Skip to main content
Journal of Personalized Medicine logoLink to Journal of Personalized Medicine
. 2025 Mar 27;15(4):128. doi: 10.3390/jpm15040128

Genetic Polymorphisms in Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Involved in Vitamin D Metabolism and the Vitamin D Receptor: Their Clinical Relevance

Yazun Jarrar 1, Ghayda’ Alhammadin 2, Su-Jun Lee 3,*
Editor: Werner Schroth
PMCID: PMC12028346  PMID: 40278307

Abstract

Individual variations in the active form of vitamin D (Vit.D) arise from a combination of dietary intake, sun exposure, and genetic factors, making it complex and challenging to maintain optimal levels. Among Vit.D-related genes, variations in CYP2R1 and CYP27B1 influence Vit.D synthesis, CYP24A1 regulates its inactivation, and the Vit.D receptor (VDR) mediates Vit.D signaling. These genetic variations contribute to substantial differences in Vit.D concentrations and associated clinical effects. However, there has been a lack of comprehensive, simultaneous exploration of these key genes and their clinical implications. This review provides a systematic analysis of genetic variants in Vit.D-related P450 genes identified in human clinical studies, along with in silico predictions of their functional consequences. Since multiple genes seem to influence the body’s response to Vit.D, studying just one genetic variant may not fully explain Vit.D deficiency. A comprehensive evaluation of all Vit.D-related genes could offer valuable insights for advancing personalized medicine in Vit.D management. This study provides a foundation for developing a more personalized approach to Vit.D supplementation and regulation, guided by genetic information.

Keywords: vitamin D, vitamin D metabolism, genetic variants, vitamin D receptor, human diseases, single-nucleotide variants, cytochrome P450s

1. Introduction

Vitamin D (Vit.D) plays a critical role in calcium absorption and homeostasis and has been extensively studied in the context of bone density and skeletal health. However, emerging evidence has expanded its relevance to a broader range of physiological and pathological processes, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune disorders, cancer, and depression [1]. Inter-individual variation in circulating 25-hydroxyVit.D (25-OH Vit.D) levels exceeds a 30-fold range [2], driven by multiple factors such as sun exposure, dietary intake, age, sex, pharmacological interactions, disease status, and genetic predisposition [3]. Among these, genetic factors contribute significantly to variability in 25-OH Vit.D levels, accounting for an estimated 23–83% of the observed differences [4,5]. Notably, genes involved in Vit.D metabolism, including those regulating its biosynthesis and clearance, have been identified as major determinants of inter-individual variation [6]. For instance, polymorphisms in CYP27B1 and CYP2R1 have been implicated in calcium-related disorders such as Vit.D-dependent rickets type 1 (VDDR1) [7,8,9]. Furthermore, genetic variants in CYP2R1, CYP24A1, and Vit.D receptors (VDRs) have been associated with altered circulating 25-OH Vit.D concentrations in a gene-dependent manner [4,10]. Specifically, mutations in CYP24A1 have been linked to dysregulated Vit.D metabolism and hypercalcemia [11]. The biological impact of genetic variants is highly diverse, ranging from complete loss-of-function mutations that abolish enzymatic activity to neutral polymorphisms with no discernible effect on gene function or expression [12]. Functional consequences of genetic variants include amino acid substitutions leading to altered protein function, premature stop codons resulting in truncated proteins, splicing variants that modify mRNA length and stability, frame-shift mutations caused by nucleotide insertions or deletions leading to premature termination codons, and regulatory variants that influence gene expression levels [13]. A comprehensive understanding of the functional consequences of these genetic variants remains limited, making it challenging for clinicians and patients to accurately address Vit.D deficiency based on genotyping a limited set of variants, often relying on assumptions or statistical predictions. To ensure optimal Vit.D levels, it is more reliable and clinically beneficial to genotype for well-characterized functional variants or those previously validated in human studies. Importantly, Vit.D deficiency may result from non-genetic factors such as drug interactions, hepatic or renal impairment, or insufficient sun exposure, leading to potential misclassification as a genetic disorder [6]. Conversely, mutations in genes involved in Vit.D biosynthesis may obscure the phenotypic manifestation of other genetic variants associated with Vit.D deficiency, complicating accurate diagnosis due to overlapping environmental or clinical factors, as well as interactions with other Vit.D-related genetic variants. This uncertainty has led to reported hesitancy among both clinicians and patients regarding the clinical utility of genotyping in this context [14]. In this review, we examine the functional roles of Vit.D-related genetic variants that have been experimentally characterized. Furthermore, we summarize the genetic variants that exhibit strong associations with human diseases and emphasize the need for further investigation into uncharacterized variants through in silico analyses and functional validation studies.

2. Vitamin D

Vit.D is an essential fat-soluble secosteroid required for maintaining calcium and phosphate homeostasis, thereby ensuring proper bone mineralization, muscle function, and various cellular processes. First identified by McCollum et al. in 1922, Vit.D was hypothesized to facilitate calcium deposition, and subsequent studies demonstrated its role in preventing rickets, a metabolic disorder characterized by defective bone mineralization due to impaired calcium and phosphate metabolism [15]. It was later established that both sunlight exposure and dietary sources, such as cod liver oil, could prevent and treat rickets by increasing Vit.D levels [16]. Genetic mutations affecting Vit.D metabolism, as well as dietary deficiencies, have been identified as primary contributors to this disorder [17]. Vit.D exists in two primary forms: Vit.D3 (cholecalciferol), primarily derived from animal sources, and Vit.D2 (ergocalciferol), obtained from plant and fungal sources. In 1924, Steenbock and colleagues at the University of Wisconsin demonstrated that irradiating yeast enhanced its Vit.D2 content, leading to the fortification of milk as a strategy to prevent rickets [18]. Structurally, Vit.D is classified as a secosteroid, sharing a core four-ring backbone typical of steroidal compounds, with a characteristic broken ring structure (Figure 1). Both Vit.D2 and Vit.D3 are biologically inactive and require sequential hydroxylation, first at the 25th carbon in the liver and then at the 1st carbon in the kidneys, to produce the active hormone calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyVit.D). Calcitriol plays a pivotal role in regulating calcium and phosphate metabolism, thereby contributing to skeletal integrity, immune function, and various physiological processes [19].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The structure of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3. The structures were obtained from the NCBI database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

3. The Metabolism and Bioactivity of Vit.D

Humans obtain Vit.D through two primary sources: endogenous synthesis of Vit.D3 in the skin upon exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation and exogenous intake from dietary sources, fortified foods, and supplements. Cutaneous synthesis accounts for approximately 90% of total Vit.D production, while dietary sources, including egg yolks, oily fish, shiitake mushrooms, organ meats, and liver, contribute to the remaining fraction [20]. Upon exposure to UVB radiation (wavelength 290–315 nm), the precursor molecule 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC), present in the epidermal cells, undergoes photochemical conversion to pre-Vit.D3. Subsequent thermal isomerization results in the formation of Vit.D3. Similarly, Vit.D2 is derived from plant and fungal sources through a comparable process. However, both Vit.D3 and Vit.D2 are biologically inactive and require enzymatic activation through sequential hydroxylation. As illustrated in Figure 2, the first hydroxylation occurs in the liver, where the enzyme CYP2R1 catalyzes the conversion of Vit.D into 25-hydroxyVit.D [25(OH)D], also referred to as calcidiol. This metabolite, the primary circulating form of Vit.D, has a half-life of approximately two weeks and serves as a biomarker for assessing Vit.D status [21]. The second hydroxylation step occurs predominantly in the kidneys, where the enzyme CYP27B1 catalyzes the conversion of 25(OH)D into its biologically active form, 1,25-dihydroxyVit.D [1,25(OH)2D], also known as calcitriol. This conversion is tightly regulated by parathyroid hormone (PTH) in response to serum calcium and phosphate levels, as well as other mediators such as growth hormone (GH) [22]. Beyond renal hydroxylation, extra-renal tissues—including keratinocytes, osteoblasts, lymph nodes, placenta, colon, and alveolar macrophages—express CYP27B1, enabling local conversion of 25(OH)D into 1,25(OH)2D. This suggests an autocrine–paracrine role for calcitriol in various physiological processes [21]. In murine models, CYP2R1 knockout results in a significant (>50%) reduction in circulating 25(OH)D levels, although complete depletion does not occur, indicating the presence of alternative metabolic pathways. In humans, mutations in CYP2R1 and CYP27B1 have been implicated in hereditary rickets, further underscoring their critical role in Vit.D metabolism [23]. Additionally, CYP3A4, an enzyme primarily involved in xenobiotic metabolism, contributes to Vit.D catabolism by hydroxylating calcitriol, thereby reducing its biological activity and facilitating its degradation. This enzymatic regulation plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance between active and inactive forms of Vit.D, particularly in extra-renal tissues [24]. Furthermore, CYP27A1, a mitochondrial enzyme predominantly expressed in the liver, hydroxylates 25(OH)D at the 24-position, leading to the formation of 24,25-dihydroxyVit.D, an inactive metabolite. This catabolic pathway serves as a protective mechanism against Vit.D toxicity and plays a key role in calcium homeostasis [25].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The metabolism and activation pathway of vitamin D. Vitamin D can be obtained from the diet or synthesized in the skin from 7-dehydrocholesterol upon UVB sunlight exposure. In the liver, vitamin D is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the major circulating form, via CYP2R1. This is transported in the blood bound to vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) and further hydroxylated in the kidney by CYP27B1 to form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], the active form. Active vitamin D binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR) to regulate calcium and phosphate homeostasis and mediate various cellular effects. Excess vitamin D is inactivated by CYP24A1, which converts it into the metabolites 1,24,25(OH)3D for excretion.

4. Vit.D Receptor

Vit.D-binding protein (VDBP), a member of the albumin superfamily, plays a crucial role in the transport and distribution of Vit.D metabolites. Approximately 85% of circulating 25-hydroxyVit.D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyVit.D [1,25(OH)2D] are bound to VDBP, facilitating their delivery to target tissues. However, studies have shown that the absence of VDBP does not necessarily result in Vit.D deficiency unless dietary intake is severely restricted, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanisms for Vit.D homeostasis [26]. The biological actions of Vit.D are mediated through the activation of the cytosolic Vit.D receptor (VDR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Acting as a hormone, 1,25(OH)2D binds to VDR and translocates into the nucleus of target cells, where it regulates gene transcription. The ubiquitous expression of VDR across various tissues underscores the extensive physiological functions of Vit.D. It is estimated that 1,25(OH)2D directly or indirectly modulates the expression of approximately 1250 genes by binding to VDR and interacting with Vit.D response elements (VDREs) in promoter regions, thereby activating or repressing transcription [27]. Structurally, VDR shares common features with other nuclear receptors, including a DNA-binding domain, a ligand-binding domain, a highly conserved N-terminal domain of 23 amino acids, and a flexible hinge region. Upon activation, VDR typically forms a heterodimer with one of the three retinoid X receptor (RXR) isoforms (α, β, or γ), enhancing its transcriptional activity [28]. Given its pivotal role in gene regulation, dysregulation of VDR signaling has been implicated in a range of pathological conditions, including rickets, psoriasis, renal osteodystrophy, and several autoimmune disorders such as type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease [29,30].

5. Biological Functions of Vit.D

Vit.D exerts a broad range of well-documented biological functions. The active metabolite, 1,25-dihydroxyVit.D [1,25(OH)2D], works in concert with parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin to regulate calcium and phosphorus homeostasis. This regulation is achieved through enhanced intestinal absorption of these minerals, stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption, and reduced renal excretion, thereby maintaining skeletal integrity and bone mineralization. Beyond its classical role in calcium–phosphorus metabolism, the widespread expression of VDR in various cell types—including keratinocytes, lymphocytes, pancreatic β-cells, and cells of the pituitary and parathyroid glands—suggests additional biological functions for Vit.D [31]. Vit.D is a key regulator of cellular proliferation and differentiation, influencing multiple cell-specific processes such as cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and differentiation. Notably, 1,25(OH)2D has been implicated in cell cycle arrest at the G0-G1 phase, thereby exerting antiproliferative effects [32]. In one study, the Vit.D analog EB1089 was shown to induce the expression of differentiation-associated epithelial genes, promoting differentiation and reversing the malignant phenotype of squamous cell carcinoma. Additionally, EB1089 inhibited the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling pathway, thereby inducing apoptosis in breast cancer cells [32]. Vit.D also functions as a potent immunomodulatory hormone. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that 1,25(OH)2D exerts immunoregulatory effects on both innate and adaptive immune responses, which can be attributed to VDR expression in immune cells and their ability to metabolize Vit.D [33]. Vit.D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of immune-mediated disorders, including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, sepsis, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and respiratory tract infections [34]. In response to bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, inflammatory cytokines such as interferon-γ and Toll-like receptor activation stimulate macrophages and monocytes to upregulate CYP27B1 expression. This leads to the local conversion of 25(OH)D to its active form, 1,25(OH)2D, which subsequently induces the synthesis of cathelicidin, an endogenous antimicrobial peptide that disrupts microbial membranes and enhances host defense mechanisms [35]. Furthermore, 1,25(OH)2D modulates the function of antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells, by promoting the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, thereby contributing to immune tolerance [36]. Several studies have also demonstrated that 1,25(OH)2D directly influences B-cell function in a manner similar to its effects on T cells. Resting B cells exhibit low VDR expression, which increases upon activation. In its active state, 1,25(OH)2D inhibits the differentiation of plasma and memory B cells, induces apoptosis in activated B cells, and promotes the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, thereby modulating humoral immunity [37].

6. Vit.D Deficiency and Its Link to Human Diseases

Due to its long half-life and relatively stable serum concentration, independent of PTH fluctuations, the serum level of 25-hydroxyVit.D [25(OH)D] is widely used as a reliable biomarker for assessing whole-body Vit.D status. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Office of Dietary Supplements, optimal serum 25(OH)D levels are defined as >20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), while Vit.D deficiency is diagnosed when serum 25(OH)D levels fall below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L) [38]. Vit.D deficiency may arise due to inadequate dietary intake, insufficient sun exposure, malabsorption disorders, or conditions that impair the metabolic activation of Vit.D. Furthermore, several factors influence the risk of Vit.D deficiency, including age, lifestyle, ethnicity, breastfeeding status, geographic latitude, skin pigmentation, and genetic polymorphisms in Vit.D-related genes [39]. Across various regions of the world, Vit.D deficiency remains highly prevalent. Epidemiological studies indicate that more than 20% of the population in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Jordan, and Tunisia exhibit serum 25(OH)D levels below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L) [40]. A survey revealed that 50% of pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates, 59% of healthy schoolchildren in Saudi Arabia, and 83% of women in Nigeria are Vit.D deficient [41]. A cohort study conducted in Jordan involving 3,007 participants reported that 40.17% were Vit.D deficient, 27.7% had insufficient levels, 17.02% had adequate levels, and only 15.11% had optimal Vit.D levels [42]. Despite high levels of sunlight exposure in both summer and winter, Vit.D deficiency is widespread across Africa and the Middle East. This paradox may be attributed to factors such as sun-avoidant behaviors, traditional clothing that limits skin exposure, dietary restrictions influenced by cultural practices, and genetic variations in Vit.D metabolism [41]. Vit.D deficiency has been strongly associated with various adverse health outcomes, including increased all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis conducted in 2017, encompassing over 17,000 participants, demonstrated a significant correlation between low 25(OH)D levels and elevated mortality risk [43]. Additionally, critically ill patients with sepsis often present with low Vit.D levels. Administration of a single intravenous bolus dose of 400,000 IU of cholecalciferol in the early stages of sepsis has been shown to reduce pro-inflammatory interleukin levels while increasing cathelicidin, an antimicrobial peptide with endotoxin-neutralizing properties [44]. Emerging evidence also suggests that Vit.D deficiency is associated with pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, low birth weight, and gestational diabetes. Rostami et al. recommend a maintenance dose of 400–600 IU/day of Vit.D supplementation during pregnancy when serum 25(OH)D levels are below 40 ng/mL [45]. Moreover, numerous clinical studies have identified a link between Vit.D deficiency and cardiovascular disorders, including coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, and hypertension [46]. It is well established that seasonal influenza outbreaks predominantly occur in winter. One proposed explanation is the seasonal fluctuation in serum 25(OH)D levels due to variations in UV light exposure [47]. Several studies have substantiated this hypothesis, demonstrating that Vit.D deficiency increases susceptibility to acute viral respiratory tract infections in both children and adults [48]. According to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States, which included 14,108 participants, individuals with serum 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL had a 58% higher risk of developing acute respiratory infections than those with higher Vit.D levels [48]. Respiratory viruses cause cellular and tissue damage upon entry into the respiratory epithelium, triggering both innate and adaptive immune responses that lead to inflammation and, in severe cases, sepsis, which may be life-threatening [49]. A meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials demonstrated that Vit.D3 or D2 supplementation significantly reduces the risk of acute respiratory infections [50].

7. Genetic Variants in Genes Related to Vit.D Metabolism and Signaling

Genetic variants can influence gene regulation, transcription, and protein structure and function, depending on their location within the gene [51]. These variations play a crucial role in explaining inter-individual differences in various phenotypes, including susceptibility to Vit.D deficiency [52]. In this review, we focus on key genes involved in Vit.D metabolism, including Vit.D-activating enzymes CYP2R1 and CYP27B1, the Vit.D-inactivating enzyme CYP24A1, and the VDR.

7.1. VDR Genetic Variants

The VDR gene, located on chromosome 12q13.11, encodes the Vit.D receptor, a nuclear transcription factor that mediates the biological effects of 1,25(OH)2D. Upon activation, VDR heterodimerizes with the retinoid X receptor RXR, forming the VDR/RXR complex, which binds to VDREs in the promoter regions of target genes, thereby regulating their transcription [51].

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the VDR gene have been implicated in reduced Vit.D activity and are associated with various diseases. Among these, the rs7975232 (ApaI), rs2228570 (FokI), rs731236 (TaqI), and rs1544410 (BsmI) polymorphisms are the most extensively studied [51]. ApaI (rs7975232) and BsmI (rs1544410) are located within intron 8 of the VDR gene, while FokI (rs2228570) and TaqI (rs731236) are situated in exon 2 and exon 9, respectively. The rs2228570 and rs731236 polymorphisms may influence translation and alter VDR protein structure, whereas rs7975232 and rs1544410 have been associated with mRNA stability and reduced gene expression, ultimately leading to decreased VDR activity and impaired Vit.D function [52].

Numerous studies across different populations have explored the relationship between VDR polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A meta-analysis of 21 studies published before February 2020 found that the rs2228570 polymorphism exhibited a protective effect against RA in both European and Asian populations, whereas rs731236 conferred a lower risk of RA among Africans and Arabs. However, rs1544410 was not significantly associated with RA risk in any population [53]. Another meta-analysis, including 17 studies, examined the association between VDR polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility. This study identified a statistically significant link between the wild-type rs2228570 and homozygous rs731236 genotypes and asthma susceptibility. Furthermore, the study suggested that ethnic background influences asthma risk, with higher susceptibility observed among American, Asian, and African populations [54].

Several studies have also investigated the role of VDR polymorphisms in tuberculosis (TB) susceptibility across diverse ethnic groups. A systematic review of six studies conducted in the Iranian population reported that rs731236 was significantly associated with increased TB risk across all genetic models, while rs1544410 was linked to an elevated TB risk only in the dominant genotype model. Conversely, rs2228570 and rs7975232 did not show significant associations with TB progression in this population [55]. In addition, a meta-analysis of nine genetic studies published before 2017 examined the association between VDR polymorphisms (rs11568820, rs2228570, rs731236, and rs1544410) and resistance to enveloped viral infections, including Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Dengue virus. The findings indicated that rs2228570 was consistently associated with increased susceptibility to RSV infection, and a global pattern was observed between RSV incidence and the distribution of rs2228570 alleles, suggesting its potential role as a genetic marker contributing to RSV transmission [54].

In the context of COVID-19, a study conducted in Iran genotyped eight VDR polymorphisms (rs7975232, rs1544410, rs731236, rs2228570, rs757343, rs739837, and rs11568820) in 500 hospitalized patients using the PCR-RFLP method. The study reported that rs7975232 was associated with shortness of breath; rs2228570 with high fever and hypertension; rs1544410 with chronic kidney disease; and rs757343 with hypertension, vomiting, and respiratory distress in mild to moderately ill patients [56]. A separate study in Turkey examined the relationship between VDR polymorphisms (rs2228570, rs7975232, rs731236, and rs1544410) and COVID-19 prognosis using genetic data from 297 COVID-19 patients in the Marmara University Medical Genetics Biobank. The study found that 83% of participants had Vit.D deficiency, with 40.7% exhibiting severe deficiency. Notably, 62.8% of ICU-admitted patients carried the TT genotype of rs731236, highlighting a potential link between this variant and severe COVID-19 outcomes [57]. More recently, Alhammadin et al. (2023) investigated the relationship between VDR gene variants (rs7975232, rs2228570, and rs731236) and COVID-19 severity as well as long-COVID symptoms in 100 Jordanian patients. While rs7975232 and rs2228570 were not significantly associated with disease severity, rs731236 was significantly linked to milder disease courses, with the wild-type genotype associated with mild illness and the heterozygous genotype predominantly found in asymptomatic individuals. Regarding long-COVID symptoms, the heterozygous rs7975232 and wild-type rs731236 genotypes were associated with persistent fatigue and muscle pain, while the homozygous rs731236 genotype was strongly correlated with prolonged respiratory distress [58].

7.2. Genetic Variants in Genes Related to Vit.D Metabolism

The CYP2R1 gene plays a pivotal role in the Vit.D metabolic pathway. Located on chromosome 11p15.2, this gene spans approximately 15.5 kb and encodes a 501-amino-acid enzyme, 25-hydroxylase, which catalyzes a rate-limiting step in the hepatic conversion of pre-Vit.D into its bioactive form, 25(OH)D [18]. Notably, polymorphisms in CYP2R1, such as rs10741657, rs12794714, and rs10766197, have been implicated in modulating 25(OH)D concentrations, likely through alterations in gene expression or enzymatic activity [59]. Several studies have investigated the functional impact of these polymorphisms. A meta-analysis involving 52,417 healthy participants demonstrated that the rs10741657 variant is significantly associated with lower 25(OH)D levels and an increased risk of Vit.D deficiency under a dominant model (GG + AG vs. AA), particularly among European and Asian populations (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.11–1.83, P = 0.006) [60]. Additionally, a cross-sectional study of 180 patients in Virginia reported that carriers of the rs10741657 risk allele exhibited a 3.7-fold higher likelihood of Vit.D insufficiency [61]. Another study in individuals with metabolic syndrome identified the G/G homozygous genotype of rs10741657 as being associated with reduced serum Vit.D3 levels [62].

The CYP27A1 gene, located on chromosome 2q35, spans approximately 18.6 kb and consists of nine exons and eight introns [63]. Together with CYP2R1 and CYP3A4, CYP27A1 encodes enzymes involved in the 25-hydroxylation of Vit.D in the liver, a critical step in the biosynthesis of 25(OH)D [7]. Although CYP2R1 exhibits high affinity and specificity for Vit.D, CYP27A1 and CYP3A4 demonstrate broader substrate specificity but a lower affinity for Vit.D metabolism [64]. Among the studied CYP27A1 polymorphisms, rs17470271 and rs933994 have been evaluated for their role in Vit.D metabolism [65]. However, their clinical significance remains unclear. A study on pulmonary tuberculosis in a Chinese cohort found no significant association between these variants and Vit.D-related outcomes, suggesting that CYP27A1 genetic variability alone may not be a primary determinant of Vit.D status [66]. Furthermore, recent research suggests that CYP27A1 polymorphisms may exert a weaker influence on circulating 25(OH)D levels compared to polymorphisms in CYP2R1 [67].

The CYP27B1 gene, located on chromosome 12q14.1, encodes 1-alpha-hydroxylase, a mitochondrial cytochrome P450 enzyme of 508 amino acids, which catalyzes the final activation step of Vit.D by converting 25(OH)D to its biologically active form calcitriol [68]. This hydroxylation occurs primarily in the kidneys and is crucial for Vit.D–mediated calcium homeostasis and immune regulation. The CYP27B1 gene consists of nine exons and encodes an enzyme integral to renal Vit.D activation [69]. Several key CYP27B1 polymorphisms, including rs10877012 and rs4646536, have been linked to altered Vit.D levels and associated health outcomes [70]. In a Canadian cohort, rare variants such as rs118204009 (G/A), rs118204011 (C/T), and rs118204012 (A/G) were found to correlate with lower Vit.D levels and conditions such as VDDT1 rickets. Specifically, individuals homozygous for the rs118204012 (AA) genotype exhibited a significantly increased risk of Vit.D insufficiency, particularly among males [71].

Further research has explored the association between CYP27B1 polymorphisms and autoimmune diseases. The rs10877012 polymorphism has been reported to influence serum calcidiol levels, potentially modulating immune responses in disorders such as multiple sclerosis, RA, and systemic lupus erythematosus. This suggests that genetic variations in CYP27B1 may impact Vit.D metabolism and immune function, indicating the gene’s role in disease susceptibility and Vit.D homeostasis [72]. Additionally, a study on Iranian populations revealed a significant association between the rs4646536 variant and Vit.D deficiency, with carriers displaying a markedly higher risk of Vit.D insufficiency [70].

7.3. Genetic Variants in Vit.D-Inactivation Gene

The CYP24A1 gene, located on chromosome 20q13.2, encodes 24-hydroxylase, a mitochondrial enzyme essential for the inactivation of Vit.D [73]. This enzyme catalyzes the 24-hydroxylationof 1,25(OH)2D, converting it into calcitroic acid, an inactive metabolite that is subsequently excreted, thereby tightly regulating Vit.D homeostasis [74]. CYP24A1 is highly expressed in the kidney and plays a crucial role in increasing the solubility of Vit.D metabolites for renal clearance [75,76]. Several SNPs in CYP24A1, including rs2248137, rs2296241, and rs927650, have been associated with circulating Vit.D levels and disease susceptibility [77,78]. One study reported a significant association between the rs2248137 variant and multiple sclerosis risk, showing that MS patients carrying the CC genotype had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to individuals with the GG or CG genotypes [64]. In addition, CYP24A1 polymorphisms have been implicated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and Vit.D deficiency. A study identified a strong correlation between the rs2296241 and rs2248359 variants and reduced serum Vit.D levels, suggesting that genetic variations in CYP24A1 may contribute to impaired Vit.D metabolism in patients with NAFLD [79]. Further research has explored the role of CYP24A1 variants in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). A study in a German cohort found that specific CYP24A1 haplotypes, such as rs2248137C/rs2296241G, were significantly associated with lower circulating 1,25(OH)2D₃ levels in DTC patients compared to healthy controls [80]. These findings suggest that genetic variants in CYP24A1 may contribute to alterations in Vit.D metabolism, hence influencing the risk and progression of certain diseases.

8. In Silico Analysis of Genetic Variants Related to Vit.D Metabolism and Signaling

We conducted an in silico evaluation, which refers to computational simulations and bioinformatics tools used to analyze biological data of nonsynonymous genetic variants in key human Vit.D-related genes—CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, and VDR—identified in the clinical variant database of GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ accessed on August 2024). The analyzed genetic variants, using in silico tools, are genetic variants with unknown or uncertain functionality on human Vit.D deficiency. The analysis utilized widely adopted computational prediction tools, PolyPhen-2 and Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT), to assess the potential functional impact of these variants. PolyPhen-2 predicts the potential impact of amino acid substitutions by analyzing sequence conservation and structural changes within the protein. It assigns scores based on the likelihood of a variant affecting protein function [81]. Similarly, SIFT evaluates evolutionary conservation, determining whether an amino acid substitution is likely to be tolerated or damaging based on sequence homology and amino acid properties [82].

The results for CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, and VDR variants are summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. Notably, the functional consequences of many of these variants remain uncharacterized in vitro and clinically. The in silico assessment of CYP2R1 nonsynonymous variants (Table 1) revealed a broad spectrum of predicted functional effects. Variants such as Pro36Leu (107C>T), Pro41Thr (121C>A), Ile332Thr (995T>C), Leu300Arg (899T>G), Gly450Arg (1348G>C), and Arg248Ser (744A>C) were predicted to be deleterious by both tools. PolyPhen-2 assigned scores approaching or equal to 1.0, suggesting a high likelihood of pathogenicity, while SIFT classified them as “not tolerated.” These substitutions likely disrupt protein structure or function, as they occur at residues critical for enzymatic activity or stability. Conversely, several variants were consistently predicted to be benign. For instance, Glu8Lys (22G>A), Arg67Lys (200G>A), and Thr402Ile (1205C>T) were classified as having minimal or no impact on protein function by both tools. However, discrepancies between prediction tools were observed for certain variants. For example, Leu193Met was classified as “damaging” by PolyPhen-2(score 0.963) but deemed “tolerated” by SIFT. These inconsistencies likely arise from differences in the computational algorithms and training parameters used by each tool [83]. When conflicting results occur, researchers can consider additional factors such as population-specific allele frequencies and functional assays.

Table 1.

Genetic variants in CYP2R1 gene and their functionality prediction using in silico tools.

Genetic Variant
ID
Location Amino Acid
Substitution
PolyPhen SIFT
1592939 4T>C Trp2Arg Benign 0 Not tolerated 0.07
2179637 14G>C Trp5Ser Benign 0 Not tolerated 0.21
1919558 17G>C Arg6Thr Benign 0 Tolerated 0.36
1399245 22G>A Glu8Lys Benign 0.018 Tolerated 0.36
792888 29G>C Gly10Ala Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0.50
2084757 40C>G Leu14Val Benign 0.295 Tolerated 0.30
1414730 69C>A Phe23Leu Benign 0 Tolerated 0.07
3270606 77G>C Gly26Ala Benign 0 Tolerated 0.29
1059990 107C>T Pro36Leu Damaging 0.945 Not tolerated 1
1939745 112G>A Gly38Ser Benign 0.07 Tolerated 0
2414155 121C>A Pro41Thr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2332099 163C>G Leu55Val Damaging 0.86 Tolerated 0.07
1950230 169G>T Ala57Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0.14
1368104 200G>A Arg67Lys Benign 0 Tolerated 0
2533332 203A>C Lys68Thr Benign 0.042 Tolerated 0
847396 235T>A Leu79Ile Benign 0.036 Not tolerated 1
1345679 253T>C Ser85Pro Benign 0 Tolerated 0
1912325 272G>A Gly91Asp Damaging 0.94 Not tolerated 1
2134 296T>C Leu99Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
960805 310G>A Glu104Lys Damaging 0.984 Not tolerated 1
2068341 325A>G Arg109Gly Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1000400 352A>G Met118Val Benign 0.43 Tolerated 0
957411 421G>A Val141Ile Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0
934633 467C>G Ser156Cys Damaging 0.454 Not tolerated 1
2374820 497A>G Asn166Ser Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
835914 515A>G Tyr172Cys Benign 0.07 Tolerated 0
1304683 551C>T Thr184Met Damaging 0.777 Not tolerated 1
1310664 577C>A Leu193Met Damaging 0.963 Tolerated 0
2060962 577C>G Leu193Val Benign 0.002 Tolerated 0
2172123 582C>G Ile194Met Damaging 0.558 Not tolerated 1
2067369 661G>A Ala221Thr Benign 0.294 Tolerated 0
1918882 744A>C Arg248Ser Benign 0.17 Tolerated 0
1996774 806A>G Lys269Arg Benign 0.034 Tolerated 0
2281495 850A>G Met284Val Benign 0.077 Tolerated 0
418154 851T>C Met284Thr Benign 0.059 Not tolerated 1
218799 852G>A Met284Ile Benign 0.00 Tolerated 0
1435363 859G>A Gly287Ser Benign 0.00 Tolerated 0
2470790 899T>G Leu300Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1356309 913G>A Gly305Ser Benign 0.166 Tolerated 0
936742 950A>G Asn317Ser Damaging 0.864 Tolerated 0
429315 995T>C Ile332Thr Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
1059302 1011G>T Gln337His Benign 0.002 Tolerated 0
1714746 1054T>A Trp352Arg Damaging 0.876 Not tolerated 1
429316 1126C>T Pro376Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2160764 1142A>G His381Arg Damaging 0.725 Tolerated 0
2067311 1147A>G Thr383Ala Damaging 0.909 Tolerated 0
3079576 1148C>T Thr383Ile Damaging 0.998 Tolerated 0
3079577 1151C>G Ser384Cys Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
1008903 1166T>A Val389Glu Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
2288720 1178C>T Ser393Phe Benign 0.11 Tolerated 0
930898 1181T>C Ile394Thr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2260893 1196C>G Thr399Arg Damaging 0.511 Tolerated 0
1302522 1198G>C Val400Leu Damaging 0.662 Tolerated 0
2416170 1205C>T Thr402Ile Benign 0.20 Tolerated 0
2092937 1232A>G Glu411Gly Damaging 0.992 Tolerated 0
2193872 1280A>G Asp427Gly Damaging 0.984 Not tolerated 1
2263146 1291T>C Tyr431His Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
2964676 1298C>G Ala433Gly Benign 0.005 Tolerated 0
2554404 1303A>G Lys435Glu Damaging 0.593 Tolerated 0
3016792 1322T>C Phe441Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1025990 1348G>C Gly450Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2138093 1351G>A Glu451Lys Damaging 0.994 Not tolerated 1
1385510 1363C>T Arg455Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1391635 1364G>A Arg455Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1334316 1394T>G Leu465Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2233339 1397T>C Leu466Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3079578 1424A>G His475Arg Benign 0 Tolerated 0.50
2580540 1427A>T Glu476Val Benign 0 Not tolerated 0.50
2127312 1436C>A Pro479Gln Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
3270607 1478C>G Pro493Arg Damaging 0.986 Tolerated 0

PolyPhen provides a probability score for how damaging a variant is, with higher values indicating more likelihood of pathogenicity, while SIFT predicts whether a substitution is “tolerated” or “not tolerated”, with a focus on protein functionality. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the DNA sequence of the CYP2R1 transcript NM_024514.5.

Table 2.

Genetic variants in CYP27B1 gene and their functionality prediction using in silico tools.

Genetic Variant
ID
Location Amino Acid
Substitution
PolyPhen SIFT
310004 40C>T .Arg14Cys Damaging 0.996 Not tolerated 0.73
934616 41G>A Arg14His Damaging 0.989 Not tolerated 0.73
3079447 49T>A Trp17Arg Benign 0 Tolerated 0.23
1943189 148G>A Ala50Thr Benign 0 Tolerated 0.09
1715471 163A>G Lys55Glu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
1467327 164A>T Lys55Met Damaging 0.996 Not tolerated 0.91
1457495 170G>T Gly57Val Damaging 0.996 Tolerated 0.09
2301172 200A>G Gln67Arg Benign 0.016 Tolerated 0.09
1975900 230T>C Leu77Pro Benign 0.016 Tolerated 0.09
3079444 286G>A Glu96Lys Benign 0.085 Tolerated 0.09
380287 305G>A Gly102Glu Benign 0.014 Tolerated 0.09
2180339 310C>T Arg104Trp Benign 0.004 Tolerated 0.09
1960647 311G>A Arg104Gln Benign 0.175 Tolerated 0.09
1658 320G>A Arg107His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
1923855 328T>C Phe110Leu Benign 0 Tolerated 0.09
1705730 335C>T Pro112Leu Benign 0 Tolerated 0.09
2191011 346C>G His116Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
2092360 350G>A Arg117His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
1950321 358C>T Arg120Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
432037 373G>A Gly125Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
1659 374G>A Gly125Glu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.91
722611 385G>A Ala129Thr Damaging 0.576 Tolerated 0.09
1339453 386C>T Ala129Val Damaging 0.998 Tolerated 0.09
1016722 413G>T Arg138Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1067732 428C>T Pro143Leu Damaging 0.585 Tolerated 0
310002 437T>A Leu146His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2514871 448G>A Ala150Thr Benign 0.295 Tolerated 0
3079445 461A>T Tyr154Phe Benign 0.190 Tolerated 0
3270536 463G>T Ala155Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0
3339156 490G>A Asp164Asn Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1443676 511C>T Arg171Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
310001 541G>T Ala181Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0.27
1345874 547G>C Val183Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1674 566A>G Glu189Gly Benign 0.165 Tolerated 0
3079449 571T>C Tyr191His Benign 0.253 Tolerated 0
2152155 580G>A Gly194Arg Benign 0 Tolerated 0
968805 584T>A Leu195Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1339454 623G>T Gly208Val Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2336628 651C>A Asp217Glu Benign 0 Tolerated 0
2187188 657G>C Glu219Asp Benign 0.176 Tolerated 0
1708812 704C>A Thr235Asn Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2332756 707T>C Met236Thr Benign 0.025 Tolerated 0
2116143 733C>T Leu245Phe Benign 0.01 Tolerated 0
1900220 764G>A Arg255Gln Benign 0 Tolerated 0
2627673 779T>G Met260Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2499531 781T>G Phe261Val Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
310000 788T>G Phe263Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
309999 794A>T Gln265Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2123967 850G>A Glu284Lys Benign 0.01 Tolerated 0.09
2911178 914A>C Gln305Pro Benign 0 Tolerated 0
1929411 939G>C Glu313Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1666 962C>G Thr321Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1660 1004G>C Arg335Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3270537 1009C>T Pro337Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1673 1027C>T Leu343Phe Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2359237 1052T>G Leu351Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3362736 1052T>C Leu351Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2191446 1094C>T Ser365Phe Benign 0 Tolerated 0
2020701 1108C>A Leu370Met Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1339455 1160A>C Asn387Thr Damaging 0.774 Tolerated 0
1672 1165C>G Arg389Gly Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1324206 1165C>T Arg389Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1669 1166G>A .Arg389His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2806255 1192G>A Gly398Ser Benign 0.41 Tolerated 0
1001177 1198T>G Tyr400Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1936106 1217C>T Thr406Met Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1343091 1232G>A Cys411Tyr Damaging 0.965 Not tolerated 1
265095 1286G>C Arg429Pro Damaging 0.976 Tolerated 0
2735903 1294C>T Arg432Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2331380 1318C>T Pro440Ser Benign 0.025 Tolerated 0
3079443 1337T>G Leu446Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2722314 1352G>T Gly451Val Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
802871 1357C>T Arg453Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2103440 1364G>A Cys455Tyr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1007304 1376G>A Arg459His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3251601 1376G>T Arg459Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2808964 1382C>A Ala461Glu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
309996 1385A>T Glu462Val Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
857514 1474C>T Arg492Trp Damaging 0.996 Tolerated 0
2164587 1499G>A Ser500Asn Damaging 0.599 Tolerated 0
309995 1505A>G Asn502Ser Benign 0.238 Tolerated 0
2099009 1517T>G Leu506Trp Damaging 0.923 Tolerated 0.09

PolyPhen provides a probability score for how damaging a variant is, with higher values indicating more likelihood of pathogenicity, while SIFT predicts whether a substitution is “tolerated” or “not tolerated”, with a focus on protein functionality. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the DNA sequence of the CYP27B1 transcript NM_000785.4.

Table 3.

Genetic variants in CYP24A1 gene and their functionality prediction using in silico tools.

Genetic Variant
ID
Location Amino Acid
Substitution
PolyPhen SIFT
694500 3G>T Met1Ile Damaging 0.931 Not tolerated 0.30
1446612 22A>G Ser8Gly Benign 0.104 Tolerated 0.70
3079403 34G>C Ala12Pro Damaging 0.612 Tolerated 0.70
1530538 37G>A Ala13Thr Benign 0.008 Not tolerated 0.30
338839 73C>G Pro25Ala Benign 0.049 Not tolerated 0.30
3270510 78A>C Arg26Ser Benign 0.024 Not tolerated 0.30
338838 101C>T Thr34Met Damaging 0.661 Tolerated 0.70
2154023 116G>T Arg39Leu Benign 0.208 Not tolerated 0.30
3079401 116G>A Arg39Gln Benign 0.226 Tolerated 0.70
2311515 134C>A Pro45Gln Benign 0.078 Not tolerated 0.30
1021961 175C>T Pro59Ser Damaging 0.98 Not tolerated 0.70
338836 217A>T Ile73Phe Damaging 0.967 Tolerated 0.1
1921257 250G>A Asp84Asn Benign 0.002 Tolerated 0.1
338833 295A>G Met99Val Damaging 0.998 Tolerated 0
897021 296T>C Met99Thr Damaging 0.996 Tolerated 0
2124827 304G>C Gly102Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2652423 305G>C Gly102Ala Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1384043 313G>C Glu105Gln Benign 0.428 Tolerated 0
1974478 320T>C Val107Ala Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2398535 323A>G His108Arg Damaging 0.997 Tolerated 0
1988031 324C>A His108Gln Damaging 0.991 Tolerated 0
2490932 337T>G Cys113Gly Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0
1044874 343C>A Leu115Met Damaging 0.988 Tolerated 0
2367135 356A>G Tyr119Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
338832 359G>T Arg120Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3019023 359G>A Arg120His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2101959 366G>T Glu122Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2477504 368G>A Ser123Asn Benign 0.339 Tolerated 0
897020 376C>T Pro126Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2866341 382C>T Arg128Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
728557 385C>A Leu129Met Damaging 0.999 Tolerated 0
897019 397C>G Pro133Ala Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1067888 400T>G Trp134Gly Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1036471 425A>G Lys142Arg Benign 0.039 Tolerated 0
2729394 437G>A Gly146Glu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
631878 443T>C Leu148Pro Damaging 0.998 Not tolerated 1
1489324 457G>A Glu153Lys Benign 0 Tolerated 0
1038891 467A>C Gln156Pro Damaging 0.96 Tolerated 0
285894 469C>T Arg157Trp Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
1373583 469C>G Arg157Gly Damaging 0.997 Not tolerated 1
634948 470G>A Arg157Gln Damaging 0.929 Tolerated 0
895613 473T>C Val158Ala Benign 0.199 Not tolerated 1
942179 475C>T Arg159Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
29676 476G>A Arg159Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
935088 505C>A Pro169Thr Damaging 0.565 Not tolerated 1
1443102 533A>G Lys178Arg Benign 0.008 Tolerated 0
3079404 571G>T Asp191Tyr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2185427 576G>C Glu192Asp Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
338830 577C>A Leu193Ile Benign 0.036 Tolerated 0
2495690 581G>A Cys194Tyr Damaging 0.956 Tolerated 0
1358313 598G>A Val200Ile Benign 0 Tolerated 0
338829 604G>C Asp202His Damaging 0.981 Not tolerated 1
1079881 616G>A Glu206Lys Damaging 0.999 Tolerated 0
2652422 625A>G Lys209Glu Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1948727 639A>C Glu213Asp Damaging 0.997 Not tolerated 1
2067418 652G>T Val218Leu Benign 0.131 Tolerated 0
2683548 652G>A Val218Met Damaging 0.993 Not tolerated 1
1948222 683A>G Gln228Arg Benign 0.002 Not tolerated 1
2411429 688A>C Asn230His Damaging 0.858 Tolerated 0
2544280 688A>T Asn230Tyr Damaging 0.948 Not tolerated 1
338827 695G>A Gly232Glu Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
898600 735G>A Met245Ile Damaging 0.785 Tolerated 0
1979274 743C>T Thr248Met Damaging 0.731 Not tolerated 1
338824 776T>C Leu259Pro Damaging 1 Tolerated 0.10
1913130 788T>C Leu263Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.90
1464834 815C>G Thr272Ser Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1028372 833T>C Ile278Thr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2549031 856A>G Ile286Val Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0
1406180 859G>A Asp287Asn Benign 0.013 Tolerated 0
338823 861C>A Asp287Glu Benign 0.085 Tolerated 0
1015029 904C>T Leu302Phe Damaging 0.996 Tolerated 0
697520 908G>C Cys303Ser Damaging 0.614 Tolerated 0
1945084 928C>T Arg310Trp Damaging 0.989 Tolerated 0
2664932 948G>T Leu316Phe Damaging 0.998 Tolerated 0
29681 964G>A Glu322Lys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1018075 989C>T Thr330Met Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1647156 1031G>A Arg344His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1959393 1058T>C Leu353Pro Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
2081156 1100G>A Arg367Gln Benign 0.184 Tolerated 0
1464180 1103C>A Ala368Glu Damaging 0.997 Tolerated 0
338817 1121T>C Met374Thr Damaging 0.874 Not tolerated 1
338816 1124C>T Pro375Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2040775 1139G>A Cys380Tyr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1455164 1147G>C Glu383Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
29679 1186C>T Arg396Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
953906 1187G>A Arg396Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
338814 1207G>A Val403Ile Damaging 0.618 Tolerated 0
896943 1219T>A Tyr407Asn Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
29680 1226T>C Leu409Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2077753 1235G>A Gly412Glu Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
3362760 1238C>A Thr413Lys Damaging 0.612 Not tolerated 1
2005956 1259A>C Gln420Pro Damaging 0.996 Tolerated 0
1333737 1268G>T Gly423Val Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1904576 1282A>G Asn428Asp Damaging 0.812 Tolerated 0
2558744 1288G>A Glu430Lys Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
2535527 1298G>T Ser433Ile Damaging 0.601 Not tolerated 1
1333645 1310C>A Pro437His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
931571 1315C>T Arg439Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
338813 1361C>T Pro454Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1354397 1366G>C Gly456Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
896940 1369G>A Val457Ile Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0
1984362 1387A>G Ile463Val Benign 0.023 Tolerated 0
2716855 1390G>C Gly464Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1063076 1394G>A Arg465His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2454835 1450G>A Asp484Asn Benign 0.002 Tolerated 0
1622534 1460C>T Ala487Val Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
2482164 1467C>G Asp489Glu Damaging 0.999 Tolerated 0
1919479 1490A>C His497Pro Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
3079402 1502T>A Leu501Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3066341 1507C>G Pro503Ala Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2138356 1508C>T Pro503Leu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
895540 1513C>G Arg505Gly Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3016767 1513C>T Arg505Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
895539 1518A>T Glu506Asp Damaging 0.944 Tolerated 0
1446233 1518A>C Glu506Asp Damaging 0.944 Tolerated 0
1903225 1519C>A Leu507Ile Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1803423 1525A>G Ile509Val Benign 0.002 Tolerated 0
895538 1528G>A Ala510Thr Damaging 0.921 Tolerated 0
697436 1529C>T Ala510Val Benign 0.265 Tolerated 0
2327122 1535G>A Cys512Tyr Benign 0.015 Tolerated 0.1

