Skip to main content
Regenerative Therapy logoLink to Regenerative Therapy
. 2025 Apr 7;29:352–363. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.03.007

Targeting p53-p21 signaling to enhance mesenchymal stem cell regenerative potential

Ahsas Goyal a, Muhammad Afzal b, Nawaid Hussain Khan c, Kavita Goyal d, Suresh Kumar Srinivasamurthy e, Gaurav Gupta f,g, K Benod Kumar h, Haider Ali i, Mohit Rana j, Ling Shing Wong k, Vinoth Kumarasamy l,, Vetriselvan Subramaniyan m
PMCID: PMC12004386  PMID: 40248767

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are properties of self-renewal and differentiation potentials and thus are very appealing to regenerative medicine. Nevertheless, their therapeutic potential is frequently constrained by senescence, limited proliferation, and stress-induced apoptosis. The key role of the p53–p21 biology in MSC biology resides in safeguarding genomic stability while promoting senescence and limiting regenerative capacity upon over-activation demonstrated. This pathway is a key point for improving MSC function and exploiting the inherent limitations. Recent advances indicate that senescence can be delayed by targeting the p53-p21 signaling and improved MSC proliferation and differentiation capacity. PFT-α pharmacological agents transiently inhibit p53 from increasing proliferation and lineage-specific differentiation, while antioxidants such as hydrogen-rich saline and epigallocatechin 3 gallate (EGCG) suppress oxidative stress and attenuate p53 p21 signaling. Genetic tools like CRISPR-Cas9 and RNA interference also precisely modulate TP53 and CDKN1A expression to optimize MSC functionality. The interplay of p53-p21 with pathways like Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK further highlights opportunities for combinatorial therapies to enhance MSC resilience and regenerative outcomes. This review aims to offer a holistic view of how p53–p21 targeting can further the regenerative potential of MSCs, resolving senescence, proliferation, and stress resilience towards advanced therapeutics built on MSCs.

Keywords: Mesenchymal stem cells, p53-p21 signaling, Senescence, Proliferation, Apoptosis, Regenerative medicine, Therapeutic strategies

1. Introduction

Among other commonly used cells, MSCs are multipotent stromal cells capable of differentiating into different cell types, including osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes, and it is imperative in regenerative medicine [1]. Due to their unique properties (self-renewal, immunomodulation, tissue repair), MSCs have been identified as promising candidates for treating degenerative diseases, injuries, and immunomodulation-related disorders [2]. Nevertheless, their enormous potential therapeutic effect is hampered by several critical challenges associated with the senescent, limited proliferative potential, and environmental stress sensitivity of these cells [3]. The senescence that limits MSC-based therapy typically occurs during in vitro expansion and is characterized by reduced proliferation, poorly differentiated cells, and upregulation of senescence markers such as p53, p21, and β galactosidase [4]. The presence of senescent MSCs reduces their regenerative capacity and secretes proinflammatory cytokines, which aggravate tissue damage [5]. Functional impairment of MSCs occurs through oxidative stress-induced senescence by pathways including the SIRT1/p53/p21 axis and can be reversed by antioxidants [6]. In addition, the culture of MSC for a long duration leads to a reduction in MSC proliferative capacity, which is undesirable in large-scale expansion needed for clinical applications [7]. MSC dysfunction is exacerbated by environmental stressors, which induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence through the activation of pathways that pertain to these responses [8]. It can also prevent acetyl-p53 and p21 expression, preserve MSC viability, and enhance therapeutic capabilities by reducing oxidative stress [9]. As inflammatory stress adds insult to injury, MSC function is further disrupted through activation of pathways like TLR4/NF-κB that drive senescence through p53 p21 dependent pathways [10]. These challenges suggest that immunosuppression-linked senescence and stress pathways have greater potential for rather than hinder the therapeutic potential of MSCs [11].

MSC biology depends on the p53-p21 signaling pathway functioning as both a protector and a barrier [12]. p53 is known as the guardian of the genome, and p21 as its downstream effector, both mediate cell cycle arrest in response to stress, DNA damage, and oncogenic signals to prevent the propagation of damaged cells [13]. This pathway helps maintain genomic stability and attenuate the risk of tumorigenesis, but activation of this pathway leads to senescence, apoptosis, and decreased repair capacity [14]. Transient inhibition of p53 can improve MSC proliferation and enhance their differentiation to specific lineages, providing a novel means of improving therapeutic outcomes [15]. On the other hand, the therapeutic value of activating p53-p21 signaling is presented in some cancers, such as apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, to control tumor progression [16]. This dual role highlights the importance of pathway precision modulation for clinical applications [17]. New avenues for modulating p53-p21 signalling through genetic and pharmacological tools have been opened by advances in genetic and pharmacological tools [18]. CRISPR Cas9-based gene editing technologies now permit finely tuned modulation of TP53 and CDKN1A expression, allowing researchers to tailor the response of MSCs [19]. RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have also been used to modulate p53 and p21 expression, reduce stress responses, and improve MSC viability [20]. RNAi targeting ribosomal stress regulators stabilize p53 and induce senescence, highlighting the interconnected nature of p53 regulation and cellular homeostasis [21]. These approaches offer precise methods to address senescence and stress induced apoptosis in MSCs [22].

The efficacy of some pharmacological agents targeting p53–p21 signaling has been shown in MSC rejuvenation and cancer treatment [23]. Small molecule suppression of p53 delays senescence and increases MSC proliferation [24]. Oxidative stress, which decreases antioxidant levels and increases p53-p21 signalling, impairs MSC functionality and is corrected by downregulating p53-p21 signalling through antioxidants [25]. The versatility of pharmacological interventions is illustrated by the compounds, such as cholesterol, that reduce senescence by modulating autophagy and the ROS/p53/p21 axis [26]. Agents that downregulate p53-p21 or SASP factors diminish tumour-promoting behaviours and limit senescence associated with cancer progression in cancer therapy [27].

This review presents mechanisms of regulation of p53-p21 signaling and its implication in MSC biology. This review focuses on how targeted strategies, including genetic, pharmacological, and combinatorial approaches, highlight how the precise modulation of p53-p21 can overcome senescence, impaired proliferation, and stress-induced apoptosis.

2. Overview of p53-p21 signaling pathway

The p53-p21 signaling pathway is a central regulator of cell response to DNA and oxidative stress, essential for maintaining genomic stability and cellular fate [28]. The molecular safeguard responds to DNA damage, oncogenic stress, and other cellular insults to eventually control cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis of damaged cells to stop the propagation of such cells [29]. This pathway is an essential area for further exploration of its MSC biology, and the potential regenerative implications and knowledge of molecular mechanisms and biological interactions of this pathway are required. The p53 tumor suppressor protein, a transcription factor activated by diverse stress signals, including DNA damage, oxidative stress, and oncogenic signals, acts at the heart of the p53-p21 pathway [30]. Although the molecular pathway leading to p53 activation following IR was elusive, upon its activation, p53 translocates to the nucleus, binds to the promoter regions of target genes, including CDKN1A that encodes the p21 protein, a key effector of p53 mediated responses [31]. p21 inhibits cyclin-CDK complexes, preventing cell cycle progression from the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints to allow time for DNA repair or, if DNA is irreparably damaged, senescence occurs [32]. The pathway also contains feedback mechanisms. For instance, p53 has a negative feedback loop through MDM2, a p53 target gene that promotes p53 degradation by ubiquitin-mediated degradation, constituting a tightly controlled regulatory loop [33]. It maintains that balance so cells can undergo the appropriate activity of p53, modulating the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in physiological conditions [34].

DNA damage, repair, apoptosis, and senescence are associated intricately with the p53-p21 pathway [35]. Normally, p53 is p21 positive and is activated by sensors such as ATM and ATR on DNA damage, stopping the cell's cycle with p21 through a cascade [36]. If repair mechanisms fail, p53 shifts from stimulating cell cycle arrest to activating pro-apoptotic genes BAX and PUMA, thereby promoting programmed cell death [37]. p53 has dual functionality to safeguard cellular integrity, highlighting the p53 [38]. Persistently activated p53 and p21 promote senescence in which p53 and p21 expression leads to irreversible cell cycle arrest and increased expression of the β galactosidase marker of senescence-associated β gal and secretion of inflammatory cytokines [39]. Senescence functions as an antiapoptotic tumor suppressor, yet senescence accumulation in MSCs during in vitro expansion reduces their regenerative function [40]. Consequently, the balance between cell survival, repair, and elimination is important to maintain cellular homeostasis [41].

The p53-p21 pathway is double-edged in MSC. On one hand, it shields MSCs from genomic instability and potential transformation by not allowing stalled DNA polymerases or other damaged cells to multiply [42]. However, over-activation of this pathway, especially in oxidative stress or prolonged culture, induces senescence and regenerative capacity decline [43]. Senescent MSCs have elevated p53 and p21, leading to reduced proliferation, impaired differentiation, and increased secretion of inflammatory factors [44]. The pathway also plays a role in the survival of MSC under stress [45]. p53 and p21 are inappropriately activated in many oxidative and/or inflammatory environments that can subsequently lead to the apoptotic death of transplanted MSCs [46]. This highlights the need for strategies to modulate the p53-p21 pathway to improve MSC resistance and functionality.

3. p53-p21 signaling and MSC function

3.1. Senescence and aging in MSCs

Due to MSC's self-renewing and differentiation capacities, these cells are invaluable for regenerative medicine [47]. However, senescence, an irreversible cell cycle arrest often caused by long culture or environmental stress, dramatically limits their therapeutic potential [48]. The process is reduced proliferation, impaired differentiation, and increased p53, p21, and β galactosidase [49]. Numerous interconnected drivers of senescence include oxidative stress, DNA damage, and chronic inflammation, which can activate the pathways of p53-p21 and p16-pRB, among others [50]. Moreover, these mechanisms impede MSC function and restrict the scalability and efficacy of MSCs in clinical applications [51]. To advance MSC-based therapies, it is necessary to understand and target these drivers [52]. Induction of DNA damage and activation of p53-p21 signalling are other major ways of MSC senescence being driven by oxidative stress [53]. In both a protecting and a barrier capacity, this pathway protects genomic stability and a barrier, invoking senescence in response to persistent stress [54]. Xiang et al. further illustrated this duality by showing that TRLs aggravate the senescence of MSCs through the SIRT1/p53/p21 axis. Here, we found that a combined increase in p53 and p21 from abnormal ROS accumulation and reduced SIRT1 expression impeded MSC proliferation as shown in Fig. 1. [55]. Similarly, Zhang et al. demonstrated that hydrogen-rich saline mitigates oxidative damage by reducing ROS and downregulating p53 and p21, thereby enhancing MSC proliferation and differentiation. This study underscores the potential of antioxidants to counteract stress-induced senescence and suggests that interventions targeting oxidative stress could provide a conceptual framework for delaying MSC ageing [56]. While oxidative stress is a key driver, chronic inflammation compounds MSC ageing through sustained activation of inflammatory signalling pathways, including TLR4/MyD88-NF-κB and p53-p21 [57]. Feng et al. demonstrated that repeated exposure of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) triggered senescence by activating TLR4-mediated NF-κB and p53/p21 pathways. This inflammatory environment increased senescence markers and disrupted cellular morphology and differentiation potential [58].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Oxidative Stress-Induced Senescence: Role of ROS, SIRT1, and p53-p21 Pathway. This diagram illustrates the relationship between oxidative stress, cellular senescence, and the role of key molecular regulators. The central element, reactive oxygen species (ROS), is elevated due to triggers such as TRL (a stressor). Antioxidants like NAC (N-acetylcysteine) can inhibit ROS accumulation, mitigating its downstream effects. Elevated ROS levels lead to a decrease in SIRT1 activity, a critical regulator of cellular stress resistance. This reduction enhances the levels of Ac-p53/p53 (acetylated p53) and p21, two markers that promote cellular senescence.

MSC senescence also plays a pivotal role in the progression of autoimmune and haematological disorders, where senescence impairs immunomodulatory functions [59]. Gu et al. observed that bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs) from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients exhibited elevated p53 and p21 levels, leading to reduced proliferation and increased senescence [60]. Similarly, Fei et al. showed that p53/p21-induced senescence in BM-MSCs from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients impaired hematopoietic support, suggesting that targeting this pathway could improve MSC-based interventions for haematological disorders [61].

The complexity of MSC aging is further underscored by interactions between p53/p21 and other signalling pathways [62]. Zhang et al. revealed that hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling exacerbates senescence in lupus-associated BM-MSCs, while β-catenin inhibitors reversed these effects and restored MSC proliferation [63]. Additionally, Deryabin et al. highlighted the crosstalk between the p53/p21 and MAPK pathways under oxidative stress. Their study showed that MAPK inhibition elevated p53/p21 levels, leading to senescence, whereas p53 inhibition enhanced MAPK activity [64]. Senescence within the tumor microenvironment (TME) further exemplifies the intricate role of MSCs in pathological contexts [65]. MSCs in the TME adopt a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which promotes tumor progression, metastasis, and immune evasion [66]. Li et al. demonstrated that colorectal cancer-derived MSCs suppressed p53 expression in tumor cells via conditioned media, enhancing tumor cell proliferation and survival [67].

Emerging molecular regulators, such as miR-29c-3p and p300, provide additional avenues for therapeutic intervention [68]. Shang et al. showed that miR-29c-3p overexpression activated p53/p21 and p16 pathways, driving MSC senescence, while knockdown reversed these effects and enhanced proliferation [69]. Similarly, Li et al. identified p300 as a critical regulator of MSC ageing, with its reduced expression accelerating p53/p21 activation and senescence. These studies emphasize further exploring epigenetic and molecular regulators to develop precise therapeutic strategies for delaying MSC aging [70]. MSC senescence is propelled by the complex interplay between oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and signalling with other pathways, representing major challenges for MSC therapeutic application. This is supported by expert analysis of the need for a multimodal approach to balance p53/p21 signaling through the modulation of antioxidants, anti-inflammatory strategies, and molecular regulators, improving MSC functionality and scalability. These insights further provide a conceptual framework for moving the field of MSC therapy forward in advancing underserved and underutilized patient populations and overcoming age-related barriers in clinical settings (Fig. 1).

3.2. Regulation of MSC proliferation and differentiation

MSCs are ideal for tissue repair, regeneration, and immune modulation because they can self-renew and differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes [71]. These processes are orchestrated by an intricate balance between genetic, molecular, and environmental factors with key pathways [72]. Transcription factors, as well as non-coding RNAs, regulate MSC behaviour. Still, external stimuli like mechanical stress, oxygen levels, and biochemical cues influence their plasticity, proliferation, and differentiation potential [73]. Impaired regenerative capacity, pathological conditions including fibrosis and cancer, and dysregulation of these processes can result from this dysregulation [74]. However, the mechanisms underlying MSC proliferation and their differentiation must be understood before optimizing their therapeutic applications [75]. The p53-p21 signaling pathway mediates the modulation of MSC proliferation and differentiation [76]. However, too much activation is detrimental to MSC function, while its activation is critical to maintaining genomic stability and blocking oncogenic MSC transformation [77].

Additionally, Yan et al. showed that p53 signalling inhibition promotes the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Their study demonstrated that p53 inhibition suppressed apoptosis, increased proliferation, and increased expression of both cardiomyocyte-specific markers, cTnI and CX-43. These findings provide implications for targeting the p53p21 pathway in cardiovascular regenerative medicine, where promoting lineage-specific differentiation is critical [78,79]. Similarly, Zhang et al. discovered that p53/p21 regulates Bmi-1 in the vasculogenic differentiation of DPSCs. The authors determined that p53 and p21 suppress endothelial differentiation by restricting the expression of endothelial markers and by preventing capillary formation, while Bmi-1 promotes self-renewal. A reciprocal interaction between p53/p21 and Bmi-1 was observed to underscore the complex tuning required to maximize MSC functionality for vascular regeneration [80,81].

MSC proliferation is vital for maintaining their regenerative potential and scalability in therapeutic applications [82,83]. However, environmental stressors and senescence can impair this process by disrupting key signaling pathways [84,85]. Lin et al. investigated the impact of palmitic acid methyl ester (PAME) on human bone marrow MSCs (hBM-MSCs), finding that PAME induced G2/M phase arrest via stabilization of p53, increased p21 expression, and reduced cyclin B1 and Cdk1 levels. Although apoptosis and ROS levels remained unaffected, as shown in Fig. 2, the inhibition of MSC proliferation highlights the potential role of fatty acid metabolites in modulating MSC behaviour [86,87]. The p53-p21 pathway is also implicated in the anti-cancer effects of MSCs [88,89]. Byun et al. found that adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ASCs) inhibit HCC cell proliferation by activating the JAK/STAT1 pathway and increasing p53/p21 expression, with IFN-β as a key mediator. This suggests ASCs could be therapeutic agents in cancer treatment by exploiting the p53-p21 pathway's tumour-suppressive properties. However, the study highlights the minimal role of TRAIL in MSCs' anti-cancer activity, necessitating further investigation [90,91].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

PAME-Mediated p53 Activation and Cell Cycle Arrest in MSCs. This diagram illustrates the signalling pathways influenced by PAME and its effects on cell proliferation and survival. PAME activates PP2A, leading to a reduction in p-Akt levels, which inhibits Akt signalling. This suppression disrupts Mdm2 function, resulting in the stabilization and activation of p53. Elevated p53 levels increase p21 expression, leading to G2/M cell cycle arrest and downregulation of Cdk1/cyclin B1, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation. Additionally, PAME disrupts calcium (Ca2+), hydrogen ion (H+), and ROS homeostasis, further contributing to stress responses and cellular dysfunction.

