In 1927, construction began on the Hawks Nest Tunnel in West Virginia. Celebrated initially as an important hydroelectric project, it soon became the site of one of the worst occupational disasters in U.S. history. Nearly 3,000 workers, mostly Black men who had traveled from the South looking for work, drilled through a sandstone mountain, generating extensive silica-containing dust. Minimal dust control efforts were made, and workers were not provided with respiratory protection. In the months and years that followed, many developed severe silicosis, and close to 1,000 died, most buried nearby in unmarked graves. This disaster ultimately led to a congressional investigation and a “Stop Silicosis” workplace safety campaign led by Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins (1).
Exposure to respirable crystalline silica almost always occurs in occupational settings, and the risk of silicosis from work with silica-containing products has been known for centuries. Recently, however, a new silicosis epidemic has emerged among workers who cut and finish engineered stone (also known as artificial stone or “quartz”) countertops. This material is made of crushed stone bound by resins, with added pigments. Known for its durability, colors, and patterns, engineered stone has grown in popularity over the past decade to become the most used countertop material in the United States (2).
This rise in popularity, however, has had deadly consequences for workers. Engineered stone typically contains more than 90% crystalline silica, a much higher fraction than common natural stone materials such as granite (30%) or marble (<10%). When workers cut, polish, and finish engineered stone slabs, large quantities of silica dust can be released, together with toxic volatile organic compounds and metals. These repeated extreme exposures place workers at risk of severe, accelerated silicosis. Cases of silicosis, including advanced cases requiring lung transplantation, were first reported more than a decade ago among engineered stone countertop workers in Spain and Israel, and more than a thousand cases have since been identified worldwide (3–6).
We identified the first cases of silicosis among engineered stone countertop workers in California in 2019, and by 2023 we had identified 52 cases (3). By November 2024, the total had reached 219, including at least 14 deaths, and 26 lung transplantations. Clusters of cases have also been reported in other states (7). Engineered stone workers are rarely offered required employer-sponsored medical screening for silicosis, lack access to healthcare, and often face delayed or missed diagnoses when they do seek care (3, 8). When cases are diagnosed, healthcare providers do not report them consistently to public health authorities. Although California has expanded public health surveillance and conducted outreach to providers, the cases identified to date in California are likely just the tip of the iceberg; underrecognition of cases may be even more pronounced in other states that have not placed similar emphasis on the issue.
Notably, many engineered stone workers with silicosis are relatively young, have rapidly progressive disease, and have undergone lung transplantation or died within just a few years of diagnosis. In many countries, engineered stone countertop workers are from immigrant communities, have few workplace protections, and face difficulty accessing necessary healthcare resources. Nearly all cases in California have occurred among immigrants from Mexico and Central America, many of whom are likely undocumented (3).
This epidemic is particularly tragic, as silicosis is completely preventable. In the countertop industry, silica exposure can be reduced with water, ventilation, and fit-tested respirators. In the United States, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations require employers to keep silica dust concentrations below the permissible exposure limit of 50 μg/m3. Nonetheless, workers continue to be overexposed. Sophisticated water-fed tools and ventilation systems and appropriate respiratory protection can be expensive for the many small, informal businesses and self-employed workers in this industry, and these controls require frequent monitoring and maintenance. OSHA has inspected only several hundred of the more than 10,000 U.S. employers in this industry; most inspected employers have not been compliant with existing silica regulations (9, 10).
In Australia, where hundreds of cases of silicosis among engineered stone countertop workers have been identified since 2015, regulations were tightened to require additional control measures for engineered stone work, alongside new certification programs, inspections, and educational campaigns. A national task force was assembled to review evidence and provide recommendations. This task force found that hazardous silica dust exposure persisted despite new policies, and Australia became the first country to ban the use of engineered stone, as of July 2024 (11).
In response to the silicosis epidemic in California, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health passed an emergency temporary regulation in December 2023 tightening silica safety requirements for engineered stone work. Federal OSHA has also established an enforcement initiative. Yet enforcement efforts alone are unlikely to adequately reduce hazardous exposures to silica dust in this industry.
Comprehensive solutions are urgently needed. Following the Australian example, the United States should establish a national task force to review current evidence and provide policy recommendations for the prevention of silicosis among engineered stone countertop workers. If current policies cannot adequately protect workers, the United States should consider following in Australia’s footsteps and banning the sale of crystalline silica–containing engineered stone. This is likely to be the most effective strategy for the primary prevention of silicosis, as it does not rely on controls implemented by individual employers and workers. Recent bans by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency of two other toxic products, asbestos and methylene chloride, under Toxic Substances Control Act authority, provide a potential model for such action. In the meantime, consumers shopping for countertops can consider choosing alternative products with lower or no silica content to protect worker health.
Clinicians can also play an important role in addressing this epidemic by taking an occupational history and asking specifically about engineered stone work; diagnosed cases should be reported to public health (Table 1). In Australia, many regions have implemented government-sponsored medical screening programs for countertop workers. The United States should consider establishing a national medical screening and surveillance program for this industry, like that established in 1970 for coal miners under the legislatively mandated Coal Workers’ Health Surveillance Program. Identification of cases helps ensure that already affected workers receive appropriate medical care, and enumeration of cases via public health surveillance helps provide a continued case for policy action.
Table 1.
Clinical Guide to Silicosis in Engineered Stone Countertop Workers
| Who is at risk? |
| Workers who cut, polish, and grind engineered stone (quartz) materials can be exposed to very high concentrations of silica dust, which can cause rapidly progressive, potentially fatal silicosis. |
| Identifying patients with silicosis |
|
| Diagnostic criteria |
|
| Next steps after silicosis diagnosis |
|
| Management |
|
| Additional resources |
|
Definition of abbreviations: CT = computed tomography; PFT = pulmonary function test.
Lung biopsy is not required for silicosis diagnosis but may be warranted in cases in which the diagnosis is uncertain.
Public health reporting of silicosis cases is mandatory in certain U.S. states; providers should ensure compliance with these requirements. Voluntary reporting is encouraged in jurisdictions without reporting requirements.
Nearly a century after Hawks Nest and Frances Perkins’s Stop Silicosis campaign, workers are still dying of this preventable occupational lung disease. If silica exposures among engineered stone countertop workers continue unabated, the morbidity and mortality may ultimately dwarf the scale of the Hawks Nest Tunnel disaster. Urgent action is needed to protect vulnerable workers from this serious health hazard.
Footnotes
Supported by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health grants 2U60OH008468, U19OH012293, and 75D30122P14131. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the California Department of Public Health or the California Health and Human Services Agency.
Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202410-2008VP on January 2, 2025
Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.
References
- 1. Spencer HW. The historic & cultural importance of the Hawks Nest Tunnel disaster. Professional Safety . 2023;68:42–47. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Freedonia Group. Cleveland, OH: Freedonia Group; 2022. Engineered stone countertops.https://www.freedoniagroup.com/industry-study/engineered-stone-countertops-4395.htm [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fazio JC, Gandhi SA, Flattery J, Heinzerling A, Kamangar N, Afif N, et al. Silicosis among engineered stone (quartz) countertop workers in California. JAMA Intern Med . 2023;183:991–998. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Leso V, Fontana L, Romano R, Gervetti P, Iavicoli I. Artificial stone associated silicosis: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2019;16:568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hoy RF, Sim MR. Correspondence on “Demographic, exposure and clinical characteristics in a multinational registry of engineered stone workers with silicosis” by Hua et al. Occup Environ Med . 2022;79:647–648. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kramer MR, Blanc PD, Fireman E, Amital A, Guber A, Rhahman NA, et al. Artificial stone silicosis: disease resurgence among artificial stone workers. Chest . 2012;142:419–424. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rose C, Heinzerling A, Patel K, Sack C, Wolff J, Zell-Baran L, et al. Severe silicosis in engineered stone fabrication workers—California, Colorado, Texas, and Washington, 2017–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2019;68:813–818. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6838a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Spiegel A, Cummings KJ, Flattery J, Harrison R, Heinzerling A. Self-reported silica exposures and workplace protections among engineered stone fabrication workers in California. Am J Ind Med . 2022;65:1022–1024. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Surasi K, Ballen B, Weinberg JL, Materna BL, Harrison R, Cummings KJ, et al. Elevated exposures to respirable crystalline silica among engineered stone fabrication workers in California, January 2019–February 2020. Am J Ind Med . 2022;65:701–707. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Hazard analysis: lessons learned and initial findings from OSHA’s emphasis program on silica in engineered stone. 2024. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/silica-hazard-alert.pdf
- 11.Canberra: Safe Work Australia; 2023. Decision regulation impact statement: prohibition on the use of engineered stone.https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/decision-regulation-impact-statement-prohibition-use-engineered-stone [Google Scholar]
