Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Apr 23;22(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s11904-025-00739-y

Opportunities to Optimize Outcomes of Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV and Syphilis in Pregnancy: the Quest to Eliminate Maternal and Vertical Transmission

Dvora Joseph Davey 1,2,, Alex de Voux 2, Natalie Shaetonhodi 2, Michael Marks 3, Lisa Frigati 4, Tendesayi Kufa 5,6
PMCID: PMC12014709  PMID: 40263166

Abstract

Background

There is an urgent need to improve interventions for HIV and syphilis in pregnancy to achieve elimination.

Results

The tenets of vertical transmission strategies for HIV and syphilis overlap but have varying success due to differences in their transmission dynamics, diagnoses, and treatment. Key principles include prevention of maternal infection, screening and diagnosis early and throughout antenatal care, curative treatment (syphilis), viral load suppression (HIV), early infant diagnosis and treatment (HIV and congenital syphilis). We recommend improved guidelines, provider training and focused research and surveillance, including implementation studies to align HIV and syphilis screening and treatment during pregnancy. Opportunities to integrate syphilis screening and treatment into antenatal and HIV care enable providers to offer comprehensive maternal care.

Conclusion

Integrated HIV/syphilis services ensure a cohesive and person-centered approach, improving health outcomes through streamlined, efficient, and family-centered care pathways. We recommend key interventions to reduce HIV and syphilis in pregnancy and prevent vertical transmission.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11904-025-00739-y.

Introduction

HIV and syphilis infections during pregnancy pose critical public health challenges, significantly affecting both maternal and child health. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that in 2023, 1.2 million pregnant women were living with HIV (WLHIV) [1] and 120,000 children acquired HIV, the majority through vertical transmission (VT) [2]. Globally, the estimated prevalence of maternal syphilis in 2016 was 0.69 percent (95% CI = 0.57–0.81) [3]. In 2022 there were 523 cases of congenital syphilis (CS) per 100,000 live births [4], over ten times the WHO target of 50 cases per 100,000 live births for elimination of CS.

HIV in Pregnancy

Over half of HIV infections occur among cisgender women with notably high incidence among pregnant and lactating women (PLW) [5, 6]. Increased risk of HIV acquisition during gestation due to biological and behavioural changes coupled with potential for VT make HIV prevention among PLW a unique and critical global health priority [6, 7].

Women face an unacceptably elevated risk of HIV acquisition during pregnancy and breastfeeding [6]. HIV incidence during pregnancy and breastfeeding in Africa was estimated at 3.6/100 person-years between 2006–2017 and 4.2/100 person-years in southern Africa [5] and acute maternal HIV infection is associated with increased risk of VT [8]. Incident HIV in pregnancy and breastfeeding accounts for one-third of VT.

PLW require effective, female-controlled interventions to prevent HIV acquisition during pregnancy and breastfeeding [9]. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective tool for prevention of HIV in women at elevated risk [10]. The most widely available formulation of PrEP, an oral pill taken daily, presents challenges in persistence and adherence among PLW that undermine its prevention effectiveness [11, 12]. More promising long-acting injectable PrEP formulations (Cabotegravir and Lenacapavir) promise to overcome these challenges and must be made available to all PLW at risk of HIV acquisition prior to, during and after pregnancy (especially whilst breastfeeding) [13].

Untreated HIV can result in maternal morbidity, mortality, miscarriage, and preterm birth [14]. Between 2015 to 2023, global ART coverage among PLW plateaued around 84% [15], far below the second UNAIDS 95-95-95 target for elimination of VT. Global estimates of viral suppression (VS) among pregnant women at labor and delivery are lacking [16], with limited data from Africa reporting variable VS rates (<200 copies/ml) among pregnant women (56%–96%) [1619]. Younger women, those not on ART at their first antenatal visit, and those with poor adherence are more likely to be viremic [1620]. Expanding HIV treatment and adherence support to achieve VS, combined with primary prevention measures including oral and injectable PrEP, could accelerate progress toward the UNAIDS goal of reducing new HIV infections to below 375,000 and eliminating VT by 2025 [21].

Syphilis in Pregnancy

Syphilis is caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum, subspecies, pallidum which when left untreated will progress through a series of clinical stages. Syphilis is most infectious during the primary and secondary stages (early syphilis) characterized by clinical symptoms such as a painless, usually solitary, ulcerative lesion and lesions on the palms of the hands or the soles of the feet [22]. Globally approximately half of syphilis cases occur in cisgender women aged 15–49 [23]. VT of syphilis occurs via the transplacental route during pregnancy [24]. Although syphilis is treatable, the disease has seen a resurgence globally [2527]. Antenatal syphilis screening and treatment coverage remains low in many countries [28, 29], resulting in numerous untreated or inadequately managed cases, [3034] exacerbated by shortages of intramuscular benzathine penicillin-G (BPG), the only formulation currently recommended for treatment during pregnancy [35]. Gaps in the syphilis care cascade persist in both high- and low-income antenatal care (ANC) settings. Findings from a large cohort of pregnant WLHIV in Brazil demonstrated that 70% failed to receive the recommended syphilis screening during pregnancy. The study found women with detectable HIV RNA were more likely to receive syphilis screening suggesting a provider screening bias based on perceived risk of syphilis [36]. A study in the United States (U.S.) found 42% of pregnant individuals with syphilis between 2018 and 2021 were either inadequately treated or not treated at all. Limited access to timely prenatal care was identified as an important risk factor [37].

Staging syphilis to guide appropriate treatment during pregnancy is complex. WHO recommends a single dose of 2.4 million units (MU) BPG intramuscularly for early syphilis, and three weekly doses for late syphilis or syphilis of unknown duration [38]. Since many women are unsure when they acquired infection, the three-dose regimen is often recommended. Women must return weekly for treatment, and if a gap of >9 days occurs between doses it is recommended that the entire course be restarted [39], adding burden to women and health systems. Treatment should be initiated at least 30-days before delivery to reduce the risk of perinatal and neonatal complications [40], posing a challenge for women who initiate ANC late or become infected in their third trimester. Qualitative research among PLW, as well as healthcare providers revealed important barriers to effective antenatal syphilis screening, including inadequate provider training in syphilis management, lack of clear guidelines for antenatal syphilis screening, high testing costs, long distances to laboratories, late or no antenatal enrollment, and stigma [41, 42]. Untreated syphilis during pregnancy can lead to serious adverse outcomes including miscarriage, stillbirth, preterm birth, and congenital infection [43, 44]. Syphilis is a leading cause of preventable stillbirth globally [45].

Incidence of CS has been rising globally since the early 2000s [46, 47]. Between 2019 and 2023, incidence of maternal syphilis increased by 104% in the U.S., with a 106% increase in the incidence of CS. Between 2013 and 2023, the total number of reported CS cases increased by 740% (from 462 in 2013 to 3,882 cases in 2023), concurrent with a 580.8% increase (from 2.6/100,000 pregnant women in 2013 to 17.7/100,000 pregnant women in 2023) in primary and secondary syphilis among pregnant women. In 2023, 3,882 CS cases were reported in the U.S., including 279 CS-associated stillbirths, with an annual rate of 105.8 cases of CS/100,000 live births [48]. Similar trends have been observed in upper and LMICs [29]. In South Africa, maternal syphilis prevalence increased from 2.6% in 2019 to 3.2% in 2022 [49], with an increase in CS from 373 cases in 2020 to 1739 in 2023 [50, 51], in Malawi prevalence of maternal syphilis increased from 0.3% in 2014 to 1.9% in 2021 [52].

Epidemiology of Syphilis and HIV co-infection in pregnancy

Between 2016 and 2021, the global pooled prevalence of HIV among pregnant women was 2.9%, with maternal syphilis estimated at 0.8%. In low-income countries (LICs), HIV prevalence was 5.2% and syphilis was 3.3%, while in LMICs, pooled prevalence of HIV and syphilis was 3.3% and 1.5% respectively [53]. Co-infection rates among pregnant WLHIV are limited, ranging from 0.05% to 10.2% globally [54]. Geographic heterogeneity in co-infection rates are driven by disparities in HIV and syphilis screening and diagnosis, socioeconomic conditions, individual risk factors, prevention programs, and access to ANC and treatment [54, 55]. Underreporting and inadequate surveillance, particularly in LMICs, lead to an underestimation of syphilis severity and hinder understanding of the burden and epidemiology of HIV/syphilis co-infection among people of reproductive age and in pregnancy [56, 57]. Early and sustained VS among pregnant women is strongly linked to a lower risk of HIV VT [5861]. Genital ulcers, a symptom of primary syphilis, are linked to increased HIV transmission and acquisition [62]. Syphilis has been shown to double VT risk, with higher proportions of in-utero transmission among infants born to mothers with HIV/syphilis coinfection compared to those with HIV monoinfection [63].

Higher RPR titres at treatment and delivery are associated with an increased likelihood of syphilis VT [41]. Achieving serologic cure, a four-fold reduction in titre after adequate treatment, has been linked to younger age, higher baseline titres, and earlier stages of syphilis infection [64]. Associations between HIV status, CD4 count, and VL in WLHIV and syphilis serological outcomes remain inconsistent across studies [64] and limited among pregnant women. A 2022 study in Zambia observed that pregnant WLHIV showed greater reductions in RPR titres, faster rates of sero-reductions, and higher rates of serologic cure compared to pregnant women without HIV; [65] however, this study had a small sample size and could not control for syphilis treatment adherence between groups.

Lower socioeconomic status and educational levels, alcohol and drug use, and higher risk sexual behaviors increase the risk of HIV and syphilis among women of reproductive age [5, 55, 66]. While younger women are generally at higher risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), prevalence of HIV/syphilis co-infection during pregnancy is higher in women aged 25 years and older [6769], potentially due to condomless sex and use of oral (and injectable) PrEP [54, 70]. Low rates of partner testing and treatment for both HIV and syphilis also contribute to the sustained risk of infection among pregnant women [7174] and have been associated with worse birth outcomes [75].

Strategies for improving HIV and Syphilis prevention and treatment in pregnancy

Tenets of VT elimination strategies for HIV and syphilis overlap but have varying success due to differences in the natural history of disease, transmission dynamics, diagnostic tests, and treatments (Table 1). These strategies include primary prevention of maternal infection, screening and diagnosis early and throughout ANC, curative treatment (syphilis) or VS for HIV soon after diagnosis, infant post-exposure prophylaxis, early infant diagnosis (EID) and treatment.

Table 1.

Opportunities for integrated HIV and syphilis prevention and treatment strategies for mother-infant pairs

Maternal Infant Maternal and infant
Screening

Decentralized Testing: Implement point-of-care dual rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for HIV and syphilis at the first ANC visit to increase early detection of both infections. Incorporate screening and immediate treatment for other curable STIs

Repeat Testing: Align HIV and syphilis retesting schedules, including in the third trimester and at labour/delivery, to identify and treat new infections

Routine Newborn Screening: Align screening/evaluation for infants at risk of CS to monitoring protocols for HIV-exposed infants including screening at birth, 6 weeks, 9 months (or immunization visit), and 18-month follow-up intervals

Integration within broader contraception and PrEP services: Integrating HIV and syphilis screening into contraception and PrEP services improves health outcomes for women and girls by enabling early detection and treatment (including screening of syphilis and HIV), aligning with PrEP services, preventing complications, and providing comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services

Differentiated Models for Service Delivery: Increase access to home- or community-based screening for pregnant women and newborns in low-resource settings, such as through Community Health Workers, by incorporating combined screening and management of HIV and syphilis throughout pregnancy and the postnatal period

Diagnostics Multiplex Testing: Scale-up the use of multiplex point-of-care diagnostics (e.g., dual HIV/syphilis RDTs in women without HIV) to screen for HIV and syphilis in the same sample, improving efficiency and cost-effectiveness Early Infant Diagnosis: Align EID (including use of POC VL) with CS screening to improve immediate screening for HIV and syphilis in exposed infants Align maternal screening with infant screening in maternal-infant pairs in service delivery (in immunization, antenatal care, and contraceptive services)
Management

Integrated Management Protocols: Integrate management protocols where WLHIV are routinely tested and immediately treated for syphilis given its frequent co-occurrence, ensuring co-management of both infections

Biomarker monitoring: Package VL and treponemal titre value monitoring (where indicated), including at labour and delivery and 3–6 months after treatment and repeated if inadequate clinical or laboratory response to treatment

Partner Treatment: Screen and treat partners of pregnant women for HIV, syphilis, and other curable STIs to prevent reinfection and improve outcomes for the mother and child, including expedited partner therapy

Linkage to Care: Coordinate linkage-to-care strategies post-diagnosis, ensuring pregnant women with HIV and/or syphilis remain in care, adhere to treatment, and receive appropriate and comprehensive follow-up

Integrated Management Protocols: Where appropriate combine monitoring protocols for infants born to mothers with HIV and/or syphilis, ensuring they receive appropriate evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for both infections

Linking to Paediatric Care: Coordinate referral pathways to ensure that infants exposed to HIV and/or syphilis are linked to comprehensive paediatric care, with long-term follow-up to monitor growth and development

Postnatal Follow-Up Care: Strengthen postnatal care for both the mother and the infant by integrating HIV and syphilis management into routine health check-ups, ensuring that both receive ongoing monitoring and treatment, as necessary

Linkage to Comprehensive Care: For both mothers and infants, strong referral systems to specialized care (e.g., paediatric HIV or CS programs) ensure continuity of care and long-term health management for the family unit

Health Education: Provide education for mothers and families about the importance of adherence to treatment regimens, repeat testing, and follow-up care for both mother and child

Community-Based Support: Implement community-based interventions and differentiated models of service delivery which address both maternal and infant health, such as through Community Health Workers, Mentor Mothers, mobile clinics, or outreach programs, to ensure accessibility to prevention, treatment, and follow-up services

Surveillance systems Integrated ANC and Labour and Delivery Data Systems: Integrate surveillance platforms that enable linkage of both HIV and syphilis infections (co-infection), treatment outcomes, VL, and treponemal titre values in pregnant women throughout ANC and labour/delivery Integrated Neonatal Surveillance: Integrate surveillance systems that track both HIV and CS (and syphilis-associated birth complications) in newborns, enabling accurate data on co-infection cases, treatment outcomes, and follow-up care

Case Management Systems: Integrate case management systems which improve client-level service delivery and monitoring and provide healthcare workers with a comprehensive view of each woman’s medical history, HIV/syphilis/STI status, and social factors (e.g., partner support, socio-economic challenges, gender-based violence), allowing for person-centred care coordination and follow-up

Integrate mother-infant records: Link ANC, labour and delivery, and postnatal records for mothers and their infants, including VL and/or treponemal titres, ensuring that infants born to mothers diagnosed with HIV and/or syphilis are screened and receive comprehensive follow-up to ensure early diagnosis and improve integration of care across both conditions

