Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug 31;102(37):13117–13122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504184102

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of conf-A (Left) and conf-B (Right) of the mutant E201Q bound to the substrate glutamine t-butyl ester. (Upper) Properties of the molecular surface. The charge potentials are calculated by using grasp (27) with a range of –20 to +20 kBT (where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is temperature in kelvin), colored from red to blue. The stick models for substrate and some active-site residues are colored white and green, respectively. The zinc ions are shown as yellow balls. Note that the different orientations of His-206 and Trp-207 in conf-A and conf-B result in the different active-site conformations and different substrate-binding modes. (Lower) A close-up view of the binding of glutamine t-butyl ester to the active site. The substrate and human QC residues are represented with a ball-and-stick model colored green and orange, respectively. The 2FoFc electron density maps (contoured at 1.0σ) for substrate are shown. Dotted lines in cyan and magenta depict the hydrogen bonds (distance is in Å) and coordination bonds, respectively.