Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 29;11:100322. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100322

Table 3.

Association between length of stay in natal village, provider change, and facility visits, among migrators only (N = 995).

aIRR
(95 % CI)
Prenatal facility visits
Postnatal facility visits
Total In marital village In natal village Total In marital village In natal village
length of stay (months) 1.00
(0.97–1.02)
.88⁎⁎
(0.85–0.91)
1.22⁎⁎
(1.17–1.27)
1.02
(0.98–1.06)
.99
(0.88–1.11)
1.02
(0.97–1.07)
provider change .86⁎⁎
(0.78–0.96)
.82⁎⁎
(0.72–0.93)
1.02
(0.84–1.23)
1.41*
(1.06–1.87)
.56
(0.19–1.66)
1.59⁎⁎
(1.20–2.10)
length of stayXprovider change (interaction term) 1.01
(0.97–1.06)
1.02
(0.95–1.09)
1.00
(0.93–1.08)
1.02
(0.94–1.11)
1.15
(0.82–1.61)
1.03
(0.94–1.11)

Significant at alpha <0.05.

⁎⁎

Significant at alpha <0.01

Sample for continuous models with continuous migration exposure only include only migrators (those who stayed in natal village ≥2 weeks during the prenatal or postnatal period, depending on the model outcome.

aOR: adjusted odds ratio.

aIRR: adjusted incidence rate ratio.

Models adjusted for participant age, parity, religion, education, and complications during pregnancy, and for household income and highest household education level.