Table 1. Comparison of the Physical and Energetic Properties of CMOF-1, CMOF-2 ,and Other Selected Compounds^a.

Comp.	Nb [%]	ρc [g cm–3]	Tdd [°C]	OBCOe [%]	OBCO2f [%]	ISg [J]	FSh [N]	λi [nm]	tj [ms]	Ek [mJ]
CMOF-1	28.02	2.634	201	–14.0	–30.0	0.75	<5	808	1.14	11.4
CMOF-2	30.15	2.155l	267	–19.4	–40.6	0.5	5	808	0.15	1.5
CMOF-0	43.76	3.160	257	–25.1	–48.2	30	-	808	X	X
ATRZ	68.3	1.620	313	–58.5	–97.5	14	160	808	X	X
[Ag(ATCA)(ClO4)]nm	24.00	2.534	230	–4.6	–18.3	5	72	800	72.68	207
[Cu(N3)2(1-NET)]n	50.24	1.985	122	–18.3	–34.0	3	1	915	-	25.5
[Pb(OH-ATZ)2]no	34.4	3.180	284	–11.8	–19.7	10	50	800	5.22	27.0
CAp	56.90	2.600	205	–10.9	–10.9	<1	≤0.1	-	-	-
LAp	28.90	4.800	315	–5.5	–5.5	2.5–4	0.1–1	-	-	-
DDNPp	26.70	1.720	157	–15.2	–60.9	<1	24.7	-	-	-

^a“-” indicates that no data was obtained, and “X” indicates that it cannot be initiated by the laser.

^bNitrogen content.

^cDensity.

^dDecomposition temperature.

^eOxygen balance based on CO.

^fOxygen balance based on CO₂.

^gImpact sensitivity.

^hFriction sensitivity.

ⁱLaser wavelength.

^jLaser initiation delay time.

^kLaser initiation energy value.

^lCrystal density (223 K).

^mReference (53).

ⁿReference (58).

^oReference (54).

^pReference (59).