Beyond their roles in proliferation and differentiation, the p53-p21 axis also regulates cellular reprogramming [92]. Brosh et al. explored the role of p53 in mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) during somatic cell reprogramming, demonstrating that p53 restricts MET by inhibiting Klf4-mediated epithelial gene activation. The study identified p21-mediated suppression of E-cadherin and other epithelial markers as key mechanisms [93]. The control of MSC proliferation and differentiation is exercised through a tight control that requires both genomic stability and enhancement of therapeutic functionality. While the p53-p21 pathway is indispensable in surveillance against oncogenic transformation, its overactivation is a major obstacle to MSC plasticity. This pathway is effectively modulated through specific combinations of compounds. It offers a way to target it simultaneously with knowledge of how it interacts with other critical regulators, such as Bmi-1 and the JAK/STAT1 pathway, to advance MSC-based therapies (Fig. 2).

3.3. Stress response and apoptosis

Stress response and apoptosis are closely related cellular processes critical to maintaining homeostasis under adverse conditions to the cell, relieving the burden of damage and preserving cell viability [94,95]. Pathways like p53, the MAPK, and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are part of the stress response that helps counteract oxidative stress, DNA damage, and metabolic imbalances [96,97]. Through apoptosis, unsustainable stress induces the death of irreparably damaged cells to prevent ensuing harmful outcomes, such as inflammation or tumorigenesis [98]. Regulators, such as proapoptotic proteins (e.g., Bax and Bak) and antiapoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL), mediate the delicate equilibrium between cell survival and apoptosis [99,100]. By dysregulating such processes, these processes become critically dysregulated and compromise MSC's viability and therapeutic potential [101,102]. This molecular switch mediates the coordination of MSC stress responses. The p53 p21 pathway operates as a p53 p21 pathway to execute cell cycle arrest or apoptosis [103]. Under oxidative stress, p53 and MAPK signaling pathways regulate senescence and apoptosis in interplay [104,105]. Deryabin et al. demonstrated that MAPK suppression in human endometrium-derived MSCs (hMESCs) increased p53 phosphorylation, p21 expression, and Rb hypophosphorylation, promoting senescence. Conversely, p53 inhibition activated ERK1/2 signaling, highlighting a reciprocal regulatory relationship, as shown in Fig. 3 [64,106]. The impact of chemotherapeutic agents on MSC apoptosis further highlights the vulnerability of MSCs under stress [107,108]. Yang et al. investigated the effects of doxorubicin, a DNA-damaging agent, on bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs). Doxorubicin increased ROS levels, depolarized mitochondrial membranes, and triggered apoptosis via activation of p38, JNK, and p53 pathways. Notably, inhibitors of p38 and JNK, but not ERK, mitigated apoptosis, suggesting specific therapeutic targets to preserve MSC viability during chemotherapeutic stress. Furthermore, doxorubicin reduced VEGF and IGF-1 secretion, impairing the regenerative potential of BMSCs [109,110].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) in Cancer and the Inhibitory Role of Celastrol. This diagram illustrates the role of senescent cells and their secretory phenotype (SASP) in cancer progression, alongside the inhibitory effects of Celastrol. Senescent cells release SASP factors such as IL-6, IL-8, and CXCL12, which promote cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal and enhance stemness. SASP factors also drive epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), converting epithelial cancer cells into migratory mesenchymal cells, thereby facilitating invasion and metastasis. Caveolin-1 (CAV1) is depicted as a key regulator within senescent cells, modulating SASP release. Celastrol inhibits CAV1, reducing SASP secretion and potentially mitigating CSC proliferation and EMT-driven migration and invasion.

The role of inflammation in MSC apoptosis and dysfunction has also been extensively studied [111,112]. Gu et al. examined bone marrow MSCs from non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and found that elevated p21 and NF-κB-p65 levels were associated with reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis. Knockdown of p21 or inhibition of NF-κB-p65 improved MSC functionality, suggesting that the NF-κB-p53/p21 axis is a critical mediator of MSC dysfunction in inflammatory conditions such as type 1 diabetes mellitus [113,114]. The role of metabolic stress in MSC apoptosis further highlights the multifaceted regulation of stress responses [115]. Lin et al. investigated the effects of PAME on hBM-MSCs, finding that PAME stabilized p53 and increased p21 expression, leading to G2/M cell cycle arrest without inducing apoptosis. This study reveals the nuanced role of metabolic factors in modulating MSC proliferation and highlights the p53-p21 pathway as a key mediator of cellular responses to metabolic stress [86,116]. Stress response and apoptosis are critical to keeping MSC functionality, but dysregulated stress response and apoptosis can be detrimental. p53 p21 pathway emerges as the key regulator balancing cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis. Strategies that transiently modulate this pathway under oxidative, inflammatory, or metabolic stress promise enhancing MSC survival and functionality. Understanding the combined stress response and downstream mechanisms will be crucial to implementing these MSC-based therapies to optimize regenerative medicine (Fig. 3; Table 1).

Table 1.

p53-p21 signalling's impact on MSC biology and therapy.

Key Factors Pathways Mechanisms Therapeutic Potential Intervention References
Oxidative stress, DNA damage, chronic inflammation Activation of p53-p21 and p16-pRB pathways DNA damage and ROS accumulation Delaying MSC senescence Antioxidant interventions [55]
Oxidative stress, DNA damage, chronic inflammation Activation of p53-p21 and p16-pRB pathways Reduction of ROS levels Enhancing MSC proliferation and differentiation Hydrogen-rich saline [56]
Chronic inflammation TLR4/MyD88-NF-κB-p53/p21 pathway Activation of inflammatory signalling Reducing inflammation-driven senescence LPS exposure in DPSCs [58]
Autoimmune and haematological disorders p53/p21 activation Increased expression of senescence markers Improving MSC proliferation and hematopoietic support BM-MSC dysfunction [60]
Autoimmune and haematological disorders p53/p21 activation Activation of senescence pathways Targeting haematological disorders MDS affects [61]
Hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK-p53/p21 crosstalk Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK pathways Dysregulation of β-catenin and MAPK signaling Restoring MSC functionality Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors [63]
Hyperactivation of Wnt/β-catenin, MAPK-p53/p21 crosstalk Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK pathways Reciprocal regulation with p53/p21 signaling Mitigating MSC senescence MAPK suppression studies [64]
Fatty acid metabolites p53 stabilization and p21 upregulation Stabilization of p53, increased p21 levels Preventing MSC proliferation arrest Role of PAME [86]
Anti-cancer effects JAK/STAT1-p53/p21 pathway Upregulation of tumor-suppressive signals Inducing tumour apoptosis Therapeutic role in HCC [90]
Oxidative stress p53, MAPK signaling pathways ROS-mediated activation of senescence Preventing stress-induced MSC dysfunction MAPK-related stress response [64]
Chemotherapeutic agents p38, JNK, and p53 pathways Activation of apoptotic pathways Protecting MSCs from chemotherapy-induced damage Doxorubicin impact [109]
Inflammation NF-κB-p53/p21 axis Upregulation of NF-κB and p53/p21 signalling Reducing apoptosis and inflammation NOD MSC dysfunction [113]
Metabolic stress p53 stabilization and p21 upregulation Dysregulated cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase Maintaining MSC functionality PAME-induced stress [86]
Senescence in the tumor microenvironment p53-p21 signaling suppression MSCs adopt SASP phenotype Reducing tumor progression, metastasis Tumor-supporting MSCs [67]
Epigenetic regulation miR-29c-3p and p300 Upregulation of p53/p21 pathways Reversing MSC senescence miR-29c-3p modulation [69]
Epigenetic regulation p300 downregulation Reduced MSC proliferation and differentiation Enhancing genomic stability p300 as a therapeutic target [70]
Cardiomyogenic differentiation p53/p21 suppression Enhanced differentiation into cardiomyocytes Cardiovascular regenerative medicine BM-MSC differentiation [78]
Vascular regeneration p53/p21 and Bmi-1 Suppression of endothelial markers Improving vasculogenic differentiation DPSCs in vascular regeneration [80]
Cellular reprogramming p53-p21 regulation during MET Suppression of epithelial gene activation Enhancing cellular plasticity Reprogramming efficiency [92]

4. Strategies to modulate p53-p21 signaling in MSCs

4.1. Gene editing technologies (CRISPR-Cas9) to regulate p53 or p21 expression

CRISPR-Cas9 and other gene editing technologies have now greatly advanced the capacity to precisely control the expression of fundamental regulatory genes, including TP53, encoding p53, and CDKN1A, coding for p21 [117,118]. Consequently, these genes are pivotal targets of therapeutic intervention in controlling cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence [119]. In MSCs, suppressing p53 or p21 expression using CRISPR-Cas9 delays senescence, enhances proliferation and improves regenerative potential [120]. On the other hand, this gene overexpression has therapeutic importance in suppressing tumours [121,122]. Reversible regulation that does not require permanent genetic alteration is made possible by advanced iterations of CRISPR, such as CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) and interference (CRISPRi) [123,124]. However, CRISPR technologies involve carefully considering off-target effects, genomic stability, and cellular stress responses to avoid off-target effects and promote the safety and efficacy of the applications [125,126]. One of the challenges in applying CRISPR-Cas9 is the potential activation of the p53-mediated DNA damage response [127]. Haapaniemi et al. observed that CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-dependent cell cycle arrest in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. This response decreases editing efficiency in cells with functional p53 pathways but can be mitigated by inhibiting p53, thereby enhancing homologous recombination [127,128]. Sun et al. developed a dynamic p21-mNeonGreen reporter system to evaluate TP53-p21 pathway activation during CRISPR-Cas9 editing. Their findings revealed that specific delivery methods, such as double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides and adeno-associated viral vectors, induced higher p21 activation than single-stranded counterparts. Lentiviral vectors demonstrated lower activation, making them more suitable for editing sensitive cells like hematopoietic stem cells [129,130]. The potential for CRISPR-Cas9 to cause off-target effects and genomic instability is especially pronounced in stem cells [131]. Ihry et al. reported that Cas9-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) triggered a p53-dependent toxic response in human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), leading to cell death and significantly reducing editing efficiency in wild-type p53 cells [132,133].

