Table 2.
AI-driven climate models application and impacts on decision-making
| S/N | Climate actions | Models used | Performance | Impacts on decision-making | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monthly rainfall | ANN and ANFIS | ANFIS showed higher accuracy | It aided the meteorological stations in weather prediction and planning | (Abebe and Endalie 2023) |
| 2 | Pollutant and particle levels | Support Vector Regression (SVR) | Pollutants like CO, O3, and SO2 were predicted at 94.1% accuracy | The Environmental Protection Agency was able to plan with the data | (Castelli et al. 2020) |
| 3 | Earthquake | ANN and Random Forest | ANN model produced better earthquake depth, acceleration, and velocity accuracy | It is used in planning for the natural disaster and its influence on the environment | (Essam et al. 2021) |
| 4 | Origin of trace pollutants | Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM) | It provides high prediction accuracy and traces the significant sources of the pollutant | The result was used to control pollutant discharge and enhance the water quality | (Wang et al. 2019) |
| 5 | Forest fire | Classification and Regression Tree (CART) | The slope showed a substantial influence on forest fire occurrence | It assists in preparation for the forest fire occurrence | (Piao et al. 2022) |
| 6 | Projection of flue gas from waste-to-energy | ANN | The mean square error of the model validation constraints is between 0.003 and 0.19 | Findings from the study were used to make decisions in renewable energy planning | (Ma et al. 2023) |
| 7 | Quality of water for drinking | SVM and Logistic Regression | The models predicted the water quality at 98 and 92%, respectively | The data from this study assisted in expanding the scope of the task | (Panigrahi et al. 2023) |
| 8 | Changes in water level | Multi-layer Perception Neural Network (MLP-NN) | The models accurately predicted changes in water level with running time | It was assisted in planning for flooding | (Nur Adli Zakaria et al. 2021) |