PolyPhen provides a probability score for how damaging a variant is, with higher values indicating more likelihood of pathogenicity, while SIFT predicts whether a substitution is “tolerated” or “not tolerated”, with a focus on protein functionality. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the DNA sequence of the CYP24A1 transcript NM_000782.5.

Table 4.

Genetic variants in VDR gene and their functionality prediction using in silico tools.

Genetic Variant
ID
Location Amino Acid
Substitution
Polyphen SIFT
308887 2T>C Met1Thr Benign 0.29 Not tolerated 0.68
3235711 2T>G Met1Arg Damaging 0.97 Not tolerated 0.68
2174849 10A>G Met4Val Benign 0 Tolerated 0.42
882357 14C>T Ala5Val Benign 0 Tolerated 0.47
2261491 17C>T Ala6Val Benign 0 Tolerated 0.47
882356 52C>T Arg18Trp Damaging 0.99 Not tolerated 0.53
3032901 53G>A Arg18Gln Benign 0.01 Tolerated 0.47
2410921 58G>A Val20Met Benign 0.07 Tolerated 0.47
959736 61C>T Pro21Ser Damaging 0.96 Not tolerated 0.74
882354 64C>T Arg22Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
880999 65G>A Arg22Gln Damaging 0.91 Not tolerated 1
2072618 65G>C Arg22Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2137321 76G>A Val26Met Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2759116 79T>C Cys27Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
950224 86A>G Asp29Gly Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
848467 89G>A Arg30Gln Damaging 0.61 Tolerated 0
7745 98G>A Gly33Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3339539 98G>C Gly33Ala Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1407165 110A>G Asn37Ser Damaging 0.99 Not tolerated 1
7753 137G>A Gly46Asp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1954983 137G>C Gly46Ala Damaging 0.99 Not tolerated 1
7750 149G>A Arg50Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1193364 156G>T Met52Ile Benign 0.11 Tolerated 0
3004611 160C>T Arg54Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1370955 161G>A Arg54Gln Damaging 0.99 Not tolerated 1
717364 176C>T Thr59Ile Benign 0.22 Tolerated 0
961739 182C>T Pro61Leu Damaging 0.94 Not tolerated 1
1957857 191G>A Gly64Glu Damaging 0.54 Not tolerated 1
1425408 199C>T Arg67Cys Damaging 0.81 Not tolerated 1
1009301 200G>A Arg67His Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
1059781 212A>G Asp71Gly Damaging 0.58 Tolerated 0
7746 218G>A Arg73Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3148965 220C>A Arg74Ser Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
880998 221G>A Arg74His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
635013 227G>T Cys76Phe Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
3188427 236G>A Cys79Tyr Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
7749 239G>A Arg80Gln Damaging 0.996 Not tolerated 1
953840 257A>G Asp86Gly Benign 0.197 Not tolerated 1
64425 259A>G Ile87Val Damaging 0.72 Tolerated 0
880997 274G>A Glu92Lys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2154778 310C>T Arg104Trp Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
880996 311G>A Arg104Gln Damaging 0.998 Not tolerated 1
962188 361C>T Arg121Trp Damaging 0.986 Not tolerated 0.79
880995 362G>A Arg121Gln Damaging 0.858 Tolerated 0.21
2175400 388C>T Arg130Cys Damaging 0.996 Not tolerated 1
2007326 389G>C Arg130Pro Damaging 0.921 Tolerated 0
2136689 389G>A Arg130His Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
957488 395T>G Ile132Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1517667 411C>A Asp137Glu Benign 0 Tolerated 0
2115626 419A>C His140Pro Damaging 0.941 Tolerated 0
2438523 446A>G Asp149Gly Benign 0.109 Tolerated 0
944289 460C>T Arg154Trp Damaging 0.997 Not tolerated 1
1006650 463C>A Pro155Thr Damaging 0.966 Tolerated 0
1991958 473G>A Arg158His Benign 0.388 Tolerated 0.11
1432897 519A>T Arg173Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0.11
1971286 527C>T Pro176Leu Benign 0 Tolerated 0.84
1979236 541G>A Asp181Asn Benign 0 Tolerated 0.68
1036372 542A>G Asp181Gly Benign 0.087 Tolerated 0.68
1056222 565C>A His189Asn Benign 0 Tolerated 0.74
2521491 575C>G Thr192Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0.63
1387284 610A>C Asn204His Damaging 0.703 Tolerated 0.21
2267460 613C>G Leu205Val Benign 0.263 Tolerated 0.21
1508246 634T>A Ser212Thr Benign 0.263 Tolerated 0.21
3064877 670C>T Leu224Phe Benign 0.011 Tolerated 0.21
2093377 683C>T Pro228Leu Damaging 0.976 Not tolerated 0.79
2119717 696C>G Asp232Glu Benign 0.059 Tolerated 0.11
2162565 720G>T Lys240Asn Damaging 0.81 Not tolerated 0.84
2179980 725T>C Ile242Thr Damaging 0.989 Not tolerated 0.84
1958573 759C>G Asp253Glu Benign 0 Tolerated 0.11
2074580 771G>C Glu257Asp Benign 0.008 Tolerated 0.11
1407164 775C>G Gln259Glu Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.89
1516080 781G>A Val261Ile Benign 0.230 Tolerated 0.11
1162259 803T>C Ile268Thr Damaging 0.984 Not tolerated 0.89
3064965 820C>T Arg274Cys Damaging 1 Tolerated 0.05
7752 821G>T Arg274Leu Damaging 1 Tolerated 0.05
915348 821G>A Arg274His Damaging 0.998 Not tolerated 0.95
1504399 821G>C Arg274Pro Damaging 1 Tolerated 0.05
2067557 824C>T Ser275Phe Benign 0.271 Tolerated 0.05
2097936 845A>G Asp282Gly Benign 0.02 Tolerated 0
2506489 856T>C Trp286Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1949259 869A>G Asn290Ser Benign 0 Tolerated 0.21
3339933 874G>C Asp292His Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0.05
1449972 886C>T Arg296Cys Benign 0.045 Tolerated 0.32
308882 889G>A Val297Ile Benign 0 Tolerated 0.11
2129305 901A>G Thr301Ala Benign 0 Tolerated 0
1338550 910G>A Gly304Arg Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
7754 915C>G His305Gln Damaging 0.977 Not tolerated 1
7755 941T>G Ile314Ser Damaging 0.739 Not tolerated 1
308879 945G>T Lys315Asn Damaging 0.992 Not tolerated 1
2438524 967C>G Leu323Val Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
7748 985G>A Glu329Lys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2585094 985G>C Glu329Gln Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1118099 1015G>A Val339Ile Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
860001 1016T>C Val339Ala Benign 0.345 Not tolerated 1
381603 1027C>T Arg343Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2135373 1030C>T Pro344Ser Damaging 0.998 Not tolerated 1
7759 1036G>A Val346Met Damaging 0.998 Not tolerated 1
3188425 1040A>G Gln347Arg Benign 0.003 Tolerated 0
1037220 1045G>A Ala349Thr Benign 0 Tolerated 0
308878 1048G>A Ala350Thr Benign 0.001 Tolerated 0
727362 1073G>A Arg358His Benign 0.045 Not tolerated 1
754732 1085C>T Thr362Ile Benign 0.009 Tolerated 0
2429695 1088T>C Leu363Pro Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1038635 1102C>T Arg368Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
1342526 1103G>T Arg368Leu Benign 0.045 Tolerated 0
2519398 1108C>G Arg370Gly Damaging 0.957 Tolerated 0
840199 1109G>A Arg370His Benign 0,028 Tolerated 0
1040776 1115C>T Pro372Leu Benign 0.226 Not tolerated 0.89
882575 1121C>G Pro374Arg Damaging 1 Tolerated 0
1038600 1163C>A Ala388Asp Damaging 0.792 Not tolerated 1
7756 1171C>T Arg391Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
264696 1171C>A Arg391Ser Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
2137319 1172G>A Arg391His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 1
882309 1183G>C Glu395Gln Benign 0.129 Tolerated 0
2747488 1186G>A Glu396Lys Damaging 0.995 Not tolerated 1
264697 1190A>C His397Pro Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 1
2444136 1204C>T Arg402Cys Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.63
2683191 1205G>A Arg402His Damaging 1 Not tolerated 0.63
2792281 1214C>T Ser405Phe Damaging 0.999 Not tolerated 0.63
1917095 1216T>A Phe406Ile Benign 0.026 Tolerated 0.37
992465 1229G>T Cys410Phe Benign 0.041 Tolerated 0.37
2099534 1273G>A Glu425Lys Damaging 0.981 Not tolerated 0.42

PolyPhen provides a probability score for how damaging a variant is, with higher values indicating more likelihood of pathogenicity, while SIFT predicts whether a substitution is “tolerated” or “not tolerated”, with a focus on protein functionality. The numbering of nucleotides is based on the DNA sequence of the VDR transcript NM_000376.3.

Although in silico tools offer useful predictions about the possible effects of genetic variants, care should be taken when interpreting their findings. Discrepancies between these tools indicate the need for experimental validation to confirm functional effects.

