Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Apr 27;15:14734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99895-9

Epidemiology and predictors of suicide and suicide attempt in Northwest Iran: a pilot study for local prevention strategies

Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani 1, Hosein Azizi 1,2,, Ayyoub Malek 1, Vahab Aslrahimi 3, Mortaza Hassanpour 3, Parinaz Kalejahi 1, Farzad Khodamoradi 4
PMCID: PMC12034810  PMID: 40289233

Abstract

The suicide rate in Bonab County, northwest Iran, has been reported to exceed 16 per 100,000. To develop and implement an effective suicide prevention program (SPP) at the local level in this County, a population-based epidemiological study was conducted to investigate factors associated with suicide and suicide attempts (SA). In this population and registry-based descriptive-analytical study, all deaths of suicide and SA from 2021 to 2023 were analyzed. Data were collected through a population-based registry for suicide and using community health workers in primary care. The study compared epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors between suicide and SA. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders and calculated the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for the likelihood of suicide compared to attempts. During 2021–2023, the suicide rates were 16.2, 11.44, and 12.08, while the SA rates were 212, 234, and 237 per 100,000 people. Overall, the suicide rate decreased, whereas the SA rate increased during this period. In the final analysis, males (AOR = 1.97: 1.2–3.6), individuals aged 35–60 (AOR = 1.56: 1.01–3.7), hanging (AOR = 7.4: 2.6–14.2), family conflicts (AOR = 2.65: 1.8–6.13), stressful life events (AOR = 1.25: 1.1–3.9), and unemployment (AOR = 1.8: 1.04–3.5) were associated with an increased likelihood of suicide. The suicide rate in this county surpasses the national average. Predictors of suicide and SA exhibit fundamental differences in this County. The study identified family conflicts, stressful life events, the hanging method, male gender, unemployment, and adult age as reliable predictors for suicide, while factors such as having psychiatric disorders, previous SA, and being female were linked to SA. These factors should be taken into account when developing SPP in Bonab County. Furthermore, the study highlights the need to consider various socioeconomic and cultural factors when developing SPP.

Keywords: Suicide prevention, Suicidal behaviors, Mental disorder, Epidemiology

Subject terms: Public health, Epidemiology

Introduction

Annually, nearly one million people worldwide die by suicide. However, this figure represents only the tip of the iceberg, owing to the absence of effective suicide prevention programs, underreporting of suicides, and various social stigmas1,2. Despite this underreporting, suicide is the second leading cause of death among people aged 15 to 29, with most cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Since 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a global mental health action plan to reduce suicide by 10% by 2020 in all countries3. However, only 18% of countries have a suicide registration system. Most national and comprehensive suicide prevention programs (around 38 programs) have been established in developed countries. In contrast, suicide rates have increased significantly in LMICs over the past few decades46.

Based on the latest estimates, the global age-standardized suicide rate for 2019 was 9.0 per 100,000 population, while the age-adjusted suicide rate increased to 14.21 per 100,000 people in 20227. According to the current meta-analysis in Iran, the prevalence of suicide attempts (SA) is 131 cases per 100,000 people, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 124–137. The prevalence of SA is 152 per 100,000 in women and 128 per 100,000 in men. The prevalence of death by suicide is 8.14 per 100,000 people, with a 95% CI of 7.8–8.5. Suicide rate is 5 per 100,000 in women and 9.1 per 100,000 in men8. Other reports indicate that the suicide rate in Iran is 6.8%, which is lower than the global rate, ranking 58th among countries worldwide9.

There has been limited research on suicide trends and rates in East Azerbaijan Province. The four-year suicide prevention project in Malekan County, which took place from 2015 to 2018, is among the few impactful longitudinal studies. This community-based suicide prevention program was integrated into the county’s healthcare system in collaboration with the Health Deputy at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Various strategies were developed and implemented to prevent and reduce suicides and SA. The findings of this study indicated that the rates of suicide, SA, and re-attempts have declined4. Another epidemiological study in East Azerbaijan Province analyzed the 12-year trend of suicide-related deaths using data from the Forensic Medicine registration system and the Mortality Registration system of the Ministry of Health from 2007 to 2018. The study indicated that the incidence rate of suicide in this province has been steadily increasing. Specifically, the incidence rate of suicide rose from 2.7 per 100,000 people in 2014 to 5.65 per 100,000 people in 201810.