Outcome Monitoring: Use surveillance data to monitor the success of interventions for both HIV and syphilis, such as ART, PrEP and syphilis treatment in preventing VT and adverse birth outcomes, and adapt strategies based on real-time monitoring and evaluation of outcome, need for improved definition of CS to adequately describe burden

Point-of-care (POC) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have revolutionized HIV and syphilis testing by providing quick results, typically 15–60 min [76, 77]. Cost-effectiveness [78] and diagnostic accuracy [79] of these tests have facilitated widespread use, decentralizing HIV and syphilis testing, improving case detection and timely treatment [8082]. Timely ART and/or BPG dramatically reduces risk of VT and sequelae [83]. POC RDTs minimize loss to follow-up in LMICs, which has been associated with delays due to turnaround time with traditional laboratory methods [38]. Dual HIV/syphilis RDTs for initial screening in ANC for pregnant women without known HIV infection [84], can improve diagnosis, timely treatment and prevent adverse outcomes [85]. Uptake of routine HIV/syphilis dual testing in ANC has been slow, with laboratory-based syphilis testing standard of care in many countries [86]. Competing public health priorities and limited resources hinder government funding and decision-making for diagnostics. In 2021, cost of dual HIV/syphilis RDT was under US$1, addressing cost barriers and promoting broader adoption and implementation by governments [87]. Lack of well-developed guidelines, limited healthcare worker training, and availability of accurate and user-friendly tests remain barriers [88]. As of 2023, 62% of countries with data available in UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM) used laboratory-based testing as the routine method for syphilis screening in ANC [86].

Early detection and treatment of maternal HIV and syphilis are vital for reducing VT risk and associated complications [89, 90]. WHO recommends that all pregnant women undergo serological testing for both HIV and syphilis during their first antenatal visit, followed by immediate treatment. Repeat HIV and syphilis screening later in gestation is also recommended for women with an initial negative test [89, 91]. Partner treatment is essential for syphilis management, including expedited partner therapy (EPT).

WLHIV should begin lifelong ART immediately [92]. With early detection, ART, and comprehensive care for WLHIV, VT risk of HIV can be reduced to less than 1% [9395]. Pregnant women with syphilis should receive immediate BPG [89]. When administered early in infection and pregnancy, BPG can prevent CS in 97% of cases, reduce stillbirths by 82%, preterm delivery by 64%, and neonatal death by 80% [96, 97].

Progress toward strengthening HIV and Syphilis interventions for pregnant women and newborns

In 2014, WHO established global guidelines to eliminate VT of HIV and syphilis, expanding these in 2021 to include hepatitis B virus (HBV) under the"triple elimination initiative” [98]. This paradigm shift emphasizes moving away from siloed programming toward integration of prevention, detection and treatment within maternal-child health programmes. Considerable progress has been made toward elimination of HIV VT over the past 5 years, driven by primary and secondary prevention interventions (including PrEP), increased testing and ART coverage, and integration of HIV treatment into antenatal and postnatal care. While many VT programmes were designed around HIV interventions, notable progress has been made in integrating syphilis, with 79% of 149 countries with available data in UNAIDS GAM having national plans for eliminating VT of syphilis, and 87% of these plans integrating syphilis and HIV [86]. To date, 11 Latin American, 3 Asian, and 5 Eastern European countries have received WHO validation for elimination of VT of HIV and/or syphilis [99]. WHO’s Path to Elimination initiative provides a tier-based framework for achieving triple elimination in high burden countries [100], with Botswana and Namibia becoming the first high-burden countries certified on the path to HIV elimination. Gaps in the syphilis care continuum, limited availability of routine antenatal syphilis screening and treatment data, and challenges with CS case definitions and surveillance pose challenges to certification for syphilis. WHO developed a tool for national programmes to model CS cases, including stillbirths, and forecast testing and treatment needs [101]. The tool has been shown to improve country-level monitoring toward VT of syphilis [102], although estimates remain limited by gaps in national surveillance and diagnostic data used to parameterize the model.

Advancement in research on HIV and Syphilis prevention, screening and treatment in pregnancy

Screening and diagnostics

Syphilis diagnostic research is growing, which is critical for prompt and accurate detection and treatment during pregnancy. A recent systematic review found that treponemal POCT increased syphilis screening rates and reduced syphilis-related adverse pregnancy outcomes more effectively than no screening, laboratory-based RPR and TPHA screening, or non-treponemal POCTs [82]. Novel approaches to strengthening screening uptake among pregnant women are needed. A recent study of opt-out syphilis screening in the emergency department in Chicago increased pregnancy screening from 6 to 50%, and a 750% increase in diagnosed cases of active syphilis [103]. Because pregnant women in the U.S. often seek ANC in emergency departments [104], this highlights a differentiated approach to increasing syphilis screening at critical touchpoints. South Africa has moved to more frequent syphilis screening during pregnancy, aligned with the HIV testing schedule, including screening ≥ 4 times during pregnancy, with use of the dual HIV/syphilis test in women without HIV [105]. Use of the dual HIV/syphilis POCT facilitates testing for both infections with a single finger prick, but does require revision of existing HIV testing algorithms to ensure alignment of HIV/syphilis recommended screening frequencies. Test algorithms for pregnant WLHIV or who are newly diagnosed with HIV during pregnancy will also need to be tailored, particularly in a context like South Africa with high HIV prevalence and incidence among pregnant women. The revised screening strategy should be accompanied with healthcare provider training and supporting guidance, and evaluation of implementation outcomes.

Approaches to increasing access to timely ANC and strengthening testing implementation and uptake in these settings are urgently needed. In Kenya, HIV self-testing was feasible and acceptable to improve uptake of repeat HIV testing among PLW [106], highlighting the promise and importance of person-centred and female-controlled interventions. Early initiation of ANC was improved through a community-based home pregnancy screening that was acceptable among women, which enabled earlier screening and treatment [107]. A meta-analysis reported that detection of syphilis during the first or second trimester reduced the risk of preterm birth by 47%, stillbirth by 86%, and low-birth weight by 63% when compared to detection within the third trimester [108].

Treatment and management

Community-based health care was effective in enhancing HIV-related health outcomes for mothers and children in low-resourced settings, particularly when integrated with facility-based approaches [109]. In Zambia, one-on-one counselling, home-based couples and male partner HIV testing, referrals to ART for male partners living with HIV, and appointment reminders via phone or SMS increased ART initiation and adherence among pregnant WLHIV [110]. Integrated, family-focused VT packages, including task-shifting, POC testing, integrated service provision for mother and infant, and community and male-partner engagement has improved maternal ART uptake and retention of mother-infant pairs [111]. WHO has updated its guideline to recommend POC VL testing for pregnant WLHIV [112]. POC VL testing has expanded testing access, minimized turnaround times, provided same-day results, and enabled timely clinical responses to elevated VL, thereby supporting continuous treatment and effective VS [113115]. Innovative strategies to improve syphilis treatment completion and adherence among pregnant women are essential. Incorporating provider-focused behavioural interventions—engaging opinion leaders, client reminders, audits with feedback, supportive supervision, along with POCT kits—led to nearly 100% of pregnant women screened for syphilis and ensured treatment for all WLHIV. This approach achieved more than double the treatment rate compared to using POCT kits alone [116].