Similarly, the analysis of CYP27B1 variants (Table 2) showed that among the 100 examined variants, Arg14Cys (40C>T), Arg389Cys (1165C>T), Arg459Leu (1376G>T), and Arg335Pro (1004G>C) were consistently classified as deleterious by both PolyPhen-2 (high pathogenicity scores) and SIFT (“not tolerated”). These variants are predominantly located at conserved residues, frequently involving polar or charged amino acids essential for CYP27B1 stability and enzymatic function. In contrast, substitutions such as Pro112Leu (335C>T), Ala129Thr (385G>A), and Gly208Val (623G>T) were predicted to be benign, suggesting negligible effects on protein function.

The evaluation of CYP24A1 variants (Table 3) indicated diverse functional consequences. For example, Met1Ile (3G>T) was predicted to be damaging by PolyPhen-2 (score 0.931) and “not tolerated” by SIFT (score 0.30), indicating a likely deleterious effect. Similarly, Gly102Arg (304G>C) was classified as highly damaging by both tools, with a PolyPhen-2score of 1.0 and a SIFT score of 1, suggesting a severe impact on protein function. Conversely, Ser8Gly (22A>G) was predicted to be benign, with a PolyPhen-2 score of 0.104 and a SIFT score of 0.70, implying minimal disruption. Variants such as Asp84Asn (250G>A) and Val218Leu (652G>T) were similarly classified as benign. However, conflicting predictions were observed for Ala12Pro (34G>C), which was considered “damaging” by PolyPhen-2 (score 0.612) but “tolerated” by SIFT (score 0.70).

Finally, the analysis of VDR variants (Table 4) identified several substitutions classified as deleterious, with PolyPhen-2 scores nearing 1.0 and “not tolerated” designations by SIFT, indicating a high probability of functional impairment. Notable examples include Arg22Trp (64C>T), Arg54Trp (160C>T), and Val346Met (1036G>A). In contrast, Met4Val (10A>G) and Ala6Val (17C>T) were consistently classified as benign, with low PolyPhen-2 scores and “tolerated” designations in SIFT, suggesting minimal functional consequences.

9. Genetic Variants Identified in Human Clinical Studies

Table 5 summarizes genetic variants in Vit.D-metabolizing genes that have been associated with various diseases in human studies. Notably, the majority of disease-associated mutations in Vit.D -related genes are nonsense SNPs, which introduce premature stop codons, leading to truncated, non-functional proteins that impair Vit.D metabolism and function. Among these variants, the CYP2R1 promoter variant rs10741657 has been linked to reduced circulating 25-hydroxyVit.D levels, increasing susceptibility to Vit.D deficiency, particularly in White European populations. In the CYP27B1 gene, missense variants have been implicated in various forms of VDDR. The rs118204009 variant, which results in an arginine-to-histidine (Arg389His) substitution, has been clinically associated with VDDR1A, causing impaired calcium homeostasis and bone mineralization, as supported by both functional studies and in silico predictions (Table 2). Similarly, the rs118204011 variant, causing a leucine-to-phenylalanine (Leu343Phe) substitution, is linked to VDDR1 and altered enzymatic function. Meanwhile, the rs118204012 variant, which replaces glutamic acid with glycine (Glu189Gly), has been associated with VDDR1A, although in silico analysis suggests it may have a benign impact on protein function (Table 2).

Table 5.

Genetic variants found to be associated with vitamin D-related diseases in human studies.

Gene Reference
SNP Number
Molecular
Consequences
Clinical Consequences
CYP27B1 rs778438734 Nonsense(Tyr7X) Associated with an increased risk of vitamin D-dependent rickets type I (VDDR-I) due to the inhibition of active vitamin D synthesis [83].
CYP27B1 rs2140398340 Nonsense(Trp17X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-I due to the inhibition of active vitamin D synthesis [84].
CYP27B1 rs760233049 Nonsense(Gln121X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-I due to the inhibition of active vitamin D synthesis [85].
CYP27B1 rs2140397262 Nonsense(Gln135X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-I due to the inhibition of active vitamin D synthesis [86].
CYP27B1 rs118204009 Missense(Arg389His) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-I due to the impaired 1-α-hydroxylase activity and reduced conversion of25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to its active form [87].
CYP27B1 rs118204011 Missense(Leu343Phe) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-I due to reduced 1-alpha-hydroxylase activity, leading to vitamin D deficiency [72].
CYP27B1 rs118204012 Missense(Glu189Gly) A variant of uncertain significance reported to be associated with vitamin D insufficiency [73,88].
CYP2R1 rs1306247629 Nonsense(Tyr73X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to disrupted CYP2R1 protein, resulting in impaired vitamin D activation [89].
CYP2R1 rs1555014321 Nonsense(Glu42X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to truncated CYP2R1 protein, resulting in impaired vitamin D 25-hydroxylase activity [90].
CYP2R1 rs1848596931 Nonsense(Cys98X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to truncated CYP2R1 protein, resulting in impaired vitamin D 25-hydroxylase activity [91].
CYP2R1 rs781823033 Nonsense(Arg131X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to truncated CYP2R1 protein, leading to impaired vitamin D 25-hydroxylase activity and defective vitamin D metabolism [92].
CYP2R1 rs782006425 Nonsense(Trp234X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to truncated CYP2R1 protein, resulting in impaired vitamin D 25-hydroxylase activity [92].
CYP2R1 rs199883994 Nonsense(Arg424X) Associated with an increased risk of VDDR-1B due to truncated CYP2R1 protein, resulting in impaired vitamin D 25-hydroxylase activity [92].
CYP2R1 rs10741657 Promoter variant (Altered transcription) Associated with decreased 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, particularly in homozygous individuals [60].
VDR rs121909792 Nonsense(Tyr295X) Associated with hereditary vitamin D-resistant rickets (HVDRR), presenting with rickets, growth retardation, skeletal deformities, and alopecia [93].
VDR rs1185429975 Nonsense(Ser187X) Associated with HVDRR, presenting with rickets, hypocalcemia, and alopecia [59].
VDR rs121909795 Nonsense(Gln152X) Associated with HVDRR due to impaired binding of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [94].
VDR rs980041568 Nonsense(Arg73X) Classified as pathogenic and observed in individuals with vitamin D-dependent rickets [95].
VDR rs201106427 Nonsense(Arg50X) Classified as pathogenic and observed in individuals with vitamin D-dependent rickets, presenting with alopecia and hypocalcemia [96].
CYP24A1 rs6068816 Silent (Arg159Arg) Associated with an increased risk of hyperuricemia, particularly in overweight individuals [97].
CYP24A1 rs6022999 Intron variant Associated with an increased risk of chronic hepatitis C virus infection due to disruptions in vitamin D metabolism [98].
CYP24A1 rs2762943 Promoter variant (Altered transcription) Associated with low serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in multiple sclerosis patients [99].
CYP24A1 rs4809959 Intron variant Increased risk of chronic systemic lupus erythematosus due to disruptions in vitamin D metabolism [100].
CYP24A1 rs17216707 Promoter variant (Altered transcription) Associated with impaired vitamin D metabolism in kidney stone disease [101].
CYP24A1 rs6013905 Intron variant Associated with impaired vitamin D metabolism in colorectal cancer patients [102].
CYP24A1 rs4809957 Intron variant Associated with vitamin D deficiency in type II diabetes [103].
CYP24A1 rs17219315 Intron variant Associated with altered vitamin D metabolism and autism in children [104].
CYP24A1 rs2296241 Silent (Pro289Pro) Associated with an increased risk of hormone-related cancers [104].

All of the variants were selected from the literature and checked with the NCBI-supported public website PheGenI (The Phenotype–Genotype Integrator, ncbi.nlm.nih/gab/phegeni).

10. Conclusions

Vit.D deficiency and its associated disorders are widespread, affecting populations across various regions globally. Both genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to individual variability in Vit.D metabolism, signaling, and response. Our in silico analysis of genetic variants in Vit.D-related genes with unknown functionality demonstrates that numerous variants significantly impact the key proteins involved in Vit.D activation, inactivation, and signaling mechanisms. These findings may indicate the polygenic nature of Vit.D response, suggesting that analyzing a single genetic variant may not fully explain the phenotypic variability observed in Vit.D deficiency. In this review, we have systematically compiled and examined genetic variants associated with Vit.D synthesis, metabolism, and signaling, integrating in silico functional predictions with clinically studied human variants. This comprehensive approach provides a more detailed understanding of the molecular basis of Vit.D function. A comprehensive analysis of all Vit.D-related genes is essential for advancing personalized medicine in the context of Vit.D deficiency. The development of a specialized diagnostic panel incorporating key genetic variants with significant functional impact on Vit.D metabolism and activity would be invaluable for precise risk assessment and the implementation of personalized treatment strategies. Such advancements could pave the way for targeted interventions to mitigate the adverse health effects associated with Vit.D deficiency.

11. Strengths and Limitations

This review highlights its strong points. It offers a thorough review of the literature on genetic polymorphisms linked to Vit.D and their possible effects on biochemical and metabolic parameters. Finding these genetic variations can aid in the development of individualized treatment plans for patients with Vit.D deficiency, making the review clinically relevant.

It is important to recognize the limitations of this review. Because studies that report significant associations are more likely to be published, potential publication bias may be an issue. Furthermore, there is a lack of thorough information on some ethnic groups, such as Middle Eastern populations. Lastly, a lot of research does not completely take into consideration confounding variables like diet, exercise, and sun exposure, all of which can influence Vit.D levels.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Al-Balqa Applied (Jordan) and Inje University (South Korea) for supporting this research.

Abbreviations

25-OH Vit.D 25-Hydroxyvitamin D
7-DHC 7-Dehydrocholesterol
CYP Cytochrome P450 Enzyme
GH Growth Hormone
MS Multiple Sclerosis
PTH Parathyroid Hormone
RA Rheumatoid Arthritis
RXR Retinoid X Receptor
SNP Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism
VDDR1 Vitamin D-Dependent Rickets Type 1
VDR Vitamin D Receptor
VDRE Vitamin D Response Element
Vit.D Vitamin D

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-J.L. and Y.J.; methodology, S.-J.L. and Y.J.; software, Y.J. and G.A.; data curation, Y.J. and G.A.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J. and G.A.; writing—review and editing, S.-J.L.; supervision, S.-J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available with the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

The article was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Korean government (NRF-2020R1I1A3073778), and the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by Korea (MIST) (2018R1A5A2021242).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Wang H., Chen W., Li D., Yin X., Zhang X., Olsen N., Zheng S.G. Vitamin D and Chronic Diseases. Aging Dis. 2017;8:346–353. doi: 10.14336/AD.2016.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ammar M., Heni S., Tira M.S., Khalij Y., Hamdouni H., Amor D., Ksibi S., Omezzine A., Bouslama A. Variability in response to vitamin D supplementation according to vitamin D metabolism-related gene polymorphisms in healthy adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2023;77:189–194. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01218-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramos-Lopez E., Bruck P., Jansen T., Herwig J., Badenhoop K. CYP2R1 (vitamin D 25-hydroxylase) gene is associated with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes and vitamin D levels in Germans. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2007;23:631–636. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wjst M., Altmuller J., Braig C., Bahnweg M., Andre E. A genome-wide linkage scan for 25-OH-D(3) and 1,25-(OH)2-D3 serum levels in asthma families. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;103:799–802. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.David A.J., Robert T.W., Christopher J.G., Adrian R.M. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the vitamin D pathway associating with circulating concentrations of vitamin D metabolites and non-skeletal health outcomes: Review of genetic association studies. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016;164:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang T.J., Zhang F., Richards J.B., Kestenbaum J.B., van Meurs J.B., Berry D., Kiel D.P., Streeten E.A., Ohlsson C., Koller D.L., et al. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: A genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376:180–188. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60588-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang X., Zhang M.Y., Miller W.L., Portale A.A. Novel gene mutations in patients with 1alpha-hydroxylase deficiency that confer partial enzyme activity in vitro. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;87:2424–2430. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.6.8534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang Y., Yang S., Liu Y., Ren L. Relationship between polymorphisms in vitamin D metabolism-related genes and the risk of rickets in Han Chinese children. BMC Med. Genet. 2013;14:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-14-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barry E.L., Rees J.R., Peacock J.L., Mott L.A., Amos C.I., Bostick R.M., Figueiredo J.C., Ahnen D.J., Bresalier R.S., Burke C.A., et al. Genetic variants in CYP2R1, CYP24A1, and VDR modify the efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation for increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:E2133–E2137. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pilz S., Theiler-Schwetz V., Pludowski P., Zelzer S., Meinitzer A., Karras S.N., Misiorowski W., Zittermann A., März W., Trummer C. Hypercalcemia in pregnancy due to CYP24A1 mutations: Case report and review of the literature. Nutrients. 2022;14:2518. doi: 10.3390/nu14122518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schlingmann K.P., Kaufmann M., Weber S., Irwin A., Goos C., John U., Misselwitz J., Klaus G., Kuwertz-Bröking E., Fehrenbach H., et al. Mutations in CYP24A1 and idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:410–421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lutz S., Brion C., Kliebhan M., Albert F.W. DNA variants affecting the expression of numerous genes in trans have diverse mechanisms of action and evolutionary histories. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hsiao Y.H., Bahn J.H., Lin X., Chan T.M., Wang R., Xiao X. Alternative splicing modulated by genetic variants demonstrates accelerated evolution regulated by highly conserved proteins. Genome Res. 2016;26:440–450. doi: 10.1101/gr.193359.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Begin A.S., Hidrue M., Lehrhoff S., Del Carmen M.G., Armstrong K., Wasfy J.H. Factors associated with physician tolerance of uncertainty: An observational study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2022;37:1415–1421. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06776-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCollum E.V., Simmonds N., Becker J.E., Shipley P.G. An experimental demonstration of the existence of a vitamin which promotes calcium deposition. J. Biol. Chem. 1922;53:293–298. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)85783-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wintermeyer E., Ihle C., Ehnert S., Stöckle U., Ochs G., Zwart P., De Flesch I., Bahrs C., Nüssler A.K. Crucial role of vitamin D in the musculoskeletal system. Nutrients. 2016;25:319. doi: 10.3390/nu8060319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Acar S., Demir K., Shi Y. Genetic causes of rickets. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;9:88–105. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.2017.S008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones G. The discovery and synthesis of the nutritional factor vitamin D. Int. J. Paleopathol. 2018;23:96–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khazai N., Judd S.E., Tangpricha V. Calcium and vitamin D: Skeletal and extraskeletal health. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2008;10:110–117. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0020-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Antonucci R., Locci C., Clemente M.G., Chicconi E. Vitamin D deficiency in childhood: Old lessons and current challenges. J. Pediatr. Biochem. 2018;31:247–250. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2017-0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang S., Lee H. Vitamin D and health—The missing vitamin in humans. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2019;60:237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jacquillet G., Unwin R.J. Physiological regulation of phosphate by vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and phosphate (Pi) Springer. 2019;83:83–98. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2231-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bikle D., Christakos S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action—Addressing the skin as source and target. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:234–252. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0312-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Z., Schuetz E.G., Xu Y., Thummel K.E. Interplay between vitamin D and the drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013;136:54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gupta R.P., Patrick K., Bell N.H. Mutational analysis of CYP27A1: Assessment of 27-hydroxylation of cholesterol and 25-hydroxylation of vitamin D. Metabolism. 2007;56:1248–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marcadier J.L. HHS Public Access. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;380:1150–1157. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Warwick T., Schulz M.H., Gilsbach R., Brandes R.P., Seuter S. Nuclear receptor activation shapes spatial genome organization essential for gene expression control: Lessons learned from the vitamin D receptor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:3745–3763. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rochel N., Molnár F. Structural aspects of vitamin D endocrinology. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017;453:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alathari B.E., Sabta A.A., Kalpana C.A., Vimaleswaran K.S. Vitamin D pathway-related gene polymorphisms and their association with metabolic diseases: A literature review. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2020;1701:1729. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00561-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alhawari H., Jarrar Y., Abulebdah D., Abaalkhail S.J., Alkhalili M., Alkhalili S., Alhawari H., Momani M., Obeidat M.N., Fram R.K., et al. Effects of vitamin D receptor genotype on lipid profiles and retinopathy risk in type 2 diabetes patients: A pilot study. J. Pers. Med. 2022;12:1488. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Driel M., Van Leeuwen J.P.T.M. Vitamin D endocrinology of bone mineralization. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017;453:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jensen S.S., Madsen M.W., Lukas J., Binderup L., Bartek J. Inhibitory effects of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the G1–S phase-controlling machinery. Cancer Biol. 2001;15:1370–1380. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.8.0673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Umar M., Sastry K.S., Chouchane A.I. Role of vitamin D beyond the skeletal function: A review of molecular and clinical studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1618. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lim K., Thadhani R. Vitamin D toxicity. Braz. J. Nephrol. 2019;39:60. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhai N., Bidares R., Makoui M.H., Aslani S., Mohammadi P., Razi B., Imani D., Yazdchi M., Mikaeili H. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of type 1 diabetes: A meta-regression and updated meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020;20:121. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00575-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wei R., Christakos S. Mechanisms underlying the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015;7:8251–8260. doi: 10.3390/nu7105392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Barragan M., Good M., Kolls J.K. Regulation of dendritic cell function by vitamin D. Nutrients. 2015;7:8127–8151. doi: 10.3390/nu7095383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Charoenngam N., Holick M.F. Immunologic effects of vitamin D on human health and disease. Nutrients. 2020;12:2097. doi: 10.3390/nu12072097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Castano L., Madariaga L., Grau G., García-Castaño A. 25(OH)Vitamin D deficiency and calcifediol treatment in pediatrics. Nutrients. 2022;14:1854. doi: 10.3390/nu14091854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Roth D.E., Abrams S.A., Aloia J., Bergeron G., Bourassa M.W., Brown K.H., Calvo M.S., Cashman K.D., Combs G., Mar L., et al. Global Prevalence and Disease Burden of Vitamin D Deficiency: A Roadmap for Action in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Wiley. 2018;1430:44–79. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Green R.J., Samy G., Miqdady M.S., Akinyinka O.O., Bs M.B., Saleh G. Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency in Africa and the Middle East, Despite Year-Round Sunny Days. S. Afr. Med. J. 2015;105:603–605. doi: 10.7196/samjnew.7785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Khasawneh R., Hiari M., Khalaileh M. Frequency of Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency in a Jordanian Cohort: A Hospital-Based Study. J. Royal Med. Serv. 2018;25:23–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gaksch M., Jorde R., Grimnes G., Joakimsen R., Schirmer H., Wilsgaard T., Mathiesen E.B., Nj I., Maja-lisa L., Kleber M.E., et al. Vitamin D and Mortality: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Standardized 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in 26,916 Individuals from a European Consortium. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Quraishi S.A., De G., Needleman J.S., Nakazawa H., Kaneki M., Bajwa E.K., Bhan I. Effect of Cholecalciferol Supplementation on Vitamin D Status and Cathelicidin Levels in Sepsis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Crit. Care Med. 2015;43:1928–1937. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rostami M., Tehrani F.R., Simbar M., Yarandi R.B., Minooee S., Hollis B.W. Effectiveness of Prenatal Vitamin D Deficiency Screening and Treatment Program: A Stratified Randomized Field Trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:2936–2948. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hlaimg S.M., Garcia L.A., Contreras J.R. 1,25-Vitamin-D3 Promotes Cardiac Differentiation through Modulation of the Wnt Signaling Pathway. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015;53:303–317. doi: 10.1530/JME-14-0168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gruber-Bzura B.M. Vitamin D and Influenza—Prevention or Therapy? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2419. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Klingberg E., Oleröd G., Konar J., Petzold M., Hammarsten O. Seasonal Variations in Serum 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Levels in a Swedish Cohort. Endocrine. 2015;49:800–808. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0548-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Newton A.H., Cardani A., Braciale T.J. The Host Immune Response in Respiratory Virus Infection: Balancing Virus Clearance and Immunopathology. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016;38:471–482. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0558-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Martineau A.R., Jolliffe D.A., Hooper R.L., Greenberg L., Aloia J.F., Bergman P., Dubnov-Raz G., Esposito S., Ganmaa D., Ginde A.A., et al. Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent Acute Respiratory Tract Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data. BMJ. 2017;356:i6583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lv Y., Yao Q., Ma W., Liu H., Ji J., Li X. Associations of Vitamin D Deficiency and Vitamin D Receptor (Cdx-2, Fok I, Bsm I, and Taq I) Polymorphisms with the Risk of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:116. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0289-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang L., Zhang S., He C., Wang X. VDR Gene Polymorphisms and Allergic Diseases: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Immunol. Investig. 2019;49:166–177. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2019.1674325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bagheri-Hosseinabadi Z., Imani D., Yousefi H., Abbasifard M. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism and risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020;39:3555–3569. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05143-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Makoui M.H., Imani D., Motallebnezhad M., Azimi M., Razi B. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Asthma: Meta-Analysis Based on 17 Case-Control Studies. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;124:57–69. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mohammadi A., Khanbabaei H., Nasiri-Kalmarzi R., Khademi F., Jafari M., Tajik N. Vitamin D Receptor ApaI (rs7975232), BsmI (rs1544410), FokI (rs2228570), and TaqI (rs731236) Gene Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Pulmonary Tuberculosis in an Iranian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019;53:827–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2019.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abdollahzadeh R., Shushizadeh M.H., Barazandehrokh M., Choopani S., Azarnezhad A., Paknahad S., Pirhoushiaran M., Makani S.Z., Yeganeh R.Z., Al-Kateb A., et al. Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical/Severe Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021;96:105098. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Apaydin T., Polat H., Dincer Yazan C. Effects of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms on the Prognosis of COVID-19. Clin. Endocrinol. 2021;77:1–10. doi: 10.1111/cen.14664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Alhammadin G., Jarrar Y., Madani A., Lee S.J. Exploring the Influence of VDR Genetic Variants TaqI, ApaI, and FokI on COVID-19 Severity and Long-COVID-19 Symptoms. J. Pers. Med. 2023;13:1663. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dong A.N., Tan B.H., Pan Y., Ong C.E. The CYP2R1 enzyme: Structure, function, enzymatic properties, and genetic polymorphism. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2021;24:94–112. doi: 10.18433/jpps31305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Duan L., Xue Z., Ji H., Zhang D., Wang Y. Effects of CYP2R1 gene variants on vitamin D levels and status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gene. 2018;678:361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Slater N.A., Rager M.L., Havrda D.E., Harralson A.F. Genetic variation in CYP2R1 and GC genes associated with vitamin D deficiency status. J. Pharm. Pract. 2017;30:31–36. doi: 10.1177/0897190015585876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Stroia C.M., Ghitea T.C., Vrânceanu M., Mureșan M., Bimbo-Szuhai E., Pallag C.R., Pallag A. Relationship between vitamin D3 deficiency, metabolic syndrome, and VDR, GC, and CYP2R1 gene polymorphisms. Nutrients. 2024;16:1272. doi: 10.3390/nu16091272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Safran M., Dalah I., Alexander J., Rosen N., Stein T.I., Shmoish M., Nativ N., Bahir I., Doniger T., Krug H., et al. GeneCards Version 3: The human gene integrator. Database. 2010;2010:baq020. doi: 10.1093/database/baq020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Agnello L., Scazzone C., Lo Sasso B., Ragonese P., Milano S., Salemi G., Ciaccio M. CYP27A1, CYP24A1, and RXR-α polymorphisms, vitamin D, and multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2018;66:77–84. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1152-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jones G., Prosser D.E., Kaufmann M. Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of vitamin D. J. Lipid Res. 2014;55:13–31. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R031534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sadykov M., Azizan A., Kozhamkulov U., Akilzhanova A., Yerezhepov D., Salfinger M., Chan C.K. Association of genetic variations in the vitamin D pathway with susceptibility to tuberculosis in Kazakhstan. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020;47:1659–1666. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05255-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang T.P., Chen S.S., Zhang G.Y., Shi S.J., Wei L., Li H.M. Association of vitamin D pathway genes polymorphisms with pulmonary tuberculosis susceptibility in a Chinese population. Genes Nutr. 2021;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12263-021-00687-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Abouzid M., Karaźniewicz-Łada M., Abdelazeem B., Brašić J.R. Research trends of vitamin D metabolism gene polymorphisms based on a bibliometric investigation. Genes. 2023;14:215. doi: 10.3390/genes14010215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fiedorowicz E. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1-alpha-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) gene: The risk of malignant tumors and other chronic diseases. Nutrients. 2020;12:801. doi: 10.3390/nu12030801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jenkinson C. The vitamin D metabolome: An update on analysis and function. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2019;37:408–423. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Selahvarzi H., Kamdideh M., Vahabi M., Dezhgir A., Houshmand M., Sadeghi S. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the VDR and CYP27B1 genes with the risk of developing vitamin D3 deficiency. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2021;15:201–211. doi: 10.22207/JPAM.15.1.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ramagopalan S.V., Dyment D.A., Cader M.Z., Morrison K.M., Disanto G., Morahan J.M., Berlanga-Taylor A.J., Handel A., De Luca G.C., Sadovnick A.D., et al. Rare variants in the CYP27B1 gene are associated with multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2011;70:881–886. doi: 10.1002/ana.22678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ruiz-Ballesteros A.I., Meza-Meza M.R., Vizmanos-Lamotte B., Parra-Rojas I., de la Cruz-Mosso U. Association of vitamin D metabolism gene polymorphisms with autoimmunity: Evidence in population genetic studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9626. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hureaux M., Chantot-Bastaraud S., Cassinari K., Casado E.M., Cuny A., Frébourg T., Vargas-Poussou R., Bréhin A.-C. When a maternal heterozygous mutation of the CYP24A1 gene leads to infantile hypercalcemia through a maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 20. Mol. Cytogenet. 2021;14:23. doi: 10.1186/s13039-021-00543-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sun H., Wang C., Hao M., Sun R., Wang Y., Liu T., Cong X., Liu Y. CYP24A1 is a potential biomarker for the progression and prognosis of human colorectal cancer. Hum. Pathol. 2016;50:101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jones G., Prosser D.E., Kaufmann M. 25-hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1): Its important role in the degradation of vitamin D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012;523:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bao Q., Wang D., Zhang Y., Bao L., Jia H. The impact of CYP24A1 polymorphisms on hypertension susceptibility. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2020;45:28–37. doi: 10.1159/000503925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hibler E.A., Klimentidis Y.C., Jurutka P.W., Kohler L.N., Lance P., Roe D.J., Thompson P.A., Jacobs E.T. CYP24A1 and CYP27B1 polymorphisms, concentrations of vitamin D metabolites, and odds of colorectal adenoma recurrence. Nutr. Cancer. 2015;67:1131–1141. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2015.1068818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang M., Zhang R., Wang M., Zhang L., Ding Y., Tang Z., Wang H., Zhang W., Chen Y., Wang J. Genetic polymorphism of vitamin D family genes CYP2R1, CYP24A1, and CYP27B1 are associated with a high risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A case-control study. Front. Genet. 2021;12:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.717533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Penna-Martinez M., Ramos-Lopez E., Stern J., Kahles H., Hinsch N., Hansmann M.-L., Selkinski I., Grünwald F., Vorlaender C., O Bechstein W., et al. Impaired vitamin D activation and association with CYP24A1 haplotypes in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2012;22:709–716. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kumar P., Henikoff S., Ng P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:1073–1081. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Adzhubei I.A., Schmidt S., Peshkin L., Ramensky V.E., Gerasimova A., Bork P., Kondrashov A.S., Sunyaev S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang J.T., Lin C.J., Burridge S.M., Fu G.K., Labuda M., Portale A.A., Miller W.L. Genetics of vitamin D 1α-hydroxylase deficiency in 17 families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998;63:1694–1702. doi: 10.1086/302156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chan J.K., Kaplan L.E., Perwad F., Huang N., Sharma A., Choi Y., Miller W.L., Portale A. Vitamin D 1α-hydroxylase gene mutations in patients with 1α-hydroxylase deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:3177–3182. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cui N., Xia W., Su H., Pang L., Jiang Y., Sun Y., Nie M., Xing X., Li M., Wang O., et al. Novel mutations of CYP27B1 gene lead to reduced activity of 1α-hydroxylase in Chinese patients. Bone. 2012;51:563–569. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Durmaz E., Zou M., Al-Rijjal R.A., Bircan I., Akçurin S., Meyer B., Shi Y. Clinical and genetic analysis of patients with vitamin D-dependent rickets type 1A. Clin. Endocrinol. 2012;77:363–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bosworth C., de Boer I.H. Impaired vitamin D metabolism in CKD. Semin. Nephrol. 2023;33:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2012.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ban M., Caillier S., Mero I.L., Myhr K.M., Celius E.G., Aarseth J., Torkildsen Ø., Harbo H.F., Oksenberg J., Hauser S.L., et al. No evidence of association between mutant alleles of the CYP27B1 gene and multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2015;73:430–432. doi: 10.1002/ana.23833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cheng J.B., Levine M.A., Bell N.H., Mangelsdorf D.J., Russell D.W. Genetic evidence that the human CYP2R1 enzyme is a key vitamin D 25-hydroxylase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:7711–7715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402490101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Al Mutair A.N., Nasrat G.H., Russell D.W. Mutation of the CYP2R1 Vitamin D 25-Hydroxylase in a Saudi Arabian Family with Severe Vitamin D Deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;97:E2022–E2025. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ozden A., Doneray H., Turkyilmaz A. Two novel CYP2R1 mutations in a family with vitamin D-dependent rickets type 1b. Endocrine. 2021;72:825–864. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02670-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Thacher T.D., Fischer P.R., Singh R.J., Roizen J., Levine M.A. CYP2R1 mutations impair generation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cause an atypical form of vitamin D deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;100:E1005–E1013. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M., Aldhalaan W., Alashwal A., Bin-Abbas B.S., Alsagheir A., Alotaiby M., Rafiq Z., Zaidi S.H.E. Hereditary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-resistant rickets (HVDRR): Clinical heterogeneity and long-term efficacious management of eight patients from four unrelated Arab families with a loss of function VDR mutation. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;31:861–868. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2017-0312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Malloy P.J., Pike J.W., Feldman D. The vitamin D receptor and the syndrome of hereditary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-resistant rickets. Endocr. Rev. 1999;20:156–188. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.2.0359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ritchie H.H., Hughes M.R., Thompson E.T., Malloy P.J., Hochberg Z., Feldman D., Pike J.W., O’Malley B.W. An ochre mutation in the vitamin D receptor gene causes hereditary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-resistant rickets in three families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:9783–9787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Forghani N., Lum C., Krishnan S., Wang J., Wilson D.M., Blackett P.R., Malloy P.J., Feldman D. Two new unrelated cases of hereditary 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-resistant rickets with alopecia resulting from the same novel nonsense mutation in the vitamin D receptor gene. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;23:843–850. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2010.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Shangguan J., Zhang W., Zhu X., Zheng Y., Xue R., Xiao L., Liu G. Allele C of rs6068816 in the CYP24A1 Gene is Associated with Increased Risk of Hyperuricemia in the Chinese Population: A Case-Control Study. Discov. Med. 2024;36:2224–2230. doi: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202436190.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fan H.Z., Zhang R., Tian T., Zhong Y.L., Wu M.P., Xie C.N., Yang J.J., Huang P., Yu R.B., Zhang Y., et al. CYP24A1 Genetic Variants in the Vitamin D Metabolic Pathway Are Involved in the Outcomes of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among High-Risk Chinese Population. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;84:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Malhotra S., Midaglia L., Chuquisana O., Patsopoulos N.A., Ferrer R., Giralt M., Fissolo N., Gil-Varea E., Triviño J.C., Lünemann J.D., et al. The CYP24A1 Gene Variant rs2762943 Is Associated with Low Serum 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D Levels in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Eur. J. Neurol. 2023;30:2401–2410. doi: 10.1111/ene.15866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Young K.A., Munroe M.E., Guthridge J.M., Kamen D.L., Niewold T.B., Gilkeson G.S., Weisman M.H., Ishimori M.L., Kelly J., Gaffney P.M., et al. Combined Role of Vitamin D Status and CYP24A1 in the Transition to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:153–158. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.O’Seaghdha C.M., Wu H., Yang Q., Kapur K., Guessous I., Zuber A.M., Köttgen A., Stoudmann C., Teumer A., Kutalik Z., et al. Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies Identifies Six New Loci for Serum Calcium Concentrations. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Muindi J.R., Adjei A.A., Wu Z.R., Olson I., Huang H., Groman A., Tian L., Singh P.K., Sucheston L.E., Johnson C.S., et al. Serum Vitamin D Metabolites in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Cholecalciferol Supplementation: Correlation with Polymorphisms in the Vitamin D Genes. Horm. Cancer. 2013;4:242–250. doi: 10.1007/s12672-013-0139-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yu S., Li X., Wang Y., Mao Z., Wang C., Ba Y., Li W. Transmission Disequilibrium of rs4809957 in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Families and Its Association with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Family-Based Case-Control Study. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32:406–410. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yu H., Zhang Z., Liu J., Hu P., Liu Z. Association Study Between Genetic Variants in Vitamin D Metabolism-Related Genes and Childhood Autism Spectrum Disorder. Metab. Brain Dis. 2020;35:971–978. doi: 10.1007/s11011-020-00570-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available with the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Journal of Personalized Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES