Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1990 Oct;126(2):375–385. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.2.375

Copia Expression Is Variable among Natural Populations of Drosophila

A K Csink 1, J F McDonald 1
PMCID: PMC1204192  PMID: 1700962

Abstract

A survey of copia (retroviral-like element) expression in flies representing 37 populations worldwide of Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana demonstrates that, although copia elements are present in all three species, copia-encoded transcripts are detectable only in D. melanogaster. Levels of copia transcripts vary nearly 100-fold among flies representing geographically diverse populations of D. melanogaster and this variation is not correlated with variability in copia copy number. Analysis of transcript levels in interpopulation hybrids demonstrates that much of this variability may be attributable to the action of trans-acting controls. The geographic and phylogenetic pattern of copia expression suggests that moderate to high levels of copia expression may be a relatively recent evolutionary acquisition. The potential evolutionary significance of these findings is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnault C., Biémont C. Heat shocks do not mobilize mobile elements in genomes of Drosophila melanogaster inbred lines. J Mol Evol. 1989 May;28(5):388–390. doi: 10.1007/BF02603073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bucheton A., Paro R., Sang H. M., Pelisson A., Finnegan D. J. The molecular basis of I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: identification, cloning, and properties of the I factor. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90536-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Callahan R., Chiu I. M., Wong J. F., Tronick S. R., Roe B. A., Aaronson S. A., Schlom J. A new class of endogenous human retroviral genomes. Science. 1985 Jun 7;228(4704):1208–1211. doi: 10.1126/science.2408338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. David J. R., Capy P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 1988 Apr;4(4):106–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dowsett A. P., Young M. W. Differing levels of dispersed repetitive DNA among closely related species of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4570–4574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunsmuir P., Brorein W. J., Jr, Simon M. A., Rubin G. M. Insertion of the Drosophila transposable element copia generates a 5 base pair duplication. Cell. 1980 Sep;21(2):575–579. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90495-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. "A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity". Addendum. Anal Biochem. 1984 Feb;137(1):266–267. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Finnegan D. J., Fawcett D. H. Transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1986;3:1–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Langley C. H., Montgomery E., Hudson R., Kaplan N., Charlesworth B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res. 1988 Dec;52(3):223–235. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300027695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClanahan T., McEntee K. DNA damage and heat shock dually regulate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;6(1):90–96. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.1.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Montgomery E., Charlesworth B., Langley C. H. A test for the role of natural selection in the stabilization of transposable element copy number in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1987 Feb;49(1):31–41. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pardue M. L., Gall J. G. Nucleic acid hybridization to the DNA of cytological preparations. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;10:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60727-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rivin C. J., Cullis C. A., Walbot V. Evaluating quantitative variation in the genome of Zea mays. Genetics. 1986 Aug;113(4):1009–1019. doi: 10.1093/genetics/113.4.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stavenhagen J. B., Robins D. M. An ancient provirus has imposed androgen regulation on the adjacent mouse sex-limited protein gene. Cell. 1988 Oct 21;55(2):247–254. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strand D. J., McDonald J. F. Copia is transcriptionally responsive to environmental stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Jun 25;13(12):4401–4410. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.12.4401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. THOMPSON P. E. Asynapsis and mutability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1962 Mar;47:337–349. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.3.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Temin H. M. Viruses, protoviruses, development, and evolution. J Cell Biochem. 1982;19(2):105–118. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240190202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas P. S. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5201–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vouidibio J., Capy P., Defaye D., Pla E., Sandrin J., Csink A., David J. R. Short-range genetic structure of Drosophila melanogaster populations in an Afrotropical urban area and its significance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(21):8442–8446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES