Table 2.
Total agreements and Kappa coefficient among In-house ELISA and two commercially available serological assays.
| Type of anti-SARS-COV-2 assays compared | Kappa | (95% CI) | Total agreements (%) | (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
| In-house ELISA vs Elecsys CLIA | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 80.79 | 75 | 86.6 |
| In-house ELISA vs. Rapid LFA test (IgG + IgM) | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 75.79 | 70.1 | 81.5 |
| In-house ELISA vs. Rapid LFA test IgM only | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 68.25 | 62.6 | 73.9 |
| In-house ELISA vs. Rapid LFA test IgG only | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 78.95 | 73.2 | 84.7 |
| Rapid LFA test (IgG + IgM) vs Elecsys | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 86.24 | 80.5 | 92 |
| Elecsys CLIA vs. Rapid LFAtest IgM only | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 71.08 | 65.5 | 76.7 |
| Elecsys CLIA vs Rapid LFA test (IgG only) | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 89.4 | 83.2 | 94.8 |