticus, these sera showed no cross-reactivity with P167C or P167D (Fig. 1, lanes 3 and 5). These data suggest that at least the antigenic epitope(s) of P167 is H. bilis specific.

There are at least two explanations for why P167C antiserum did not react with equivalently sized proteins of H. hepaticus and H. muridarum. One is that these two species do not possess the P167 gene; another is that they possess a P167 gene homologue, but the gene products do not have similar antigenic epitopes. To further explore these possibilities, we performed PCR with all five sets of P167 fragment primers and H. hepaticus and H. muridarum genomic DNAs as templates. All five fragments were amplified from H. muridarum genomic DNA, and the amplicons were similar in size to those of H. bilis (Fig. 3). In contrast, the P167A, P167B, P167C, and P167D primers amplified DNA from H. hepaticus, but the P167E primers did not. The amplification products were equivalent in size to their corresponding H. bilis homologues. No product was amplified from C. jejuni or B. burgdorferi genomic DNA targets with any of the five primer sets. The density of amplicons from H. hepaticus and H. muridarum was much lower than that seen with H. bilis, suggesting a lower homology of P167 counterparts in H. hepaticus and H. muridarum. Sequence comparison has yet to be performed.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

PCR amplification of the P167 fragments with H. bilis (lanes 1 to 5), H. hepaticus (lanes 6 to 10), and H. muridarum (lanes 11 to 15) targets. Lanes 1, 6, and 11, P167A DNA. Lanes 2, 7, and 12, P167B DNA. Lanes 3, 8, and 13, P167C DNA. Lanes 4, 9, and 14, P167D DNA. Lanes 5, 10, and 15, P167E DNA.

Finally, we examined whether naturally infected mice had antibodies to recombinant P167. Sera were collected from nine mice that had PCR-verified natural infections with H. bilis and from four mice that had PCR-verified natural infections with H. hepaticus. The duration of infection in these mice was unknown. These sera were used to probe dot immunoblots of the H. bilis membrane extract, P167C, and P167D (Fig. 4). Four of the nine sera from H. bilis-infected mice reacted with all three antigens, and one of the nine sera from H. bilis infected mice reacted with only the membrane extract. One serum from an H. bilis infected mouse had antibody to P167D only, and another had antibodies to both P167C and P167D. Two mice infected with H. bilis did not possess antibody to the H. bilis membrane extract, P167C, or P167D. None of the four sera from H. hepaticus-infected mice reacted with P167C or P167D, and one of the four sera from H. hepaticus-infected mice reacted with the H. bilis membrane extract. In summary, among seven of nine H. bilis-infected mouse sera that reacted with any one of the antigens, six reacted with P167D, five reacted with P167C, and five reacted with the membrane extract. Further studies with more serum samples from naturally infected mice are warranted, but these results show potential for these recombinant antigens to serve as diagnostic reagents.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Dot blot with sera from mice naturally infected with H. bilis or H. hepaticus. The top row contains H. bilis membrane antigen extract; the middle row contains recombinant P167C antigen; and the bottom row contains recombinant P167D antigen. Lanes 1 to 9 contain sera from nine mice naturally infected with H. bilis; lanes 10 to 13 contain sera from four mice naturally infected with H. hepaticus.

DISCUSSION

Sera from mice infected with H. bilis react with a number of proteins that could serve as antigens for serodiagnosis, if cloned and expressed in recombinant form. Membrane antigens are logically favored targets, in that it is presumed that they are most apt to interface with the host during infection and thus elicit an antibody response. In one study, nine native proteins from H. bilis outer membrane protein (OMP) preparations were found to be immunoreactive. The proteins ranged from 20 to 80 kDa (14). Our current study revealed 5 immunoreactive native proteins with molecular masses of approximately 15, 30, 40, 50, and 60 kDa and 18 minor bands ranging from 10 to 100 kDa. We did not rule out the possibility that some of the smaller reactive bands might have been proteolytic degradation products. The difference in the results was due to different methods of antigen preparation. In the earlier study, OMP was generated by initially sonicating cells, centrifuging the samples to remove cell debris, and then adding 0.6% N-lauroyl sarcosine to the supernatants. OMP preparations consisted of detergent-solubilized proteins. It was therefore possible that the OMP preparation excluded some membrane proteins that could have been associated with cell debris and included cytosol proteins solubilized by detergent. In contrast, we incubated intact cells with 1% n-octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside to release membrane proteins and then removed cell debris. Therefore, our preparation included as many membrane proteins as possible without including cytosol proteins. Whatever the method, these studies indicate that H. bilis elicits antibody responses during infection to a number of antigens, but the specificity and sensitivity of these individual antigens are unknown.

Membrane extracts are generally used as antigens for Helicobacter serodiagnostic purposes in ELISAs, but results have not been particularly sensitive or specific. For example, sera from mice experimentally infected with H. hepaticus cross-reacted with H. bilis and H. rodentium membrane extracts, making the specificities only 34 and 35%, respectively (34). Sera from mice that were naturally exposed to H. bilis cross-reacted with an H. hepaticus membrane antigen in an ELISA, and PCR and culturing had to be performed to determine if mice were coinfected (34).

The current study revealed a large, immunoreactive protein (P167) that appeared to elicit an antibody response in mice infected with H. bilis. A comparison of membrane extracts with whole-cell lysates as antigens on immunoblots revealed that antiserum to P167C reacted weakly with the lysates but not with the membrane extracts. This result suggested that P167 may not be associated with the membrane and may be a secretory product that stimulates host immunity. Alternatively, P167 may be preferentially expressed in vivo but not in vitro. Thus, despite the logic of focusing on membrane proteins as potential antigens for serodiagnosis, other antigens may be superior in terms of antigenicity, species specificity, and possibly sensitivity. Comparison of serum reactivity titers for membrane extracts and recombinant P167C and P167D peptides revealed higher titers for the recombinant peptides, with the added advantage of species specificity. Testing a limited number of serum samples from naturally infected mice suggested that membrane antigen extracts were less sensitive (and less specific) for detecting antibody reactivity to H. bilis than recombinant P167C and P167D. Further studies are needed to determine if P167C and P167D can detect early antibody responses during infection.

P167C hyperimmune serum did not recognize a protein with a size similar to that of P167 from H. hepaticus or H. muridarum whole-cell lysates, and H. hepaticus immune serum did not react with P167C or P167D recombinant proteins in immunoblotting. The fact that we were able to amplify all five fragments of P167 from H. muridarum genomic DNA and four out of five fragments from H. hepaticus indicates that H. bilis, H. hepaticus, and H. muridarum all share homologues of this protein that do not share antigenic epitopes. Furthermore, we found at least three clones that contained an operon that encoded a predicted 158-kDa gene product that shared regions of homology with P167. This result may indicate that recombination occurs at a variable middle section of the gene to create new genes. What drives the recombination is not clear, but this scenario may suggest that these proteins have important functions in the biology of these bacteria.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sara Barrett Mulinyawe for technical support.

