Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 17;26(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-02020-4

Table 2.

Assessment of certainty of evidence using the GRADE evidence profile

Certainty assessment No of patients Effect Certainty
No of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations endometriosis control Relative
(95% CI)
Absolute
(95% CI)
Migraine
13 Observational studies very seriousa not serious seriousb not serious strong association 2,859/32,489 (8.8%) 12,030/299,166 (4.0%)

OR 2.25

(1.85 to 2.72)

46 more per 1,000

(from 32 more to 62 more)

⨁⨁◯◯

Lowa, b

Migraine without aura
3 Observational studies very seriousc not serious seriousb not serious strong association 137/482 (28.4%)

63/488

(12.9%)

OR 2.64

(1.89 to 3.69)

152 more per 1,000

(from 90 more to 224 more)

⨁◯◯◯

Very lowb, c

Migraine with aura
3 Observational studies very seriousc seriousd seriousb very seriouse limited evidence, heterogeneity of findings

28/482

(5.8%)

8/488

(1.6%)

OR 3.47

(0.53 to 22.89)

37 more per 1,000

(from 7 fewer to 255 more)

⨁◯◯◯

Very lowb, c,d, e

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio

Explanations

a. 50% of studies (n = 7) at very high risk of bias, 21% (n = 3) at high risk of bias, 14.5% of studies (n = 3) rated as ‘some concerns’, and 14.5% (n = 3) at low risk of bias

b. Multiple diagnostic methods accepted, various population settings (e.g. neurology clinic), not all studies excluded endometriosis in the control group (e.g. negative laparoscopy)

c. 67% (n = 2) rated as ‘some concerns’ and 33% (n = 1) at very high risk of bias

d. One study found similar rates in both groups

e. 95% CI 0.53–22.89