Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Apr 10:rs.3.rs-5834681. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5834681/v1

Table 5.

Concordance of the alternative measures of response to MDR-TB treatment compared to MGIT among HIV-Positive participants

Method CFM concordance
n/N (%)
FDA
concordance
n/N (%)
TBMBLA
concordance
n/N (%)
MB7H11S
concordance
n/N (%)
Weeks Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg
W2 14/19
(73.7)
4/5
(100)
10/19
(52.6)
5/5
(100)
8/17
(47.1)
4/5
(80.0)
7/19
(36.8)
5/5
(100)
W4 8/14
(38.1)
7/7
(100)
4/14
(28.6)
7/7
(100)
8/13
(61.5)
3/4
(75.0)
4/11
(36.4)
7/7
(100)
W6 4/9
(44.4)
9/9
(100)
2/9
(22.2)
9/9
(100)
3/7
(42.9)
6/9
(66.7)
1/9
(11.1)
9/9
(100)
W8 2/4
(50.0)
12/13
(92.3)
2/4
(50.0)
12/13
(92.3)
0/2
(0.0)
7/11
(63.6)
1/4
(25.0)
11/11
(100)
W12 -----* 15/15
(100)
-----* 14/14
(100)
----* 11/11
(100)
1/1
(100)
11/11
(100)
W16 -----* 17/17
(100)
----* 14/14
(100)
---* 13/13
(100)
-----* 15/15
(100)

------*: All negative by the test and no false positive, CFM=Concentrated Fluorescent Microscopy, FDA=, TB MBLA– Tuberculosis Molecular Bacterial Load Assay, MGIT= Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube, MB7H11S= Middle Brook 7H11 Selective, W=Weeks, Pos = positive, Neg=Negative