Skip to main content
Microbial Cell logoLink to Microbial Cell
. 2025 Apr 15;12:93–108. doi: 10.15698/mic2025.04.848

Influence of cervicovaginal microbiota on Chlamydia trachomatis infection dynamics

Emily Hand 1, Indriati Hood-Pishchany 1,2, Toni Darville 1,2, Catherine M O'Connell 1,
PMCID: PMC12042374  PMID: 40309355

Abstract

The cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) is increasingly being considered as an important aspect of women’s health, particularly in relation to the risk and progression of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). CVM composition varies significantly between individuals and is shaped by factors including diet, age, environmental exposures, and lifestyle. Understanding these influences may shed light on how microbial imbalances contribute to infection susceptibility and the development of reproductive health disorders. Five distinct community state types (CSTs) classify common CVM compositions. Most CSTs (I, II, III, V) are characterized by a dominant Lactobacillus species and are associated with better or neutral reproductive health, including reduced coincident detection of STIs such as Chlamydia trachomatis. In contrast, CST IV is composed of diverse, predominantly anaerobic, microbial species and is associated with CVM dysbiosis, bacterial vaginosis, and a heightened risk of STI acquisition. This review examines the complex interplay between the CVM, C. trachomatis infection, and host immune responses, highlighting the role of metabolites such as short-chain and long-chain fatty acids, indole, and iron in modulating pathogen survival and host defenses. Additionally, the impacts of CVM composition on C. trachomatis persistence, ascension, and clearance are discussed, alongside co-infection dynamics with pathogens like Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Keywords: chlamydia, gonorrhea, lactobacilli, microbiome, 16S rRNA, immunity, multiomics

Abbreviations

CPAF - Chlamydial Protease Activity Factor,

CSTs - community state types,

CVM - cervicovaginal microbiome,

EBs - elementary bodies,

LCFAs - long chain fatty acids,

PID - pelvic inflammatory disease,

PMNs - polymorphonuclear leukocytes,

RBs - reticulate bodies,

SCFAs - short chain fatty acids,

STIs - sexually transmitted infections,

TLR - Toll-like receptor,

TRAC - T cell Response Against Chlamydia,

VMT - vaginal microbiota transplant.

INTRODUCTION

A microbiome is a collective community of microbes—including bacteria, viruses, archaea, and fungi—that inhabit a specific host environment. Over the past two decades, research has increasingly focused on the gut microbiome, yielding significant discoveries regarding the impact of its microbial communities on human health and disease. Advances in this field have enabled translational applications, such as fecal transplants and probiotic therapies, which have proven effective in managing conditions like Clostridium difficile infection, ulcerative colitis, and recurrent urinary tract infections 1,2,3,4. The gut microbiome is a highly diverse ecosystem, with its composition varying across different populations and individuals. However, healthy gut microbiomes are typically dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, along with Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria 5,6,7. In a study analyzing ~3400 healthy adults, the relative abundance of Firmicutes ranged widely from 6% to 100%, while Bacteroidetes varied from 0% to 90%, underscoring the diverse gut microbiome compositions present within healthy populations 8. Numerous factors—such as diet, environment, and physical activity—shape this variability in gut microbiome composition, contributing to the individual diversity seen across populations. Additionally, the gut microbiome composition has been linked to host immune functions, influencing disease progression and resolution 9. Gut microbes can inhibit opportunistic pathogens and regulate innate and adaptive immune cell functions. Understanding these interactions may offer insights into the dynamics of other less intensively studied human microbiomes, such as the cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM).

The CVM is a dynamic microbial community with lower overall diversity than the gut microbiome 5. Factors such as menstruation, age, contraceptive use, hormones, and sexual activity shape CVM composition 10,11. The CVM plays a pivotal role in reproductive health and disease, influencing susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as Chlamydia trachomatis (Figure 1). The composition of the CVM is classified into community state types (CSTs), based on the dominant bacterial species present. In a study using 16s rRNA gene sequencing, Ravel et al. identified five common CSTs (I-V) in a cohort of 396 women 12. CSTs I, II, III, and V are each dominated by a single Lactobacillus species (L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii, respectively) 12 and are typically associated with low microbial diversity and positive reproductive health outcomes 13,14,15. In contrast, CST IV, characterized by diverse anaerobic bacterial genera with low Lactobacillus presence 12, is linked to adverse conditions such as bacterial vaginosis 16, pregnancy loss 17, and pre-term birth 18. New classifications and sub-classifications within CSTs are emerging with advancements in methodology and larger, more diverse sampling efforts 19,20,21.

Figure 1. FIGURE 1: Summary of cervicovaginal microbiome risk factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Figure 1

A summary of microbes, microbial products, and co-pathogens in the CVM that are associated with increasing risk of C. trachomatis infection acquisition and ascension.

This review examines the complex interplay between the CVM, C. trachomatis infection, and host immune responses, highlighting the role of metabolites such as short-chain and long-chain fatty acids, indole, and iron in modulating pathogen survival and host defenses. Additionally, the impacts of CVM composition on chlamydial persistence, ascension, and clearance are discussed, alongside co-infection dynamics with pathogens like Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Lactobacillus species are present in both the gut and CVM, and it has been proposed that strains resident in the CVM originated in the gut 22. Analyzing site-specific data is important because of the unique roles that the gut microbiome and the CVM play in host health. At both mucosal sites, lactic acid-producing Lactobacilli contribute to maintaining homeostasis and reducing inflammation 23,24,25,26. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are metabolic by-products including acetate, propionate, butyrate, and succinate, which are produced by microbes present in both the gut microbiome and the CVM 27. However, the abundance and function of SCFAs differ between these sites. In a healthy gut, SCFAs such as butyrate and propionate—primarily produced by Firmicutes and Bacteroides -support a low pH, promoting growth of beneficial Lactobacillus species that protect against pathogen colonization 28. SCFAs have anti-inflammatory properties, enhancing antimicrobial peptide production and mucus secretion, reducing the risk of bacterial translocation, or “leaky gut” 5,29,30. Conversely, CVM-derived SCFAs are linked to dysbiosis and tend to trigger pro-inflammatory responses, often associated with bacterial vaginosis 31,32,33. These contrasting effects may be due to variations in SCFA concentrations, microbial interactions, or the cell types present in each environment. Thus, while similar SCFAs are generated within both microbiomes, their physiological impacts diverge significantly depending on the site.

Like the gut microbiome, the CVM modulates immune responses, influencing the host’s capacity to prevent or resolve infections. Research has shed light on the impact of microbiome composition on the establishment, persistence, and clearance of STIs, affecting susceptibility to pathogens like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 34, herpes simplex virus 35, Mycoplasma genitalium, and C. trachomatis infection 14,36. CVM composition has been shown to affect the risk of acquiring C. trachomatis, with active chlamydial infection in turn altering CVM dynamics 14,36,37,38. C. trachomatis infection activates the host’s innate and adaptive immune responses, notably increasing neutrophil presence and upregulating T cell cytokine production (reviewed in 39,40). Technologic advances and multiomic approaches are expanding opportunities to study the complex interactions of host, pathogens, and CVM, enhancing our understanding of how these interactions influence health outcomes.

C. TRACHOMATIS DEVELOPMENT

C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen and the most prevalent bacterial STI worldwide 41. Approximately 1.6 million cases were reported in 2022 in the United States, 42, though this figure was likely underestimated due to limited screening during the Covid-19 pandemic 43. Although antibiotic treatments are effective at clearing C. trachomatis infections, 70% of cases in individuals with a uterus are asymptomatic, and often remain undiagnosed 44. If untreated, infection can ascend from the cervix to the upper genital tract, leading to complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and tubal factor infertility 41. In individuals with a penis, around 50% of infections are asymptomatic, and untreated cases can result in urethritis, proctitis, and epididymitis 45,46. There are multiple serovars of C. trachomatis comprising two major biovars. Strains of serovar A, B, and C cause ocular trachoma, while serovars D through K cause genital infections 47. Strains belonging to serovars L1, L2, and L3 cause lymphogranuloma venereum 47.

C. trachomatis has a biphasic developmental cycle that begins when infectious extracellular elementary bodies (EBs) attach to host epithelial cells 48. EBs adhere to the host cell and induce invagination of the host cell membrane, forming an intracellular protective vacuole called an “inclusion.” Chlamydial effector proteins remodel and expand the inclusion and EBs differentiate into metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs), which depend on host cell metabolites for essential nutrients and energy intermediates to sustain replication 49. After replication, RBs redifferentiate into infectious EBs, which exit the host cell either by cell lysis or extrusion, to continue the infection cycle in adjacent cells or a new host 50. Alternatively, RBs may enter a “persistent” state, forming aberrant bodies under conditions of nutrient deprivation or antibiotic exposure 51,52,53,54. Aberrant RBs exhibit reduced metabolic activity, ceasing division but remaining viable. When conditions improve, aberrant forms revert to normal development, producing infectious progeny to sustain the infection 55,56,57.

The host immune response targets C. trachomatis replication by exploiting the pathogen's dependence on tryptophan 52. A critical mechanism of chlamydial inhibition and immune defense is the production of IFNγ by natural killer cells and adaptive T cells 51,58,59,60. IFNγ reduces tryptophan availability via the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) enzyme 51,61, thus encouraging the formation of chlamydial aberrant bodies 51,52. Iron is another critical nutrient for C. trachomatis survival and its depletion similarly triggers aberrant body formation 62,63. Additionally, chlamydia-specific T cells produce tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), which further inhibits chlamydial infection by activating oxidative pathways in epithelial cells and phagocytes, and by stimulating adaptive T cell responses 64. Together, these immune responses limit the pathogen's replication and promote immune protection.

MECHANISMS OF CERVICOVAGINAL MICROBIOTA MODULATION OF C. TRACHOMATIS INFECTION

Lactobacillus species

Lactobacillus species predominate four of the five commonly described CSTs. Lactobacillus-dominated CVMs are typically considered “healthy,” and are often protective against STIs, including C. trachomatis 14,15,65. The protective effects of Lactobacillus are thought to stem from several mechanisms. First, they act directly against C. trachomatis through production of lactic acid 66, which reduces the cervicovaginal pH, creating an inhospitable environment. Additionally, a robust Lactobacillus community may outcompete C. trachomatis and other pathogens for essential nutrients, limiting their ability to establish infection 27. Finally, Lactobacillus species contribute to CVM homeostasis by promoting an anti-inflammatory environment 27,67. The presence of L. crispatus and L. jensenii, for instance, is associated with decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα 24,27,68. These combined mechanisms support a healthy CVM and help reduce susceptibility to STIs.

Not all Lactobacillus species offer the same level of protection against C. trachomatis. Among Lactobacillus species, L. crispatus (CST I) demonstrates the strongest protective effect against C. trachomatis 65,69,70. However, CST III, which is dominated by L. iners, has been linked to a higher incidence of C. trachomatis infections 13,14,38,69. Unlike other CVM-associated Lactobacillus species that produce D-and L-lactic acid, L. iners synthesizes only L-lactic acid 71. D-lactic acid has stronger antimicrobial properties, more effectively inhibiting pathogens than L-lactic acid 14,72,73. In vitro, D-lactic acid also inhibits epithelial cell proliferation, which normally promotes chlamydial infection 14. In L. iners-dominated CVMs, a low D- to L-lactic acid ratio correlated with increased epithelial production of the extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer (EMMPRIN) 72, that upregulates matrix metalloprotease-8 (MMP-8). This activity undermines extracellular matrix integrity, facilitating pathogen spread to the upper genital tract 72. L. iners does not produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a by-product of many other Lactobacillus species that may also contribute to protection against STIs and bacterial vaginosis-associated microbes 74. However, in vitro studies suggest that lactic acid, rather than H2O2, is the primary anti-chlamydial metabolite produced by Lactobacillus 66,75. Thus, L. iners' lack of H₂O₂ production does not fully explain its comparatively weaker protective effects against C. trachomatis.

Fatty acids

Reduced lactic acid levels, CST IV composition, and bacterial vaginosis have all been linked to higher rates of C. trachomatis infection 15,59,76. Some of the anaerobic microbes commonly associated with CST IV produce SCFAs 5,77, which may negatively affect the cervicovaginal cellular environment 77. Supporting evidence from human cohort data indicates that increased SCFA production correlates with CVM dysbiosis and reduced lactic acid abundance 33,77,78. Since SCFAs are mainly by-products of CST IV-associated microbes, their prevalence may outcompete lactic acid-producing Lactobacillus, leading to a shift in overall lactic acid levels that dampens the environmental defense against STIs.

SCFAs produced by bacterial vaginosis-associated microbes in the CVM may alter the host immune response to influence susceptibility to C. trachomatis and may increase or decrease infection risk, depending on whether the SCFAs exert pro- or anti- inflammatory effects. Generally, CVM-derived SCFAs are considered pro-inflammatory, which tends to increase susceptibility to STIs. However, data on SCFA-related immune modulation in the lower female genital tract has been contradictory. For instance, when a monocytic cell line was treated with different SCFAs, succinic acid strongly inhibited chemotaxis, while acetic acid only slightly reduced it 25. Inhibiting chemotaxis reduces immune cell recruitment to infection sites, dampening inflammation and limiting the immune response.

SCFAs in the gut microbiome are well-known for their anti-inflammatory effects. They play a crucial role in maintaining intestinal health by regulating immune responses, preserving the intestinal barrier, and promoting the development and function of regulatory T cells. 29,79,80. In a healthy gut, SCFAs—primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate—are produced at relatively high concentrations, ranging from 20-140 mM, depending on the specific SCFA and location within the intestine 81. These high levels contribute to a balanced immune environment, protection against pathogens, and enhanced epithelial barrier function.

In contrast, CVM-derived SCFAs appear to have different physiological consequences, likely due to significant concentration differences and the unique environment of the vaginal mucosa. Under normal conditions, vaginal SCFA levels are very low (0-10 mM). However, during dysbiosis, such as bacterial vaginosis, these levels can increase to 20 mM or higher 25,82. Unlike in the gut, elevated SCFA concentrations in the cervicovaginal region are often associated with inflammation, disruption of the vaginal epithelial barrier, and increased susceptibility to infections. These effects may stem from the acidic pH and distinct immune landscape of the vagina, which differ markedly from the gut environment. The differing concentrations and local environments suggest that SCFAs may shift from anti-inflammatory roles in the gut to potentially pro-inflammatory or disruptive roles in the CVM. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these contrasting effects remain poorly defined and are an important area for future research. Understanding how SCFAs influence immunity and barrier function in the CVM compared to the gut could provide key insights into microbial dysbiosis and related health outcomes.

An in vitro study by Mirmonsef, et al. illustrates how SCFA concentrations impact immune function 83. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells and neutrophils were exposed to high concentrations (20 mM) of acetic and butyric acids, they showed increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production (IL-8, IL-6, and IL-1b) 83. However, at low concentrations (0.02-2 mM), these SCFAs did not trigger inflammatory cytokine production 83. Moreover, low levels of SCFAs combined with Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands prompted pro-inflammatory responses, specifically IL-8 and TNFα, suggesting that SCFAs might interact with the immune environment to enhance inflammation 83. Interestingly, similar tests using neutrophils showed that TLR ligands with SCFAs mildly induced IL-8 and had no effect on TNFα production 83, highlighting that cell type, SCFA concentration, and SCFA type all affect the immune response. These findings suggest that SCFAs are not solely responsible for the pro-inflammatory environment associated with CST IV and bacterial vaginosis, which are both linked to a heightened risk of C. trachomatis infection. Instead, it’s likely that other CVM metabolites contribute to this environment.

Delgado-Diaz, et al., investigated the effect of SCFAs on pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in vitro using three physiologically relevant cell types - ectocervical epithelial (Ect), vaginal epithelial (VK2), and primary epithelial cells recovered from cervicovaginal tissue - by administration of acetic acid, butyric acid, or succinic acid and/or TLR stimulation 67. They determined that mixed SCFA concentrations (acetic acid 100 mM, butyric acid 4 mM, succinic acid 20 mM, propionic acid 4 mM) increased TNFα production in all three cell types, but only after prolonged exposure (24 hr). The researchers further observed cell-type-specific responses when mixed SCFAs were combined with TLR agonists. Although SCFAs potentiated TLR-induced TNFα production in all three cell types, only Ect cells produced IL-8, while secretion of RANTES and IP-10 was inhibited across all cell types. Administration of acetic acid alone induced TNFα production by Ect and VK2 cells but not primary cells. These findings suggest that immune modulation in response to SCFA is multifactorial, influenced by cell type, SCFA in combination versus alone, concentration, pH, exposure duration, and simultaneous presence of TLR agonists (e.g., viral or bacterial pathogens). This study highlights the importance of using physiologically relevant models to understand how SCFAs and CVM composition influence immune response and STI susceptibility.

Elevated levels of long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) in cervical fluid - including pentadecanoic, heptadecanoic, and oleic acids - have been associated with C. trachomatis infection 77. In a metabolomic study by Borgogna, et al., women with C. trachomatis or C. trachomatis/M. genitalium coinfection exhibited significantly higher LCFA concentrations compared to uninfected participants 77. Microbes that produce LCFAs, particularly anaerobes such as Prevotella species, are abundant in CST IV 25. CT’s dependence on LCFAs for maintaining its inclusion and sustaining infection has been well documented 84. Extracellular LCFAs are transported into the inclusion via acyl carrier proteins and are available for use by replicating chlamydiae 85. The correlation between increased LCFA levels in cervical fluid during C. trachomatis infection and the pathogen’s reliance on these fatty acids suggests that a CVM rich in LCFA-producing anaerobes could support C. trachomatis infection. Despite the theorized benefit that a LCFA-enriched CVM might provide to C. trachomatis, recent findings by Zhu, et al. suggest a protective, anti-bacterial vaginosis role for LCFAs, specifically oleic acid 86. Since bacterial vaginosis is an established risk factor for C. trachomatis infection, their findings imply that oleic acid supports a CVM that is less conducive to C. trachomatis proliferation. In their in vitro study, Zhu, et al. demonstrated that supraphysiological levels of oleic acid inhibited growth of bacterial vaginosis-associated (CST IV) anaerobes and L. iners (CST III), while enhancing L. crispatus (CST I), the species considered to be most protective against C. trachomatis infection 86.

Overall, current data does not provide a definitive conclusion regarding the role of LCFAs on susceptibility to C. trachomatis infection and subsequent clearance. Although it seems increased levels of LCFAs tend to be conducive to C. trachomatis infection, it is not clear how the addition of supraphysiological levels of LCFAs may impact C. trachomatis acquisition and/or ascension. Fatty acids perform multiple functions, and their effects may vary depending on anatomical location, cellular interactions, and external influences (e.g., infection status, diet). Additionally, the contribution of fatty acids from the host itself are not clearly defined, thus fatty acids in the CVM could be both host and microbe derived. These mixed findings highlight the need for additional in vitro and in vivo studies to clarify the causal and mechanistic impacts of LCFA and SCFA concentrations on C. trachomatis during natural infection. Broadening focus to the metabolome could provide more nuanced insights into the association between metabolomic by-products, CVM composition, and infection risk.

Indole

C. trachomatis relies on host-derived tryptophan for replication. Natural killer cells, macrophages and chlamydia-specific T cells release IFNγ, which induces production of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), an enzyme that degrades tryptophan, limiting its availability for C. trachomatis. Since C. trachomatis cannot synthesize tryptophan de novo, intracellular depletion leads to growth arrest. Under extreme tryptophan starvation and IFNγ exposure, C. trachomatis enters a persistent state characterized by viable but non-replicating forms 87,88. However, genital C. trachomatis serovars can adapt by expressing a functional tryptophan synthase, encoded by trpBA 89,90, that can utilize indole, a CVM-generated intermediate 91,92,93. CST IV is populated with diverse indole-producing anaerobes, including Prevotella spp. 12. This adaptation has enabled C. trachomatis to better evade IFNγ-induced tryptophan depletion in an environment rich in Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens 58,59. Furthermore, anaerobes, including those that produce indole, raise the CVM pH 51, creating an environment more conducive to colonization by a variety of pathogens, including C. trachomatis.