Zeinalzadeh et al. estimated the rate of SA in East Azerbaijan Province to be 101 per 100,000 population in 2010. The rate of SA was higher in women (63.7%) compared to men (36.3%). The mortality rate from suicide among individuals who attempted suicide was generally estimated to be 2.7%, with this ratio being 4.9% for men and 1.3% for women. Studies have shown that the most common method of suicide for both genders is drug overdose. Variables such as male gender, occupation, marital status, and education level have had a significant correlation with death from suicide11. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in Iran indicated that mental illness, particularly depressive disorders and family conflicts, are the most prevalent risk factors for suicide attempts12.

Most Muslim countries had lower age-standardized suicide rates than the global average13,14. Suicide is generally an under-researched and poorly understood issue in Muslim-majority countries15. However, the suicide rate in northwest Iran- Bonab County has been reported to be more than 16.2 per 100,000 people in 2021. Identifying local risk factors related to suicide in this context can be useful not only at the national level but also for Islamic countries for suicide prevention1517. Bonab County is situated in northwestern Iran, within East Azerbaijan Province. According to the latest census, the total population of this county is 149,100 (61.5% urban and 38.5% rural), and all residents are Muslim.

Currently, to control and reduce the suicide rate in Bonab County, a longitudinal suicide prevention program (SPP) is being conducted by the health system in two phases: development and implementation. Since the determinants of suicide and SA vary at the local level, identifying the predictors and risk factors of suicide and SA was essential for developing an effective SPP. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the epidemiological status of suicide and suicide attempts, along with the associated risk factors of suicide in Bonab County. Another objective is to utilize the findings from this pilot study to develop suicide prevention interventions within the healthcare system of this County.

Methods

Study population and setting

A population and registry-based study using a descriptive-analytical design was conducted in Bonab County, northwest Iran. The target population of the study comprised all cases of suicides (deaths) and suicide attempters (SAs) in Bonab County from 2021 to 2023 who were recorded in the suicide registry system. Likewise, the study sample size comprised all suicides and suicide attempters who were recorded in the registry for suicide system during 2021 to 2023. Given the high suicide rate in Bonab County, a suicide prevention program (SPP) using a mega-project has been developed with two main strategies: “development” and “implementation.”

The present study follows the first phase-stage (development) with the aim of understanding the epidemiological profile and risk factors associated with suicide at the local level. Its goal is to inform the design of effective interventions. The current study first calculated the incidence rate of suicide and SA during 2021-23 at the population level using the suicide registry system and population census statistics, and then compared the risk factors between suicide and SA.

Data collection

Baseline and epidemiological data

Data related to suicide and SA were extracted from the national suicide registration system. In this registration system, all cases of suicide and SA are recorded by medical universities. The study extracted suicide and SA cases recorded between 2021 and 2023, along with their demographic characteristics. In suicide registration system, demographic characteristics, the history of any suicidal behaviors, mental illness, and other clinical risk factors were recorded. These data were recorded in the electronic system using community healthcare providers. Community healthcare providers have face-to-face contact with large numbers of community members as part of their usual routine performance in Iran5.

Stressful life events

In this study any acute and chronic stressful life event (SLE) and family conflicts were collected. Family conflicts was defined as any disagreement, conflicts, or familial discord with spouse and/or a first-degree family member. SLE was also defined as any stressful and/or negative life events in the past year. The study collected the history of any SLE based on the validated Persian version of the Holms and Rahe questionnaire18 from all suicide (the first degree family) and SAs (themselves). The questionnaire was validated by Roohafza et al. in Iran among 3,951 adults aged 18 years and older. The Cronbach’s alpha index for the questionnaire was 92%, and its validity and correlation with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) were found to be appropriate19. This questionnaire consists of 43 items measuring various common stressful life events that have occurred in the past year for respondents to answer. Some important SLE in this questionnaire include the death of a spouse or children, divorce, separation/distance between spouses, death of close family members, severe personal injury or illness, marriage, retirement, sexual problems, major financial changes, major life changes, and marital discord, among others. The Persian version of this tool has previously been used in the study area in a study related to suicide20.

We relied on community healthcare providers to gather reliable and valid data. As part of the Iranian healthcare system, these providers typically follow up and care for patients under their coverage, thus maintaining direct contact and communication with the general population4,21.

Analysis

Data were analyzed using Stata version 14 software. This study was a population-based study using the registry for suicide. The total population of the Bonab County by year and all suicides and attempters were available. The incidence of suicide and SA were calculated by dividing the number of events (suicide or SA) by the at-risk population per 100,000 people. The chi-square test was carried out to compare categorized variables. The independent T-test (if normal) and Mann-Whitney test (if non-normal) were used to compare quantitative data. All variables with P-values less than 0.2 in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis after assessing the potential confounding role of the variables using a Directed acyclic graph (DAG) and prior knowledge22. Multiple logistic regression analysis was utilized to estimate the crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for the risk of suicide and attempted suicide with a 95% confidence interval23.

Results

Descriptive results: incidence of suicide and SA

Overall, 59 suicides and 683 SA were recorded in Bonab County during the years 2021 to 2023. Table 1 demonstrates the incidence rates of suicide and SA in Bonab during the years 2021 to 2023. The suicide rate during these years was reported as 16.2, 11.44, and 12.08 per 100,000 population, respectively, while the suicide attempt rate was reported as 212, 234, and 237 per 100,000 population, respectively. This indicates a decreasing trend (from 16.2 to 12.08 per 100,000 population) in suicide cases but an increasing trend in SA (from 212 to 237 per 100,000 population).

Table 1.

Rates of suicide and SA in Bonab County by years.

Year Population Rate of Suicide Rate of Suicide Attempted
N = 59 Rate* N = 683 Rate*
2023 149,100 18 12.08 237 159.0
2022 148,600 17 11.44 234 157.5
2021 148,100 24 16.2 212 143.1

* Cumulative incidence rate (Per 100.000 persons).

Analytical results

Table 2 shows the scio-demographic characteristics and baseline features of individuals involved in suicide and SA in Bonab County. More than 64% of suicide cases occurred in males, while the majority of SA were in females (54.6%). There was a significant association between death by suicide and male gender (P = 0.006). Significant associations were also found regarding age and occupation with suicide (P < 0.05). In terms of age group, the age group of 15 to 34 years was the most common age group for both suicide (52.5%) and SA (68%). The age group of 35 to 60 years accounted for approximately 40% of suicides, whereas only 22.2% of SA were in this age group. Significant associations were also observed between occupational groups and the distribution of suicide and SA (P = 0.012).

Table 2.

Socio-demographic characteristics of suicides and suicide attempters in Bonab County (2021-23).

Variables Attempters
683 (92.05%)
Suicides
59 (7.95%)
P-value
Sex Female 373 (54.6) 21 (35.6) 0.006
Male 316 (45.4) 38 (64.4)
Age 5–14 42 (6.15) 1 (1.7) 0.023
15–34 465 (68.1) 31 (52.5)
35–60 152 (22.25) 20 (33.9)
> 60 24 (3.5) 7 (11.8)
Occupation Housewife 267 (39.1) 11 (18.6) 0.012
Unemployed 58 (8.5) 8 (13.5)
Student (school or university) 170 (24.9) 7 (11.8)
Free 32 (4.7) 5 (8.5)
Worker (labor) 43 (6.3) 9 (15.2)
Others 113 (16.5) 19 (32.2)
Marital status Single 248 (36.3) 21 (35.6) 0.789
Married 382 (55.9) 33 (55.9)
Widow and divorced 38 (5.5) 3 (5.0)
Unknown 15 (2.2) 2 (3.4)
Educational level Primary school 40 (5.8) 4 (6.8) 0.432
Secondary school 571 (83.6) 44 (74.6)
High School and Academic 44 (6.4) 5 (8.5)

Housewifes accounted for 39% of SA but were involved in 18.6% of death by suicides. Furthermore, the rate of suicide was higher compared to the rate of SA in unemployed individuals (13.5 vs. 8.5), self-employed individuals (8.5 vs. 4.7), and laborers (15.2 vs. 6.3). Both suicide and SA were more common in married individuals. Suicide and SA were more common among married individuals and those with an average level of education. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the frequencies of suicide and SA in terms of marital status and education level subgroups (P > 0.05).

Table 3 indicates the frequency distribution of suicide and SA categorized by suicide methods, previous SA, psychiatric disorders, family conflicts, and stressful life events (SLE). Of individuals who committed suicide, 11.3% had a history of prior SA, compared to 6.15% of individuals who attempted suicide. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.166).

Table 3.

Risk factors for suicide and suicide attempted in Bonab County (2021-23).

Variables Suicide
92 (7.95%)
Suicide attempted
683(92.05%)
95% CI P-value
History of SA Yes 6 (11.3) 107 (15.6) 0.54 (0.18–1.31) 0.166
No 53 (88.6) 561 (84.4) -
Methods Hanging 44 (74.6) 14 (2.1) 17.9 (7.3–43.8) 0.001
Any poisoning 9 (15.2) 515 (75.4) 1 1
Others* 6 (10.2) 154 (22.5) 2.2 (0.64–7.1) 0.124
History of psychiatric disorders Yes 16 (27.1) 165 (24.2) 1.16 (0.6–2.18) 0.611
No 43 (72.9) 518 (75.8) 1
History of stressful life events** Yes 36 (61.0) 282 (41.6) 2.21 (1.25–4.01) 0.0035
No 23 (39.0) 399 (58.4) 1
Any family conflicts Yes 45 (76.3) 332 (48.6) 3.65 (1.9–7.5) 0.001
No 13 (23.7) 351(51.4) 1

* Self-injury, jumping from height, self-immolation, intentional accident, ….

** In the last 12 months.

There was a significant difference between individuals who died by suicide and those who attempted suicide in terms of suicide method (p = 0.001). Nearly 75% of suicide cases chose the violent method of hanging, which significantly increased the chance of death (OR = 17.9; 7.3–43.8). Conversely, exactly the opposite was observed in individuals who attempted suicide, where 75% of cases occurred due to poisoning.

There was a history of psychiatric disorders in individuals who committed suicide and those who attempted suicide (27% vs. 24.2%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.611). However, the study found a statistically significant difference in the frequency of suicide and SA in individuals with a history of family conflicts and stressful life events (P < 0.05). Specifically, having a family conflict increased the chance of suicide by 3.65 times, and experiencing a stressful life event in the past year increased the possibility of fatal suicide by 2.21 times.

Table 4 displays the results of multiple logistic regression analysis, indicating the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of suicide risk with a 95% confidence interval after controlling for the potential confounders. After controlling for potential confounding variables, being male (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.2–3.6), the age group of 35 to 60 years (AOR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.01–3.7), suicide by hanging (AOR = 7.4; 95% CI: 2.6–14.2), having a family conflict (AOR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.8–6.13), a stressful life event in the past year (AOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.1–3.9), and unemployment (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.04–3.5) significantly increased the odds of fatal suicide.

Table 4.

Results of multiple logistic regression* analysis to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the risk of suicide.

Variables Adjusted OR 95% CI P-value
Age 5–14 0.35 (0.08–2.2) 0.261
15–34 1 1
35–60 1.56 (1.01–3.7) 0.032
> 60 2.1 (0.71–6.2) 0.163
Sex Female 1 1
Male 1.97 (1.2–3.6) 0.022
Occupation Housewife 1 1
Unemployed 1.8 (1.04–3.5) 0.042
Student (school or university) 1.1 (0.42–2.2) 0.895
Free 1.98 (0.92–4.7) 0.129
Worker (labor) 1.7 (1.0–9.7) 0.038
Others 1.6 (0.75–4.4) 0.213
Hanging method 7.4 (2.6–14.2) 0.001
Psychiatric disorders 1.02 (0.27–1.3) 0.355
Stressful life events 1.25 (1. 1–3.9) 0.035
Family conflicts 2.65 (1.8–6.13) 0.002
History of SA 0.68 (0.11–1.8) 0.238

*Adjusted for educational level and marital status.

Discussion

Incidence of suicide

This population and registry-based study found that the incidence rate of suicide in Bonab County is higher than the national average, with a decreasing trend from 16.2 per 100,000 individuals in 2021 to 12 per 100,000 individuals in 2023. In contrast, the trend of SA has shown a slight increasing slope, from 212 per 100,000 individuals in 2021 to 237 per 100,000 individuals in 2023. Therefore, the evidence highlights the necessity of implementing interventions to prevent suicide and SA in this county.

A meta-analysis by Asadiyun M et al. (2023) in Iran found that the prevalence of SA is 131 cases per 100,000 individuals, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 124 to 137. The prevalence of death by suicide is also 8.14 per 100,000 individuals, with a 95% CI of 7.8 to 8.5. This rate is 5 and 9.1 per 100,000 individuals for women and men, respectively8. Other reports indicate that the suicide rate in Iran is 6.8 per 100,000 persons, which is lower than the global rate and ranks 58th among countries worldwide9.

Bonab County is located in northwestern Iran, in East Azerbaijan Province. A similar epidemiological survey in East Azerbaijan Province from 2007 to 2018 showed a slight increase in suicides in this province10. Consistent with our findings, the above study mentioned hanging as the most common method chosen by suicide victims8,10. In the current study, 75% of suicide cases committed by hanging, which increased the risk of death. Hanging is a very violent method of ending one’s life, with a very low chance of survival if nobody intervenes. Therefore, effective interventions should be implemented by the healthcare system of Bonab County to prevent this violent method. Consistent with the present study, Hajebi et al.24 and Mahdavi et al.25 identified hanging as the most common method of suicide among all suicide cases in Iran. A recent meta-analysis conducted in Iran estimated the pooled prevalence rates of suicide among males (64.3%), individuals over 25 years old (57.9%), those with less than a diploma (73.4%), people facing employment issues (66.4%), urban residents (61.7%), individuals with a past medical history (8.5%), those with a past psychiatric history (20.7%), previous suicide attempts (12.2%), a history of substance abuse (28.4%), occurrences in the spring season (29.8%), and the hanging method (46.1%)26. Another study in Iran indicated that the average incidence rates of self-harm attempts and suicide among individuals aged 10–39 years were 93.87 and 7.55 per 100,000 individuals, respectively27.

Associated risk factors for suicide

The present study showed a significant difference in age and sex between suicide and SA. Similar previous studies in Iran and worldwide reported that suicide was more common in men4,28, while SA were more prevalent in women29. Women often chose poisoning as the method for SA. SA were more common among individuals aged 14 to 34, and suicides resulting in death were more frequently reported in the age group of 34 to 60. This suggests that the intention to commit suicide is more severe and poses a greater danger in adults, highlighting the need to adopt interventions to prevent suicide and taking into account the factors that increase the risk of suicide in adults.

One of the most significant findings of the present study was the association of suicide with family conflicts. Family conflicts with a spouse or a family member increase the risk of suicide. These findings have also been demonstrated in a meta-analysis of suicide studies in Iran30,31, highlighting family conflicts as strong predictors of suicidal behavior. According to the results of a case-control study in Iran, family issues, especially early marriage, have increased the likelihood of suicidal behavior23. Empowering individuals and developing life skills to manage and mitigate family conflicts, particularly between couples, as well as addressing the issue of early marriage—which is prevalent in this context—should be prioritized in suicide prevention programs by health managers and policymakers32.

Stressful life events were another identified risk factor in the current study. Individuals who had experienced at least one stressful life event in the past year were at a higher risk of suicide20,33. A study by Azizi et al. in Malekan County, Iran, identified stressful life events as one of the suicide risk factors20,33. Several studies have also highlighted stressful life events as a notable risk factor34 especially in the Asian context. For example, Arafat et al. found that stressful life events were responsible for the largest proportion of suicide deaths in Bangladesh35. In a study involving 547 Asian outpatients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, recruited from China, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan, negative life events and social support were significantly linked to suicidality in female patients with depression36. In another study in Southeast Asia, stressful life events were found to be the most common risk factors among suicidal patients37. Acute stressful events, especially among adolescents and young adults, can increase impulsive suicides, necessitating attention and planning by healthcare systems for suicide prevention34. Recent studies indicate that even stressful situations, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, can elevate suicidal behaviors38,39.

In the present study, unemployed and self-employed individuals were at a higher risk of suicide. The association between suicide and occupation and economic issues can be explored in Durkheim’s theory40. Durkheim’s structural approach to suicide, along with his sociological theories, led to the development of a complex concept of suicide. Large-scale European empirical studies support the impact of unemployment on suicide rates. These studies have shown that a 1% increase in unemployment leads to a 0.09% increase in the suicide rate (per 100,000 people)41. It is noteworthy considering that the unemployment rate in men peaks during their working ages, although other studies do not confirm this relationship42,43. Regarding economic parameters, an increase in gross domestic product (GDP) and gross value added (GVA) shows a negative correlation with suicide rates in Europe41. An Italian study that examined the relationship between inflation, employment status, and suicidal behavior in a classified sample demonstrated that unemployed individuals are at a higher risk of suicide, especially those who were previously employed44. The change in social status resulting from job loss imposes greater vulnerability to inflation compared to those who have never worked. These studies indicate a complex interplay of socio-economic factors influencing suicidal behavior, which remains an open question. Therefore, investigating some sociological theories related to economic factors along with aspects related to mental illness seems essential, and we believe they should be carefully considered in the suicide discourse40.

These economic, structural, and socio-cultural issues are considered barriers to the implementation of suicide prevention programs. These findings challenge single-factor intervention models in reducing suicide and underscore the necessity of considering a wide range of background and socio-economic and socio-cultural factors when implementing suicide prevention programs1,3.

A community-based study by Azizi et al. in Malekan County (adjacent to Bonab County, the area under the current study) during the years 2015 to 2018 aimed to prevent and reduce suicide. According to the health needs assessment of Malekan County Health Center, suicide was identified as a priority problem. The implementers conducted the following interventions in collaboration with the regional health system and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences: searching and collecting the highest level of evidence in suicide prevention, consultation with experts, reporting to the health system, improving suicide registration coverage, researching to identify local risk factors, Follow-up and care for suicide attempters, identifying and caring for depression and other psychiatric disorders, training and retraining health service providers, and conducting educational campaigns and raising awareness in high-risk areas. According to the reported results, the incidence of suicide and SA decreased from 11.22 to 2.63 and 203 to 157 per 100,000 people, respectively, from 2015 to 2018. The rate of re-attempted suicide also reduced from 12% in 2015 to 6.7% in 2018. Overall, at the end of the study, suicide, SA, and re-attempts decreased by 75%, 22%, and 42%, respectively4.

The results of this study can be used for the development of suicide prevention programs and suicide research in Bonab County and similar Iranian contexts. This study also provides a broad outlook for bridging the gap between research and field programs and/or policies, emphasizing the need for suicide prevention programs in the community4,45, media campaign46, and hospital settings28,47, as well as pre-hospital settings. All of these aspects underscore the need to strengthen awareness about suicide behavior and evaluate the effectiveness of the national health approach in addressing suicide issues.

Strengthens and limitations

This study aimed to identify predictors and associated factors for suicide and SA, and to use the results of this study to develop and implement effective suicide prevention interventions at the local level. The main strength of this study was its population-based study using the suicide registry system, which encompassed the entire population of individuals targeted for suicide and attempt. However, the study had some limitations. Suicide is a multifactorial outcome affected by various clinical, personal, and socio-cultural characteristics as potential confounders, and the current study may not have measured or collected all of these factors. Therefore, to obtain detailed and in-depth information, face-to-face interviews may be needed, but suicides could not be accessed due to death, and this is part of the inevitable limitation of suicide studies. Nonetheless, to solve this problem, the study used the registered information of the health system and community health workers to collect detailed valid and reliable data (to reduce differential and non-differential misclassification). The study also used multiple logistic regression analysis to adjust the impact of potential confounders and to estimate AORs with 95% CIs. The study also used community health workers to collect reliable and valid data. Secondly, it is necessary to have control groups without suicidal behaviors to accurately identify the risk factors associated with suicide. To address this issue, we compared suicides with suicide attempters at the population level.

Another concern was the relatively brief period of three years to evaluate suicide trends. However, the primary aim of this study was to identify the predictors and risk factors of suicide and SA to inform the health system in the design and implementation of the SPP. By gathering three years of data, the study aimed to provide more precise information for developing effective interventions.

Conclusions

The rate of suicide in Bonab County is higher than the national average (according to meta-analysis studies). Predictors such as family conflicts, experiencing stressful life events, suicide by hanging, being male, unemployment and the adult age group are identified as risk factors for suicide death. Additionally, variables such as having psychiatric disorders, previous SA, and being female are recognized as risk factors for SA. These factors can be considered in designing effective interventions for suicide prevention.

The results of this research question the effectiveness of intervention models that focus on a single component in preventing suicide. Instead, it highlights the need to take into account several environmental, socio-economic, and cultural aspects when developing suicide prevention programs.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Clinical Research Development Unit of Al-Zahra Hospital at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for providing epidemiological and statistical supports. We also thank the “National Deputy for Research and Technology of the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education”, Deputy for Health and Research at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and the Health Center of Bonab County.

Abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted odds ratio

CI

Confidence interval (CI)

SLE

Stressful life event

SA

Suicide attempt

SPP

Suicide prevention program

LMICs

Low- and middle-income countries

Author contributions

HA developed the first draft of the manuscript and data analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to the protocol development. ASK, AM, VA, MH, PK and FK developed the protocol, interpreted and analyzed data, collected data, provided technical comments and interpretations. All authors contributed to the manuscript development and/or made substantive suggestions for revision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was financially supported, reviewed and supervised by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and the national “Deputy for Research and Technology of the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education”.

Data availability

Suicide data are not publicly available based on the institute policy. However, the data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The present study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences to number: IR.TBZMED.REC.1403.121. The data and informations for this study were obtained from registry for suicide and suicidal behavior system at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. No human subjects or interviews were used for data collection. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Fakhari, A., Farahbakhsh, M., Esmaeili, E. D. & Azizi, H. A longitudinal study of suicide and suicide attempt in Northwest of Iran: incidence, predictors, and socioeconomic status and the role of Sociocultural status. BMC Public. Health. 21(1), 1486 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Esmaeili, E. D., Farahbakhsh, M., Sarbazi, E., Khodamoradi, F. & Azizi, H. Predictors and incidence rate of suicide re-attempt among suicide attempters: a prospective study. Asian J. Psychiatry69, 102999 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azizi, H., Esmaeili, E. D., Khodamoradi, F. & Sarbazi, E. Effective suicide prevention strategies in primary healthcare settings: a systematic review. Middle East. Curr. Psychiatry29(1), 101 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Azizi, H., Fakhari, A., Farahbakhsh, M., Esmaeili, E. D. & Mirzapour, M. Outcomes of community-based suicide prevention program in primary health care of Iran. Int. J. Mental Health Syst.15, 1–11 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farahbakhsh, M. et al. Developing a community-based suicide prevention program in primary health care. Commun. Ment. Health J.58(4), 713–719 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Naghavi, M. Global, regional, and national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. bmj 364. (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Yu, J. et al. Risk of suicide, suicide attempt, and suicidal ideation among people with vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 25(1), 177 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asadiyun, M. & Daliri, S. Suicide attempt and suicide death in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Iran. J. Psychiatry. 18(2), 191 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Daliri, S., Bazyar, J., Sayehmiri, K., Delpisheh, A. & Sayehmiri, F. The incidence rates of suicide attempts and successful suicides in seven Climatic conditions in Iran from 2001 to 2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. J. Kurdistan Univ. Med. Sci.21(6), 1–15 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farahbakhsh, M. et al. Socio-demographic status and 12 years trend of completed suicide in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran, during the period 2007–2018. Middle East. Curr. Psychiatry. 28, 1–6 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zeinalzadeh, A. H., Saiyarsarai, S., Jafari-Khounigh, A. & Soares, J. J. Incidence of suicide in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Social Determinants Health. 2(2), 61–69 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shooshtari, M. H. et al. Factors associated with suicidal attempts in Iran: a systematic review. Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci.10(1), e948 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lester, D. Suicide and Islam. Archives Suicide Res.10(1), 77–97 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lew, B. et al. An analysis of age-standardized suicide rates in Muslim-majority countries in 2000–2019. BMC Public. Health. 22(1), 882 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arafat, S. Y., Rezaeian, M. & Khan, M. M. Suicidal behavior in Islamic countries: an overview. Suicidal Behav. Muslim Majority Countries: Epidemiol. Risk Factors Prev.2024, 1–18 (2024).
  • 16.Arafat, S. Y., Marthoenis, M., Khan, M. M. & Rezaeian, M. Association between suicide rate and human development index, income, and the political system in 46 Muslim-majority countries: an ecological study. Eur. J. Invest. Health Psychol. Educ.12(7), 754–764 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arafat, S. Y. et al. Prevalence of suicidal behaviour among students living in Muslim-majority countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open.9(3), e67 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holmes, T. H. & Rahe, R. H. The social readjustment rating scale. J. Psychosom. Res. (1967). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Roohafza, H. et al. Development and validation of the stressful life event questionnaire. Int. J. Public. Health. 56, 441–448 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Farahbakhsh, M. et al. The role and comparison of stressful life events in suicide and suicide attempt: a descriptive-analytical study. Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci.14, 2(2020).
  • 21.Azizi, H. & Davtalab-Esmaeili, E. Iranian first-line health care providers practice in COVID-19 outbreak. Iran. J. Public. Health. 49(Supple 1), 119–121 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kahlert, J., Gribsholt, S. B., Gammelager, H., Dekkers, O. M. & Luta, G. Control of confounding in the analysis phase–an overview for clinicians. Clin. Epidemiol.2017, 195–204 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Fakhari, A. et al. Early marriage, stressful life events and risk of suicide and suicide attempt: a case–control study in Iran. BMC Psychiatry. 22(1), 71 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hajebi, A., Ahmadzad-Asl, M., Davoudi, F. & Ghayyomi, R. Trend of suicide in Iran during 2009 to 2012: epidemiological evidences from National suicide registration. Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci.10, 4 (2016).
  • 25.Mahdavi, S. A., Rezaeian, S. & Rostami, M. Profile of fatal suicide in Iran: a report from the Iranian forensic medicine between 2016 and 2018. Acta Med. Iranica2020, 508–512 (2020).
  • 26.Rouzrokh, P., Feijani, F. A., Moshiri, Y., Ghahramani, S. & Lankarani, K. B. The pooled prevalence of attributed factors of suicide in Iran: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Arch. Iran. Med.28(1), 44–60 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ramazani, Y. et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of self-harm incidence rates by gender in Iran among individuals aged 10–39 years, 1990–2019. Sci. Rep.15(1), 2049 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee, S. et al. Differences by age and sex in adolescent suicide. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health43(3), 248–253 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barrigon, M. L. & Cegla-Schvartzman, F. Sex, gender, and suicidal behavior. Behav. Neurobiol. Suicide Self Harm2020, 89–115 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Nazarzadeh, M. et al. Determination of the social related factors of suicide in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public. Health. 13, 1–9 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alami, A., Nejatian, M., Elaheh, L-M. & Jafari, A. Epidemiology of suicide/suicide attempt and its association with individual, family, and social factors in Eastern part of Iran: a historical cohort study. Iran. J. Public. Health. 48(8), 1469 (2019). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Azizi, H. et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for early marriage and the correlations with depressive symptoms in Northwest of Iran. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.2025, 1–8 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Supritha, Mruthyunjaya, N., Maktar, A., Shashidhara, H. & Sandeep, M. Stressful life events in impulsive and Non-impulsive suicide attempters: a Cross-sectional study. Indian J. Psychol. Med.2024, 02537176241240096 (2024).
  • 34.Rimkeviciene, J. & De Leo, D. Impulsive suicide attempts: a systematic literature review of definitions, characteristics and risk factors. J. Affect. Disord.171, 93–104 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arafat, S. Y., Khan, M. A. S., Knipe, D. & Khan, M. M. Population attributable fractions of clinical and social risk factors for suicide in Bangladesh: finding from a case–control psychological autopsy study. Brain Behav.11(12), e2409 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Park, S. et al. The association of suicide risk with negative life events and social support according to gender in Asian patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res.228(3), 277–282 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Arafat, S. Y., Menon, V., Varadharajan, N. & Kar, S. K. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide in South East Asia. Indian J. Psychol. Med.44(1), 4–9 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pouradeli, S., Ahmadinia, H., Bahramnejad, A. & Rezaeian, M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide attempts in Kerman Province: an interrupted time series analysis. Iran. J. Public. Health. 54(1), 195 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Movahed, E. et al. Comparison of the trend of suicide before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Iran from 2016 to 2023. BMC Public. Health. 25(1), 66 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Solano, P., Pizzorno, E., Pompili, M., Serafini, G. & Amore, M. Conceptualizations of suicide through time and socio-economic factors: a historical mini-review. Ir. J. Psychol. Med.35(1), 75–86 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Breuer, C. Unemployment and suicide mortality: evidence from regional panel data in Europe. Health Econ.24(8), 936–950 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Andres, A. R. Income inequality, unemployment, and suicide: a panel data analysis of 15 European countries. Appl. Econ.37(4), 439–451 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fountoulakis, K. N., Koupidis, S. A., Siamouli, M., Grammatikopoulos, I. A. & Theodorakis, P. N. Suicide, recession, and unemployment. Lancet381(9868), 721–722 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Solano, P. et al. Employment status, inflation and suicidal behaviour: an analysis of a stratified sample in Italy. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry. 58(5), 477–484 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brockie, T. et al. Planning for implementation and sustainability of a community-based suicide surveillance system in a native American community. Implement. Sci. Commun.4(1), 1 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rahmani, A. et al. Key messages for suicide prevention media campaigns in Iran: findings from a Delphi study. BMC Public. Health25, 697 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fakhari, A. et al. Developing inpatient suicide prevention strategies in medical settings: integrating literature review with expert testimony. Asian J. Psychiatry. 78, 103266 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Suicide data are not publicly available based on the institute policy. However, the data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES