Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2005 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers. 2004 Dec;72(6):1161–1190. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x

Table 2.

Study 2: Correlations Between Positive/Negative Emotional Granularity and Global Measures of Coping (N = 130)

Positive Emotional Granularity
Coping Scales r
COPE
 Acceptance .05
 Active coping −.16
 Behavioral disengagement .20*
 Denial .16
 Emotional support .00
 Humor −.07
 Instrumental support −.12
 Planning −.13
 Positive reframing .01
 Religion −.11
 Self-blame −.07
 Mental disengagement (self-distraction) −.26**
 Substance use .00
 Venting −.07
REI
 Experiential ability −.18*
 Experiential engagement −.18*
 Rational ability .00
 Rational engagement .01

Note: For ease of interpretation, intraclass correlations (ICCs) have been transformed, such that higher ICCs reflect higher emotional granularity.

**

p<.01.

*

p<.05.