Iron

C. trachomatis depends on its host cell to obtain essential nutrients, including iron 62. Iron plays a crucial role in survival for nearly all organisms, as it supports biochemical processes such as the electron transport chain and tricarboxylic acid cycle. In host-pathogen interactions, the host may employ “nutritional immunity” to limit iron availability, restricting pathogens’ access to this essential resource as a defense mechanism 94. Under low-iron conditions, C. trachomatis adopts a persistent state to survive; transcriptional studies have shown that C. trachomatis in iron-deprived environments redirects its transcriptional focus from replication to nutrient storage, a strategy that helps it endure until environmental conditions improve 95.

Iron scarcity also impacts host cell metabolism and gene expression, indirectly affecting the supply of other substrates required for chlamydial development 96. While iron is vital for C. trachomatis development, the mechanisms employed by C. trachomatis to respond to iron scarcity and iron acquisition are not entirely understood. C. trachomatis lacks many typical bacterial pathways for iron uptake, complicating our understanding of its iron-acquisition strategies. However, proteins encoded by the genes of the ytgABCD operon are thought to play a central role in C. trachomatis iron acquisition (extensively reviewed by 62), and C. trachomatis exploits the host-derived iron-binding protein transferrin to deliver iron to its intracellular inclusion using secreted effectors 62.

Activation of trpBA transcription enables C. trachomatis to scavenge environmental indole and synthesize tryptophan, helping C. trachomatis evade the host's IFNγ response 85. A 2019 study by Pokorzynski et al. showed that trpBA expression also depends on iron via the YtgR regulator, suggesting a critical link between iron and tryptophan availability 97. When iron levels are low, YtgR cannot bind to the trpRBA intergenic region, allowing trpBA transcription and indole salvage. When iron is sufficient, YtgR represses trpBA transcription, thus halting tryptophan synthesis 97. YtgR also responds to tryptophan levels, creating a regulatory feedback loop that modulates trpBA expression in response to both iron and tryptophan availability. A unique WWW codon motif present in the proximal region of the promoter for coordinately regulated C. trachomatis genes detects tryptophan scarcity, fine-tuning YtgR activity even when indole is unavailable 98. This regulatory system is advantageous in the CVM environment, which is typically indole-rich but iron-poor. Although C. trachomatis’ iron-acquisition mechanisms remain unclear, YtgR is associated with the ytgABCD operon, specifically YtgCD permease 93, which likely plays a role. Further studies into C. trachomatis’ direct iron-acquisition mechanisms and genetic regulation could deepen our understanding of its pathogenesis.

C. trachomatis infection often co-occurs within a CVM rich in anaerobic, indole-producing microbes and characterized by low iron levels 97. In this environment, iron scarcity serves as a signal for C. trachomatis to upregulate tryptophan synthase, enabling efficient metabolism of indole—circumventing the host's IFNγ-driven immune response. This interplay between iron and tryptophan depletion reveals interconnected stress responses that appear to support C. trachomatis survival during host immune pressures.

To understand C. trachomatis survival, it is essential to consider both how C. trachomatis adapts to host-induced stress and how the CVM may impact either host or C. trachomatis responses. Lactobacillus species, often prevalent in a healthy CVM, have minimal iron requirements relative to other bacteria 99,100,101. This suggests that Lactobacillus species persist regardless of fluctuations in iron availability within the CVM. In contrast, anaerobes associated with bacterial vaginosis and C. trachomatis generally have higher iron requirements for growth. Host physiology influences iron availability in the lower genital tract, with iron levels naturally fluctuating throughout the menstrual cycle. These changes could impact C. trachomatis infection success at different cycle stages. An additional host-derived variable is anemia. Interestingly, dysbiotic CVMs—characterized by an overgrowth of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria--have been linked to iron deficiency in pregnant women 102. This association may seem counterintuitive, given that many bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria have high iron requirements. However, it is possible that these bacteria have evolved efficient iron-scavenging mechanisms that allow them to thrive even in iron-limited conditions, such as through siderophore production or the utilization of host-derived heme sources. Additionally, iron limitation may alter host immune responses or vaginal epithelial integrity in ways that favor dysbiosis. This paradox underscores the need for further human cohort studies to investigate the interplay between CVM composition, C. trachomatis incidence, and the specific metabolite landscape of both the CVM and the host. A deeper understanding of these dynamics could provide insights into how microbial communities persist and influence infection risk under varying iron availability.

In our recent study investigating CVM composition and chlamydial ascension risk, we identified Haemophilus haemolyticus as one of eleven CVM members that, in combination, were predictive of reduced likelihood of C. trachomatis reaching the endometrium 103. In the context of the human respiratory tract, H. haemolyticus is a protective commensal that outcompetes pathogenic non-typeable H. influenzae, because of its superior ability to sequester iron 104. If H. haemolyticus acts similarly in the context of CVM, it may constrain chlamydial replication, ultimately limiting ascension. Future studies on CVM should incorporate iron profiling to further elucidate this connection.

A study in Burkina Faso examined the impact of oral iron supplementation on lower genital tract infections and CVM composition 105. The researchers hypothesized that increased iron availability might heighten the risk of genital tract infections or dysbiosis. However, findings indicated that iron supplementation did not significantly elevate infection or dysbiosis risk. Notably, iron biomarkers in participants remained largely unchanged despite adherence to supplementation, suggesting limited iron absorption. This outcome implies that future studies would be useful to explore the relationship between iron supplementation and genital health, ideally in contexts where iron absorption is more effectively achieved 105.

Coinfection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Mycoplasma genitalium

C. trachomatis infection often coincides with co-infections involving other bacterial STIs or bacterial vaginosis. Like C. trachomatis, symptomatic Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections are associated with CST IV. 106. The dynamics between C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, especially regarding nutrient availability and immune responses, are complex. In an in vitro study, Onorini et al. observed that N. gonorrhoeae co-infection reduced the size and quantity of C. trachomatis serovar E inclusions in HeLa cells and decreased chlamydial progeny yield 107. Ball et al. similarly found that N. gonorrhoeae-C. trachomatis serovar D co-infection hindered chlamydial EB recovery but not overall replication, with inclusions resembling aberrant bodies 103. Interestingly, tryptophan or indole supplementation with Fe(NO₃)₃ did not restore normal chlamydial development, indicating N. gonorrhoeae may promote chlamydial persistence through pathways independent of iron or tryptophan availability 108. Furthermore, these findings were not replicated when Chlamydia muridarum, the mouse-adapted strain of chlamydia, or C. trachomatis serovar L2 were studied, which suggested that the persistence phenotype in response to coinfection might be strain-specific 108. C. muridarum is a natural respiratory pathogen for mice, which when inoculated into the female mouse vagina, leads to ascending genital tract infection and disease that is very similar to humans.

Beyond nutrient competition, differences in host immune modulation may benefit N. gonorrhoeae. For instance, co-incubation of C. trachomatis serovar L2 with neutrophils enhances N. gonorrhoeae growth 104. This is potentially because C. trachomatis secretes Chlamydial Protease Activity Factor (CPAF), which paralyzes neutrophils and reduces their oxidative responses, potentially shielding N. gonorrhoeae in co-infected environments 109. While N. gonorrhoeae may benefit from C. trachomatis’ suppression of neutrophil function, C. trachomatis may leverage N. gonorrhoeae’s ability to impair adaptive immunity through promoting death of antigen-presenting cells and limiting T-cell proliferation 110.

Few in vivo studies exist on C. trachomatis-N. gonorrhoeae co-infections. A C. muridarum/N. gonorrhoeae co-infection mouse model showed an increased vaginal N. gonorrhoeae burden but no additional upper genital tract involvement 111. Co-infected mice exhibited higher levels of N. gonorrhoeae despite elevated neutrophil numbers, possibly because chlamydial infection reduced the expression of antimicrobial peptides, including cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) and secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor (SLPI), that are effective against Gram-negative bacteria like N. gonorrhoeae 112. This suggests a potential role for these mediators in N. gonorrhoeae defense, which could be compromised by preexisting C. trachomatis infection 111.

Onorini et al. recently reported that N. gonorrhoeae enhancement in co-infection models requires active C. muridarum replication in the genital tract; mice that had cleared C. muridarum from the vagina but retained the bacteria in gut tissue showed no increase in vaginal N. gonorrhoeae abundance 113. Given that both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae express potent pro-inflammatory TLR2 ligands 39, neutrophil recruitment is likely proportional to the pathogen load at the infection site, with chlamydial CPAF synthesis contributing in situ to inhibition of neutrophil antimicrobial activity. However, a possible confounding factor in these studies is the difference between murine and human vaginal microbiomes 114,115,116,117 which limits the ability to identify human-relevant CVM members that might affect STI pathogenesis. Human studies are essential to better understand the metabolic dynamics in coinfections involving C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae.

Due to interspecies differences, murine models may not effectively identify CVM factors relevant to human infections and their spread. For example, bacterial vaginosis is strongly linked with CST IV microbiomes 12,15 and increases the risk for bacterial STI infections in the cervix 118,119. However, the CVM composition’s role in upper genital tract infection remains underexplored. A study by Russell et al., which included data from 225 women at risk for STI infections in the T cell Response Against Chlamydia (TRAC) cohort, found that N. gonorrhoeae co-infection significantly heightened the risk of C. trachomatis ascending to the upper genital tract 120. N. gonorrhoeae ¬ co-infection also increased the likelihood of new C. trachomatis infections over one year, possibly due to N. gonorrhoeae’s immunosuppressive effects, which compromise the generation of protective immune responses to C. trachomatis 120. This agrees with in vitro data that reveal extracellular vesicles released from N. gonorrhoeae compromise dendritic cell activation 121, and in vivo data generated in the N. gonorrhoeae mouse model that show infection induces immune inhibitory TGF-ß production and regulatory T cells that compromise generation of Th1 responses 122, which are important for host defense against both bacterial pathogens. Finally, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) are thought to facilitate C. trachomatis ascension 123,124, so N. gonorrhoeae’s promotion of PMN influx may indirectly contribute to C. trachomatis upward spread during co-infection. Together, these findings underline the complexity of C. trachomatis-N. gonorrhoeae interactions and underscore the need for human-specific studies to clarify how CVM composition and coinfection influence the pathogenesis of these STIs.

Mycoplasma genitalium is another STI pathogen frequently co-detected with C. trachomatis 125. Unlike C. trachomatis, which is intracellular, M. genitalium exists extracellularly but shares a dependence on the host for biosynthesis of amino acids, nucleic acids, and fatty acids 126. A secondary analysis of the TRAC cohort indicated that women with M. genitalium infection in the cervix or endometrium had an elevated risk of histologic endometritis, particularly among those with endometrial M. genitalium infection 127. Additionally, detection of C. trachomatis in the endometrium was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting M. genitalium 127. A study by Dirks et al. using 1,673 urogenital samples, mostly from women (n = 1,121, 67%), found no correlation between C. trachomatis and M. genitalium cervical load in coinfected individuals 128. However, these findings have not been explored within the context of the CVM, which could influence the interaction between these pathogens.

Inconsistent findings from in vitro, murine, and human clinical studies on coinfections may be partially due to the absence of in vivo CVM studies, differences in the CVM between humans and mice, and the critical role of the immune response in mediating susceptibility to coinfection. Further human studies that investigate iron availability, other metabolites, or bacterial profiles associated with "high-risk" or "protective" CVMs—as well as comparisons of immune responses in individuals with single versus co-infection—are essential to better understand how pathogen coinfection influences infection dynamics and disease outcomes among these "partners in crime" 39.

CVM compositions associated with C. trachomatis ascension

The composition of the CVM may also influence the risk of chlamydial infection spread, upper genital tract inflammation, and related immune pathology. C. trachomatis ascension to the uterus and Fallopian tubes is a prerequisite for development of PID 39. Cervical chlamydial load has been positively associated with an increased likelihood of infection ascension, as shown by both mathematical modeling 124 and the TRAC study which linked higher cervical C. trachomatis loads with increased risk of endometrial infection 120. Studies also correlate cervical C. trachomatis burden with an elevated risk of PID 129. CVM community members, particularly nutrient- or metabolite-producing microbes, may indirectly support chlamydial replication in the endocervical epithelium, thus increasing the likelihood of ascension. Additionally, the CVM may influence C. trachomatis ascension by modulating local inflammatory responses. For example, a diminished or delayed neutrophil influx could reduce immune-mediated clearance, allowing for prolonged infection. However, neutrophils have limited effectiveness in clearing C. trachomatis 109 and may even facilitate its spread 124,130,131.

In the cervix, C. trachomatis triggers production of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines involved in recruiting immune cells, including T cells and macrophages, to the site of infection 132,133,134. While this response is critical for bacterial clearance, excessive or prolonged inflammation can damage epithelial integrity, potentially enhancing pathogen dissemination to the upper genital tract. Our lab recently observed a positive correlation between CVM-derived amplicon sequence variants and levels of seven cytokines previously associated with C. trachomatis ascension 129, suggesting that local immune responses during infection are not solely driven by C. trachomatis abundance. These cytokines—CXCL10, TNF-α, IL-17A, CXCL9, CXCL11, CCL4, and CXCL13 100—play roles in immune cell recruitment and barrier function. Their elevated levels in the presence of certain CVM compositions suggest that the microbiome may shape the host’s inflammatory environment in ways that impact C. trachomatis pathogenesis.

In recent work analyzing TRAC cohort data via 16S rRNA sequencing, our lab examined if CVM composition predicts C. trachomatis ascension. Previously, N. gonorrhoeae co-infection, and high C. trachomatis burden has been associated with increased ascension 120. For some CSTs, we observed that it was possible to discriminate between participants with or without ascending C. trachomatis infection 103. CST IV correlated with ascension, highlighting an interaction between CVM composition and C. trachomatis infection severity. Although many CST IV microbes are indole producers, which generally aids C. trachomatis survival, some Prevotella species dominant in CST IV do not produce indole. This underscores the need to look beyond species identification and focus on metabolite production when analyzing CVM data. Our study also noted lower Sutterella spp. levels in endometrial-positive women. Since Sutterella spp. have been associated with heightened Th17 responses 135,136, the reduction of Sutterella spp. in endometrial-positive C. trachomatis cases might indicate decreased Th17 activity, impacting this potential mechanism of chlamydial host defense 137.

CVM compositions associated with duration of C. trachomatis infection

Natural, or “spontaneous,” clearance of C. trachomatis infection occurs in an estimated 11%-44% of cases 138. This phenomenon is defined as the resolution of infection between an initial C. trachomatis-positive test and a follow-up visit prior to antibiotic treatment, which can range from days to several weeks 139. Spontaneous clearance has been associated with lower tryptophan levels in the CVM, though it is unclear if this results from reduced indole-producing microbes or reflects elevated IFNγ levels associated with an effective adaptive immune response 138. Research also suggests that a Lactobacillus-dominated CVM may support spontaneous clearance; women with a predominance of Lactobacillus spp. were more likely to test negative for C. trachomatis at a follow-up appointment 140. Furthermore, women who naturally cleared C. trachomatis tended to have lower initial C. trachomatis burdens, and L. crispatus abundance was inversely correlated with C. trachomatis load, reinforcing the role of CVM composition in chlamydial clearance 76.

However, C. trachomatis infection can become chronic, lasting for a year or longer in up to 40% of women 141, which increases the risk of long-term sequelae. Chronic infection may be sustained by intermittent periods of non-replicating, aberrant C. trachomatis forms that reinitiate active replication when immune pressure decreases or when the CVM provides a nutrient-rich environment. As a result, CVM characteristics—such as high levels of indole-producing microbes—could indicate an elevated risk of chronic infection. Similarly, recurrent C. trachomatis infection can pose a challenge for some patients. A recent study of cohort 560 Black and Hispanic women found that those with both bacterial vaginosis and CST IV had an increased risk of C. trachomatis infection, and a higher likelihood of reinfection after treatment 142. In this CVM subgroup, which was linked to both acquisition and reinfection, the predominant species included Candidatus Lachnocurva vaginae, Prevotella, and Acinetobacter 142. Notably, Candidatus Lachnocurva vaginae showed the strongest association with C. trachomatis, but it was also highly correlated with ~nine other species, including Prevotella and Acinetobacter. The strong co-occurrence of these C. trachomatis-associated species within the same CVM suggests they CVM functions as a polymicrobial network that enhances the risk of both infection and reinfection. This underscores the need for future studies to consider polymicrobial interactions in chlamydial pathogenesis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CERVICOVAGINAL MICROBIOME RESEARCH

Study cohorts and techniques

Research on the CVM is rapidly advancing, and the field is constantly adapting and improving its methodologies. Sequencing techniques vary across studies, each presenting unique limitations and considerations. Currently, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is the most widely used approach in CVM composition research. Advances in 16S rRNA sequencing have enhanced the resolution and accuracy of microbiome identification, as reviewed recently 143. Qing et al. evaluated the range of methods employed in CVM research, specifically comparing different 16S rRNA sequencing techniques. Their study concluded that a sequencing pipeline targeting the V1-V3 variable region of the genome currently offers the most optimal and accurate taxonomic resolution of microbial communities relevant to CVM research 144. It is unrealistic to expect that CVM-derived 16S rRNA libraries will always reflect the presence of STI pathogen(s), so highly sensitive, clinical diagnostics should be used in determining infection status of study participants. Misclassification with respect to infection status and/or outcome 145 has potential to confound bioinformatic analyses.

Early CVM studies used less optimal sequencing techniques, and even the best 16S rRNA sequencing methods can offer only taxonomic information, often struggling to differentiate closely related species. Metagenomic approaches, which can identify microbial strains at the species level, provide additional specificity and improve accuracy in identifying CVM community members 146. Multiomic techniques such as transcriptomics 147, proteomics 148, and metabolomics 77,149 are also emerging, offering functional insights and more comprehensive information on population dynamics. For instance, Borgogna et al.’s investigation of the metabolomic profiles of 145 women, with and without C. trachomatis or M. genitalium coinfection, identified a distinct metabolome in infected women, marked by elevated LCFAs compared to healthy individuals 77. Additionally, many CVM bacterial species are fastidious or uncultivable, posing challenges for in vitro and in vivo studies aiming to create complex microbial communities that accurately mimic the human CVM. To address this, novel methods like culturomics have been developed to more accurately model this complex ecosystem 150. Culturomics is a technique that employs a diverse range of bacterial growth media and conditions to cultivate microorganisms that are typically difficult to grow under standard bacterial growth conditions 151,152. Furthermore, not all CVM members can be detected by 16S rRNA analysis, including bacteriophages and viruses. Despite their lack of representation in 16s rRNA microbiome studies, these microorganisms can significantly impact the microbiome. For example, bacteriophages have the potential to modulate bacterial communities while eukaryotic viruses can alter local host immune responses which, in turn, may influence CVM composition 153,154,155.

Designing clinical studies on the CVM requires careful consideration of cohort characteristics. Unlike the more stable gut microbiome, the CVM is highly dynamic, influenced by factors such as hormonal fluctuations, menstruation, sexual activity, hygiene, and contraceptive use 156. Due to these influences, longitudinal cohort studies are essential to capture CVM changes over time, rather than relying on one-time snapshots. This approach is particularly important for studying the CVM's role in STIs, as it allows comparisons of CVM composition before and after infection onset. Monitoring pre-existing immunity within cohorts can further reveal how immune responses interact with the CVM in the context of C. trachomatis acquisition and progression. However, longitudinal studies face challenges like participant retention, recruitment bias, and cost 157, though anticipated clinical trials for vaccines could provide valuable cohorts for such investigations.

Sample collection and preparation also impact study outcomes. Differences in storage solutions (e.g., GeneLock, RNAlater, SPG media) and sampling methods (e.g., self-swabs, vaginal sponges) can affect downstream analyses 158,159,160. Some collection methods may introduce contaminants—such as propylene glycol from lubricants, which can interfere with mass spectrometry 161,162. Additionally, certain vaginal lubricants contain antimicrobials, which may skew microbiome results. For immune studies, cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) is useful but highly susceptible to barium contamination. This is particularly relevant as recent research has shown that tampons can introduce trace metals, including barium, into samples, potentially impacting CVM studies 163. As CVM research advances, the development of standardized techniques and optimized models will be crucial for improving consistency and accuracy.

