Abstract
Within the biopharmaceutical industry, the cell line development (CLD) process generates recombinant mammalian cell lines for the expression of therapeutic proteins. Analytical methods for the extensive characterisation of the protein product are well established; however, over recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have rapidly become an integral part of the CLD workflow. NGS can be used for different applications to characterise the genome, epigenome and transcriptome of cell lines. The resulting extensive datasets, especially when integrated with systems biology models, can give comprehensive insights that can be applied to optimize cell lines, media, and fermentation processes. NGS also provides comprehensive methods to monitor genetic variability during CLD. High coverage NGS experiments can indeed be used to ensure the integrity of plasmids, identify integration sites, and verify monoclonality of the cell lines. This review summarises the role of NGS in advancing biopharmaceutical production to ensure safety and efficacy of therapeutic proteins.
Keywords: NGS, RNA-seq, DNA-seq, Transcriptomics, Multiomics, GOI, SNVs
A cell line development (CLD) campaign is the process used to establish a recombinant mammalian cell line suitable for the manufacture of a therapeutic protein. It starts with the transfection of a host cell line with a plasmid containing one or more genes of interest (GOIs), encoding the therapeutic protein sequences and a selectable marker [1]. The plasmid DNA is incorporated into the host cell chromosomes through either random, or site-specific integration. Cells with one or more integrated copies of the plasmid are selected by growth in a medium containing a selective agent for the marker gene. The resulting transfectants should also express the linked GOIs encoding the therapeutic protein polypeptides. An increased concentration of the selective agents for marker genes, such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glutamine synthetase (GS), can be used as a gene amplification strategy to increase the copy number of marker genes, thereby increasing the copy number and expression of the linked GOIs and generating more productive cell lines [2], [3], [4]. Alternatively, transposon-based strategies can be used to generate highly productive cell lines without the need for time consuming amplification steps [5], [6]. To isolate high yielding clonally derived cell lines that meet regulatory requirements, transfectant cells undergo a round of cell cloning where cell lines are isolated from a single progenitor cell and then screened to assess productivity. Clonal cell lines expressing high titers of recombinant protein are chosen for progressive expansion and further evaluation of characteristics, such as the production stability of the clone (i.e. maintenance of high levels of product expression over successive generations) and the quality of the recombinant protein, before cell banking.
The majority of approved biotherapeutic proteins are expressed in mammalian cells, with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells being the predominant host cell line [7]. The first CHO cell line was isolated in 1957 [8], and several different lineages, including CHO-K1, CHO-S, DUXB11, and DG44, were subsequently derived [9], [10].
CHO cell lines are an attractive host as they can express high levels of recombinant proteins with human-like folding and post-translational modification patterns and can be scaled up in suspension for manufacturing in large-scale bioreactors [11], [12]. However, the high productivity and versatility of CHO cells comes with genome plasticity and an error-prone DNA replication system [13] that is typical of immortalised cell lines. This results in chromosomal heterogeneity of the cell line populations, with cells having different complements of abnormal chromosome rearrangements and numbers [14].
The random integration of the expression plasmid at different CHO genomic loci can result in unwanted structural rearrangements affecting both the plasmid and host genome. Moreover, due to the inherent genetic instability of the CHO cell host, one or multiple copies of the GOI can be lost [15] or can accumulate variants in a subpopulation of a clonal cell line [16], affecting purity, titer, and quality of the final product, with subsequent effects on manufacturing and drug supply [17]. Mutations can also spontaneously occur in the host genes involved in protein post-translational modifications, such as those encoding glycosylation enzymes, and they can hence impact the product quality [18].
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a technology based on the high-throughput sequencing of DNA and RNA fragments and can be used to monitor different cell line characteristics during the steps of a CLD campaign (Fig. 1). Parallel sequencing of thousands of fragments is superior in coverage, sensitivity, quality, and data output [19], [20], [21] compared with traditional Sanger sequencing analyses. Several NGS chemistries are used to characterize fragments of different lengths [22], [23], [24]. In this review, we use ‘short-read technologies’ to refer to Illumina or Ion Torrent platforms and ‘long-read technologies’ to refer to Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) or Pacific Bioscience (PacBio) platforms.
Fig. 1.
This overview of cell line development (CLD) procedures highlights where next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques can be applied throughout the process.
NGS is a very powerful tool that can be deployed to monitor cell line quality during the CLD process and can also provide increased molecular understanding of CHO cell lines and cell culture processes, helping to build foundations for rational engineering strategies to continue to improve the performance of CHO cell systems. In this review, we summarise the applications of NGS in four main sections: 1) characterization of the host or clone genome; 2) RNA-seq analysis to characterize the host, clone, and culture process transcriptomes; 3) RNA-seq applications to detect variants in the GOI; 4) host, clone, and culture process epigenomic characterization. NGS can also be used to detect adventitious agents that can potentially infect CHO cells. Testing of the manufacturing cell banks of the production cell lines for these adventitious agents is a mandatory regulatory requirement to safeguard patients. NGS is now replacing animal-based viral safety testing methods, as encouraged in the recent revision to the ICH Q5A viral safety guidance [25]. As this topic has already been covered by several publications [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], it will not be discussed further in this review.
1. Characterization of the host or clone genome
The genome refers to the complete set of DNA of an organism. It includes protein-coding and non-protein-coding genes, intergenic regions, and specifies all the instructions necessary for an individual to develop, function, and reproduce. High-quality genome references of Chinese hamster [32], [33] CHO-K1 [34] and CHOZN [35] are fundamental for transcriptome and genome analysis of CHO cell lines. These resources build upon data, insights, and methodologies developed in previous studies [36], [37] and make the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in cell lines both feasible and straightforward [38], [39], facilitating the consequent selection of cell lines with desired genetic traits [40]. Whole genome characterization is a very data-rich assay that can discover important features of a given host or clone, but it is not typically performed during a CLD campaign. In fact, the primary focus is on the sequence verification of the plasmid prior to transfection, the detection of the plasmid integration sites in the CHO genome after cell cloning, and the assessment of the integrity of the GOIs and their associated regulatory regions, along with clonality verification in the subsequent steps of the CLD campaign. The verification of the sequences of the GOIs on the plasmid used for transfection is an important requirement and can be generated using capillary-based Sanger sequencing with sets of primers specifically designed for each plasmid. The advent of long-read-based methods has made it possible to speed up and reduce the cost of this process [41], [42], [43]. The integration of the plasmid into the host genome, which occurs following transfection and selection, can result in plasmid sequence concatemers and truncated and inverted repeats. For this reason, it is very important to monitor plasmid integrity and sequence identity. Cartwright et al. used PacBio single-molecule real-time technology to sequence amplimers of the plasmid before transfection and in stably transfected CHO cells at early and late generations. The study confirmed the genetic plasticity of the immortalized cell lines, reporting several low-frequency variants not identified in the plasmid before transfection, in one-third of the assessed samples [44], highlighting the potential for point mutations to impact recombinant gene sequences.
Paired-end short reads derived from RNA-seq or DNA-seq experiments of a recombinant cell line can also be specifically analysed to identify integration sites [45]. Enrichment strategies such as targeted locus amplification (TLA) or Cas-9 enrichment can be used with NGS to characterize the integrated plasmids and their surrounding regions, delivering a greater breadth of information than an amplicon-seq approach and being at the same time quicker and lower-cost than high-coverage genome sequencing. TLA is a cross-linking-based technique that generates complex DNA libraries, covering more than 100 kilobases surrounding a specific sequence [46], [47]. In combination with NGS, this technique enables the complete sequencing and haplotyping of targeted regions of interest and is suitable for integration site identification [48], [49]. Cas9 is a component of the bacterial clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system and can be used for targeted enrichment of specific genomic regions followed by long-read sequencing [50], [51], [52]. Owing to the length of the fragments, this approach results in more detailed information on the copy number, orientation, and structure of transgenes integrated into the same locus, which is otherwise difficult to infer with short-read sequencing. Where non-site-specific integration methods are used for cell line development, the integration sites, derived by the TLA/NGS or by the long-read sequencing experiments, are ‘molecular fingerprints’ univocally associated with an individual clonal cell line. Hence, integration site sequences can be used to verify the clonal origin of a cell line by using specifically designed qPCR primers to assess the integration sites of a defined number of subclones derived from the clone [53]. Clonality assurance can also be inferred by the statistical analysis of single-nucleotide variants derived by whole-genome sequencing characterizations. Khun et al. demonstrated that the most specific SNVs fixed in a clonally-derived cell line can be used to confirm clonal derivation of a cell line with high confidence and to quantify the clonal fractions present in non-clonal samples [54].
As with other mammalian cells, some genetic information related to mitochondrial function, including oxidative phosphorylation, is encoded by the mitochondrial genome in CHO cells. An analysis by Kelly et al. [55] revealed widespread mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in a panel of 22 CHO cell lines, in which 197 variants were identified with an allele frequency between 1 % and 99 %. Interestingly, loss-of-function mutations have been found with different frequencies among clones, suggesting a phenotypic effect of the mtDNA variation and providing a justification for the metabolic variability frequently observed in extended fed-batch cell culture [56].
The knowledge of the CHO genome and its annotation [57] provides the foundations for important CHO technology initiatives, such as the development of a genome-reduced CHO host [58] or the whole-genome CRISPR-based functional assays [35], aimed at developing the next-generation of CHO cell factories. Similarly, multiple genomic studies have been geared towards identifying expression hotspots suitable for targeted integration [59], [60], [61].
2. RNA-seq analysis to characterize the host, clone, and culture process transcriptomes
The transcriptome refers to the complete set of RNA transcripts produced by an organism at a given time and under specific conditions. It is composed of different types of RNAs (protein-coding and non-protein-coding) and reflects the expression of the genes at a given moment, providing insights into cellular functions and responses to environmental changes. Transcriptome analyses can be used to investigate the differential gene expression profiles that correlate with the phenotypic differences observed between hosts, as described in the comparison of CHO-S, CHO-K1, and DG44 CHO cell lines [62]. Könitzer et al. found that expression levels of sialyl transferases and enzymes synthesizing sialic acid precursors are correlated with differences in antibody glycosylation between CHO cell lines [63]. In a comparison of clones expressing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), Sha et al. [64] found a good correlation between product titer and the transcript level of the GOI. They also identified overexpression of genes involved in secretion and protein transportation in the high-producer clones. Similar results have been confirmed by a recent study on different clonal cell lines expressing mAbs and bispecific antibodies during fed-batch production [65]. In another study [66], cell lines with high specific productivity (qP) for a mAb showed upregulation of genes involved in protein intracellular transport and surprisingly also upregulation of genes associated with apoptosis and cell death. The same study also identified significant phenotypic differences between subclones derived from the same parental cell, explained by the genome or epigenome plasticity of the CHO cell lines [67]. Another transcriptome analysis [68] demonstrated that the transcript level of the GOI was the major qP determinant, whilst the expression of many genes related to cell growth and housekeeping functions was negatively correlated with it. Transcriptomic analyses have also been useful to understand the mechanisms of action of some media components and to better characterize feeding strategies. Kretzmer et al. demonstrated that the addition of bromodeoxyuridine to the media influences the electron transport chain [69], whilst Schulze et al. demonstrated that the supplementation of butyric acid regulates the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation and histone modification in an intensified CHO cell fed-batch process [70]. Genes involved in cell cycle and primary metabolism have also been found upregulated in feed-spiked cultures with a higher productivity [71]. RNA-seq was also able to identify furin as the main enzyme responsible for the undesirable cleavage of an IgG4 Fc-fusion protein [72].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are two major families of the non-protein-coding transcripts and are important regulators of gene expression.
