Table 2. Optimization results of CAP-M using the design of experiments by RSMa.
| Run | Particle size (nm) | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug release after 4 h (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.47 ± 1.43 | 89.3 ± 2.65 | 65.82 ± 4.53 |
| 2 | 25.89 ± 1.03 | 62.11 ± 3.22 | 60.36 ± 3.22 |
| 3 | 29.42 ± 0.53 | 56.2 ± 1.89 | 61.08 ± 2.64 |
| 4 | 17.81 ± 1.54 | 75.01 ± 4.53 | 66.52 ± 2.07 |
| 5 | 14.92 ± 2.03 | 87.97 ± 2.43 | 67.24 ± 3.04 |
| 6 | 23.82 ± 0.04 | 88.43 ± 2.11 | 64.07 ± 2.53 |
| 7 | 21.94 ± 0.42 | 85.24 ± 1.53 | 64.75 ± 1.53 |
| 8 | 22.69 ± 1.52 | 63.29 ± 1.11 | 62.48 ± 4.24 |
| 9 | 44.52 ± 1.68 | 28.19 ± 2.59 | 61.74 ± 2.67 |
| 10 | 35.41 ± 2.53 | 29.02 ± 2.31 | 58.94 ± 2.54 |
| 11 | 17.27 ± 2.11 | 76.92 ± 1.96 | 66.69 ± 3.25 |
| 12 | 42.08 ± 1.80 | 23.75 ± 1.04 | 55.45 ± 4.62 |
| 13 | 24.28 ± 0.98 | 55.45 ± 1.54 | 61.2 ± 2.34 |
| 14 | 17.35 ± 1.04 | 76.73 ± 2.45 | 66.87 ± 3.24 |
| 15 | 36.82 ± 1.66 | 32.93 ± 1.42 | 60.34 ± 2.89 |
Values are presented as means ± SD (n = 3).