Large-scale analyses have further elucidated the role of p53 in CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing [134]. McKinley et al. performed a comprehensive study of CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cell lines targeting cell-cycle genes, uncovering diverse phenotypes associated with p53-dependent responses to cell-cycle defects. Their findings demonstrated that p53 modulates cell cycle progression through distinct mechanisms depending on the specific defect, reinforcing its critical role in maintaining cellular integrity [135,136]. The expression of Cas9 itself can also impact p53 signalling, as highlighted by Enache et al. in human cancer cell lines. They demonstrated that Cas9 activity induced p53 pathway activation in TP53 wild-type cells at both mRNA and protein levels while increasing DNA repair activity. Cas9 expression favoured the selection of p53-inactivating mutations, which could reduce editing efficiency in wild-type cells [137,138]. Although CRISPR-Cas9 offers unprecedented precision in gene editing, its application for regulating p53 and p21 expression must dance between therapeutic objectives and safety concerns. Modulating the p53p21 pathway with CRISPR may delay senescence and improve regenerative capacity for MSC-based therapies. Still, this full potential must be carefully evaluated for the effects on off-target effects, cell toxicity and long-term genomic stability. Refining CRISPR delivery methods, including advanced tools such as CRISPRa and CRISPRi, along with context-specific approaches to minimize their risks and maximize the therapeutic potential of MSCs, need to be researched in the future.

4.2. RNA interference (RNAi) or antisense oligonucleotides

RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) offer the ability to alter precisely p53 or p21 expression, which allows for determining the potential to regulate cellular functions, including proliferation, apoptosis, and senescence, as therapeutic tools [139]. RNAi is a method of reducing the synthesis of a target protein by using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to degrade the corresponding target mRNA [140]. We used this strategy to inhibit the overactivation of p53 or p21, delaying senescence and rejuvenating MSC regenerative capacity [141,142]. However, unlike 'organic', ASOs are synthetic single-stranded nucleic acids that bind complementary mRNA sequences, either blocking translation or RNA degradation [143]. They are based on these mechanisms, and thus, ASOs can effectively suppress p53 or p21 expression, opening up therapeutic avenues for degenerative diseases and cancer [144,145]. However, delivery efficiency, off-target effects, and cellular stress responses have significant barriers yet to the first safe and effective clinical applications of delivery [146]. Recent demonstrations of the potential of RNAi-mediated regulation in p53 and p21 in cancer and senescence therapeutics [147]. RNAi targeting the HPV16 E7 oncogene in cervical cancer cells was investigated by Sima et al. They found that siRNA silencing of HPV16-E7 induced p53 and p21 levels and hypophosphorylation of Rb and resulted in apoptotic HPV-positive cells without affecting cells lacking HPV [148,149].

Beyond cancer, RNAi has been used to elucidate regulators of p53 in cellular homeostasis. Moudry et al. conducted a genome-wide RNAi screen to identify p53 regulators, revealing that WDR75 is critical in ribosome biogenesis. Depletion of WDR75 activated the RPL5/RPL11-dependent p53 stabilization pathway, resulting in p53 accumulation, impaired proliferation, and cellular senescence [150]. ASOs targeting p53 or p21 also provide compelling strategies for therapeutic intervention [151,152]. Wang et al. evaluated an antisense anti-MDM2 oligonucleotide in colon cancer models, demonstrating reduced tumour growth in both wild-type and mutant p53 cell lines. MDM2 inhibition synergized with chemotherapy agents like 5-fluorouracil, enhancing antitumor effects [153]. Further expanding the potential of ASOs, Zhang et al. investigated mixed-backbone oligonucleotides (MBOs) targeting MDM2. MBOs inhibited MDM2 expression dose-dependently, effectively reducing tumor growth in vitro and in vivo.

Additionally, MBOs enhanced the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiation therapy via both p53-dependent and p53-independent mechanisms. These findings underscore the utility of ASOs not only as direct therapeutic agents but also as chemosensitizers and radiosensitizers, broadening their scope of application in cancer treatment [154]. The versatility of ASOs extends beyond cancer, as demonstrated by Swiatkowska et al., who investigated the role of structural elements in the 5′-terminal region of p53 mRNA in regulating translation under stress. Using antisense oligomers, they identified critical hairpin motifs involved in internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-mediated translation of p53 and Δ40p53 isoforms, particularly under stress conditions. Their study highlights the potential of ASOs to modulate stress-induced translation of p53, providing insights into RNA-based regulation in cellular stress responses [155]. RNAi and ASOs are effective gene silencing tools for manipulating p53 and p21 but face delivery efficiency and stability challenges. Future technologies, like lipid nanoparticles and cell-specific targeting systems, may overcome these limitations and advance their use in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy. p53 and p21 are attractive therapeutic targets in cancer, degenerative diseases, and ageing-related conditions, which can be modifiable through RNAi and ASOs. Addressing delivery and specificity challenges could enable the advancement of MSC-based therapies and other targeted treatments despite the challenges in delivery and specificity.

4.3. Pharmacological modulation

The p53 and p21 expression can be pharmacologically modulated to optimize MSC functionality and therapeutic potential [156]. The p53–p21 axis has been modulated with small molecule inhibitors, antioxidants, and novel compounds to delay senescence and enhance stress resistance [157]. Transient suppression of p53 with compounds such as PFT-α promotes MSC proliferation and survival, while p53 activation by Nutlin-3 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells to show therapeutic benefits [158]. In addition, resveratrol and epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) help imbue indirect modulation by lowering levels of oxidative stress and priming the cell for resilience. These approaches show the potential of pharmacological intervention. Still, with precise dosage, timing, and context-dependent application, one must be aware of them to avoid cancers or loss of stemness [159]. As a case of pharmacological modulation, for instance, cholesterol is utilized to reduce MSC senescence [160]. Zhang et al. showed that cholesterol attenuated senescence-associated β galactosidase activity and p53 and p21 expression by affecting autophagy and ROS p53-p21 pathway. Oxidative stress was also alleviated, cell proliferation was improved, and G1 cell cycle arrest was reduced in MSC through cholesterol treatment, improving MSC functionality [161]. Another promising compound is Celastrol, which has shown anti-senescence and anti-cancer properties [162]. Zhang et al. reported that Celastrol reduced p53, p21, and SASP factors in renal cancer cells, alleviating cellular senescence and suppressing tumour-promoting behaviours. By downregulating CAV1, a key senescence mediator, Celastrol inhibited invasion and stemness in cancer cells [163].

The role of antioxidants in pharmacological modulation is exemplified by epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a compound derived from green tea [164]. Shin et al. demonstrated that EGCG protects hMSCs from oxidative stress-induced senescence by activating the antioxidant regulator Nrf2. EGCG treatment reduced ROS levels and mitigated acetyl-p53 and p21 expression in hydrogen peroxide-exposed cells. However, in Nrf2-knockdown cells, EGCG failed to exert its protective effects, indicating that its senescence-preventing properties are mediated by Nrf2 activation [165]. In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) like Suberoyl anilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and MS-275 have been shown to impair MSC stemness [166]. Di Bernardo et al. found that SAHA preferentially activated apoptotic pathways, while MS-275 promoted senescence, disrupting MSC functionality by downregulating stem cell-regulatory genes. Interestingly, these effects were not mediated by the p53-p21 pathway but instead involved cyclin kinase inhibitors [167]. Pharmacological modulation of the p53-p21 pathway offers promising strategies to counteract apoptosis and enhance MSC proliferation [168]. Yan et al. demonstrated that PFT-α, a p53 inhibitor, effectively reduced p53 and p21 expression in 5-azacytidine (5-AZA)-treated BMSCs, promoting proliferation and reducing apoptosis. These findings suggest that transient inhibition of the p53-p21 pathway could protect MSCs from stress-induced damage while maintaining their regenerative potential [78]. Combinatorial therapies, which integrate pathways like Wnt/β-catenin, can enhance regenerative outcomes by manipulating the p53-p21 pathway. Combining antioxidants with p53/p21 targeting agents can enhance MSC stress resistance, mitigating genomic instability risk. However, careful dosing and timing are needed to minimize tumorigenesis effects or loss of differentiation capacity. Pharmacological intervention of the p53 p21 pathway offers versatile strategies for increasing MSC regenerative capacity and treating pathological conditions like cancer and senescence. Future research should optimize these compounds for clinical applications and explore advanced delivery systems and context-specific combinations to maximize efficacy with minimal risk.

