Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 24;25:597. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12629-5

Table 2.

Descriptive analysis of responses for each question

Question Answer n (%)
General
 4. Has a practice website? Yes 417 (85.80)
 5. Use of website? Never 17 (4.10)
For this study 15 (3.60)
Sometimes 198 (47.50)
Frequently 187 (44.80)
 6. Easy to find? Yes 413 (9.00)
Readability
 7. Font sufficiently large and clear? Good 390 (93.50)
Too small 27 (6.50)
 8. Simple, everyday language? Yes 412 (98.80)
Clarity
 9. Structured, well-organized lay-out? Yes 378 (90.60)
 10. Logical structure? Yes 380 (91.10)
 11. Finding the item? Yes 385 (92.30)
 12. Paragraphs, bold or colored words? Yes 294 (70.50)
 13. Useful? Yes 359 (86.10)
Cultural sensitivity
 14. Symbols? Yes 131 (31.40)
 15. Useful? Yes 301 (72.20)
 16. Change language? Yes 54 (12.90)
 17. Useful? Yes 283 (67.90)
Currentness and interactivity
 18. Up-to-date, actual? Yes 131 (31.40)
No 279 (66.90)
Don’t understand 7 (1.70)
 19. Useful? Yes 318 (76.30)
 20. Adapted to smartphone? Yes 310 (74.30)
No 76 (18.20)
No smartphone 31 (7.40)
 21. Online appointment tool? Yes 387 (92.80)
No 4 (1.00)
Don’t know how
Summary
 22. Sufficiently readable? Yes 402 (96.40)
 23. Sufficiently well-organized? Yes 380 (91.10)
 24. Sufficiently adapted to multicultural society? Yes 168 (40.30)
 25. Sufficiently accessible? Yes 346 (83.00)

Percentages are shown by the total number of respondents (n = 486). Starting at question 5, respondents whose practice did not have a website no longer answered, making n = 417. The numbering corresponds to the numbering of the questions in the questionnaire