MiRNAs are endogenous short RNAs (21–25 nucleotides) that promote cleavage or translational repression of their targets; they have important post-transcriptional regulatory roles in animals and plants [73] and have also been identified in CHO cell lines producing recombinant proteins. Their short length and ability to simultaneously target multiple genes make them ideal candidates for gene manipulation in biotherapeutic protein-expressing cell lines [74], [75], [76]. Several studies uncovering different mechanisms used by microRNAs to influence the production of recombinant proteins in CHO cell lines have been summarised in a review by Liu et al. [77]. LncRNAs are non-protein-coding transcripts greater than 500 nucleotides in length, mostly generated by RNA polymerase II, and have varied functions [78]. They have been shown to have a key role in gene regulation [79] and a recent CRISPR-Cas13 screen in five human cell lines demonstrated essentiality for some of them, independently of their nearest protein-coding genes [80]. RNA-seq has been used to identify lncRNAs in CHO cell lines [81], [82], and some studies correlated their expression with cell growth and productivity [83], [84].
Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is a high-resolution measurement of gene expression, made at the level of individual cells, capable of identifying rare cell types and unravelling the cellular dynamics that shape tissue heterogeneity. Whilst bulk RNA-seq provides a robust and cost-effective method to assess the overall gene expression landscape of a sample, scRNA-seq maximises the resolution of the assay, exploring cellular heterogeneity and discovering novel cell types, but it comes with a higher cost and a more complex data analysis and interpretation. Tzani et al. [85] used single cell transcriptomics to investigate the production instability of a CHO cell line expressing a mAb. They identified transcriptional heterogeneity in the cell population, with a reduced expression of the transgene and of the genes associated with protein production and assembly. Another scRNA study demonstrated transcriptome homogeneity in suspension CHO-K1 and adherent HEK293FT cells under standard culture conditions, with most of the observed differences primarily driven by the cell cycle [86].
Molecular mechanisms determining an optimal producer cell line are often complex and, generally, not simply related to a single gene or gene product [87], [88]. Transcriptome analyses can be used to better describe system-wide properties of a given host, clone, or culture process, and this information is valuable for the optimization of cell lines, media, and fermentation processes. Nevertheless, the high number of potential target genes and the lack of information on the mechanistic models governing biotechnological processes can be a limitation for transcriptomic analyses and, in general, of all omics experiments, challenging the observational results to become actionable [89]. Multi-omics approaches integrated with system biology models represent a valid strategy to provide a holistic view of the biological state of a sample. They can indeed capture the complexity of the processes more completely than any single omics approach and have been successfully applied to better understand diseases [90], [91], [92], to personalise treatments and optimize therapies in precision medicine [93], [94], [95], and also to better characterise recombinant CHO cell lines [96], [97], [98], [99].
3. RNA-seq applications to detect variants in the GOI
Protein primary structure is a critical quality attribute for biotherapeutics [100], [101]. A sequence variant of the GOI can indeed generate unwanted impurities, with consequences for the efficacy, stability, and safety of the final product. Different types of variants exist: single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) are the smallest genomic variants and consist of differences in a single nucleotide, whilst insertion/deletion variants (indels) are caused by extra or missing nucleotides and typically affect fewer than 50 nucleotides [102]. Structural variants (SV) are DNA rearrangements involving larger regions, which can include inversions and balanced translocations or large insertions or deletions [103]. The application of NGS analyses to characterize cell lines can be equally informative and, at the same time, faster than the traditional mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques [104] used to detect sequence variants in the product itself. Furthermore, NGS data analyses can inform on the underlying causes of sequence variants.
Differences in the library preparation, sequencing chemistry, and bioinformatic analysis used can result in varying levels of sensitivity and specificity of the analyses. Monitoring strategies based on amplicon sequencing of the GOI have been proven successful in CLD campaigns with confirmatory evidence from high-throughput protein analytical assays for variants with frequencies higher than 5 % [105]. Zhang et al. [106] demonstrated an increase in the occurrence of low-frequency (0.1 %-0.5 %) SNVs proportional to the population doubling levels (PDLs), confirming the genomic instability of the characterized cell lines. Interestingly, they also established a high-confidence lower limit of detection of 0.1 % in RNA-seq experiments.
Unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) are short arbitrary oligonucleotide sequences attached to the library fragments before the PCR amplification step and can be used to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. These unique tags, specific for each fragment, can be used to distinguish PCR duplicates of a single fragment from different fragments derived from a given transcript in RNA sequencing experiments [107]. Collapsing the amplimers and generating a high-quality consensus of PCR amplimer is also a valid strategy for reducing the rate of false positives with both short- and long-read sequencing technologies [108], [109], [110], [111], [112]. Untargeted RNA-seq experiments have, by definition, a less biased design compared with amplicon-seq experiments and hence can reveal the presence of chimeric transcripts or non-designed splicing products. The de novo reconstruction of untargeted RNA-seq short reads revealed mis-splicing and intron retention events in the heavy chain gene of a mAb-producing CHO clone [113]. These transcripts produced truncated heavy chain products and their assembly with light chain products mimicked the appearance of fragments identified by routine purity assays. In another mAb-producing CHO cell line, a similar approach combining MS analysis and genome sequencing was able to identify an abnormal heavy chain fusion transcript as the underlying cause of an aberrant heavy chain peptide with an extra mass of 11 kDa [114].
NGS analyses have been successfully employed for a wide range of applications and have demonstrated great sensitivity; however, these analyses are not exempt from challenges. The sequencing coverage in the experiment design and technical variables introduced during sample preparation, library construction, sequencing and bioinformatic analysis are factors determining false-positive and false-negative results [115]. CHO cell lines are easy to culture and generate samples, and this offers the possibility to perform experiments in replicates and/or in parallel to proteomics experiments. These can be integrated to provide a proteogenomic analysis of the results [116].
4. Host, clone, and culture process epigenomic characterization
The epigenome refers to the reversible modifications, on the DNA and/or its binding proteins (like histones), affecting gene expression without altering the DNA sequence [117]. These events can influence the stability of the GOI expression during long-term culture [118], [119] and have hence been the subject of many important studies. A seminal study pointed out differences among the genomes of six related CHO cell lines and demonstrated that culture conditions, media, and specific phenotypes are associated with distinct states of DNA methylation, maintained in the transition between exponential and stationary growth phases [120]. A subsequent study [121] demonstrated that DNA methylation in the promoter region is an ON/OFF switch for gene expression and it is followed by other layers of regulation involving histones and differentially expressed lncRNAs. Marx et al. [122] demonstrated that DNA methylation of promoters, either recombinant or endogenous, leads to the loss of active histone marks in favour of distinct repressive heterochromatin marks. These results are in agreement with the findings that targeting the DNA methyltransferase is a successful epigenetic strategy to enhance the expression level of the GOI and to increase the stability of expression in stable [123] and transient [124] systems. Dhiman et al. compared the genome and the transcriptome of stable and unstable CHO cell lines, with low, medium, or high copy number of the GOI [125]. They demonstrated that the integration site is a major determinant for the expression stability and developed a genome catalogue of loci that are favourable and unfavourable for targeted transgene integration.
NGS is the basis of multiple assays to characterize recombinant cell lines expressing therapeutic proteins and provides a comprehensive, high-throughput approach to several genetic analyses. Applications, largely employed in different biomedical fields, have the potential to uncover important aspects of the CHO biology. One example of this is the use of chromosome conformation capture techniques, which are employed to determine the physical interaction of genomic regions from the same or different chromosomes with each other and with nuclear structures [126]. In particular promoter capture Hi-C has been used to identify important transcriptional mechanisms mediated by long-range interactions between regulatory elements and gene promoters [127], [128]. This approach, combined with RNA-seq, can disclose the promoter-enhancer interactions, determining actively transcribed regions, also named transcription factories [129], and can be employed to describe the dynamic interactions of the GOI promoters during CHO cell culture processes. This analysis could also take advantage of the transcription starting sites atlas in CHO-K1 cell lines and Chinese hamster tissues published in a recent study [130].
Here, this review has summarised several studies using genome, epigenome and transcriptome analyses to uncover important features of recombinant CHO cell lines, disclosing mechanisms determining cell productivity and quality of the final product. These NGS assays aim to identify bottlenecks and opportunities to optimise the efficiency, and the productivity of biotechnological processes used to produce biotherapeutics. Typically, these assays are applied to pilot projects to support increased mechanistic understanding and platform development, due to cost and the uncertainty associated with execution time, interpretation and the actionability of the results. On the other hand, other assays like variant analysis of the GOI and clonality assays based on TLA analysis followed by specific insertion site qPCR can be routinely executed during CLD. This is possible thanks to multiple factors, including contained cost, defined execution timelines and standardised protocols for sample preparation, experimental set up and bioinformatics analyses. Overall NGS analyses constitute a comprehensive toolset to ensure quality, clonality, and stability of cell lines expressing biotherapeutics and can be used to enhance cell line development and cell culture process optimization which in turn have the potential to improve development timelines and reduce production costs for biologics.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Hatton Diane: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Dunn Sarah: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization. Grassi Luigi: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization. Harris Claire: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Conceptualization. Zhu Jie: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests: This work was supported by Biopharmaceutical Development, AstraZeneca. Authors L. G., C. H., J. Z., D. H. and S. D. are employees of AstraZeneca and have stock and/or stock interests or options in AstraZeneca.
Acknowledgements
Figures used in Fig. 1 have been downloaded from NIAID NIH BIOART [131] and licensed as ‘Public Domain’.
Glossary
- Alignment
The process of comparing a sequence of DNA or RNA with a reference genome or transcriptome. It is required by bioinformatic workflows used for different analyses likewise variant calling, gene expression quantification, RNA-seq, CHIP-seq, ATAC-seq.
- ATAC-sequencing
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing that combines active transposase treatment of the genome with NGS. It is used to unravel, genome-wide chromatin accessible regions.
- ChIP-sequencing
Chromatin immune precipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) that combines chromatin immunoprecipitation with NGS to identify genome-wide DNA binding sites for proteins (transcription factors, histones or other proteins interacting with the DNA).
- Coverage
Also known as sequencing depth, reports the number of times a nucleotide is sequenced, averaged on the size of the sequenced target (genome, transcriptome etc.). Higher coverage increases the accuracy of sequencing results.
- Chromosome conformation capture
Techniques used to determine physical interactions of genomic regions. Alternative methods have been developed with different scopes: 3 C detects interaction between known sites; 4 C detects unknown interactors of a known bait sequence; 5 C can identify all regions interacting within a given genome domain; and Hi-C is a genome-wide assay.
- Library Preparation
Preparation of DNA or RNA samples used for the sequencing, which might include the fragmentation of the material and the addition of adapters to the ends of the fragments for sequencing.
- Long-read sequencing
Technology able to decipher the sequence of long DNA or RNA fragments (typically at least 10,000 nucleotides) in a single continuous string.
- RNA-sequencing
RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is the characterization of the RNA transcripts present in a cell or tissue at a given time. It provides insights into gene expression profiles and functional characteristics of transcripts, likewise splicing events or presence of variants.
- Short-read sequencing
Technology used to decipher the sequence of DNA or RNA fragments in continuous strings of short length (hundreds of nucleotides). Single-end technology employs a single read to cover only one end of the sequenced fragment, whilst the paired-end provides more detailed information with two reads covering both ends of the fragment.
- Variant
A difference between the sequenced DNA or RNA and the reference genome or transcriptome. Variants consisting in substitutions of single nucleotides are defined single nucleotide variants (SNVs), when they affect the coding sequence of a gene they can be further classified as synonymous or non-synonymous or nonsense. Duplications, insertions, inversions, and translocations describe other types of variants. Structural variants (SVs) are alterations encompassing at least 50 base pairs.
References
- 1.Yang W., Zhang J., Xiao Y., Li W., Wang T. Screening strategies for high-yield chinese hamster ovary cell clones. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.858478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mortensen R., Chesnut J.D., Hoeffler J.P., Kingston R.E. Selection of transfected mammalian cells. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 9. 2003:5. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0905s62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kingston R.E. Stable transfer of genes into mammalian cells. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter 10. 2001 doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1017as12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mortensen R.M., Kingston R.E. Selection of transfected mammalian cells. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 9, Unit 9.5. 2009 doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0905s62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rajendran S., et al. Accelerating and de-risking CMC development with transposon-derived manufacturing cell lines. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118:2301–2311. doi: 10.1002/bit.27742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wei M., Mi C.-L., Jing C.-Q., Wang T.-Y. Progress of transposon vector system for production of recombinant therapeutic proteins in mammalian cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.879222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walsh G., Walsh E. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1722–1760. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01582-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Puck T.T. The genetics of somatic mammalian cells. Adv Biol Med Phys. 1957;5:75–101. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-3111-2.50006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wurm F.M. CHO Quasispecies—Implications for Manufacturing Processes. Processes. 2013;1:296–311. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wurm M.J., Wurm F.M. Naming CHO cells for bio-manufacturing: Genome plasticity and variant phenotypes of cell populations in bioreactors question the relevance of old names. Biotechnol J. 2021;16 doi: 10.1002/biot.202100165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim J.Y., Kim Y.-G., Lee G.M. CHO cells in biotechnology for production of recombinant proteins: current state and further potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:917–930. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3758-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wiberg F.C., et al. Production of target-specific recombinant human polyclonal antibodies in mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;94:396–405. doi: 10.1002/bit.20865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Spahn P.N., et al. Restoration of DNA repair mitigates genome instability and increases productivity of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119:963–982. doi: 10.1002/bit.28016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baik J.Y., Lee K.H. Growth rate changes in CHO host cells are associated with karyotypic heterogeneity. Biotechnol J. 2018;13 doi: 10.1002/biot.201700230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bandyopadhyay A.A., et al. Recurring genomic structural variation leads to clonal instability and loss of productivity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:41–53. doi: 10.1002/bit.26823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang S., et al. Identifying low-level sequence variants via next generation sequencing to aid stable CHO cell line screening. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31:1077–1085. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dahodwala H., Lee K.H. The fickle CHO: a review of the causes, implications, and potential alleviation of the CHO cell line instability problem. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;60:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sha S., Agarabi C., Brorson K., Lee D.-Y., Yoon S. N-Glycosylation design and control of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:835–846. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhong Y., Xu F., Wu J., Schubert J., Li M.M. Application of next generation sequencing in laboratory medicine. Ann Lab Med. 2021;41:25–43. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alekseyev Y.O., et al. A next-generation sequencing primer-how does it work and what can it do? Acad Pathol. 2018;5 doi: 10.1177/2374289518766521. 2374289518766521. 2374289518766521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Satam H., et al. Next-generation sequencing technology: current trends and advancements. Biology. 2023;12:997. doi: 10.3390/biology12070997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marx V. Method of the year: long-read sequencing. Nat Methods. 2023;20:6–11. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01730-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hu T., Chitnis N., Monos D., Dinh A. Next-generation sequencing technologies: an overview. Hum Immunol. 2021;82:801–811. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Slatko B.E., Gardner A.F., Ausubel F.M. Overview of next-generation sequencing technologies. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2018;122 doi: 10.1002/cpmb.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.ICH Q5A viral safety guidance. 〈https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q5ar2-guideline-viral-safety-evaluation-biotechnology-products-derived-cell-lines-human-or-animal-origin-step-5_en.pdf〉.
- 26.Bova R.A., et al. Validation of a next generation sequencing method for adventitious virus detection: Demonstration of sensitivity in multiple cell lines. Biol J Int Assoc Biol Stand. 2024;86 doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2024.101771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khan A.S., et al. Report of the third conference on next-generation sequencing for adventitious virus detection in biologics for humans and animals. Biol J Int Assoc Biol Stand. 2023;83 doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khan A.S., et al. A multicenter study to evaluate the performance of high-throughput sequencing for virus detection. mSphere. 2017;2 doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00307-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ng S.H., et al. Current perspectives on high-throughput sequencing (HTS) for adventitious virus detection: upstream sample processing and library preparation. Viruses. 2018;10:566. doi: 10.3390/v10100566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hirai T., et al. Evaluation of next-generation sequencing performance for in vitro detection of viruses in biological products. Biol J Int Assoc Biol Stand. 2024;85 doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2023.101739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wilson C.A., Simonyan V. FDA’s activities supporting regulatory application of ‘next gen’ sequencing technologies. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2014;68:626–630. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2014.01024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hilliard W., MacDonald M.L., Lee K.H. Chromosome-scale scaffolds for the Chinese hamster reference genome assembly to facilitate the study of the CHO epigenome. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117:2331–2339. doi: 10.1002/bit.27432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lewis N.E., et al. Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:759–765. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu X., et al. The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:735–741. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kretzmer C., et al. De novo assembly and annotation of the CHOZN® GS-/- genome supports high-throughput genome-scale screening. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119:3632–3646. doi: 10.1002/bit.28226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brinkrolf K., et al. Chinese hamster genome sequenced from sorted chromosomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:694–695. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rupp O., et al. A reference genome of the Chinese hamster based on a hybrid assembly strategy. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:2087–2100. doi: 10.1002/bit.26722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hammond S., Swanberg J.C., Kaplarevic M., Lee K.H. Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology. BMC Genom. 2011;12:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaas C.S., Kristensen C., Betenbaugh M.J., Andersen M.R. Sequencing the CHO DXB11 genome reveals regional variations in genomic stability and haploidy. BMC Genom. 2015;16:160. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1391-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Holst-Jensen A., et al. Application of whole genome shotgun sequencing for detection and characterization of genetically modified organisms and derived products. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:4595–4614. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9549-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li W., et al. Arrayed in vivo barcoding for multiplexed sequence verification of plasmid DNA and demultiplexing of pooled libraries. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brown S.D., Dreolini L., Wilson J.F., Balasundaram M., Holt R.A. Complete sequence verification of plasmid DNA using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ MinION device. BMC Bioinforma. 2023;24:116. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05226-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mumm C., et al. Multiplexed long-read plasmid validation and analysis using OnRamp. Genome Res. 2023;33:741–749. doi: 10.1101/gr.277369.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cartwright J.F., Anderson K., Longworth J., Lobb P., James D.C. Highly sensitive detection of mutations in CHO cell recombinant DNA using multi-parallel single molecule real-time DNA sequencing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:1485–1498. doi: 10.1002/bit.26561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Grassi L., Harris C., Zhu J., Hardman C., Hatton D. DetectIS: a pipeline to rapidly detect exogenous DNA integration sites using DNA or RNA paired-end sequencing data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2021;37:4230–4232. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.de Vree P.J.P., et al. Targeted sequencing by proximity ligation for comprehensive variant detection and local haplotyping. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:1019–1025. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hottentot Q.P., van Min M., Splinter E., White S.J. Targeted locus amplification and next-generation sequencing. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2017;1492:185–196. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6442-0_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stadermann A., et al. Structural analysis of random transgene integration in CHO manufacturing cell lines by targeted sequencing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119:868–880. doi: 10.1002/bit.28012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.O’Brien S.A., Ojha J., Wu P., Hu W.-S. Multiplexed clonality verification of cell lines for protein biologic production. Biotechnol Prog. 2020;36 doi: 10.1002/btpr.2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Slesarev A., et al. CRISPR/CAS9 targeted CAPTURE of mammalian genomic regions for characterization by NGS. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39667-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Leitner K., Motheramgari K., Borth N., Marx N. Nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing enables accurate and simultaneous identification of transgene integration sites, their structure and epigenetic status in recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2023;120:2403–2418. doi: 10.1002/bit.28382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Clappier C., et al. Deciphering integration loci of CHO manufacturing cell lines using long read nanopore sequencing. N Biotechnol. 2023;75:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aebischer-Gumy C., Moretti P., Little T.A., Bertschinger M. Analytical assessment of clonal derivation of eukaryotic/CHO cell populations. J Biotechnol. 2018;286:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kuhn A., Le Fourn V., Fisch I., Mermod N. Genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide variants allows for robust and accurate assessment of clonal derivation in cell lines used to produce biologics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117:3628–3638. doi: 10.1002/bit.27534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kelly P.S., et al. Ultra-deep next generation mitochondrial genome sequencing reveals widespread heteroplasmy in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Metab Eng. 2017;41:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gilbert A., McElearney K., Kshirsagar R., Sinacore M.S., Ryll T. Investigation of metabolic variability observed in extended fed batch cell culture. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:1519–1527. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hefzi H., et al. A Consensus genome-scale reconstruction of chinese hamster ovary cell metabolism. Cell Syst. 2016;3:434–443.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jerabek T., et al. In pursuit of a minimal CHO genome: establishment of large-scale genome deletions. N Biotechnol. 2024;79:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hilliard W., Lee K.H. A compendium of stable hotspots in the CHO genome. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2023;120:2133–2143. doi: 10.1002/bit.28390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hilliard W., Lee K.H. Systematic identification of safe harbor regions in the CHO genome through a comprehensive epigenome analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118:659–675. doi: 10.1002/bit.27599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Woo H.J., et al. Context-dependent genomic locus effects on antibody production in recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells generated through random integration. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024;23:1654–1665. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Singh A., Kildegaard H.F., Andersen M.R. An online compendium of CHO RNA-seq data allows identification of CHO cell line-specific transcriptomic signatures. Biotechnol J. 2018;13 doi: 10.1002/biot.201800070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Könitzer J.D., et al. A global RNA-seq-driven analysis of CHO host and production cell lines reveals distinct differential expression patterns of genes contributing to recombinant antibody glycosylation. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1412–1423. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sha S., Bhatia H., Yoon S. An RNA-seq based transcriptomic investigation into the productivity and growth variants with Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biotechnol. 2018;271:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bai Y., et al. Identification of cellular signatures associated with chinese hamster ovary cell adaptation for secretion of antibodies. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025;27:17–31. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Orellana C.A., et al. RNA-seq highlights high clonal variation in monoclonal antibody producing CHO cells. Biotechnol J. 2018;13 doi: 10.1002/biot.201700231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weinguny M., et al. Subcloning induces changes in the DNA-methylation pattern of outgrowing Chinese hamster ovary cell colonies. Biotechnol J. 2021;16 doi: 10.1002/biot.202000350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fomina-Yadlin D., et al. Transcriptome analysis of a CHO cell line expressing a recombinant therapeutic protein treated with inducers of protein expression. J Biotechnol. 2015;212:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kretzmer C., et al. Chemical and genetic modulation of complex I of the electron transport chain enhances the biotherapeutic protein production capacity of CHO cells. Cells. 2023;12:2661. doi: 10.3390/cells12222661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schulze M., et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals mode of action of butyric acid supplementation in an intensified CHO cell fed-batch process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022;119:2359–2373. doi: 10.1002/bit.28150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Reinhart D., Damjanovic L., Castan A., Ernst W., Kunert R. Differential gene expression of a feed-spiked super-producing CHO cell line. J Biotechnol. 2018;285:23–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Clarke C., et al. Transcriptomic analysis of IgG4 Fc-fusion protein degradation in a panel of clonally-derived CHO cell lines using RNASeq. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:1556–1562. doi: 10.1002/bit.26958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Müller D., Katinger H., Grillari J. MicroRNAs as targets for engineering of CHO cell factories. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:359–365. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hackl M., et al. Next-generation sequencing of the Chinese hamster ovary microRNA transcriptome: Identification, annotation and profiling of microRNAs as targets for cellular engineering. J Biotechnol. 2011;153:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jadhav V., et al. CHO microRNA engineering is growing up: recent successes and future challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:1501–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liu H.-N., Dong W.-H., Lin Y., Zhang Z.-H., Wang T.-Y. The effect of microRNA on the production of recombinant protein in CHO cells and its mechanism. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.832065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mattick J.S., et al. Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24:430–447. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00566-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Statello L., Guo C.-J., Chen L.-L., Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:96–118. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Liang W.-W., et al. Transcriptome-scale RNA-targeting CRISPR screens reveal essential lncRNAs in human cells. Cell. 2024;187:7637–7654.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 81.Motheramgari K., et al. Expanding the Chinese hamster ovary cell long noncoding RNA transcriptome using RNASeq. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117:3224–3231. doi: 10.1002/bit.27467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Vito D., Smales C.M. The long non-coding RNA transcriptome landscape in CHO cells under batch and fed-batch conditions. Biotechnol J. 2018;13 doi: 10.1002/biot.201800122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vito D., et al. Defining lncRNAs correlated with CHO cell growth and IgG productivity by RNA-Seq. iScience. 2020;23 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Novak N., et al. LncRNA analysis of mAb producing CHO clones reveals marker and engineering potential. Metab Eng. 2023;78:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2023.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tzani I., et al. Tracing production instability in a clonally derived CHO cell line using single-cell transcriptomics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118:2016–2030. doi: 10.1002/bit.27715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Borsi G., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals homogeneous transcriptome patterns and low variance in a suspension CHO-K1 and an adherent HEK293FT cell line in culture conditions. J Biotechnol. 2023;364:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Griffin T.J., Seth G., Xie H., Bandhakavi S., Hu W.-S. Advancing mammalian cell culture engineering using genome-scale technologies. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Monger C., et al. Towards next generation CHO cell biology: bioinformatics methods for RNA-Seq-based expression profiling. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:950–966. doi: 10.1002/biot.201500107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Masson H.O., Karottki, la C K.J., Tat J., Hefzi H., Lewis N.E. From observational to actionable: rethinking omics in biologics production. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41:1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hasin Y., Seldin M., Lusis A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol. 2017;18:83. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1215-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang X., Fridley B.L. Multi-omics data deconvolution and integration: new methods, insights, and translational implications. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2023;2629:1–9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2986-4_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chen C., et al. Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases. MedComm. 2023;4 doi: 10.1002/mco2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bernal-Casas D., Serrano-Marín J., Sánchez-Navés J., Oller J.M., Franco R. Advancing personalized medicine by analytical means: selection of three. Metab That Allows Discrim Glaucoma, Diabetes, Controls Metab. 2024;14:149. doi: 10.3390/metabo14030149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Acharya D., Mukhopadhyay A. A comprehensive review of machine learning techniques for multi-omics data integration: challenges and applications in precision oncology. Brief Funct Genom. 2024;23:549–560. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elae013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lunke S., et al. Integrated multi-omics for rapid rare disease diagnosis on a national scale. Nat Med. 2023;29:1681–1691. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02401-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yusufi F.N.K., et al. Mammalian systems biotechnology reveals global cellular adaptations in a recombinant CHO cell line. Cell Syst. 2017;4:530–542.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lin D., et al. CHOmics: a web-based tool for multi-omics data analysis and interactive visualization in CHO cell lines. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lee A.P., et al. Multi-omics profiling of a CHO cell culture system unravels the effect of culture pH on cell growth, antibody titer, and product quality. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118:4305–4316. doi: 10.1002/bit.27899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gopalakrishnan S., et al. Multi-omic characterization of antibody-producing CHO cell lines elucidates metabolic reprogramming and nutrient uptake bottlenecks. Metab Eng. 2024;85:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Alt N., et al. Determination of critical quality attributes for monoclonal antibodies using quality by design principles. Biol J Int Assoc Biol Stand. 2016;44:291–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gutierrez L., Cauchon N.S., Christian T.R., Giffin M.J., Abernathy M.J. The confluence of innovation in therapeutics and regulation: recent CMC considerations. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:3524–3534. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.genome.gov. 〈https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/fact-sheets/human-genomic-variation〉.
- 103.SV -ncbi. ncbi 〈https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/content/overview/#:~:text=I.-,Introduction,copy%20number%20variants%20〉(CNVs).
- 104.Lin T.J., et al. Evolution of a comprehensive, orthogonal approach to sequence variant analysis for biotherapeutics. mAbs. 2019;11:1–12. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2018.1531965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wright C., et al. Genetic mutation analysis at early stages of cell line development using next generation sequencing. Biotechnol Prog. 2016;32:813–817. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Zhang S., et al. Mutation detection in an antibody-producing chinese hamster ovary cell line by targeted RNA sequencing. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:8356435. doi: 10.1155/2016/8356435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Islam S., et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat Methods. 2014;11:163–166. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sun J., et al. Correcting PCR amplification errors in unique molecular identifiers to generate accurate numbers of sequencing molecules. Nat Methods. 2024;21:401–405. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02168-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lin X., et al. High accuracy meets high throughput for near full-length 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing on the Nanopore platform. PNAS Nexus. 2024;3 doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Girardot C., Scholtalbers J., Sauer S., Su S.-Y., Furlong E.E.M. Je, a versatile suite to handle multiplexed NGS libraries with unique molecular identifiers. BMC Bioinforma. 2016;17:419. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1284-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Clement K., Farouni R., Bauer D.E., Pinello L. AmpUMI: design and analysis of unique molecular identifiers for deep amplicon sequencing. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2018;34 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Kou R., et al. Benefits and challenges with applying unique molecular identifiers in next generation sequencing to detect low frequency mutations. PloS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Delmar J.A., et al. Monoclonal antibody sequence variants disguised as fragments: identification, characterization, and their removal by purification process optimization. J Pharm Sci. 2022;111:3009–3016. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Harris C., et al. Identification and characterization of an IgG sequence variant with an 11 kDa heavy chain C-terminal extension using a combination of mass spectrometry and high-throughput sequencing analysis. mAbs. 2019;11:1452–1463. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1667740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hardwick S.A., Deveson I.W., Mercer T.R. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:473–484. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Nesvizhskii A.I. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1114–1125. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Bernstein B.E., Meissner A., Lander E.S. The mammalian epigenome. Cell. 2007;128:669–681. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Kim M., O’Callaghan P.M., Droms K.A., James D.C. A mechanistic understanding of production instability in CHO cell lines expressing recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:2434–2446. doi: 10.1002/bit.23189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Veith N., Ziehr H., MacLeod R.A.F., Reamon-Buettner S.M. Mechanisms underlying epigenetic and transcriptional heterogeneity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines. BMC Biotechnol. 2016;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12896-016-0238-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Feichtinger J., et al. Comprehensive genome and epigenome characterization of CHO cells in response to evolutionary pressures and over time. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:2241–2253. doi: 10.1002/bit.25990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Hernandez I., et al. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells in response to the changing environment of a batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:677–692. doi: 10.1002/bit.26891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Marx N., et al. Enhanced targeted DNA methylation of the CMV and endogenous promoters with dCas9-DNMT3A3L entails distinct subsequent histone modification changes in CHO cells. Metab Eng. 2021;66:268–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Jia Y.-L., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout for DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in CHO cells displays enhanced transgenic expression and long-term stability. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:4106–4116. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Wang X.-Y., et al. Enhancing expression level and stability of transgene mediated by episomal vector via buffering DNA methyltransferase in transfected CHO cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120:15661–15670. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dhiman H., Campbell M., Melcher M., Smith K.D., Borth N. Predicting favorable landing pads for targeted integrations in Chinese hamster ovary cell lines by learning stability characteristics from random transgene integrations. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:3632–3648. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hakim O., Misteli T. SnapShot: chromosome confirmation capture. Cell. 2012;148 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.019. 1068.e1–2. 1068.e1–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Song M., et al. Mapping cis-regulatory chromatin contacts in neural cells links neuropsychiatric disorder risk variants to target genes. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1252–1262. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0472-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Javierre B.M., et al. Lineage-specific genome architecture links enhancers and non-coding disease variants to target gene promoters. Cell. 2016;167:1369–1384.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Rieder D., Trajanoski Z., McNally J.G. Transcription factories. Front Genet. 2012;3:221. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Shamie I., et al. A Chinese hamster transcription start site atlas that enables targeted editing of CHO cells. NAR Genom Bioinforma. 2021;3 doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.bioart. 〈https://bioart.niaid.nih.gov〉.

