Table 4.
Extracted results of bullying and cyberbullying in youth aged 10–16 years.
Role | Type of bullying | Boys | Girls | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean difference | Risk | Mean difference | Risk | |||
Victims | Bullying | N/A | N/A | −7.3% Critical Thinking | x1.3 < Elaboration x1.3 < Organization |
|
Cyberbullying | N/A | x1.6 < Metacognitive self-regulation | −3.8% Rehearsal −5.4% Elaboration −2.9% Organization −3.5% Critical Thinking −5.5% Metacognitive self-regulation |
x1.7 < Rehearsal x2.1 < Elaboration x2.8 < Metacognitive self-regulation |
||
Aggressors | Bullying | +5.5% Critical Thinking | x1.4 < Metacognitive self-regulation | −3.2% Rehearsal −6.8% Elaboration −5.5% Organization −5.4% Critical Thinking −4.9% Metacognitive self-regulation |
x1.8 < Rehearsal x1.8 < Elaboration x1.3 < Critical thinking x1.6 < Metacognitive self-regulation |
|
Cyberbullying | +4.5% Critical Thinking | x1.8 < Rehearsal x2.5 < Metacognitive self-regulation |
−2.6% Rehearsal −5.5% Elaboration −4.8% Critical Thinking −4.7% Metacognitive self-regulation |
x2.3 < Rehearsal x2.6 < Elaboration x1.6 < Critical Thinking x3.9 < Metacognitive self-regulation |
N/A, not applicable. Data differentiated by role (victim/aggressor) and gender.