Clinical applications

A major goal of CVM research is to apply knowledge about the host-microbiome-pathogen relationship to reproductive health treatments. Inspired by the success of fecal microbiota transplants, vaginal microbiota transplants (VMTs) are being investigated 156. For instance, VMTs have shown promise in treating intractable bacterial vaginosis; a small study reported remission in 4 of 5 patients following VMT 164, and larger studies are ongoing 165. This approach may also hold potential for STI treatments, including C. trachomatis, by restoring protective Lactobacillus species in the CVM to promote eubiosis and potentially mitigate disease. However, achieving durable changes in the CVM microbiome is challenging, because even beneficial Lactobacillus species face competitive pressures from other resident bacteria 71, which complicates the development of long-term treatments.

CONCLUSION

We summarized studies examining how the CVM and co-pathogens affect the risk of C. trachomatis acquisition and infection spread in women (Figure 1). It is evident that the intricate interactions between the CVM, host immune responses, and pathogenic microorganisms - particularly C. trachomatis - drive clinical outcomes. These factors underscore the critical role of microbiome composition in reproductive health and disease. The CVM influences C. trachomatis pathogenesis both directly and indirectly. The contrasting influences of metabolites such as SCFAs and LCFAs in the gut and CVM, highlight the complexity of microbial and host dynamics. Additionally, the potential adaptations of C. trachomatis to nutrient and immune-mediated pressures reveal novel mechanisms that enable its survival and pathogenesis.

Emerging research methodologies, including multiomic analyses, are paving the way for deeper insights into these complex relationships. For example, a new multi-cell type microfluidic chamber called "vagina-on-a-chip" allows for controlled in vitro studies of CVM microbial effects on vaginal epithelial cells 166. Likewise, an in vivo mouse model that better replicates the human CVM would be invaluable for exploring CVM-pathogen-host interactions 167. Adding metabolomics data in studies could also improve our understanding of these complex relationships 33,77,149. However, challenges such as methodological variability, cohort differences, and limitations in current model systems underscore the need for standardized techniques and translational studies. Furthermore, the development of innovative clinical applications, such as vaginal microbiota transplants, offers promising avenues for improving outcomes in microbial dysbiosis and STIs.

Ultimately, advancing our understanding of the CVM's role in health and disease will require collaborative efforts that integrate microbiology, immunology, and reproductive health. Such efforts hold the potential to serve as a biomarker source for assessing STI risk and disease progression, and to drive development of more effective prevention and therapeutic strategies, improving health outcomes for individuals globally.

Our microbiome-focused studies are supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases via U19 AI084024 (Darville, PI) and R01AI170959 (O’Connell, PI). Emily Hand is funded in part by NIGMS T32 grant 5T32GM149370. Indriati Hood-Pishchany is funded in part through grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Awards No. INV-055566 and INV-072197).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Funding Statement

We wish to thank all the women have participated in our studies and the members of the clinical support team, under the direction of Harold Wiesenfeld MD and Sharon Hillier PhD, at the Allegheny County Health Department STD Clinic, the University of Pittsburgh, and Magee Womens Hospital Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA who facilitated this. We also thank Quintin Girardi (UNC) and Jake Roetcisoender (UNC) for their thoughtful feedback during manuscript preparation. Figure created with Biorender under license agreement number SX27RWAEZI.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kaur L, Gordon M, Baines PA, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Sinopoulou V, Akobeng AK. Probiotics for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3(3):CD005573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005573.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moayyedi P, Surette MG, Kim PT, Libertucci J, Wolfe M, Onischi C, Armstrong D, Marshall JK, Kassam Z, Reinisch W, Lee CH. Fecal microbiota transplantation induces remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis in a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2015;149(1):102–109. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ianiro G, Masucci L, Quaranta G, Simonelli C, Lopetuso LR, Sanguinetti M, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy plus vancomycin for the treatment of severe refractory Clostridium difficile infection-single versus multiple infusions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(2):152–159. doi: 10.1111/apt.14816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gupta V, Mastromarino P, Garg R. Effectiveness of prophylactic oral and/or vaginal probiotic supplementation in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;78(5):1154–1161. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Amabebe E, Anumba DOC. Female gut and genital tract microbiota-induced crosstalk and differential effects of short-chain fatty acids on immune sequelae. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2184. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hou K, Wu Z-X, Chen X-Y, Wang J-Q, Zhang D, Xiao C, Zhu D, Koya JB, Wei L, Li J, Chen Z-S. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano GAD, Gasbarrini A, Mele MC. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 2019;7(1):14. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Manor O, Dai CL, Kornilov SA, Smith B, Price ND, Lovejoy JC, Gibbons SM, Magis AT. Health and disease markers correlate with gut microbiome composition across thousands of people. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5206. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18871-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wiertsema SP, van Bergenhenegouwen J, Garssen J, Knippels LMJ. The interplay between the gut microbiome and the immune system in the context of infectious diseases throughout life and the role of nutrition in optimizing treatment strategies. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):886. doi: 10.3390/nu13030886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song Stephanie D, Acharya Kalpana D, Zhu Jade E, Deveney Christen M, Walther-Antonio Marina RS, Tetel Marc J, Chia N. Daily vaginal microbiota fluctuations associated with natural hormonal cycle, contraceptives, diet, and exercise. mSphere. 2020;5(4):e00593–e00520. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00593-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bakus C, Budge KL, Feigenblum N, Figueroa M, Francis AP. The impact of contraceptives on the vaginal microbiome in the non-pregnant state. Front Microbiomes. 2023;1:1055472. doi: 10.3389/frmbi.2022.1055472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;1(Suppl 1):4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.van Houdt R, Ma B, Bruisten SM, Speksnijder A, Ravel J, de Vries HJC. Lactobacillus iners-dominated vaginal microbiota is associated with increased susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Dutch women: a case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94(2):117–123. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Edwards VL, Smith SB, McComb EJ, Tamarelle J, Ma B, Humphrys MS, Gajer P, Gwilliam K, Schaefer AM, Lai SK, Terplan M, Mark KS, Brotman RM, Forney LJ, Bavoil PM, Ravel J. The cervicovaginal microbiota-host interaction modulates Chlamydia trachomatis infection. mBio. 2019;10(4):e01548–e01519. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01548-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(5):663–668. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, Yu KF, Andrews WW, Zhang J, Schwebke JR. Bacterial vaginosis assessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(12):1907–1915. doi: 10.1086/657320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tsai HW, Tsui KH, Chiu YC, Wang LC. Adverse effect of lactobacilli-depauperate cervicovaginal microbiota on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12495. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tabatabaei N, Eren AM, Barreiro LB, Yotova V, Dumaine A, Allard C, Fraser WD. Vaginal microbiome in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BJOG. 2019;126(3):349–358. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.France MT, Ma B, Gajer P, Brown S, Humphrys MS, Holm JB, Waetjen LE, Brotman RM, Ravel J. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00934-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bommana S, Hu Y-J, Kama M, Wang R, Kodimerla R, Jijakli K, Read Timothy D, Dean D. Unique microbial diversity, community composition, and networks among Pacific Islander endocervical and vaginal microbiomes with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Fiji. mBio. 2023;15(1):e03063–e03023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03063-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Freitas AC, Hill JE. Quantification, isolation and characterization of Bifidobacterium from the vaginal microbiomes of reproductive aged women. Anaerobe. 2017;47:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Amabebe E, Anumba DOC. The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of Lactobacilli. Front Med. 2018;5:181. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sakai M, Ishiyama A, Tabata M, Sasaki Y, Yoneda S, Shiozaki A, Saito S. Relationship between cervical mucus interleukin-8 concentrations and vaginal bacteria in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004;52(2):106–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Joo H-M, Hyun Y-J, Myoung K-S, Ahn Y-T, Lee J-H, Huh C-S, Han MJ, Kim D-H. Lactobacillus johnsonii HY7042 ameliorates Gardnerella vaginalis-induced vaginosis by killing Gardnerella vaginalis and inhibiting NF-κB activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(11):1758–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Al-Mushrif S, Eley A, Jones BM. Inhibition of chemotaxis by organic acids from anaerobes may prevent a purulent response in bacterial vaginosis. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49(11):1023–1030. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-11-1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donato KA, Gareau MG, Wang YJJ, Sherman PM. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG attenuates interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha-induced barrier dysfunction and pro-inflammatory signalling. Microbiol. 2010;156(Pt 11):3288–3297. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.040139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aldunate M, Srbinovski D, Hearps AC, Latham CF, Ramsland PA, Gugasyan R, Cone RA, Tachedjian G. Antimicrobial and immune modulatory effects of lactic acid and short chain fatty acids produced by vaginal microbiota associated with eubiosis and bacterial vaginosis. Front Physiol. 2015;6:164. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xie Z, He W, Gobbi A, Bertram HC, Nielsen DS. The effect of in vitro simulated colonic pH gradients on microbial activity and metabolite production using common prebiotics as substrates. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03235-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shin Y, Han S, Kwon J, Ju S, Choi TG, Kang I, Kim SS. Roles of short-chain fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Nutrients. 2023;15(20):4466. doi: 10.3390/nu15204466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang RX, Lee JS, Campbell EL, Colgan SP. Microbiota-derived butyrate dynamically regulates intestinal homeostasis through regulation of actin-associated protein synaptopodin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(21):11648–11657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917597117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schwecht I, Nazli A, Gill B, Kaushic C. Lactic acid enhances vaginal epithelial barrier integrity and ameliorates inflammatory effects of dysbiotic short chain fatty acids and HIV-1. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):20065. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47172-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yeoman CJ, Thomas SM, Miller ME, Ulanov AV, Torralba M, Lucas S, Gillis M, Cregger M, Gomez A, Ho M, Leigh SR, Stumpf R, Creedon DJ, Smith MA, Weisbaum JS, Nelson KE, Wilson BA, White BA. A multi-omic systems-based approach reveals metabolic markers of bacterial vaginosis and insight into the disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Parolin C, Foschi C, Laghi L, Zhu C, Banzola N, Gaspari V, D'Antuono A, Giordani B, Severgnini M, Consolandi C, Salvo M, Cevenini R, Vitali B, Marangoni A. Insights into vaginal bacterial communities and metabolic profiles of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: positioning between eubiosis and dysbiosis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:600. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, Kumwenda NI, Mtimavalye LA, Yang LP, Liomba GN, Broadhead RL, Chiphangwi JD, Miotti PG. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS. 1998;12(13):1699–1706. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199813000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mehta SD, Nandi D, Agingu W, Green SJ, Bhaumik DK, Bailey RC, Otieno F. Vaginal and penile microbiome associations with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in women and their male sex partners. J Infect Dis. 2022;226(4):644–654. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tamarelle J, Thiebaut ACM, de Barbeyrac B, Bebear C, Ravel J, Delarocque-Astagneau E. The vaginal microbiota and its association with human papillomavirus, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Di Pietro M, Filardo S, Simonelli I, Pasqualetti P, Sessa R. Cervicovaginal microbiota composition in Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9554. doi: 10.3390/ijms23179554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen H, Wang L, Zhao L, Luo L, Min S, Wen Y, Lei W, Shu M, Li Z. Alterations of vaginal microbiota in women with infertility and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:698840. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.698840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Darville T. Pelvic inflammatory disease due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis: immune evasion mechanisms and pathogenic disease pathways. J Infect Dis. 2021;224(12 Suppl 2):S39–S46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vasilevsky S, Greub G, Nardelli-Haefliger D, Baud D. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: understanding the roles of innate and adaptive immunity in vaccine research. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):346–370. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00105-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, Chico RM, Smolak A, Newman L, Gottlieb S, Thwin SS, Broutet N, Taylor MM. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(8):548–562P. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.228486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2022. 2022 Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/default.htm.[Accessed: 13.01.2025]. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pinto CN, Niles JK, Kaufman HW, Marlowe EM, Alagia DP, Chi G, Van Der Pol B. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(3):386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Farley TA, Cohen DA, Elkins W. Asymptomatic sexually transmitted diseases: the case for screening. Prev Med. 2003;36(4):502–509. doi: 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00058-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Paira DA, Olmedo JJ, Olivera C, Tissera AD, Molina RI, Rivero VE, Motrich RD, Saka HA. Chronic epididymitis due to Chlamydia trachomatis LGV-L2 in an HIV-negative heterosexual patient: a case report. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1129166. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cunningham KA, Beagley KW. Male genital tract chlamydial infection: implications for pathology and infertility. Biol Reprod. 2008;79(2):180–189. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.067835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.O'Connell CM, Ferone ME. Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Microbial Cell. 2016;3(9):390–403. doi: 10.15698/mic2016.09.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gitsels A, Sanders N, Vanrompay D. Chlamydial infection from outside to inside. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2329. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Elwell C, Mirrashidi K, Engel J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(6):385–400. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hybiske K, Stephens RS. Mechanisms of host cell exit by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(27):11430–11435. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6039.776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Aiyar A, Quayle AJ, Buckner LR, Sherchand SP, Chang TL, Zea AH, Martin DH, Belland RJ. Influence of the tryptophan-indole-IFNgamma axis on human genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: role of vaginal co-infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:72. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ouellette SP, Hatch TP, AbdelRahman YM, Rose LA, Belland RJ, Byrne GI. Global transcriptional upregulation in the absence of increased translation in Chlamydia during IFNgamma-mediated host cell tryptophan starvation. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62(5):1387–1401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1975.tb00568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Beatty WL, Byrne GI, Morrison RP. Morphologic and antigenic characterization of interferon gamma-mediated persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:3998–4002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Matsumoto A, Manire GP. Electron microscopic observations on the effects of penicillin on the morphology of Chlamydia psittaci. J Bacteriol. 1970;101:278. doi: 10.1128/jb.101.1.278-285.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Panzetta ME, Lujan AL, Bastidas RJ, Damiani MT, Valdivia RH, Saka HA. Ptr/CTL0175 is required for the efficient recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from stress induced by gamma-interferon. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:756. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rockey DD, Wang X, Debrine A, Grieshaber N, Grieshaber SS. Metabolic dormancy in Chlamydia trachomatis treated with different antibiotics. Infect Immun. 2024;92(2):e00339–e00323. doi: 10.1128/iai.00339-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Skilton RJ, Cutcliffen LT, Barlow D, Wang Y, Salim O, Lambden PR, Clarke IN. Penicillin induced persistence in Chlamydia trachomatis: high quality time lapse video analysis of the developmental cycle. PloS One. 2009;4(11):e7723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ziklo N, Huston WM, Taing K, Katouli M, Timms P. In vitro rescue of genital strains of Chlamydia trachomatis from interferon-gamma and tryptophan depletion with indole-positive, but not indole-negative Prevotella spp. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0903-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ziklo N, Vidgen ME, Taing K, Huston WM, Timms P. Dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiota and higher vaginal kynurenine/tryptophan ratio Reveals an association with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:1. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burian K, Endresz V, Deak J, Kormanyos Z, Pal A, Nelson D, Virok D. Transcriptome analysis indicates an enhanced activation of adaptive and innate immunity by chlamydia-infected murine epithelial cells treated with interferon γ. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(9):1405–1414. doi: 10.1086/656526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Byrne GI, Lehmann LK, Landry GJ. Induction of tryptophan catabolism is the mechanism for gamma interferon-mediated inhibition of intracellular Chlamydia psittaci replication in T24 cells. Infect Immun. 1986;53:347–351. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.2.347-351.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pokorzynski ND, Thompson CC, Carabeo RA. Ironing out the unconventional mechanisms of iron acquisition and gene regulation in Chlamydia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:394. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Raulston JE. Response of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E to iron restriction in vitro and evidence for iron-regulated chlamydial proteins. Infect Immun. 1997;65(11):4539–4547. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.11.4539-4547.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Igietseme JU. Molecular mechanism of T-cell control of Chlamydia in mice: role of nitric oxide in vivo. Immunol. 1996;88(1):1–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.d01-655.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen H, Min S, Wang L, Zhao L, Luo F, Lei W, Wen Y, Luo L, Zhou Q, Peng L, Li Z. Lactobacillus modulates Chlamydia infectivity and genital tract pathology in vitro and in vivo. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:877223. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.877223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gong Z, Luna Y, Yu P, Fan H. Lactobacilli inactivate Chlamydia trachomatis through lactic acid but not H2O2. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Delgado-Diaz DJ, Tyssen D, Hayward JA, Gugasyan R, Hearps AC, Tachedjian G. Distinct immune responses elicited from cervicovaginal epithelial cells by lactic acid and short chain fatty acids associated with optimal and non-optimal vaginal microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:446. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rose 2nd WA, McGowin CL, Spagnuolo RA, Eaves-Pyles TD, Popov VL, Pyles RB. Commensal bacteria modulate innate immune responses of vaginal epithelial cell multilayer cultures. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van der Veer C, Bruisten SM, van der Helm JJ, de Vries HJ, van Houdt R. The cervicovaginal microbiota in women notified for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a case-control study at the Sexually Transmitted Infection Outpatient Clinic in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(1):24–31. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nardini P, Ñahui Palomino RA, Parolin C, Laghi L, Foschi C, Cevenini R, Vitali B, Marangoni A. Lactobacillus crispatus inhibits the infectivity of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies, in vitro study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29024. doi: 10.1038/srep29024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.France MT, Mendes-Soares H, Forney LJ. Genomic comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners reveal potential ecological drivers of community composition in the vagina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(24):7063–7073. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02385-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Witkin SS, Mendes-Soares H, Linhares IM, Jayaram A, Ledger WJ, Forney LJ. Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. mBio. 2013;4(4):e00460–e00413. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00460-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tachedjian G, Aldunate M, Bradshaw CS, Cone RA. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol. 2017;168(9-10):782–792. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mitchell C, Fredricks D, Agnew K, Hitti J. Hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacilli are Associated with lower levels of vaginal interleukin-1beta, independent of bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(7):358–363. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Strus M, Brzychczy-Wloch M, Gosiewski T, Kochan P, Heczko PB. The in vitro effect of hydrogen peroxide on vaginal microbial communities. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2006;48(1):56–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ardizzone CM, Taylor CM, Toh E, Lillis RA, Elnaggar JH, Lammons JW, Mott PD, Duffy EL, Shen L, Quayle AJ. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis burden with the vaginal microbiota, bacterial vaginosis, and metronidazole treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1289449. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1289449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Borgogna JC, Shardell MD, Yeoman CJ, Ghanem KG, Kadriu H, Ulanov AV, Gaydos CA, Hardick J, Robinson CK, Bavoil PM, Ravel J, Brotman RM, Tuddenham S. The association of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium infection with the vaginal metabolome. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60179-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, Sakamoto J, Schütte UM, Zhong X, Koenig SS, Fu L, Ma ZS, Zhou X, Abdo Z, Forney LJ, Ravel J. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Trans Med. 2012;4(132):132ra152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G, González MJ, Quera R, Dijkstra G, Harmsen HJM, Faber KN, Hermoso MA. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, deRoos P, Liu H, Cross JR, Pfeffer K, Coffer PJ, Rudensky AY. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504(7480):451–455. doi: 10.1038/nature12726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CP, Macfarlane GT. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987;28(10):1221–1227. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.10.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chaudry AN, Travers PJ, Yuenger J, Colletta L, Evans P, Zenilman JM, Tummon A. Analysis of vaginal acetic acid in patients undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(11):5170–5175. doi: 10.1128/jcm.42.11.5170-5175.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mirmonsef P, Zariffard MR, Gilbert D, Makinde H, Landay AL, Spear GT. Short-chain fatty acids induce pro-inflammatory cytokine production alone and in combination with toll-like receptor ligands. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67(5):391–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01089.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sharma M, Recuero-Checa MA, Fan FY, Dean D. Chlamydia trachomatis regulates growth and development in response to host cell fatty acid availability in the absence of lipid droplets. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20(2) doi: 10.1111/cmi.12801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yao J, Dodson VJ, Frank MW, Rock CO. Chlamydia trachomatis scavenges host fatty acids for phospholipid synthesis via an acyl-acyl carrier protein synthetase. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(36):22163–22173. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.671008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhu M, Frank MW, Radka CD, Jeanfavre S, Tse MW, Pacheco JA, Pierce K, Deik A, Xu J, Hussain S, Hussain FA, Xulu N, Khan N, Pillay V, Dong KL, Ndung'u T, Clish CB, Rock CO, Blainey PC, Bloom SM, Kwon DS. Vaginal Lactobacillus fatty acid response mechanisms reveal a novel strategy for bacterial vaginosis treatment. 2023;bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.30.573720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Riffaud CM, Rucks EA, Ouellette SP. Tryptophan availability during persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis directly impacts expression of chlamydial cell division proteins. Infect Immun. 2023;91(2):e00513–e00522. doi: 10.1128/iai.00513-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Belland RJ, Nelson DE, Virok D, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Beatty WL, Caldwell HD. Transcriptome analysis of chlamydial growth during IFN-gamma-mediated persistence and reactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(26):15971–15976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2535394100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Xie G, Bonner CA, Jensen RA. Dynamic diversity of the tryptophan pathway in chlamydiae: reductive evolution and a novel operon for tryptophan recapture. Genome Biol. 2002;3(9):research0051. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-research0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Fehlner-Gardiner C, Roshick C, Carlson JH, Hughes S, Belland RJ, Caldwell HD, McClarty G. Molecular basis defining human Chlamydia trachomatis tissue tropism. A possible role for tryptophan synthase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(30):26893–26903. doi: 10.1159/000162822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ziklo N, Huston WM, Hocking JS, Timms P. Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infections: when host immune response and the microbiome collide. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(9):750–765. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Caldwell HD, Wood H, Crane D, Bailey R, Jones RB, Mabey D, Maclean I, Mohammed Z, Peeling R, Roshick C, Schachter J, Solomon AW, Stamm WE, Suchland RJ, Taylor L, West SK, Quinn TC, Belland RJ, McClarty G. Polymorphisms in Chlamydia trachomatis tryptophan synthase genes differentiate between genital and ocular isolates. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(11):1757–1769. doi: 10.1172/JCI17993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang L, Hou Y, Yuan H, Chen H. The role of tryptophan in Chlamydia trachomatis persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:931653. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.931653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nature Reviews Microbiol. 2012;10(8):525–537. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Brinkworth AJ, Wildung MR, Carabeo RA. Genomewide transcriptional responses of iron-starved Chlamydia trachomatis reveal prioritization of metabolic precursor synthesis over protein translation. mSystems. 2018;3(1):e00184–e00117. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00184-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pokorzynski ND, Alla MR, Carabeo RA. Host cell amplification of nutritional stress contributes to persistence in Chlamydia trachomatis. mBio. 2022;13(6):e0271922. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02719-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pokorzynski ND, Brinkworth AJ, Carabeo R. A bipartite iron-dependent transcriptional regulation of the tryptophan salvage pathway in Chlamydia trachomatis. Elife. 2019;8:e42295. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pokorzynski ND, Hatch ND, Ouellette SP, Carabeo RA. The iron-dependent repressor YtgR is a tryptophan-dependent attenuator of the trpRBA operon in Chlamydia trachomatis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6430. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20181-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Imbert M, Blondeau R. On the iron requirement of lactobacilli grown in chemically defined medium. Curr Microbiol. 1998;37(1):64–66. doi: 10.1007/s002849900339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Weinberg ED. The Lactobacillus anomaly: total iron abstinence. Perspect Biol Med. 1997;40(4):578–583. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1997.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Elli M, Zink R, Rytz A, Reniero R, Morelli L. Iron requirement of Lactobacillus spp. in completely chemically defined growth media. J Appl Microbiol. 2000;88(4):695–703. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Verstraelen H, Delanghe J, Roelens K, Blot S, Claeys G, Temmerman M. Subclinical iron deficiency is a strong predictor of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy. BMC Infect Dis. 2005;5:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jeong S, Tollison T, Brochu H, Chou H, Huntress I, Yount KS, Zheng X, Darville T, O’Connell CM, Peng X. Cervicovaginal microbial features predict Chlamydia trachomatis spread to the upper genital tract of infected women. bioRxiv. 2024 doi: 10.1101/2024.11.26.625070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fulte S, Atto B, McCarty A, Horn Kadi J, Redzic JS, Eisenmesser E, Yang M, Marsh RL, Tristram S, Clark SE. Heme sequestration by hemophilin from Haemophilus haemolyticus reduces respiratory tract colonization and infection with non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. mSphere. 2024;9(3):e00006–e00024. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00006-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Brabin L, Roberts SA, Gies S, Nelson A, Diallo S, Stewart CJ, Kazienga A, Birtles J, Ouedraogo S, Claeys Y, Tinto H, d’Alessandro U, Faragher EB, Brabin B. Effects of long-term weekly iron and folic acid supplementation on lower genital tract infection - a double blind, randomised controlled trial in Burkina Faso. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0967-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lovett A, Sena AC, Macintyre AN, Sempowski GD, Duncan JA, Waltmann A. Cervicovaginal microbiota predicts Neisseria gonorrhoeae clinical presentation. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:790531. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.790531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Onorini D, Borel N, Schoborg RV, Leonard CA. Neisseria gonorrhoeae limits Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion development and infectivity in a novel in vitro co-infection model. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:911818. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.911818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ball LM, Bronstein E, Liechti GW, Maurelli AT. Neisseria gonorrhoeae drives Chlamydia trachomatis into a persistence-like state during in vitro co-infection. Infect Immun. 2024;92(1):e0017923. doi: 10.1128/iai.00179-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rajeeve K, Das S, Prusty BK, Rudel T. Chlamydia trachomatis paralyses neutrophils to evade the host innate immune response. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(7):824–835. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0182-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zheng X, O'Connell CM, Zhong W, Nagarajan UM, Tripathy M, Lee D, Russell AN, Wiesenfeld H, Hillier S, Darville T. Discovery of blood transcriptional endotypes in women with pelvic inflammatory disease. J Immunol. 2018;200(8):2941–2956. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Vonck RA, Darville T, O'Connell CM, Jerse AE. Chlamydial infection increases gonococcal colonization in a novel murine coinfection model. Infect Immun. 2011;79(4):1566–1577. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01155-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kolls JK, McCray Jr PB, Chan YR. Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(11):829–835. doi: 10.1038/nri2433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Onorini D, Leonard CA, Phillips Campbell R, Prahauser B, Pesch T, Schoborg RV, Jerse AE, Tarigan B, Borel N. Neisseria gonorrhoeae coinfection during Chlamydia muridarum genital latency does not modulate murine vaginal bacterial shedding. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(3):e0450022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04500-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mejia ME, Ottinger S, Vrbanac A, Babu P, Zulk JJ, Moorshead D, Bode L, Nizet V, Patras KA. Human milk oligosaccharides reduce murine Group B streptococcus vaginal colonization with minimal impact on the vaginal microbiota. mSphere. 2022;7(1):e0088521. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00885-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Burcham Lindsey R, Burcham Zachary M, Akbari Madeline S, Metcalf Jessica L, Doran Kelly S. Interrelated effects of zinc deficiency and the microbiome on Group B streptococcal vaginal colonization. mSphere. 2022;7(4):e00264–e00222. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00264-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Vrbanac A, Riestra AM, Coady A, Knight R, Nizet V, Patras KA. The murine vaginal microbiota and its perturbation by the human pathogen group B streptococcus. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1341-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Hernández-Quiroz F, Murugesan S, Velazquez-Martínez C, Villalobos-Flores LE, Maya-Lucas O, Piña-Escobedo A, García-González I, Ocadiz-Delgado R, Lambert PF, Gariglio P, García-Mena J. The vaginal and fecal microbiota of a murine cervical carcinoma model under synergistic effect of 17β-Estradiol and E7 oncogene expression. Microb Pathog. 2021;152:104763. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gallo MF, Macaluso M, Warner L, Fleenor ME, Hook 3rd EW, Brill I, Weaver MA. Bacterial vaginosis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection among women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic: a longitudinal analysis of possible causal links. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(3):213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Nye MB, Harris AB, Pherson AJ, Cartwright CP. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection in women with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Women's Health. 2020;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00926-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Russell AN, Zheng X, O'Connell CM, Taylor BD, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Zhong W, Darville T. Analysis of factors driving incident and ascending infection and the role of serum antibody in Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(4):523–531. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhu W, Tomberg J, Knilans KJ, Anderson JE, McKinnon KP, Sempowski GD, Nicholas RA, Duncan JA. Properly folded and functional PorB from Neisseria gonorrhoeae inhibits dendritic cell stimulation of CD4(+) T cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(28):11218–11229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Liu Y, Islam EA, Jarvis GA, Gray-Owen SD, Russell MW. Neisseria gonorrhoeae selectively suppresses the development of Th1 and Th2 cells, and enhances Th17 cell responses, through TGF-beta-dependent mechanisms. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(3):320–331. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yudin MH, Hillier SL, Wiesenfeld HC, Krohn MA, Amortegui AA, Sweet RL. Vaginal polymorphonuclear leukocytes and bacterial vaginosis as markers for histologic endometritis among women without symptoms of pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):318–323. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Callan T, Woodcock S, Huston WM. Ascension of Chlamydia is moderated by uterine peristalsis and the neutrophil response to infection. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(9):e1009365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):418–426. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.McGowin CL, Totten PA. The unique microbiology and molecular pathogenesis of Mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_2):S382–s388. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Taylor BD, Zheng X, O'Connell CM, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Darville T. Risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium endometritis and incident infection: a secondary data analysis of the T cell Response Against Chlamydia (TRAC) Study. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94(6):414–420. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Dirks J, van Loo IHM, Dukers-Muijrers N, Wolffs PFG, Hoebe C. Chlamydia trachomatis coinfection does not influence Mycoplasma genitalium bacterial load in urogenital samples. Sex Transm Dis. 2023;50(3):157–160. doi: 10.1097/olq.0000000000001752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Geisler WM, Suchland RJ, Whittington WL, Stamm WE. Quantitative culture of Chlamydia trachomatis: relationship of inclusion-forming units produced in culture to clinical manifestations and acute inflammation in urogenital disease. J Infect Dis. 2001;184(10):1350–1354. doi: 10.1086/323998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Rank RG, Whittimore J, Bowlin AK, Dessus-Babus S, Wyrick PB. Chlamydiae and polymorphonuclear leukocytes: unlikely allies in the spread of chlamydial infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;54(1):104–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00459.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Barteneva N, Theodor I, Peterson EM, De La Maza LM. Role of neutrophils in controlling early stages of a Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infect Immun. 1996;64(11):4830–4833. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.11.4830-4833.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Rank RG, Lacy HM, Goodwin A, Sikes J, Whittimore J, Wyrick PB, Nagarajan UM. Host chemokine and cytokine response in the endocervix within the first developmental cycle of Chlamydia muridarum. Infect Immun. 2010;78(1):536–544. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00772-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Poston TB, Lee DE, Darville T, Zhong W, Dong L, O'Connell CM, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Sempowski GD, Zheng X. Cervical cytokines associated with Chlamydia trachomatis susceptibility and protection. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(2):330–339. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Pudney J, Quayle AJ, Anderson DJ. Immunological microenvironments in the human vagina and cervix: mediators of cellular immunity are concentrated in the cervical transformation zone. Biol Reprod. 2005;73(6):1253–1263. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.043133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Ando M, Kamada N, Nagano Y, Narushima S, Suda W, Imaoka A, Setoyama H, Nagamori T, Ishikawa E, Shima T, Hara T, Kado S, Jinnohara T, Ohno H, Kondo T, Toyooka K, Watanabe E, Yokoyama S, Tokoro S, Mori H, Noguchi Y, Morita H, II Ivanov, Sugiyama T, Nuñez G, Camp JG, Hattori M, Umesaki Y. Th17 cell induction by adhesion of microbes to intestinal epithelial cells. Cell. 2015;163(2):367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Rakotobe S, Lécuyer E, Mulder I, Lan A, Bridonneau C, Rochet V, Pisi A, De Paepe M, Brandi G, Eberl G, Snel J, Kelly D, Cerf-Bensussan N. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity. 2009;31(4):677–689. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yount KS, Kollipara A, Liu C, Zheng X, O'Connell CM, Bagwell B, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Darville T. Unique T cell signatures are associated with reduced Chlamydia trachomatis reinfection in a highly exposed cohort. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.08.02.551709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Jordan SJ, Olson KM, Barnes S, Wilson LS, Berryhill TF, Bakshi R, Brown LT, Press CG, Geisler WM. Lower levels of cervicovaginal tryptophan are associated with natural clearance of Chlamydia in women. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(12):1888–1892. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Geisler WM, Wang C, Morrison SG, Black CM, Bandea CI, Hook 3rd EW. The natural history of untreated Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the interval between screening and returning for treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(2):119–123. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318151497d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Mott PD, Taylor CM, Lillis RA, Ardizzone CM, Albritton HL, Luo M, Calabresi KG, Martin DH, Myers L, Quayle AJ. Differences in the genital microbiota in women who naturally clear Chlamydia trachomatis infection compared to women who do not clear; a pilot study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:615770. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.615770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Molano M, Meijer CJ, Weiderpass E, Arslan A, Posso H, Franceschi S, Ronderos M, Munoz N, van den Brule AJ. The natural course of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Colombian women: a 5-year follow-up study. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(6):907–916. doi: 10.1086/428287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Usyk M, Carlson L, Schlecht NF, Sollecito CC, Grassi E, Wiek F, Viswanathan S, Strickler HD, Nucci-Sack A, Diaz A, Burk RD. Cervicovaginal microbiome and natural history of Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents and young women. Cell. 2025;188(4):1051–1061.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Jin J, Liu X, Shiroguchi K. Long journey of 16S rRNA-amplicon sequencing toward cell-based functional bacterial microbiota characterization. iMetaOmics. 2024;1:e9. doi: 10.1002/imo2.9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Qing W, Shi Y, Chen R, Zou Y, Qi C, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Li S, Hou Y, Zhou H, Chen M. Species-level resolution for the vaginal microbiota with short amplicons. mSystems. 2024;9(2):e0103923. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01039-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Jeong S, Tollison T, Brochu H, Chou H, Yu T, Baghaie P, Yount KS, Darville T, Peng X, O'Connell CM. Aptima Combo2-avoiding variants detected in cervical and endometrial specimens from a cohort of sexually active cisgender women during 16S microbiome profiling. 2024;medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.13.24316066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Holm JB, France MT, Gajer P, Ma B, Brotman RM, Shardell M, Forney L, Ravel J. Integrating compositional and functional content to describe vaginal microbiomes in health and disease. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01692-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.France MT, Fu L, Rutt L, Yang H, Humphrys MS, Narina S, Gajer PM, Ma B, Forney LJ, Ravel J. Insight into the ecology of vaginal bacteria through integrative analyses of metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02635-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bonnardel F, Haslam SM, Dell A, Feizi T, Liu Y, Tajadura-Ortega V, Akune Y, Sykes L, Bennett PR, MacIntyre DA, Lisacek F, Imberty A. Proteome-wide prediction of bacterial carbohydrate-binding proteins as a tool for understanding commensal and pathogen colonisation of the vaginal microbiome. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00220-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Ceccarani C, Foschi C, Parolin C, D'Antuono A, Gaspari V, Consolandi C, Laghi L, Camboni T, Vitali B, Severgnini M, Marangoni A. Diversity of vaginal microbiome and metabolome during genital infections. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50410-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Abou Chacra L, Benatmane A, Iwaza R, Ly C, Alibar S, Armstrong N, Mediannikov O, Bretelle F, Fenollar F. Culturomics reveals a hidden world of vaginal microbiota with the isolation of 206 bacteria from a single vaginal sample. Arch Microbiol. 2023;206(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03742-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Diakite A, Dubourg G, Dione N, Afouda P, Bellali S, Ngom II, Valles C, Tall Ml, Lagier J-C, Raoult D. Optimization and standardization of the culturomics technique for human microbiome exploration. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66738-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Bilen M, Dufour J-C, Lagier J-C, Cadoret F, Daoud Z, Dubourg G, Raoult D. The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Madere FS, Monaco CL. The female reproductive tract virome: understanding the dynamic role of viruses in gynecological health and disease. Curr Opin Virol. 2022;52:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Jakobsen RR, Haahr T, Humaidan P, Jensen JS, Kot WP, Castro-Mejia JL, Deng L, Leser TD, Nielsen DS. Characterization of the vaginal DNA virome in health and dysbiosis. Viruses. 2020;12(10):1143. doi: 10.3390/v12101143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kaelin EA, Skidmore PT, Łaniewski P, Holland LA, Chase DM, Herbst-Kralovetz MM, Lim ES. Cervicovaginal DNA virome alterations are associated with genital inflammation and microbiota composition. mSystems. 2022;7(2):e0006422. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00064-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Tuniyazi M, Zhang N. Possible therapeutic mechanisms and future perspectives of vaginal microbiota transplantation. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1427. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Walker J, Fairley CK, Urban E, Chen MY, Bradshaw C, Walker SM, Donovan B, Tabrizi SN, McNamee K, Currie M, Pirotta M, Kaldor J, Gurrin LC, Birden H, Harindra V, Bowden FJ, Garland S, Gunn JM, Hocking JS. Maximising retention in a longitudinal study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis among young women in Australia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Bai G, Gajer P, Nandy M, Ma B, Yang H, Sakamoto J, Blanchard MH, Ravel J, Brotman RM. Comparison of storage conditions for human vaginal microbiome studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Kafka D, Gold RB. Food and Drug Administration approves vaginal sponge. Fam Plan Perspect. 1983;15(3):146–148. doi: 10.2307/2134741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Kumar T, Bryant M, Cantrell K, Song SJ, McDonald D, Tubb HM, Farmer S, Lewis A, Lukacz ES, Brubaker L, Knight R. Effects of variation in sample storage conditions and swab order on 16S vaginal microbiome analyses. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(1):e0371223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03712-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ahmadi S, Winter D. Identification of Poly(ethylene glycol) and Poly(ethylene glycol)-Based Detergents Using Peptide Search Engines. Anal Chem. 2018;90(11):6594–6600. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Laniewski P, Owen KA, Khnanisho M, Brotman RM, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Clinical and personal lubricants impact the growth of vaginal Lactobacillus species and colonization of vaginal epithelial cells: an in vitro study. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(1):63–70. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Shearston JA, Upson K, Gordon M, Do V, Balac O, Nguyen K, Yan B, Kioumourtzoglou M-A, Schilling K. Tampons as a source of exposure to metal(loid)s. Environ Int. 2024;190:108849. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Lev-Sagie A, Goldman-Wohl D, Cohen Y, Dori-Bachash M, Leshem A, Mor U, Strahilevitz J, Moses AE, Shapiro H, Yagel S, Elinav E. Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat Med. 2019;25(10):1500–1504. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0600-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kwon D. Vaginal microbiota transplant to promote Lactobacillus-dominant cervicovaginal communities. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04046900.[Accessed: 25.03.2025]. [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Mahajan G, Doherty E, To T, Sutherland A, Grant J, Junaid A, Gulati A, LoGrande N, Izadifar Z, Timilsina SS, Horváth V, Plebani R, France M, Hood-Pishchany I, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Kwon DS, Goyal G, Prantil-Baun R, Ravel J, Ingber DE. Vaginal microbiome-host interactions modeled in a human vagina-on-a-chip. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01400-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Ottinger S, Robertson CM, Branthoover H, Patras KA. The human vaginal microbiota: from clinical medicine to models to mechanisms. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2024;77:102422. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbial Cell are provided here courtesy of Shared Science Publishers

RESOURCES