Table 3.
Studies of biologic and small molecule therapies using novel patient-reported outcomes in UC.
| Study | Treatment | Key study details and findings |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal bleeding plus stool frequency (PRO2) | ||
| Post hoc analysis of GEMINI 1, GEMINI 2, and GEMINI 389 | Vedolizumab |
PRO2 clinical remission = RB of 0 and SF ≤ 1A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved PRO2 clinical remission in the vedolizumab group (n = 225) than the placebo group (n = 149) at weeks 2, 4, and 6 overall and in anti-TNFα-naive patient subgroups vedolizumab-treated (n = 130) and placebo-treated (n = 76). No treatment differences among anti-TNFα-experienced patients.Vedolizumab vs placebo, overall
|
| Post hoc analysis of UNIFI90 | Ustekinumab | PRO2 clinical remission = RB of 0 and SF ≤ 1At week 2, ustekinumab-treated patients in the 130 mg IV (n = 320) and ~6 mg/kg IV (n = 322) dose groups achieved a significantly higher rate of PRO2 clinical remission (20.0%; P = .015) and (20.2%; P = .012) compared with (12.9%) for patients in the placebo group (n = 319)The percentage of patients achieving PRO2 clinical remission increased from baseline through week 16 for both ustekinumab groups |
| Post hoc analysis SELECTION trial91 | Filgotinib | PRO2 clinical remission = RB of 0 and SF ≤ 1PRO2 clinical remission was significantly higher in patients treated filgotinib 200 mg (n = 262) vs placebo (n = 142) by day 9 in biologic-naive patients (18.8% vs 9.5%; P = .0144) and by day 7 in biologic-experienced patients (10.7% vs 4.2%; P = .0155) |
| Post hoc analysis of OCTAVE clinical program92 | Tofacitanib | PRO2 clinical remission = RB of 0 and SF ≤ 1After 52-week maintenance tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily treatment in the OCTAVE Sustain study, 172 patients in remission continued treatment in the 4-year OCTAVE Open study; 84/172 (48.0%) were in PRO2 clinical remission by month 48 |
| Prospective cohort study93 | Vedolizumab and tofacitinib | PRO2 clinical remission = RB of 0 and SF ≤ 1 as a secondary endpointNo difference between vedolizumab-treated (n = 72) and tofacitinib-treated (n = 33) patients achieving PRO2 remission at month 6 |
| Bowel urgency | ||
| Post hoc analysis of induction study U-ACHIEVE94 | Upadacitinib |
Bowel urgency was recorded daily by the patient via electronic diary reporting on the previous 24 hoursAt week 8, a higher proportion of patients who received upadacitinib 15-45 mg vs placebo-treated patients reported no bowel urgency
|
| Post hoc analysis of U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH95 | Upadacitinib |
Bowel urgency was recorded daily by the patient via electronic diary reporting on the previous 24 hoursA larger proportion of upadacitinib-treated patients (n = 660) reported no bowel urgency compared with the placebo group (n = 328) at weeks 2-8 and at week 52Percent of patients reporting no bowel urgency induction treatment, upadacitinib vs placebo
|
| LUCENT I and LUCENT II96 | Mirikizumab | Bowel urgency measured on the UNRS from daily patient-recorded information on the severity of bowel urgencyAt week 12, reduction from baseline UNRS (least squares mean ± SE) was −2.59 ± 0.08 in mirikizumab-treated patients (n = 868) vs −1.63 ± 0.1 for the placebo group (n = 294); P < .001At week 52, mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized to mirikizumab (n = 365) or placebo (n = 179) reported a significantly greater mean UNRS change from induction baseline in mirikizumab-treated patients −3.80 ± 0.14 than the placebo group −2.74 ± 0.20; P < .001 |
| Subset of patients with proctitis in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 1297 | Etrasimod | Bowel urgency measured on the UNRS in patients with isolated proctitisAt week 12, reduction from baseline UNRS (least squares mean) was −2.76 in etrasimod-treated patients (n = 35) vs −0.16 in the placebo group (n = 16), difference −2.60 (95% CI: −4.47-0.73); P < .007. No treatment-related differences at week 52 |
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; QD, once daily; RB, rectal bleeding; SF, stool frequency; UNRS, Urgency Numerical Rating Scale.