Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 24;15:14332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99447-1

Table 4.

Results of the study.

Hypothesis Parameter Estimate p-value C.R. Decision
H1 Altruistic value→ecocentric attitude 0.141 0.006 2.767 Supported
H2 Altruistic value→implicit attitude -0.073 0.08 -1.75 Rejected
H3 Biospheric value→ecocentric attitude 0.381 *** 7.693 Supported
H4 Biospheric value→implicit attitude 0.091 0.031 2.158 Supported
H5 Collectivistic value→ecocentric attitude 0.359 *** 7.270 Supported
H6 Collectivistic value→implicit attitude 0.166 *** 3.871 Supported
H7 Ecocentric attitude→awareness of consequence 0.405 *** 7.897 Supported
H8 Ecocentric attitude→implicit attitude 0.607 *** 11.888 Supported
H9 Awareness of consequence→ascription of responsibility 0.690 *** 14.954 Supported
H10 Ascription of responsibility→personal norm 0.814 *** 17.753 Supported
H11 Personal norm→intention 0.201 *** 5.679 Supported
H12 Implicit attitude→intention 0.473 *** 11.506 Supported
H13 Implicit attitude → perceived behavioural control 0.214 *** 5.079 Supported
H14 Subjective norm → intention 0.229 0.002 3.043 Supported
H15 Subjective norm→implicit attitude 0.168 *** 4.504 Supported
H16 Subjective norm→perceived behavioural control 0.764 *** 16.328 Supported
H17 Subjective norm→personal norm 0.214 *** 6.371 Supported
H18 Perceived behavioural control→intention 0.270 0.002 3.096 Supported