Novel approaches to strengthening partner engagement as a key strategy for prevention and management of maternal HIV and STIs are critically needed. In Kenya, Zambia, South Africa, and Uganda distribution of HIV self-testing (HIVST) for male partners of pregnant women was acceptable and effective at increasing partner testing rates when compared to clinic-based testing [117120]. However, these studies also found gaps in linkage to ART among male partners, indicating intervention designs need to consider approaches for linkage between HIVST and ART initiation for male partners. In South Africa, HIVST together with adherence biofeedback counselling for pregnant women on PrEP and their partners was acceptable by pregnant women and led to substantial increases in both PrEP adherence among pregnant women and partner testing when compared to the standard of care [120], indicating the potential of HIVST for partners to also strengthen primary prevention of HIV in PLW. In Kenya, HIV testing and counselling advisors provided in-home testing for pregnant couples and educational support for serodiscordant couples, resulting in increased male partner testing and disclosure of HIV status and an increase in identification of serodiscordant couples [121]. EPT is widely recognized for its effectiveness in preventing recurrent STIs [122, 123]. A recent study that provided pregnant women who screened STI positive with options for partner treatment (contact slips, in-clinic treatment, or expedited partner therapy) demonstrated that EPT improved partner treatment [124]. Studies should explore novel approaches to administering injectable BPG in partner-friendly clinical or community spaces or interventions to improve adherence to the alternative regimen of 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 14-days.

HIV early infant testing and diagnosis

Studies have demonstrated that POC HIV testing for EID is accurate, practical, and acceptable, and improves timely initiation of ART for HIV-positive infants when compared to standard-of-care centralised laboratory-based testing [125]. The effectiveness of differentiated models of service delivery for mother-infant pairs and EID has also been recently evaluated. Community-facility linkage models including Mentor Mother (mothers2 mothers [126]) and similar facility-based peer support models, decreased VT, improved EID rates, and reduced loss-to-follow-up, when compared to mother-infant pairs who received standard of care or no facility-community linkage support [127130].

Syphilis diagnostics in infants

Laboratory-based CS diagnosis is challenging because maternal treponemal antibodies cross the placenta during pregnancy and can persist for >5-months [131]. WHO CS case definition includes previously undiagnosed and untreated infants with non-reactive non-treponemal titres at ≥6-months [38]. As a result most guidelines suggest that syphilis-exposed infants have a non-treponemal test performed at birth as well as a careful examination looking for signs and symptoms of syphilis which present later. Clinical signs in the infant associated with in-utero HIV transmission may overlap with that of CS, for example infants may have microcephaly and hepatosplenomegaly at birth. A quantitative non-treponemal titre that is fourfold higher than the maternal titre is highly suggestive of CS, however a negative RPR does not exclude CS and most infected infants have titres that are the same or less than the mother’s titre. There are not commercially available treponemal IgM tests for use in infants, as sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal. Research into better diagnostics for CS is essential to adequately quantify burden and ensure optimal treatment. While WHO’s surveillance case definition for CS supports standardized reporting across countries, currently there is no agreed upon WHO definition for clinical diagnosis of CS.

Opportunities for integrated HIV and syphilis services in ante- and postnatal care

Although specific services for prevention of HIV and syphilis differ, there are important interventions which overlap at key timepoints during ante and postnatal care (Fig. 1), presenting opportunities for bundling HIV and syphilis services across the care continuum (Table 1). Bundled HIV and syphilis counselling and testing, especially with POC diagnostics, allows simultaneous screening for both infections, increasing likelihood of early detection and timely treatment (same-day initiation or re-initiation of ART and BPG treatment for syphilis), which are critical in preventing VT of HIV and syphilis as well as adverse pregnancy and neonatal or infant morbidity and mortality [132]. Utilizing dual RDTs or multiplex tests for HIV and syphilis reduces the need for multiple visits and additional phlebotomy, lowering healthcare costs and minimizing burdens on both women and healthcare systems, especially in low-resource settings [85, 133].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overlap of HIV and syphilis services delivery and opportunities for improved integration for pregnant women and infants

Coordinated screening and management protocols, including at the first antenatal and third trimester visit, and labour/delivery enable coordinated testing, treatment, and follow-up, ensuring that pregnant WLHIV and/or syphilis receive comprehensive, prompt care throughout pregnancy and postpartum. Additionally, monitoring both VL and non-treponemal titres together, where indicated, supports personalized treatment adjustments and can support coordinated and streamlined health systems resources [134]. By consolidating records and case management for mother-infant pairs, healthcare providers gain a comprehensive view of each mother-infant pair, reducing fragmentation and ensuring that follow-up assessments and care are continuous and appropriate. Leveraging differentiated models of service delivery, including community and facility-community linkages, for HIV and syphilis services would facilitate access to person-centred care, making it easier for pregnant women, mother-infant pairs, and partners to receive essential health services within their communities. Integrating HIV and syphilis partner notification and treatment can help identify co-infection, reduce syphilis reinfection, and addresses broader family health needs. Counselling for HIV and syphilis should be provided to support disclosure, when ready, and support partner testing and treatment, including use of at-home HIV self-testing and referral for partner testing and treatment for syphilis and other STIs (e.g., EPT). There is a well-documented link between HIV/STI disclosure and an increased risk of intimate partner violence, [135137] which can significantly hinder care-seeking and treatment adherence for pregnant women [138]. Partner notification and engagement strategies must be designed and implemented with the safety and wellbeing of women at the centre, including counselling on the risk that HIV or syphilis status disclosure may present. Findings from qualitative work in rural Kenya suggest that strategies should complement clinic services with community-based approaches such as encouraging male partners to take on a supportive role in maternal health and including male partners in health-related decisions such as antenatal HIV testing [137].

Challenges with integrating services

Effective service delivery within integrated HIV and syphilis programmes requires significant resources, including a well-trained health workforce, adequate diagnostic equipment and supplies, infrastructure readiness, and strong funding and policy support are needed. Workforce shortages (including unclear responsibilities for which providers deliver integrated HIV and syphilis care), and inconsistent access to diagnostic tests and treatments, particularly in rural areas, present major obstacles to equitable integration of HIV and syphilis services [41, 139]. Operational challenges—including insufficient provider training and refresher programs, unclear testing and screening guidelines, gaps in supportive supervision, frequent stockouts or expired test kits or BPG for syphilis, compounded with overburdened staff, and inadequate data tools to document test results and treatments—hinder the effective and sustainable implementation of integrated programs [140, 141]. There is concern about cost and cost-effectiveness of this resource-intensive comprehensive package of care. Implementation of additional services, including scale-up of screening tests, may incur downstream costs for end-users, in this case pregnant women. Providing free screening services in antenatal and postnatal care has been found to increase screening uptake [142]. Governments must address issues around governance of vertical programming at national and sub-national levels, resource allocation, and implications of bundled service provision on health systems and end-users to ensure equity, sustainability, and effectiveness of VT prevention [4247, 49151].

Future Research Recommendations:

We recommend focused research, including implementation science studies, to improve the integration of syphilis and HIV in pregnancy, including:

  1. Implementation science studies on how to improve integration of HIV and syphilis diagnostics and treatment.

  2. Studies on improved diagnostics and treatment protocols for syphilis which could follow the model of HIV management, where a combination of early diagnosis and rapid ART initiation have contributed towards reduced VT.

  3. Research on improved syphilis diagnostics for infants in the early neonatal period including IgM, PCR and novel antigen detection tests.

  4. Safe, effective, and accessible treatment for pregnant women, minimizing VT risk and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including combination therapies e.g. long-acting penicillin and ART or PrEP combinations.

  5. Integration of HIV and syphilis screening in contraceptive services including pre-conception services for women who wish to become pregnant for HIV testing, ART initiation, PrEP for prevention, syphilis screening and treatment.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author Contribution

DJD wrote the outline for the review paper, reviewed the paper and wrote the first and final drafts. NS conducted the literature review and developed the Figure and Tables. ADV reviewed the literature and contributed to the introduction and first draft of the findings. LF, TKC and MM reviewed the drafts, provided substantive input and revisions. All authors approved the final draft.

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,R01HD106862

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. HIV – Estimated percentage of pregnant women living with HIV who received antiretrovirals for preventing mother-to-child transmission. Global Health Observatory. 2024. Accessed September 11, 2024. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/estimated-percentage-of-pregnant-women-living-with-hiv-who-received-antiretrovirals-for-preventing-mother-to-child-transmission
  • 2.UNICEF. Progress in reducing new HIV infections among children has stagnated in recent years. Elimination of mother-to-child transmission. 2024. Accessed October 31, 2024. https://data.unicef.org/topic/hivaids/emtct/
  • 3.World Health Organization. Investment case for eliminating mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: Promoting better maternal and child health and stronger health systems. Published online 2012
  • 4.World Health Organization. Strategic Information. Global Sexually Transmitted Infections Programme. 2024. Accessed October 31, 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/stis/strategic-information
  • 5.Graybill LA, Kasaro M, Freeborn K, et al. Incident HIV among pregnant and breast-feeding women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2020;34(5):761. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kerry A Thomson, James Hughes, Jared Baeten, et al. Increased Risk of HIV Acquisition Among Women Throughout Pregnancy and During the Postpartum Period: A Prospective Per-Coital-Act Analysis Among Women With HIV-Infected Partners. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2018;218(1):16–25. 10.1093/infdis/jiy113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.The Lancet HIV. The path to elimination of vertical transmission of HIV. The Lancet HIV. 2022;9:2 e67. 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moodley D, Esterhuizen T, Reddy L, et al. Incident HIV infection in pregnant and lactating women and its effect on mother-to-child transmission in South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2011;203(9):1231–4. 10.1093/infdis/jir017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.UNICEF, UNAIDS, WHO. Key considerations for programming and prioritization. Going the ‘Last Mile’ to EMTCT: A road map for ending the HIV epidemic in children. Published online February 2020
  • 10.World Health Organization. Preventing HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of PrEP. Published online 2017. Accessed October 29, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIV-2017.09
  • 11.Joseph Davey DL, Mvududu R, Mashele N, et al. Early pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation and continuation among pregnant and postpartum women in antenatal care in Cape Town, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(2):e25866. 10.1002/jia2.25866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Celum C, Hosek S, Tsholwana M, et al. PrEP uptake, persistence, adherence, and effect of retrospective drug level feedback on PrEP adherence among young women in southern Africa: Results from HPTN 082, a randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021;18(6):e1003670. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bekker LG, Das M, Karim QA, et al. Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir or Daily F/TAF for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Women. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(13):1179–92. 10.1056/NEJMoa2407001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wedi COO, Kirtley S, Hopewell S, Corrigan R, Kennedy S, Hemelaar J. Perinatal outcomes associated with maternal HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect. The Lancet HIV. 2016;3(1):e33–48. 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00207-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Data on the HIV response. The Global Health Observatory. 2024. Accessed September 3, 2024. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/hiv-aids/data-on-the-hiv-aids-response
  • 16.Woldesenbet S, Cheyip M, Lombard C, et al. Progress towards the UNAIDS 95–95-95 targets among pregnant women in South Africa: Results from the 2017 and 2019 national Antenatal HIV Sentinel Surveys. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):e0271564. 10.1371/journal.pone.0271564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ntombela N, Kharsany A, Soogun A, et al. Viral suppression among pregnant adolescents and women living with HIV in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a cross sectional study to assess progress towards UNAIDS indicators and Implications for HIV Epidemic Control | Reproductive Health | Full Text. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(116). 10.1186/s12978-022-01419-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Endalamaw Alamneh D, Shiferaw M, Getachew Demissie M, et al. Virological outcomes among pregnant women in ART | HIV. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2023;15:206–2016. 10.2147/HIV.S389506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Woldesenbet SA, Kufa T, Barron P, et al. Viral suppression and factors associated with failure to achieve viral suppression among pregnant women in South Africa. AIDS. 2020;34(4):589–97. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.UNAIDS. Progress towards the Start Free, Stay, Free, AIDS Free Targets: 2020 Report.; 2020. https://free.unaids.org/
  • 21.Bekker LG, Brown B, Joseph-Davey D, et al. Southern African guidelines on the safe, easy and effective use of pre-exposure prophylaxis: 2020. Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine. 2020;21(1):1152. 10.4102/sajhivmed.v21i1.1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hook EW. Syphilis. The Lancet. 2017;389(10078):1550–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32411-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization. STI: Incident cases of syphilis in 15-49 year olds (in thousands). The Global Health Observatory. 2024. Accessed November 26, 2024. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/incident-cases-of-syphilis-in-individuals-(in-millions)
  • 24.Stafford IA, Workowski KA, Bachmann LH. Syphilis Complicating Pregnancy and Congenital Syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(3):242–53. 10.1056/NEJMra2202762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report for 2022. ECDC; 2024
  • 26.New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. 2024 Health Advisory #4: Increases in Syphilis Among Females and Congenital Syphilis in New York City. NYC DHMH; 2024
  • 27.Kojima N, Klausner JD. An Update on the Global Epidemiology of Syphilis. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018;5(1):24–38. 10.1007/s40471-018-0138-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.World Health Organization. Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Published online July 15, 2021. Accessed September 4, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027077
  • 29.Gilmour LS, Walls T. Congenital Syphilis: a Review of Global Epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023;36(2):e00126-e222. 10.1128/cmr.00126-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Malisa RA, Ndaboine E, Chibwe E, et al. Treponema pallidum infection among women with macerated stillbirth in Mwanza Tanzania: an underestimated tragedy in Tanzania. Afr Health Sci. 2022;22(3):72–80. 10.4314/ahs.v22i3.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ojo OC, Arno JN, Tao G, Patel CG, Dixon BE. Syphilis testing adherence among women with livebirth deliveries: Indianapolis 2014–2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):739. 10.1186/s12884-021-04211-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hawkes S, Matin N, Broutet N, Low N. Effectiveness of interventions to improve screening for syphilis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11(9):684–91. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70104-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Health Organization. Proportion of women accessing antenatal care services who were tested for syphilis. Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing. 2024. Accessed September 11, 2024. https://platform.who.int/data/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-ageing/indicator-explorer-new/mca/proportion-of-women-accessing-antenatal-care-services-who-were-tested-for-syphilis
  • 34.Goh BT, Thornton AC. Antenatal screening for syphilis. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(5):345–6. 10.1136/sti.2007.026633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nurse-Findlay S, Taylor MM, Savage M, et al. Shortages of benzathine penicillin for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis: An evaluation from multi-country surveys and stakeholder interviews. PLoS Med. 2017;14(12):e1002473. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Castilho JL, Fonseca FF, Kim A, et al. Prenatal syphilis and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with HIV receiving ART in Brazil: a population-based study. Lancet Reg Health - Am. 2024;39:100894. 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tannis A, Miele K, Carlson JM, et al. Syphilis Treatment Among People Who Are Pregnant in Six U.S. States, 2018–2021. Obstetrics & Gynecology. Published online April 17, 2024. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.World Health Organization. WHO Guideline on Syphilis Screening and Treatment for Pregnant Women. In: WHO Guideline on Syphilis Screening and Treatment for Pregnant Women. World Health Organization; 2017. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499744/
