Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan;16(1):123–126. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2003.11927893

Table 2.

Comparative clinical trials involving angiotensin II receptor blockers

Study design (ref) Drug, dosage, and number of patients Results
8-week double-blind, randomized, multicenter (CLAIM II) (6) Candesartan 16 mg × 2 weeks, then 32 mg × 6 weeks (307 patients) At 8 weeks, candesartan lowered sitting BP more than losartan (P < 0.05). Response rates were 58.8% for candesartan and 52.1% for losartan*; difference has statistical significance but questionable clinical significance.
Losartan 50 mg × 2 weeks, then 100 mg × 6 weeks (304 patients)
8-week double-blind, randomized, parallel, forced titration (7) Candesartan 8 mg × 4 weeks, then 16 mg × 4 weeks (115 patients) Both candesartan and losartan reduced systolic and diastolic BP when compared with placebo. Differences between candesartan 8 mg and losartan 50 mg were not significant. Candesartan 16 mg lowered systolic BP more effectively than either losartan dose (P < 0.05).
Losartan 50 mg × 4 weeks, then 100 mg × 4 weeks (115 patients)
Placebo (38 patients)
8-week double-blind, randomized, parallel (8) Irbesartan 300 mg (142 patients) Irbesartan 300 mg was superior to both irbesartan 150 mg and losartan 100 mg in lowering sitting diastolic BP (P = 0.05).
Irbesartan 150 mg (142 patients) Irbesartan 150 mg and losartan 100 mg did not differ in response.
Losartan 100 mg (141 patients) Irbesartan was better tolerated than losartan.
Placebo (142 patients)
6-week double-blind, randomized (9) Telmisartan 40 mg (57 patients) Telmisartan 40 mg and 80 mg had significantly greater reductions of ambulatory BP assessment (from baseline) than losartan (P < 0.05). Telmisartan 80 mg had greater reductions in diastolic and systolic BP from baseline than losartan at all evaluation periods.
Telmisartan 80 mg (54 patients)
Losartan 50 mg (57 patients)
4-way, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover; patients received each drug for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week washout (10) Losartan 50 mg (30 patients) Mean 24-hour diastolic BP was significantly lower with valsartan than with losartan or telmisartan (P < 0.001). Heart rate was not affected by any agent.
Telmisartan 40 mg (30 patients)
Valsartan 80 mg (30 patients)
Randomized open-label crossover; patients received drug for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week washout (11) Valsartan 80 mg (40 patients) Mean 24-hour BP, daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP were lower with valsartan (P < 0.01). Trough/peak ratio of BP was significantly greater with valsartan (P< 0.05). (Both agents main-tained antihypertensive effects throughout the 24 hours.)
Losartan 50 mg (40 patients)
8-week randomized, double- Valsartan 80 mg × 4 weeks, then There was no significant difference between the 2 drug treatments.
blind, placebo-controlled (12) 160 mg × 4 weeks (551 patients) Valsartan showed a slightly greater response rate at the end of 8
Losartan 50 mg × 4 weeks, then weeks (P < 0.021).
100 mg × 4 weeks (273 patients)
8-week double-blind, randomized, parallel (13) Olmesartan 20 mg (147 patients) Reduction of sitting diastolic BP with olmesartan was greater than with losartan (P = 0.0002), valsartan (P < 0.0001), or irbesartan (P = 0.0412). Reductions of systolic BP were not significantly different. Reduction in mean 24-hour diastolic and systolic BP with olmesartan was significantly greater than with losartan and valsartan (P = 0.05).
Losartan 50 mg (150 patients)
Valsartan 80 mg (145 patients)
Irbesartan 150 mg (146 patients)
Comparative trial Eprosartan 600 mg (60 patients) Mean change in BP was greater for eprosartan but did not reach statistical significance.
Losartan 50 mg (60 patients)

*Response defined as a decrease in diastolic BP to <90 mm Hg or at least a decrease of 10 mm Hg.

†Ambulatory blood pressure assessed continuously throughout the 18- to 24-hour period after dosing.

†Personal communication, Maryann T. Travaglini, PharmD, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, April 2, 1998.

BP indicates blood pressure.