Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 17;20(1):nsae071. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae071

Table 7.

Mixed model summary statistics and follow-up tests show effects of positive information and negative information each in interaction with attractiveness on attractiveness ratings before and after information exposure

Attractiveness rating
Coefficient b SE z P
Phase (before vs. after) 0.03 0.12 0.26 .80
Before information exposure
High vs. low attractiveness 6.18 0.57 10.76 <.001
Negative vs. neutral information −0.25 0.20 −1.29 .20
Positive vs. neutral information −0.12 0.21 −0.55 .58
Negative vs. neutral info × high vs. low att 1.28 0.41 3.14 .002
Positive vs. neutral info × high vs. low att 1.40 0.43 3.25 .001
After information exposure
High vs. low attractiveness 5.38 0.64 8.36 <.001
Negative vs. neutral information −2.15 0.33 −6.61 <.001
Positive vs. neutral information 0.78 0.31 2.48 .013
Negative vs. neutral info × high vs. low att 0.56 0.45 1.25 .21
Positive vs. neutral info × high vs. low att 0.84 0.42 2.01 .04
Formula of converging model Rating ∼ phase/ information × attractiveness + (1 + phase/ information × attractiveness| subject) + (1 | face)

Note. × stands for interaction. The / in the model formula denotes nesting. P-values < .05 are printed in bold.