  • 39.Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Syphilis During Pregnancy. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. 2021. Accessed October 28, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/syphilis-pregnancy.htm
  • 40.Sheffield JS, Sánchez PJ, Morris G, et al. Congenital syphilis after maternal treatment for syphilis during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):569–73. 10.1067/mob.2002.121541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nkamba D, Mwenechanya M, Kilonga AM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of antenatal syphilis screening and treatment for the prevention of congenital syphilis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia: results of qualitative formative research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):556. 10.1186/s12913-017-2494-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bocoum FY, Kouanda S, Zarowsky C. Barriers to antenatal syphilis screening in Burkina Faso. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17(Suppl 1):12. 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fentie EA, Yeshita HY, Shewarega ES, Boke MM, Kidie AA, Alemu TG. Adverse birth outcome and associated factors among mothers with HIV who gave birth in northwest Amhara region referral hospitals, northwest Ethiopia, 2020. Sci Rep. 2022;12:22514. 10.1038/s41598-022-27073-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gomez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(3):217–26. 10.2471/BLT.12.107623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes—Estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211720. 10.1371/journal.pone.0211720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bowen V, Su J, Torrone E, Kidd S, Weinstock H. Increase in incidence of congenital syphilis - United States, 2012–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(44):1241–5. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6444a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Congenital syphilis - United States, 2003–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(14):413–417 [PubMed]
  • 48.Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Overview of STIs in 2023. STI Statistics. November 7, 2024. Accessed November 28, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/summary.html
  • 49.Tendesayi Kufa-Chakezha, Nosipho Shangase, Carl Lombard, Samuel Manda, Adrian Puren. The 2022 Antenatal HIV Sentinel Survey. NICD; 2022. https://www.nicd.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Antenatal-survey-2022-report_National_Provincial_12Jul2023_Clean_01.pdf#page=3.08
  • 50.Morifi M, Kufa-Chakezha T. Congenital Syphilis Quarterly Surveillance Report: December 2020. National Institute for Communicable Disease (NICD); 2021
  • 51.Kufa-Chakezha T, Thabane E, Leshaba D, Puren A. Congenital Syphilis Annual Surveillance Report, South Africa 2023 (under Review). National Institute for Communicable Disease (NICD); 2024
  • 52.Chirombo J, Majamanda A, Gunsaru V, et al. The prevalence of gestational syphilis in Malawi between 2014 and 2022: spatiotemporal modeling of population-level factors. Front Public Health. 2024;11:1242870. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1242870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu S, Wang J, Guo Q, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and hepatitis B and C virus infections in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(8):1000–7. 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ferreira S da S, Carvalho JKM, Nascimento AKL, Ferreira AGN, Neto MS, Bezerra JM. Clinical-epidemiological characteristics of pregnant women with HIV/syphilis coinfection: an integrative review. Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção. 2023;13(4):232–239
  • 55.Hussen S, Tadesse BT. Prevalence of Syphilis among Pregnant Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:e4562385. 10.1155/2019/4562385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Qin J, Yang T, Xiao S, Tan H, Feng T, Fu H. Reported estimates of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with and without syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102203. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Salomè S, Cambriglia MD, Montesano G, Capasso L, Raimondi F. Congenital Syphilis: A Re-Emerging but Preventable Infection. Pathogens. 2024;13(6):481. 10.3390/pathogens13060481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Forbes JC, Alimenti AM, Singer J, et al. A national review of vertical HIV transmission. AIDS. 2012;26(6):757–63. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328350995c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tubiana R, Le Chenadec J, Rouzioux C, et al. Factors associated with mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 despite a maternal viral load <500 copies/ml at delivery: a case-control study nested in the French perinatal cohort (EPF-ANRS CO1). Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(4):585–96. 10.1086/650005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mandelbrot L, Tubiana R, Le Chenadec J, et al. No perinatal HIV-1 transmission from women with effective antiretroviral therapy starting before conception. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(11):1715–25. 10.1093/cid/civ578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sibiude J, Le Chenadec J, Mandelbrot L, et al. Update of Perinatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transmission in France: Zero Transmission for 5482 Mothers on Continuous Antiretroviral Therapy From Conception and With Undetectable Viral Load at Delivery. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):e590–8. 10.1093/cid/ciac703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wabwire-Mangen F, Gray RH, Mmiro FA, et al. Placental Membrane Inflammation and Risks of Maternal-to-Child Transmission of HIV-1 in Uganda. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;22(4):379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yeganeh N, Watts HD, Camarca M, et al. Syphilis in HIV-infected Mothers and Infants: Results from the NICHD/HPTN 040 Study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(3):e52. 10.1097/INF.0000000000000578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Seña AC, Zhang XH, Li T, et al. A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:479. 10.1186/s12879-015-1209-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Webster CM, Kasaro MP, Price JT, et al. Seroreduction of syphilis non-treponemal titers during pregnancy for women with and without HIV co-infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):427–34. 10.1002/ijgo.14131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Trivedi S, Williams C, Torrone E, Kidd S. National Trends and Reported Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women With Syphilis in the United States, 2012–2016. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):27–32. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Biadgo B, Hassen A, Getaneh M, et al. Syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus infections among pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic of Gondar family guidance association, Northwest Ethiopia: implication for prevention of mother to child transmission. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):27. 10.1186/s12978-019-0691-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Moura AA, de Mello MJG, Correia JB. Prevalence of syphilis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus infections and coinfections during prenatal screening in an urban Northeastern Brazilian population. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;39:10–5. 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Niama RF, Loukabou Bongolo NC, Bayonne Kombo ES, et al. Syphilis and HIV infections among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Republic of Congo. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28:8. 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.8.13097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Patterson S, Carter A, Nicholson V, et al. Condomless Sex Among Virally Suppressed Women With HIV With Regular HIV-Serodiscordant Sexual Partners in the Era of Treatment as Prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76(4):372–81. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Paula Marília Afonso Torres, Amanda Ribeiro de Paula Reis, Andressa Silva Torres dos Santos, Nádia Bruna da Silva Negrinho, Mayra Gonçalves Meneguiti, Elucir Gir. Factors associated with inadequate treatment of syphilis during pregnancy: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(6). 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.Gbadamosi SO, Itanyi IU, Menson WNA, et al. Targeted HIV testing for male partners of HIV-positive pregnant women in a high prevalence setting in Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0211022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0211022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pollahan A, Thinkhamrop J, Kongwattanakul K, Chaiyarach S, Sutthasri N, Lao-unka K. Rate of Couple HIV Testing in a Prenatal Care Clinic and Factors Associated with Refusal of Testing Among Male Partners. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2019;11:369–75. 10.2147/HIV.S232191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yee LM, Leziak K, Jackson J, Miller ES. Attitudes towards male partner HIV testing among low-income, minority pregnant women and their partners. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;25:100513. 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Parkes-Ratanshi R, Mbazira JK, Nakku-Joloba E, et al. Low male partner attendance after syphilis screening in pregnant women leads to worse birth outcomes; The Syphilis Treatment Of Partners (STOP) randomized controlled trial. Sex Health. 2020;17(3):214–22. 10.1071/SH19092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Balogun K, Slev PR. Towards achieving the end of the HIV epidemic: Advances, challenges and scaling-up strategies. Clin Biochem. 2023;117:53–9. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Clark M, Grobelna A. Rapid Syphilis Testing: Health Technology Update. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2022. Accessed September 10, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK602665/ [PubMed]
  • 78.Rodriguez PJ, Roberts DA, Meisner J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dual maternal HIV and syphilis testing strategies in high and low HIV prevalence countries: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(1):e61–71. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30395-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yin YP, Chen XS, Wei WH, et al. A Dual Point-of-Care Test Shows Good Performance in Simultaneously Detecting Nontreponemal and Treponemal Antibodies in Patients With Syphilis: A Multisite Evaluation Study in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(5):659–65. 10.1093/cid/cis928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bemelmans M, van den Akker T, Ford N, et al. Providing universal access to antiretroviral therapy in Thyolo, Malawi through task shifting and decentralization of HIV/AIDS care. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(12):1413–20. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cohen R, Lynch S, Bygrave H, et al. Antiretroviral treatment outcomes from a nurse-driven, community-supported HIV/AIDS treatment programme in rural Lesotho: observational cohort assessment at two years. J Int AIDS Soc. 2009;12:23. 10.1186/1758-2652-12-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Brandenburger D, Ambrosino E. The impact of antenatal syphilis point of care testing on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0247649. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Pai NP, Tulsky JP, Cohan D, Colford JM, Reingold AL. Rapid point-of-care HIV testing in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12(2):162–73. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.World Health Organization. Dual HIV/syphilis rapid diagnostic tests. Global Sexually Transmitted Infections Programme. 2024. Accessed July 10, 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/stis/testing-diagnostics/dual-hiv-syphilis-rapid-diagnostic-tests
  • 85.WHO. Dual HIV/Syphilis Rapid Diagnostic Tests Can Be Used as the First Test in Antenatal Care. World Health Organization; 2019. Accessed Nov 13, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-HIV-19.38
  • 86.UNAIDS. Laws and Policies Analytics | Home. Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM). 2023. Accessed Oct 30, 2023. https://lawsandpolicies.unaids.org/
  • 87.World Health Organization. New reduced costs of dual HIV/syphilis rapid tests to accelerate progress toward elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis. News. November 15, 2021. Accessed March 14, 2025. https://www.who.int/news/item/15-11-2021-new-reduced-costs-of-dual-hiv-syphilis-rapid-tests-to-accelerate-progress-toward-emtct-of-hiv-and-syphilis
  • 88.Zhang Y, Guy R, Camara H, et al. Barriers and facilitators to HIV and syphilis rapid diagnostic testing in antenatal care settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e009408. 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.WHO guideline on syphilis screening and treatment for pregnant women. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241550093 [PubMed]
  • 90.Department of Health and Human Services. Use of Antiretroviral Drugs to Prevent Perinatal HIV Transmission and Improve Health for Pregnant People | NIH. Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. January 31, 2024. Accessed Sep 3, 2024. https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/perinatal/recommendations-arv-drugs-pregnancy-prevent-hiv-improve-maternal-health
  • 91.World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Published online November 29, 2016. Accessed Sep 11, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912 [PubMed]
  • 92.World Health Organization. Pregnant and lactating women and girls. Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes. 2024. Accessed Sep 3, 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/populations/pregnant-and-lactating-women-and-girls
  • 93.Townsend CL, Byrne L, Cortina-Borja M, et al. Earlier initiation of ART and further decline in mother-to-child HIV transmission rates, 2000–2011. AIDS. 2014;28(7):1049–57. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gill MM, Hoffman HJ, Ndatimana D, et al. 24-month HIV-free survival among infants born to HIV-positive women enrolled in Option B+ program in Kigali, Rwanda. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(51):e9445. 10.1097/MD.0000000000009445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Myer L, Phillips TK, McIntyre JA, et al. HIV viraemia and mother-to-child transmission risk after antiretroviral therapy initiation in pregnancy in Cape Town. South Africa HIV Med. 2017;18(2):80–8. 10.1111/hiv.12397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Berman SM. Maternal syphilis: pathophysiology and treatment. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(6):433–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Alexander JM, Sheffield JS, Sanchez PJ, Mayfield J, Wendel GD. Efficacy of treatment for syphilis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(1):5–8. 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00338-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.World Health Organization. Elimination initiative of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B. Triple Elimination Initiative. 2024. Accessed Oct 25, 2024. https://www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-syphilis-and-hepatitis-b
  • 99.World Health Organization. Validation of eliminating of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B. Triple Elimination Initiative. 2024. Accessed Sep 11, 2024. https://www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation
  • 100.World Health Organization. Global Guidance On Criteria And Processes For Validation: Elimination Of Mother-To-Child Transmission Of Hiv, Syphilis And Hepatitis B Virus. WHO; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039360
  • 101.World Health Organization. Validation process & tools. Triple Elimination Initiative. 2024. Accessed Oct 25, 2024. https://www.who.int/initiatives/triple-elimination-initiative-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-hiv-syphilis-and-hepatitis-b/validation/process-and-tools
  • 102.Heath K, Alonso M, Aguilar G, et al. WHO method for estimating congenital syphilis to inform surveillance and service provision. Paraguay Bull World Health Organ. 2022;100(3):231–6. 10.2471/BLT.20.271569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Stanford KA, Mason J, Friedman E, Hazra A, Augustine E, Schneider J. An Opt-Out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(9):ofae490. 10.1093/ofid/ofae490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 104.Sabloak T, Yee LM, Feinglass J. Antepartum Emergency Department Use and Associations with Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Large Hospital System. Women’s Health Reports. 2023;4(1):562–70. 10.1089/whr.2023.0072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.South African National Department of Health. Guideline for the Prevention of Vertical Transmission of Communicable Infections (HIV, Hepatitis, Listeriosis, Malaria, Syphilis, and TB). Published online 2023. https://hivpreventioncoalition.unaids.org/en/resources/south-africa-guideline-vertical-transmission-prevention-communicable-infections
  • 106.Oyaro P, Kwena Z, Bukusi EA, Baeten JM. Is HIV Self-Testing a Strategy to Increase Repeat Testing Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women? A Pilot Mixed Methods Study. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndromes. 2020;84(4):365. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Otiso L, Alhassan Y, Odhong T, et al. Exploring acceptability, opportunities, and challenges of community-based home pregnancy testing for early antenatal care initiation in rural Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1–11. 10.1186/s12889-024-19254-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Tong H, Heuer A, Walker N. The impact of antibiotic treatment for syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhoea during pregnancy on birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04058. 10.7189/jogh.13.04058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mushamiri I, Belai W, Sacks E, Genberg B, Gupta S, Perry H. Evidence on the effectiveness of community-based primary health care in improving HIV/AIDS outcomes for mothers and children in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from a systematic review - PMC. J Global Health. 2021;10(11):11001. 10.7189/jogh.11.11001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mubiana-Mbewe M, Bosomprah S, Kadota JL, et al. Effect of Enhanced Adherence Package on Early ART Uptake Among HIV-Positive Pregnant Women in Zambia: An Individual Randomized Controlled Trial. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(3):992–1000. 10.1007/s10461-020-03060-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Aliyu MH, Blevins M, Audet CM, et al. Integrated prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission services, antiretroviral therapy initiation, and maternal and infant retention in care in rural north-central Nigeria: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet HIV. 2016;3(5):e202–11. 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)00018-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.World Health Organization. Updated recommendations on HIV prevention, infant diagnosis, antiretroviral initiation and monitoring. Published online March 17, 2021. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022232 [PubMed]
  • 113.Drain PK, Dorward J, Violette LR, et al. Point-of-care HIV viral load testing combined with task shifting to improve treatment outcomes (STREAM): findings from an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. The lancet HIV. 2020;7(4):e229. 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30402-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Dorward J, Sookrajh Y, Lessells R, et al. Point-of-Care Viral Load Testing to Manage HIV Viremia During the Rollout of Dolutegravir-Based ART in South Africa: A Randomized Feasibility Study (POwER). Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999). 2023;93(5):403. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 115.Nicholas S, Poulet E, Wolters L, et al. Point-of-care viral load monitoring: outcomes from a decentralized HIV programme in Malawi. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(8):e25387. 10.1002/jia2.25387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Althabe F, Chomba E, Tshefu AK, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve syphilis screening and treatment in pregnant women in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Lusaka, Zambia: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(5):e655–63. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30075-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Korte JE, Kisa R, Vrana-Diaz CJ, et al. HIV Oral Self-Testing for Male Partners of Women Attending Antenatal Care in Central Uganda: Uptake of Testing and Linkage to Care in a Randomized Trial. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;84(3):271. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Mutale W, Freeborn K, Graybill LA, et al. Addition of HIV self-test kits to partner notification services to increase HIV testing of male partners of pregnant women in Zambia: two parallel randomised trials. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(12):e1719–29. 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00393-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Pintye J, Drake AL, Begnel E, et al. Acceptability and outcomes of distributing HIV self-tests for male partner testing in Kenyan maternal and child health and family planning clinics. AIDS. 2019;33(8):1369. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Joseph Davey DL, Wall KM, Naidoo N, et al. HIV testing and linkage to ART following secondary distribution of HIV self-test kits to male partners of women living with HIV: a pilot randomized control trial in Mpumalanga, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(6):e25937. 10.1002/jia2.25937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Krakowiak D, Kinuthia J, Osoti AO, et al. Home-Based HIV Testing Among Pregnant Couples Increases Partner Testing and Identification of Serodiscordant Partnerships. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:S167. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Golden MR, Whittington WLH, Handsfield HH, et al. Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):676–85. 10.1056/NEJMoa041681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Jamison CD, Coleman JS, Mmeje O. Improving Women’s Health and Combatting Sexually Transmitted Infections Through Expedited Partner Therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):416–22. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hansman E, Mussa A, Ryan R, et al. Use of Expedited Partner Therapy for Pregnant Women Treated for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Gaborone, Botswana. Sex Transm Dis. 2024;51(5):331. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Spooner E, Govender K, Reddy T, et al. Point-of-care HIV testing best practice for early infant diagnosis: an implementation study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):731. 10.1186/s12889-019-6990-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.mothers2mothers | Healthy Women. Healthy Families. Healthier World. mothers2mothers. Accessed Oct 23, 2024. https://m2m.org/
  • 127.Herce ME, Chagomerana MB, Zalla LC, et al. Community-facility linkage models and maternal and infant health outcomes in Malawi’s PMTCT/ART program: A cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021;18(9):e1003780. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Shroufi A, Mafara E, Saint-Sauveur JF, Taziwa F, Viñoles MC. Mother to Mother (M2M) peer support for women in Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) programmes: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e64717. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Phiri S, Tweya H, van Lettow M, et al. Impact of Facility- and Community-Based Peer Support Models on Maternal Uptake and Retention in Malawi’s Option B+ HIV Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission Program: A 3-Arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (PURE Malawi). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(Suppl 2):S140–8. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zikusooka C, Kibuuka-Musoke D, Bwanika JB, et al. External Evaluation of the M2m Mentor Mother Model as Implemented under the STAR-EC Program in Uganda. Department of Programmes and Technical Support, mothers2mothers; 2014
  • 131.Arnold SR, Ford-Jones EL. Congenital syphilis: A guide to diagnosis and management. Paediatr Child Health. 2000;5(8):463. 10.1093/pch/5.8.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.World Health Organization. WHO publishes new Consolidated HIV guidelines for prevention, treatment, service delivery & monitoring. July 16, 2021. Accessed Oct 27, 2024. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-07-2021-who-publishes-new-consolidated-hiv-guidelines-for-prevention-treatment-service-delivery-monitoring
  • 133.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services for a changing epidemic. Published online November 27, 2019. Accessed Oct 27, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-HIV-19.31
  • 134.World Health Organization. Retest and treat: a review of national HIV retesting guidelines to inform elimination of mother‐to‐child HIV transmission efforts. Published online March 25, 2019. Accessed Oct 27, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/retest-and-treat-review-of-national-retesting-guidelines [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 135.Aloyce Z, Larson E, Komba A, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with intimate partner violence after HIV status disclosure among pregnant women with depression in Tanzania. AIDS Care. 2020;33(8):1009. 10.1080/09540121.2020.1799921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Shamu S, Zarowsky C, Shefer T, Temmerman M, Abrahams N. Intimate Partner Violence after Disclosure of HIV Test Results among Pregnant Women in Harare, Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e109447. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Hatcher AM, Romito P, Odero M, Bukusi EA, Onono M, Turan JM. Social context and drivers of intimate partner violence in rural Kenya: implications for the health of pregnant women. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(4):404–19. 10.1080/13691058.2012.760205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yonga AM, Kiss L, Onarheim KH. A systematic review of the effects of intimate partner violence on HIV-positive pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):220. 10.1186/s12889-022-12619-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Saweri OP, Batura N, Pulford J, et al. Investigating health service availability and readiness for antenatal testing and treatment for HIV and syphilis in Papua New Guinea. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):780. 10.1186/s12884-022-05097-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Dassah ET, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Mayaud P. Rollout of rapid point of care tests for antenatal syphilis screening in Ghana: healthcare provider perspectives and experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):130. 10.1186/s12913-018-2935-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bocoum FY, Tarnagda G, Bationo F, et al. Introducing onsite antenatal syphilis screening in Burkina Faso: implementation and evaluation of a feasibility intervention tailored to a local context. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):378. 10.1186/s12913-017-2325-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cheng J, Zhou H, Hong F, et al. Syphilis screening and intervention in 500 000 pregnant women in Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China - PMC. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(5):347–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.World Health Organization. Comprehensive Package of Care for Infants and Young Children Exposed to HIV: Policy Brief.; 2021
  • 144.Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports. 2015;64(RR-03):1 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 145.American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (8th Edition). 8th Edition.; 2017. 10.1542/9781610020886
  • 146.World Health Organization. Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants. Published online January 1, 2010. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599818
  • 147.Department of Health and Human Services. Initial Evaluation and Continued Monitoring of HIV During Pregnancy | NIH. Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy and Interventions to Reduce Perinatal HIV Transmission in the United States. January 31, 2024. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/perinatal/antepartum-care-initial-evaluation-monitoring-hiv-assessments-during-pregnancy
  • 148.Department of Health and Human Services, HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Panel on Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in adults and adolescents with HIV: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published online 2022. https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/adultand-adolescent-opportunistic-infection/
  • 149.World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on the diagnosis of HIV infection in infants and children. Published online January 1, 2010. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599085 [PubMed]
  • 150.Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Congenital Syphilis - STI Treatment Guidelines. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. 2021. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/congenital-syphilis.htm
  • 151.World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum (syphilis). Published online January 1, 2016. Accessed Oct 28, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549714 [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Current HIV/AIDS Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES