Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 14;16:1569400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569400

Table 4.

Extracted results of bullying and cyberbullying in youth aged 10–16 years.

Role Type of bullying Boys Girls
Mean difference Risk Mean difference Risk
Victims Bullying N/A N/A −7.3% Critical Thinking x1.3 < Elaboration
x1.3 < Organization
Cyberbullying N/A x1.6 < Metacognitive self-regulation −3.8% Rehearsal
−5.4% Elaboration
−2.9% Organization
−3.5% Critical Thinking
−5.5% Metacognitive self-regulation
x1.7 < Rehearsal
x2.1 < Elaboration
x2.8 < Metacognitive self-regulation
Aggressors Bullying +5.5% Critical Thinking x1.4 < Metacognitive self-regulation −3.2% Rehearsal
−6.8% Elaboration
−5.5% Organization
−5.4% Critical Thinking
−4.9% Metacognitive self-regulation
x1.8 < Rehearsal
x1.8 < Elaboration x1.3 < Critical thinking
x1.6 < Metacognitive self-regulation
Cyberbullying +4.5% Critical Thinking x1.8 < Rehearsal
x2.5 < Metacognitive self-regulation
−2.6% Rehearsal
−5.5% Elaboration
−4.8% Critical Thinking
−4.7% Metacognitive self-regulation
x2.3 < Rehearsal
x2.6 < Elaboration
x1.6 < Critical Thinking
x3.9 < Metacognitive self-regulation

N/A, not applicable. Data differentiated by role (victim/aggressor) and gender.