Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2025 Mar 30;17(3):e81447. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81447

Gut Microbiota and Mental Health: A Comprehensive Review of Gut-Brain Interactions in Mood Disorders

Ishani Mehta 1, Keshav Juneja 2, Tharun Nimmakayala 3, Lajpat Bansal 1, Shivani Pulekar 4, Dileep Duggineni 5, Hana Khan Ghori 6, Nishi Modi 7, Salma Younas 8,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC12038870  PMID: 40303511

Abstract

The human gut flora of trillions of bacteria is vital for general health and greatly influences digestion, immune system function, and brain development. Through neuronal, hormonal, and immunological channels, the gut-brain axis (GBA), a bidirectional communication network, links the gut microbiota to the central nervous system (CNS). This relationship has been linked to affective diseases, including depression and anxiety, as well as mental health issues.

This review explores the intricate relationship between gut bacteria and mood disorders, focusing on how gut microbiota-host interactions, immune system modulation, and neurotransmitter control support mental health. The function of important microbial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), in preserving blood-brain barrier integrity and modulating neuroinflammation is covered in this review. It also examines the bidirectional impact between gut health and mental health, including how dysbiosis could aggravate mood disorders and how depressed states might change the composition of gut bacteria. Furthermore, we discuss how psychotropic drugs affect gut flora and consider other elements such as nutrition and lifestyle that affect gut microbiome composition. Potential paths for treating mood disorders through gut microbiota modification are presented as emerging treatment techniques, including probiotics, nutritional therapies, and precision medicine.

The development of new therapeutic approaches for mood disorders depends on the awareness of the GBA. Gut bacteria significantly affect mental health through immune modulation, neurotransmitter generation, and other intricate processes. Future studies should concentrate on large, varied populations to better understand these interactions and to create customized treatments that combine gut microbiota modulation with conventional mental health therapies.

Keywords: anxiety, blood-brain barrier, depression, dysbiosis, gut-brain axis, mental health, microbiota, mood disorders, neurotransmitters, short-chain fatty acids

Introduction and background

The human gut microbiota, composed of trillions of microorganisms, is crucial for overall health, impacting digestion, immune function, and brain health [1]. Recent research has highlighted the gut-brain axis (GBA), a communication network between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system (CNS) through neural, hormonal, and immune pathways, suggesting that the gut microbiota can significantly impact brain function and mental health [2].

Mood disorders such as depression and anxiety are prevalent globally and impose substantial societal and economic burdens [3]. Emerging evidence indicates that the gut microbiota may play a crucial role in mood disorders by affecting neurotransmitter systems (chemical messengers in the brain, such as serotonin and dopamine), immune responses, and stress mechanisms (such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis) [4]. The GBA theory proposes that the gut microbiota influences brain function through mechanisms such as the vagus nerve (a major nerve connecting the brain and gut, facilitating direct communication), neurotransmitter production, and immune response regulation [5].

Studies have shown that microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (small molecules produced when gut bacteria ferment dietary fiber) affect brain function by altering inflammation and neurotransmitter production [6].

Both clinical and preclinical studies have shown a bidirectional relationship between gut health and mental health, indicating that changes in the gut microbiota can affect mood and behavior, and vice versa. Recent research has advanced our understanding of this link using animal models (laboratory experiments using rodents to study gut-brain interactions) and human clinical trials (research studies involving human participants to test interventions) [7]. Limitations such as small sample sizes, short study durations, and diverse study designs persist and necessitate further research. Our understanding remains incomplete, especially regarding diverse study populations and gut-brain interaction mechanisms [8].

Given these findings, modulating gut microbiota through probiotics, prebiotics, diet, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy for mental health conditions. Several clinical studies suggest that interventions targeting gut microbiota may alleviate symptoms of depression and anxiety, highlighting the potential for microbiome-based treatments in psychiatric care. However, challenges such as individual variability in microbiome composition, limited large-scale trials, and regulatory concerns must be addressed before these interventions can be widely implemented in clinical practice.

This review aims to synthesize current evidence linking gut microbiota to mood disorders, identify gaps in the literature, and suggest future research directions. It explores microbiota-host interactions, diet, microbial metabolites, and psychotropic medication effects (the influence of antidepressants and antipsychotics on gut microbiota) to provide a detailed view of the gut-brain relationship.

Review

Microbiota-host interaction and brain

The GBA is a bidirectional network that connects the CNS with the enteric nervous system (ENS) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. ENS is a network of neurons in the GI tract that controls digestive processes independently of the CNS. It involves neural, hormonal, and immunological pathways. The GBA plays a crucial role in physiological processes like digestion, metabolism, mood, and cognition. Dysfunction in this axis is linked to conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), depression, anxiety, and neurodegenerative disease, highlighting its potential for novel treatments. Understanding gut-brain connections offers the potential for novel treatments for related disorders.

Pathways of Interaction

Immune system: The immune system crucially links the gut and the brain, coordinating complex interactions. Gut bacteria activate the innate immune system via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs: immune system proteins that detect microbial components, triggering immune responses), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs: a type of PRR that identifies pathogens and activates immune signaling pathways), on intestinal cells [9]. This triggers the release of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6. These cytokines can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and affect brain function by altering neurotransmitter metabolism, including gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin, and dopamine, which are essential for mood and cognitive functions [10,11]. Immune activation and disruption of neurotransmitter levels can exacerbate neuropsychiatric disorders like depression and anxiety. Inflammation can also compromise the intestinal barrier, increase gut permeability, and intensify inflammation and immune response [12]. The vagus nerve facilitates bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain. Gut immune activity activates vagal afferents that signal the brain, whereas brain signals regulate gut immune responses via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway [13]. This interaction influences the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and HPA axis (a hormonal system regulating stress responses, involving the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal glands), modulating stress responses and creating a feedback loop between stress and immunity [14]. Imbalances in immune signaling within the GBA are linked to diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's through neuroinflammation and neuronal damage [15]. Dysbiosis, an imbalance in gut microbiota composition, can affect immune function, digestion, and mental health. Understanding these immunological interactions is critical for designing medicines that restore GBA balance and treat associated diseases.

Vagus nerve: The vagus nerve, or tenth cranial nerve (CN X), is the longest cranial nerve, extending from the brainstem to the heart, lungs, and GI tract. The vagus nerve is an intricate network of motor and sensory fibers that controls various physiological processes. It plays a crucial role in the GBA by transmitting sensory information from the gut to the brainstem. Receptors in the GI tract detect changes and send these data to the brainstem via vagal afferent fibers [16]. This information is processed in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) and then relayed to higher brain regions, allowing for the perception of gut sensations and appropriate responses [17]. The nerve also controls motor functions in the digestive system, including GI motility, secretion, and absorption, through its influence on smooth muscles, glands, and enteric neurons [18]. The vagus nerve regulates the ENS and neuroimmune functions, maintains immune balance, and limits inflammation through acetylcholine [19]. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has the potential to treat these conditions by restoring the vagal tone and modulating neuroimmune interactions. Figure 1 visually represents the complex interactions between the gut microbiota and the brain, specifically highlighting the GBA.

Figure 1. Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis: Bidirectional Communication Pathways.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the microbiome-gut-brain axis. The diagram shows the bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain through neural, hormonal, and immune pathways, emphasizing the role of gut microbiota in modulating brain function and mental health.

HDACs: histone deacetylases; 5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine; SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids; CRH: corticotropin-releasing hormone; ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone

Credit: Image created by the author

Microglia and BBB: Microglia are specialized immune cells in the CNS that protect against infections and remove damaged neurons and debris. Research indicates that microbial metabolites from the gut can influence microglial activation via pathways involving cytokines, neurotransmitters, and neurotrophic factors [20]. The interaction between microglia and gut bacteria is key for regulating neuroinflammation, synaptic plasticity (the ability of neurons (nerve cells) to strengthen or weaken their connections over time, which is essential for learning and memory), and neuronal balance, thus affecting behavior and brain function. The BBB acts as a selective barrier between the bloodstream and the CNS but can also facilitate the transfer of gut-derived signals, including immune mediators and microbial metabolites, into the brain, indicating its role in gut-brain communication [21]. Gut-derived signals can increase BBB permeability through inflammatory mediators, allowing proinflammatory substances to enter the brain, which may lead to neuroinflammation and neurological conditions. Conversely, beneficial gut metabolites, such as SCFAs, protect the BBB and reduce neuroinflammation [20,22], whereas gut chemicals also influence BBB permeability and immune cell activity. Gut-derived chemicals can affect BBB permeability and neuroinflammation by altering peripheral immune cell activity, including that of T cells and monocytes [23].

Role of Neurotransmitters

Gut microbiota plays a vital role in modulating various neurotransmitters, thereby optimizing mood and cognitive function through several complex mechanisms. The synthesis of neurotransmitters or their precursors, which can cross the BBB and contribute to neurotransmitter production in the brain, is facilitated by enzymes released by gut bacteria [24]. Gut microorganisms produce metabolites that signal intestinal enteroendocrine cells to produce and release neurotransmitters. These neurotransmitters can act locally in the ENS or transmit signals to the brain via the vagus nerve [25]. Gut bacteria affect neurotransmitter levels by modulating the immune system and producing anti-inflammatory metabolites like SCFAs, which can indirectly influence brain health [26].

Gut microbiota affects neurotransmitter balance and influences mental health and cognition. Gut bacteria interact with the CNS through neurotransmitters like GABA, dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and histamine. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter found in both the central and peripheral nervous systems, with over 90% of the gut regulating peristalsis, pain, nausea, and secretion. It is produced by enterochromaffin cells using the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TpH1), which converts tryptophan to serotonin [27]. Gut microbiota regulates TpH1 in enterochromaffin cells, boosting serotonin levels in the gut [28]. While peripheral serotonin cannot cross the BBB, the gut microbiota influences central serotonin by altering tryptophan metabolism, affecting its levels in the blood and its conversion to serotonin in the CNS [29].

Dopamine, a crucial neurotransmitter that plays crucial roles in mood, motivation, and motor control, is produced in brain regions such as the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental areas. Dysregulation of dopamine levels is linked to neurological and psychiatric disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and addiction [30-32]. In the gut, bacterial strains like Staphylococcus can produce dopamine from levodopa (L-DOPA) with the help of staphylococcal aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (SadA), affecting gastric secretion, blood flow, and motility [25].

GABA, the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS, helps to balance neuronal excitation and inhibition, regulates muscle tone, has a calming effect on the brain, and controls anxiety, stress, and fear. GABA is synthesized from glutamate by the enzyme glutamate decarboxylase, which is linked to several neurological and psychiatric disorders such as epilepsy, anxiety disorders, and depression [33,34]. Evidence has shown that GABA is produced by various microorganisms, and germ-free animals show reduced peripheral GABA levels, highlighting the role of the gut microbiota [35]. Although GABA from gut microbes typically does not directly cross the BBB, microbiota-derived metabolites, such as acetate, can traverse the barrier and may influence GABA metabolism in the CNS, with mechanisms still being explored [24].

Norepinephrine, a neurotransmitter and hormone crucial for regulating arousal, alertness, and the fight-or-flight response, is synthesized in the locus coeruleus and adrenal medulla. It also affects cardiovascular functions, such as heart rate and blood pressure, and cognitive processes, such as attention and memory consolidation. Dysregulation is linked to various conditions, including anxiety, Parkinson's disease, and hypertension [36]. In vivo studies have shown that certain bacteria can produce norepinephrine, with reduced levels in germ-free mice and rising levels after microbiota colonization, although whether this is due to direct bacterial production or indirect effects remains unclear [37,38]. The microbiota significantly affects the catecholamine systems. For instance, antibiotic-treated mice showed heightened cocaine sensitivity, which was normalized by SCFAs from microbial fermentation, suggesting an indirect impact on norepinephrine [39].

Impacts of microbial metabolites

Gut microbiota produce key neurotransmitters involved in mood regulation. Lactobacilli secrete acetylcholine and GABA, whereas Candida, Streptococcus, Escherichia, and Enterococcus secrete serotonin. Bacillus and Serratia secrete dopamine [40]. These neurotransmitters play essential roles in emotion and mood regulation [41].

SCFAs, including acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are produced by gut microbiota via carbohydrate fermentation [42]. SCFAs cross the BBB through monocarboxylate transporters (MCT) and influence the immune system and gene expression via free fatty acid receptors and histone crotonylation [42,43]. Low SCFA levels are associated with major depressive disorders, and SCFA supplementation reduces depressive behaviors in mice, although human studies are less conclusive [44,45].

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is critical in the GBA. In mice administered antibiotics, gut dysbiosis leads to altered BDNF levels in the hippocampus and amygdala, correlating with behavioral changes [46].

Tryptophan, GABA, and dopamine are vital for mood modulation. Tryptophan is a serotonin precursor, and its metabolites, such as kynurenine, affect pro-inflammatory cytokines and are linked to mood disorders like postpartum depression [47]. GABA, produced by Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Escherichia, acts as both an excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter, and its modulation influences depressive behavior [48]. Dopamine, produced by gut microbes such as Lactobacillus and Bacillus, is essential for reward-related behaviors; however, the role of gut-derived DA in mood regulation requires further exploration [49]. Nitric oxide (NO), produced by gut microbiota through anaerobic respiration, is associated with suicidality, and bacterial metabolites such as indole downregulate NO production and reduce neuroinflammation [50,51].

Hydrogen sulfide, produced by gut microbes via cysteine degradation, affects synaptic plasticity, a key element in mood disorders [52]. Decreased hydrogen sulfide levels are linked to depression severity, making it a potential therapeutic target [53]. Carbon monoxide (CO), produced by the microbiota through heme oxygenase 1 (HO1), has antidepressant effects in animal studies by increasing dopamine and affecting heme oxygenase activity in the hippocampus [54].

The gut microbiota synthesizes various polyamines such as spermine, spermidine, and putrescine in the presence of amino acid precursors [55]. In humans, putrescine is produced in the cytoplasm of cells by decarboxylation of ornithine catalyzed by the enzymes ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), spermine, and spermidine, which are synthesized by S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase [56]. The brain exhibits a cellular stress response referred to as the polyamine-stress response (PSR) when exposed to stressful stimuli, with an initial, brief elevation in polyamine metabolism [56]. The magnitude of the response was found to correlate with the intensity of the stress; however, in the presence of chronic stress, a partial response was observed, leading to the accumulation of putrescine and reduced levels of higher polyamines such as spermidine and spermine [56,57]. Long-term inhibition of polyamine synthesis due to chronic stress has been found to deplete brain polyamines and alter emotional reactivity to stressors [58]. Decreased levels of polyamines are found in the hippocampus and accumbens septi in a rat model, and low plasma levels of agmatine are observed in depression, which is normalized to treatment [58]. S-adenosyl methionine, vital for the production of polyamines, has been used to treat depression in humans [59].

Figure 2 highlights the specific interactions between gut microbiota, neurotransmitters, and mood regulation.

Figure 2. Gut Microbiota, Neurotransmitters, and Mood Regulation.

Figure 2

The interplay between gut microbiota, neurotransmitters, and mood. This figure illustrates how gut-derived neurotransmitters and metabolites influence mood regulation through the gut-brain axis.

ENS: enteric nervous system; vagus: vagus nerve; SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids; 5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine; DA: dopamine; GABA: gamma-aminobutyric acid; 2-AG: 2-arachidonoylglycerol

Credit: Image created by the author

Depression and gut microbiome

The relationship between the gut microbiota and depression is bidirectional and complex and involves multiple physiological pathways. Emerging research highlights how changes in gut microbiota composition can influence depressive symptoms and vice versa.

Gut microbiota can affect brain function and mood regulation through various mechanisms. Several studies have shown that an imbalance in gut microbiota, known as dysbiosis, is associated with depressive disorders [60]. Dysbiosis can lead to increased intestinal permeability, commonly referred to as "leaky gut," allowing bacterial endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to enter the bloodstream. Leaky gut is a condition in which the intestinal lining becomes too porous, allowing harmful substances to enter the bloodstream [61]. This triggers systemic inflammation, a well-known factor in the development of depression. Elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)), have been consistently observed in individuals with depression [62]. Moreover, SCFAs produced by gut microbiota, such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate, play a role in maintaining the integrity of the BBB, reducing neuroinflammation, and influencing the production of neurotrophic factors like BDNF, which supports neuronal growth and function [63].

In contrast, depressive states can also lead to changes in gut microbiota composition. Psychological stress and depression can modify eating habits, reduce gut motility, and alter the secretion of digestive enzymes and mucus, all of which affect the gut microbial ecology [64]. Chronic stress, which is common in depressive disorders, activates the HPA axis and increases cortisol levels. Cortisol can alter gut permeability and affect gut microbiota composition, reducing beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria while promoting the growth of harmful bacteria [65]. Additionally, depressive behaviors, such as changes in diet and reduced physical activity, can lead to an altered gut microbiota profile. For instance, diets high in fat and sugar, often associated with depression, can promote dysbiosis and further worsen depressive symptoms [66].

Mechanisms

The mechanisms underlying the gut microbiota-depression relationship primarily involve neuroimmune dysfunction and HPA axis dysregulation. Dysbiosis-induced inflammation is a key player in the neuroimmune pathway. Gut-derived inflammatory mediators can cross the BBB and activate microglia and resident immune cells of the brain. This activation leads to neuroinflammation, which disrupts neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity and contributes to the development of depression [67]. The HPA axis, a central stress response system, is often dysregulated in patients with depression. The gut microbiota can modulate the HPA axis through the production of microbial metabolites that influence cortisol levels. Dysbiosis can lead to an exaggerated HPA axis response to stress, resulting in elevated cortisol levels, which further perpetuate gut permeability and inflammation, thereby creating a vicious cycle [68]. Figure 3 illustrates how gut dysbiosis can lead to depression via various physiological pathways.

Figure 3. Dysbiosis, Intestinal Permeability, and Depression: Pathway Overview.

Figure 3

Pathway illustrating the relationship between dysbiosis, intestinal permeability, and depression. The figure shows how gut microbiota imbalance can lead to systemic inflammation, neuroimmune dysfunction, and ultimately depressive symptoms.

Credit: Image created by the author

Bipolar disorder (BD) and gut microbiome

BD is a severe, chronic, and recurring mood disorder classified as bipolar I and bipolar II. While bipolar I entails at least one manic episode, bipolar II is characterized by both hypomania and depressive symptoms [69]. The mechanisms by which the gut microbiota affects the pathogenesis of BD are multifold, with one of them being through immune dysregulation [70].

The association between BD, gut microbiota, and immune response can be presumed by acknowledging the correlation between BD and gut inflammatory diseases like IBD. For instance, the diagnostic panel for Crohn's disease includes detecting antibodies against Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a normal gut microbiota organism. Notably, patients also often exhibit elevated levels of antibodies against S. cerevisiae, particularly near the onset of the disease. It is likely that the presence of these antibodies indicates a response to the yeast’s presence at the mucous-blood interface, which is disrupted during inflammation [71,72].

In this context, it is important to consider the potential role of antibiotic therapy in triggering acute manic episodes in patients with BD [73]. A study of patients hospitalized for acute mania found a significant link between recent antibiotic use and more severe manic symptoms [74]. It should be noted that a hypothesis suggests that antibiotics can alter gut bacteria, which may affect proteins that regulate the BBB, as well as cytokines, BDNF, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporters. These changes could lead to cognitive impairment over time [75].

Some studies have identified an association between the bacteria Flavonifractor, which degrade the antioxidant quercetin, and BD [76,77], particularly in female smokers. These bacteria may elevate oxidative stress and inflammation by disrupting quercetin production. This finding aligns with earlier studies that reported increased oxidative stress and low-grade inflammation in BD patients [78,79].

Immune dysfunction in BD may be influenced by a complex interplay between stress, gut microbiota, genetics, and epigenetics [80]. Intriguingly, gut microbiome diversity and consistency were negatively correlated with the methylation status of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like gene (ARNTL gene), which is known to regulate monoamine oxidase transcription. Recent studies have proposed that changes in the overall gut microbiome diversity could act as an internal environmental factor, influencing the epigenetics of the ARNTL clock gene, which is implicated in BD development [81].

The pathogenic role of gut microbiota in neuroinflammation is seen in BD. A recent study, consisting of medication-free BD patients with depression episodes using a mouse model with FMT transplantation, provided a plausible association between gut microbiota and neuroinflammation [82].

Gut microbial dysbiosis has been linked to compromised BBB integrity and increased permeability [83,84], which are implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders [85]. A compromised BBB may facilitate the entry of gut microbe-derived components such as LPS into the CNS, triggering neuroinflammation. This LPS stimulation can induce microglial transformation into the M1 phenotype and provoke the release of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α), thereby upregulating TRANK1 expression in neurons [86]. TRANK1 overexpression leads to reduced dendritic spine density in cortical neurons.

This loss of dendritic spine density in the prefrontal cortex has been implicated in the cognitive deficits and behavioral abnormalities seen in BD [84,87-89]. Research also indicates that individuals with BD exhibit a developmental defect in synaptic pruning, resulting in abnormalities in the modulation of neuronal connectivity within the ventral prefrontal and limbic cortices. Synaptic pruning is a natural process where the brain removes excess synaptic connections during development; abnormalities in pruning are linked to psychiatric disorders [90,91].

KAT-2 is an essential enzyme that synthesizes kynurenic acid (KYNA) from kynurenine (KYN), a process central to the tryptophan metabolic pathway [92]. Tryptophan catabolism can be triggered by inflammatory stimuli such as viral infections, bacterial LPS, and interferon stimulation [93]. In patients with BD, elevated CSF KYNA levels have been reported in previous studies and linked to manic episodes and psychotic symptoms [94,95]. These findings suggest that dysregulation of the KYN-KYNA metabolic pathway may be involved in BD pathophysiology [84].

The Interaction Between GI Hormones, Gut Bacteria, and Cognitive Impairment in BD

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) signaling plays a neuroprotective role by influencing synaptic plasticity and neuroinflammation and enhancing cognitive functions such as learning, memory, executive function, and attention [96,97]. GLP-1 receptors are found in key brain regions such as the cerebral cortex, hypothalamus, and limbic system, which play important roles in regulating emotions and cognition [98]. Thus, diminished GLP-1R signaling due to decreased levels of butyrate-producing bacteria in BD patients might compromise synaptic plasticity and cognitive function, as evidenced by multiple studies [99].

Another GI hormone, peptide YY (PYY), is a satiety hormone produced by L-cells in the intestines, influencing the CNS by suppressing appetite-stimulating neurons that produce neuropeptide Y [100]. While direct evidence linking PYY to BD is scarce, lower peripheral PYY levels could potentially contribute to reduced GABA inhibition. This is noteworthy as both neuropeptide Y and GABA are released by neurons in the arcuate nucleus. These reduced GABA levels could be potentially linked to cognitive impairment in BD [101,102].

Effects of psychotropic medications on gut microbiota

Psychotropic medications, typically used for managing mental disorders, interact bidirectionally with the gut microbiota, meaning that they can both affect and be affected by these microorganisms [103-109]. Commonly used psychotropic drugs for mood disorders include antipsychotics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and lithium.

Antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which are widely used to manage depressive symptoms in mood disorders, have notable antibacterial properties [106]. For instance, sertraline demonstrates antimicrobial activity against both gram-positive (Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species) and gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae) bacteria, whereas fluoxetine increases the risk of Clostridium difficile infection [107-109]. In addition, atypical antipsychotics, such as quetiapine and olanzapine, tend to reduce gut microbial diversity, notably affecting Lachnospiraceae, Akkermansia, and Sutterella taxa in rat models [110,111].

In contrast, lithium, a gold-standard treatment for bipolar mood disorder, enhances microbial diversity, particularly by increasing Peptostreptococcaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Ruminococcaceae families in animal studies [104,105]. In addition to lithium, anticonvulsants such as valproic acid also increase the abundance of Clostridium and related species, whereas lamotrigine shows antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus and Staphylococcus aureus), with limited effects on gram-negative strains [106,112].

Factors influencing gut microbiota

Exploring the factors that shape gut microbiota is crucial for understanding their impact on health, particularly in relation to mood disorders. Various biological, lifestyle, dietary, and environmental factors affect the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome, shedding light on its significance for human well-being.

Biological Factors

Starting with birth, the mode of delivery significantly affects an infant’s microbiome composition. For instance, vaginally delivered infants generally acquire microbiota resembling the vaginal microbiome, dominated by Lactobacillus and Prevotella, while cesarean-delivered infants acquire microbiota resembling the skin, with species such as Streptococcus and Corynebacterium [113]. Notably, vaginal delivery also promotes beneficial species such as Bifidobacterium, which are considered crucial for immune development [114]. In addition, as people age, especially the elderly, microbial imbalances (dysbiosis) become more common, which has been implicated in the development of conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Research on how aging and microbiota interact, especially at disease onset, remains ongoing [115-117].

Lifestyle Factors

Lifestyle choices such as smoking, alcohol consumption, stress, sleep, and exercise heavily influence the gut microbiome. Aerobic exercise is hypothesized to have a beneficial effect on the gut microbiome, as it promotes a diverse microbiome with increased levels of beneficial Firmicutes and reduced amounts of Bacteroides compared to sedentary individuals, whereas excessive endurance exercise, such as in athletes, can cause dysbiosis [118-120]. Several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this alteration in the gut microbiota, including vagus nerve-mediated autonomic signaling, modulation of serotonin levels, and effects of neuroendocrines on the HPA axis [120].

Smoking introduces harmful compounds that can disrupt pH levels and lead to gut dysbiosis, whereas alcohol consumption can result in microbial imbalances linked to liver disease [121]. Bacteroides and Enterococci have been proposed to be present in individuals with alcoholic liver disease [121].

Furthermore, sleep patterns and circadian rhythms exhibit a bidirectional relationship with the gut microbiome; that is, disruption in one can lead to disruption in the other and vice versa. Altered sleep and circadian rhythms can alter the gut microbiota, with evidence showing that jet lag and poor sleep patterns are associated with gut changes [122].

