Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Nov 8;242(3):593–615. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06711-9

Fig. 3. Effects of outcome revaluation training on fixed-interval responding.

Fig. 3

The event record depicts a representative 5-day period of self-administration on various doses of cocaine, when only the drug-taking lever was available. Tick marks indicate infusions, session means (± SEM) shown below. Mean fixed-interval response records for trials immediately before (Left) or after training (Right) for each group are shown as a solid trace, along with pre-revaluation test values (dotted trace). The shaded region that joins accompanies each FI trace represents the ± SEM of each group’s pre-testing baseline. Post-training response records are overlaid for between-group comparison (Bottom Right). Inset figure depicts total FI response during the post-test as percent pre-test.