5. Challenges and risks in modulating p53-p21 signaling

There is great potential for therapeutic modulation of the p53-p21 signaling pathway, but this modulating approach has inherent challenges and risks [169]. Another great concern is genomic instability and tumorigenesis [170]. However, studying how this pathway usually works could inadvertently promote unchecked cell proliferation. If mediated by p53, it might be tumour-suppressive or eliminate tumour growth, potentially increasing the probability of malignant transformation, particularly in genetically predisposed or high-risk patients [171]. The other challenge is balancing the safety of approaches with their therapeutic benefits [172]. Pathway modulation may be used to modulate regenerative capacity or to attenuate senescence, but inappropriate or excessive inhibition may disrupt normal cell cycle regulation and thus result in adverse effects [173]. Control of pathway activity is necessary to avoid unintended consequences [174]. Regulatory and ethical considerations are also critical in clinical translation [175]. Once these therapies receive rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation, targeting p53-p21 therapies must be effective and safe [176]. These underscore the need for careful and well-designed approaches to exploit this pathway for therapeutic use.

6. Conclusion and future perspectives

The p53-p21 Signaling pathway is reviewed concerning its major roles in regulating MSC biology, including the issues of senescence, limited proliferation, and stress-induced apoptosis. The seemingly opposite roles of this pathway as a guardian of genomic stability and barrier to regenerative potential reinforce the necessity of fine-tuning its function to exploit MSC functionality fully. Recent progress in small molecule inhibitors such as PFTα enhances MSC proliferation and delay senescence, and antioxidants, including hydrogen-rich saline and ECGG, mitigate the effects of oxidative stress to maintain the viability of MSC. TP53 and CDKN1A expression can be precisely modulated by genetic tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 and RNA interference, and synergistic improvements in MSC resilience and regenerative outcome can be achieved by combining these with complementary pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin and MAPKs.

Importantly, these strategies show great promise, but challenges remain. Current studies tend to ameliorate senescence and enhance proliferation at the expense of less attention to the intricate interplay of pathways controlling MSC function in physiologic or pathological circumstances. One example is that pharmacological agents that target p53-p21 appear efficacious, but off-target effects, genomic stability, and long-term safety remain a concern. In addition, the MSC entry to variability across donor sources, culture conditions, and therapeutic applications complicates the development of standardized protocols. Future research will concentrate on targeted delivery systems to avoid off-target effects and enhance the specificity of p53-p21 modulation. Further therapeutic outcomes could be refined by combining genetic tools with targeted therapeutic agents, remaining safe and efficacious. In addition, understanding p53-p21 interactions with other signalling networks will be critical to creating multi-targeted approaches to solve complex problems in MSC-based therapies. However, as the field advances, it should be possible to harness these insights into translational applications through which the true therapeutic potential of MSCs in regenerative medicine, cancer, and age-related disorders can be realized.

Author contributions

AG, MA, NHK, KG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software. SKS, GG and BKK: Writing – Original Draft Preparation. HA and MR: Data curation, Writing – Review & Editing. LSW: Data Curation and Methodology. VK: Methodology, Software. VS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Funding

None.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine.

References

  • 1.Hu L., Yin C., Zhao F., Ali A., Ma J., Qian A. Mesenchymal stem cells: cell fate decision to osteoblast or adipocyte and application in osteoporosis treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2) doi: 10.3390/ijms19020360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Song N., Scholtemeijer M., Shah K. Mesenchymal stem cell immunomodulation: mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020;41(9):653–664. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foti R., Storti G., Palmesano M., Scioli M.G., Fiorelli E., Terriaca S., et al. Senescence in adipose-derived stem cells: biological mechanisms and therapeutic challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(15) doi: 10.3390/ijms25158390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu J., Ding Y., Liu Z., Liang X. Senescence in mesenchymal stem cells: functional alterations, molecular mechanisms, and rejuvenation strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:258. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee B.C., Yu K.R. Impact of mesenchymal stem cell senescence on inflammaging. BMB Rep. 2020;53(2):65–73. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2020.53.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vono R., Jover Garcia E., Spinetti G., Madeddu P. Oxidative stress in mesenchymal stem cell senescence: regulation by coding and noncoding RNAs. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(9):864–879. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mastrolia I., Foppiani E.M., Murgia A., Candini O., Samarelli A.V., Grisendi G., et al. Challenges in clinical development of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: concise review. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(11):1135–1148. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou X., Hong Y., Zhang H., Li X. Mesenchymal stem cell senescence and rejuvenation: current status and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:364. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reed S.M., Quelle D.E. p53 acetylation: regulation and consequences. Cancers. 2014;7(1):30–69. doi: 10.3390/cancers7010030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gudkov A.V., Gurova K.V., Komarova E.A. Inflammation and p53: a tale of two stresses. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(4):503–516. doi: 10.1177/1947601911409747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Y., Gao T., Wang B. Application of mesenchymal stem cells for anti-senescence and clinical challenges. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03497-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Engeland K. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(5):946–960. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00988-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Feroz W., Sheikh A.M.A. Exploring the multiple roles of guardian of the genome: P53. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2020;21(1):49. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campisi J. Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors. Cell. 2005;120(4):513–522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Solozobova V., Blattner C. p53 in stem cells. World J Biol Chem. 2011;2(9):202–214. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v2.i9.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen J. The cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic functions of p53 in tumor initiation and progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6(3):a026104. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang R., Chen H., Liang J., Li Y., Yang J., Luo C., et al. Dual role of reactive oxygen species and their application in cancer therapy. J Cancer. 2021;12(18):5543–5561. doi: 10.7150/jca.54699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Athar M., Elmets C.A., Kopelovich L. Pharmacological activation of p53 in cancer cells. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(6):631–639. doi: 10.2174/138161211795222595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chehelgerdi M., Chehelgerdi M., Khorramian-Ghahfarokhi M., Shafieizadeh M., Mahmoudi E., Eskandari F., et al. Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy. Molecular Cancer. 2024;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01925-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chery J. RNA therapeutics: RNAi and antisense mechanisms and clinical applications. Postdoc J. 2016;4(7):35–50. doi: 10.14304/surya.jpr.v4n7.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mijit M., Caracciolo V., Melillo A., Amicarelli F., Giordano A. Role of p53 in the regulation of cellular senescence. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3) doi: 10.3390/biom10030420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neri S., Borzì R.M. Molecular mechanisms contributing to mesenchymal stromal cell aging. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2) doi: 10.3390/biom10020340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stegh A.H. Targeting the p53 signaling pathway in cancer therapy - the promises, challenges and perils. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16(1):67–83. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.643299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodriguez R., Rubio R., Masip M., Catalina P., Nieto A., de la Cueva T., et al. Loss of p53 induces tumorigenesis in p21-deficient mesenchymal stem cells. Neoplasia. 2009;11(4):397–407. doi: 10.1593/neo.81620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu D., Xu Y. p53, oxidative stress, and aging. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2011;15(6):1669–1678. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Childs B.G., Durik M., Baker D.J., van Deursen J.M. Cellular senescence in aging and age-related disease: from mechanisms to therapy. Nat Med. 2015;21(12):1424–1435. doi: 10.1038/nm.4000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dong Z., Luo Y., Yuan Z., Tian Y., Jin T., Xu F. Cellular senescence and SASP in tumor progression and therapeutic opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02096-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pflaum J., Schlosser S., Müller M. p53 family and cellular stress responses in cancer. Front Oncol. 2014;4:285. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shreeya T., Ansari M.S., Kumar P., Saifi M., Shati A.A., Alfaifi M.Y., et al. Senescence: a DNA damage response and its role in aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front Aging. 2023;4:1292053. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1292053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lacroix M., Riscal R., Arena G., Linares L.K., Le Cam L. Metabolic functions of the tumor suppressor p53: implications in normal physiology, metabolic disorders, and cancer. Mol Metabol. 2020;33:2–22. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marei H.E., Althani A., Afifi N., Hasan A., Caceci T., Pozzoli G., et al. p53 signaling in cancer progression and therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02396-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Satyanarayana A., Hilton M.B., Kaldis P. p21 Inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(1):65–77. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-06-0525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nag S., Qin J., Srivenugopal K.S., Wang M., Zhang R. The MDM2-p53 pathway revisited. J Biomed Res. 2013;27(4):254–271. doi: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Labuschagne C.F., Zani F., Vousden K.H. Control of metabolism by p53 – cancer and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2018;1870(1):32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Engeland K. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(5):946–960. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00988-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reinhardt H.C., Aslanian A.S., Lees J.A., Yaffe M.B. p53-deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell. 2007;11(2):175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee D.H., Kim C., Zhang L., Lee Y.J. Role of p53, PUMA, and Bax in wogonin-induced apoptosis in human cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75(10):2020–2033. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Janus F., Albrechtsen N., Dornreiter I., Wiesmüller L., Grosse F., Deppert W. The dual role model for p53 in maintaining genomic integrity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55(1):12–27. doi: 10.1007/s000180050266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kumari R., Jat P. Mechanisms of cellular senescence: cell cycle arrest and senescence associated secretory phenotype. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.645593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu Y., Chen Q. Senescent mesenchymal stem cells: disease mechanism and treatment strategy. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2020;6(4):173–182. doi: 10.1007/s40610-020-00141-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fulda S., Gorman A.M., Hori O., Samali A. Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death. Int J Cell Biol. 2010. 2010:214074. doi: 10.1155/2010/214074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bunz F., Dutriaux A., Lengauer C., Waldman T., Zhou S., Brown J.P., et al. Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science. 1998;282(5393):1497–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li C., Wu J., Dong Q., Ma J., Gao H., Liu G., et al. The crosstalk between oxidative stress and DNA damage induces neural stem cell senescence by HO-1/PARP1 non-canonical pathway. Free Radic Biol Med. 2024;223:443–457. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee H.J., Chae C.W., Han H.J. Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in diabetes: amelioration of mitochondrial dysfunction-induced senescence. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;168 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tan L., Liu X., Dou H., Hou Y. Characteristics and regulation of mesenchymal stem cell plasticity by the microenvironment — specific factors involved in the regulation of MSC plasticity. Genes Diseases. 2022;9(2):296–309. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gudkov A.V., Komarova E.A. Pathologies associated with the p53 response. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2010;2(7):a001180. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vasanthan J., Gurusamy N., Rajasingh S., Sigamani V., Kirankumar S., Thomas E.L., et al. Role of human mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative therapy. Cells. 2020;10(1) doi: 10.3390/cells10010054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saito Y., Yamamoto S., Chikenji T.S. Role of cellular senescence in inflammation and regeneration. Inflamm Regen. 2024;44(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41232-024-00342-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tavana O., Puebla-Osorio N., Sang M., Zhu C. Absence of p53-dependent apoptosis combined with nonhomologous end-joining deficiency leads to a severe diabetic phenotype in mice. Diabetes. 2010;59(1):135–142. doi: 10.2337/db09-0792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rayess H., Wang M.B., Srivatsan E.S. Cellular senescence and tumor suppressor gene p16. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(8):1715–1725. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fan X.L., Zhang Y., Li X., Fu Q.L. Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(14):2771–2794. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03454-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhou T., Yuan Z., Weng J., Pei D., Du X., He C., et al. Challenges and advances in clinical applications of mesenchymal stromal cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01037-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shi T., van Soest D.M.K., Polderman P.E., Burgering B.M.T., Dansen T.B. DNA damage and oxidant stress activate p53 through differential upstream signaling pathways. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;172:298–311. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.De Blander H., Morel A.P., Senaratne A.P., Ouzounova M., Puisieux A. Cellular plasticity: a route to senescence exit and tumorigenesis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(18) doi: 10.3390/cancers13184561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xiang Q.Y., Tian F., Du X., Xu J., Zhu L.Y., Guo L.L., et al. Postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins-induced premature senescence of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells via the SIRT1/p53/Ac-p53/p21 axis through oxidative mechanism. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(24):26080–26094. doi: 10.18632/aging.202298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang W., Huang C., Sun A., Qiao L., Zhang X., Huang J., et al. Hydrogen alleviates cellular senescence via regulation of ROS/p53/p21 pathway in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:1126–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hammad M., Raftari M., Cesário R., Salma R., Godoy P., Emami S.N., et al. Roles of oxidative stress and Nrf2 signaling in pathogenic and non-pathogenic cells: a possible general mechanism of resistance to therapy. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;12(7) doi: 10.3390/antiox12071371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Feng G., Zheng K., Cao T., Zhang J., Lian M., Huang D., et al. Repeated stimulation by LPS promotes the senescence of DPSCs via TLR4/MyD88-NF-κB-p53/p21 signaling. Cytotechnology. 2018;70(3):1023–1035. doi: 10.1007/s10616-017-0180-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zaripova L.N., Midgley A., Christmas S.E., Beresford M.W., Pain C., Baildam E.M., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the pathogenesis and therapy of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(22) doi: 10.3390/ijms242216040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gu Z., Jiang J., Tan W., Xia Y., Cao H., Meng Y., et al. p53/p21 Pathway involved in mediating cellular senescence of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:134243. doi: 10.1155/2013/134243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fei C., Zhao Y., Guo J., Gu S., Li X., Chang C. Senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells is accompanied by activation of p53/p21 pathway in myelodysplastic syndromes. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93(6):476–486. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Babu M.A., R Jyothi S., Kaur I., Kumar S., Sharma N., Kumar M.R., et al. The role of GATA4 in mesenchymal stem cell senescence: a new frontier in regenerative medicine. Regenerative Therapy. 2025;28:214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2024.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gu Z., Tan W., Feng G., Meng Y., Shen B., Liu H., et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates the senescence of bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients through the p53/p21 pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;387(1–2):27–37. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1866-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Deryabin P.I., Borodkina A.V., Nikolsky N.N., Burova E.B. [RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN p53/p21/Rb AND MAPK SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN HUMAN ENDOMETRIUM-DERIVED STEM CELLS UNDER OXIDATIVE STRESS]. Tsitologiia. 2015;57(11):788–795. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Papait A., Stefani F.R., Cargnoni A., Magatti M., Parolini O., Silini A.R. The multifaceted roles of MSCs in the tumor microenvironment: interactions with immune cells and exploitation for therapy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:447. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Du M., Sun L., Guo J., Lv H. Macrophages and tumor-associated macrophages in the senescent microenvironment: From immunosuppressive TME to targeted tumor therapy. Pharmacological Research. 2024;204:107198. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Li G., Zhang R., Zhang X., Shao S., Hu F., Feng Y. Human colorectal cancer derived-MSCs promote tumor cells escape from senescence via P53/P21 pathway. Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22(4):503–511. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02152-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lv T., Jiang L., Kong L., Yang J. MicroRNA‑29c‑3p acts as a tumor suppressor gene and inhibits tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting TRIM31. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(3):953–964. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shang J., Yao Y., Fan X., Shangguan L., Li J., Liu H., et al. miR-29c-3p promotes senescence of human mesenchymal stem cells by targeting CNOT6 through p53-p21 and p16-pRB pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1863(4):520–532. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Li Y., Zhong H., Wu M., Tan B., Zhao L., Yi Q., et al. Decline of p300 contributes to cell senescence and growth inhibition of hUC-MSCs through p53/p21 signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;515(1):24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li J., Wu Z., Zhao L., Liu Y., Su Y., Gong X., et al. The heterogeneity of mesenchymal stem cells: an important issue to be addressed in cell therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03587-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Napier J.D., Heckman R.W., Juenger T.E. Gene-by-environment interactions in plants: molecular mechanisms, environmental drivers, and adaptive plasticity. Plant Cell. 2023;35(1):109–124. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhou H., He Y., Xiong W., Jing S., Duan X., Huang Z., et al. MSC based gene delivery methods and strategies improve the therapeutic efficacy of neurological diseases. Bioact Mater. 2023;23:409–437. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rajesh R., Atallah R., Bärnthaler T. Dysregulation of metabolic pathways in pulmonary fibrosis. Pharmacology Therapeutics. 2023;246 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bagno L.L., Salerno A.G., Balkan W., Hare J.M. Mechanism of Action of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs): impact of delivery method. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022;22(4):449–463. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2016695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Velletri T., Xie N., Wang Y., Huang Y., Yang Q., Chen X., et al. P53 functional abnormality in mesenchymal stem cells promotes osteosarcoma development. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(1):e2015. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Neri S. Genetic stability of mesenchymal stromal cells for regenerative medicine applications: a fundamental biosafety aspect. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10) doi: 10.3390/ijms20102406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yan X., Lv A., Xing Y., Liu B., Hou J., Huang W., et al. Inhibition of p53-p21 pathway promotes the differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;354(1–2):21–28. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0801-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang F., Zhang Y., Jin D., Jiang Z., Liu Y., Knoll A., et al. Magnetic soft microrobot design for cell grasping and transportation. Cyborg Bionic Systems. 2024;5 doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhang Z., Oh M., Sasaki J.I., Nör J.E. Inverse and reciprocal regulation of p53/p21 and Bmi-1 modulates vasculogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(7):644. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03925-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li Z., Fan J., Xiao Y., Wang W., Zhen C., Pan J., et al. Essential role of Dhx16-mediated ribosome assembly in maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 2024;38(12):2699–2708. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02423-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Miclau K., Hambright W.S., Huard J., Stoddart M.J., Bahney C.S. Cellular expansion of MSCs: shifting the regenerative potential. Aging Cell. 2023;22(1):e13759. doi: 10.1111/acel.13759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhou C., Kuang M., Tao Y., Wang J., Luo Y., Fu Y., et al. Nynrin preserves hematopoietic stem cell function by inhibiting the mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31(9):1359–1375.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.de Magalhães J.P., Passos J.F. Stress, cell senescence and organismal ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 2018;170:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Li L., Li J., Zhong M., Wu Z., Wan S., Li X., et al. Nanozyme-enhanced tyramine signal amplification probe for preamplification-free myocarditis-related miRNAs detection. Chem Eng J. 2025;503:158093. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Lin J.H., Ting P.C., Lee W.S., Chiu H.W., Chien C.A., Liu C.H., et al. Palmitic acid methyl ester induces G(2)/M arrest in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via the p53/p21 pathway. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:7606238. doi: 10.1155/2019/7606238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Huang L., Li Y., Tang R., Yang P., Zhuo Y., Jiang X., et al. Bile acids metabolism in the gut-liver axis mediates liver injury during lactation. Life Sci. 2024;338:122380. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rodriguez R., Rubio R., Masip M., Catalina P., Nieto A., de la Cueva T., et al. Loss of p53 induces tumorigenesis in p21-deficient mesenchymal stem cells. Neoplasia. 2009;11(4):397. doi: 10.1593/neo.81620. IN9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yang H., Zhou H., Fu M., Xu H., Huang H., Zhong M., et al. TMEM64 aggravates the malignant phenotype of glioma by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;260:129332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Byun C.S., Hwang S., Woo S.H., Kim M.Y., Lee J.S., Lee J.I., et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells suppress growth of Huh7 hepatocellular carcinoma cells via interferon (IFN)-β-Mediated JAK/STAT1 pathway in vitro. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(5):609–619. doi: 10.7150/ijms.41354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhang C., Ge H., Zhang S., Liu D., Jiang Z., Lan C., et al. Hematoma evacuation via image-guided para-corticospinal tract approach in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol Ther. 2021;10(2):1001–1013. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00279-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brosh R., Assia-Alroy Y., Molchadsky A., Bornstein C., Dekel E., Madar S., et al. p53 counteracts reprogramming by inhibiting mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(2):312–320. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Brosh R., Assia-Alroy Y., Molchadsky A., Bornstein C., Dekel E., Madar S., et al. p53 Counteracts reprogramming by inhibiting mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(2):312–320. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fulda S., Gorman A.M., Hori O., Samali A. Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death. Int J Cell Biol. 2010;2010(1):214074. doi: 10.1155/2010/214074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gu X., Ren H. A survey of transoral robotic mechanisms: distal dexterity, variable stiffness, and triangulation. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023;4:7. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Fusée L.T.S., Marín M., Fåhraeus R., López I. Alternative mechanisms of p53 action during the unfolded protein response. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(2) doi: 10.3390/cancers12020401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Shen Y., Cheng L., Xu M., Wang W., Wan Z., Xiong H., et al. SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin downregulates miRNA-34a-5p and targets GREM2 to inactivate hepatic stellate cells and ameliorate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated fibrosis. Metabolism. 2023;146:155657. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shamas-Din A., Kale J., Leber B., Andrews D.W. Mechanisms of action of Bcl-2 family proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(4):a008714. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li S., Ling S., Wang D., Wang X., Hao F., Yin L., et al. Modified lentiviral globin gene therapy for pediatric β0/β0 transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia: a single-center, single-arm pilot trial. Cell Stem Cell. 2024;31(7):961–973.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhidu S., Ying T., Rui J., Chao Z. Translational potential of mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative therapies for human diseases: challenges and opportunities. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024;15(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13287-024-03885-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhu Q., Sun J., An C., Li X., Xu S., He Y., et al. Mechanism of LncRNA Gm2044 in germ cell development. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1410914. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1410914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pitolli C., Wang Y., Candi E., Shi Y., Melino G., Amelio I. p53-Mediated tumor suppression: DNA-damage response and alternative mechanisms. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11(12) doi: 10.3390/cancers11121983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yue J., López J.M. Understanding MAPK signaling pathways in apoptosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7) doi: 10.3390/ijms21072346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Du F., Ye Z., He A., Yuan J., Su M., Jia Q., et al. An engineered α1β1 integrin-mediated FcγRI signaling component to control enhanced CAR macrophage activation and phagocytosis. J Control Release. 2025;377:689–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhuo Y., Li W.S., Lu W., Li X., Ge L.T., Huang Y., et al. TGF-β1 mediates hypoxia-preconditioned olfactory mucosa mesenchymal stem cells improved neural functional recovery in Parkinson’s disease models and patients. Mil Med Res. 2024;11(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00550-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ramuta T., Kreft M.E. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells may decrease success of cancer treatment by inducing resistance to chemotherapy in cancer cells. Cancers. 2022;14(15) doi: 10.3390/cancers14153761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lyu Z., Xin M., Oyston D.R., Xue T., Kang H., Wang X., et al. Cause and consequence of heterogeneity in human mesenchymal stem cells: challenges in clinical application. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;260:155354. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yang F., Chen H., Liu Y., Yin K., Wang Y., Li X., et al. Doxorubicin caused apoptosis of mesenchymal stem cells via p38, JNK and p53 pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;32(4):1072–1082. doi: 10.1159/000354507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Xu A., Deng F., Chen Y., Kong Y., Pan L., Liao Q., et al. NF-κB pathway activation during endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in a rat model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;130:110525. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Giacomini C., Granéli C., Hicks R., Dazzi F. The critical role of apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cell therapeutics and implications in homeostasis and normal tissue repair. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20(6):570–582. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01018-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhang Y.W., Zheng X.W., Liu Y.J., Fang L., Pan Z.F., Bao M.H., et al. Effect of oridonin on cytochrome P450 expression and activities in HepaRG cell. Pharmacology. 2018;101(5–6):246–254. doi: 10.1159/000486600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gu Z., Jiang J., Xia Y., Yue X., Yan M., Tao T., et al. p21 is associated with the proliferation and apoptosis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from non-obese diabetic mice. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2013;121(10):607–613. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1354380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yi-Wen Z., Mei-Hua B., Xiao-Ya L., Yu C., Jing Y., Hong-Hao Z. Effects of oridonin on hepatic cytochrome P450 expression and activities in PXR-humanized mice. Biol Pharm Bull. 2018;41(5):707–712. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.White E. Role of the metabolic stress responses of apoptosis and autophagy in tumor suppression. Ernst Schering Found Symp Proc. 2007;(4):23–34. doi: 10.1007/2789_2008_087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yang H., He C., Bi Y., Zhu X., Deng D., Ran T., et al. Synergistic effect of VEGF and SDF-1α in endothelial progenitor cells and vascular smooth muscle cells. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:914347. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.914347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chehelgerdi M., Chehelgerdi M., Khorramian-Ghahfarokhi M., Shafieizadeh M., Mahmoudi E., Eskandari F., et al. Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01925-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zeng X., Yuan X., Liao H., Wei Y., Wu Q., Zhu X., et al. The miR-665/SOST Axis regulates the phenotypes of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporotic symptoms in female mice. Am J Pathol. 2024;194(11):2059–2075. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wang R., Wang Y., Zhu L., Liu Y., Li W. Epigenetic regulation in mesenchymal stem cell aging and differentiation and osteoporosis. Stem Cells Int. 2020;2020:8836258. doi: 10.1155/2020/8836258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Prelich G. Gene overexpression: uses, mechanisms, and interpretation. Genetics. 2012;190(3):841–854. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.136911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhao Q., Feng J., Liu F., Liang Q., Xie M., Dong J., et al. Rhizoma Drynariae-derived nanovesicles reverse osteoporosis by potentiating osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via targeting ERα signaling. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2024;14(5):2210–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Bendixen L., Jensen T.I., Bak R.O. CRISPR-Cas-mediated transcriptional modulation: the therapeutic promises of CRISPRa and CRISPRi. Mol Ther. 2023;31(7):1920–1937. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Bhat A.A., Afzal M., Moglad E., Thapa R., Ali H., Almalki W.H., et al. lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2024;24(1):226. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Merlin J.P.J., Abrahamse H. Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 precision: mitigating off-target effects for safe integration with photodynamic and stem cell therapies in cancer treatment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;180 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Bhat A.A., Kukreti N., Afzal M., Goyal A., Thapa R., Ali H., et al. Ferroptosis and circular RNAs: new horizons in cancer therapy. Excli. 2024;23:570–599. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Haapaniemi E., Botla S., Persson J., Schmierer B., Taipale J. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response. Nat Med. 2018;24(7):927–930. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0049-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Dahiya R., Sutariya V.B., Gupta S.V., Pant K., Ali H., Alhadrawi M., et al. Harnessing pyroptosis for lung cancer therapy: the impact of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;260:155444. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Sun Y.D., Li G.H., Zhang F., Cheng T., Zhang J.P., Zhang X.B. A p21 reporter iPSC line for evaluating CRISPR-Cas9 and vector-induced stress responses. Stem Cells. 2024;42(11):992–1005. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxae056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hussain S., Gupta G., Shahwan M., Bansal P., Kaur H., Deorari M., et al. Non-coding RNA: A key regulator in the Glutathione-GPX4 pathway of ferroptosis. Noncoding RNA Res. 2024;9(4):1222–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wang S.-W., Gao C., Zheng Y.-M., Yi L., Lu J.-C., Huang X.-Y., et al. Current applications and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01518-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ihry R.J., Worringer K.A., Salick M.R., Frias E., Ho D., Theriault K., et al. p53 inhibits CRISPR–Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. 2018;24(7):939–946. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jagadeesan D., Sathasivam K.V., Fuloria N.K., Balakrishnan V., Khor G.H., Ravichandran M., et al. Comprehensive insights into oral squamous cell carcinoma: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapeutic advances. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;261:155489. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Liu Y., Qi X., Zeng Z., Wang L., Wang J., Zhang T., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated p53 and Pten dual mutation accelerates hepatocarcinogenesis in adult hepatitis B virus transgenic mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03070-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Naganathan S.R., Oates A.C. The sweetness of embryonic elongation and differentiation. Dev Cell. 2017;40(4):323–324. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Samuel V.P., Moglad E., Afzal M., Kazmi I., Alzarea S.I., Ali H., et al. Exploring Ubiquitin-specific proteases as therapeutic targets in Glioblastoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;260:155443. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Enache O.M., Rendo V., Abdusamad M., Lam D., Davison D., Pal S., et al. Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations. Nat Genet. 2020;52(7):662–668. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0623-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Singh S., Saxena S., Sharma H., Paudel K.R., Chakraborty A., MacLoughlin R., et al. Emerging role of tumor suppressing microRNAs as therapeutics in managing non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;256:155222. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Barresi V., Musmeci C., Rinaldi A., Condorelli D.F. Transcript-targeted therapy based on RNA interference and antisense oligonucleotides: current applications and novel molecular targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16) doi: 10.3390/ijms23168875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Moore C.B., Guthrie E.H., Huang M.T., Taxman D.J. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA): design, delivery, and assessment of gene knockdown. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;629:141–158. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-657-3_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Ding Z., Ma G., Zhou B., Cheng S., Tang W., Han Y., et al. Targeting miR-29 mitigates skeletal senescence and bolsters therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell Reports Medicine. 2024;5(8):101665. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Thangavelu L., Moglad E., Gupta G., Menon S.V., Gaur A., Sharma S., et al. GAS5 lncRNA: a biomarker and therapeutic target in breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2024;260:155424. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Chen S., Heendeniya S.N., Le B.T., Rahimizadeh K., Rabiee N., Zahra Q.U.A., et al. Splice-Modulating Antisense Oligonucleotides as Therapeutics for Inherited Metabolic Diseases. BioDrugs. 2024;38(2):177–203. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00644-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Bieging K.T., Mello S.S., Attardi L.D. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(5):359–370. doi: 10.1038/nrc3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Thapa R., Afzal M., Goyal A., Gupta G., Bhat A.A., Almalki W.H., et al. Exploring ncRNA-mediated regulation of EGFR signalling in glioblastoma: from mechanisms to therapeutics. Life Sci. 2024;345:122613. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Du Y., Liu Y., Hu J., Peng X., Liu Z. CRISPR/Cas9 systems: delivery technologies and biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2023;18(6):100854. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Tonnessen-Murray C.A., Lozano G., Jackson J.G. The regulation of cellular functions by the p53 protein: cellular senescence. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7(2) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Sima N., Wang W., Kong D., Deng D., Xu Q., Zhou J., et al. RNA interference against HPV16 E7 oncogene leads to viral E6 and E7 suppression in cervical cancer cells and apoptosis via upregulation of Rb and p53. Apoptosis. 2008;13(2):273–281. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Thapa R., Bhat A.A., Gupta G., Renuka Jyothi S., Kaur I., Kumar S., et al. CRBN-PROTACs in cancer therapy: from mechanistic insights to clinical applications. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2024;104(5):e70009. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.70009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Moudry P., Chroma K., Bursac S., Volarevic S., Bartek J. RNA-interference screen for p53 regulators unveils a role of WDR75 in ribosome biogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(3):687–696. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00882-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Zhang S., Carlsen L., Hernandez Borrero L., Seyhan A.A., Tian X., El-Deiry W.S. Advanced strategies for therapeutic targeting of wild-type and mutant p53 in cancer. Biomolecules. 2022;12(4) doi: 10.3390/biom12040548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Thapa R., Gupta S., Gupta G., Bhat A.A., Smriti, Singla M., et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition to mitigate age-related progression in lung cancer. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;102 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wang H., Nan L., Yu D., Lindsey J.R., Agrawal S., Zhang R. Anti-tumor efficacy of a novel antisense anti-MDM2 mixed-backbone oligonucleotide in human colon cancer models: p53-dependent and p53-independent mechanisms. Mol Med. 2002;8(4):185–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zhang R., Wang H., Agrawal S. Novel antisense anti-MDM2 mixed-backbone oligonucleotides: proof of principle, in vitro and in vivo activities, and mechanisms. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2005;5(1):43–49. doi: 10.2174/1568009053332663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Swiatkowska A., Zydowicz P., Gorska A., Suchacka J., Dutkiewicz M., Ciesiołka J. The role of structural elements of the 5’-terminal region of p53 mRNA in translation under stress conditions assayed by the antisense oligonucleotide approach. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Vousden K.H., Prives C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell. 2009;137(3):413–431. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Yan J., Chen S., Yi Z., Zhao R., Zhu J., Ding S., et al. The role of p21 in cellular senescence and aging-related diseases. Molecules and Cells. 2024;47(11):100113. doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Kojima K., McQueen T., Chen Y., Jacamo R., Konopleva M., Shinojima N., et al. p53 activation of mesenchymal stromal cells partially abrogates microenvironment-mediated resistance to FLT3 inhibition in AML through HIF-1α–mediated down-regulation of CXCL12. Blood. 2011;118(16):4431–4439. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Lei Z.N., Tian Q., Teng Q.X., Wurpel J.N.D., Zeng L., Pan Y., et al. Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in cancer. MedComm. 2020;4(3):e265. doi: 10.1002/mco2.265. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Wang Y., Gao T., Wang B. Application of mesenchymal stem cells for anti-senescence and clinical challenges. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03497-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Zhang M., Du Y., Lu R., Shu Y., Zhao W., Li Z., et al. Cholesterol Retards Senescence in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Modulating Autophagy and ROS/p53/p21Cip1/Waf1 Pathway. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016(1):7524308. doi: 10.1155/2016/7524308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Song M., Wen J., Hua Y., Zhu Y., Xia Q., Guo Q., et al. Synthesis and anticancer properties of celastrol derivatives involved in the inhibition of VEGF. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2023;38(1):2238137. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2023.2238137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Zhang S., Zhu N., Shi Y.-N., Zeng Q., Zhang C.-J., Li H.-F., et al. Celastrol mediates CAV1 to attenuate pro-tumorigenic effects of senescent cells. Phytomedicine. 2024;129:155614. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Gopal J., Muthu M., Paul D., Kim D.-H., Chun S. Bactericidal activity of green tea extracts: the importance of catechin containing nano particles. Scientific Reports. 2016;6(1):19710. doi: 10.1038/srep19710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Shin J.-H., Jeon H.-J., Park J., Chang M.-S. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents oxidative stress-induced cellular senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells via Nrf2. Int J Mol Med. 2016;38(4):1075–1082. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Di Bernardo G., Squillaro G.T., Dell'Aversana C., Miceli M., Cipollaro M., Cascino A., et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote apoptosis and senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Dev. 2009;18(4):573–581. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Di Bernardo G., Squillaro T., Dell’Aversana C., Miceli M., Cipollaro M., Cascino A., et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors promote apoptosis and senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Dev. 2008;18(4):573–582. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Shen J., Wang Q., Mao Y., Gao W., Duan S. Targeting the p53 signaling pathway in cancers: molecular mechanisms and clinical studies. MedComm (2020) 2023;4(3):e288. doi: 10.1002/mco2.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Mandinova A., Lee S.W. The p53 pathway as a target in cancer therapeutics: obstacles and promise. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(64):64rv1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Guo S., Zhu X., Huang Z., Wei C., Yu J., Zhang L., et al. Genomic instability drives tumorigenesis and metastasis and its implications for cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;157:114036. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Hanahan D., Weinberg Robert A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Podolan M., Gelo O.C.G. The functions of safety in psychotherapy: an integrative theoretical perspective across therapeutic schools. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023;20(3):193–204. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Neves J., Sousa-Victor P., Jasper H. Rejuvenating strategies for stem cell-based therapies in aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(2):161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Li N., Zeng W., Xu S., Zhou J. Toward fine-tuned metabolic networks in industrial microorganisms. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2020;5(2):81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Zeps N., Lysaght T., Chadwick R., Erler A., Foo R., Giordano S., et al. Ethics and regulatory considerations for the clinical translation of somatic cell human epigenetic editing. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16(7):1652–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Wang Z., Sun Y. Targeting p53 for novel anticancer therapy. Transl Oncol. 2010;3(1):1–12. doi: 10.1593/tlo.09250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Regenerative Therapy are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine

RESOURCES