Table 5.

Linear mixed model summary statistics and separate comparisons show effects of positive information and negative information each in interaction with attractiveness on the LPP

LPP
Coefficient	b	SE	t	P
Intercept (grand mean)	5.96	0.58	10.26	<.001
High vs. low attractiveness	0.06	0.18	0.32	.75
Negative vs. neutral information	2.04	0.21	9.91	<.001
Positive vs. neutral information	1.74	0.16	10.74	<.001
Negative vs. neutral info × high vs. low att	−0.60	0.26	−2.31	.027
Positive vs. neutral info × high vs. low att	0.16	0.23	0.69	.49
Separate comparisons	b	SE	t	P
High attractiveness: negative vs. Neutral info	1.74	0.24	7.15	<.001
High attractiveness: positive vs. Neutral info	1.82	0.20	9.10	<.001
High attractiveness: negative vs. Positive info	−0.08	0.27	−0.29	.77
Low attractiveness: negative vs. Neutral info	2.34	0.24	9.62	<.001
Low attractiveness: positive vs. neutral info	1.66	0.20	8.30	<.001
Low attractiveness: negative vs. positive info	0.68	0.27	2.52	.030
Negative information: high vs. low att	−0.39	0.24	−1.64	.16
Positive information: high vs. low att	0.37	0.23	1.58	.15
Neutral information: high vs. low att	0.20	0.23	0.88	.43
Formula of converging model	LPP ∼ information × attractiveness + (information × attractiveness|| subject) + (1 | face)

Note. × stands for interaction. Double bars in random effects terms set correlation parameters to zero. Separate comparisons’ P-values were FDR corrected for nine tests. P-values < .05 are printed in bold.