Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):105065. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i4.105065

Table 4.

Association between abnormal liver imaging and steatosis staging in hepatitis C

Variables
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
LR (+)
LR (-)
Abnormal liver finding
≥ S3 56.10 60.40 24.30 85.90 1.42 0.73
≥ S2 53.30 61.40 34.20 77.70 1.38 0.76
≥ S1 51.50 61.30 38.10 73.20 1.33 0.79
Cirrhosis
≥ S3 3.50 94.60 12.90 81.20 0.65 1.02
≥ S2 3.60 94.40 19.40 72.20 0.64 1.02
≥ S1 3.90 94.20 23.50 67.90 0.67 1.02
Hepatic steatosis
≥ S3 24.60 93.00 44.40 84.50 3.53 0.81
≥ S2 20.10 93.50 54.00 75.60 3.11 0.85
≥ S1 18.00 93.90 57.80 71.20 2.95 0.87
Suggestive of chronic liver disease
≥ S3 28.10 73.40 19.30 81.80 1.05 0.98
≥ S2 26.00 72.80 26.50 72.30 0.96 1.02
≥ S1 26.20 72.60 30.70 68.00 0.96 1.02
Increased echogenicity
≥ S3 24.60 91.30 38.90 84.20 2.81 0.83
≥ S2 23.10 92.60 54.20 76.10 3.13 0.83
≥ S1 20.90 92.80 57.30 71.70 2.9 0.85

PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; LR: Likelihood ratio.