Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0318827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318827

Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulation

Fittree Hayeeawaema 1, Natthawan Sermwittayawong 2, Chittipong Tipbunjong 1, Nawiya Huipao 1, Paradorn Muangnil 3, Pissared Khuituan 1,*
Editor: Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón4
PMCID: PMC12005673  PMID: 39992980

Abstract

Probiotics are well-known therapeutic agents for managing constipation and have been used to improve chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, heat-killed probiotics on CKD remain inadequately explored. This study aimed to evaluate the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria derived from natural sources and to investigate the effects of both live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides (Ln.m) on renal and gastrointestinal functions in CKD mice. Ln.m was selected from acid and bile salt intolerance tests, non-hemolytic activity, and antibiotic sensitivity. CKD mice demonstrated significantly elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels compared to control mice (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). Treatment with live and heat-killed Ln.m significantly reduced BUN and creatinine levels in CKD mice (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Additionally, kidney damage observed in CKD mice compared to control mice, including glomerular necrosis, tubular dilatation, inflammation, and fibrosis, was significantly alleviated following live and heat-killed Ln.m treatments. CKD-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction was characterized by an imbalance in Firmicutes/Bacteroidota populations, increased colonic uremic toxin (p < 0.01), reduced fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (p < 0.05), and constipation. Treatment with live and heat-killed Ln.m restored gut microbiota, decreased uremic toxin (p < 0.001), increased SCFAs (p < 0.05), and alleviated constipation. In summary, both live and heat-killed Ln.m effectively alleviated gastrointestinal dysfunction and renal damage in CKD mice, primarily through modulation of the intestinal environment. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of live and heat-killed Ln.m as the gastrointestinal dysfunction treatment in CKD.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition characterized by the gradual loss of kidney function. The kidneys play essential roles in maintaining fluid, acid, and mineral balance and eliminating metabolic waste products and toxins. Consequently, the decline in kidney function leads to metabolic waste and toxins accumulation in the body [1]. CKD is a significant global health concern, as its advanced stages can result in severe complications, including cardiovascular diseases, anemia, and gastrointestinal disorders [1,2]. In CKD patients, waste products such as urea accumulate in the systemic circulation and enter the gastrointestinal lumen, disrupting the gut microbiota in a condition known as uremic dysbiosis [3]. This dysbiosis represents an imbalance between the two dominant phyla of gut microbiota: Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Bacteroidota). CKD patients exhibit reduced gut microbiota diversity and bacterial abundance, with a marked increase in the proportion of Firmicutes [4]. Similarly, in 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx) rats, the abundance of Bacteroides increased, while Lactobacillus populations decreased. Both bacterial species were significantly associated with urinary protein excretion [2]. Moreover, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), the key microbial metabolites such as acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were significantly reduced alongside the declining diversity of gut microbiota in CKD mice [5]. Reduced SCFAs production has been identified as a critical factor contributing to intestinal dysmotility, including constipation, in CKD patients [1].

Constipation is the most common gastrointestinal complication associated with CKD and is influenced by multiple factors, including dietary restrictions, medications, and comorbidities such as diabetes. These factors collectively contribute to alterations in gut microbiota [6]. While constipation itself is not life-threatening, it significantly accelerates the progression of CKD to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [7]. CKD patients with constipation are at a substantially higher risk of developing ESRD compared to those without constipation [6]. Several mechanisms link constipation to CKD progression. Prolonged intestinal transit exacerbates gut microbiota dysbiosis, leading to an increased production of gut-derived uremic toxins such as indole and p-Cresol. These toxins are absorbed into the bloodstream and metabolized into indoxyl sulfate and p-Cresol sulfate, respectively. Normally, they are excreted by the kidneys, but these compounds accumulate in the circulation in CKD patients, contributing to kidney fibrosis and further disease progression [68]. Given its significant impact, constipation is a critical complication in CKD that necessitates effective therapeutic strategies with minimal side effects. Alongside pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological approaches including exercise, prebiotics, and probiotics have demonstrated beneficial effects in managing constipation and supporting kidney health in CKD patients [9].

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) define probiotics as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host.” Most probiotics belong to the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) group and are primarily derived from the healthy human gastrointestinal tract [10]. Probiotics have shown promising effects in managing CKD. In adenine-induced CKD rats, four weeks of probiotic treatment improved gut microbiota dysbiosis, increased SCFAs production, and reduced intestinal permeability and uremic toxin levels [11]. Similarly, treating nephrectomy (Nx) rats with a Lactobacillus mixture not only improved blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels but also mitigated gut dysbiosis, glomerular sclerosis, and kidney fibrosis and effectively reversing kidney damage [2]. Furthermore, dietary supplementation with probiotics has been reported to decrease BUN, indoxyl sulfate, and p-cresyl sulfate levels, underscoring their potential as an intervention in both CKD animal models and clinical trials [3,12,13]. Probiotics exert their beneficial effects on CKD through several mechanisms: i) modulating gut microbiota composition, ii) antagonizing pathogenic bacteria by releasing bacteriocins and competing for nutrients and adhesion sites, iii) enhancing epithelial integrity by increasing mucus secretion and strengthening epithelial tight junctions, and iv) increasing the production of SCFAs, which play a crucial role in gut and kidney health. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of probiotics in addressing CKD-related complications through multiple pathways [12].

Some probiotics, such as Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus acidophilus, have been isolated from human feces, while others originate from animal gastrointestinal tracts [14]. With the increasing use of probiotics and the growing probiotic market, numerous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains with probiotic properties have been developed from natural sources. To be considered probiotics, these bacteria must demonstrate safety, tolerance to acid and bile salts, and provide measurable health benefits, such as anti-cancer effects, gut microbiota modulation, anti-microbial activity, or inhibition of toxin production [15]. In addition to live probiotics, inactivated probiotics, also known as paraprobiotics, offer the potential for CKD improvement [3]. Paraprobiotics are defined as “inactivated non-viable microbial cells or cell fractions that confer a health benefit to the consumer” [16]. These inactivated forms can avoid the potential risks of live probiotics, such as translocation from the gastrointestinal tract to the bloodstream, which is particularly relevant for vulnerable populations, including pediatric or immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, paraprobiotics are easier to transport, store, and standardize compared to their live counterparts [17]. Previous studies have demonstrated that inactivated probiotics can retain their health benefits. For example, heat-killed (HK) Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-263 was shown to reduce insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. Similarly, HK Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (HKLp-nF1) improved defecation status, intestinal health, and cytokine levels in loperamide-induced constipated rats, with effects comparable to live probiotics [18,19]. Both live and HK probiotics have shown positive effects on gastrointestinal health across multiple studies; however, the specific effects of HK probiotics in CKD remain underexplored.

Thus, this study aims to investigate the impact of both live and HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides (Ln.m) on gastrointestinal functions in CKD mice, providing new insights into the potential applications of heat-killed probiotics in managing CKD.

Materials and methods

Screening of isolated LAB from the gastrointestinal tract of shrimp

Bacterial strains and growth condition.

To isolate the LAB from different natural sources, fermented cabbage, fermented garlic, Sea bass’s gastrointestinal content, and Tiger prawn’s gastrointestinal content were collected under hygienic conditions. The samples were homogenized and incubated in the De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth at 37°C with shaking at 150 revolutions per minute (RPM) for 24 h. Afterward, the serial dilution was performed before plating on the MRS agar and incubated at 37°C for 24 h in the anaerobic condition. The colonies were selected from their different morphology. The preliminary experiment was performed by acid tolerance test and found that only the LAB from Tiger prawn gastrointestinal content could survive. Ten LAB strains, P.6.1, P.6.4, P.6.6, P.7.1, P.7.2, P.7.4, P.7.5, P.9.1, P.10.1, and P.11.4, were selected and re-cultured in MRS broth at 30°C with shaking at 150 RPM for 24 h. In this study, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lactiplantibacillus casei (L. casie) ATCC 7469 (TISTR 047) were used as probiotic standards.

Acid and bile salt tolerance.

To test the acid tolerance, 1% of 109 CFU/mL culture was transferred into MRS broth at pH 7 (control), pH 4, or pH 3, and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. To test bile salt tolerance, the cultured was transferred into MRS broth containing 0, 0.2, and 0.3% (w/v) of bile salt (Ox gall; conjugated bile salt), and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. Serial dilution was performed at each time point, and the surviving bacteria were enumerated on the MRS agar plate as biomass (CFU/mL). The assays were done in 3 replicates. The survival rate was calculated as survival rate (%) = biomass at time/biomass at time 0 x 100.

Antibiotic susceptibility.

The susceptibility test was performed by the disc diffusion method [20]. Overnight cultures of the isolated strains in MRS broth were adjusted to 109 CFU/mL and spread on Mueller Hinton agar. The following antibiotic discs (Oxoid) were used: amikacin (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), gentamycin (10 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), sulbactam (20 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg). Antibiotic discs were placed on the agar after the spread strain was dry. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h in the anaerobic condition. Inhibition zones around antibiotic discs were measured in millimeters (mm). The sensitivity or resistance was indicated following the previous studies [2123].

Hemolytic activity.

Hemolysis was tested according to Somashekaraiah et al. (2019) [15]. The LAB strains were streaked onto blood agar with 5% (w/v) blood. Hemolytic patterns were observed after 37 °C incubation for 48 h in the anaerobic condition. The results were described as β-hemolysis (complete hemolysis) which appeared as a transparent zone surrounding the colony, α-hemolysis (partial or incomplete hemolysis) which appeared as a greenish zone surrounding the colony, and γ-hemolysis when the medium around the colony remained unchanged.

Inactivation of LAB.

Heat inactivation of bacteria was performed based on the previous methods with slight modifications [18,24]. The selected LAB strain was grown in MSR broth in the anaerobic condition at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min and washed twice with 0.85% NaCl [15]. Bacterial cells were resuspended in 0.85% NaCl and then inactivated in the water bath at 100 °C for 10 min. The HK bacteria were freeze-dried and kept at –80 °C until used. The freeze-dried bacteria powder was suspended in sterile distilled water to be administered to the mice.

Effects of selected LAB on CKD mice

Animals.

Male ICR mice (7–8 weeks old) were purchased from Nomura Siam International Co., Ltd., Thailand, and housed at the Southern Laboratory Animal Facility, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. Animals were housed under the controlled environmental standard: a 12 h light/ dark cycle, at 23–27 °C, in 50–55% humidity, with free access to the standard chow and water ad libitum. Mice were allowed to adapt to the environment for a week before the experiments. The mice were divided into six experimental groups (10 animals/group) as follows: 1. Control: healthy mice receiving distilled water, 2. CKD + water: CKD-induced mice receiving distilled water, 3. CKD + LLp: CKD-induced mice receiving 2 × 109 CFU live L. plantarum (LLp), a standard probiotic (ATCC 14917), 4. CKD +  HKLp.: CKD-induced mice receiving 2 × 109 CFU HK L. plantarum (HKLp), 5. CKD +  LLn.m: CKD-induced mice receiving 2 × 109 CFU live Leuconostoc mesenteroides (LLn.m) (the selected LAB), and 6. CKD +  HKLn.m: CKD-induced mice receiving 2 × 109 CFU HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides (HKLn.m). To induce CKD, mice in all groups (except the control group) were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected with 50 mg/kg adenine once a day for 28 days. After CKD induction, mice were orally administered LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, or HKLn.m once a day (daily) for 28 days. Freeze-dried live and HK probiotics were freshly re-suspended in sterilized distilled water before oral gavage, with each mouse receiving 0.2 mL/day. Body weight (BW), food and water intake, and general health were monitored every day during the experimental period. At the end of the experiment, mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection with 70 mg/kg thiopental sodium for sample collection and were sacrificed by cervical dislocation [25]. All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Prince of Songkla University, Thailand (Ethical clearance MHESI 6800.11/911).

Biochemical and complete blood count parameters.

Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture from mice under deep anesthesia. The complete blood count (CBC) analysis was performed using BC-2800Vet Auto Hematology Analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, China). CBC analysis parameters measured included white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes, red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelets (PLT), and mean platelet volume (MPV). Whole blood samples were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 min to separate plasma. Plasma levels of BUN, creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were analyzed using the BS-20 Chemistry Analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, China).

Gut microbiota population.

The colonic content of mice was collected in sterile conditions and genomic DNA was extracted. The 16S rRNA genes of the gut microbiota population were amplified by PCR at the V3-V4 region [26]. The amplicons were purified with a PCR product purification kit (Illumina). The samples were library-prepared and qualified for sequencing by Novaseq sequencing. The cluster sequences were denoised by the DADA2 method. The generated Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were analyzed to identify common and unique ASVs between samples. The results were presented as a flower diagram. Beta diversity represents the obvious microbial community based on the diversity of the microbial composition indicated by the species and abundance in the ASV data. Beta diversity was analyzed using Unifac distance and the differences among samples were analyzed by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) [27].

Uremic toxins.

Collected colonic contents were kept at –80 °C until used. Samples were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline at 1:9 (w/v) and mixed before centrifuging at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered through a 0.2 µm nylon filter. The concentration of indole and p-Cresol were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), using a 4.0 × 250 mm Agilent Hypersil ODS C18 column (USA). The UV detector and column temperature were set at 220 nm and 35 °C. Mobile phases A and B were 50% Milli-Q water and 50% acetonitrile, flowing at 0.5 mL/min. SCFAs produced by microbial fermentation, including acetate, propionate, lactate, and butyrate, were analyzed by HPLC, using a 300 × 8.0 mm Shodex SUGAR SH1011 column (Tokyo, Japan). The UV detector and column temperature were set at 215 nm and 50 °C. The eluent solvent was 5 mM H2SO4, flowing at 0.5 mL/min [28]. Concentrations of uremic toxins and SCFAs were calculated by area of peak compared to the standard control using Chemstation software (Version CHEM32, USA).

Constipation.

Constipation was determined by decreasing defecation frequency, fecal water content, and gastrointestinal transit. To record the frequency of defecation, feces were collected for 4 h and fecal pellets were counted as the number of defecations. To measure fecal water content, collected wet feces were weighed and then dried at 100°C for 30 min before being weighed dry. The fecal water content (%) was calculated by:

Fecal water content %=wet weight dry weightwet weight×100

The upper gastrointestinal transit was calculated by using the charcoal meal (10% activated charcoal and 5% gum acacia) method. Mice were orally administered 0.2 mL charcoal meal for 30 min before anesthetized. The distance of the charcoal marker traveled and the total small intestinal length was measured with cotton thread immediately after anesthetization and abdominal incisions were made. Gastrointestinal transit (%) was calculated by:

Gastrointestinal transit %=distance of charcoal meal markertotal length of the small intestine×100

Intestinal smooth muscle contractility.

After anesthetized, the ileum and distal colon were sectioned and immediately placed in cold Krebs solution. A 1 cm of tissue was suspended in an organ bath containing Krebs solution. The temperature of the bath was maintained at 37 °C with continuously oxygenated with carbogen. Each tissue was placed under initial tension at 0.5 g before the contractility was recorded. Smooth muscle contractions were detected by a force transducer (Model FT03, Grass, MA, USA), recorded by the PowerLab System (AD Instruments, New South Wales, Australia), and analyzed by LabChart7 software. Smooth muscle contractility was determined by the motility index as described by Hoibian et al., 2018 [29] and calculated as Ln((number of peaks ×  sum of peak amplitudes) +  1).

Kidney and colon histopathology.

After euthanized, the kidney and intestine were removed and fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h. Tissues were dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol, embedded in paraffin, cross-sectioned at 5 µm in the paraffin block, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or Masson’s Trichrome, following standard protocols. Stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Olympus DP73). Glomerular necrosis was determined by Bowman’s capsule space, distal tubular dilatation was determined by the diameter of the tubule, and the frequency of inflammation was determined by the appearance of cellular infiltration. Kidney fibrosis was expressed as the area of fibrosis (%) which was determined by measuring the red threshold from 0–120 in the Image J software [30]. Intestinal pathologies, such as abnormal morphology, inflammation, and fibrosis in the submucosal layer were also determined.

Statistical analysis.

The data were presented as means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test was used for significant differences analysis. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was set as statistically significant.

Results

Acid and bile salt tolerances of LAB

The acid and bile salt tolerance tests evaluated the ability of isolated LAB strains to withstand the acidic conditions of the stomach and bile salt concentrations of the small intestine, ensuring their potential to reach the colon. Results indicated that LAB strains in control conditions (pH 7, 0% bile salt) showed a gradual increase in survival rates over 3 h, reflecting their normal growth (Figs 1A and 1D). At pH 4 and pH 3 with 0% bile salt, most strains exhibited survival rates exceeding 90%, except for strains P.7.2, P.10.1, and P.11.4, which showed survival rates dropping below 60% at pH 3 (Figs 1B and 1C). In the presence of bile salts, only L. plantarum, P.6.1, and P.6.6 demonstrated significant tolerance. Both L. plantarum and P.6.6 maintained survival rates exceeding 60% in 0.2% bile salt, while P.6.1 was entirely inhibited under the same conditions after 3 hours (Fig 1E). At 0.3% bile salt, only L. plantarum and P.6.1 achieved survival rates above 60%, but neither could persist beyond 2 hours (Fig 1F).

Fig 1. Acid and bile salt tolerances of isolated lactic acid bacteria (LAB).

Fig 1

A, B, and C: The survival rate (%) in acid when LAB was incubated at pH 7 (control), pH 4, and pH 3 for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. D, E, and F: The survival rate (%) in bile salt when LAB was incubated in 0% (control), 0.2%, and 0.3% bile salt for 0, 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). L. plantarum; Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, L. casei; Lactobacillus casei.

Antibiotic susceptibility of LAB

All isolated strains were sensitive to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, sulbactam, and tetracycline but resistant to amikacin, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin 10, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin. All sensitive except L. plantarum were resistant to cefoxitin and clindamycin (S1 Table).

Hemolytic activity of LAB

All the isolated LAB strains showed no hemolytic activity, except P.7.5, which produced a transparent zone under the colony. Therefore, P.7.5 exhibited complete hemolysis (β–hemolysis). Taken together, most isolated LAB was tolerant to low pH for 3 h of incubation, while only P.6.6 was tolerant for 3 h of incubation in 0.2% bile salt. Even though P.6.1 could tolerate 0.3% bile salt, it could do so only for 2 h of incubation. The antibiotic susceptibility test showed most of the LAB were sensitive to antibiotics. Some resistance was observed; L. plantarum resisted ceftriaxone, L. plantarum, L. casei, P.7.1, and P.7.4 resisted kanamycin, P.7.4 resisted gentamicin, L. casei and P.7.1 resisted streptomycin, and all antibiotics strains, except P.7.1, and P.7.4, resisted vancomycin.

P.6.1 and P.6.6 showed similar antibiotic-resistant profiles, but P.6.6 was more susceptible to antibiotics than P.6.1. Therefore, P.6.6 was selected as the probiotic for further study. Before using P.6.6 as a probiotic, 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed to identify the bacterial species. Sequence analysis identified P.6.6 as Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on body weight, and water and food intakes in CKD mice

The gradual increase in body weight (BW) observed in the control group throughout the experimental period reflected normal growth. In contrast, mice in the CKD group showed a significant reduction in BW compared to the control group from day 21 to day 28 of the induction period and up to day 7 of the treatment period (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in BW were detected between the CKD probiotic treatment groups and the untreated CKD group (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on body weight, water intake, food intake, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice.

Fig 2

A, B, and C: Body weight (%), water intake (mL), and food intake (g) of mice during 28 days of CKD induction and 28 days of probiotic treatments, respectively. D and E: BUN (mg/dL) and plasma creatinine levels (mg/dL) of mice after treatments. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n =  5–10). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 when compared to the control group; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 when compared to the CKD group.

Water intake in the CKD group was significantly higher than in the control group from day 7 to day 28 of the induction period (p < 0.001) and from day 7 to day 14 of the treatment period (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05). No significant differences in water intake were observed between the CKD probiotic-treated groups and the CKD group (Fig 2B). Although food intake was lower in the CKD and CKD probiotic-treated groups compared to the control during the induction period, the differences were not statistically significant (Fig 2C). In summary, water intake in the CKD group increased significantly from the onset of CKD induction through the treatment period, while BW decreased, with no change in food intake. These findings suggest that CKD mice experienced higher glomerular filtration rates and increased water excretion during and after CKD induction.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on BUN and plasma creatinine levels in CKD mice

At the end of the experiment, BUN and plasma creatinine levels were measured to evaluate the severity of CKD. BUN levels in the CKD group (38.60 ± 4.67 mg/dL) were significantly higher than in the control group (19.92 ± 1.50 mg/dL) (p < 0.001). In contrast, CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m exhibited significantly lower BUN levels compared to the untreated CKD group (p < 0.01) (Fig 2D). Similarly, plasma creatinine levels were significantly elevated in the CKD group (0.31 ± 0.07 mg/dL) compared to the control group (0.14 ± 0.02 mg/dL) (p < 0.01). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly reduced plasma creatinine levels relative to the untreated CKD group (p < 0.05) (Fig 2E). These findings suggest that both live and HK Ln.m have beneficial effects on reducing CKD severity, comparable to those of a standard probiotic.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on hematological parameters and liver function in CKD mice

No significant differences were observed in any hematological parameters, indicating the absence of anemia or systemic inflammation in the CKD mice (S2 Table). Liver function was assessed by measuring liver enzyme levels. While no significant differences were observed in AST and ALT levels between the groups (S1A and S1B Figs), ALP levels were significantly higher in the CKD group (67.36 ± 5.17 U/L) compared to the control group (47.61 ± 5.89 U/L) (p < 0.05), suggesting liver damage or infection in the CKD group. Treatment with probiotics resulted in lower ALP levels in the CKD groups compared to the untreated CKD group. Notably, the reduction in ALP levels was significant in CKD mice treated with live and HK Ln.m (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05), indicating a potential reduction in liver damage in these groups (S1C Fig).

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on gut microbiota population in CKD mice

A total of 107 common ASVs were shared among the six samples. The CKD group exhibited only 72 unique ASVs, compared to 224 unique ASVs in the control sample. Probiotic-treated groups demonstrated higher numbers of unique ASVs compared to the CKD group, with 138, 309, 253, and 136 unique ASVs observed in CKD.LLp, CKD.HKLp, CKD.LLn.m, and CKD.HKLn.m, respectively (Fig 3A). These findings suggest reduced gut microbiota diversity in the CKD group relative to both the control and probiotics-treated groups.

Fig 3. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on gut microbiota populations in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice.

Fig 3

A: The flower diagram shows the common ASVs shared in six samples. B: PCoA plot showing PC1 and PC2 determination in six samples. C and D: Bacteria at phylum and genus levels. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

The PCoA plot revealed that PC1 and PC2 accounted for 73.95% and 11.48% of the variation in sample composition. The CKD sample was distinctly separated from the control and treatment groups. Notably, CKD.LLn.m and CKD.HKLn.m exhibited microbial compositions similar to the control group, while CKD.LLp and CKD.HKLp displayed less similarity to the control but remained distinct from the CKD group (Fig 3B).

The phylum- and genus-level composition and proportions in each sample were analyzed based on ASV data, revealing differences in taxonomic levels among groups. The percentages of bacteria from the phylum Firmicutes in the control, CKD, CKD + LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m groups were 45.77%, 51.49%, 44.86%, 47.53%, 45.03%, and 46.23%, respectively. Bacteria from the phylum Bacteroidota (Bacteroides) accounted for 40.72%, 20.83%, 37.65%, 37.40%, 35.95%, and 36.42% of the bacterial population in these groups, respectively. The phylum Verrucomicrobiota was notably more abundant in the CKD group (17.54%) compared to other groups (Fig 3C). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Muribaculaceae was lower in the CKD group than in other groups, whereas the relative abundances of Lactobacillus and Akkermansia were higher in the CKD group. Although CKD.LLp showed a trend toward reversing the effects of CKD, it displayed a bacterial genera profile similar to the CKD group, indicating that it did not effectively restore the microbiota composition to normal levels (Fig 3D).

The results indicated that the CKD group exhibited a lower number of unique ASVs, a distinct separation from other groups in microbiota composition, and an imbalance between bacteria of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidota. Additionally, the CKD group demonstrated increased relative frequencies of Lactobacillus and Akkermansia compared to the control group. These findings suggest significant alterations in gut microbiota in the CKD group. Treatment with live and HK Ln.m effectively mitigated these changes, preventing the uremia-induced disruptions in gut microbiota composition.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on colonic uremic toxin concentrations in CKD mice

Uremic toxins derived from gut microbiota, including indole and p-Cresol, were elevated in CKD mice. The indole level in the CKD group (65.50 ± 2.11 µg) was significantly higher than in the control group (7.36 ± 4.27 µg). However, treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly reduced indole levels in CKD mice (p < 0.001) (Fig 4A). Similarly, the p-Cresol level was significantly elevated in the CKD group (46.75 ± 1.29 µg) compared to the control group (36.57 ± 1.53 µg). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly decreased p-Cresol levels compared to the untreated CKD group (p < 0.001) (Fig 4B). The elevation of these uremic toxin precursors in CKD mice, and their reduction following treatment with live and HK Ln.m, likely resulted from gut microbiota modulation.

Fig 4. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on colonic uremic toxin and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentrations in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice.

Fig 4

A: The colonic concentrations of indole. B: The colonic concentrations of p-Cresol. C: The colonic concentrations of acetate. D: The colonic concentrations of butyrate. E: The colonic concentrations of lactate. F: The colonic concentrations of propionate. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 5–9). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 when compared to control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 when compared to the CKD group.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on short-chain fatty acid concentrations in CKD mice

The alteration of gut microbiota in CKD mice may have influenced the levels of SCFAs. A significant decrease in acetate levels was observed in the CKD group (32.39 ± 6.80 mM) compared to the control group (67.59 ± 14.62 mM) (p < 0.05). Acetate levels were significantly higher in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 4C). Similarly, butyrate levels were significantly lower in the CKD group (18.28 ± 7.33 mM) compared to the control group (61.36 ± 11.00 mM) (p < 0.05). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly increased butyrate levels compared to the CKD group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) (Fig 4D). Lactate concentrations were significantly reduced in the CKD group (14.69 ± 1.46 mM) compared to the control group (25.89 ± 0.74 mM) (p < 0.001). However, lactate levels significantly increased in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m compared to the CKD group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 4E). Similarly, propionate levels were significantly lower in the CKD group (4.94 ± 2.02 mM) than in the control group (39.60 ± 11.89 mM) (p < 0.01). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly increased propionate levels compared to the CKD group (p < 0.05) (Fig 4F).

These findings suggest that the reduction in SCFAs observed in CKD mice resulted from gut microbiota alterations. Treatment with live and HK Ln.m not only improved gut microbiota composition but also simultaneously enhanced the production of beneficial metabolites.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on constipation and intestinal motility in CKD mice

The frequency of defecation was significantly lower in the CKD group (7.3 ± 0.51 times/h) compared to the control group (11.30 ± 1.13 times/h) (p < 0.05). CKD groups treated with probiotics, including LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m, showed a significant increase in defecation frequency compared to the CKD group (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 5A). A similar trend was observed in fecal water content. The CKD group exhibited a significant decrease in fecal water content (0.34 ± 0.05%) compared to the control group (0.44 ± 0.01%) (p < 0.05). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly increased fecal water content compared to the CKD group (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively) (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on constipation and intestinal motility in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice.

Fig 5

A: Frequency of defecation. B: fecal water content. C: small intestinal transit. D: small intestinal motility. E: Large intestinal motility. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 5–10). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 when compared to control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 and ###p < 0.001 when compared to CKD group.

Small intestinal transit was significantly reduced in the CKD group (50.42 ± 2.42%) compared to the control group (60.07 ± 1.97%) (p < 0.05). Probiotic treatments with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly improved small intestinal transit compared to the CKD group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 5C). Small intestinal smooth muscle motility was significantly lower in the CKD group (1.22 ± 0.60 AU) compared to the control group (2.41 ± 0.30 AU) (p < 0.01). Treatment with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m significantly improved intestinal motility compared to the CKD group (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 5D). Similarly, colonic smooth muscle motility was significantly reduced in the CKD group (0.76 ± 0.27 AU) compared to the control group (1.92 ± 0.28 AU) (p < 0.01). However, this loss of motility was significantly reversed in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig 5E).

The results indicated that the CKD group experienced a reduction in defecation frequency, fecal water content, and upper gut transit, all of which are indicative of constipation. Additionally, intestinal motility was impaired in CKD mice. However, treatment with both live and HK Ln.m effectively alleviated constipation symptoms in CKD mice.

Effects of live and HK Ln.m on kidney and intestinal histology in CKD mice

H&E staining revealed abnormal renal corpuscle structure in the kidney tissue of CKD mice. Large spaces were observed between Bowman’s capsule and the glomerulus (Fig 6A, marked with a red asterisk), indicating glomerular necrosis in CKD mice. The spaces in the CKD group (10.70 ± 1.00 µm) were significantly larger than those in the control group (4.25 ± 0.30 µm) (p < 0.001). However, the spaces were significantly reduced in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m compared to the CKD group (p < 0.001) (Fig 6B). Additionally, tubular dilatation, marked by the green hash symbol in Fig 6A, was evident in the kidneys of CKD mice. The diameter of the distal tubule in the CKD group (18.80 ± 0.21 µm) was significantly larger than that in the control group (8.51 ± 0.14 µm) (p < 0.001). The tubule diameter was significantly smaller in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m compared to the CKD group (p < 0.001) (Fig 6C). Furthermore, cellular infiltration, indicated by the dashed line in Fig 6A, was observed in the CKD kidneys. The frequency of inflammation was significantly higher in the CKD group (1.84 ± 0.41 times) compared to the control group (0.30 ± 0.12 times) (p < 0.001) but was significantly lower in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively) (Fig 6D).

Fig 6. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on kidney histopathology in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice.

Fig 6

A: H & E staining of kidney tissues. Red asterisk: glomerular necrosis; green hash symbol: tubular dilatation; dash line: inflammatory cellular infiltration. B: Glomerular necrosis was determined as the Bowman’s space. C: The diameter of distal tubules. D: The frequency of inflammation. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 3–5). ***p < 0.01 when compared to control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, and ###p < 0.001 when compared to the CKD group.

Masson’s Trichrome staining indicated an area of fibrosis in the CKD group (Fig 7A). The area of fibrosis in the CKD group (5.70 ± 0.30%) was significantly larger compared to the control group (3.00 ± 0.23%) (p < 0.001). However, the fibrosis area was significantly reduced in CKD mice treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m compared to the CKD group (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) (Fig 7B).

Fig 7. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on renal fibrosis.

Fig 7

A: Masson’s Trichome staining of kidney tissue. B: Area of fibrosis (%). CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 3–5). ***p < 0.01 when compared to control group; ##p < 0.01 and ###p < 0.001 when compared to CKD group.

H&E staining of small intestinal tissue showed damage to the intestinal mucosal layer in CKD mice, including inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig 8A, red dashed line) and villus shortening. Treatment with probiotics alleviated the inflammation, and villus length, measured from the top of the villus to the crypt (indicated by the red line in Fig 8A), was significantly shortened in the CKD group (115.9 ± 9.73 µm) compared to the control group (160.60 ± 6.16 µm) (p < 0.01). The villi were significantly longer in the CKD groups treated with LLp, HKLp, LLn.m, and HKLn.m compared to the CKD group (p < 0.01) (Fig 8B). Similarly, the colon showed mucosal damage (red asterisk in S2 Fig.) and inflammation (red dashed line) in CKD mice, which was alleviated by probiotic treatment.

Fig 8. Effects of live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides on small intestinal histology.

Fig 8

A: H & E staining of small intestinal tissues. Red dash line: inflammatory cell infiltration; red line: the length of villi which was measured from the top of the villus to the crypt. B: The measurement of villi length. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as means ± SEM (n = 3). **p < 0.01 when compared to control group; ##p < 0.01 when compared to CKD group.

The kidney and intestine of CKD mice displayed significant pathological changes, including glomerular necrosis, tubular dilatation, inflammatory infiltration, and kidney fibrosis. This study highlighted the association between CKD and the gastrointestinal tract, where kidney damage in CKD adversely affected intestinal health. Probiotic treatment with live and HK Ln.m alleviated both kidney and intestinal damage in CKD mice.

Discussion

Constipation is a common complication among CKD patients. While in healthy individuals, constipation is often caused by various factors and is not typically life-threatening [6], its implication in CKD is more severe. Declining kidney function leads to the accumulation of uremic toxins in the bloodstream, which subsequently enter the gastrointestinal tract, altering the gut microbiota and exacerbating constipation [1]. This creates a cycle where worsening kidney function and increased urea accumulation are linked to more severe constipation. Beyond its impact on quality of life, constipation plays a significant role in CKD progression and is often associated with cardiovascular complications [6,8]. Probiotics have shown promise in modulating gut microbiota, improving gastrointestinal health, and potentially slowing CKD progression [12]. Inactivated probiotics, or paraprobiotics, have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for CKD. These non-viable probiotics offer similar benefits to live probiotics while reducing the risk of microbial translocation, particularly in vulnerable populations. However, further research is needed to fully understand their effects in CKD contexts [3]. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of both live and heat-killed (HK) Leuconostoc mesenteroides (Ln.m) probiotics on gastrointestinal functions in CKD mice.

The ability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains to survive in gastric juice and bile salt is critical for their viability and functionality as probiotics. To benefit the host, LAB strains must withstand highly acidic environments (pH 2.5 to 3.5) and bile salt concentrations ranging from 0.03% to 0.3% [31]. Among the strains studied, strain P.6.6 demonstrated the highest survival rate under these conditions. Previous studies have shown that bacteria capable of tolerating acid and bile salts without significant cell loss possess probiotic properties and exhibit strong intestinal viability [15,31]. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted to assess the safety of the LAB strains, given that plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistance genes can transfer between bacterial strains, posing a potential health risk [32]. Susceptibility was evaluated using 13 different antibiotic discs [23]. Most LAB strains were sensitive to all antibiotics tested, except vancomycin. Previous research has indicated that LAB isolated from natural sources are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, such as ampicillin, but sensitive to principal antibiotics like chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and tetracycline [33]. LAB strains from fermented foods have also shown resistance to antibiotics primarily targeting gram-negative bacteria, such as amikacin, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Importantly, this resistance is an intrinsic property of the LAB genus and is not transferable to pathogenic bacteria or microbial flora, ensuring their safety as probiotics [20]. The acid and bile salt tolerance studies confirmed that strain P.6.6, identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides, could survive in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, hemolytic activity and antibiotic susceptibility demonstrated the strain’s safety for probiotic use. Consequently, strain P.6.6 was selected for use as a probiotic in an adenine-induced CKD study, where its probiotic properties were compared with those of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, a standard probiotic.

L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) is a gram-positive, heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium (LAB) renowned for its health-promoting properties as a probiotic. It is commonly found in fermented foods, beverages, and in the gastrointestinal tracts of fish and shrimp [34,35]. Research has highlighted the probiotic potential of Ln.m in various contexts. For instance, Ln.m isolated from kimchi demonstrated its ability to prevent lead accumulation in mice by enhancing lead resistance and promoting its removal [36]. Another strain, Ln.m (FB111), isolated from mustard kimchi, showed potential in preventing cholesterol absorption in Caco-2 cells, suggesting its beneficial role in the food industry [37]. Moreover, Ln.m (EH-1), isolated from Mongolian curd cheese, was shown to reduce blood glucose levels in type-1 diabetic mice by increasing butyric acid concentrations. The effect is mediated through the free fatty acid receptor 2 (Ffar2) [35]. Beyond live probiotics, inactivated forms of Ln.m or its exopolysaccharides also offer potential health benefits. For example, dextran produced by Ln.m (742) was found to enhance the growth of Bacteroides and other beneficial bacteria in an in vitro human fecal fermentation model, indicating its potential to support gut health [38].

In this study, we assessed the effects of live and heat-killed (HK) L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) on CKD mice. From the onset of adenine-induced CKD to the beginning of the treatment period, water intake in the CKD group increased, while body weight (BW) decreased. These observations indicated the onset of renal failure in the early stages of CKD in the adenine-induced model. The high volume of water excretion observed is an early effect of adenine-induced CKD, where adenine downregulates sodium-potassium chloride cotransporters (NKCC) and aquaporin 2 (AQP2) in renal epithelial cells, leading to significant fluid loss and increased urine output. In addition to fluid loss, impaired kidney function resulted in elevated BUN and plasma creatinine levels, consistent with findings from previous studies [39,40]. Treatment with live and HKLn.m resulted in decreased BUN and creatinine levels in CKD mice. While the specific effects of Ln.m as a probiotic in CKD have not been widely reported, previous studies on probiotics in both human and animal models have documented reductions in BUN and creatinine levels, which helped alleviate CKD symptoms [3,12]. Additionally, the exopolysaccharides produced by Ln.m were shown to alleviate CKD symptoms in mice by improving gastrointestinal function. These compounds reduced lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, endotoxin levels, and intestinal barrier defects in CKD mice [41]. The improvements in gastrointestinal function were reflected in the decreased plasma levels of BUN and creatinine, highlighting the potential benefits of Ln.m as a therapeutic agent for CKD.

Uremic dysbiosis in CKD is characterized by a shift in the gut microbiota, marked by a reduction in beneficial bacteria and an increase in pathogenic, proteolytic, and urease-producing bacteria. The gut microbiota in CKD exhibits distinct alterations: first, reduced abundance and diversity of gut microbiota, second, decreased Lactobacillus population and changes in the Bacteroides population, and lastly, increased production of metabolites and toxins, with a decrease in SCFAs. The gut microbiota communicates with the host through the enteric nervous system (ENS) and vagus nerve which control intestinal homeostasis [42,43]. Therefore, the microbial changes impair gastrointestinal functions, including barrier integrity, absorption, and motility [2,3,12,43]. In our study, we observed an imbalance between the Firmicutes and Bacteroidota phyla in CKD, a finding indicative of gut dysbiosis. Interestingly, we also noted an increase in Lactobacillus which is a result consistent with the previous finding [5]. A possible explanation for this is that CKD leads to reduced intestinal protein absorption. Some Lactobacillus strains, such as Lactobacillus gasseri, can utilize purines and reduce purine absorption. Furthermore, CKD-induced reductions in intestinal motility could prolong microbial fermentation or proteolysis, which may favor the proliferation of Lactobacillus [44,45]. Our results indicated that both live and heat-killed Ln.m (HKLn.m) were effective in reversing gut microbiota alterations. They increased the population of beneficial gut microbiota, reduced uremic toxin precursors, and boosted SCFAs production in CKD mice. Probiotics modulate the gut microbiota primarily through two mechanisms: i) enhancing epithelial cell proliferation and integrity, promoting inflammatory response, and improving the gastrointestinal mucosa and ii) directly modifying the gut microbiota by improving the gut environment. These actions are bidirectional, as improvements in epithelial integrity affect microbiota composition and vice versa. In contrast, inactivated probiotics, such as HKLn.m, can only modify the gut microbiota by promoting a healthy gastrointestinal mucosa, which, in turn, affects the microbiota composition [46].

Constipation is a common complication in CKD patients, often linked to gastrointestinal dysfunction and alterations in gut microbiota. These changes play a significant role in the progression of CKD to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [6,9]. The gut microbiota alterations in CKD are not only associated with the enhancement of harmful metabolites such as indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, hippuric acid, or trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) but also with a reduction in beneficial metabolites, like SCFAs [47]. In this study, CKD mice treated with L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) exhibited improved defecation status and enhanced intestinal smooth muscle motility. These findings are consistent with previous reports, where inactivated probiotics were shown to improve gastrointestinal symptoms in hemodialysis children. Symptoms such as anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, distension, and constipation were significantly reduced after one to two months of treatment [48]. The effects of L. mesenteroides on gastrointestinal functions in this study may result from the modulation of the intestinal environment, including the regulation of gut microbiota, reduction of uremic toxin precursors (such as indole and p-Cresol), and an increase in SCFAs levels. The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the development and maturation of the ENS, which in turn affects gut motility. It was reported that the germ-free condition affects the bacterial composition leading to gastrointestinal dysfunctions [49]. Gastrointestinal transit time was found to be increased in germ-free mice, and colonization by specific pathogens could stimulate the migrating motor complex and normalize gut transit time [50]. Microbial metabolites like lactate and SCFAs (acetate, propionate, and butyrate) enhance gastrointestinal motility through several mechanisms, including interactions with serotonin (5-HT), and the regulation of motor and secretory functions in the ENS. The ENS itself stimulates secretion, motility, and contractile activity, directly promoting gut motility [48]. Furthermore, colonic infusion with SCFAs has been shown to reduce intestinal transit time and stimulate the mucosal and vagus nerves, further enhancing intestinal smooth muscle contraction [50,51].

In addition to elevated BUN and creatinine levels, kidney structural damage is a significant indicator of CKD progression in animal models, reflecting the pathophysiology observed in humans. Structural changes in the kidney include tubular atrophy, focal hypertrophy, glomerular necrosis, and fibrosis, although the specific changes may vary depending on the animal model used [52]. Our histopathological analysis revealed that the kidneys of CKD mice exhibited glomerular necrosis, tubular dilatation, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis. The mechanism behind adenine-induced kidney damage involves the metabolism of adenine via the xanthine pathway, producing 2,8-dihydroxyadenine (DHA). DHA is deposited in the renal tubules, leading to renal inflammation, structural damage, and progressive functional decline over time [39]. Additionally, in CKD, indoxyl sulfate (IS), a metabolite derived from gut microbiota processing of tryptophan, accumulates and correlates with CKD progression. IS induces inflammation, increases oxidative stress in the kidneys, and contributes to glomerular sclerosis and renal fibrosis [53]. In this study, we observed increased levels of IS and p-Cresol sulfate (PCS) precursors, which are linked to renal fibrosis in CKD. Histopathological changes were also detected in the small and large intestines of CKD mice. Treatment with L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) resulted in the improvement of all pathological damage observed in both the kidneys and intestines. This connection between CKD and gastrointestinal dysfunction has been well-documented in previous studies [3,12,40,54]. A proposed mechanism suggests a vicious cycle between CKD, constipation, and gut microbiota alterations that contribute to CKD progression. Our findings align with previous reports suggesting that the modulation of the gut microbiota and intestinal environment may alleviate CKD progression [55].

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) exhibits probiotic properties and that heat-killed L. mesenteroides (HKLn.m) is equally effective as live Ln.m in alleviating constipation and slowing CKD progression in a mouse model. The beneficial effects of both live and HK Ln.m appear to be mediated through modulation of the gut microbiota and an increase in SCFAs production. Based on these findings, we propose that L. mesenteroides (Ln.m) can be considered a promising probiotic, with HKLn.m potentially offering a novel therapeutic approach for improving constipation in CKD patients and slowing the progression of the disease. However, further research is needed to explore the effects of HKLn.m on other gastrointestinal functions, such as the intestinal barrier and luminal environment, and to better understand the mechanisms by which HKLn.m influences gastrointestinal health.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Effects of live and HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides on liver function in CKD mice.

The liver function was investigated by enzyme levels after the treatment period. A, B, and C: The AST, ALT, and ALP levels, respectively. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). #p < 0.05 when compared to the control group; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 when compared to the CKD group (one-way ANOVA repeated by Bonferroni test).

(TIF)

pone.0318827.s001.tif (27MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Effects of live and HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides on large intestine histology.

The H & E staining of small intestinal tissue was stained with H & E to investigate the histological morphology of the large intestine in CKD mice. The structure of the colon was the same way with the small intestine, the tissue staining showed mucosal damage and inflammation in the CKD group. While in CKD treated with probiotic groups ameliorated this effect of CKD on the colon. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

(TIF)

pone.0318827.s002.tif (36.2MB, tif)
S1 Table. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated lactic acid bacteria.

(TIF)

pone.0318827.s003.pdf (141KB, pdf)
S2 Table. Effects of heat-inactivated Leuconostoc mesenteroides on hematological parameters.

(PDF)

pone.0318827.s004.pdf (104.6KB, pdf)
S3 Table. Nutritional composition of mice feed.

(PDF)

pone.0318827.s005.pdf (25.6KB, pdf)
S1 File. Raw data.

(XLSX)

pone.0318827.s006.xlsx (58.2KB, xlsx)
S2 File. Raw data for ASV analysis.

(XLSX)

pone.0318827.s007.xlsx (70.1KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mr. Thomas Coyne, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University for assisting in proofreading and providing feedback on the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This research is supported by a grant from the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT): NRCT5-RGJ63019-160. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ikee R, Sasaki N, Yasuda T, Fukazawa S. Chronic kidney disease, gut dysbiosis, and constipation: a burdensome triplet. Microorganisms. 2020;8(12):1862. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yoshifuji A, Wakino S, Irie J, Tajima T, Hasegawa K, Kanda T, et al. Gut Lactobacillus protects against the progression of renal damage by modulating the gut environment in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(3):401–12. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mafra D, Borges N, Alvarenga L, Esgalhado M, Cardozo L, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P Dietary components that may influence the disturbed gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2019;11(3):496. doi: 10.3390/nu11030496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vaziri ND. CKD impairs barrier function and alters microbial flora of the intestine: a major link to inflammation and uremic toxicity. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(6):587–92. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328358c8d5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang H, Li K, Lee Y, Chen M. Preventive effects of lactobacillus mixture against chronic kidney disease progression through enhancement of beneficial bacteria and downregulation of gut-derived uremic toxins. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(26):7353–66. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sumida K, Yamagata K, Kovesdy CP. Constipation in CKD. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;5(2):121–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramos CI, Armani RG, Canziani ME, Dolenga CJ, Nakao LS, Campbell KL, et al. Bowel habits and the association with uremic toxins in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. J Ren Nutr. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lu C-Y, Chen Y-C, Lu Y-W, Muo C-H, Chang R-E. Association of constipation with risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1481-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramos CI, Nerbass FB, Cuppari L. Constipation in chronic kidney disease: it is time to bridge the gap. Kidney Dialysis. 2022;2(2):221–33. doi: 10.3390/kidneydial2020023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Żukiewicz-Sobczak W, Wróblewska P, Adamczuk P, Silny W. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria and their potential in the prevention and treatment of allergic diseases. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2014;39(1):104–8. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2014.42134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Inatomi T, Honma M. Ameliorating effect of probiotics in a rat model of chronic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0281745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koppe L, Mafra D, Fouque D. Probiotics and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88(5):958–66. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Taki K, Takayama F, Niwa T. Beneficial effects of Bifidobacteria in a gastroresistant seamless capsule on hyperhomocysteinemia in hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2005;15(1):77–80. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2004.09.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zielińska D, Kolożyn-Krajewska D. Food-origin lactic acid bacteria may exhibit probiotic properties: review. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–15 [Online] [Cited 2019 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2018/5063185/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Somashekaraiah R, Shruthi B, Deepthi BV, Sreenivasa MY. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from neera: a naturally fermenting coconut palm nectar. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de Almada CN, Almada CN, Martinez RCR, Sant’Ana AS. Paraprobiotics: Evidences on their ability to modify biological responses, inactivation methods and perspectives on their application in foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016;58:96–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.09.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Piqué N, Berlanga M, Miñana-Galbis D. Health benefits of heat-killed (tyndallized) probiotics: an overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2534. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hsieh F-C, Lan CE, Huang T-Y, Chen K-W, Chai C-Y, Chen W-T, et al. Heat-killed and live Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-263 exhibit similar effects on improving metabolic functions in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. Food Funct. 2016;7(5):2374–88. doi: 10.1039/c5fo01396h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Park S-A, Lee G-H, Hoang T-H, Lee H-Y, Kang I-Y, Chung M-J, et al. Heat-inactivated Lactobacillus plantarum nF1 promotes intestinal health in Loperamide-induced constipation rats. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abbasiliasi S, Azmi TI, Mohd Daud H, Shuhaimi M, Rosfarizan M, Ariff A. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic sensitivity of three isolates of lactic acid bacteria from fermented fish product, Budu. Malays J Microbiol. 2009;5:33–7. doi: 10.21161/mjm.15008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.de Paula AT, Jeronymo-Ceneviva AB, Silva LF, Todorov SD, Franco BDGM, Penna ALB. Leuconostoc mesenteroides SJRP55: a potential probiotic strain isolated from Brazilian water buffalo mozzarella cheese. Ann Microbiol. 2015;65(2): doi: 10.1007/s13213-014-0933-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Giles-Gómez M, Sandoval García JG, Matus V, Campos Quintana I, Bolívar F, Escalante A. In vitro and in vivo probiotic assessment of Leuconostoc mesenteroides P45 isolated from pulque, a Mexican traditional alcoholic beverage. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2370-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Todorov SD, LeBlanc JG, Franco BDGM. Evaluation of the probiotic potential and effect of encapsulation on survival for Lactobacillus plantarum ST16Pa isolated from papaya. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28(3):973–84. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0895-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Karimi Ardestani S, Tafvizi F, Tajabadi Ebrahimi M. Heat-killed probiotic bacteria induce apoptosis of HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cell line via the regulation of Bax/Bcl2 and caspases pathway. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2019;38(9):1069–81. doi: 10.1177/0960327119851255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sakena K, Peerakietkhajorn S, Siringoringo B, Muangnil P, Wichienchot S, Khuituan P. Oligosaccharides from Gracilaria fisheri ameliorate gastrointestinal dysmotility and gut dysbiosis in colitis mice. J Funct Foods. 2020;71:104021. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li R, Wang F, Dang S, Yao M, Zhang W, Wang J. Integrated 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and metabolomics analysis to investigate the important role of osthole on gut microbiota and serum metabolites in neuropathic pain mice. Front Physiol. 2022;13:813626. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.813626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Trevelline BK, Kohl KD. The gut microbiome influences host diet selection behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(17):e2117537119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117537119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Woranuch K, Sankasa N, Sakamoto T, Sukhumsirichart W. Evaluation of mannooligosaccharide production from konjac by using recombinant mannanase of Bacillus sp. SWU60 as a prebiotic in vitro and in vivo. Sci Eng Health Stud. 2021;21030010. doi: 10.14456/sehs.2021.41 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoibian E, Florens N, Koppe L, Vidal H, Soulage CO. Distal colon motor dysfunction in mice with chronic kidney disease: putative role of uremic toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(5):204. doi: 10.3390/toxins10050204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Siringoringo B, Huipao N, Tipbunjong C, Nopparat J, Wichienchot S, Hutapea AM, et al. Gracilaria fisheri oligosaccharides ameliorate inflammation and colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction in mice with acetic acid-induced colitis. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2021;11(10):440–9. doi: 10.4103/2221-1691.326098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sui Y, Liu J, Liu Y, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Gao B, et al. In vitro probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus strains from fermented tangerine vinegar and their cholesterol degradation activity. Food Biosci. 2021;39:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100843 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luan C, Yan J, Jiang N, Zhang C, Geng X, Li Z, et al. Leuconostoc mesenteroides LVBH107 Antibacterial Activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis and anti-inflammatory activity against P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 Cells. Nutrients. 2022;14(13):2584. doi: 10.3390/nu14132584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Selim KM, El-Sayed HM, El-Hady MA, Reda RM. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic candidates isolated from the gut of Clarias gariepinus with special reference to the in vivo assessment of live and heat-inactivated Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Edwardsiella sp. Aquacult Int. 2019;27(1):33–51. doi: 10.1007/s10499-018-0297-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ringø E, Gatesoupe J. Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a review. Aquaculture. 1998.;160:177–203. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00299-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Traisaeng S, Batsukh A, Chuang T-H, Herr DR, Huang Y-F, Chimeddorj B, et al. Leuconostoc mesenteroides fermentation produces butyric acid and mediates Ffar2 to regulate blood glucose and insulin in type 1 diabetic mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7928. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64916-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yi Y-J, Lim J-M, Gu S, Lee W-K, Oh E, Lee S-M, et al. Potential use of lactic acid bacteria Leuconostoc mesenteroides as a probiotic for the removal of Pb(II) toxicity. J Microbiol. 2017;55(4):296–303. doi: 10.1007/s12275-017-6642-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Le B, Yang S-H. Effect of potential probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides FB111 in prevention of cholesterol absorption by modulating NPC1L1/PPARα/SREBP-2 pathways in epithelial Caco-2 cells. Int Microbiol. 2019;22(2):279–87. doi: 10.1007/s10123-018-00047-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.George C, Matsha TE, Erasmus RT, Kengne AP. Haematological profile of chronic kidney disease in a mixed-ancestry South African population: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e025694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dos Santos IF, Sheriff S, Amlal S, Ahmed RPH, Thakar CV, Amlal H. Adenine acts in the kidney as a signaling factor and causes salt- and water-losing nephropathy: early mechanism of adenine-induced renal injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;316(4):F743–57. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00142.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hayeeawaema F, Muangnil P, Jiangsakul J, Tipbunjong C, Huipao N, Khuituan P. A novel model of adenine-induced chronic kidney disease-associated gastrointestinal dysfunction in mice: The gut-kidney axis. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023;30(6):103660. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hung TV, Wanatanbe J, Yonejima Y, Hisa K, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki T. Exopolysaccharides from Leuconostoc mesenteroides attenuate chronic kidney disease in mice by protecting the intestinal barrier. J Funct Foods. 2019;52:276–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.11.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen Y, Liu Q, Meng X, Zhao L, Zheng X, Feng W. Catalpol ameliorates fructose-induced renal inflammation by inhibiting TLR4/MyD88 signaling and uric acid reabsorption. Eur J Pharmacol. 2024;967:176356. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhu Z, Gu Y, Zeng C, Yang M, Yu H, Chen H, et al. Olanzapine-induced lipid disturbances: a potential mechanism through the gut microbiota-brain axis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:897926. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.897926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cigarran Guldris S, González Parra E, Cases Amenós A. Gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nefrologia. 2017;37(1):9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamada N, Iwamoto C, Kano H, Yamaoka N, Fukuuchi T, Kaneko K, et al. Evaluation of purine utilization by Lactobacillus gasseri strains with potential to decrease the absorption of food-derived purines in the human intestine. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2016;35(10-12):670–6. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2015.1125000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adams CA. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutr Res Rev. 2010;23(1):37–46. doi: 10.1017/S0954422410000090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rysz J, Franczyk B, Ławiński J, Olszewski R, Ciałkowska-Rysz A, Gluba-Brzózka A. The Impact of CKD on uremic toxins and gut microbiota. Toxins (Basel. 2021;13(4):252. doi: 10.3390/toxins13040252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mohammed DY, AboZeid AM, Neemat-Allah MAA, Zakaria YG. Effect of heat killed probiotic and wheat bran on gastrointestinal symptoms in hemodialysis children. AJPN. 2018;6(5):1–5. doi: 10.19080/AJPN.2018.06.555757 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li H, Zhou Y, Liao L, Tan H, Li Y, Li Z, et al. Pharmacokinetics effects of chuanxiong rhizoma on warfarin in pseudo germ-free rats. Front Pharmacol. 2023;13:1022567. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1022567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dimidi E, Christodoulides S, Scott SM, Whelan K. Mechanisms of action of probiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota on gut motility and constipation. Adv Nutr. 2017;8(3):484–94. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barbara G, Stanghellini V, Brandi G, Cremon C, Di Nardo G, De Giorgio R, et al. Interactions between commensal bacteria and gut sensorimotor function in health and disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(11):2560–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00230.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Diwan V, Brown L, Gobe GC. Adenine-induced chronic kidney disease in rats. Nephrology. 2018;23(1):5–11. doi: 10.1111/nep.13180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu W-C, Tomino Y, Lu K-C. Impacts of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate on chronic kidney disease and mitigating effects of ast-120. Toxins. 2018;10(9):367. doi: 10.3390/toxins10090367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vaziri ND, Wong J, Pahl M, Piceno YM, Yuan J, DeSantis TZ, et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):308–15. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mishima E, Fukuda S, Shima H, Hirayama A, Akiyama Y, Takeuchi Y, et al. Alteration of the Intestinal environment by lubiprostone is associated with amelioration of adenine-induced CKD. JASN. 2015;26(8):1787–94. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014060530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón

3 Dec 2024

PONE-D-24-41563Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulationPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. KHUITUAN,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please consider the suggestions done by the reviewers to improve the manuscript

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 17 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf   and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“FH: the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (NRCT5-RGJ63-160)”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This study aims to evaluate the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from Tiger prawn and to investigate the effects of selected probiotics both live and heat-killed on renal and gastrointestinal functions in CKD mice. The study presents the results of primary scientific research. Nevertheless, the manuscript and experiments still showed many problems.

1. Why authors choose to isolated LAB strains from Tiger prawn?

2. In line 105, “the gastrointestinal tract” should be changed to “the content of gastrointestinal tract”

3. Why isolated LAB strains were cultured with shaking at 150 rpm?

4. The procedure of strains isolation is not detailed enough. For example, when the incubated broth of isolated sample was plated on the MRS agar, had the broth undergone gradient dilution?

5. In line 108, the “24 h.” should be modified as “24 h”.

6. In line 111, the “Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lactobacillus casei ATCC 7469” should be changed to “Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lacticaseibacillus casei ATCC 7469”.

7. The methods and results for isolated strain identification were missing.

8. Why Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lacticaseibacillus casei ATCC 7469 were used as probiotic standards?

9. In line 154-155, the strain information of L. plantarum is missing.

10. In line 156-157, the strain information of Leuconostoc mesenteroides is missing.

11. The numbers of mice in each experimental group should be given.

12. In Fig 3B, all the samples of each group should be illustrated.

13. Why not evaluated the alpha-diversity of gut flora?

Reviewer #2: The study design is appropriate. The results have been properly reported and discussed by using relevant literature. As specific comments, please check for typos in the full text. Also, make sure that all of the references have been reported in the text or in the references list. It should be noted that the authors indicated the composition of the ration that the mice received. 

Reviewer #3: I am writing to submit my review report for the manuscript entitled “Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulation " for your consideration. Overall, I find the manuscript's findings intriguing and the information provided useful for researchers and academia. The article has the potential to make a significant contribution to the related discipline..

However, I have some concerns regarding the clarity, detail, and precision of different sections, which I outline below:

I recommend that the authors address these concerns and provide a revised version of the manuscript for further consideration

• Abstract-Keep a proper sequence in the abstract and end with conclusion. Focus on the gap you have covered in your study

• L-23 Abstarct- mention numerical values for better understanding>>CKD mice 23 treated with live and heat-killed Ln.m showed blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels significantly 24 increased in the CKD compared to the control group, nevertheless, they were significantly reduced 25 in both live and heat-killed probiotic-treated groups. Kidney damage, Firmicutes/Bacteroidota 26 imbalance, increasing colonic uremic toxin, decreasing fecal short-chain fatty acids, and constipation 27 were observed in CKD.

• L-29 Abstract�Reconsider and remove repetition - Taken together, Ln.m could be considered 29 a probiotic, and heat-killed Ln.m exhibits a similar effect to its live form in alleviating gastrointestinal 30 dysfunction and the progression of renal damage in CKD mic

• L-59 Introduction – is it a reference statement???????????? As a result, there is 58 growing interest in strategies to manipulate and restore beneficial microbiota to improve health outcomes in the female 59 reproductive tra

• L-47 Need little attention for better understanding - Notably, short-chain 47 fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, which are microbial metabolites, 48 decreased along with the decreasing diversity of gut microbiota in CKD mice (5). It was reported that 49 the alteration of gut microbiota and consequent reduction of SCFAs production played

• L-58-check the cited reference- Prolonged intestinal transit has bidirectional effects with gut microbiota alteration that 59 result in increased gut-derived uremic toxins such as indole and p-Cresol which will be absorbed and 60 metabolized into indoxyl sulfate and p-Cresol sulfate, respectively. Indoxyl sulfate and p-Cresol 61 sulfate are normally excreted by the kidneys, but in CKD, the toxins accumulate in the circulation 62 and cause kidney fibrosis (6–8)

• L-92 You mean parabiotics???????????? ). Using inactivated probiotics could avoid the potential risks of live probiotics on 92 vulnerable or pediatric patients by translocating from the gastrointestinal tract to the blood of these 93 patients. In addition to the safety aspect, inactivated probiotics are easier to transport, store, and 94 standardize than live probiotics (‘

• The introduction could be improved by providing more context and background from following latest references,

o doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.116503

o doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176356

o https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122380

o .doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1364841

• L-105 Please elaborate the conditions for better understanding- To isolate the LAB from the gastrointestinal tract of Tiger prawn, the gastrointestinal tract 106 was collected under hygienic conditions. The sample was homogenized and incubated in the De Man, 107 Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth at 37℃ with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. It was plated on the MRS 108 agar and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. in the

• L-150 Check RPM- aerobic condition at 37ºC with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. The bacteria were harvested 143 by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min and washed twice with 0. 85% NaCl. Bacterial cells were 144 resuspended in 0. 85% NaCl and then inactivated in the water bath at 100ºC for 10 min. The HK 145 bacteria were freeze- dried and kept at –80ºC until used. The freeze- dried bacteria powder was 146 suspended in sterile distilled water to be administer

• L-159 need clarity ----After 28 days of induction, mice were administered treatments once a day for 28 days. 160 Freeze-dried live and HK probiotics were re-suspended in sterilized distilled water freshly before oral 161 gavage with a final volume of 0.2 mL/mouse/day. Body weight (BW), and food and water intake of 162 all mice were measured every day during the experimental period and their general health was 163 monitored. At the end of the experiment,

• This statement is creating confusion- Another part of the whole blood was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 10 min. From this sample, 175 BUN, plasma creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and alkaline 176 phosphatase (ALP) levels were measured by BS-20 Chemistry Analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, 177 China

• Cite the following latest references in discussion section

o doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.897926

o doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S107917

o doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01461

o 10.1186/s13020-023-00745-5

o doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1022567

o doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1166022

o

• L-212Insert as equation- he distance of the charcoal marker traveled and the total small intestinal length was 211 measured with cotton thread immediately after anesthetization and abdominal incisions were made. 212 Gastrointestinal transit (%) was calculated as (distance of charcoal meal marker/total length of the 213 small intestine) × 100.

• What about other metabolites- The alteration of gut microbiota in CKD was not only related to the enhancement of harmful 510 metabolites (uremic toxins) but also associated with the reduction of beneficial metabolites (SCFAs) 511 (45). In the present study, CKD mice treated with Ln.m showed improved defecation status and 512 intestinal smooth muscle motility

• Tables check the duplications-able

• Italic all the scientific names,

• Remove grammatical mistakes

• Need to rewrite the conclusion

� Recheck Legends description is as per figure number and discussion-

� I urge the authors to improve the English language for better flow of literature.

� Please check reference style throughout MS

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Dr. Muhammad Afzaal

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 24;20(2):e0318827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318827.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Jan 2025

Manuscript Ref. No.: PONE-D-24-41563

Title: Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulation

Fittree Hayeeawaema, Natthawan Sermwittayawong, Chittipong Tipbunjong, Nawiya Huipao, Paradorn Muangnil, Pissared Khuituan

Responses to Comments by Editor and Reviewers

Editor's and Reviewers' comments:

Editor:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We are very grateful to the Reviewing Editor for his interest in our work and inviting us to submit a revised manuscript. We have carefully considered the reviewers’ recommendations and comments. As the Reviewing Editor asked about meeting PLOS ONE style templates, we have edited the manuscript following the guidelines.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “FH: the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (NRCT5-RGJ63-160)” Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

The funder had no role in this study and we have stated this role in the manuscript.

3. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

We (all authors) decided to share the raw data in the supplemental file.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

We have considered the editor's recommendation and decided to remove the phrase “data not shown” which is not a core part of the research.

Reviewer #1:

This study aims to evaluate the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from Tiger prawn and to investigate the effects of selected probiotics both live and heat-killed on renal and gastrointestinal functions in CKD mice. The study presents the results of primary scientific research. Nevertheless, the manuscript and experiments still showed many problems.

1. Why authors choose to isolated LAB strains from Tiger prawn?

We thank the reviewer for the careful evaluation of our manuscript. We performed the preliminary study to isolate the LAB from various natural sources including fermented cabbage, fermented garlic, the gastrointestinal content of Sea bass, and the gastrointestinal content of the Tiger prawn. Next, we screened the LAB from different sources by acid tolerance tests and we found that only the LAB from Tiger prawn gastrointestinal content could survive after one hour. We have added the detail in the manuscript (see Page 7, lines 113-114, 118-120)

2. In line 105, “the gastrointestinal tract” should be changed to “the content of gastrointestinal tract”

Following the recommendation of the reviewer, the context was changed. (see Page 7, line 114)

3. Why isolated LAB strains were cultured with shaking at 150 rpm?

The shaking condition was according to a previous study (Soundharrajan et al., 2023). The lactic acid bacteria are mostly facultative anaerobic. Practically, shaking 150 RMP was to mix the nutrition in the media through the tube and avoid the oxygen gradient.

4. The procedure of strains isolation is not detailed enough. For example, when the incubated broth of isolated sample was plated on the MRS agar, had the broth undergone gradient dilution?

Following the reviewer's recommendation, we have added more details following the reviewer’s suggestion. After the samples were homogenized and incubated in MRS broth, the culture media was diluted as serial dilution before spread on the MRS agar. (see Page 7, line 116-117)

5. In line 108, the “24 h.” should be modified as “24 h”.

The abbreviation of an hour was modified as “h” throughout the manuscript.

6. In line 111, the “Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lactobacillus casei ATCC 7469” should be changed to “Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lacticaseibacillus casei ATCC 7469”.

The name of the bacteria was changed throughout the manuscript.

7. The methods and results for isolated strain identification were missing.

MALDI Biotyper identified the isolated bacteria; the report is shown below (from the Scientific Equipment Center).

8. Why Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 (TISTR 877) and Lacticaseibacillus casei ATCC 7469 were used as probiotic standards?

This study was to evaluate the probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria from natural sources to use as a probiotic treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD) mice. The Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus casei are probiotics that have been found in natural sources and have promising effects in a wide range such as antioxidant, improve constipation, and irritable bowel disease (IBD) (Jang et al., 2018; Swain et al., 2014; Yamada et al., 2018). Moreover, this study also investigated the effect of heat-inactivated probiotics on the gastrointestinal tract of CKD mice and both Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus casei have been reported that they provide positive effects on the gastrointestinal tract (Jang et al., 2018; Sang et al., 2015). Therefore, using Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus casei is to expect a similar or better effect from selected LAB.

9. In line 154-155, the strain information of L. plantarum is missing.

The ATCC of L. plantarum has been included. (see Page 9, line 166)

10. In line 156-157, the strain information of Leuconostoc mesenteroides is missing.

We don’t have the ATCC of Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolated from Tiger prawn.

11. The numbers of mice in each experimental group should be given.

We added the number of mice in the manuscript.

12. In Fig 3B, all the samples of each group should be illustrated.

The study aimed to screen the broad trending of microbial shifting on group–level (Ray et al., 2019). Therefore, we used the pooled method which has long been used for bacterial community screening such as infection, antibiotic use, and CKD population (Banjong et al., 2023). Therefore, the sample of each group in Fig 3B was a pooled – DNA from the colonic content of each mouse in the group.

13. Why not evaluated the alpha-diversity of gut flora?

Since alpha diversity of gut flora is the biodiversity within an individual group, in this study, we focus on the changes at the group level. Hence, the pooled sample could not provide the calculation of alpha-diversity in each group.

Reviewer #2: The study design is appropriate. The results have been properly reported and discussed by using relevant literature. As specific comments, please check for typos in the full text. Also, make sure that all of the references have been reported in the text or in the references list. It should be noted that the authors indicated the composition of the ration that the mice received.

We thank the reviewer for the interest in our work and valuable comments on our manuscript. We have checked and edited the manuscript according to the reviewer’s recommendation. For the nutritional composition, we have reported in the supplemental data. It contains 12% moisture, 24% crude protein, 4.5% fat, 5% fiber, 1.0% calcium, 0.9% phosphorus, 0.20% sodium, 1.17% potassium, 0.23% magnesium, 171 p.p.m. manganese, 22 p.p.m. copper, 100 p.p.m. zinc, 180 p.p.m. iron, 1.82 p.p.m. cobalt, 1 p.p.m. potassium iodide, 0.1 p.p.m. selenium, Vitamins; A: 20,000 i.u./kg, D: 4,000 i.u./kg, E: 100 mg/kg, K: 5 mg/kg, B1: 20 mg/kg, B2: 20 mg/kg, B6: 20 mg/kg, B12: 0.036 mg/kg, niacin: 100 mg/kg, folic acid: 6 mg/kg, biotin: 0.4 mg/kg, pantothenic acid: 60 mg/kg, and choline chloride: 1,500 mg/kg.

Reviewer #3: I am writing to submit my review report for the manuscript entitled “Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulation " for your consideration. Overall, I find the manuscript's findings intriguing and the information provided useful for researchers and academia. The article has the potential to make a significant contribution to the related discipline.

However, I have some concerns regarding the clarity, detail, and precision of different sections, which I outline below:

I recommend that the authors address these concerns and provide a revised version of the manuscript for further consideration

• Abstract-Keep a proper sequence in the abstract and end with conclusion. Focus on the gap you have covered in your study

• L-23 Abstarct- mention numerical values for better understanding>>CKD mice 23 treated with live and heat-killed Ln.m showed blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels significantly 24 increased in the CKD compared to the control group, nevertheless, they were significantly reduced 25 in both live and heat-killed probiotic-treated groups. Kidney damage, Firmicutes/Bacteroidota 26 imbalance, increasing colonic uremic toxin, decreasing fecal short-chain fatty acids, and constipation 27 were observed in CKD.

• L-29 Abstract�Reconsider and remove repetition - Taken together, Ln.m could be considered 29 a probiotic, and heat-killed Ln.m exhibits a similar effect to its live form in alleviating gastrointestinal 30 dysfunction and the progression of renal damage in CKD mic

We are grateful to the reviewer for his interest in our work and careful manuscript evaluation.

Following the reviewer’s recommendation, we have edited the abstract in the abstract part.

• L-59 Introduction – is it a reference statement???????????? As a result, there is 58 growing interest in strategies to manipulate and restore beneficial microbiota to improve health outcomes in the female 59 reproductive tra

We are not sure about the reviewer’ comment, because line 59 stated about constipation in CKD.

• L-47 Need little attention for better understanding - Notably, short-chain 47 fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetic, propionic, and butyric acids, which are microbial metabolites, 48 decreased along with the decreasing diversity of gut microbiota in CKD mice (5). It was reported that 49 the alteration of gut microbiota and consequent reduction of SCFAs production played

Following the reviewer’s comment, we have rewritten the text in the manuscript. “Moreover, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), the key microbial metabolites such as acetic, propionic, and butyric acids were significantly reduced alongside the declining diversity of gut microbiota in CKD mice (Huang et al., 2021). Reduced SCFAs production has been identified as a critical factor contributing to intestinal dysmotility, including constipation, in CKD patients (Ikee et al., 2020). (see Page 3, line 49-53)

• L-58-check the cited reference- Prolonged intestinal transit has bidirectional effects with gut microbiota alteration that 59 result in increased gut-derived uremic toxins such as indole and p-Cresol which will be absorbed and 60 metabolized into indoxyl sulfate and p-Cresol sulfate, respectively. Indoxyl sulfate and p-Cresol 61 sulfate are normally excreted by the kidneys, but in CKD, the toxins accumulate in the circulation 62 and cause kidney fibrosis (6–8)

We have rechecked the references following the reviewer’s comment.

• L-92 You mean parabiotics???????????? ). Using inactivated probiotics could avoid the potential risks of live probiotics on 92 vulnerable or pediatric patients by translocating from the gastrointestinal tract to the blood of these 93 patients. In addition to the safety aspect, inactivated probiotics are easier to transport, store, and 94 standardize than live probiotics (‘

The inactivated probiotics are also known as parabiotics, paraprobiotics, or tyndallized probiotics.

• The introduction could be improved by providing more context and background from following latest references,

o doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.116503

o doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176356

o https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122380

o .doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1364841

Thank you for suggesting these potential references. We appreciate your recommendation and took the time to thoroughly review the article. However, we found that some references do not directly align with the scope or findings of our study. As such, we have decided to include some references for citation (Reference #42)

• L-105 Please elaborate the conditions for better understanding- To isolate the LAB from the gastrointestinal tract of Tiger prawn, the gastrointestinal tract 106 was collected under hygienic conditions. The sample was homogenized and incubated in the De Man, 107 Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth at 37℃ with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. It was plated on the MRS 108 agar and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. in the

We elaborated the text in the manuscript for better understanding following the reviewer’s comment. “To isolate the LAB from different natural sources, fermented cabbage, fermented garlic, Sea bass's gastrointestinal content, and Tiger prawn's gastrointestinal content were collected under hygienic conditions. The samples were homogenized and incubated in the De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth at 37℃ with shaking at 150 revolutions per minute (RPM) for 24 h. Afterward, the serial dilution was performed before plating on the MRS agar and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h in the anaerobic condition. The colonies were selected from their different morphology”. (see Page 7, line 113-118)

• L-150 Check RPM- aerobic condition at 37ºC with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. The bacteria were harvested 143 by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min and washed twice with 0. 85% NaCl. Bacterial cells were 144 resuspended in 0. 85% NaCl and then inactivated in the water bath at 100ºC for 10 min. The HK 145 bacteria were freeze- dried and kept at –80ºC until used. The freeze- dried bacteria powder was 146 suspended in sterile distilled water to be administer

We have checked the text from the reviewer’s comment and found that the RPM at 150 for shaking and at 8,000 for 10 min for harvesting the bacterial pellet was performed following the previous study (Somashekaraiah et al., 2019).

• L-159 need clarity ----After 28 days of induction, mice were administered treatments once a day for 28 days. 160 Freeze-dried live and HK probiotics were re-s

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_Hayeeawaema et al..docx

pone.0318827.s008.docx (1,013.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón

22 Jan 2025

Live and heat-killed Leuconostoc mesenteroides counteract the gastrointestinal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease mice through intestinal environment modulation

PONE-D-24-41563R1

Dear Dr. KHUITUAN,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón

PONE-D-24-41563R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. KHUITUAN,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Guadalupe Virginia Nevárez-Moorillón

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Effects of live and HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides on liver function in CKD mice.

    The liver function was investigated by enzyme levels after the treatment period. A, B, and C: The AST, ALT, and ALP levels, respectively. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Data were shown as mean ± SEM (n = 7–10). #p < 0.05 when compared to the control group; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 when compared to the CKD group (one-way ANOVA repeated by Bonferroni test).

    (TIF)

    pone.0318827.s001.tif (27MB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Effects of live and HK Leuconostoc mesenteroides on large intestine histology.

    The H & E staining of small intestinal tissue was stained with H & E to investigate the histological morphology of the large intestine in CKD mice. The structure of the colon was the same way with the small intestine, the tissue staining showed mucosal damage and inflammation in the CKD group. While in CKD treated with probiotic groups ameliorated this effect of CKD on the colon. CKD; chronic kidney disease, LLp; live Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, HKLp; Heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, LLn.m; Live Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and HKLn.m; Leuconostoc mesenteroides.

    (TIF)

    pone.0318827.s002.tif (36.2MB, tif)
    S1 Table. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated lactic acid bacteria.

    (TIF)

    pone.0318827.s003.pdf (141KB, pdf)
    S2 Table. Effects of heat-inactivated Leuconostoc mesenteroides on hematological parameters.

    (PDF)

    pone.0318827.s004.pdf (104.6KB, pdf)
    S3 Table. Nutritional composition of mice feed.

    (PDF)

    pone.0318827.s005.pdf (25.6KB, pdf)
    S1 File. Raw data.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318827.s006.xlsx (58.2KB, xlsx)
    S2 File. Raw data for ASV analysis.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318827.s007.xlsx (70.1KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_Hayeeawaema et al..docx

    pone.0318827.s008.docx (1,013.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES