Table 3.
Association between severity of tooth loss in 2019 and geriatric syndromes at the 4th-year follow-up in 2023 among 529 participants
| Variables | Non-adjusted OR (95% CI) |
Model 1 OR (95% CI) |
Model 2 OR (95% CI) |
Model 3 OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Severity of tooth loss and sarcopenia | ||||
| No tooth loss or having tooth loss that not affecting life (N = 429) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Having tooth loss that affecting life (N = 100) | 2.29 (1.33, 3.94)* | 1.90 (1.09, 3.33)* | 1.90 (1.08, 3.33)* | 1.80 (1.02, 3.21)* |
| Severity of tooth loss and malnutrition risk | ||||
| No tooth loss or having tooth loss that not affecting life (N = 429) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Having tooth loss that affecting life (N = 100) | 2.41 (1.54, 3.77)** | 2.39 (1.51, 3.78)** | 2.40 (1.52, 3.82)** | 2.31 (1.44, 3.69)** |
| Severity of tooth loss and frailty | ||||
| No tooth loss or having tooth loss that not affecting life (N = 429) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Having tooth loss that affecting life (N = 100) | 1.53 (0.97, 2.40) | 1.30 (0.81, 2.08) | 1.30 (0.81, 2.09) | 1.37 (0.84, 2.23) |
| Severity of tooth loss and fall | ||||
| No tooth loss or having tooth loss that not affecting life (N = 429) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Having tooth loss that affecting life (N = 100) | 1.27 (0.72, 2.22) | 1.11 (0.62, 1.98) | 1.12 (0.62, 2.00) | 1.06 (0.58, 1.94) |
| Severity of tooth loss and total outcome score | ||||
| No tooth loss or having tooth loss that not affecting life (N = 429) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
| Having tooth loss that affecting life (N = 100) | 2.54 (1.53, 4.23)** | 2.33 (1.39, 3.91)* | 2.29 (1.36, 3.86)* | 2.25 (1.33, 3.82)* |
Notes: Model 1 adjusted for age, sex; Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, education; Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, education, drinking, smoking, number of chronic disease
Data in bold indicate statistically significant values: *p < 0.05,**p < 0.001
Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit: all p > 0.05. A p-value > 0.05 indicates that the model fits the data well
CI: confidence interval