Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and blood plasma/MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer promising tools to promote longevity and treat age-related diseases. MSCs have low immunogenicity and tumorigenicity, and their efficacy is relatively independent of the donor age in humans (but not in rodents). Systemic administration of MSCs and stem cell/blood-derived EVs modified the omic profiles of various organs of aged rodents towards the young ones. The application of EVs appears to be even more beneficial than MSCs. Remarkably, over 70% of microRNAs, which are over-presented in ESC-derived EVs, were found to target longevity-associated genes. Along with MSCs, other types of stem cells were reported to display health- and lifespan-extending effects. Pluripotent Muse cells, a specific subpopulation of MSCs, which possess a number of unique features, could be particularly relevant for promoting healthspan. The rejuvenation potential of MSCs, EVs, and Muse cells warrants further investigation in both animal models and clinical trials, using aging clocks for biological age determination as one of the endpoints.
Keywords: MSCs, Extracellular vesicles, Stem cells, Aging signatures, Cell therapy, Longevity
Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represent a distinct population of mesenchymal stromal cells, which (i) are able to adhere to plastic surfaces, (ii) express specific cell surface markers (CD73, CD90, and CD105, but not CD14, CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR), (iii) and are able to differentiate into osteogenic, chondrogenic, or adipogenic cell lineages in vitro (Kulus et al. 2021; Galderisi et al. 2022). It should be noted that MSC isolation yields heterogeneous, non-clonal cultures of stromal cells, including stem cells with diverse multipotent potential, committed progenitors, and differentiated cells (Galderisi et al. 2022). MSCs are found in virtually all organs of the adult organism, examined thus far (da Silva Meirelles et al. 2006). A rapidly growing body of evidence indicates the beneficial effects of systemic administration of MSCs or MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in various pathological conditions, including age-related diseases (ARDs) (Guy and Offen 2020; Zhuang et al. 2021; Smolinská et al. 2023; Emmrich et al. 2024; Rudnitsky et al. 2024; Tombak et al. 2025). For example, the systemic administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs or MSC-derived EVs from young rodents increased hippocampal neurogenesis and improved cognitive function in aged animals (Gobshtis et al. 2017, 2021; Yu et al. 2018; Herman et al. 2021; Tfilin et al. 2023).
Longevity is the most general and integrative parameter for evaluating the therapeutic effects of any interventions (Lyu et al. 2024). Another integrative parameter directly related to life expectancy is biological age. Recently, its determination has become possible, using various biological aging clocks (Moqri et al. 2025; Muradian and Fraifeld 2024a). However, to date, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of MSCs/MSC-derived EVs on longevity, biological age, and aging phenotypes has not been conducted. With this in mind, in this review, we primarily focus on the effects of MSC or EV administration on the lifespan of wild-type or progeroid animals. Other types of stem cells and EV sources were also considered. Along with the health- and lifespan-extending effects, we discuss their putative mechanisms as well as the impact on biological age and aging omic signatures.
The effects of stem cell/MSC/EV administration on lifespan in rodents
The effects of systemic administration of stem cells/MSCs/EVs on lifespan in rodents are summarized in Table 1. These effects were investigated in both naturally aging rodents and progeroid mice. The MSCs or EVs were delivered systemically (i.p., i.v., or into the left ventricular cavity of the heart), and the frequency of their administration varied from a single injection to weekly injections until natural death. The transplantation of MSCs or infusion of EVs led to a consistent extension of both median (or mean) and maximum lifespan in rodents. This was observed in both naturally aging and progeroid animals. Moreover, in the vast majority of studies, the lifespan-extending effects were accompanied by attenuation of aging symptoms, including preservation of physical activity, cognitive function, and metabolism (a decrease in insulin resistance and maintenance of bone mineral density) (Table 1).
Table 1.
The effects of systemic administration of MSCs or blood-extracted EVs on lifespan in rodents
| Origin of stem cells or EVs | Regimen of treatment | Animals (sex/#/age at the beginning of treatment) | Aging model | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone marrow-derived MSCs from 1–2-month-old male C57BL/6 J mice | 106 MSCs i.v. per mouse, single injection |
Balb/C mice ♀ n = 7 per group 18–24 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median (by 15%) and maximum (by 6%) lifespan Preservation of bone mineral density |
Shen et al. (2011) |
| Human amniotic membrane-derived MSCs (data on donors is not indicated) | 106 MSCs i.v. per rat, multiple injections once a month till natural death |
F344 rats ♀ n = 20–30 per group 10 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median (by 32%) and maximum (by 33%) lifespan Maintenance of physical activity and cognitive function |
Kim et al. (2015) |
| Human adipose tissue-derived MSCs from one healthy 53-year-old female donor | 106 MSCs i.v. per rat, multiple injections once a month till natural death |
F344 rats ♀ n = 20–30 per group 10 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median (by 32%) and maximum (by 48%) lifespan Maintenance of physical activity and cognitive function |
Kim et al. (2015) |
| Human bone marrow-derived MSCs one healthy 56-year-old female donor | 5 × 106 MSCs i.v. per rat, multiple injections every two weeks till natural death |
Sprague Dawley rat ♀ n = 1 6 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of lifespan (by 38%) Maintenance of physical activity Absence of mammary tumors |
Mansilla et al. (2016) |
| Human adipose tissue-derived MSCs (data on donors is not indicated) | Lysate from 105 MSCs i.p. per kg of body weight, multiple injections three times per week till natural death |
Sprague Dawley rats ♂ and ♀ n = 22–24 per group 12 months |
Natural aging |
Slight shortening average lifespan (by 8%) Decrease in body weight, bone and fat mass |
Hsu et al. (2018) |
| Muscle-derived stem/progenitor cells from 14–21-day-old male f1 C57BL/6:FVB/n or C57BL/10 J mice | 2–4 × 105 MSCs i.p. per g body weight, single injection |
Ercc1−/− mice ♀ n = 8 per group 17 days |
Progeria (Ercc1−/− mice) | Extension of median (by 314%) and maximum (by 236%) lifespan (Ercc1−/− mice) | Lavasani et al. (2012) |
| Muscle-derived stem/progenitor cells from 14–21-day-old male f1 C57BL/6:FVB/n or C57BL/10 J mice | 2–4 × 105 MSCs i.p. per g body weight, two injections during 6 weeks (Ercc1 −/△ mice) |
Ercc1−/△ mice ♀ n = 8 per group 6–7 weeks |
Progeria (Ercc1−/△ mice) |
Delay of the onset of aging symptoms (dystonia, trembling, kyphosis, ataxia, muscle wasting, loss of vision, urinary incontinence and decreased spontaneous activity) Survival data are not available |
Lavasani et al. (2012) |
| Amniotic membrane-derived MSCs from C57BL/6 J mice in the middle and late phases of normal pregnancy | 107 MSCs i.p. per mouse, four injections once a week for 4 weeks |
Bmi-1−/− mice n = 6 per group 2 days |
Progeria (Bmi-1−/− mice) |
Extension of median (by 236%) and maximum (by 173%) lifespan Increase in body weight and overall size of the body, thymus, spleen and kidney Partial preservation of thymic function Amelioration of premature osteoporosis |
Xie et al. (2015) |
| Bone marrow-derived MSCs exposed to oxidative stress (20% O2 for 48 h) from 3–20-week-old C57/Bl6J mice | 106 MSCs i.p. per mouse, single injection |
Ercc1−/− mice n ≥ 4 per group 10 days |
Progeria (Ercc1−/− mice) | Extension of median (by 286%) lifespan | Dorronsoro et al. (2021) |
| EVs from blood plasma of 4–12-month-old female C57BL/6 J mice | 100 μl of EVs from 200 μl blood plasma i.p., multiple injections once per week till natural death |
C57BL/6 J mice ♀ n = 11–12 per group 26 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median (by 10%) and maximum (by 16%) lifespan Maintenance of physical activity |
Yoshida et al. (2019) |
| EVs from blood plasma of 2-month-old male C57BL/6 J mice | 360 μg EV protein i.v. per mouse, multiple injections once a week till natural death |
C57BL/6 J mice ♂ n = 5 per group 20 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median (by 12%) and maximum (by 21%) lifespan Alleviation of frailty Maintenance of endurance, physical activity, and cognitive function Preservation of fertility and litter size |
Chen et al. (2024) |
| EVs obtained from cardiosphere-derived cells from neonatal (2-day-old) F344 rats | Injections into the left ventricular cavity: the first injection with an initial dose of 1.3 × 108 EVs per g of body weight was followed by four injections with dose of 2.6 × 107 EVs per g of body weight once a month for 4 months |
F344 rats ♂ and ♀ n = 13–14 per group 22 months |
Natural aging |
Extension of median lifespan (by ~ 60%) Decrease in insulin resistance Attenuation of tissue fibrosis in heart, lungs, skeletal muscle and kidney |
Grigorian Shamagian et al. (2023) |
In general, these effects were not significantly influenced by the source of MSCs (bone marrow, adipose tissue, amniotic membranes, etc.). However, the comparative analysis conducted by Kim et al. (2015) revealed that adipose tissue-derived MSCs were more efficient in extending the lifespan, whereas MSCs from amniotic membranes were better at maintaining physical activity and cognitive function (Kim et al. 2015). This could be attributed to the observation that MSCs from different tissues exhibit slightly different properties. In particular, Heo et al. (2016) demonstrated that, compared to placenta- or umbilical cord-derived MSCs, the bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived MSCs possess higher capacity for self-renewal and the potential to differentiate into other mesodermal cell lineages (adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondroblasts), as well as more pronounced anti-inflammatory activity.
The lifespan-extending effect was also observed for EVs extracted from cardiospheres or blood plasma (Table 1), and this effect was comparable to that of MSC transplantation. It is worth noting that defining the cell source of EVs isolated from blood plasma is difficult. However, based on the study of adipose tissue-specific Nampt knockout mice, it was suggested that adipose tissue is a valuable contributor (Yoshida et al. 2019). The important point is that extracellular Nampt, which promotes NAD+ generation, is contained exclusively in EVs, originating presumably from adipose tissue (Yoshida et al. 2019). It appears that the lifespan-extending effect of blood plasma-derived EVs is primarily associated with modulation of NAD+ levels. Indeed, the age-related decline of NAD+ was ubiquitously observed, and its prevention was shown to extend the lifespan of both invertebrate (yeast, worms, flies) and vertebrate (rodents) organisms (Yaku et al. 2018).
Lifespan-extending effects of MSCs as well as EVs do not seem to be sex-, strain-, or even species-specific, but could be dependent on donor age (Table 1). Indeed, stem cells from young mice extended median lifespan in both naturally aging and progeroid mice. In contrast, MSCs from old or progeroid mice did not exert any significant effect on lifespan (Shen et al. 2011; Lavasani et al. 2012; Dorronsoro et al. 2021). This may be attributed to age-related alterations of MSC function in rodents (Kasper et al. 2009). Notably, the lifespan-extending effect was also observed in the case of MSC transplantation from middle-aged human donors to rats (Kim et al. 2015; Mansilla et al. 2016). No significant difference in ‘cellular fitness’ in vitro between bone marrow-derived MSCs from very young (infants and children < 6 years) and middle-aged (38–58 years) human donors was observed, except for a slightly lower rate of cell division in older vs. young donors (Lund et al. 2010). Similar results were reported by Liu et al. (2014) for MSCs from human donors above 60 years of age. Transplantation of these MSCs exhibited cardioprotective effects in the myocardial infarction rat model.
Another important issue is whether the efficacy of stem cell or EV therapy depends on the age of recipients. Of note, in all studies carried out thus far, the recipient animals were of relatively advanced ages. In mice, the treatment was started in animals of 18 months of age or older. In rats, the treatment was started no earlier than 12 months of age when animals are considered ‘middle-aged’ (Campos-Beltrán and Marshall 2021), and was conducted for 4 months or until natural death (Table 1). It would be attractive to speculate that the age of a recipient is not a barrier for beneficial effects of stem cell/MSC/EV therapy.
To summarize, systemic stem cell/MSC/EV administration exerted a clear lifespan-extending effect, and this effect was observed even if the treatment was started late in life. It seems that the tissue source of MSCs had only a slight impact on lifespan. Donor age was of critical value in rodents but not in humans. Not surprisingly, the longevity-promoting effect of MSC transplantation was much more pronounced in progeroid mice than in wild-type animals.
Effects of stem cells/MSCs/EVs on aging signatures
Thus far, only a few studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of systemic administration of stem cells/MSCs/EVs on biological age or age-related omic profiles. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two papers in which aging epigenetic clocks were used to evaluate such effects (Sanz-Ros et al. 2022; Horvath et al. 2024). In both studies, EVs derived from either MSCs or blood plasma were used, and impressive results were obtained. Sanz-Ros et al. (2022) found that proteins extracted from MSC-derived exosomes of young mice decreased epigenetic age, prevented frailty, and improved healthspan in old mice. Horvath et al. (2024) transplanted the exosome fraction of swine blood plasma to old rats, resulting in a significant reversal of biological age and functional improvement of various organs.
In several studies, various age-related omic profiles (transcriptomic, metabolomic, proteomic, peptidomic, phosphoproteomic profiles, as well as gut microbiota) were evaluated after systemic stem cell/MSC/EV administration (Table 2). As a result, the omic profiles of various organs of aged rodents were modified, so that the profiles were comparable to those of younger animals. Indeed, the rejuvenative effects in liver, heart, brain, kidney, gut, and blood were observed (Fig. 1). In monkeys, transplantation of human ESC-derived MSC-like cells extended the reproductive lifespan (Yan et al. 2024). The rejuvenative effects of stem cells/MSCs/EVs do not seem to be species-specific (Table 2), similarly to the lifespan-extending experiments.
Table 2.
The effects of systemic administration of MSCs or EVs on age-related changes in omics profiles
| Stem cell or EV origin | Regimen of treatment | Animals (#/sex/age at the beginning of treatment) | Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiosphere-derived cells from neonatal (2-day-old) Sprague Dawley rats |
106 cells per rat, into the left ventricular cavity or intramyocardially, single injection Follow-up period: 1 month |
F344 rats n = 5–7 per group 21.8 ± 1.6 months |
Transcriptomic profile of whole-heart extracts of cell-treated aged rats recapitulated transcriptomic profile of young rats | Grigorian Shamagian et al. (2017) |
| Human placenta-derived MSCs (data on donors is not indicated) |
5 × 105 MSCs i.v. per rat, three injections at 10-day intervals or 4-week intervals Follow-up period from the first injection: 2 months |
Sprague Dawley rats ♀ n = 24 per group 52–54 weeks |
Amelioration of aging-associated phenotype of metabolome of serum and liver | Kim and Lee (2022) |
| Adipose tissue-derived MSCs from 3–6-month-old C57BL/6 J mice |
20 µg of EV protein i.v. per mouse, two injections, once a week Follow-up period from the first injection: 4 months |
C57BL/6 J mice ♂ and ♀ n = 6 per group 20 months |
Epigenetic age of EV-treated aged mice was lower in liver and kidney and did not differ in muscle and spleen compared to control aged mice Plasma metabolome of EV-treated aged mice recapitulated plasma metabolome of young mice |
Sanz-Ros et al. (2022) |
| Human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (data on donors is not indicated) |
109 EVs i.v. per mouse, eight injections once a week Follow-up period from the first injection: 4 months |
C57BL/6 J mice ♂ n = 6 per group 18 months |
Amelioration of aging-associated phenotype of metabolome and phosphoproteome in liver | Ling et al. (2023) |
| Human bone marrow-derived MSCs from healthy young adult donors |
106 MSCs i.v. per mouse, single injection Follow-up period: 5 days |
C57BL/6 J mice ♀ 24 months |
Serum proteomic and peptidomic profiles of MSC-treated aged mice were less proinflammatory than serum proteomic and peptidomic profiles of untreated mice | Niu et al. (2023) |
| Human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (data on donors is not indicated) |
5 × 106 MSCs i.v. per rat, four injections once a week Follow-up period from the first injection: 5 weeks |
Sprague Dawley rats ♂ n = 5 per group 24 months |
Gut microbiota profile of MSC-treated aged rats recapitulated gut microbiota profile of young rats | Wang et al. (2023) |
| Human exfoliated deciduous teeth-derived stem cells from healthy 5–11-year-old donors |
5 × 105 i.v. cells per mouse, 12 injections once in two weeks Follow-up period from the first injection: 6 months |
C57BL/6 J mice ♀ n = 15 per group 24 months |
Transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of liver in stem cell-treated aged mice recapitulated transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of young mice | Xing et al. (2023) |
| Mouse ESC line D3 |
100 µg EVs i.p. per mouse, multiple injections every alternate day for 8 weeks Follow-up period from the first injection: 2 months |
C57BL/6 J mice ♂ n = 3 per group 14 months |
Transcriptomic profile of peripheral blood monocytes of EV-treated aged mice recapitulated transcriptomic profile of young mice | Yu et al. (2023) |
| The exosome fraction (E5) of platelet-free blood plasma from 6-month-old pigs |
1.43 g of solid precipitate of exosomes per 500 g body weight; two series of four i.v. injections every alternate day for 8 days: first started at day 1, second started at day 95 Follow-up period from the first injection: 5 months |
Sprague Dawley rats ♂ n = 18 per group 24 months |
Progressive improvement in organ functions: a decrease in blood bilirubin, glucose, creatinine, cholesterol, pro-inflammatory cytokines to the levels of young animals Improvement of cognitive functions Reversal of biological age according to six different epigenetic clocks |
Horvath et al. (2024) |
| Human ESC-derived MSC-like cells |
5 × 106 cells per ovary, two injections once a month Follow-up period from the first injection: 26 months |
Cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) ♀ n = 10 (3 control, 7 treated) 18–23 years |
Mitigation of inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative damage, and apoptosis in perimenopausal ovaries Elevated secretion of sex hormones in perimenopausal ovaries |
Yan et al. (2024) |
Fig. 1.
The effects of stem cell/MSC/EV systemic administration on aging signatures in various organs of rodents
All in all, the “younger” state of various organs in stem cell/MSC/EV-treated aged animals may, to some extent, explain the lifespan-extending effects of such a therapy.
Putative longevity-promoting mechanisms of stem cell/MSC/EV treatment
The accumulated body of evidence indicates that the transplanted MSCs could exert their beneficial effects on longevity and health by their secretome which includes soluble molecules and EVs (Siraj et al. 2023). In particular, the secretome of non-senescent MSCs revealed anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties. Whatever the case, the transplanted MSCs display their effects in a paracrine manner rather than by differentiating into other cell types (Boregowda and Phinney 2013; Francisco et al. 2019; Govindasamy et al. 2021). The comparable effects of MSCs and MSC-derived EVs strongly support this concept. Relevant issues are discussed in detail in the recent review by Li et al. (2023). Yet, EVs have some advantages over MSCs: EVs are much less immunogenic and fully non-tumorigenic (Tolar et al. 2007; Ali et al. 2024; Hye et al. 2024).
A prominent exception to the predominant paracrine mode of action of MSCs is their subpopulation denoted as Muse cells (multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring stem cells) (Kuroda et al. 2010). In contrast to other adult somatic stem cells, transplanted Muse cells successfully differentiate into various cell types (Kushida et al. 2018) and selectively home to damaged sites after systemic administration (Minatoguchi et al. 2024). Their beneficial therapeutic effects were shown in several models of ARDs (Alanazi et al. 2023; Velasco et al. 2023; Minatoguchi et al. 2024).
Considering the multiplicity of MSC secretome components, it would be reasonable to suggest multiple targets and pathways of MSC effects. Among various types of EV cargos, microRNAs (miRs) are of particular interest. In longevity-related studies, the miR content of EVs was explored by Yu et al. (2023) and Chen et al. (2024). Yu et al. (2023) evaluated the miRNA landscape of EVs derived from ESCs compared to EVs derived from embryonic fibroblasts. Based on their results, we noticed that over 70% of miRs, which are over-presented in ESC-derived EVs, were found to target longevity-associated genes (LAGs; Tacutu et al. 2018; https://genomics.senescence.info/genes/index.html). Furthermore, we conducted the KEGG analysis which showed that LAGs targeted by the top 20 over-represented miRs, are primarily involved in well-recognized longevity pathways such as FoxO signaling pathway, Insulin resistance, Cellular senescence, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, Autophagy, Pathways in cancer, Cell cycle, and Apoptosis. Of note, 9 of top 20 over-represented miRs together with their target genes form the continuous miR-regulated protein–protein interaction (PPI) network which includes 19 well-known LAGs (Fig. 2). Moreover, miRs which are differentially represented in ESC-derived EVs, are involved in regulation of all conditions recognized as hallmarks of aging (López-Otín et al. 2013, 2023; Harries 2014). In particular, numerous studies showed the inhibitory effect of EVs on cellular senescence (reviewed by Rudnitsky et al. 2024). In addition to targeting the LAGs, the aforementioned miRs could promote longevity by still unknown mechanisms. For example, miR-708 which, according to the miRPath database (Kehl et al. 2020; https://mpd.bioinf.uni-sb.de/overview.html), does not yet have experimentally validated targets, has been shown to be associated with a longer lifespan in mice (Lee et al. 2017). Consistent with the effects of EVs, administration of murine stem cells extended lifespan in mice, whereas primary embryonic fibroblasts did not display such an effect (Lavasani et al. 2012; Table 1).
Fig. 2.
MicroRNA-regulated PPI network (see the text for explanations)
In another work, the miR content of EVs extracted from blood plasma of young and old animals was compared (Chen et al. 2024). The authors identified three miRs that were over-represented in EVs from the plasma of young animals: miR-144-3p, miR-149-5p, and miR-455–3p. Our analysis showed that all of them target LAGs (APP, TAU/MAPT, and CRTC1) with anti-longevity action. Accordingly, miR-induced silencing of these genes might have a longevity-promoting effect. It seems plausible that the lifespan-extending effect of EVs from “young” plasma is, in part, attributed to the high levels of aforementioned miRs. It would be attractive to speculate that MSCs from various tissues (Yoshida et al. 2019) were a valuable source of the plasma-derived EVs.
Concluding remarks and perspectives
MSCs and MSC-derived EVs hold promise for promoting longevity. Notably, MSCs have relatively low immunogenicity and tumorigenicity and their efficacy is only slightly influenced by donor age in case of humans (in contrast to rodents). Yet, while evaluating the effects of MSC transplantation, the possibility of MSCs to undergo cellular senescence should be taken into consideration (Alessio et al. 2023; Siraj et al. 2023). Along with MSCs, other types of stem cells were reported to display health- and lifespan-extending effects in rodents (Lavasani et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2023). It is also true with regard to EVs derived from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or extracted from blood plasma (Yoshida et al. 2019; Yu et al. 2023). The application of EVs appears to be even more beneficial than stem cell therapy. Of note, the safeness of MSC/EV transplantation in humans was shown in numerous clinical trials, including ARDs (Strauer et al. 2010; Rodríguez-Fuentes et al. 2021; Koda et al. 2024). However, to date, the longevity-promoting effects of MSC/EV therapy have been limited to rodent studies. Direct extrapolation of rodent data to humans is thus far mostly speculative. Indeed, the aging phenotype could significantly differ across the species, mammals included (Rattan 2024). Therefore, the evaluation of MSC/EV therapeutic potential warrants further thorough investigation and is an important point for future longitudinal studies in humans.
Pluripotent Muse cells could be particularly relevant for promoting healthspan (Dezawa 2018). Yet, the age-related aspects of Muse cell biology have not been fully addressed. An important point for future investigations would be the evaluation of the rejuvenation potential of Muse cells, with the application of aging clocks for biological age determination (Muradian and Fraifeld 2024a, b).
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the assistance of Boris Rudnitsky in the preparation of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ARDs
Age-related diseases
- ESC
Embryonic stem cell
- EVs
Extracellular vesicles
- i.p.
Intraperitoneally
- i.v.
Intravenously
- LAGs
Longevity-associated genes
- MiRs
MicroRNAs
- MSCs
Mesenchymal stem cells
Author contribution
V.E.F. conceived the original idea of the manuscript. E.R. and V.E.F. wrote the main manuscript text and tables. E.R. prepared the figures. All authors provided critical feedback and contributed to the final manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Ben-Gurion University. This work was supported by the United States-Israel Research Foundation (BSF; grant number 2021287 to G.T., V.E.F. and V.G.). K.K.M. was awarded by Emergency Fellowships for Ukrainian researchers from The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. E.R. was partially supported by the Israel Ministry of Aliyah and Integration.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The article does not involve human participants and/or animals.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Alanazi RF, Alhwity BS, Almahlawi RM, Alatawi BD, Albalawi SA, Albalawi RA, Albalawi AA, Abdel-Maksoud MS, Elsherbiny N (2023) Multilineage differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells: a new era of stem cell-based therapy. Cells 12:1676. 10.3390/cells12131676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alessio N, Acar MB, Squillaro T, Aprile D, Ayaz-Güner Ş, Di Bernardo G, Peluso G, Özcan S, Galderisi U (2023) Progression of irradiated mesenchymal stromal cells from early to late senescence: changes in SASP composition and anti-tumour properties. Cell Prolif 56:e13401. 10.1111/cpr.13401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali T, Conzatti G, Toti F, Anton N, Vandamme T (2024) Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as cell-free nanotherapeutics and nanocarriers. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 10.1016/j.nano.2024.102769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boregowda SV, Phinney DG (2013) MSCs: Paracrine effects. In: Hematti P, Keating A (eds) Mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Humana Press, New York, pp 145–167. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5711-4_9 [Google Scholar]
- Campos-Beltrán D, Marshall L (2021) Changes in sleep EEG with aging in humans and rodents. Pflugers Arch 473:841–851. 10.1007/s00424-021-02545-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X, Luo Y, Zhu Q, Zhang J, Huang H, Kan Y, Li D, Xu M, Liu S, Li J, Pan J, Zhang L, Guo Y, Wang B, Qi G, Zhou Z, Zhang CY, Fang L, Wang Y, Chen X (2024) Small extracellular vesicles from young plasma reverse age-related functional declines by improving mitochondrial energy metabolism. Nat Aging 4:834–838. 10.1038/s43587-024-00612-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva ML, Chagastelles PC, Nardi NB (2006) Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J Cell Sci 119:2204–2213. 10.1242/jcs.02932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dezawa M (ed) (2018) Muse cells: endogenous reparative pluripotent stem cells. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 1103. Springer, Tokyo. 10.1007/978-4-431-56847-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dorronsoro A, Santiago FE, Grassi D, Zhang T, Lai RC, McGowan SJ, Angelini L, Lavasani M, Corbo L, Lu A, Brooks RW, Garcia-Contreras M, Stolz DB, Amelio A, Boregowda SV, Fallahi M, Reich A, Ricordi C, Phinney DG, Huard J, Lim SK, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD (2021) Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles reduce senescence and extend health span in mouse models of aging. Aging Cell 20:e13337. 10.1111/acel.13337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emmrich S, Trapp A, Ganguly A, Biashad A, Ablaeva Y, Drage M, Takasugi M, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V (2024) Characterization of naked mole-rat mesenchymal stromal cells: comparison with long- and short-lived mammals. Aging Biol 2:20240029. 10.59368/agingbio.20240029 [Google Scholar]
- Francisco J, Vizoso N, Eiro L, Costa P, Esparza M, Landin P, Diaz-Rodriguez P, Schneider J, Perez-Fernandez R (2019) Mesenchymal stem cells in homeostasis and systemic diseases: hypothesis, evidences, and therapeutic opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 20:3738. 10.3390/IJMS20153738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galderisi U, Peluso G, Di Bernardo G (2022) Clinical trials based on mesenchymal stromal cells are exponentially increasing: where are we in recent years? Stem Cell Rev Rep 18:23–36. 10.1007/s12015-021-10231-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gobshtis N, Tfilin M, Wolfson M, Fraifeld VE, Turgeman G (2017) Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells reverses behavioural deficits and impaired neurogenesis caused by prenatal exposure to valproic acid. Oncotarget 8:17443–17452. 10.18632/oncotarget.15245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gobshtis N, Tfilin M, Fraifeld VE, Turgeman G (2021) Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells causes long-term alleviation of schizophrenia-like behaviour coupled with increased neurogenesis. Mol Psychiatry 26:4448–4463. 10.1038/s41380-019-0623-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govindasamy V, Rajendran A, Lee ZX, Ooi GC, Then KY, Then KL, Gayathri M, Kumar Das A, Cheong SK (2021) The potential role of mesenchymal stem cells in modulating antiaging process. Cell Biol Int 45:1999–2016. 10.1002/cbin.11652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grigorian Shamagian L, Liu W, Fereydooni S, Middleton RC, Valle J, Cho JH, Marbán E (2017) Cardiac and systemic rejuvenation after cardiosphere-derived cell therapy in senescent rats. Eur Heart J 38:2957–2967. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grigorian Shamagian L, Rogers RG, Luther K, Angert D, Echavez A, Liu W, Middleton R, Antes T, Valle J, Fourier M, Sanchez L, Jaghatspanyan E, Mariscal J, Zhang R, Marbán E (2023) Rejuvenating effects of young extracellular vesicles in aged rats and in cellular models of human senescence. Sci Rep 13:12240. 10.1038/s41598-023-39370-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guy R, Offen D (2020) Promising opportunities for treating neurodegenerative diseases with mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Biomolecules 10:1320. 10.3390/biom10091320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harries LW (2014) MicroRNAs as mediators of the ageing process. Genes (Basel) 5:656–670. 10.3390/genes5030656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heo JS, Choi Y, Kim HS, Kim HO (2016) Comparison of molecular profiles of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta and adipose tissue. Int J Mol Med 37:115–125. 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herman S, Fishel I, Offen D (2021) Intranasal delivery of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for the treatment of neurological diseases. Stem Cells 39:1589–1600. 10.1002/stem.3456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horvath S, Singh K, Raj K, Khairnar SI, Sanghavi A, Shrivastava A, Zoller JA, Li CZ, Herenu CB, Canatelli-Mallat M, Lehmann M, Habazin S, Novokmet M, Vučković F, Solberg Woods LC, Martinez AG, Wang T, Chiavellini P, Levine AJ, Chen H, Brooke RT, Gordevicius J, Lauc G, Goya RG, Katcher HL (2024) Reversal of biological age in multiple rat organs by young porcine plasma fraction. Geroscience 46:367–394. 10.1007/s11357-023-00980-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu MF, Yu SH, Chuang SJ, Kuo TK, Singal PK, Huang CY, Kao CL, Kuo CH (2018) Can mesenchymal stem cell lysate reverse aging? Aging (Albany NY) 10:2900–2910. 10.18632/aging.101595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hye LJ, Jung Y, Seo JH, Bae Y, Kim HS, Jeong W (2024) Roles of extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells in regeneration. Mol Cells. 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasper G, Mao L, Geissler S, Draycheva A, Trippens J, Kühnisch J, Tschirschmann M, Kaspar K, Perka C, Duda GN, Klose J (2009) Insights into mesenchymal stem cell aging: Involvement of antioxidant defense and actin cytoskeleton. Stem Cells 27:1288–1297. 10.1002/stem.49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kehl T, Kern F, Backes C, Fehlmann T, Stöckel D, Meese E, Lenhof HP, Keller A (2020) miRPathDB 2.0: a novel release of the miRNA pathway dictionary database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D142–D147. 10.1093/nar/gkz1022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim KH, Lee KA (2022) Metabolic rewiring by human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy promotes rejuvenation in aged female rats. Int J Mol Sci 23:566. 10.3390/ijms23010566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim D, Kyung J, Park D, Choi EK, Kim KS, Shin K, Lee H, Shin IS, Kang SK, Ra JC, Kim YB (2015) Health span-extending activity of human amniotic membrane- and adipose tissue-derived stem cells in F344 rats. Stem Cells Transl Med 4:1144–1154. 10.5966/sctm.2015-0011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koda M, Imagama S, Nakashima H, Ito S, Segi N, Ouchida J, Suda K, Harmon Matsumoto S, Komatsu M, Endo T, Suzuki S, Inami S, Ueda H, Miyagi M, Inoue G, Takaso M, Nagata K, Yamada H, Kamei N, Nakamae T, Suzuki H, Nishida N, Funaba M, Kumagai G, Furuya T, Yamato Y, Funayama T, Takahashi H, Yamazaki M (2024) Safety and feasibility of intravenous administration of a single dose of allogenic-Muse cells to treat human cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: a clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther 15:259. 10.1186/s13287-024-03842-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulus M, Sibiak R, Stefańska K, Zdun M, Wieczorkiewicz M, Piotrowska-Kempisty H, Jaśkowski JM, Bukowska D, Ratajczak K, Zabel M, Mozdziak P, Kempisty B (2021) Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells derived from human and animal perinatal tissues-origins, characteristics, signaling pathways, and clinical trials. Cells 10:3278. 10.3390/cells10123278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuroda Y, Kitada M, Wakao S, Nishikawa K, Tanimura Y, Makinoshima H, Goda M, Akashi H, Inutsuka A, Niwa A, Shigemoto T, Nabeshima Y, Nakahata T, Nabeshima Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Dezawa M (2010) Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8639–8643. 10.1073/pnas.0911647107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kushida Y, Wakao S, Dezawa M (2018) Muse cells are endogenous reparative stem cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 1103:43–68. 10.1007/978-4-431-56847-6_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavasani M, Robinson AR, Lu A, Song M, Feduska JM, Ahani B, Tilstra JS, Feldman CH, Robbins PD, Niedernhofer LJ, Huard J (2012) Muscle-derived stem/progenitor cell dysfunction limits healthspan and lifespan in a murine progeria model. Nat Commun 3:608. 10.1038/ncomms1611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee BP, Burić I, George-Pandeth A, Flurkey K, Harrison DE, Yuan R, Peters LL, Kuchel GA, Melzer D, Harries LW (2017) MicroRNAs miR-203-3p, miR-664-3p and miR-708-5p are associated with median strain lifespan in mice. Sci Rep 7:44620. 10.1038/srep44620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J, Huang Y, Sun H, Yang L (2023) Mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes in the treatment of age-related diseases. Front Immunol 14:1181308. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1181308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling M, Tang C, Yang X, Yu N, Song Y, Ding W, Sun Y, Yan R, Wang S, Li X, Gao H, Zhang Z, Xing Y (2023) Integrated metabolomics and phosphoproteomics reveal the protective role of exosomes from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in naturally aging mouse livers. Exp Cell Res 427:113566. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, Liu T, Han J, Yang Z, Xue X, Jiang H, Wang H (2014) Advanced age impairs cardioprotective function of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation from patients to myocardially infarcted rats. Cardiology 128:209–219. 10.1159/000360393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2013) The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153:1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2023) Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell 186:243–278. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lund TC, Kobs A, Blazar BR, Tolar J (2010) Mesenchymal stromal cells from donors varying widely in age are of equal cellular fitness after in vitro expansion under hypoxic conditions. Cytotherapy 12:971–981. 10.3109/14653249.2010.509394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu YX, Fu Q, Wilczok D, Ying K, King A, Antebi A et al (2024) Longevity biotechnology: bridging AI, biomarkers, geroscience and clinical applications for healthy longevity. Aging (Albany NY) 16:12955–12976. 10.18632/aging.206135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mansilla E, Roque G, Sosa YE, Tarditti A, Goya RG (2016) A rat treated with mesenchymal stem cells lives to 44 months of age. Rejuvenation Res 19:318–321. 10.1089/rej.2015.1777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minatoguchi S, Fujita Y, Niizuma K, Tominaga T, Yamashita T, Abe K, Dezawa M (2024) Donor Muse cell treatment without HLA-matching tests and immunosuppressant treatment. Stem Cells Transl Med 13:532–545. 10.1093/stcltm/szae018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moqri M, Poganik JR, Horvath S, Gladyshev VN (2025) What makes biological age epigenetic clocks tick. Nat Aging. 10.1038/s43587-025-00833-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muradian KK, Fraifeld VE (2024a) Biological age can be moved in both directions. In: Rejuvenation and longevity. Healthy ageing and longevity, vol 20 (Serial Ed. Suresh I.S. Rattan). Springer, Cham, pp 97–110. 10.1007/978-3-031-64995-0_11
- Muradian KK, Fraifeld VE (2024b) Muse cells and VSEL stem cells in longevity and rejuvenation. In: Rejuvenation and Longevity. Healthy Ageing and Longevity, vol 20 (Serial Ed. Suresh I.S. Rattan). Springer, Cham, pp 77–87. 10.1007/978-3-031-64995-0_9
- Niu H, Wang BY, Wei XY, Wang YN, Zhu WH, Li WJ, Zhang Y, Wang JC (2023) Anti-inflammatory therapeutic biomarkers identified of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell therapy on aging mice by serum proteomics and peptidomics study. J Proteomics 288:104979. 10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rattan SIS (2024) Seven knowledge gaps in modern biogerontology. Biogerontology 25:1–8. 10.1007/s10522-023-10089-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Fuentes DE, Fernández-Garza LE, Samia-Meza JA, Barrera-Barrera SA, Caplan AI, Barrera-Saldaña HA (2021) Mesenchymal stem cells current clinical applications: a systematic review. Arch Med Res 52:93–101. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rudnitsky E, Braiman A, Wolfson M, Muradian KK, Gorbunova V, Turgeman G, Fraifeld VE (2024) Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as senotherapeutics. Ageing Res Rev 99:102391. 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanz-Ros J, Romero-García N, Mas-Bargues C, Monleón D, Gordevicius J, Brooke RT, Dromant M, Díaz A, Derevyanko A, Guío-Carrión A, Román-Domínguez A, Inglés M, Blasco MA, Horvath S, Viña J, Borrás C (2022) Small extracellular vesicles from young adipose-derived stem cells prevent frailty, improve health span, and decrease epigenetic age in old mice. Sci Adv 8:eabq2226. 10.1126/sciadv.abq2226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J, Tsai YT, Dimarco NM, Long MA, Sun X, Tang L (2011) Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells from young donors delays aging in mice. Sci Rep 1:67. 10.1038/srep00067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siraj Y, Galderisi U, Alessio N (2023) Senescence induces fundamental changes in the secretome of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs): implications for the therapeutic use of MSCs and their derivates. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1148761. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1148761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smolinská V, Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ (2023) Current status of the applications of conditioned media derived from mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Physiol Res 72:S233–S245. 10.33549/physiolres.935186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strauer BE, Yousef M, Schannwell CM (2010) The acute and long-term effects of intracoronary Stem cell Transplantation in 191 patients with chronic heARt failure: the STAR-heart study. Eur J Heart Fail 12:721–729. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tacutu R, Thornton D, Johnson E, Budovsky A, Barardo D, Craig T, Diana E, Lehmann G, Toren D, Wang J, Fraifeld VE, de Magalhães JP (2018) Human ageing genomic resources: New and updated databases. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D1083–D1090. 10.1093/nar/gkx1042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tfilin M, Gobshtis N, Fozailoff D, Fraifeld VE, Turgeman G (2023) Polarized anti-inflammatory mesenchymal stem cells increase hippocampal neurogenesis and improve cognitive function in aged mice. Int J Mol Sci 24:4490. 10.3390/ijms24054490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolar J, Nauta AJ, Osborn MJ, Panoskaltsis Mortari A, McElmurry RT, Bell S, Xia L, Zhou N, Riddle M, Schroeder TM, Westendorf JJ, McIvor RS, Hogendoorn PC, Szuhai K, Oseth L, Hirsch B, Yant SR, Kay MA, Peister A, Prockop DJ, Fibbe WE, Blazar BR (2007) Sarcoma derived from cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25:371–379. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tombak M, Knyazer A, Rudnitsky E, Braiman A, Gershoni-Yahalom O, Rosental B, Segev Y, Wolfson M, Muradian KK, Gorbunova V, Turgeman G, Fraifeld VE (2025) The Interplay between cellular senescence and side population stem cells. AgingBio 3:e20250039. 10.59368/agingbio.20250039 [Google Scholar]
- Velasco MG, Satué K, Chicharro D, Martins E, Torres-Torrillas M, Peláez P, Miguel-Pastor L, Del Romero A, Damiá E, Cuervo B, Carrillo JM, Cugat R, Sopena JJ, Rubio M (2023) Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells (Muse cells): The future of human and veterinary regenerative medicine. Biomedicines 11:636. 10.3390/biomedicines11020636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Deng Z, Li Y, Wu Y, Yao R, Cao Y, Wang M, Zhuo F, Zhu H, Kang HJ (2023) Ameliorative effects of mesenchymal stem cells on senescence-associated phenotypes in naturally aged rats. J Transl Med 22:722. 10.1186/s12967-024-05486-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie C, Jin J, Lv X, Tao J, Wang R, Miao D (2015) Anti-aging effect of transplanted amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells in a premature aging model of Bmi-1 deficiency. Sci Rep 5:13975. 10.1038/srep13975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Xing C, Hang Z, Guo W, Li Y, Shah R, Zhao Y, Zeng Z, Du H (2023) Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth rejuvenate the liver in naturally aged mice by improving ribosomal and mitochondrial proteins. Cytotherapy 25:1285–1292. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yaku K, Okabe K, Nakagawa T (2018) NAD metabolism: Implications in aging and longevity. Ageing Res Rev 47:1–17. 10.1016/j.arr.2018.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan L, Tu W, Zhao X, Wan H, Wu J, Zhao Y, Wu J, Sun Y, Zhu L, Qin Y, Hu L, Yang H, Ke Q, Zhang W, Luo W, Xiao Z, Chen X, Wu Q, He B, Teng M, Dai S, Zhai J, Wu H, Yang X, Guo F, Wang H (2024) Stem cell transplantation extends the reproductive life span of naturally aging cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Discov 10:111. 10.1038/s41421-024-00726-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida M, Satoh A, Lin JB, Mills KF, Sasaki Y, Rensing N, Wong M, Apte RS, Imai SI (2019) Extracellular vesicle-contained eNAMPT delays aging and extends lifespan in mice. Cell Metab 30:329-342.e5. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu X, Wu H, Zhao Y, Guo Y, Chen Y, Dong P, Mu Q, Wang X, Wang X (2018) Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells alleviate brain white matter injury via the enhanced proliferation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells in focal cerebral ischemic rats. Brain Res 1680:127–136. 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu L, Wen H, Liu C, Wang C, Yu H, Zhang K, Han Q, Liu Y, Han Z, Li Z, Liu N (2023) Embryonic stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles rejuvenate senescent cells and antagonize aging in mice. Bioact Mater 29:85–97. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang WZ, Lin YH, Su LJ, Wu MS, Jeng HY, Chang HC, Huang YH, Ling TY (2021) Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapy: mechanism, systemic safety and biodistribution for precision clinical applications. J Biomed Sci 28:28. 10.1186/s12929-021-00725-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