Dietary Factors

The diet plays a key role in shaping the gut microbiome. For instance, breastfed infants harbor beneficial species such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, while formula-fed infants develop a different microbiome with predominant species such as Enterococcus and Streptococcus [123]. Consequently, breastfed infants have been shown to have a more stable gut microbiome with a robust immune response [124]. While in adults, plant-based diets like vegetarian and Mediterranean diets enhance the microbiome, increasing populations of anti-inflammatory microbes such as Faecalibacterium, which produce SCFAs. In contrast, diets high in animal products contribute to gut dysbiosis and inflammation, which may be linked to mood disorders and mental health conditions [125].

Stress

Stress exerts a negative influence on the gut microbiome through mechanisms such as the release of catecholamines and neuroendocrine hormones, altered vagal signaling, and gut hypoperfusion, which in turn produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). These changes can reduce gut motility, increase permeability, and promote inflammation and microbial translocation [126,127]. However, mild stressors such as cold exposure and moderate exercise can positively affect the microbiome, highlighting the complex relationship between stress and gut health and suggesting potential avenues for therapeutic intervention [128].

Interventions targeting gut microbiota

Diet and Probiotics

Dietary interventions and probiotics are emerging as complementary treatments for mood disorders; however, their current utility remains limited. Diets such as Mediterranean and anti-inflammatory diets are increasingly recommended for their ability to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, which are factors linked to mood disorders [129,130]. Studies have highlighted that diets rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and omega-3 fatty acids are correlated with lower incidences of depression and anxiety, whereas processed foods and refined sugars are associated with a higher risk of mood disorders [131]. These effects are likely mediated through the GBA, a bidirectional communication system between the gut microbiota and CNS, underscoring the impact of diet on mental health [132].

Probiotics, live microorganisms that confer health benefits, have shown promise in alleviating the symptoms of mood disorders by modulating gut microbiota and enhancing neurotransmitter production, such as serotonin and GABA, which are critical for mood regulation [133].

Psychobiotics

Psychobiotics, a specific class of probiotics targeting mental health, have demonstrated potential in reducing depressive symptoms, especially when used alongside traditional treatments, such as antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) [133]. Clinical trials suggest that probiotics can be particularly beneficial for individuals with GI disorders, such as IBS, which are often comorbid with depression and anxiety [134].

The future of treatment may involve personalized nutrition and tailoring of dietary recommendations based on individual microbiota profiles. Advances in microbiome sequencing could enable more targeted interventions by identifying microbial signatures linked to specific mood disorders [135]. Further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms through which probiotics and psychobiotics affect brain function, including their roles in neurotransmitter systems and inflammatory pathways [136]. The integration of dietary interventions, probiotic supplementation, and traditional therapies may offer novel strategies for managing mood disorders.

Precision Medicine Approaches

Precision medicine, an innovative strategy tailored to individual variability in genes, the environment, and lifestyle, holds significant promise for gut microbiota interventions. This approach customizes healthcare with medical decisions and treatments tailored to individual patients. In the context of the gut microbiota, precision medicine utilizes detailed microbial, genetic, and metabolic profiles to create personalized interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiome and improving health outcomes [137].

One key strategy is personalized nutrition, which is based on an individual’s unique microbiome and metabolic profiles. These tailored nutrition plans promote beneficial bacterial growth while suppressing harmful strains. For instance, diets rich in specific fibers and prebiotics can enhance health-promoting bacteria, potentially reducing the risk of metabolic and inflammatory diseases [138]. Personalized probiotics, live microorganisms that confer health benefits, are integral to precision medicine. Identifying the most beneficial bacterial strains allows for the design of probiotics that can restore microbial balance and address gut-related health issues [139]. Genomic and metabolomic analyses are other methods that may play a crucial role in precision medicine.

Although still in the early stages, precision medicine approaches for gut microbiota demonstrate significant potential for enhancing health through targeted, personalized interventions. As research advances, these methods are expected to become vital for managing gut microbiota-related health issues.

Conclusions

Gut microbiota influences mood disorders through pathways such as the GBA, immune modulation, and neurotransmitter production. Imbalances in gut bacteria have been linked to conditions like depression and bipolar disorder, while beneficial microbial byproducts, including SCFAs and neurotransmitters, contribute to brain function and emotional regulation. Although current research highlights a promising connection between gut health and mental wellness, several challenges remain.

Future studies should focus on larger, more diverse populations to establish causal links and assess the long-term efficacy of gut-targeted therapies. Individual variability in microbiome composition and response to treatment remains a major challenge, necessitating personalized approaches. Limitations in existing human studies, such as small sample sizes and short follow-up durations, hinder the translation of findings into clinical practice. Ethical and regulatory concerns regarding microbiota-based interventions, including fecal microbiota transplants and psychobiotics, also require careful consideration.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, Grammarly and Paperpal, for assisting in refining the language and ensuring the clarity of the manuscript. These tools helped improve the quality of the writing, but the final responsibility for the content and accuracy of the manuscript remains with the authors.

Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Salma Younas, Ishani Mehta, Keshav Juneja, Tharun Nimmakayala, Lajpat Bansal, Shivani Pulekar, Dileep Duggineni, Hana Khan Ghori, Nishi Modi

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Salma Younas, Ishani Mehta, Keshav Juneja, Tharun Nimmakayala, Lajpat Bansal, Shivani Pulekar, Dileep Duggineni, Hana Khan Ghori, Nishi Modi

Drafting of the manuscript:  Salma Younas, Ishani Mehta, Keshav Juneja, Tharun Nimmakayala, Lajpat Bansal, Shivani Pulekar, Dileep Duggineni, Hana Khan Ghori, Nishi Modi

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Salma Younas, Ishani Mehta, Keshav Juneja, Tharun Nimmakayala, Lajpat Bansal, Shivani Pulekar, Dileep Duggineni, Hana Khan Ghori, Nishi Modi

Supervision:  Ishani Mehta

References

  • 1.Gut microbiota in health and disease. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Finlay BB. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:859–904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:701–712. doi: 10.1038/nrn3346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, et al. PLoS Med. 2013;10:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The Gut-Brain Axis: influence of microbiota on mood and mental health. Appleton J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31043907/ Integr Med (Encinitas) 2018;17:28–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25830558/ Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28:203–209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gut-brain axis: focus on gut metabolites short-chain fatty acids. Guo C, Huo YJ, Li Y, Han Y, Zhou D. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10:1754–1763. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Transferring the blues: depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. Kelly JR, Borre Y, O' Brien C, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;82:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression - a systematic review. Simpson CA, Diaz-Arteche C, Eliby D, Schwartz OS, Simmons JG, Cowan CS. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;83:101943. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Human gut microbiota from autism spectrum disorder promote behavioral symptoms in mice. Sharon G, Cruz NJ, Kang DW, et al. Cell. 2019;177:1600–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Ransohoff RM. Science. 2016;353:777–783. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Dantzer R, O'Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leaky gut and autoimmune diseases. Fasano A. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2012;42:71–78. doi: 10.1007/s12016-011-8291-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.The vagus nerve at the interface of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Bonaz B, Bazin T, Pellissier S. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:49. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Collective unconscious: how gut microbes shape human behavior. Dinan TG, Stilling RM, Stanton C, Cryan JF. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;63:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Immunity, hypoxia, and metabolism-the ménage à trois of cancer: implications for immunotherapy. Riera-Domingo C, Audigé A, Granja S, et al. Physiol Rev. 2020;100:1–102. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Central nervous system control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion and modulation of gastrointestinal functions. Browning KN, Travagli RA. Compr Physiol. 2014;4:1339–1368. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Psychosocial factors, psychiatric illness and functional gastrointestinal disorders: a historical perspective. Van Oudenhove L, Vandenberghe J, Demyttenaere K, Tack J. Digestion. 2010;82:201–210. doi: 10.1159/000269822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Functional and chemical anatomy of the afferent vagal system. Berthoud HR, Neuhuber WL. Auton Neurosci. 2000;85:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S1566-0702(00)00215-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The inflammatory reflex. Tracey KJ. Nature. 2002;420:853–859. doi: 10.1038/nature01321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:965–977. doi: 10.1038/nn.4030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Blood-brain barrier: from physiology to disease and back. Sweeney MD, Zhao Z, Montagne A, Nelson AR, Zlokovic BV. Physiol Rev. 2019;99:21–78. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00050.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Braniste V, Al-Asmakh M, Kowal C, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:263. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Rothhammer V, Borucki DM, Tjon EC, et al. Nature. 2018;557:724–728. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0119-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Frost G, Sleeth ML, Sahuri-Arisoylu M, et al. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3611. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Regulation of neurotransmitters by the gut microbiota and effects on cognition in neurological disorders. Chen Y, Xu J, Chen Y. Nutrients. 2021;13:2099. doi: 10.3390/nu13062099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gut Bacteria and neurotransmitters. Dicks LMT. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1838. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Serotonin signalling in the gut - functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:473–486. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis. Yano JM, Yu K, Donaldson GP, et al. Cell. 2015;161:264–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tryptophan metabolism: a link between the gut microbiota and brain. Gao K, Mu CL, Farzi A, Zhu WY. Adv Nutr. 2020;11:709–723. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schizophrenia, dopamine and the striatum: from biology to symptoms. McCutcheon RA, Abi-Dargham A, Howes OD. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42:205–220. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Impaired dopamine metabolism in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis. Masato A, Plotegher N, Boassa D, Bubacco L. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14:35. doi: 10.1186/s13024-019-0332-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dopamine, behavior, and addiction. Wise RA, Jordan CJ. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28:83. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00779-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fundamental neurochemistry review: GABAA receptor neurotransmission and epilepsy: principles, disease mechanisms and pharmacotherapy. Bryson A, Reid C, Petrou S. J Neurochem. 2023;165:6–28. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Role of GABA in anxiety and depression. Kalueff AV, Nutt DJ. Depress Anxiety. 2007;24:495–517. doi: 10.1002/da.20262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cerebral low-molecular metabolites influenced by intestinal microbiota: a pilot study. Matsumoto M, Kibe R, Ooga T, Aiba Y, Sawaki E, Koga Y, Benno Y. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:9. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.The role of noradrenaline in cognition and cognitive disorders. Holland N, Robbins TW, Rowe JB. Brain. 2021;144:2243–2256. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Asano Y, Hiramoto T, Nishino R, et al. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:0–95. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00341.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Detection of neurotransmitter amines in microorganisms with the use of high-performance liquid chromatography. Tsavkelova EA, Botvinko IV, Kudrin VS, Oleskin AV. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10935181/ Dokl Biochem. 2000;372:115–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3047–3052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010529108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.The gastrointestinal tract microbiome, probiotics, and mood. Vitetta L, Bambling M, Alford H. Inflammopharmacology. 2014;22:333–339. doi: 10.1007/s10787-014-0216-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Melancholic microbes: a link between gut microbiota and depression? Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:713–719. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota-gut-brain communication. Dalile B, Van Oudenhove L, Vervliet B, Verbeke K. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:461–478. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Microbiota derived short chain fatty acids promote histone crotonylation in the colon through histone deacetylases. Fellows R, Denizot J, Stellato C, et al. Nat Commun. 2018;9:105. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02651-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Faecal short chain fatty acids profile is changed in Polish depressive women. Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Grochans E, Maciejewska D, et al. Nutrients. 2018;10:1939. doi: 10.3390/nu10121939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Short-chain fatty acids ameliorate depressive-like behaviors of high fructose-fed mice by rescuing hippocampal neurogenesis decline and blood-brain barrier damage. Tang CF, Wang CY, Wang JH, et al. Nutrients. 2022;14:1882. doi: 10.3390/nu14091882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Bercik P, Denou E, Collins J, et al. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:599–609. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kynurenine pathway metabolism and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G. Neuropharmacology. 2017;112:399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gamma-aminobutyric acid as a potential postbiotic mediator in the gut-brain axis. Braga JD, Thongngam M, Kumrungsee T. NPJ Sci Food. 2024;8:16. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00253-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Alteration of behavior and monoamine levels attributable to Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in germ-free mice. Liu WH, Chuang HL, Huang YT, Wu CC, Chou GT, Wang S, Tsai YC. Behav Brain Res. 2016;298:202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Increased plasma nitric oxide metabolites in suicide attempters. Lee BH, Lee SW, Yoon D, et al. Neuropsychobiology. 2006;53:127–132. doi: 10.1159/000092542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.An inducible nitric oxide synthase polymorphism is associated with the risk of recurrent depressive disorder. Gałecki P, Maes M, Florkowski A, Lewiński A, Gałecka E, Bieńkiewicz M, Szemraj J. Neurosci Lett. 2010;486:184–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.The capacity to produce Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) via cysteine degradation is ubiquitous in the human gut microbiome. Braccia DJ, Jiang X, Pop M, Hall AB. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:705583. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.705583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Decreased plasma hydrogen sulfide level is associated with the severity of depression in patients with depressive disorder. Yang YJ, Chen CN, Zhan JQ, Liu QS, Liu Y, Jiang SZ, Wei B. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:765664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.765664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Exogenous carbon monoxide produces rapid antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects. Luo Y, Ullah R, Wang J, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:757417. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.757417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Polyamines and gut microbiota. Tofalo R, Cocchi S, Suzzi G. Front Nutr. 2019;6:16. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Overview of the brain polyamine-stress-response: regulation, development, and modulation by lithium and role in cell survival. Gilad GM, Gilad VH. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003;23:637–649. doi: 10.1023/A:1025036532672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Implication of the polyamine system in mental disorders. Fiori LM, Turecki G. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2265312/ J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008;33:102–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Is agmatine an endogenous anxiolytic/antidepressant agent? Aricioglu F, Altunbas H. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1009:136–140. doi: 10.1196/annals.1304.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) as treatment for depression: a systematic review. Williams AL, Girard C, Jui D, Sabina A, Katz DL. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16021987/ Clin Invest Med. 2005;28:132–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression: from pathogenesis to treatment. Liu L, Wang H, Chen X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Xie P. EBioMedicine. 2023;90:104527. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.GABA production and structure of gadB/gadC genes in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains from human microbiota. Yunes RA, Poluektova EU, Dyachkova MS, et al. Anaerobe. 2016;42:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Di Vincenzo F, Del Gaudio A, Petito V, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F. Intern Emerg Med. 2024;19:275–293. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.The new '5-HT' hypothesis of depression: cell-mediated immune activation induces indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, which leads to lower plasma tryptophan and an increased synthesis of detrimental tryptophan catabolites (TRYCATs), both of which contribute to the onset of depression. Maes M, Leonard BE, Myint AM, Kubera M, Verkerk R. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35:702–721. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Microbiota in health and diseases. Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, et al. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. The impact of microbiota on the gut-brain axis: examining the complex interplay and implications. Chaudhry TS, Senapati SG, Gadam S, et al. J Clin Med. 2023;12:5231. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Signalling cognition: the gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Rusch JA, Layden BT, Dugas LR. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1130689. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1130689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stress, depression, diet, and the gut microbiota: human-bacteria interactions at the core of psychoneuroimmunology and nutrition. Madison A, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019;28:105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Emerging role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Solanki R, Karande A, Ranganathan P. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1149618. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1149618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bipolar disorders. McIntyre RS, Berk M, Brietzke E, et al. Lancet. 2020;396:1841–1856. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mood disorders: the gut bacteriome and beyond. McGuinness AJ, Loughman A, Foster JA, Jacka F. Biol Psychiatry. 2024;95:319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.The microbiome, immunity, and schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Dickerson F, Severance E, Yolken R. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;62:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Seroreactive marker for inflammatory bowel disease and associations with antibodies to dietary proteins in bipolar disorder. Severance EG, Gressitt KL, Yang S, et al. Bipolar Disord. 2014;16:230–240. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Making sense of the microbiome in psychiatry. Bastiaanssen TF, Cowan CS, Claesson MJ, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22:37–52. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Individuals hospitalized with acute mania have increased exposure to antimicrobial medications. Yolken R, Adamos M, Katsafanas E, et al. Bipolar Disord. 2016;18:404–409. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cognitive impairment by antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis: analysis of gut microbiota-brain communication. Fröhlich EE, Farzi A, Mayerhofer R, et al. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;56:140–155. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Proposal to unify Clostridium orbiscindens Winter et al. 1991 and Eubacterium plautii (Séguin 1928) Hofstad and Aasjord 1982, with description of Flavonifractor plautii gen. nov., comb. nov., and reassignment of Bacteroides capillosus to Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus gen. nov., comb. nov. Carlier JP, Bedora-Faure M, K'ouas G, Alauzet C, Mory F. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:585–590. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.016725-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Health effects of quercetin: from antioxidant to nutraceutical. Boots AW, Haenen GR, Bast A. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;585:325–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.An updated meta-analysis of oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder. Brown NC, Andreazza AC, Young LT. Psychiatry Res. 2014;218:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Relationship between cannabis and psychosis: reasons for use and associated clinical variables. Mané A, Fernández-Expósito M, Bergé D, et al. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:70–74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Revisiting inflammation in bipolar disorder. Fries GR, Walss-Bass C, Bauer ME, Teixeira AL. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019;177:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Epigenetics of the molecular clock and bacterial diversity in bipolar disorder. Bengesser SA, Mörkl S, Painold A, et al. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;101:160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.New evidence of gut microbiota involvement in the neuropathogenesis of bipolar depression by TRANK1 modulation: joint clinical and animal data. Lai J, Zhang P, Jiang J, et al. Front Immunol. 2021;12:789647. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.789647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gut microbes and metabolites as modulators of blood-brain barrier integrity and brain health. Parker A, Fonseca S, Carding SR. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:135–157. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1638722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Immunoneuropsychiatry - novel perspectives on brain disorders. Pape K, Tamouza R, Leboyer M, Zipp F. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:317–328. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0174-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states. Orihuela R, McPherson CA, Harry GJ. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173:649–665. doi: 10.1111/bph.13139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bipolar disorders. Vieta E, Berk M, Schulze TG, et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18008. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.The genome-wide risk alleles for psychiatric disorders at 3p21.1 show convergent effects on mRNA expression, cognitive function, and mushroom dendritic spine. Yang Z, Zhou D, Li H, et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:48–66. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0592-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Mice lacking neuronal calcium sensor-1 show social and cognitive deficits. Ng E, Georgiou J, Avila A, et al. Behav Brain Res. 2020;381:112420. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model. Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Almeida J, et al. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:313–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01022.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Mechanisms of synaptic transmission dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex: pathophysiological implications. Yan Z, Rein B. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:445–465. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01092-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Structure, expression, and function of kynurenine aminotransferases in human and rodent brains. Han Q, Cai T, Tagle DA, Li J. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:353–368. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Mellor AL, Munn DH. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:762–774. doi: 10.1038/nri1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Relationship between interferon-gamma, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism. Taylor MW, Feng GS. FASEB J. 1991;5:2516–2522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid cytokine and tryptophan catabolite alterations in psychiatric patients: comparisons between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Wang AK, Miller BJ. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44:75–83. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cerebrospinal fluid kynurenic acid is associated with manic and psychotic features in patients with bipolar I disorder. Olsson SK, Sellgren C, Engberg G, Landén M, Erhardt S. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:719–726. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) Müller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, et al. Mol Metab. 2019;30:72–130. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Glucagon-like peptide 1: an introduction and possible implications for neuropsychiatry. López-Ojeda W, Hurley RA. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024;36:0–86. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Expression and distribution of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor mRNA, protein and binding in the male nonhuman primate (Macaca mulatta) brain. Heppner KM, Kirigiti M, Secher A, et al. Endocrinology. 2015;156:255–267. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gut microbial dysbiosis and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: current evidence. Dai W, Liu J, Qiu Y, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:893567. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.893567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.The role of oxyntomodulin and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY) in appetite control. Wynne K, Bloom SR. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:612–620. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Mechanisms of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, and pancreatic polypeptide inhibition of identified green fluorescent protein-expressing GABA neurons in the hypothalamic neuroendocrine arcuate nucleus. Acuna-Goycolea C, Tamamaki N, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, van den Pol AN. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7406–7419. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1008-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Relationship of executive functioning deficits to N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in youth with bipolar disorder. Huber RS, Kondo DG, Shi XF, Prescot AP, Clark E, Renshaw PF, Yurgelun-Todd DA. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Psychotropics and the microbiome: a chamber of secrets. Cussotto S, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019;236:1411–1432. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-5185-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lithium treatment over the lifespan in bipolar disorders. Volkmann C, Bschor T, Köhler S. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Differential effects of psychotropic drugs on microbiome composition and gastrointestinal function. Cussotto S, Strain CR, Fouhy F, et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019;236:1671–1685. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Antidepressants, antimicrobials or both? Gut microbiota dysbiosis in depression and possible implications of the antimicrobial effects of antidepressant drugs for antidepressant effectiveness. Macedo D, Filho AJ, Soares de Sousa CN, Quevedo J, Barichello T, Júnior HV, Freitas de Lucena D. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Depression, antidepressant medications, and risk of Clostridium difficile infection. Rogers MA, Greene MT, Young VB, Saint S, Langa KM, Kao JY, Aronoff DM. BMC Med. 2013;11:121. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Investigation of antibacterial activity of sertralin (Article in Turkish) Coban AY, Tanriverdi Cayci Y, Keleş Uludağ S, Durupinar B. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20084919/ Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009;43:651–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Examination of antimicrobial activity of selected non-antibiotic medicinal preparations. Kruszewska H, Zareba T, Tyski S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23285704/ Acta Pol Pharm. 2012;69:1368–1371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Treatment of bipolar mania with atypical antipsychotics. Chengappa KN, Suppes T, Berk M. Expert Rev Neurother. 2004;4:0–25. doi: 10.1586/14737175.4.6.S17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Interaction between atypical antipsychotics and the gut microbiome in a bipolar disease cohort. Flowers SA, Evans SJ, Ward KM, McInnis MG, Ellingrod VL. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:261–267. doi: 10.1002/phar.1890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Synthesis, antimicrobial activity of lamotrigine and its ammonium derivatives. Qian Y, Lv PC, Shi L, et al. J Chem Sci. 2009;121:463–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Factors affecting the composition of the gut microbiota, and its modulation. Hasan N, Yang H. PeerJ. 2019;7:0. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.The mode of delivery affects the diversity and colonization pattern of the gut microbiota during the first year of infants' life: a systematic review. Rutayisire E, Huang K, Liu Y, Tao F. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:86. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0498-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.The gut microbiota and healthy aging: a mini-review. Kim S, Jazwinski SM. Gerontology. 2018;64:513–520. doi: 10.1159/000490615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation. Magrone T, Jirillo E. Immun Ageing. 2013;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-10-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ageing and the gut. Britton E, McLaughlin JT. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72:173–177. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Exploring the gut microbiota: lifestyle choices, disease associations, and personal genomics. Pedroza Matute S, Iyavoo S. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1225120. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1225120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans. Allen JM, Mailing LJ, Niemiro GM, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:747–757. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Cigarette smoking and human gut microbiota in healthy adults: a systematic review. Antinozzi M, Giffi M, Sini N, et al. Biomedicines. 2022;10:510. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Links of gut microbiota composition with alcohol dependence syndrome and alcoholic liver disease. Dubinkina VB, Tyakht AV, Odintsova VY, et al. Microbiome. 2017;5:141. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0359-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Acetate reprograms gut microbiota during alcohol consumption. Martino C, Zaramela LS, Gao B, et al. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4630. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31973-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Development and differences of intestinal flora in the neonatal period in breast-fed and bottle-fed infants. Yoshioka H, Iseki K, Fujita K. Pediatrics. 1983;72:317–321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.The role of the intestinal microflora for the development of the immune system in early childhood. Ouwehand A, Isolauri E, Salminen S. Eur J Nutr. 2002;41:1. doi: 10.1007/s00394-002-1105-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Role of diet and its effects on the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of mental disorders. Horn J, Mayer DE, Chen S, Mayer EA. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:164. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01922-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Catecholamine induced growth of gram negative bacteria. Lyte M, Ernst S. Life Sci. 1992;50:203–212. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90273-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Physiology and pathophysiology of splanchnic hypoperfusion and intestinal injury during exercise: strategies for evaluation and prevention. van Wijck K, Lenaerts K, Grootjans J, et al. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303:0–68. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00066.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Effects of psychological, environmental and physical stressors on the gut microbiota. Karl JP, Hatch AM, Arcidiacono SM, Pearce SC, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Doherty LA, Soares JW. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2013. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.The association between habitual diet quality and the common mental disorders in community-dwelling adults. Jacka FN, Mykletun A, Berk M, Bjelland I, Tell GS. Psychosom Med. 2011;73:483–490. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318222831a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.The impact of whole-of-diet interventions on depression and anxiety: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Opie RS, O'Neil A, Itsiopoulos C, Jacka FN. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2074–2093. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.A systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary patterns and depression in community-dwelling adults. Lai JS, Hiles S, Bisquera A, Hure AJ, McEvoy M, Attia J. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99:181–197. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.069880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.The microbiome-gut-brain axis in health and disease. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2017;46:77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.The effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms in humans: a systematic review. Wallace CJ, Milev R. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017;16:138. doi: 10.1186/s12991-017-0138-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Probiotic bifidobacterium longum ncc3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: a pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Hall GB, Ghajar K, et al. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:448–459. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Psychobiotics and the manipulation of bacteria-gut-brain signals. Sarkar A, Lehto SM, Harty S, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Burnet PW. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:763–781. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, et al. Science. 2016;352:565–569. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, et al. Cell. 2015;163:1079–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.The pros, cons, and many unknowns of probiotics. Suez J, Zmora N, Segal E, Elinav E. Nat Med. 2019;25:716–729. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0439-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.The role of the gut microbiome in predicting response to diet and the development of precision nutrition models. Part II: results. Hughes RL, Kable ME, Marco M, Keim NL. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:979–998. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES