Abstract
We have analyzed two variants of Drosophila melanogaster (RS and RE) which lead to the dual phenotype of elevated DDC activity and increased resistance to dietary alpha-methyldopa relative to Oregon-R controls. Both phenotypes show tight genetic linkage to the dopa decarboxylase, Ddc, and l(2)amd genes (i.e., < 0.05 cM distant). We find that low (Oregon-R), medium (RS) and high (RE and Canton-S) levels of DDC activity seen at both pupariation and eclosion in these strains are completely accounted for by differences in accumulation of DDC protein as measured by immunoprecipitation. Genetic reconstruction experiments in which Ddc + and amd+ gene doses are varied show that increasing DDC activity does not lead to a measurable increase in resistance to dietary alphamethyldopa. This suggests that the increased resistance to dietary alpha-methyldopa is not the result of increased DDC activity but, rather, results from increased l(2)amd+ activity. Both cytogenetic and molecular analyses indicate that these overproduction variants are not the result of small duplications of the Ddc and amd genes, nor are they associated with small (≥100 bp) insertions or deletions. Measurements of DDC activity in wild-type strains of Drosophila reveal a unimodal distribution of activity levels with the Canton-S and RE strains at the high end of the scale, the Oregon-R control at the low end and RS near the modal value. We conclude that accumulated changes in a genetic element (or elements) in close proximity to the Ddc+ and amd+ genes lead to the coordinated changes in the expression of the Ddc and amd genes in these strains.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Doane W. W., Treat-Clemons L. G., Gemmill R. M., Levy J. N., Hawley S. A., Buchberg A. M., Paigen K. Genetic mechanism for tissue-specific control of alpha-amylase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Isozymes Curr Top Biol Med Res. 1983;9:63–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgetts R. B. The response of dopa decarboxylase activity to variations in gene dosage in Drosophila: a possible location of the structural gene. Genetics. 1975 Jan;79(1):45–54. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laurie-Ahlberg C. C., Wilton A. N., Curtsinger J. W., Emigh T. H. Naturally occurring enzyme activity variation in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sources of variation for 23 enzymes. Genetics. 1982 Oct;102(2):191–206. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maniatis T., Fritsch E. F., Lauer J., Lawn R. M. The molecular genetics of human hemoglobins. Annu Rev Genet. 1980;14:145–178. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.14.120180.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh J. L., Gibbs P. D., Timmons P. M. Developmental control of transduced dopa decarboxylase genes in D. melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;198(3):393–403. doi: 10.1007/BF00332929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright T. R., Beermann W., Marsh J. L., Bishop C. P., Steward R., Black B. C., Tomsett A. D., Wright E. Y. The genetics of dopa decarboxylase in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The genetics and cytology of the 37B10-37D1 region. Chromosoma. 1981;83(1):45–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00286015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]