This work was supported by NIH grant RR14034 from the Comparative Medicine Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Beckwith, C. S., C. L. Franklin, J. R. R. Hook, C. L. Besch-Williford, and L. K. Rileys. 1997. Fecal PCR assay for diagnosis of Helicobacter infection in laboratory rodents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1620-1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bryner, J. H., J. Littleton, C. Gates, D. A. Kirkbride, and A. E. Richies. 1986. Flexispira rappini gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-negative rod from mammalian fetus and feces, p. 11-18. In Microbe86, XIVth International Congress of Microbiology, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • 3.Dewhirst, F. E., J. G. Fox, E. N. Mendes, B. J. Paster, C. E. Gates, C. A. Kirkbride, and K. A. Eatons. 2000. “Flexispira rappini” strains represent at least 10 Helicobacter taxa. Int. J. Syst. E vol. Microbiol. 50:1781-1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feng, S., S. Das, T. Lam, R. A. Flavell, and E. Fikrigs. 1995. A 55-kilodalton antigen encoded by a gene on a Borrelia burgdorferi 49-kb plasmid is recognized by antibodies in sera from patients with Lyme disease. Infect. Immun. 63:3459-3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng, S., E. Hodzic, and S. W. Bartholds. 2000. Lyme arthritis resolution with antiserum to a 37-kilodalton Borrelia burgdorferi protein. Infect. Immun. 68:4169-4173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Feng, S., E. Hodzic, B. Stevenson, and S. W. Bartholds. 1998. Humoral immunity to Borrelia burgdorferi N40 decorin binding proteins during infection of laboratory mice. Infect. Immun. 66:2827-2835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fox, J. G., F. E. Dewhirst, Z. Shen, Y. Feng, N. S. Taylor, B. J. Paster, R. L. Ericson, C. N. Lau, P. Correa, J. C. Araya, and I. Roas. 1998. Hepatic Helicobacter species indentified in bile and gallbladder tissue from Chileans with chronic cholecystitis. Gastroenterology 114:755-763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fox, J. G., F. E. Dewhirst, J. G. Tully, B. J. Paster, L. Yan, N. S. Taylor, M. J. Collins, P. L. Gorelick, and J. M. Wards. 1994. Helicobacter hepaticus sp. nov., a microaerophilic bacterium isolated from livers and intestinal mucosal scrapings from mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1238-1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fox, J. G., X. Li, L. Yan, R. J. Cahill, R. Hurley, R. Lewis, and J. C. Murphys. 1996. Chronic proliferative hepatitis in A/JCr mice associated with persistent Helicobacter hepaticus infection: a model of Helicobacter-induced carcinogenesis. Infect. Immun. 64:1548-1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fox, J. G., L. Yan, B. Shames, J. Campbell, J. C. Murphy, and X. Lis. 1996. Persistent hepatitis and enterocolitis in germfree mice infected with Helicobacter hepaticus. Lab. Anim. Sci. 64:3673-3681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fox, J. G., L. L. Yan, F. E. Dewhirst, B. J. Paster, B. Shames, J. C. Murphy, A. Hayward, J. C. Belcher, and E. N. Mendess. 1995. Helicobacter bilis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter species isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:445-454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Franklin, C. L., L. K. Riley, R. S. Livingston, C. S. Beckwith, C. L. Besch-Williford, and R. R. J. Hooks. 1998. Enterohepatic lesions in SCID mice infected with Helicobacter bilis. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48:334-339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Franklin, C. L., L. K. Riley, R. S. Livingston, C. S. Beckwith, R. R. J. Hook, C. L. Besch-Williford, R. Hunziker, and P. L. Gorelicks. 1999. Enteric lesions in SCID mice infected with “Helicobacter typhlonicus”, a novel urease-negative Helicobacter species. Lab. Anim. Sci. 49:496-505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ge, Z., P. Doig, and J. G. Foxs. 2001. Characterization of proteins in the outer membrane preparation of a murine pathogen, Helicobacter bilis. Infect. Immun. 69:3502-3506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goodwin, S. C., J. A. Armstrong, T. Chilvers, M. Peters, M. D. Collins, L. Sly, M. McConnell, and W. E. Harpers. 1989. Transfer of Campylobacter pylori and Campylobacter mustalae to Helicobacter gen. nov. as Helicobacter pylori comb. nov. and Helicobacter mustalae comb. nov., respectively. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:397-405. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haines, D. C., P. L. Gorelick, J. K. Battles, K. M. Pike, R. J. Anderson, J. G. Fox, N. S. Taylor, Z. Shen, F. E. Dewhrist, M. R. Anver, and J. M. Wards. 1998. Inflammatory large bowel disease in immunodeficient rats naturally and experimentally infected with Helicobacter bilis. Vet. Pathol. 35:202-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hodzic, E., M. Mckisic, S. Feng, and S. W. Bartholds. 2001. Evaluation of diagnostic methods for Helicabacter bilis infection in laboratory mice. Comp. Med. 51:406-412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jerris, R. C.1995. Helicobacter, p. 492-498. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  • 19.Lee, A., M. W. Phillips, J. L. O'Rourke, B. J. Paster, F. E. Dewhirst, G. J. Fraser, J. G. Fox, L. I. Sly, P. J. Romaniuk, T. J. Trust, and S. Kouprachs. 1992. Helicobacter muridarum sp. nov., a microaerophilic helical bacterium with a novel ultrastructure isolated from the intestinal mucosa of rodents. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:27-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Livingston, R. S., L. K. Riley, R. R. J. Hook, C. L. Belsch-Williford, and C. L. Franklins. 1999. Cloning and expression of an immunogenic membrane-associated protein of Helicobacter hepaticus for use in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 6:745-750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Livingston, R. S., L. K. Riley, E. K. Steffen, C. L. Besch-Williford, R. R. Hook, and C. L. Franklins. 1997. Serodiagnosis of Helicobacter hepaticus infection in mice by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1236-1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Paster, B. J., A. Lee, J. G. Fox, F. E. Dewhirst, L. A. Tordoff, G. J. Fraser, J. L. O'Rourke, N. S. Taylor, and R. Ferreros. 1991. Phylogeny of Helicobacter felis sp. nov., Helicobacter mustelae, and related bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:31-38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Riley, L. K., C. L. Franklin, J. Hook, R. R., and C. Besch-Williford. 1996. Identification of murine helicobacters by PCR and restriction enzyme analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:942-946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schauer, D. B., N. Ghori, and S. Falkows. 1993. Isolation and characterization of “Flexispira rappini” from laboratory mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2709-2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sears, J. E., E. Fikrig, T. Y. Nakagawa, K. Deponte, N. Marcantonio, F. S. Kantor, and R. A. Flavells. 1991. Molecular mapping of OspA-mediated immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease. J. Immunol. 147:1995-2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shames, B., J. G. Fox, F. Dewhirst, L. Yan, Z. Shen, and N. S. Taylors. 1995. Identification of widespread Helicobacter hepaticus infection in feces in commercial mouse colonies by culture and PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2968-2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shen, Z., J. G. Fox, F. E. Dewhirst, B. J. Paster, C. J. Foltz, L. Yan, B. Shames, and L. Perrys. 1997. Helicobacter rodentium sp. nov., a urease-negative Helicobacter species isolated from laboratory mice. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:627-634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shomer, N. H., C. A. Dangler, R. P. Marini, and J. G. Foxs. 1998. Helicobacter bilis/Helicobacter rodentium co-infection associated with diarrhea in a colony of scid mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48:455-459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shomer, N. H., C. A. Dangler, M. D. Schrenzel, and J. G. Foxs. 1997. Helicobacter bilis-induced inflammatory bowel disease in scid mice with deficient flora. Infect. Immun. 65:4858-4864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shomer, N. H., C. A. Dangler, M. D. Schrenzel, M. T. Whary, S. Xu, Y. Feng, B. J. Paster, F. E. Dewhirst, and J. G. Foxs. 2001. Cholangiohepatitis and inflammatory bowel disease induced by a novel urease-negative Helicobacter species in A/J and Tac:ICR:HascidfRF mice. Exp. Biol. Med. 226:420-428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Strober, W., and R. O. Ehrhardts. 1993. Chronic intestinal inflammation: an unexpected outcome in cytokine or T cell receptor mutant mice. Cell 75:203-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vandamme, P., E. Falsen, R. Rossau, B. Hoste, P. Segers, R. Tytgat, and J. De Ley. 1991. Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic description and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:88-103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ward, J. M., M. R. Anver, D. C. Haines, and R. E. Benvenistes. 1994. Chronic active hepatitis in mice caused by Helicobacter hepaticus. Am. J. Pathol. 145:959-968. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Whary, M. T., J. H. Cline, A. E. King, K. M. Hewes, D. Chojnacky, A. Salvarrey, and J. G. Foxs. 2000. Monitoring sentinel mice for Helicobacter hepaticus, H. rodentium, and H. bilis infection by use of polymerase chain reaction anlysis and serologic testing. Comp. Med. 50:436-443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES