Table 4.
The effects of Split feeding on the production performance.
Items | CON | TRT1 | TRT2 | SEM2 | P-value3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 7 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.656 |
Egg production, % | 83.1 | 82.3 | 81.8 | 0.7 | 0.487 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 943.7 | 902.5 | 899.8 | 12.2 | 0.257 |
FCR | 2.05 | 2.07 | 2.09 | 0.02 | 0.344 |
ADFI, g | 109.3 | 109.5 | 109.7 | 0.3 | 0.639 |
Week 8 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.310 |
Egg production, % | 82.3 | 81.4 | 80.7 | 0.9 | 0.478 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 953.8 | 910.1 | 914.5 | 13.1 | 0.193 |
FCR | 2.06 | 2.08 | 2.12 | 0.03 | 0.285 |
ADFI, g | 109.1 | 109.4 | 109.5 | 0.3 | 0.573 |
Week 9 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 2.4ab | 2.0b | 2.7a | 0.2 | 0.025 |
Egg production, % | 81.6 | 80.4 | 79.6 | 1.0 | 0.356 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 961.4 | 922.1 | 928.2 | 16.0 | 0.218 |
FCR | 2.08 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 0.03 | 0.355 |
ADFI, g | 108.9 | 109.1 | 109.4 | 0.7 | 0.887 |
Week 10 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 2.6ab | 2.1b | 2.8a | 0.2 | 0.043 |
Egg production, % | 80.8 | 79.5 | 78.5 | 0.7 | 0.118 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 973.4b | 932.1ab | 943.4a | 12.9 | 0.059 |
FCR | 2.10 | 2.12 | 2.18 | 0.03 | 0.323 |
ADFI, g | 108.8 | 109.1 | 109.3 | 0.6 | 0.829 |
Week 11 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 2.8a | 2.2b | 3.0a | 0.2 | 0.022 |
Egg production, % | 79.9a | 78.7ab | 77.4b | 0.8 | 0.114 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 984.7b | 942.5ab | 959.5a | 15.1 | 0.049 |
FCR | 2.11 | 2.14 | 2.20 | 0.03 | 0.138 |
ADFI, g | 108.7 | 109.0 | 109.3 | 0.7 | 0.843 |
Week 12 | |||||
Downgraded egg, % | 3.0a | 2.4b | 3.3a | 0.2 | 0.011 |
Egg production, % | 79.2a | 78.1ab | 76.5b | 0.7 | 0.024 |
Feed Cost (Won)/ Salable Egg Kg | 997.2b | 948.9b | 973.6a | 17.0 | 0.055 |
FCR | 2.13 | 2.15 | 2.23 | 0.03 | 0.132 |
ADFI, g | 108.6 | 108.9 | 109.2 | 1.0 | 0.901 |
Abbreviation: CON, Basal diet (one diet, conventional feeding with coarse limestone); TRT1, S100 (same nutrition density of day total consumption with control group, but different ratio of nutrients and particle size of limestone with split feeding; morning time fine limestone / afternoon time coarse limestone); TRT2, S95 (95 % nutrient density of ME and SID amino acid, 90 % density in available phosphorus and calcium of day- total consumption compared with basal diet; morning time fine limestone / afternoon time coarse limestone).
Standard error of means.
Means in the same row with different superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).