Table 2. Comparison of cycling performance between previous studies and this work.
| Material | Modified method | Capacity retention | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | Mg doped | 83%@1C@100 cycles | 43 |
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | Na doped | 85.5%@1C@100 cycles | 44 |
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | Mg, Al, and La co-doped | 83%@1C@100 cycles | 45 |
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | Fe3+ doped | 87.1%@1C@100 cycles | 46 |
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | CoAl2O4 coated | 81.33%@1C@100 cycles | 47 |
| Li1.2Ni0.133Co0.133Mn0.534O2 | Na+ doped | 76.5%@1C@100 cycles | 48 |
| Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 | Li3V2(PO4)3 coated | 87.7%@1C@100 cycles | This work |