Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2025 Apr 4;21(4):e1013003. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013003

Intact HIV DNA decays in children with and without complete viral load suppression

Daniel B Reeves 1,2,*, Morgan Litchford 3, Carolyn S Fish 3, Anna Farrell-Sherman 1, Makayla Poindexter 1, Nashwa Ahmed 1, Noah A J Cassidy 3, Jillian Neary 2, Dalton Wamalwa 2,4, Agnes Langat 4, Daisy Chebet 4, Hellen Moraa 4, Annukka A R Antar 5, Jennifer Slyker 2, Sarah Benki-Nugent 2, Lillian B Cohn 1, Joshua T Schiffer 1,6, Julie Overbaugh 3, Grace John-Stewart 2,6, Dara A Lehman 2,3
Editor: Mary F Kearney7
PMCID: PMC12002518  PMID: 40184428

Abstract

To inform cure in children living with HIV (CWH), we elucidated the dynamics and mechanisms underlying HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy (ART). In 120 Kenyan CWH who initiated ART between 1-12 months of age, 55 had durable viral load suppression, and 65 experienced ART interruptions. We measured plasma HIV RNA levels, CD4+ T cell count, and levels of intact and defective HIV DNA proviruses via the cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay (CS-IPDA). By modeling data from the durably suppressed subset, we found that during early ART (year 0-1 on ART), plasma RNA levels decayed rapidly and biphasically and intact and defective HIV DNA decayed with mean 3 and 9 month half-lives, respectively. After viral suppression was achieved (years 1-8 on ART), intact HIV DNA decay slowed to a mean 22 month half-life, whilst defective HIV DNA no longer decayed. In five CWH, we found individual CD4+ TCRβ clones wax and wane, but average kinetics resembled those of defective DNA and CD4 count, suggesting that differential decay of intact HIV DNA arises from selective pressures overlaying normal CD4+ T cell kinetics. Finally, by modeling HIV RNA and DNA in CWH with treatment interruptions, we linked temporary viremia to transient rises in HIV DNA, but long-term intact reservoirs were not strongly influenced, suggesting brief treatment interruptions may not significantly increase HIV reservoirs in children.

Author summary

HIV remains a difficult prognosis for children because it is deadly if untreated and therefore requires a lifetime of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Here we analyzed data from a cohort of children in Nairobi Kenya who acquired HIV and determined that the reservoir of latently infected cells that persist during ART, and are the barrier preventing cure, decays consistently but slowly over 10 years of ART. We provide detailed estimates of HIV reservoir decay rates for the subset of children that suppressed their viral loads and relate decay to immunological factors (such as CD4+ T cell levels and clonality). Using mathematical modeling, we also showed that brief treatment interruptions do not increase long-term reservoir levels. Our results could inform cures targeting immunological factors and the handling of treatment interruptions, whether planned in clinical trials or incidental in the real world.

Introduction

Children are an especially relevant population for HIV cure both because they face a lifetime prognosis of ART and because known exposures from mothers enables earlier treatment and better acquisition time estimates than typical for adults [1,2]. Though antiretroviral therapy (ART) vastly improves survival of perinatally infected children living with HIV (CWH) [2], mortality and adverse outcomes remain more common in CWH on ART than in children without HIV [3–5]. Moreover, suppressive ART is not curative. CWH must continue ART due to a reservoir of latently infected cells harboring HIV DNA proviruses [6,7] which can seed rebound viremia if ART is stopped [8,9]. Very-early ART for confirmed in utero HIV acquisition powerfully restricts reservoir size [10] and smaller reservoirs are associated with longer times to viral load rebound if ART is stopped [11–14]. This was exemplified by early treated CWH like the highly publicized ‘Mississippi baby,’ who experienced ART-free remission for almost two years [1,15,16]. Yet, the eventual viral rebound of this exceptional child highlights why we still need a better understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of pediatric reservoir persistence, including immune correlates of reduced reservoir size or decay.

Several mechanistic insights into reservoirs have been revealed by specifically assaying intact proviruses. Intact proviral DNA assays (IPDA) [17–21] quantify defective HIV proviruses and those that are intact at two or more conserved locations, providing an approximation of the rebound competent reservoir [22]. IPDA studies in adults have shown intact HIV proviruses decay faster than defective HIV proviruses [17,23–26]. Pediatric studies also showed this “differential decay” [10,27] but have mostly addressed the first 2 years of ART and/or have been limited geographically to US participants with predominantly subtype B HIV-1. Thus, previous studies might not be representative of long term kinetics in subtype B nor be representative of kinetics in children in global HIV hotspots such as sub-Saharan Africa where other subtypes (e.g., A, C, and D) predominate.

Proliferation of latently infected cells is a key mechanism driving HIV reservoir persistence [23,28–31]. In adults, we found that HIV proviral sequences and memory CD4+ T cell receptor β (TCRβ) sequences both waxed and waned over time [32]. Moreover, modeling longitudinal data suggested that many drivers of HIV persistence could be the same as those maintaining memory CD4 T cells [33]. Meanwhile, certain immune markers related to cell proliferation, inflammation, and signaling have been correlated with intact reservoirs in adults, leading us to hypothesize that interleukins and/or Granzyme B, which mediate proliferation and/or apoptosis of memory CD4+ T cells could influence HIV reservoir kinetics [34,35].

To address several of these issues, we used our cross-subtype IPDA (CS-IPDA) assay [18,19,36] to study the Optimizing Pediatric HIV (OPH) cohort, an early-treated cohort of 120 Kenyan children that was followed for 10 years [8,37]. This powerful cohort has illuminated that viral suppression is harder for younger children than older children [38] and that ART adherence remains a key issue for CWH [38,39], with adolescents in particular often struggling to maintain durable viral suppression [40]. For this group, immunosuppression, first-line ART regimens, and cytomegalovirus and Epstein Barr acquisition age and viremia associated with HIV DNA seeding and maintenance [41]. A randomized trial in this cohort (NCT00428116) assessed analytical treatment interruption (ATI) in 21 children at year 2 of ART.

Our goal in the present work was to rigorously characterize intact and defective HIV DNA kinetics in a cohort with representative characteristics of the global pediatric HIV population. We quantitated decay and expansion rates for HIV RNA and DNA and CD4+ T cells. We also explored factors contributing to reservoir decay including immune markers and CD4+ T cell sequencing. Finally, given the challenges for ART adherence and virologic suppression in this population, we developed a model that allowed us to include participants with periods of viremia and understand how treatment interruptions in CWH influence HIV reservoirs, which is key to informing the ethics of performing ATI trials, the gold standard for assessing HIV cure [42,43].

Results

The OPH cohort: early ART in Kenyan children living with HIV

The Optimizing Pediatric HIV (OPH) cohort is comprised of 120 children from Nairobi, Kenya who acquired HIV through vertical transmission from their mother and initiated ART early after birth (Fig 1A); median age at ART start was 3 months (range 1-17 months) with even male/female distribution (Fig 1B). Follow up continued for up to 10 years after ART initiation. Based on HIV pol sequencing for N=106 (88%) of the 120 children included here, HIV-1 subtypes were split into 68 (64%) subtype A, 10 (9%) subtype C, 21 (20%) subtype D, and 7 (7%) recombinant (Fig 1C).

Fig 1. OPH cohort data and study design.

Fig 1

A) Overall cohort comprises 120 Kenyan children who acquired HIV near birth and received early ART. B) HIV-1 subtype from 106 participants sequenced via pol. C) Histogram of ART initiation age colored to show balance of male and female children. D) Longitudinal measurement timing is noted for viral load (log10 HIV RNA copies/mL) and CD4 count (cells/µL) as approximately every 6 months for all participants. Intact and defective HIV DNA using the CS-IPDA assay were measured at 7 time points and number of participants sampled at each time point are noted. Immune markers (N=30 children) were measured at the HIV DNA time points. Non-naïve TCRβ sequencing (N=5 children) was performed at two long-term ART time points. E) Viral loads for the suppressed and viremic subsets of OPH participants, stratified based on whether viral load dropped below 1000 copies/mL within the first year of ART and stayed below 3000 copies/mL thereafter.

Longitudinal measurements of plasma viral load, CD4 count, intact and defective HIV proviruses, immune markers and TCR sequencing during 10 years of ART

To determine the dynamics of HIV reservoirs and related viral and cellular variables in OPH participants, CD4+ T cell counts (cells/µL), and plasma viral loads (log10 HIV RNA copies/mL) were obtained every 3-6 months, resulting in median of 19 (range 1-32) viral loads and 11 (range 1-24) CD4 counts per child over a 10 year period (Fig 1D). There were 95 participants who had viral load measurements at 12 months, 75 at 40 months, and 57 at 96 months – decrease over time was due to death and loss of follow-up.

The cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay (CS-IPDA) was used to quantify intact and defective HIV provirus levels. We measured HIV DNA in copies per million T cells given the smaller numbers of cells available from the pediatric samples. Samples were available for CS-IPDA measurements from 83 participants from time points at ART initiation (or just before) and months 6, 12, 24, 40, 60, and 96 on ART (Figs 1D and S1). There were a median of 5 (range 1-10) longitudinal CS-IPDA measurements per child over the whole study.

Additionally, four immune markers (IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, GzB) were measured in plasma from 30 participants at or close to CS-IPDA time points, and non-naive CD4+ T cell receptor β-chain repertoire sequencing was performed on 5 participants at roughly month 40 and 96 on ART (Fig 1D and Methods).

Validating the CS-IPDA assay for OPH samples

CS-IPDA is a multiplexed droplet-digital PCR assay that targets 3 HIV-genomic regions (gag, pol and env) [18,19]. Our primers were designed based on the sequences available in the Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) database in 2019-2020 (https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/HIV/mainpage.html), which included Kenyan samples from the time the participants in the OPH cohort acquired HIV (2007-2010) [8].

Although we do not have full length HIV sequences to verify intact versus defective proviruses as classified by our CS-IPDA, we determined the proportion of samples for which our CS-IPDA failed to detect any signal for any of the 3 targets (similar to [44]). Complete lack of signal detection for a target region could either indicate assay failure due to polymorphisms in the primers and/or probe binding sites (potentially intact sequences that are called defective) or could indicate true missing genomic regions due to deletions (true defectives that are called defective). Only 10 of 356 (3%) samples with CS-IPDA measurements had no signal from a target. Importantly, every CS-IPDA target was detected in at least one sample time point for all individuals tested here. This is a very low failure rate compared to other published IPDAs [44] and suggests our CS-IPDA effectively works across the HIV subtypes in this cohort.

Splitting suppressed and viremic subsets of participants in OPH

Given the challenges of viral suppression in CWH, we defined a “suppressed subset” that achieved HIV viral loads below 1000 copies/mL by 1 year after ART initiation and then remained below 3000 copies/mL thereafter. Overall, 55 CWH, representative of the OPH cohort age and sex distribution, met criteria for the suppressed subset with 65 participants comprising the viremic subset (viral loads in Fig 1E).

Though 3000 copies/mL is above standard pediatric definitions of durable suppression, this higher level enabled us to include several more participants with key long-term HIV provirus measurements. To ensure this definition was not unreasonable, we performed additional analyses. First, as would be expected, we showed intact and defective HIV provirus levels were higher in the viremic vs suppressed participants during and after the first year of ART (S2 Fig, all p<1e-5). Second, examining time points after the first year of ART in the suppressed subset, we found intact and defective HIV provirus levels were not significantly different between time points with low but detectable viral loads (below 3000 copies/mL) vs. undetectable viral loads (S3 Fig). Third, we examined the relationship between HIV RNA viral load area under the curve (AUC) and final intact HIV DNA level (S4 Fig) and found no strong statistical relationship (Spearman p=0.3), suggesting that occasional viremia does not strongly alter long-term reservoir size. Finally, when we estimated decay rates from these data, we also performed sensitivity analyses with more stringent suppression criteria: HIV viral loads below 1000 or 300 copies per mL after initial suppression and show similar results despite the smaller sample sizes (see below).

Population dynamics of viral loads, CD4 counts, and intact and defective HIV proviruses in children who achieve viral load suppression

In the suppressed subset of 55 CWH as defined above, we applied population nonlinear mixed effects (pNLME) modeling to estimate kinetics of viral loads, CD4 counts, and intact and defective HIV proviruses. To avoid biases from decreasing observation numbers over study years, we estimated rates during and after the first year of ART separately (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Modeled kinetics in suppressed subset.

Fig 2

A) For viral load, CD4 count, and intact and defective HIV DNA, exponential population nonlinear mixed effects modeling (pNLME) fit to data separated by early (<1 year, left) and long-term (>1 year, right) ART. Note months vs years in x-axes. Dashed lines indicate individual trajectories with dots at observed time points. Bold lines indicate pNLME population mean. B) Estimated population means (dots) and 95% confidence intervals (CI, lines) for each data type. Phases were defined as the first 0-2 months, 2-12 months for HIV RNA and 0-1 year for HIV DNA, and 1-8 years on ART. Axes are split by no decay (or very stable kinetics) such that half-lives and doubling times can be presented. Arrows on CI indicate overlap with no decay. Comparisons indicate 1-sided Z-test. C) Simulation summary of mean (line) and 95% CI (shading) kinetics relative to baseline level for each data type.

HIV viral loads decayed with a mean half-life of 6 days (95% CI: 5–9 days) for the first 2 months of ART, and thereafter a mean half-life of 2.7 months (95% CI: 2–4.6 months) until suppression was achieved at the end of the first year of ART (note suppression is generally slower than typical for adults). In the first year of ART, intact and defective HIV proviruses decayed differentially with mean half-lives of 2.7 months (95% CI: 2–4.1 months) and 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4–20.7 months), respectively. After 1 year of ART, intact proviruses continued to decline, but more slowly, with a mean half-life of 22 months (95% CI: 10.5–∞ months), whereas defective HIV proviruses stabilized or increased extremely slowly with a doubling time of 101 months (95% CI: 54–845 months) (Fig 2B).

Concurrently, CD4 counts rose with a mean doubling time of 15 months (95% CI: 11.6–21.1 months) in the first year on ART and thereafter declined with a mean half-life of 7.8 years (95% CI: 6–10.9 years). These CD4 kinetics were similar to three published studies of infants without HIV [45–47] (S5 Fig).

All population decay rates, standard errors, and model error (% residual squared error) are reported in S1 Table and kinetics are visually summarized (relative to baseline level) in Fig 2C.

Multiphasic differential decay of intact and defective HIV DNA in children

We observed three phases of decay for HIV RNA, and two phases for HIV DNA. However, others have observed that (in adults) HIV DNA decay also could have two phases during 0-1 year on ART (as for RNA [48]). Indeed, the second phase decay of HIV RNA (2-12 months on ART) was similar to the decay rate of HIV DNA in the first year of ART (p=0.43, Fig 2B). Thus we speculated that there could be an additional first phase of HIV DNA decay that may be observed with tighter sampling [27] Therefore, we refer to 3 phases of decay, the first being months 0-2 (which for HIV DNA we do not estimate), the second 2-12 months (which for HIV DNA we approximate with the 0-1 year phase), and the third from 12 months to 8 years.

Given these definitions, we found intact HIV DNA decayed faster than defective HIV DNA in children with viral load suppression during the first year on ART (phase 2 p=0.0003, Fig 2B), and during 1-8 years on ART (phase 3 p=0.02, Fig 2B). This demonstrates differential decay of intact and defective proviruses as has been observed in adults and children in many different cohorts with other timelines and HIV subtypes.

As a sensitivity analysis on our suppression criterion choice, we estimated intact HIV DNA decay rates with different criteria for suppression (S8 Fig). There were 7 children who maintained HIV RNA < 300 copy/mL for the entire study and also had observed intact DNA data, though only 1 of these children had 3 longitudinal time points, the rest having a single time point. Intact half-life estimated in these children was 22 months, with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 8-infinite. There were 17 children who maintained HIV RNA < 1000 copy/mL for the entire study and also had observed intact DNA data, with 9 of these children having 2 or more longitudinal time points. Intact half-life estimated in these children was 55 months, with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 16-infinite. Overall, this analysis showed mean estimates in more stringently defined suppression groups did not disagree with the initial criteria (Fig 2), but estimates were less imprecise due to low numbers.

A strength of pNLME modeling is that a population average is rigorously defined while individual rates are estimated for each participant [49]. Thus, we can check whether the population trends apply to individuals. Indeed, the same kinetic patterns revealed across the population (Fig 2C) were also seen for certain individual participants with extensive longitudinal sampling (S6 Fig). We did not observe any differences between HIV provirus kinetic rates stratified by participant sex, age at ART initiation, or ART regimen. However, related to the results above, on the individual level we also saw that faster decay of intact HIV proviruses was significantly correlated with faster decay of defective HIV proviruses in the first year on ART (rho=0.5, p=5e-4) (S7 Fig).

Relationships between immune markers and HIV reservoir kinetics

We sought to determine whether several important plasma immune markers related to cell proliferation and/or killing could be related to HIV reservoirs dynamics. Thus, we measured longitudinal levels of interleukins IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and Granzyme B (GzB) in N=30 children who had at least 3 measurements of HIV proviruses after 1 year on ART. Our hypotheses were that elevated levels of the proliferative cytokines IL-7 and IL-15 would associate with slower decay of defective HIV proviruses and/or expansion of CD4 count, and that elevated levels of IL-2 and GzB which are biomarkers of immune activation, would associate with faster decline of viral load and/or intact vs. defective HIV proviruses because increased immune recognition may preferentially deplete cells harboring intact but not defective provirus. Immune marker kinetics in our cohort followed patterns of early decay followed by a stable setpoint (GzB), or a stable level throughout ART (IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15) (Fig 3A). Within participants, early (at ART initiation) and late (average >1 year of ART) levels of IL-2 and IL-15 were strongly correlated (rho>0.7) and IL-7 was moderately correlated with these two (rho>0.4) (S9A Fig).

Fig 3. Comparison of HIV kinetics to immune marker dynamics and CD4+ T cell clone dynamics.

Fig 3

A) Kinetics of immune markers measured in 30 OPH participants. B) Baseline GzB and IL15 (at ART initiation) associated with very early viral load (<2 months) and early (<1 year) intact decay, respectively. Line/shading is linear regression and 95% CI. Spearman correlation coefficients and p-values are noted but are not significant after multiple comparisons correction (significance would require p<0.003). All comparisons shown in S7 Fig. C) Schematic of TCR sequencing after magnetic bead isolation of non-naive CD4+ T cells. D) Paired longitudinal nnTCRβ clone kinetics from five participants from clones observed at both timepoints (roughly 40 to 96 months after ART) after downsampling to lowest sample size across participants (Methods). E) Histogram of fold-changes from paired persistent clones. Colored lines match individuals in D. F) Mean (dot) and 95% CI (line) rate for nnTCRβ kinetic change rates compared against individual HIV DNA and CD4 count rates from the matching participants. Asterisks for 4 of 5 participant IDs denote intact HIV DNA rate is significantly faster than other rates as determined by no overlap in 95% CI. Intact proviruses tend to decline whereas the total is stable and expansion and contraction of typical TCR clones is balanced.

There were correlations between immune markers and viral kinetics: higher baseline GzB was associated with faster phase 1 RNA decay Spearman rho=0.6, p=0.01, Fig 3B). Higher baseline IL-15 levels were associated with faster phase 2 intact HIV provirus decay (Spearman rho=0.5, p=0.036, Fig 3B). We highlight these associations because of their relative strength (rho>0.5) but trends do not achieve p<0.001, a conservative Bonferroni significance threshold given the number of comparisons (S9B Fig).

Relationship between CD4 clones and HIV DNA kinetics

We next sought to characterize CD4+ T cell clonality and compare with HIV provirus kinetics, with the hypothesis that carrier cell homeostasis predominantly drives the dynamics of HIV proviruses [33]. From PBMC samples from 5 participants with >5 longitudinal HIV provirus measurements (S5 Fig), we selected the 40 and 96 month time points (Fig 1C), isolated non-naïve CD4+ T cells, and obtained T cell receptor β chain repertoires (nnTCRβ) to estimate clonality from the cell types that most commonly harbor HIV proviruses [31,50] (Methods and Fig 3C).

Sample sizes (number of cells sequenced) ranged from 4,904 to 61,288 sequences. The fraction of clones that were unique ranged from 70-90%, with richness (number of unique clonotypes) increasing with the number of cells sequenced. However, in larger samples, the same clones were more likely to be repeatedly found (S10 Fig) such that richness showed some signs of saturation. For fair comparisons, we downsampled all data sets to the smallest sample size of 4900 cells. From these resampled data, we observed roughly 1-3% of clonotypes persisting through the two time points. Persistent clonotypes were typically small (1/1000 of cells or fewer), though some reached proportional abundances of >1/100 cells in the sample.

These clonotypes expanded and contracted (Fig 3D), with a distribution of fold changes that roughly symmetric and centered just above 1. This means that contractions and expansions are generally balanced. It was slightly more likely to observe fold changes greater than 8 vs less than 1/8 (Fig 3E), which may mean that large expansions are more common than large contractions, but sampling could drive this finding as contractions are effectively bounded by incomplete sampling.

We also computed the rate change in abundance for each paired clone (Methods) and compared nnTCRβ kinetic rates to individual decay rate estimates for HIV provirus and CD4 count from these five participants. There was considerable overlap between estimated decay rates for CD4 count, defective HIV DNA, and nnTCRβ clones, but mean intact HIV DNA decayed faster in all individuals, with significance (no overlap of confidence intervals) found in 4 of the 5 individuals (Fig 3F). These results imply that defective DNA kinetics resemble CD4 count and typical non-naïve CD4+ T cell kinetics whereas intact DNA is cleared more rapidly. These findings in Fig 3F indicate that there is a balance where some CD4+ T cell clonotypes expand and contract such that the total level tends to stay stable (as CD4 count). The total level of defective proviruses also remains stable, but intact proviruses tend to decline.

Modeling HIV DNA during RNA viremia

To determine the influence of HIV viremia on HIV DNA, we extended our prior HIV reservoir models [28,51–53] to describe proviral decay while including infected cell creation due to viremia (Fig 4A). The model includes intact and defective proviruses and, based on our results here (and prior modeling/analysis of multiphasic decay [54–56], the model includes three phases which are modeled by infected cell compartments I1,I2,I3 , each with their own clearance rate θ. These clearance rates importantly encompass the net balance of proliferation and death and viral reactivation [51]. First phase infected cells I1 are created proportionally to viral load with a rate b. A small fraction of these cells can transition to phase 2 and 3 states with rates ϕ1 and ϕ2 (all equations in Methods). Infected cell compartments and rates are superscripted (i, d) for intact vs defective with rates allowed to be different.

Fig 4. Modeled kinetics including viremia allow comparison with viremic and suppressed subset.

Fig 4

A) Model schematic to link HIV RNA viremia and creation of HIV DNA (Phase 2 and Phase 3 or shorter and longer-lived, Eq 1). B) Seven example model fits (all in S1 Data) where each column shows a participant, and the rows show HIV RNA and observed intact and defective HIV DNA (dots) vs model output of total HIV DNA (I1+I2+I3, solid line) and Phase 3 long-lived HIV DNA (I3, dashed line). C) Box plots of individual half-life estimates for intact and defective HIV DNA for Phase 2 and Phase 3 split by suppressed (N=55) and viremic (N=27) participants. P-values indicate one-sided Mann-Whitney U-Test.

The model is fit again with pNLME in Monolix but now viral load is treated as a “regressor”, an external force that can drive the infected cell dynamics (Methods). Therefore, we could fit the model to a total of 82 participants, the 55 participants who were suppressed and had CS-IPDA data as well as 27 participants who had substantial viremia but also CS-IPDA measurements. Observed levels of intact and defective HIV DNA were compared to the total of the model as Itot=I1+I2+I3. By adjusting model parameters, we found model output could approximate observed intact and defective provirus levels (7 examples in Fig 4B; all participants with 3 or more longitudinal HIV DNA observations are shown in S1 Data). Residual squared errors were generally below 50% indicating parameters are properly estimated and residual sum of squares (RSS) error normalized to number of data points was generally below 0.1 log indicating a relatively successful model fit, albeit with low numbers of observed time points for some participants.

Modeling suggests DNA creation during viremia is mostly transient

A key model population for HIV cure is I3i, the long-lived infected cells harboring intact HIV DNA, which we envision as an approximation of the rebound-competent latent reservoir (Fig 4A). We assume that during viremia there is creation of infected cells that will eventually enter this reservoir, but we make no assumptions about the exact biology governing this mechanism. However, our model estimates that the reservoir creation rate must be very low. In Fig 4B we show the total infected cells (solid lines) as well as the Phase 3 long-lived infected cells (dashed lines). The total matches the observed data (circles), including transient rises concurrent with viremia, but the long-lived cells are not strongly increased. Most DNA creation during these periods is in shorter lived cells that then are quickly cleared once ART resuppression is achieved.

Similar decay rates for both viremic and suppressed populations

Notably, the best fit model estimates for all clearance half-lives (θ) were not significantly different between the suppressed and viremic participants for any infected cell type (Phase 2 and 3 half-lives for intact and defective HIV DNA, Mann-Whitney p>0.3 for all comparisons, Fig 4C). As in the prior analysis, phase 3 half-lives were different between intact (population mean 31 months) and defective (population mean 990 months) HIV DNA (p<1e-8, Fig 4C). These results suggest that differential decay of intact and defective proviruses also applies to the participants who had some viremia and that long-term HIV DNA half-lives are not slower in viremic vs suppressed participants.

Discussion

Here we analyzed an early treated pediatric cohort of children living with HIV (CWH) from Nairobi, Kenya. Viremia was observed in many children, emphasizing that durable suppression is difficult and reinforcing the crucial need for cure in this population [57]. Among the suppressed subset of CWH, we estimated the longitudinal kinetics of HIV viral load (RNA), CD4 count, and intact and defective HIV DNA, which were quantified using our cross subtype intact proviral DNA assay (CS-IPDA) and population nonlinear mixed effects (pNLME) modeling. HIV viral load decayed rapidly in two phases until undetectable by year 1. CD4 counts expanded early and then contracted, similarly to children without HIV. Intact DNA decayed more rapidly than defective DNA in early (<1 year) and long-term (1-8 year) treatment windows, with similar patterns and half-lives to those previously estimated from pediatric [6,58–63] and adult [48,64,65] cohorts. We determined that 4 relevant immune markers for proliferation and/or killing were not obviously correlated with decay rates, and that non-naïve CD4+ T cell clone kinetics resembled those of defective but not intact HIV DNA, suggesting intact proviruses could influence the death rate of their carrier cells or less frequently become integrated into very long-lived cells than other proviruses. Finally, we developed a model to study the viremic subset of CWH, finding that HIV RNA can be linked to transient rises in HIV DNA, but that viremia (due likely to treatment interruptions) do not strongly influence long-term reservoir size and kinetics.

Although HIV RNA and DNA kinetics in CWH starting ART are well documented [6,27,58,66–69], only recently have pediatric reservoir studies begun to distinguish between intact vs defective proviruses [19,27,62]. Importantly, cross-subtype multiprobe intact proviral DNA assays such as ours and others are needed to understand reservoirs in African children who often acquire subtype A, D, C or circulating recombinant (AE) viruses [19,70,71]. Our results solidify that differential decay of intact and defective proviruses is present in children with non-subtype B infection over very long time scales [72], and that decay rates overlap prior estimates in adults [22,24,25,64]: mean half-lives were 3 months for intact vs 9 months for defective in the first year of ART and then 22 months for intact vs no decay for defective (101 month doubling time) after 1 year on ART.

We also observed that CD4 count (CD4+ T cells per µL) expanded during the first year of ART and then declined afterwards, roughly similar to cell dynamics observed in historic cohorts of children without HIV. An intriguing but likely minor consequence of declining CD4 counts is that given we measure HIV DNA per million T cells, the total body burden of HIV DNA might be declining even faster than the rate we measure per million cells.

To gain mechanistic insight into immunological factors that could contribute to HIV DNA decay, we also examined immune marker dynamics from 30 participants [34,35]. Rather than a broad exploratory analysis, we studied four markers that have been related to key factors for reservoir persistence including T cell proliferation, latency reversal, and immune activation/killing (IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and Granzyme B) [73]. We did note a trend associating higher baseline IL-15 and faster early intact decay. In humans, the IL-15 superagonist N-803 appears to raise NK cell levels [73]. In early treated CWH, reservoir seeding was found to relate to NK cell responses [74]. Thus, although we hypothesized that IL-15 might associate with reservoir expansion through latently infected cell proliferation, it may be that NK cell mediated killing counteracts or overcomes those expansions. However, this trend was not statistically significant after correcting for multiple comparisons, so future studies with larger cohorts will be needed.

Non-naïve T cell receptor (nnTCRβ) sequencing in 5 children allowed us to interrogate the “passenger” hypothesis: that the natural physiology of CD4+ T cells, which involves both cell death and proliferation, is primarily responsible for the dynamics of HIV proviruses [33]. We sorted non-naïve CD4+ T cells, the putative carriers of most HIV proviruses. Between 40 and 96 months after ART, clonal expansions and contractions were roughly symmetric. There was some indication that large expansions were more common than large contractions, but interpretations are difficult given that contraction size estimates are naturally underestimated when clones become undetectable. Still, averaging across these size change distributions, nnTCRβ clonotypes appear very stable, with the most common events being small clonal expansions balanced by small clonal contractions. These clonal dynamics agree with observations that individual HIV clones both wax and wane (in adults [32]) and persist for up to 9 years (in CWH [75]). Combining all clonotypes, our average estimated nnTCRβ clone kinetic rates overlapped those of bulk CD4 count and defective HIV kinetics estimated from the same participants. However, intact HIV provirus dynamics do not appear to be easily explained by passenger kinetics alone, implying additional forces like negative selection on intact proviruses are present in children, as is observed in adults [33,76,77].

One of the major takeaways from our study is the consequences of treatment interruptions in pediatric HIV cohorts. Consensus in the field indicates well-monitored analytical treatment interruption (ATI) studies are largely safe for participants and resuppression appears to return HIV DNA levels to pre-ATI levels [42,78–82], though transmission risk must be considered and some changes to reservoir diversity may be expected [82]. In detailed macaque experiments, barcoded viruses did re-seed reservoirs during ATI [83]. Our cohort consisted of some children who were randomized to ATI at year 2, and others who experienced unplanned treatment interruptions [8]. To assess the impact of treatment interruptions on reservoirs, we modeled HIV DNA inclusive of periods with substantial HIV RNA viremia. We recapitulated observed HIV DNA with a model that described shorter and longer lived (Phases 1, 2, and 3) infected cells. The model projects that the majority of HIV DNA generated during periods of non-suppressed viremia is in shorter lived cells. This implies that HIV DNA transiently rises during periods of viremia but largely returns to baseline within months after re-suppression. Therefore, our model projects a mechanistic basis for why treatment interruptions are not significantly influential on longer term reservoir size and dynamics.

Relatedly, we showed that stringent inclusion criterion of undetectable viremia (as typically used for reservoir studies) might be unnecessarily strict given the heterogeneity of participant data, assay variability and/or noise underlying reservoir data. Indeed, values of intact and defective HIV DNA were not significantly different at timepoints with viral loads <3000 copies/mL vs completely undetectable (<150 copies/mL). Moreover, intact and defective HIV DNA half-lives were similar between viremic and suppressed individuals, shown both via sensitivity analysis (RNA suppression criteria of <300, <1000, and <3000 copies/mL in original decay estimates) as well as using our novel modeling inclusive of viremia. In both prospective and retrospective studies of children with HIV, investigators may consider balancing the scientific rigor imposed by stringent inclusion criteria with the practical realities of children with HIV not always maintaining complete viral suppression while taking ART.

There are several recent pieces of evidence informing reservoir creation that may relate to our work here. First, from macaque studies, we know that rebound competent reservoirs are created extremely early but also appear to saturate [84]. HIV DNA set points are also established extremely early in humans [85]. Of many clinical variables tested in human ATI studies, viral load area under the curve during primary infection is the most correlated to the timing of viral rebound after ATI [86,87]. Relatedly, timing of ART initiation after acquisition seems to delicately dictate rebound kinetics after ATI – in a meta-analysis of 124 NHP animals from 10 independent studies, investigators found extremely early therapy actually increased rebound peak viremia until week 3, after which delaying ART led to increases in post-rebound setpoint viral levels [88]. Meanwhile, proviral sequencing suggests a continuum of seeding times, with a bias towards times closer to ART initiation [53,89,90]. Putting this evidence together with ours, we hypothesize that reservoir seeding pre-ART saturates such that qualitatively different processes of reservoir turnover may occur during treatment interruptions [91].

We propose that our new approach to incorporating active viremia into models of HIV DNA decay could help re-analyze prior cohorts. Because viremic CWH would be excluded from typical reservoir studies, reservoir decay properties in important CWH is unknown (e.g., those with known adherence that still struggle to suppress viremia [38]). We were able to directly compare the half-lives of infected cells estimated in suppressed and viremic participants, finding that intact proviruses decay faster than defectives in both groups. Moreover, the half-lives of infected cells that ultimately persist during ART were not significantly different between suppressed and viremic participants, suggesting that treatment interruptions do not strongly influence the long-term kinetics of reservoir persistence, though it is unknown if this holds true for other populations.

There are other limitations to our work. Sparser data meant confidence intervals in estimated decay rates for participants after 1 year of ART were wide and possibly inclusive of growing intact reservoirs at later stages. Because blood volumes from children are small, we measure HIV DNA per million T cells, vs per million CD4+ T cells as in some other studies. Yet our decay rate estimates do agree with most prior values, suggesting this denominator does not strongly bias results. Losing individuals to follow up is a typical problem for long-term studies and can also bias results. Thus, our original decay estimates apply to the types of individuals who can maintain long-term suppression – but our work highlights this caveat for most if not all other HIV reservoir studies. By including children who had viremia and found their long-term HIV DNA decay rates were not different, our work potentially expands the applicability of many studies. The model linking HIV RNA and DNA is based on prior work in adults but fits our pediatric data, both in the suppressed and viremic subsets. However, the assumption that a long-lived compartment is created continuously during viremia may not be accurate, as other studies suggest sequences might be more likely to be archived into the reservoir near the time of ART [53,89,90,92].

In the future, we hope to collect sequencing data to help interpret the results. For instance, it is unclear if treatment interruptions led to any drug resistance evolution and we cannot address whether this factor contributes to heterogeneity in decay patterns across individuals, though the present decay estimates are not notably more heterogeneous than in prior cohorts in children [10] or adults [64].

Studying children is particularly important because the early-life immune system might better-respond to curative interventions. Children have lower overall immune activation [2] and pediatric reservoirs appear less inducible [93], which could theoretically help or hinder therapies attempting to achieve a functional cure. Our findings suggest reservoir creation during treatment interruptions is relatively transient, but that over 8 years intact HIV DNA decays very slowly, and it is unknown what occurs beyond this time frame in CWH. Thus, interventions that can improve this trajectory would be critically important for the long-term prognosis of these children and models like this will be essential for assessing those interventions.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH)/University of Nairobi (UoN) Ethics and Research Committee for NCT00428116. Oral informed consent was obtained from each adult participant enrolling in the study; written informed consent was then obtained from the subset of those completing pediatric testing. Older children whose parents agreed provided written assent for the HIV test. At the time of this study, children ≥16 years (or emancipated minors > 14) could provide independent consent for HIV testing, while others required parental consent; these older ages were not included in this study.

Study cohort and sample collection

This study used archived samples collected between 2007-2017 from the Optimizing Pediatric HIV (OPH) cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. Procedures for enrollment and follow-up of this pediatric cohort have been described elsewhere [8]. Briefly, ART-naive infants <12 months old were enrolled at prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV clinics and pediatric wards, initiated ART, 42 were randomized into an ATI study (NCT00428116), and follow up was for ~10 years, including collection of blood samples that were separated into plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which were frozen or cryopreserved until use.

HIV RNA and DNA quantification

HIV RNA was previously quantified with the Gen-Probe HIV RNA assay that had a lower limit of detection of 150 copies/mL [8]. Data below those levels were set at 75 copies/mL, the midpoint of 0 and the threshold. Total and intact HIV proviruses were quantified using the cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay (CS-IPDA) as described previously [19,36]. Briefly, CS-IPDA was performed in triplicate. If no intact HIV proviruses were detected, additional replicates were performed until either intact proviruses were detected or a minimum of 1e5 cells were interrogated. DNA shearing rates are measured by the RPP30 reference assay, and both total and intact DNA levels reported if shearing <40%.

Population nonlinear mixed effects (pNLME) model fitting

We used population nonlinear mixed effects modeling (pNLME) implemented in Monolix (www.lixoft.eu) to estimate population rates and individual rates for each participant. In this approach each data type (Y) for each individual i at time j is modeled with exponential dynamics such that ln(Yij)=θiY×tij+Y0+ϵY. The initial condition is Y0 and the noise is modeled by ϵV~N0,σY2, where N denotes a normal distribution. This effectively leads to a log-normal distribution of estimated measurement error for the data type with its standard deviation σY. The only exception to this model was the model for viral load within the first year of therapy which used a biphasic model: Yij=ϵYY1expθiV1×tij+Y2expθiV2×tij. The pNLME approach also assumes that each individual-specific parameter ΘiY is drawn from a probability distribution with the median population parameters (fixed effects) ΘYpop and the random effects that define the individual-specific value: ηiY~N0,Ω, where Ω is the covariance matrix (admitting each parameter p ’s variance in the diagonal elements Ωp,p and the covariance between two different parameters p1 and p2 as the off diagonal elements Ωp1,p2). Parameters were modeled assuming log-normality for initial conditions, and normality for decay rates. Importantly, decay rate constants θiY were allowed to be positive or negative to allow for decay or expansion. Monolix calculates the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) of the measurement error standard deviation σY, the fixed effects vector ΘYpop and the elements of matrix Ω using the Stochastic Approximation of the Expectation Maximization (SAEM) algorithm embedded in the Monolix software. Individual parameters were selected using the mode of the conditional distribution f(Θi|Yij;ΘMLEYpop,ΩMLE) constructed by the MCMC algorithm in the Monolix software.

Time points for immune marker analysis

We selected 30 participants from the OPH cohort with at least 3 HIV DNA time points after 1 year of ART. We measured immune markers (Meso Scale Discovery custom 10-multiplex panel) from plasma samples at ART initiation (baseline), 6 months after ART initiation, and at HIV DNA time points (Fig 1). For 6 missing baseline measurements, we selected a sample within -3 to +3 months of starting ART. For 20 missing HIV DNA time points, we selected a plasma sample within 6 months of that time point. For >40 month missing time points, we selected the closest time point before or afterwards, for <24 month missing time points, we selected the closest time point afterwards.

Non naïve CD4+ T cell TCRβ sequencing

We identified 14 CWH from the suppressed subset with at least 3 HIV DNA time points after 1 year of ART. From this group, we selected 5 donors due to multiple available quality aliquots, participant IDs 49, 73, 78, 116, and 134. We isolated CD4+ T cells from total PBMCs using a negative selection magnetic bead kit (Miltenyi Biotec #130-096-533) then used a negative selection naïve T cell magnetic isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec #130-094-131) to separate non-naïve cells. The non-naïve cells are therefore PBMCs that are negative for: CD8a, CD14, CD15, CD16, CD19, CD36, CD56, CD123, TcRγ/δ, and CD235a AND positive for at least one of the following: CD25, CD45RO, and HLA-DR. Thus, it is possible they are CD45RO- but if so then they have either CD25 or HLA-DR as an activation marker. From these cells, DNA was isolated (Qiagen #69504) and TCRβ sequencing (to ultra-deep scale) was performed by Adaptive Biotechnology.

TCRβ clone dynamic calculations

To assess the rate of change in TCRβ clone size over time, we analyzed paired samples from 5 CWH taken at approximately 40 and 96 months after ART initiation. The proportional abundance of each TCRβ clone i was calculated as it’s observed abundance divided by the total number of cells pi=ai/n. To standardize comparisons across samples, resampled abundances were defined using multinomial sampling to a common sample size, âi a^i=Mpi,s where s =4900 was the lowest sample size across all 10 time points. Then, resampled abundance data from paired time points were merged on TCRβ amino acid sequences. The change in clone size over time was quantified by calculating the rate of change (ki), defined assuming exponential kinetics divided by the time interval Δt between the two samples in months: lna^it2a^it1/Δt=ki.

Mathematical model including HIV RNA levels into HIV DNA dynamics

We developed a model that grows from a basic viral dynamics formulation to describe HIV RNA and DNA simultaneously during periods of viremia and ART. Previously, models were successfully fit to HIV RNA decay data in PWH who initiated ART by assuming the existence of 3 types of infected cells with different lifespans [28,55,56,94]. Such a model can be expressed in several mathematical formulations, with slightly different mechanistic interpretations, but here we use:

S˙=αS−δSS−βSVI1˙=βSV−θ1I1−ϕ1I1+ξ2I2+ξ3I3I2˙=ϕ1I1−(θ2+ϕ2)I2I3˙=ϕ2I2−θ3I3V˙=πI1−γV−βSV (1)

where overdot denotes time derivative. Here, αS is the source of susceptible cells, δS the natural death rate of these cells, θs the clearance rate of each infected cell type s (which is the net rate from a balance of forces including proliferation, viral cytolytic death, and immune system killing and potentially others), ϕs represents a transition rate into a longer-lived infected cell type, ξs is the rate of reactivation into the I1 compartment, π the rate of viral production and γ the rate of natural viral clearance. Roughly, we imagine I1 as short-lived actively infected cells producing virus (approximately 1 day lifespan), I2 as medium-lived infected cells (with approximately 6 week lifespans and potentially in a pre-integration state as derived via prior modeling [55]), and I3 as long-lived/proliferating infected cells, approximating latency and resulting in very slow clearance (multi-year half-life).

Now, we make several simplifications based on the sampling frequency of the data and the scientific question we are addressing: what is the contribution of transient viremia to the HIV reservoir via treatment interruptions? The first simplification is that reduction of virions due to infection is negligible (i.e., the βSV term in the V˙ equation can be ignored). The second is that viral dynamics are fast enough compared to the rest of the system such that we can use a quasi-steady state approximation I1=γV/π=bVt. Finally, the replicative dynamics relating susceptible cells, I1 cells, and virus can be ignored in favor of directly utilizing the observed HIV RNA data Vt. This results in a highly simplified model

I2˙=ϕ1I1−θ2+ϕ2I2I3˙=ϕ2I2−θ3I3 (2)

We separately model intact and defective HIV DNA, so we have a copy of this system for intact and defective (noted with superscripts in Fig 4A).

Because of our main simplification, we do not directly model target cell limitation, nor do we consider reactivation into I1. However, the emergent viral loads we impute into the model likely are implicitly affected by these phenomena. Our approximation could be stated that the dynamics of I2 and I3 cells are an epiphenomenon whose dynamics can be effectively ignored in modeling the main viral dynamics. As evidence, many viral dynamics models fit to primary infection data without these compartments.

It is unclear whether infected cells with longer lifespans are created directly by infection or transition from a shorter lived compartment (our choice here). Additional data would be required to disambiguate these approaches. But, we did assess a mathematically different but ultimately very similar model in which the I2 and I3 compartments were generated independently in parallel via a fraction τ, leaving the equations as I2˙=τbVt−θ2I2 and I3˙=1−τbVt−θ3I3. This led to generally similar results because the b and ϕ terms are more rapid than clearance rates. Additionally, we explored a nonlinear reactivation term such as ξ3I3Vt such that increasing viremia increases activation into the more active pool [95]. However, this model became numerically unstable and often led to negative numbers due to the imputed viral load changes, so we opted to not use it in our more simplified implementation.

Fitting the model inclusive of viremia

To fit the model, we again used population nonlinear mixed effects modeling in Monolix where viremia was input as a “regressor” or external variable that changes the infected cell populations. We estimated rate parameters for each type (intact and defective) b,θ2,ϕ1,θ3,ϕ2 and the initial condition I20. The second initial condition was derived from a quasi-static approximation: I3=ϕ2I20/θ3. Parameters were assumed to follow log-normal distributions and noise was assumed to be constant on the log-scale. Intact HIV DNA that was not detected was set to censored value at 1/total cells assayed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical tests are noted in each use. Z-test is the difference of means (μ) divided by the square root of the sum of each standard error squared, i.e., Z=(μX−μY)/sX2+sY21/2, where standard error is the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size s=σ/N. P-values were computed by the cumulative probability distribution of a standard normal distribution at value Z. Whenever presented, box plots indicate medians, interquartile ranges (IQR), and whiskers indicate 1.5x IQR.

Supporting information

S1 Table. All rates for each population parameter estimated from the suppressed OPH subset using an exponential decay model (see Methods).

Rate is the mean population parameter rate (per month), SE is the standard error of each population parameter (standard deviation divided by square root of sample size, σ/√n), and RSE is the percent residual squared error, the ratio of SE to Value x 100%, which indicates better fit for lower values. Data types are HIV RNA, Intact and Defective HIV DNA, and CD4 count, where <1 and >1 indicate the period before and after 1 year of ART. Negative rates indicate decay whereas positive indicates expansion.

(XLSX)

ppat.1013003.s001.xlsx (9.4KB, xlsx)
S1 Fig. Number of follow up time points for HIV RNA, CD4 count and HIV DNA (intact and defective are the same).

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s002.tif (166.5KB, tif)
S2 Fig. HIV DNA in suppressed vs viremic subsets.

A) Intact and B) defective HIV DNA levels in the suppressed vs viremic subsets (suppressed criteria was HIV RNA levels dropping below 1000 copies/mL within 1 year of starting ART and remaining below 3000 copies/mL thereafter). n indicates number of time points in each boxplot. P-values are from one-sided Mann-Whitney U test comparing the boxes with the horizontal line. Box plots show medians, interquartile ranges and 1.5x interquartile ranges.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s003.tif (223.6KB, tif)
S3 Fig. Using data from the suppressed subset, comparison of intact (A) and defective (B) HIV DNA levels when they were detectable (but low, below our defined threshold of 3000 copies/mL) vs undetectable (note assay limit of detection was HIV RNA < 150 copies/mL).

n indicates number of time points in each box. There was no difference between intact and defective HIV DNA levels in participants with low but detectable HIV RNA vs completely undetectable HIV RNA. P-values are Mann-Whitney indicating differences between the two boxes with the horizontal line. Box plots show medians, interquartile ranges and 1.5x interquartile ranges.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s004.tif (180.6KB, tif)
S4 Fig. Relationship between HIV RNA viral load area under the curve (AUC) and final intact HIV DNA level.

We use a trapezoidal numerical integration to estimate the AUC up until the time of the final intact HIV DNA measurement and then compare this to the final measurement. The dot color indicates the final time point, so darker points are later in time and thus have higher AUC. But, there is not a strong statistical relationship, p=0.3 noted in panel title, and note p=0.9 for the identical analysis for defective HIV DNA.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s005.tif (187.4KB, tif)
S5 Fig. Longitudinal levels relative to birth of bulk CD4+ T cell counts suppressed subset OPH participants vs 3 historic pediatric studies that measured CD4+ T cell counts in children not living with HIV.

The studies are denoted by the marker, means are represented by dots and vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals as reported in the original studies. The thicker green line indicates the mean value averaged in 6 month windows for the OPH participants, and the thin green lines represent 95% confidence intervals on these estimates. In both OPH participants and historic controls there appears to be a slight rise in the first year of life and a gradual decay afterwards.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s006.tif (192.9KB, tif)
S6 Fig. Individual model fits (deriving from models shown in Fig 2) for 5 suppressed subset OPH participants with at least 5 longitudinal HIV DNA time points.

Top row axes indicate HIV RNA (left) and CD4 count (right). Jagged lines with small dots are observed data, solid lines are best model fits. Diamonds for intact HIV DNA indicate levels below limit of detection. The population trends hold for individuals.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s007.tif (343.4KB, tif)
S7 Fig. Association between individual kinetic rates for each data type (HIV RNA, CD4 count, intact and defective HIV DNA) and interval (<1 and >1 year of ART, HIV RNA is additionally split into 0-2 and 2-12 month phases noted by (1) and (2)). Data underlying boxes with significant correlation coefficients are shown separately in scatter plots with linear trendlines.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s008.tif (389KB, tif)
S8 Fig. Intact decay rates with different criteria for suppression.

A) Modeling data from participants who had HIV RNA levels below 300 copies/mL at observed time points after 1 year on ART. Left) Viral load levels. Right) Intact HIV DNA levels (colored dots/lines for each participant, matching VL) and mixed effects model decay estimate (black line = population mean, shaded gray = confidence intervals, the values are noted in brackets as [mean, lower 95% CI, upper 95%CI]. There were 7 children who had any intact time points given this criteria and only 2 child with more than 1 longitudinal time point. B) Same plots but HIV RNA < 1000 copies/mL. There were 17 children who had any intact time points given this criteria and 9 children with more than 1 longitudinal time point.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s009.tif (299.6KB, tif)
S9 Fig. Correlations among IL/GzB dynamics and against estimated kinetics rates.

A) Spearman correlation between 4 immune marker levels at baseline (at ART initiation) and during setpoint (average >1yr of ART). P values are noted for each correlation coefficient. B) Spearman correlation coefficient between immune marker levels and HIV RNA, DNA and CD4+ T cell kinetic rates estimated via pNLME models for 18 participants who had rate estimates for all data types. Baseline immune marker levels are compared against rates estimated from early (<1 yr) of ART and setpoint levels are compared against rates from long-term (>1 yr) ART. P values are noted for each correlation coefficient.

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s010.tif (256KB, tif)
S10 Fig. Relationship between initial sample size (total number of cells sequenced) and richness (number of unique clonotypes) observed in non-naïve CD4+ TCRβ sequencing. Circles indicate 40 month time points and squares indicate 96 month time points from 5 PWH (colors match Fig 3).

(TIF)

ppat.1013003.s011.tif (72.2KB, tif)
S1 Data. All viremia model fits (7 examples shown in Fig 4) from OPH participants with 3 or more longitudinal CS-IPDA measurements.

(PDF)

ppat.1013003.s012.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully recognize the study participants, as well as the clinical and administrative teams from the Optimizing Pediatric HIV (OPH) Cohort.

Data Availability

All data and code used to perform the analyses and modeling in this work is freely available from https://github.com/dbrvs/OPHmodeling

Funding Statement

Funding was provided by the NIH R01s HD023412 & HD094718 to DAL and GJS, K25 AI155224 and R01 AI186721-01 to DBR. LBC is supported by UM1AI164565. DBR is thankful for the support of the University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research (CFAR, P30 AI027757) through a New Investigator Award and a Supplement that initiated and funded this project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Goulder PJ, Lewin SR, Leitman EM. Paediatric HIV infection: the potential for cure. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(4):259–71. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berendam SJ, Nelson AN, Goswami R, Persaud D, Haigwood NL, Chahroudi A, et al. Pediatric HIV: the Potential of Immune Therapeutics to Achieve Viral Remission and Functional Cure. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(3):237–48. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00495-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Benki-Nugent S, Eshelman C, Wamalwa D, Langat A, Tapia K, Okinyi HM, et al. Correlates of age at attainment of developmental milestones in HIV-infected infants receiving early antiretroviral therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(1):55–61. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tagarro A, Domínguez-Rodríguez S, Cotton M, Otwombe K, Klein N, Lain MG, et al. High mortality following early initiation of antiretroviral therapy in infants living with HIV from three African countries. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;73:102648. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Violari A, Cotton MF, Gibb DM, Babiker AG, Steyn J, Madhi SA, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy and mortality among HIV-infected infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2233–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Persaud D, Palumbo PE, Ziemniak C, Hughes MD, Alvero CG, Luzuriaga K, et al. Dynamics of the resting CD4(+) T-cell latent HIV reservoir in infants initiating HAART less than 6 months of age. AIDS. 2012;26(12):1483–90. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283553638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Finzi D, Hermankova M, Pierson T, Carruth LM, Buck C, Chaisson RE, et al. Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Science. 1997;278(5341):1295–300. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wamalwa D, Benki-Nugent S, Langat A, Tapia K, Ngugi E, Moraa H, et al. Treatment interruption after 2-year antiretroviral treatment initiated during acute/early HIV in infancy. AIDS. 2016;30(15):2303–13. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Obregon-Perko V, Bricker KM, Mensah G, Uddin F, Rotolo L, Vanover D, et al. Dynamics and origin of rebound viremia in SHIV-infected infant macaques following interruption of long-term ART. JCI Insight. 2021;6(23):e152526. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.152526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Persaud D, Bryson Y, Nelson BS, Tierney C, Cotton MF, Coletti A, et al. HIV-1 reservoir size after neonatal antiretroviral therapy and the potential to evaluate antiretroviral-therapy-free remission (IMPAACT P1115): a phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study. Lancet HIV. 2024;11(1):e20–30. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00236-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain V, Hartogensis W, Bacchetti P, Hunt PW, Hatano H, Sinclair E, et al. Antiretroviral therapy initiated within 6 months of HIV infection is associated with lower T-cell activation and smaller HIV reservoir size. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(8):1202–11. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gunst J, Gohil J, Li J, Bosch R, White A, Seamon C, et al. Time to HIV viral rebound and frequency of post-treatment control after analytical interruption of antiretroviral therapy: An individual data-based meta-analysis of 24 prospective studies. 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5065764/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li JZ, Aga E, Bosch RJ, Pilkinton M, Kroon E, MacLaren L, et al. Time to Viral Rebound After Interruption of Modern Antiretroviral Therapies. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(5):865–70. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Conway JM, Meily P, Li JZ, Perelson AS. Unified model of short- and long-term HIV viral rebound for clinical trial planning. J R Soc Interface. 2021;18(177):20201015. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.1015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Persaud D, Gay H, Ziemniak C, Chen YH, Piatak M Jr, Chun T-W, et al. Absence of detectable HIV-1 viremia after treatment cessation in an infant. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(19):1828–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luzuriaga K, Gay H, Ziemniak C, Sanborn KB, Somasundaran M, Rainwater-Lovett K, et al. Viremic relapse after HIV-1 remission in a perinatally infected child. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):786–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1413931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bruner KM, Wang Z, Simonetti FR, Bender AM, Kwon KJ, Sengupta S, et al. A quantitative approach for measuring the reservoir of latent HIV-1 proviruses. Nature. 2019;566(7742):120–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0898-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Levy CN, Hughes SM, Roychoudhury P, Reeves DB, Amstuz C, Zhu H, et al. A highly multiplexed droplet digital PCR assay to measure the intact HIV-1 proviral reservoir. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2(4):100243. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cassidy NAJ, Fish CS, Levy CN, Roychoudhury P, Reeves DB, Hughes SM, et al. HIV reservoir quantification using cross-subtype multiplex ddPCR. iScience. 2021;25(1):103615. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gaebler C, Lorenzi JCC, Oliveira TY, Nogueira L, Ramos V, Lu C-L, et al. Combination of quadruplex qPCR and next-generation sequencing for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the HIV-1 latent reservoir. J Exp Med. 2019;216(10):2253–64. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Delporte M, Snippenberg W van, Blomme EE, Rutsaert S, Verschoore M, Smet ED, et al. Integrative assessment of total and intact HIV-1 reservoir by a five-region multiplexed Rainbow digital PCR assay. bioRxiv. 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.18.553846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reeves DB, Gaebler C, Oliveira TY, Peluso MJ, Schiffer JT, Cohn LB, et al. Impact of misclassified defective proviruses on HIV reservoir measurements. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4186. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39837-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Antar AA, Jenike KM, Jang S, Rigau DN, Reeves DB, Hoh R, et al. Longitudinal study reveals HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cell dynamics during long-term antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3543–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI135953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Peluso MJ, Bacchetti P, Ritter KD, Beg S, Lai J, Martin JN, et al. Differential decay of intact and defective proviral DNA in HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JCI Insight. 2020;5(4):e132997. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gandhi RT, Cyktor JC, Bosch RJ, Mar H, Laird GM, Martin A, et al. Selective Decay of Intact HIV-1 Proviral DNA on Antiretroviral Therapy. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(2):225–33. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cho A, Gaebler C, Olveira T, Ramos V, Saad M, Lorenzi JCC, et al. Longitudinal clonal dynamics of HIV-1 latent reservoirs measured by combination quadruplex polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(4):e2117630119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117630119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garcia-Broncano P, Maddali S, Einkauf KB, Jiang C, Gao C, Chevalier J, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy in neonates with HIV-1 infection restricts viral reservoir size and induces a distinct innate immune profile. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(520):eaax7350. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax7350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reeves DB, Duke ER, Wagner TA, Palmer SE, Spivak AM, Schiffer JT. A majority of HIV persistence during antiretroviral therapy is due to infected cell proliferation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4811. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06843-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cohn LB, da Silva IT, Valieris R, Huang AS, Lorenzi JCC, Cohen YZ, et al. Clonal CD4+ T cells in the HIV-1 latent reservoir display a distinct gene profile upon reactivation. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):604–9. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0017-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Simonetti FR, Zhang H, Soroosh GP, Duan J, Rhodehouse K, Hill AL, et al. Antigen-driven clonal selection shapes the persistence of HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(3):e145254. doi: 10.1172/JCI145254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nat Med. 2009;15(8):893–900. doi: 10.1038/nm.1972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang Z, Gurule EE, Brennan TP, Gerold JM, Kwon KJ, Hosmane NN, et al. Expanded cellular clones carrying replication-competent HIV-1 persist, wax, and wane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(11):E2575–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720665115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reeves DB, Rigau DN, Romero A, Zhang H, Simonetti FR, Varriale J, et al. Mild HIV-specific selective forces overlaying natural CD4+ T cell dynamics explain the clonality and decay dynamics of HIV reservoir cells. medRxiv. 2024:. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.13.24302704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.De Clercq J, De Scheerder M-A, Mortier V, Verhofstede C, Vandecasteele SJ, Allard SD, et al. Longitudinal patterns of inflammatory mediators after acute HIV infection correlate to intact and total reservoir. Front Immunol. 2024;14:1337316. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1337316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vandergeeten C, Fromentin R, Chomont N. The role of cytokines in the establishment, persistence and eradication of the HIV reservoir. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2012;23(4–5):143–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2012.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fish CS, Cassidy NAJ, Levy CN, Hughes SM, Jerome KR, Overbaugh J, et al. Protocol for high-throughput reservoir quantification across global HIV subtypes using a cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay. STAR Protoc. 2022;3(4):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Neary J, Fish CS, Cassidy NAJ, Wamalwa D, Langat A, Ngugi E, et al. Predictors of intact HIV DNA levels among children in Kenya. AIDS. 2023;37(6):871–6. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ásbjörnsdóttir KH, Hughes JP, Wamalwa D, Langat A, Slyker JA, Okinyi HM, et al. Differences in virologic and immunologic response to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1-infected infants and children. AIDS. 2016;30(18):2835–43. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haberer J, Mellins C. Pediatric adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009;6(4):194–200. doi: 10.1007/s11904-009-0026-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou S, Cluver L, Knight L, Edun O, Sherman G, Toska E. Longitudinal Trajectories of Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence and Associations With Durable Viral Suppression Among Adolescents Living With HIV in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2024;96(2):171–9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Slyker JA, Guthrie B, Pankau M, Tapia K, Wamalwa D, Benki-Nugent S, et al. Association Between Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Viremia And Human Immunodeficiency Virus DNA Levels in the Reservoir of Kenyan Infants Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy. J Infect Dis. 2021;223(11):1923–7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Strongin Z, Sharaf R, VanBelzen DJ, Jacobson JM, Connick E, Volberding P, et al. Effect of Short-Term Antiretroviral Therapy Interruption on Levels of Integrated HIV DNA. J Virol. 2018;92(12):e00285-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00285-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kuhn L, Barnabas S, Cotugno N, Peay H, Goulder P, Cotton M, et al. Analytical treatment interruption in children living with HIV: position statement from the EPIICAL consortium. Lancet HIV. 2024;11(10):e700–10. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00157-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kinloch NN, Ren Y, Conce Alberto WD, Dong W, Khadka P, Huang SH, et al. HIV-1 diversity considerations in the application of the Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA). Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):165. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20442-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Embree J, Bwayo J, Nagelkerke N, Njenga S, Nyange P, Ndinya-Achola J, et al. Lymphocyte subsets in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected and uninfected children in Nairobi. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(4):397–403. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200104000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shearer WT, Rosenblatt HM, Gelman RS, Oyomopito R, Plaeger S, Stiehm ER, et al. Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children from birth through 18 years of age: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1009 study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(5):973–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Comans-Bitter WM, de Groot R, van den Beemd R, Neijens HJ, Hop WC, Groeneveld K, et al. Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes in childhood. Reference values for lymphocyte subpopulations. J Pediatr. 1997;130(3):388–93. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70200-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barbehenn A, Shi L, Shao J, Hoh R, Hartig HM, Pae V, et al. Rapid Biphasic Decay of Intact and Defective HIV DNA Reservoir During Acute Treated HIV Disease. medRxiv. 2024. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.27.24304867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lavielle M. Mixed effects models for the population approach: models, tasks, methods and tools. CRC press; 2014.
  • 50.Reeves DB, Bacchus-Souffan C, Fitch M, Abdel-Mohsen M, Hoh R, Ahn H, et al. Estimating the contribution of CD4 T cell subset proliferation and differentiation to HIV persistence. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):6145. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41521-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Reeves DB, Duke ER, Hughes SM, Prlic M, Hladik F, Schiffer JT. Anti-proliferative therapy for HIV cure: a compound interest approach. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04160-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tettamanti Boshier FA, Reeves DB, Duke ER, Swan DA, Prlic M, Cardozo-Ojeda EF, et al. Substantial uneven proliferation of CD4+ T cells during recovery from acute HIV infection is sufficient to explain the observed expanded clones in the HIV reservoir. J Virus Erad. 2022;8(4):100091. doi: 10.1016/j.jve.2022.100091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pankau MD, Reeves DB, Harkins E, Ronen K, Jaoko W, Mandaliya K, et al. Dynamics of HIV DNA reservoir seeding in a cohort of superinfected Kenyan women. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(2):e1008286. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Perelson AS, Essunger P, Cao Y, Vesanen M, Hurley A, Saksela K, et al. Decay characteristics of HIV-1-infected compartments during combination therapy. Nature. 1997;387(6629):188–91. doi: 10.1038/387188a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cardozo EF, Andrade A, Mellors JW, Kuritzkes DR, Perelson AS, Ribeiro RM. Treatment with integrase inhibitor suggests a new interpretation of HIV RNA decay curves that reveals a subset of cells with slow integration. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(7):e1006478. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hill AL, Rosenbloom DIS, Nowak MA, Siliciano RF. Insight into treatment of HIV infection from viral dynamics models. Immunol Rev. 2018;285(1):9–25. doi: 10.1111/imr.12698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bengu N, Cromhout G, Adland E, Govender K, Herbert N, Lim N, et al. Sustained aviremia despite anti-retroviral therapy non-adherence in male children after in utero HIV transmission. Nat Med. 2024;30(10):2796–804. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03105-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Uprety P, Chadwick EG, Rainwater-Lovett K, Ziemniak C, Luzuriaga K, Capparelli EV, et al. Cell-Associated HIV-1 DNA and RNA Decay Dynamics During Early Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1-Infected Infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(12):1862–70. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Uprety P, Patel K, Karalius B, Ziemniak C, Chen YH, Brummel SS, et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 DNA Decay Dynamics With Early, Long-term Virologic Control of Perinatal Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(11):1471–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nelson BS, Tierney C, Persaud D, Jao J, Cotton MF, Bryson Y, et al. Infants Receiving Very Early Antiretroviral Therapy Have High CD4 Counts in the First Year of Life. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):e744–7. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Veldsman KA, Maritz J, Isaacs S, Katusiime MG, Janse van Rensburg A, Laughton B, et al. Rapid decline of HIV-1 DNA and RNA in infants starting very early antiretroviral therapy may pose a diagnostic challenge. AIDS. 2018;32(5):629–34. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Katusiime MG, Halvas EK, Wright I, Joseph K, Bale MJ, Kirby-McCullough B, et al. Intact HIV Proviruses Persist in Children Seven to Nine Years after Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in the First Year of Life. J Virol. 2020;94(4):e01519-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01519-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Massanella M, Puthanakit T, Leyre L, Jupimai T, Sawangsinth P, de Souza M, et al. Continuous Prophylactic Antiretrovirals/Antiretroviral Therapy Since Birth Reduces Seeding and Persistence of the Viral Reservoir in Children Vertically Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(3):427–38. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.White JA, Simonetti FR, Beg S, McMyn NF, Dai W, Bachmann N, et al. Complex decay dynamics of HIV virions, intact and defective proviruses, and 2LTR circles following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(6):e2120326119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120326119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Massanella M, Bender Ignacio RA, Lama JR, Pagliuzza A, Dasgupta S, Alfaro R, et al. Long-term effects of early antiretroviral initiation on HIV reservoir markers: a longitudinal analysis of the MERLIN clinical study. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(5):e198–209. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00010-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Luzuriaga K, Wu H, McManus M, Britto P, Borkowsky W, Burchett S, et al. Dynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in vertically infected infants. J Virol. 1999;73(1):362–7. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.1.362-367.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ajibola G, Garcia-Broncano P, Maswabi K, Bennett K, Hughes MD, Moyo S, et al. Viral Reservoir in Early-Treated Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children and Markers for Sustained Viral Suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(4):e997–1003. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Morris SE, Dziobek-Garrett L, Strehlau R, Schröter J, Shiau S, Anelone AJN, et al. Quantifying the Dynamics of HIV Decline in Perinatally Infected Neonates on Antiretroviral Therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;85(2):209–18. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Palumbo P, Wu H, Chadwick E, Ruan P, Luzuriaga K, Rodman J, et al. Virologic response to potent antiretroviral therapy and modeling of HIV dynamics in early pediatric infection. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(1):23–9. doi: 10.1086/518508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lee GQ, Khadka P, Gowanlock SN, Copertino DC Jr, Duncan MC, Omondi FH, et al. HIV-1 subtype A1, D, and recombinant proviral genome landscapes during long-term suppressive therapy. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):5480. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48985-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Buchholtz NVEJ, Nühn MM, de Jong TCM, Stienstra TAT, Reddy K, Ndung’u T, et al. Development of a highly sensitive and specific intact proviral DNA assay for HIV-1 subtype B and C. Virol J. 2024;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02300-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Vela LC, Carrere L, Naasz C, Kalavacherla S, Tan TS, de Armas L, et al. Profound reduction of HIV-1 reservoir cells over 3 decades of antiretroviral therapy started in early infancy. JCI Insight. 2024;10(1):e186550. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.186550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gunst JD, Goonetilleke N, Rasmussen TA, Søgaard OS. Immunomodulation with IL-7 and IL-15 in HIV-1 infection. J Virus Erad. 2023;9(3):100347. doi: 10.1016/j.jve.2023.100347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hartana CA, Garcia-Broncano P, Rassadkina Y, Lian X, Jiang C, Einkauf KB, et al. Immune correlates of HIV-1 reservoir cell decline in early-treated infants. Cell Rep. 2022;40(3):111126. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bale MJ, Katusiime MG, Wells D, Wu X, Spindler J, Halvas EK, et al. Early Emergence and Long-Term Persistence of HIV-Infected T-Cell Clones in Children. mBio. 2021;12(2):e00568-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00568-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sun W, Gao C, Hartana CA, Osborn MR, Einkauf KB, Lian X, et al. Phenotypic signatures of immune selection in HIV-1 reservoir cells. Nature. 2023;614(7947):309–17. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05538-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lian X, Gao C, Sun X, Jiang C, Einkauf KB, Seiger KW, et al. Signatures of immune selection in intact and defective proviruses distinguish HIV-1 elite controllers. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(624):eabl4097. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abl4097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lau JSY, Cromer D, Pinkevych M, Lewin SR, Rasmussen TA, McMahon JH, et al. Balancing Statistical Power and Risk in HIV Cure Clinical Trial Design. J Infect Dis. 2022;226(2):236–45. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Manning MR, Blazkova J, Justement JS, Shi V, Kennedy BD, Rai MA, et al. Timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation affects intact HIV reservoirs following analytical treatment interruption. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(20):e181632. doi: 10.1172/JCI181632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pankau MD, Wamalwa D, Benki-Nugent S, Tapia K, Ngugi E, Langat A, et al. Decay of HIV DNA in the Reservoir and the Impact of Short Treatment Interruption in Kenyan Infants. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;5(1):ofx268. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Clarridge KE, Blazkova J, Einkauf K, Petrone M, Refsland EW, Justement JS, et al. Effect of analytical treatment interruption and reinitiation of antiretroviral therapy on HIV reservoirs and immunologic parameters in infected individuals. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1):e1006792. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Julg B, Dee L, Ananworanich J, Barouch DH, Bar K, Caskey M, et al. Recommendations for analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions in HIV research trials-report of a consensus meeting. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(4):e259–68. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30052-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Immonen TT, Fennessey CM, Lipkey L, Thorpe A, Del Prete GQ, Lifson JD, et al. Transient viral replication during analytical treatment interruptions in SIV infected macaques can alter the rebound-competent viral reservoir. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(6):e1009686. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Keele BF, Okoye AA, Fennessey CM, Varco-Merth B, Immonen TT, Kose E, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy in SIV-infected rhesus macaques reveals a multiphasic, saturable dynamic accumulation of the rebound competent viral reservoir. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(4):e1012135. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ananworanich J, Chomont N, Eller LA, Kroon E, Tovanabutra S, Bose M, et al. HIV DNA Set Point is Rapidly Established in Acute HIV Infection and Dramatically Reduced by Early ART. EBioMedicine. 2016;11:68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mdluli T, Li Y, Pinyakorn S, Reeves DB, Cardozo-Ojeda EF, Yates A, et al. Acute HIV-1 infection viremia associate with rebound upon treatment interruption. Med. 2022;3(9):622-635.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Alexandre M, Prague M, Lhomme E, Lelièvre J-D, Wittkop L, Richert L, et al. Definition of Virological Endpoints Improving the Design of HIV Cure Strategies Using Analytical Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;79(6):1447–57. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pinkevych M, Docken SS, Okoye AA, Fennessey CM, Del Prete GQ, Pino M, et al. Timing of initiation of anti-retroviral therapy predicts post-treatment control of SIV replication. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(10):e1011660. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Brodin J, Zanini F, Thebo L, Lanz C, Bratt G, Neher RA, et al. Establishment and stability of the latent HIV-1 DNA reservoir. Elife. 2016;5:e18889. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Abrahams M-R, Joseph SB, Garrett N, Tyers L, Moeser M, Archin N, et al. The replication-competent HIV-1 latent reservoir is primarily established near the time of therapy initiation. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(513):eaaw5589. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw5589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Leyre L, Kroon E, Vandergeeten C, Sacdalan C, Colby DJ, Buranapraditkun S, et al. Abundant HIV-infected cells in blood and tissues are rapidly cleared upon ART initiation during acute HIV infection. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(533):eaav3491. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav3491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brooks K, Omondi FH, Liang RH, Sudderuddin H, Jones BR, Joy JB, et al. Proviral Turnover During Untreated HIV Infection Is Dynamic and Variable Between Hosts, Impacting Reservoir Composition on ART. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:719153. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.719153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dhummakupt A, Rubens JH, Anderson T, Powell L, Nonyane BA, Siems LV, et al. Differences in inducibility of the latent HIV reservoir in perinatal and adult infection. JCI Insight. 2020;5(4):e134105. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.134105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Palmer S, Maldarelli F, Wiegand A, Bernstein B, Hanna GJ, Brun SC, et al. Low-level viremia persists for at least 7 years in patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(10):3879–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800050105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kent SJ, Reece JC, Petravic J, Martyushev A, Kramski M, De Rose R, et al. The search for an HIV cure: tackling latent infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(7):614–21. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70043-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mary Kearney

20 Dec 2024

PPATHOGENS-D-24-02557

Intact HIV DNA decays in children with and without complete viral load suppression

PLOS Pathogens

Dear Dr. Reeves,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a minor revision of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process, particularly providing more information on validation of the CS-IPDA, a more clear presentation of the modeling, and additional emphasis on the biological and clinincal relevance of the findings.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 30 days Feb 18 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mary F Kearney

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Daniel B Reeves, Morgan Litchford, Carolyn Fish, Anna Farrell-Sherman, Nashwa Ahmed, Makayla Poindexter, Noah Cassidy, Jillian Neary, Dalton Walmawa, Agnes Langat, Daisy Chebet, Helen Moraa, Annukka Antar, Jenn Slyker, Sarah Benki-Nugent, Lillian Cohn, Joshua Schiffer, Julie Overbaugh, Grace John-Stewart, and Dara Lehman. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) Please provide an Author Summary. This should appear in your manuscript between the Abstract (if applicable) and the Introduction, and should be 150-200 words long. The aim should be to make your findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. Sample summaries can be found on our website under Submission Guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-parts-of-a-submission

3) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/figures

4) We have noticed that you have uploaded Supporting Information files, but you have not included a list of legends. Please add a full list of legends for your Supporting Information files after the references list.

5) Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOSu2019s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOSu2019s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility. Once you have responded and addressed all other outstanding technical requirements, you may resubmit your manuscript within Editorial Manager.

Potential Copyright Issues:

- Figure 1A; Please confirm whether you drew the images / clip-art within the figure panels by hand. If you did not draw the images, please provide a link to the source of the images or icons and their license / terms of use; or written permission from the copyright holder to publish the images or icons under our CC BY 4.0 license. Alternatively, you may replace the images with open source alternatives. See these open source resources you may use to replace images / clip-art:

- https://commons.wikimedia.org

- https://openclipart.org/.

6) Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.".

If you did not receive any funding for this study, please simply state: u201cThe authors received no specific funding for this work.u201d

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: In this interesting study, Reeves et al. measured plasma HIV RNA levels, CD4+ T cell counts, and the levels of intact and defective HIV DNA proviruses using the cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay in samples from 120 Kenyan children living with HIV (CWH). The study found that intact proviruses decayed faster than defective proviruses during both the first year of ART and over a longer period (years 1-8). Notably, in children who did not maintain viral suppression, modeling of HIV RNA and DNA revealed that although HIV DNA levels could transiently increase, intact proviral genomes were not significantly affected by brief treatment interruptions.

This study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of intact and defective proviruses during the early years of life in children with HIV. It is particularly strong in its inclusion of data from children who did not remain virally suppressed, a group that represents a significant fraction of CWH. One of the most notable findings is the faster decay of intact HIV DNA compared to defective DNA in both the early (<1 year) and long-term (1-8 years) treatment periods. The authors also suggest that transient increases in HIV RNA, likely due to treatment interruptions, do not have a lasting impact on the long-term dynamics of the HIV reservoir.

Overall, this study is well-conducted, and its findings are both novel and insightful. However, I have several suggestions that may enhance the clarity and impact of the manuscript:

Reviewer #2: In this large study of 120 Kenyan children, the researchers examined the decay of intact proviruses in children who initiated ART in infancy between 1-12 months of age and maintaining different levels of virologic suppression. A cross-subtype intact proviral DNA assay was used to measure intact proviruses. The authors compared the decay of intact and defective proviruses between 55 children with perinatal HIV who had “durable suppression” and 65 who had non-suppressed viremia, supposedly due to ART ART-interruptions, although confirmation of non-suppressed viremia from ART interruption vs. intermittent ART is not verified. With the CS-IPDA, they found differential decay of intact and defectives with half-lives, with intact proviruses showing faster clearance than defective proviruses of 3 and 9 months, respectively. Ongoing decay of intact proviruses was found with a mean half-life of 22 months—while defective DNA showed no decay.

The authors also went on to examine TCRβ clones in a subset of five children—where they discussed that CD4+ TCR β clones wax and waned in patterns more similar to cells with defective proviruses. Importantly, they report on despite ART interruptions and associations with increase in total HIV-1 DNA that intact proviral load did not increase significantly in children-, a finding that is relevant to the field of HIV remission and cure research for children where ART interruptions are required to detect remission.

Overall comments:

This is an important study that fills knowledge gaps on the decay dynamics of cell-associated HIV DNA in perinatal infections, with respect to intact and defective proviruses and as a function of states of virologic suppression. A state-of-the art assay—a cross-subtype Intact proviral HIV DNA assay was used, which the authors’ group has direct expertise. A well-characterized cohort of children are studied. The expertise on the perspectives from adult cohorts is also a study strength.

Critiques:

• The calculated half-lives of intact and defective proviruses and overall study findings need consideration for the limitations of the CS-IPDA, with respect with how the primers were inferred—from historic sequences in Los Alamos—I believe—

o Perhaps the authors can provide any unpublished data on further validation of the CS-IPDA assay from direct analyses of proviral landscape single genome sequences on the cohort—in other words—some validation of the sensitivity and specificity for HIV subtype A , including positive and negative predictive value, as was done for other IPDA assays—Bruner et al., Bucholtz et al and Lee et al.

• In Figure 1—the suppressed subset—while with lower levels of viremia and area under the curve for viremia than the viremic subset, still appear to have ongoing viremia in the 2-3 log range over the time course of treatment, which poses a challenge for more precisely quantifying HIV reservoirs.

• Additionally, within the first two years of ART, and with non-suppressed viremia, episomal HIV DNA can contributes to the total and intact proviral load.

o Please provide an explanation for how the models account for changes in 2LTR circles in the first two years of ART

• CD4+ T cell clonality data was done on a very small subset of the population—N=5, while these data are interesting—it seems insufficient to make meaning conclusions about HIV DNA kinetics

o The conclusion—lines 308-309 seem strong---“We determined that that non--naïve CD4+ T cell clone kinetics could explain defective but not intact HIV DNA, suggesting intact proviruses influence the death rate of their carrier cells”.

• The section on modeling transient rises in HIV DNA during RNA viremia is confusing to this reviewer as the deeply latent (l3) compartment in the model seems not applicable given the persistent viremic state of the participants; it is also unclear what the contribution of selected drug-resistant HIV will perform in this model. Hence the conclusion on page 8, lines 275 and 276 is unclear—“Importantly, model projections indicated that periods of viremia were strongly associated 276 with rises in 2 but not 3 cells (the more deeply latent reservoir)”—how is the deeply latent reservoir inferred here?

Overall. an important set of data to the field of pediatric HIV infection dynamics, but limited by the non-suppressed nature of the cohort, the use of a CS-IPDA with no provision on PPV and NPV on subtype A infection, and reporting on assay performance across 120 participants. The mathematical model on reservoir dynamics is flawed by the mere lack of suppression in the cohort since not all that is intact is likely to seed the reservoir.

Reviewer #3: The study by Reeves et al. Lehman addresses several important questions regarding CWH. The authors aptly point out to the “gold-standard” of HIV cure strategies involve ATI. Placed in the context of ATI in CWH, it is invaluable to understand intact HIV DNA dynamics in this population. The manuscript was well-written and thoughtful. Some specific comments follow, but most fall under the modeling.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1. The definitions for “suppressed” and “viremic” participants are somewhat unclear. While I understand the post-stratification analysis presented in Figure S1, I believe it would be more appropriate to define viral suppression using a more stringent criterion, such as stratifying participants based on the area under the curve (AUC) of viral loads. Alternatively, how would the results change if a stricter definition of suppression were applied (e.g., <2 blips total, with viral loads <400 copies/mL)?

2. In several sections, the paper reads like a statistical analysis, but the biological implications and clinical relevance of the findings should be emphasized more. For instance, it is unclear why the authors compare “viral load decay from months 2-12 of ART” with “intact HIV DNA decay during year 0-1 of ART.” I recommend focusing on a smaller number of more meaningful comparisons. Additionally, correlations that did not reach statistical significance (e.g., Figure S6) should likely be removed, as they detract from the key findings.

3. The analysis of cytokine correlations, particularly in Figure S7, may not be highly relevant to the core focus of the study. These correlations seem to dilute the more compelling associations observed between Granzyme B (GzB) and faster viral load decay, and between IL-15 and the faster decay of intact proviruses. Since these associations did not survive multiple comparison corrections, their inclusion may need reconsideration.

4. The rationale for comparing the dynamics of intact and defective proviral DNA with TCR clonal dynamics (Figure 3F) is unclear. Given that clonal proliferation and contraction essentially balance out (i.e., homeostasis), and the observed decay in intact DNA (as reported previously), it is not surprising that these phenomena are largely independent. The statement that “defective DNA kinetics resemble CD4 count” (line 237) is not very conclusive and may be omitted.

5. The modeling portion of the study presents interesting conclusions but could benefit from clearer presentation. While the main conclusions outlined in lines 278-281 are understandable, the data supporting these statements should be presented more clearly. Figures 4C and D are difficult to interpret, and statistical support for the authors’ claims is needed. Was the modeling analysis necessary to demonstrate that short-term viremia does not permanently reseed the reservoir? Could this conclusion be drawn more simply by analyzing the longitudinal data already presented in the study?

Reviewer #2: see above

Reviewer #3: None.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. It would be helpful to place the results in context with other studies on the dynamics of HIV reservoir markers in the early years of life: Veldsman et al. AIDS 2018; Katussime et al. J Virol 2020; Massanella et al. Clin Infect Dis 2021. This would provide a clearer understanding of how the findings contribute to the broader field.

2. Line 84: “CHW” should be corrected to “CWH.”

3. Line 221: “Repertoire sizes ranged from 4,904 to 61,288 sequences” – Is this referring to unique clonotypes or the total number of TCR sequences obtained?

4. Throughout the manuscript, the authors report HIV DNA levels per million T cells (i.e., CD4 and CD8). This is an unconventional method, and it would be helpful to clarify whether these measures were performed in PBMCs, T cells, or specifically in CD4+ T cells.

5. In Figure S7 and the associated correlation matrices, it would be useful to include p-values to provide transparency on the statistical significance of the reported associations.

6. The manuscript refers to “non-naïve cells.” It would be helpful to clarify whether this refers to CD45RA- or CD45RO+ cells, to ensure accuracy.

7. Granzyme B is not technically a cytokine, but rather an effector molecule or cytotoxin. This distinction should be clarified.

8. Line 345 mentions that the cells used for TCR sequencing were “resting” non-naïve T cells, but this contradicts the description in the methods section. The authors should reconcile these two statements to ensure consistency.

Reviewer #2: see above

Reviewer #3: 1. While the authors offer evidence of what subtypes are predominantly found in study population, is there any sequenced based evidence to confirm that this is consistent. This would also ultimately support the use of CS-IPDA within the tested subtypes.

2. Do the authors have plasma RNA (or DNA) sequence data from the suppressed subset where viremic episodes occurred, or in the viremic subset, to compare how and at what level, ongoing rounds of viral replication occurred? It would be interesting to consider the diversification of the virus since presumably the virus in plasma before ATI is what is observed in rebound viremia.

3. The modeling methods are quite nice. In parts a bit of an oversimplification but it appears that the authors intended this to enjoy some relaxed fits within modeling the data. Some specific points:

3A. Quite pedantic, but please define what “reservoir” and “latent reservoir” refer to in your study. I find by doing so lessens any squabbles. One can easily argue that the “reservoir” is that only of intact replication-competent proviruses. And by “latent”, referring to transcriptionally-silent or just all infected cells in the resting memory T cell phenotype? Personally, defective proviruses fall outside of the reservoir for this Reviewer, but in the context of the model and how the authors incorporate it, it is appropriate.

3B. Lines 529-548. Perhaps it can be supplemental, but the phrase “guesses” are interesting to use here. Did the authors use any a priori? How were the different models assessed—through progressive complexity and evaluated by AIC etc.? Why were the SDs assumed to be 1/10 mean?

3B.1. In general, the many assumptions and “guesses” could leave uninformed readers with some skepticism as to how the models were built and utilized. And ideas as the “passenger” hypothesis which (currently) does not include a reference that a reader could go back to, is something that needs to be defined.

3B.2. An overall suggestion is to use simplified jargon to support the decisions would be highly valuable and add definitions were appropriate.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Deborah Persaud, MD

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors of applicable studies deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Mary Kearney

21 Feb 2025

Dear Dr. Reeves,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Intact HIV DNA decays in children with and without complete viral load suppression' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Mary F Kearney

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Susan Ross

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Mary Kearney

Dear Dr Reeves,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Intact HIV DNA decays in children with and without complete viral load suppression," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. All rates for each population parameter estimated from the suppressed OPH subset using an exponential decay model (see Methods).

    Rate is the mean population parameter rate (per month), SE is the standard error of each population parameter (standard deviation divided by square root of sample size, σ/√n), and RSE is the percent residual squared error, the ratio of SE to Value x 100%, which indicates better fit for lower values. Data types are HIV RNA, Intact and Defective HIV DNA, and CD4 count, where <1 and >1 indicate the period before and after 1 year of ART. Negative rates indicate decay whereas positive indicates expansion.

    (XLSX)

    ppat.1013003.s001.xlsx (9.4KB, xlsx)
    S1 Fig. Number of follow up time points for HIV RNA, CD4 count and HIV DNA (intact and defective are the same).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s002.tif (166.5KB, tif)
    S2 Fig. HIV DNA in suppressed vs viremic subsets.

    A) Intact and B) defective HIV DNA levels in the suppressed vs viremic subsets (suppressed criteria was HIV RNA levels dropping below 1000 copies/mL within 1 year of starting ART and remaining below 3000 copies/mL thereafter). n indicates number of time points in each boxplot. P-values are from one-sided Mann-Whitney U test comparing the boxes with the horizontal line. Box plots show medians, interquartile ranges and 1.5x interquartile ranges.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s003.tif (223.6KB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Using data from the suppressed subset, comparison of intact (A) and defective (B) HIV DNA levels when they were detectable (but low, below our defined threshold of 3000 copies/mL) vs undetectable (note assay limit of detection was HIV RNA < 150 copies/mL).

    n indicates number of time points in each box. There was no difference between intact and defective HIV DNA levels in participants with low but detectable HIV RNA vs completely undetectable HIV RNA. P-values are Mann-Whitney indicating differences between the two boxes with the horizontal line. Box plots show medians, interquartile ranges and 1.5x interquartile ranges.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s004.tif (180.6KB, tif)
    S4 Fig. Relationship between HIV RNA viral load area under the curve (AUC) and final intact HIV DNA level.

    We use a trapezoidal numerical integration to estimate the AUC up until the time of the final intact HIV DNA measurement and then compare this to the final measurement. The dot color indicates the final time point, so darker points are later in time and thus have higher AUC. But, there is not a strong statistical relationship, p=0.3 noted in panel title, and note p=0.9 for the identical analysis for defective HIV DNA.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s005.tif (187.4KB, tif)
    S5 Fig. Longitudinal levels relative to birth of bulk CD4+ T cell counts suppressed subset OPH participants vs 3 historic pediatric studies that measured CD4+ T cell counts in children not living with HIV.

    The studies are denoted by the marker, means are represented by dots and vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals as reported in the original studies. The thicker green line indicates the mean value averaged in 6 month windows for the OPH participants, and the thin green lines represent 95% confidence intervals on these estimates. In both OPH participants and historic controls there appears to be a slight rise in the first year of life and a gradual decay afterwards.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s006.tif (192.9KB, tif)
    S6 Fig. Individual model fits (deriving from models shown in Fig 2) for 5 suppressed subset OPH participants with at least 5 longitudinal HIV DNA time points.

    Top row axes indicate HIV RNA (left) and CD4 count (right). Jagged lines with small dots are observed data, solid lines are best model fits. Diamonds for intact HIV DNA indicate levels below limit of detection. The population trends hold for individuals.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s007.tif (343.4KB, tif)
    S7 Fig. Association between individual kinetic rates for each data type (HIV RNA, CD4 count, intact and defective HIV DNA) and interval (<1 and >1 year of ART, HIV RNA is additionally split into 0-2 and 2-12 month phases noted by (1) and (2)). Data underlying boxes with significant correlation coefficients are shown separately in scatter plots with linear trendlines.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s008.tif (389KB, tif)
    S8 Fig. Intact decay rates with different criteria for suppression.

    A) Modeling data from participants who had HIV RNA levels below 300 copies/mL at observed time points after 1 year on ART. Left) Viral load levels. Right) Intact HIV DNA levels (colored dots/lines for each participant, matching VL) and mixed effects model decay estimate (black line = population mean, shaded gray = confidence intervals, the values are noted in brackets as [mean, lower 95% CI, upper 95%CI]. There were 7 children who had any intact time points given this criteria and only 2 child with more than 1 longitudinal time point. B) Same plots but HIV RNA < 1000 copies/mL. There were 17 children who had any intact time points given this criteria and 9 children with more than 1 longitudinal time point.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s009.tif (299.6KB, tif)
    S9 Fig. Correlations among IL/GzB dynamics and against estimated kinetics rates.

    A) Spearman correlation between 4 immune marker levels at baseline (at ART initiation) and during setpoint (average >1yr of ART). P values are noted for each correlation coefficient. B) Spearman correlation coefficient between immune marker levels and HIV RNA, DNA and CD4+ T cell kinetic rates estimated via pNLME models for 18 participants who had rate estimates for all data types. Baseline immune marker levels are compared against rates estimated from early (<1 yr) of ART and setpoint levels are compared against rates from long-term (>1 yr) ART. P values are noted for each correlation coefficient.

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s010.tif (256KB, tif)
    S10 Fig. Relationship between initial sample size (total number of cells sequenced) and richness (number of unique clonotypes) observed in non-naïve CD4+ TCRβ sequencing. Circles indicate 40 month time points and squares indicate 96 month time points from 5 PWH (colors match Fig 3).

    (TIF)

    ppat.1013003.s011.tif (72.2KB, tif)
    S1 Data. All viremia model fits (7 examples shown in Fig 4) from OPH participants with 3 or more longitudinal CS-IPDA measurements.

    (PDF)

    ppat.1013003.s012.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: reviewerresponse.docx

    ppat.1013003.s013.docx (39.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data and code used to perform the analyses and modeling in this work is freely available from https://github.com/dbrvs/OPHmodeling


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES