Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2002 Mar;40(3):1106–1108. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.3.1106-1108.2002

Unusual Outbreak of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Sheep Caused by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus

Alfonso Las Heras 1, Ana I Vela 1, Elena Fernández 1, Emilio Legaz 2, Lucas Domínguez 1, Jose F Fernández-Garayzábal 1,*
PMCID: PMC120234  PMID: 11880454

Abstract

This work describes an outbreak of clinical mastitis affecting 13 of 58 lactating ewes due to Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus was isolated in pure culture from all milk samples. All the clinical isolates had identical biochemical profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and also exhibited indistinguishable macrorestriction patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, indicating that all cases of mastitis were produced by a single strain.


Streptococci are probably the second group of microorganisms in importance, after staphylococci, responsible for mastitis in sheep (5). Although Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae are the species more frequently identified, other species of streptococci, such as Streptococcus parasanguinis, have been implicated in mammary gland infections (12). In this paper we describe an unusual outbreak of mastitis in sheep produced by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. This Lancefield group C streptococcus is part of the normal flora of the respiratory and urogenital tracts of equines, and it could be considered the most prevalent agent responsible for equine mastitis (17). It has also been implicated in sporadic cases of cattle and goat mastitis (9, 15, 20). However, to our knowledge, this is the first report of the association of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus with sheep mastitis.

An outbreak of clinical mastitis due to S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection was detected in a flock of 170 crossbred Awassi-Rubia de El Molar sheep. The animals were kept under extensive conditions, with at least 8 h per day of grazing in natural pastures during the whole year, and their diet was supplemented with alfalfa hay and commercial concentrates. The sheep had no contact with other animal species except for a male donkey used by the shepherd to transport his equipment. The ewes were housed in a barn during the night, and the hygiene conditions of the barn and the welfare of the animals were considered up to standard. The lambs were usually weaned at the age of 21 days. The ewes were hand milked twice daily by the same shepherd. The hygiene conditions for milking were not adequate. The shepherd never used gloves for milking and did not wash his hands between animals. No specific control measures against mastitis were taken. The outbreak involved 13 of 58 ewes in lactation (morbidity rate, 22%). Cases of mastitis were detected about 30 days after weaning, and they were clustered in 2 weeks after the first case was detected. No more cases of mastitis were further recorded. Mastitis was always unilateral. None of the affected ewes exhibited acute inflammation of the udder, and no systemic signs of illness were observed either. The milk secretion became watery, containing small flecks of pus. The average daily milk production of healthy ewes, ranging between 500 and 900 ml, decreased drastically in the affected mammary glands, which became dry 5 days after the onset of symptoms. The animals were treated intramuscularly with oxytetracycline (Terramicina-La; Pfizer) (two doses of 600 mg with a 3-day interval in between) without success. No ewe died, but none recovered milk secretion in the affected gland. The affected animals were prematurely dried off and sent to the slaughterhouse. Similar clinical courses and morbidity rates have been reported for cattle and goat mastitis caused by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus (9, 20).

Milk from the affected mammary glands was collected in sterile vials after disinfecting the teat end and kept under refrigeration during transportation to the laboratory for microbiological analysis. Milk samples were surface plated on Columbia blood agar (bio-Mérieux España, s.a.) and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 37°C. Pure cultures of hemolytic facultative anaerobic, gram-positive, catalase-negative cocci were isolated from all milk samples. The Lancefield group was determined by using the Slidex Strepto-kit (bio-Mérieux España, s.a.). The CAMP test with Staphylococcus aureus was also performed according to the recommendations of Quinn et al. (19). Biochemical identification was achieved using the commercial systems Rapid ID 32 Strep version 2.0 and API 20 Strep version 6.0 (bio-Mérieux España, s.a.). All the clinical isolates (SH1 to SH13) were of Lancefield group C, gave negative CAMP reactions, had identical biochemical profiles by both systems, and were identified as S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus. Quantitative detection of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus was determined (14) in three samples with counts ranging from 5.7 × 103 to 1.1 × 104 CFU/ml, suggesting a high excretion rate of this microorganism in milk. Susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton blood agar (Bio-Mérieux España, s.a.) following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (18). All the clinical isolates displayed identical zone diameters for penicillin (36 mm), amoxicillin (36 mm), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (35 mm), tetracycline (9 mm), streptomycin (12 mm), and gentamicin (10 mm). Resistance of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus to tetracycline has previously been reported (17) and could explain the lack of success of the antibiotic treatment. Based on the antimicrobial-susceptibility results, penicillin was recommended to treat future clinical cases, but new cases of clinical mastitis were not observed. Routine bacteriological surveys performed on this farm as described by Las Heras et al. (14) did not detect the existence of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus subclinical infections, neither before nor after the clinical outbreak. Mammary gland infections caused by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus have been named pseudoagalactia (9), because the clinical signs are similar to and could be confused with those observed in chronic contagious agalactia (6, 9). Detection of Mycoplasma in milk samples was achieved by conventional culture methods (13) and by an indirect immunoperoxidase technique (2) using monoclonal antibodies against the species responsible for contagious agalactia in small ruminants (6). All milk samples were negative for Mycoplasma, ruling out the implication of this pathogen in the outbreak.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a highly discriminatory typing technique that has been successfully applied to epidemiological investigation of this microorganism (3). All S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus isolates were molecularly characterized by PFGE according to the specifications of Vela et al. (23). The restriction enzymes ApaI (Promega Co.) and SmaI (MBI Fermentas) were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Both enzymes have been successfully applied in the molecular typing of streptococci (4, 10, 21). All the clinical isolates displayed indistinguishable banding patterns by PFGE with SmaI (data not shown) and ApaI (Fig. 1) restriction enzymes, indicating that all the clinical cases of mastitis were produced by a single strain. The PFGE results suggested the existence of a common source of infection.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Macrorestriction patterns with the restriction enzyme SmaI of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus isolates from five sheep with clinical mastitis. Lane 1, lambda ladder marker; lanes 2 to 6, clinical isolates SH1, SH3, SH5, SH7, and SH13.

Infections by this microorganism in animal species other than mares have been associated with hand milking, and the contact with horses was suspected to be the origin of the infection (7, 20, 22). In this outbreak a donkey present on the farm shared pastures with the ewes during grazing and was housed in their sheepfold. The donkey was apparently healthy, with no recent history of respiratory illness, and S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus is part of the normal flora of equine. Thus, its daily contact with the ewes may have allowed an opportunity for exposure to infection. Additionally, the fact that milking was done without proper hygiene conditions is a risk factor that may have contributed to the transmission of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus from the donkey to the mammary glands of ewes through the hands of the shepherd during milking, as well as to the spread of the infection among ewes. However, the implication of the donkey as the source of the infection could not be experimentally demonstrated because no specific investigation was done to corroborate this point. Whatever the origin, the microbiological, biochemical, and molecular data confirm that the mastitis outbreak was caused by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus. The shepherd was advised to improve both the hygiene procedures for milking and the housing and management of the donkey.

Our overall frequency of isolation of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus from clinical mastitis in small ruminants is about 4.7% of the isolates (A. Las Heras, unpublished data). Although the number of cases of mastitis due to this microorganism is lower than the number of cases produced by other bacterial species (5), the high morbidity rates, together with the decrease in milk production and the premature drying off of the animals, make mammary gland infections by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus a serious sanitary and economic problem. S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus is also responsible for various sporadic human infections such as bacteremia, meningitis, septicemia, or endophthalmitis (1, 16), as well as for outbreaks associated with the consumption of nonpasteurized milk or milk products (3, 8, 11). Thus, the excretion of this pathogen in milk represents for consumers of raw sheep milk products a health risk that should not be underestimated.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the AGF98-0829 project in response to the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture and by the Cooperativa Castellana de Ganaderos (Campo Real, Madrid). A. Las Heras and E. Fernández are recipients of a predoctoral grant assigned by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Albarracin, C., G. Rosencrance, J. Boland, and J. E. Hernandez. 1998. Bacteremia due to Streptococcus zooepidemicus associated with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. W. V. Med. J. 94:90-92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Albizu, I. 1998. Presencia de Mycoplasma bovis en la leche. Prevalencia en rebaños positivos al Test de California. Laboratorio Veterinario 10:23-26. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Balter, S., A. Benin, S. W. Pinto, L. M. Teixeira, G. G. Alvim, D. Luna Jackson, L. Laclaire, J. Elliot, R. Facklam, and A. Schuchat. 2000. Epidemic nephritis in Nova Serrana, Brazil. Lancet 355:1776-1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartie, K. L., M. J. Wilson, D. W. Williams, and M. A. Lewis. 2000. Macrorestriction fingerprinting of Streptococcus milleri group bacteria by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2141-2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bergonier, D., X. Berthelot, M. Romeo, A. Contreras, V. Coni, E. De Santis, S. Roselu, F. Barillet, G. Lagriffoul, and J. Marco. 1999. Fréquence des différents germes responsables de mammites cliniques et subcliniques chez les petits ruminants laitiers, p. 130-136. In F. Barillet and P. Zervas (ed.), Milking and milk production of dairy sheep and goats. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • 6.Bergonier, D., F. Poumarat, M. Pepin, P. Lebret, and X. Berthelot. 1996. Agalactie contagieuse des petits ruminants: clinique et épidemiologie. Le point vétérinaire 28:779-788. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bezek, D., and R. D. Walker. 1997. Additional cause of mastitis in a llama (Streptococcus zooepidemicus). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 210:748.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1983. Group C streptococcal infections associated with eating homemade cheese, New Mexico. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 32:510-516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Domínguez, L., J. L. Blanco, J. A. Ruíz Santa-Quiteria, C. Rupérez, and R. de la Fuente. 1989. Pseudoagalaxia caprina. Med. Vet. 5:637-640. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Douglas, V. L., S. G. Fenwick, D. U. Pfeiffer, N. B. Williamson, and C. W. Holmes. 2000. Genomic typing of Streptococcus uberis from cases of mastitis, in New Zealand dairy cows, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Vet. Microbiol. 75:27-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edwards, A. T., M. Roulson, and M. J. Ironside. 1988. A milk-borne outbreak of serious infection due to Streptococcus zooepidemicus (Lancefield group C). Epidemiol. Infect. 101:43-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fernández-Garayzábal, J. F., E. Fernández, A. Las Heras, C. Pascual, M. D. Collins, and L. Domínguez. 1998. Recognition of Streptococcus parasanguinis as new animal pathogen associated with asymptomatic mammary gland infections in sheep. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4:645-647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Greco, G., M. Corrente, V. Martella, and D. Buonavoglia. 2001. Diagnosis of contagious agalactia using a multiplex PCR, p. 134-136. In J. B. Poveda, A. Fernández, J. Frey, and K. E. Johansson (ed.), Mycoplasmas of ruminants: pathogenicity, diagnostics, epidemiology and molecular genetics, vol. 5. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Las Heras, A., L. Domínguez, and J. F. Fernández-Garayzábal. 1999. Prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in dairy ewes of Madrid region. Small Ruminant Res. 1720:1-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mallikeswaran, K., and V. D. Padmanaban. 1991. Microbial flora of milk of goats affected with clinical mastitis. Indian Vet. J. 68:152-154. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mattei, P., I. Beguinot, T. Malet, P. Evon, C. Lion, and B. Hoen. 1995. Meningitis, septicemia and endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus. Presse Méd. 24:1089.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McCue, P. M., and W. D. Wilson. 1989. Equine mastitis-a review of 28 cases. Equine Vet. J. 21:351-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  • 19.Quinn, P. J., M. E. Carter, B. Markey, and G. R. Carter. 1999. The streptococci and related cocci, p. 127-136. In P. J. Quinn, M. E. Carter, B. Markey, and G. R. Carter (ed.), Clinical veterinary microbiology. Mosby, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • 20.Sharp, M. W., M. J. Prince, and J. Gibbens. 1995. Streptococcus zooepidemicus infection and bovine mastitis. Vet. Rec. 137:128.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Swenshon, M., C. Lammer, and U. Siebert. 1998. Identification and molecular characterization of beta-hemolytic streptococci isolated from harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) of the north and Baltic Seas. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1902-1906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Timoney, J. F., J. H. Gillespie, F. W. Scott, and J. E. Barlough. 1988. The genus Streptococcus, p. 181-196. In J. F. Timoney, J. H. Gillespie, F. W. Scott, and J. E. Barlough (ed.), Hagan and Bruner's microbiology and infectious diseases of domestic animals, 8th ed. Cornell University Press, Cornell, N.Y.
  • 23.Vela, A. I., J. Vázquez, A. Gibello, M. M. Blanco, M. A. Moreno, P. Liébana, C. Albendea, B. Alcala, A. Méndez, L. Domínguez, and J. F. Fernández-Garayzábal. 2000. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of Lactococcus garvieae isolated in Spain from lactococcosis outbreaks and comparison with isolates of other countries and sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3791-3795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES