Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a debilitating condition that can have significant effects on physical function and overall quality of life. Mechanisms of injury can vary from major trauma to low-energy falls. There has been a recent increase in the number of elderly patients with TSCI. A retrospective analysis of population-based hospital records linked with health care administrative datasets was conducted to measure age-standardized rates of TSCI over time. The study was conducted to describe the epidemiology and demographic characteristics of patients who experienced TSCI between 2001 and 2021 in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and rates of TSCI were evaluated over time. Linear regression was used to assess changes over time. The study identified 3622 patients with TSCI. The average age at the time of injury was 51.1 (standard deviation [SD] 21.19) and 75.0% were males. The average annual age-standardized rate in this population was 35.4 per million. The overall rate remained stable throughout the study period. The mean age at injury increased from 41.9 to 57.5 over the study period of 2001–2021 (p < 0.001). The most frequent causes of injury were low-energy falls (49.9%) and motor vehicle injuries (36.6%). The proportion of injuries related to falls increased over the study period (p < 0.001). Motor and sensory complete TSCI were seen in higher rates among younger patients, and cervical spine injuries were most common among all age-groups. The rate of TCSI was consistent during the study period, though the demographic of patients and their injury mechanism changed considerably; elderly low-energy falls were an increasing proportion of cases. Continued vigilance in elderly fall prevention is needed to reduce the incidence of TCSI among the elderly.
Keywords: administrative data, elderly, epidemiology, surgery, trauma, traumatic spinal cord injury, trends
Introduction
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a debilitating condition that can cause permanent motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction for those affected.1–3 Treatment for TSCIs is complex as many injuries result from an initial traumatic event followed by permanent disability and loss of function.4 TSCI further impacts the quality of life for patients after the initial injury with dysregulation in other body systems, such as sexual dysfunction, neuropathic pain, cardiovascular/autonomic instability, and muscular atrophy.5 As such, the management of TSCI often requires physician services, rehabilitation, allied health care, and pharmacologic management and treatment to cover a wide range of medical diagnoses, physical disabilities, and mental health conditions.6–8 Patients with TSCI have a higher utilization of health services and hospital costs compared to the general population, requiring access to both hospital and community-based services.9,10 Treatment and management are challenging and costly to health care systems, society, and the individual, as they absorb privately borne costs that are not reflected in public health spending.11–13
In general, TSCIs are rare, with the global annual incidence estimated at 23 persons per million with variations across countries, health care systems, population demographics, and socioeconomic conditions.14,15 In Canada, the incidence of TSCI has been estimated to be 32 persons per million based on health care administrative data.16 TSCIs are most prevalent among adult males (21–40 years) involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVC)17,18 and elderly patients who experience lower energy injuries such as falls from standing height.19,20 There is increasing evidence that the incidence of spinal cord injury among the elderly is increasing as populations are aging and individuals are living longer.21,22 Elderly patients often have higher medical needs during the acute injury, while undergoing rehabilitation and when discharged back to the community, while younger patients have a longer lifespan after the injury has occurred and have higher health care utilization.23 It has been estimated that the average lifetime cost of TSCI in a Canadian population is $336,000 CA per person, with initial hospitalization costs making up a large portion of this cost.24 A better understanding of the changes in these demographics of TSCI can allow for better planning and organization of resources to result in better outcomes for patients and improved access to care.25,26
To ascertain the most comprehensive rates of TSCI at the population level, administrative data is often used, recording each time a patient accesses health services.27 These data, which are often collected for remuneration of health services, cover a range of records including hospital visits and discharges, which merits its applicability for researching TSCI hospital admissions and health care utilization.28 Previous work has demonstrated a standard method for estimating TSCI rates using the International Statistical Classification of Disease (ICD) codes to define TSCI and applied in many countries that use this international standard.29 While administrative data clarify the epidemiology of TSCI rates, it lacks the depth that clinical data or registries can provide concerning details such as the mechanism of injury, neurological status, and specific treatments initiated.30,31 Thus, to better understand the changing epidemiology of TSCI, administrative datasets linked with clinical registry research can provide further insights into TSCI epidemiology.
The primary objective of this study was to report on the epidemiology of TSCI in British Columbia (BC), a province of Canada whose population is approximately five million insured residents. The Canadian single-payer system affords the opportunity to achieve a more comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology of TSCI, as all those who sustain a TSCI within the population are treated within a single-payer system and no patients are treated privately. Here, we utilized population-based health care administrative datasets linked with a clinical spinal cord injury registry to ascertain the annual age-standardized rate of TSCI, demographics, and mechanism of injury. A secondary objective was to evaluate trends over time and investigate if there were changes in the demographics of people experiencing TSCI throughout the study period.
Materials and Methods
Study population
This study was based on retrospective data from a population-based observational cohort of people sustaining a TCSI between January 2001 and December 2021. The eligible patient sample represented all incident cases of TSCI over this 20-year period in a geographic population estimated to be more than 5 million.
The TSCI cohort was created based on the ICD-10 diagnosis codes identified in hospital discharge records.29,31,32 The cohort identified patients with a new diagnosis and hospitalization for acute cervical, thoracic, and lumbar TSCIs or cauda equina syndrome over the study period. The TSCI case definition was validated by mapping ICD-10 CA codes to International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury descriptions of TSCI by level and severity (see Supplementary Appendix for the list of ICD-10 codes).31 Ethics approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (REB#: H22-02696).
Data sources and demographic/clinical variables
The analyses were based on health care administrative data from hospital discharge records, community physician services, and physician billing data that were collected as a routine part of patient care. These records were made available to researchers through Population Data BC.33 Population Data BC provides research access to linkable, longitudinal, de-identified patient-level datasets for all publicly insured individuals in the province. Data sources included the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database, BC Provincial Vital Statistics Agency (Deaths), the BC Trauma Registry, Medical Services Plan (MSP) Payment Information File, MSP Consolidation File (MSP Registration and Premium Billing), and the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR), and the protocol for linkage has been described elsewhere.31,32,34–37 The demographic and clinical variables collected include age, sex (male and female), Quintile of annual income per person equivalent (QAIPPE), date of admission, date of injury, mechanism of injury (MVC, falls, other), spinal column level (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) type/morphology of injury (complete vs. incomplete neurological injury), injury severity score (ISS),38 surgery performed (Yes or No), and length of hospital stay (in days). For cohort members, administrative and clinical data were deterministically linked using personal health number and date of birth. Surgical management of TSCI was identified using MSP billing codes for all neurosurgical and orthopedic spinal procedures performed during initial hospital admission. Those without procedure codes during this time were assigned as not receiving surgery.
Statistical analysis
Initial evaluation of the data was performed for the entire cohort of those with TSCI and then based on age-groups (including <15, 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and >74), for all demographic and clinical variables, including counts for categorical data and means for continuous data. The crude rate of TSCI was calculated per million using the population of BC during the given year from 2001 to 2021, obtained from provincial population estimates.39 Furthermore, age-standardized rates for each individual year and by sex were calculated based on the age population distribution for Canada from the 2001 census reference population.40 Trends and relationships over the 21-year study period were examined using analysis of variance statistical methods for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Relationships were examined for age-standardized rates, sex, mechanism of injury, level of neurological impairment, and operative rate. A linear regression model was used to assess trends in age over time for patients with TSCI. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS v9.4, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
During the 21-year study period from 2001 to 2021, we identified 3622 patients with TSCI. The mean age was 51.1 years (standard deviation [SD] 21.19) and 2718 (75.0%) were male. During initial acute hospital admission, 49.4% received spine surgery and the average acute length of stay lasted 67.4 days (SD 107.53). When the rehabilitation hospital admission was included, the average length of stay increased to 101.5 (SD 138.12). In-hospital mortality was found to be 6.2% for all patients (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic and Clinical Data for Patients with TSCI from 2001 to 2021
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| N | 3622 |
| Age (SD) | 51.1 (21.19) |
| Male | 2718 (75.0%) |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index | |
| 0 | 2871 (79.3%) |
| 1 | 398 (11.0%) |
| 2 | 192 (5.3%) |
| >3 | 161 (4.4%) |
| Quintile of annual income per person equivalent | |
| 1 | 850 (23.5%) |
| 2 | 712 (19.7%) |
| 3 | 675 (18.6%) |
| 4 | 628 (17.3%) |
| 5 | 612 (16.9%) |
| Missing | 145 (4.0%) |
| Injury level | |
| Cervical (C1–C8) | 2519 (69.5%) |
| Thoracic (T1–T12) | 647 (17.9%) |
| Lumbar (L1–L5) | 374 (10.3%) |
| Sacral /cauda (S1–S5) | 60 (1.7%) |
| Unknown | 22 (0.6%) |
| Complete injury | 727 (20.1%) |
| Incomplete injury | 2777 (76.7%) |
| Unknown | 38 (1.0%) |
| Tetraplegia | 2519 (69.5%) |
| Paraplegia | 1081 (29.8%) |
| Unknown | 22 (0.6%) |
| Spine surgery | |
| Yes | 1789 (49.4%) |
| No | 1833 (50.6%) |
| Injury Severity Score (ISS) (SD) | 24.5 (13.81) |
| Region | |
| Rural | 573 (15.8%) |
| Urban | 2980 (82.3%) |
| Unknown | 69 (1.9%) |
| Cause of injury | |
| Falls | 1807 (49.9%) |
| Motor vehicle collisions | 1324 (36.6%) |
| Other | 491 (13.6%) |
| LOS (acute) in days (SD) | 67.4 (107.53) |
| LOS including acute and rehabilitation in days (SD) | 101.5 (138.12) |
LOS, length of stay; SD, standard deviation; TSCI, traumatic spinal cord injury.
On average, over the course of the study, the annual age-standardized rate of TSCIs in BC was 35.4 persons per million, and the rate ranged from the lowest 29.8 persons per million in 2010 to the highest 39.3 persons per million in 2004. There was a significant increase in average age, from 41.9 (SD 19.34) to 57.5 (SD 20.66) (p < 0.001). Figure 1 presents the age-standardized rates of TSCI by year, and Figure 2A and 2B include the age-group-specific rates over time by sex. There is a notable decrease in rates of TSCI in young males under 35 years and an increase in rates in elderly populations over the age of 65. TSCI occurred most due to falls (49.9%) and MVC (36.6%).
FIG. 1.
Age-standardized incidence rates of TSCI in British Columbia from 2001to 2021. TSCI, traumatic spinal cord injury.
FIG. 2.
Age-specific rates for TSCI in BC, Canada, by age-group (0–14, 15–24, 25–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–74, and 75 years and older) and sex (male (M) and female (F)) over time (2001–2021). BC, British Columbia.
Figure 3 demonstrates the level of injury based on age-groups, with the majority of injuries for all age-groups being in the cervical spine with fewer thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in the older populations (>55 years of age). In total, 729 (20.1%) patients over the study period had complete spinal cord injuries, with higher rates of complete injury in younger age-groups (p < 0.001). Most patients had incomplete cervical-level injuries (58.1%), followed by complete cervical and incomplete thoracic injuries (11.0% and 10.2%, respectively). The ISS was calculated with a mean of 26.2 (SD 15.30), considered major trauma,41 and decrease in a severity with age (p < 0.001). Those who were less than 55 years old were more likely to be involved in MVC, whereas those >55 were more likely to have TSCI because of low-energy falls (see Fig. 4 for details). Figure 5 demonstrates surgical rates which have in total increased over the study period. Breaking down surgery rate by those who were 64 and younger versus 65 and older revealed the older population had less surgeries than the younger population but still increased over time.
FIG. 3.
Age-group and level of injury (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar/sacral).
FIG. 4.
Mechanism of injury by age-group (MVC, falls, and other). MVC, motor vehicle collisions.
FIG. 5.
Rate of operative treatment in age-groups 64 and younger versus age 65 and older.
Discussion
Our study found that between 2001 and 2021, the overall average annual rate of TSCI in BC was 35.4 per million patients per year; this rate remained fairly stable during this 21-year period. Over time, the rates of injury increased in those over the age of 75, and the average age of patients presenting with TSCI also increased. The age-specific rates for those over 75 years of age increased from 52.1 per million to 110.4 per million in this patient group during the 20 years of this study period. Furthermore, there was a higher proportion of patients in older age-groups with low-energy mechanisms for TSCI, such as falls, and with incomplete TSCIs. The results demonstrate a shifting demographic amongst those who have TSCI in that a larger proportion falls within an older age-group and further adds to the literature on rates of spinal cord injury within the shifting demographics of a population that is inexorably aging. This work helps to further understand where health care resources for the treatment of TSCI and its aftermath will undoubtedly need to be directed given these changes and highlights the need for fall prevention in the elderly.
The incidence rates for TSCI found through this analysis of more than 20 years of data are similar to other work using national data in Canada that determined the rates of TSCI across the country to be 35.4 TSCIs per million people and an increase in both age and the proportion of patients over the age of 75.16,42 Thorogood et al. provided comparative provincial TSCI rates with administrative data in Canada and provided projections of rates up to the year 2019. They found that BC had Canada’s second highest per million rate of TSCI at 36.43 per million (between 2005 and 2016), which is consistent with the rate reported in hospital administrative data.16 The rate has remained relatively consistent over time. Prior work evaluating BC from 1995 to 2004 found an average incidence of 35.7 per million and did not notice a significant change over 10 years.43
Over the period of the investigation, it was found that the average age at the time of injury for TSCI patients has significantly increased from 41.9 to 57.5 (p < 0.001) and that there was an increase in the proportion of those with TSCI who were over the age of 75 years. This trend has been seen in other health care systems, including the United Kingdom, which found that the mean age of TSCI increased by 8.5 years over a 20-year study period, and also in the United States, which found an increase of 9 years over a 50-year study period.20,44 This shift can be attributed to an aging population and a larger proportion of elderly patients sustaining SCI from low-energy falls.43 The Canadian general population has seen a 12% increase in those aged 85 years and older from 2016 to 2021 and is reportedly set to triple in size by 2046.45 Given the results of this and other studies, it is clear to see that the demographics of TSCI are changing with increased rates in elderly populations. This information is valuable to health system planners to ensure that appropriate care and rehabilitation after injury can be provided in a timely, safe, and effective manner.
While overall rates of TSCI have remained relatively stable in the last several decades; however, there was a trend identified for decreased rates of TSCI in young males under 35 years of age. While the primary cause of TSCI in the younger male population continues to be MVC and higher mechanism injuries, there has been much research and success with the improvement and safety of motor vehicles to prevent devastating injuries. This includes research and techniques focused on the use of seat belts, airbags, and reduction in handheld device use while driving, all of which have demonstrated improved safety and reduction in injury.46–48 This has been noted in similar research evaluating the incidence of TSCI, with decreasing rates of MVCs over time, providing a potential explanation for these findings.49,50
While patients are living longer lives, it is well-established that those who are older are more likely to suffer a low-energy mechanical fall, which can result in a myriad of injuries, including TSCI.51,52 Other injuries that have been associated with increasing age from mechanical falls include hip fractures,53 hand and wrist injuries,54 and vertebral compression fractures,55 all of which are associated with increasing morbidity on the individual and burden to the health care system. Given that the elderly population is at increased risk of TSCI from falls, strategies, and policies that support the prevention of low-energy injuries should be developed and implemented. Many strategies have been evaluated for the reduction of falls in the elderly population, including exercise and physical therapy programs to improve balance and strength, modifying the home environment to eliminate tripping hazards, minimizing psychoactive medications, and patient education.56 Research should continue in the role of prevention for spinal cord injury with efforts geared toward the elderly population and identifying those who are at risk of TSCI from falls.
This study also determined that the rate of surgical management for patients with acute TSCI across the entire province increased over the study period, with 40.4% of patients receiving surgery in 2002 to 51.2% in 2021. Previous data from British Columbia by Lenehan et al. demonstrated an increase in operation rate from 61.8% in 1995 to 86.4% in 2004, including only data from a large tertiary referral center for TSCI, where often patients are transferred to receive surgical management. Operative management for the majority of TSCI was still the most common treatment method given instability in the spinal column from the injury or ongoing compression requiring spinal instrumentation and decompression techniques. However, in those conditions where there is a spinal cord injury in the absence of instability such as central cord syndrome in elderly patients, nonoperative treatment may be considered. Studies evaluating surgical rates in the elderly populations with TSCI found significantly lower surgical rates than among those who were younger and had higher energy mechanisms.57 This is similar to the current study whereby on average surgical rates were lower in those aged 65 years or older, for example in 2021, operation rates were 60.5% in those under 65 and 36.8% in those over 65 years of age. Overall, operative management is still required in most cases of TSCI and is an important part of treatment to prevent further deterioration in neurological status and enable early mobilization and has become more common overtime as the treatment of choice especially in younger patients.
The strength of this study is evident in the use of health care administrative data that documents all interactions with the provincial health care system, providing a broad and in-depth evaluation of TSCI rates for the entire province. However, there are limitations to this study; this study includes only one province in Canada, and thus, the results are not representative of other jurisdictions. However, British Columbia represents a unique province for evaluation of TSCI as it is the third most populous province and has a higher incidence of TSCI than other provinces.16,58 Finally, this data was collected and linked with registry data from hospital administrative data-based diagnostic codes entered at the time of discharge or admission for services rendered. These codes may be inaccurately entered and may not represent the true extent of the injury; however, given the care for spinal cord injury, all significant injuries were likely captured, and the validation of the codes used has been previously done by this research group.31
Conclusions
In summary, overall rates of TSCIs have not changed significantly over the last 20 years, but there has been changes in the age specific trends over time. The most noticeable increase is among the elderly population suffering low-energy falls becoming the most common mechanism of TSCIs, further the rates of injury among young male adults are decreasing potentially due to improving safety regulations and trauma prevention. These findings are important to aid in informing health system and policy planning to ensure appropriate infrastructure and programs utilized for TSCI management. Continued efforts to encourage strategies to prevent TSCI should be funded and standardized to ensure implementation nationally, including falls prevention programs and optimizing trauma practices. Future research should evaluate and update changing trends in the TSCI population and explore the potential increased demands on health care placed on the health care system by the changing demographics.
Transparency, Rigor, and Reproducibility Statement
This study utilized discharge administrative data from Population Data BC for analysis. The data was obtained upon request from 2001 to 2021. Data use agreements prohibit sharing. Access to data provided by the Data Stewards is subject to approval but can be requested for research projects through the Data Stewards or their designated service providers. The following datasets were used in this study: (Consolidation file [includes demographics, registry, and census geodata], Hospital Separations, Medical Services Plan [MSP], Vital Events, and Statistics—Deaths, RHSCIR, BCTR, Vertebase/QISpine). You can find further information regarding these datasets by visiting the PopData project webpage at:
(https://my.popdata.bc.ca/project_listings/15-119/collection_approval_dates).
Due to the study’s retrospective nature, it was not pre-registered nor was analysis. The sample size was determined by the number of patients diagnosed in hospital with TSCI. The study utilized validated ICD-10 code definitions for inclusion. After screening, 3622 patients were included. Investigators knowledgeable in the relevant topic assessed key inclusions and outcomes to report on. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS v9.4. Sample size and power calculations were not conducted, as the dataset obtained was exceptionally large, ensuring the study was adequately powered.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following individuals for their contributions to the acquisition and preparation of data for this study: Jerome Buenaventura, Susan Jaglal, Shawna Cronin, Suzanne Humphreys Jijie Xu, Melody Chen, Zeina Waheed, and Nader Fallah. They thank Allan Aludino, Leilani Reichl, and the Vancouver Spine Program Team and Mei Chong, Lori Korchinski, Jaimini Thakore, Recep Gezer, and the rest of the Trauma Services BC team for their assistance in data provisioning and support.
Abbreviations Used
- BC
British Columbia
- ICD
International Statistical Classification of Disease
- ISS
Injury Severity Score
- LOS
Length of Stay
- MSP
Medical Services Plan
- MVC
Motor Vehicle Collisions
- QAIPPE
Quintile of annual income per person equivalent
- RHSCIR
Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry
- SD
Standard Deviation
- TSCI
Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Authors’ Contributions
M.B.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, and supervision. A.B.: Writing—original draft, visualization, and writing—review and editing. V.N.: Conceptualization, project administration, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition. N.R.-K.: Writing—review and editing and project administration. B.K.: Writing—review and editing and supervision. M.D.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, and supervision. G.L.: Software, formal analysis, data curation, and writing—review and editing. J.M.S.: Conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
Disclaimer
Inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the Data Steward(s).
Author Disclosure Statement
M.D. is the Cordula & Günter Paetzold Chair of Clinical Spinal Cord Injury Research at the University of British Columbia. B.K. is the Canada Research Chair in Spinal Cord Injury and Dvorak Chair in Spine Trauma at the University of British Columbia. The authors declare no competing interests related to this work.
Funding Information
This work was supported by funding from the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, the Canadian government, and the government of British Columbia.
Cite this article as: Bond M, Beresford A, Noonan V, et al. Epidemiology of spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada: 20 years of population-based administrative data, Neurotrauma Reports 2025:6 (1): 311–321, doi: 10.1089/neur.2025.0012.
References
- 1. Salaheen Z, Hejrati N, Wong IHY, et al. Complications and adverse events following traumatic spinal cord injury. In: Neural Repair and Regeneration after Spinal Cord Injury and Spine Trauma Elsevier; 2022; pp. 385–399; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819835-3.00002-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Silva NA, Sousa N, Reis RL, et al. From basics to clinical: A comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Prog Neurobiol 2014;114:25–57; doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang TY, Park C, Zhang H, et al. Management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A review of the literature. Front Surg 2021;8:698736; doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.698736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017;3:17018; doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-Cord Injury. Lancet Elsevier B.V.; 2002; pp. 417–425; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07603-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Post MWM, Van Leeuwen CMC. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: A review. In: Spinal Cord 2012;50(5):382–389; doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Skelton F, Hoffman JM, Reyes M, et al. Examining health-care utilization in the first year following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(6):690–695; doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rivers CS, Fallah N, Noonan VK, et al. ; RHSCIR Network . Health conditions: Effect on function, health-related quality of life, and life satisfaction after traumatic spinal cord injury. A prospective observational registry cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99(3):443–451; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Merritt CH, Taylor MA, Yelton CJ, et al. Economic impact of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the United States. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019;6; doi: 10.20517/2347-8659.2019.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sikka S, Callender L, Driver S, et al. Healthcare utilization following spinal cord injury: Objective findings from a regional hospital registry. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(2):194–200; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1505330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ruoss M, Brach M, Pacheco Barzallo D. Labor market costs for long-term family caregivers: The situation of caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res 2023;23(1):676; doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09565-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chari AV, Engberg J, Ray KN, et al. The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: New estimates from the American Time Use Survey. Health Serv Res 2015;50(3):871–882; doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Malekzadeh H, Golpayegani M, Ghodsi Z, et al. Direct cost of illness for spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Global Spine J 2022;12(6):1267–1281; doi: 10.1177/21925682211031190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lee BB, Cripps RA, Fitzharris M, et al. The global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: Update 2011, global incidence rate. Spinal Cord 2014;52(2):110–116; doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lu Y, Shang Z, Zhang W, et al. Global incidence and characteristics of spinal cord injury since 2000–2021: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2024;22(1):285; doi: 10.1186/S12916-024-03514-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thorogood NP, Noonan VK, Chen X, et al. Incidence and prevalence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada using health administrative data. Front Neurol 2023;14:1201025; doi: 10.3389/FNEUR.2023.1201025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sekhon LHS, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(Suppl 24):S2–S12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ning GZ, Wu Q, Li YL, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Asia: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35(4):229–239; doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wilson JR, Cronin S, Fehlings MG, et al. Epidemiology and impact of spinal cord injury in the elderly: Results of a fifteen-year population-based cohort study. J Neurotrauma 2020;37(15):1740–1751; doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.6985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. McCaughey EJ, Purcell M, Mclean AN, et al. Changing demographics of spinal cord injury over a 20-year period: A longitudinal population-based study in Scotland. Spinal Cord 2016;54(4):270–276; doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hagen EM, Eide GE, Rekand T, et al. A 50-year follow-up of the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Western Norway. Spinal Cord 2010;48(4):313–318; doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shin JC, Kim DH, Yu SJ, et al. Epidemiologic change of patients with spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(1):50–56; doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kern SB, Hunter LN, Sims AC, et al. Understanding the changing health care needs of individuals aging with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2019;25(1):62–73; doi: 10.1310/sci2501-62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chan BCF, Cadarette SM, Wodchis WP, et al. The lifetime cost of spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada: A population-based study from the perspective of the public health care payer. J Spinal Cord Med 2019;42(2):184–193; doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1486622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Anonymous. Epidemiology is a science of high importance. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1703; doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04243-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: A large population-based study. Spinal Cord 2022;60(9):812–819; doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00795-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cadarette SM, Wong L. An introduction to health care administrative data. Can J Hosp Pharm 2015;68(3):232–237; doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Jaglal SB, Munce SEP, Guilcher SJ, et al. Health system factors associated with rehospitalizations after traumatic spinal cord injury: A population-based study. Spinal Cord 2009;47(8):604–609; doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Noonan VK, Thorogood NP, Fingas M, et al. The validity of administrative data to classify patients with spinal column and cord injuries. J Neurotrauma 2013;30(3):173–180; doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Casey JA, Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, et al. Using electronic health records for population health research: A review of methods and applications. Annu Rev Public Health 2016;37:61–81; doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Noonan VK, Jaglal SB, Humphreys S, et al. Linking spinal cord injury data sets to describe the patient journey following injury: A protocol. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2020;26(4):232–242; doi: 10.46292/SCI20-00016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Discharge Abstracts Database (Hospital Separations) Data Set: V2. 2019. Available from: https://www.popdata.bc.ca/data/health/dad [Last accessed: March 20, 2024].
- 33. Ark TK, Kesselring S, Hills B, et al. Population data BC: Supporting population data science in British Columbia. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020;4(2):1133; doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Noonan VK, Kwon BK, Soril L, et al. ; RHSCIR Network . The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): A national patient-registry. Spinal Cord 2012;50(1):22–27; doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Vital Events Deaths. V2. 2019. Available from: https://www.popdata.bc.ca/data/demographic/vs_deaths [Last accessed: March 20, 2024].
- 36. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Medical Services Plan (MSP) payment information file. V2. 2019. Available from: https://www.popdata.bc.ca/node/677 [Last accessed: March 20, 2024].
- 37. British Columbia Ministry of Health. Central Demographics File (MSP Registration and Premium Billings, Client Roster and Census Geodata)/Consolidation File (MSP Registration and Premium Billing) Data Set. 2019.
- 38. Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J, et al. ICISS: An international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma 1996;41(3):380–388; doi: 10.1097/00005373-199609000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Government of British Columbia. BC Population Estimates & Projections. 2024. Available from: https://bcstats.shinyapps.io/popApp/ [Last accessed: March 10, 2025].
- 40. Statistics Canada. 2001 Census: Canada. 2001. Available from: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/English/census01/products/analytic/companion/fam/canada.cfm [Last accessed: March 10, 2025].
- 41. Palmer C. Major trauma and the injury severity score-where should we set the bar? Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 2007;51:13–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31(7):799–805; doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000207258.80129.03 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lenehan B, Street J, Kwon BK, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37(4):321–329; doi: 10.1097/BRS.0B013E31822E5FF8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Devivo MJ, Chen Y. Trends in new injuries, prevalent cases, and aging with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(3):332–338; doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hallman S. A Portrait of Canada’s Growing Population Aged 85 and Older from the 2021 Census . Census of Population; 2021. 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Injury Center C. Policy Impact: Seat Belts. Injury Center C; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 47. McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, et al. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. BMJ 2005;331(7514):428–430; doi: 10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Reed MA, Naftel RP, Carter S, et al. Motor vehicle restraint system use and risk of spine injury. Traffic Inj Prev 2006;7(3):256–263; doi: 10.1080/15389580600660641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Aarabi B, Albrecht JS, Simard JM, et al. Trends in demographics and markers of injury severity in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2021;38(6):756–764; doi: 10.1089/NEU.2020.7415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Chiu AK, Pease TJ, Prakash H, et al. The changing epidemiology of traumatic spine injuries: A trends analysis of 26 years of patients at a major level 1 trauma center in the United States. Spine J 2024;24(9):1561–1570; doi: 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2024.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gao J, Gao Q, Huo L, et al. Impaired activity of daily living status of the older adults and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(23); doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Salari N, Darvishi N, Ahmadipanah M, et al. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2022;17(1):334; doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lim SK, Choi K, Heo NH, et al. Characteristics of fragility hip fracture-related falls in the older adults: A systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging 2024;28(10):100357; doi: 10.1016/J.JNHA.2024.100357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. An increasing number of hand injuries in an elderly population – A retrospective study over a 30-year period. BMC Geriatr 2018;18(1):68–67; doi: 10.1186/S12877-018-0758-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Dong Y, Peng R, Kang H, et al. Global incidence, prevalence, and disability of vertebral fractures: A systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Spine J 2022;22(5):857–868; doi: 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2021.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lee A, Lee KW, Khang P. Preventing falls in the geriatric population. Perm J 2013;17(4):37–39; doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Arul K, Ge L, Ikpeze T, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injuries in geriatric population: Etiology, management, and complications. J Spine Surg 2019;5(1):38–45; doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.02.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Statistics Canada. Population and Dwelling Counts: Canada, Provinces and Territories. Statistics Canada; 2022. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





