Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2025 Apr 30;5(4):e0004577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004577

Effects of prenatal lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic exposure on children’s neurodevelopment in an artisanal small-scale gold mining area in Northwestern Tanzania using a multi-chemical exposure model

Elias C Nyanza 1,*, Raphael J Mhana 2, Moses Asori 3, Deborah SK Thomas 3, Agapiti P Kisoka 4
Editor: Muhammad Asaduzzaman5
PMCID: PMC12043129  PMID: 40305519

Abstract

An estimated 250 million children under five fail to reach their cognitive development potential in Africa. Growing evidence suggests reduced neurodevelopments for children from environmental exposures, yet research on this topic in Sub-Saharan Africa remains limited. This study examined the effects of multi-chemical prenatal exposure to heavy metals on developmental milestones for children aged 3–4 in artisanal and small gold mining areas in northwestern Tanzania. This longitudinal follow-up study of children whose mothers were enrolled in the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort in Geita District in 2015 were assessed at 3–4 years of age for the current study between June 2019 – June 2020. Developmental outcomes (cognitive, social, motor, and language skills) were assessed using the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT). A quantile g-computation model evaluated the linkage between multi-chemical exposures and developmental milestones. Of the 310 children in the follow-up, a majority had at least one form of developmental impairment (50.7%; n = 157) across four domains: gross motor (20.3%), fine motor (23.9%), language (28.3%), and social skill (16.2%). Increased Pb, Hg, Cd, and As exposure jointly reduced gross motor by 17.78% (aPR = 0.822; 95% CI: 0.6994, 0.966). Joint exposure to these heavy metals decreased language ability by 55.36% (aPR = 0.446; 95% CI: 0.313, 0.636) and decreased general developmental milestones by 13.36% (aPR = 0.866; 95% CI: 0.747,1.005). However, the combined effect on the fine motor (aPR = 0.943; 95% CI: 0.754, 1.180) and social skills 6.71% (aPR = 1.067; 95% CI: 0.694, 1.641) were not statistically significant. Exposure to heavy metals while in utero reduced children neurodevelopmental milestones at 3–4 years of age. The cumulative impact of Pb, Hg, Cd, and As was significant for gross motor, language ability, and general impairment. The independent effects of Pb and Hg were amplified beyond what would be expected under the additive assumption with Cd and As, suggesting synergistic effects.

1. Introduction

Exposure to chemicals contributes to an estimated 4.9 million deaths and 86 million disabilities globally every year, representing approximately 25% of the disease burden worldwide [1]. A 2007 study estimated that 200 million children under five in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia did not reach their full cognitive development potential, a figure which increased to about 250 million in 2017 [1,2]. From a life course perspective, developmental impairment in early childhood diminishes future educational and occupational opportunities and negatively impacts social and economic mobility [3,4]. By extension, cognitive decline across large swaths of the population restricts the potential for regional and national development [1,4,5].

Environmental exposure in utero and the early years of life increases the risk for physical- and mental health challenges later in adulthood [3,6]. Recent evidence reveals that even the previous generation’s exposure can have negative health consequences in later years [7,8]. Exposure to chemicals in utero and early childhood has been associated with neurocognitive and psychomotor developmental impairments in earlier and later childhood [710]; with an estimated 25% of early childhood developmental impairments attributed to environmental exposures [7]. In particular, the adverse health effects of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg) are well documented even at low doses in early fetal life [7,8,1113], although the burden is not as well studied in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Exposure to non-essential metallic elements is shaped by human activities, including artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), which is relatively common in most African countries [1416]. ASGM activities are a primary source of environmental pollution/contamination, particularly Hg as a result of gold amalgamation, and As, Pb, and Cd as constituents of most gold ore [15,17,18]. Studies conducted in ASGM areas in northwestern Tanzania revealed that soil, water sources, cassava leaves, and roots are contaminated with several chemical elements, including As, Hg, Pb, and Cd [15,19]. Human exposure to these heavy metals occurs through inhalation of polluted air, drinking contaminated water, and consuming food/crops prepared/grown in contaminated soil or irrigated with contaminated water [15,19].

Exposure to toxic chemical elements is cumulative and compounding [2022]. This may induce synergistic or intensifying health risks beyond an additive effect. For instance, even though Pb reduced the mental development index among children, the effect intensified with Hg and Cd [23]. A similar synergistic effect of Pb in the presence of Hg and polychlorinated biphenyls is reported between neurophysiological disorders and Pb exposure among children in Canada [24]. While chemical-specific studies linking one chemical to a health outcome have provided helpful information to inform regulatory policies, such studies fail to fully reveal the nature of multi-chemical exposures when individuals are exposed to multiple chemicals simultaneously or sequentially [25]. Improved models that more fully capture the simultaneity of heavy metals exposures can provide more robust evidence for policy.

Pregnant women in artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) areas are exposed to relatively high levels of chemicals [7,25,26]. Evidence indicates dose-related associations between exposure to toxic chemical elements and developmental delays in children [7,8,13,27]. However, there is some inconsistency in findings, with some studies reporting no association between prenatal exposure and early child developmental impairment [28,29], while others find significant associations [30,31]. Some of the variability could be due to interaction and compounding effects.

The current study examined the effects of multi-chemical prenatal exposure on neurodevelopmental milestones for children aged 3–4 years born to mothers in the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort in ASGM areas in northwestern Tanzania. The hypothesis is that Pb, Hg, As, and Cd will have synergistic or intensifying impacts on neurodevelopmental ability under joint exposure.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethics statement

The joint Catholic University of Health and Allied Science and the Bugando Medical Center Ethics and Research Review Committee reviewed and approved the study protocol (CREC/038/2014, CREC/379/2019, and CREC/699/2023). Permission to conduct the research was obtained from Geita Regional and District Council local authorities. Written informed consent was obtained from mothers who participated in the study. For children below 5 years participation, individual mothers signed a special assent form permitting the assessment of their children neurodevelopmental status. Individual mothers had an opportunity to read and listen to the purpose, benefits, and risks of the research along with the rights of the participants before being asked for consent (See S1 Checklist). Individual children who were sick during the assessment were directed to seek medication at a nearby health facility and hence were excluded from the study. Mothers had an opportunity to know the developmental state of their children and benefited from the comprehensive counseling on early stimulation as a way to mitigate the impact of developmental delays.

2.2. Study design, study setting, and study population

This is a longitudinal follow-up study as part of the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort in Geita District in northwestern Tanzania established in 2015 in ASGM areas. The details of this cohort have been explained elsewhere [26,32]; also see S2 Checklist. Briefly, the cohort included 883 pregnant women who were followed through to document the pregnancy outcomes. All children aged 3–4 years whose mother’s chemical element levels were part of the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort and still residing in the study area were recruited into the current study undertaken from 30th June 2019–25th May 2020. Mothers and their children in the cohort were excluded if they moved out of the ASGM area for over six months. A total of 352 mother-child pairs were recruited in this follow-up study, of which 310 were eligible, consented, and participated (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Recruitment, exclusion, and eligibility, and loss to follow-up of mothers and children in ASGM areas.

Fig 1

2.3. Data collection and statistical analysis

Parental data on socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the caregivers (e.g., occupation, economic status, age, marital status, parity) and demographic characteristics of the child (e.g., sex, age, number of siblings in a family) were collected using a face-to-face structured interview questionnaire carried out at their homes. The economic status (SES) of the family was determined using a socioeconomic wealth quintile based on traditional indicators of wealth possession at the household level as detailed elsewhere [26,32], similar to those used in Tanzanian Demographic and Health Surveys [33]. Households that scored ≥9 on the SES assessment were classified as high-SES families; those that scored 6–9 were considered moderate SES families, while those <6 were considered low-SES families [25]. As co-variates in the regression analysis, children characteristics, including age, sex, parental education, and family socio-economic status, were descriptively analyzed. A forward-backward step-wise regression analysis was conducted to exclude all covariates that did not improve model performance according to the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Deviance using Stata version 14.1 [Stata Corp LP®, College Station, Texas, USA) (See S1 and S2 Tables).

Data on mothers chemical element levels were utilized from the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort [26,32] (See S1 Data). Chemical levels were estimated using dried blood spots (DBS) for Hg, Cd, and Pb and urine samples for As [25,31,33,34]. Spot urine samples were collected in acid-washed polyethylene containers preserved with 1% hydrochloric acid and stored below -8oC before shipment to the laboratory. This was to prevent bacteria growth and absorption of the analytes. A drop of capillary blood was collected on filter paper following a simple finger prick for Cd, Pb, and Hg. Field and laboratory blanks (i.e., blank Whatman #903 filter papers) were included in sampling and analytical procedures to account for possible contamination and to avoid exposure misclassification. The DBS and urine samples underwent microwave-assisted closed vessel acid digestion to extract chemical element analytes from DBS and urine at 170oC for 30 minutes. These analytes were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) (µg/L) at an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory (ALS Scandinavia, Sweden). Apart from prenatal exposure levels, postnatal exposure among the children enrolled in this study was not considered.

Children’s neurodevelopmental milestones were assessed using the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT), which has been developed and validated in low-income countries and is an appropriate tool for assessing children aged between 0–6 years [35]. The MDAT has been translated into Swahili the common language in Tanzania, validated in our local settings – and used in the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort [8]. The MDAT contains 136 items, with 34 items across four domains (gross motor, fine motor, language, and social). The neurodevelopmental assessment was conducted by trained public health nurses blinded to the children’s prenatal exposure concentrations and [8] was determined based on the total score (ranging from 0 to 34 for each domain) [7]. Children who performed ≥ 90th percentile on all of the items in that domain or < 90th percentile on one or two items in that domain were classified as usual [35]. Those who performed < 90th percentile on more than two items in a domain were classified as impaired. In addition, individual children were classified in terms of global neurodevelopment status. In contrast, those who scored normal outcomes on all domains were classified as typically developing, and those impaired on at least one domain were classified as impaired for neurodevelopmental outcomes [7]. In the present study, the median motor scores were 11 (IQR = 9–13), of which the minimum was 4 and the maximum was 15, while the alpha coefficient for the items was 0.89. The median language scores were 7 (IQR = 6–7), with a minimum score of 4 and a maximum of 20, while the alpha coefficient for the items was 0.91. The median social functioning score was 10 (IQR = 8–11), of which the minimum was 5, and the maximum was 19, with an alpha coefficient of 0.94. In all domains, the alpha coefficient suggests good internal consistency.

Assessing the joint effects of multiple toxic chemical exposures on childrendevelopmental milestones is challenging with traditional regression models because: 1) they are unable to account for internal correlation/multicollinearity between chemical elements, and 2) they are unable to optimize each chemical weight or contribution on the overall joint effect. As a result, we used the quantile g-computation approach. Even though weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression has been used to make causal inferences for multi-chemical exposures on health outcomes, forcing chemical weights to have unidirectional effects (positive direction) in the WQS has been critiqued for introducing bias and inconsistency in model parameters. Therefore, proposed a more flexible and robust g-computation approach to address previously identified challenges in joint exposure modelling with the WQS model has been recommended [36]. For the dose-response relationship of joint exposure using quantile g-computation, parameters are estimated as:

Yi=β0+ψj=1dwjXjiq+εi=β0+ψj=1dβjXjiq+εi(1)

Where: Xjiq is the quantized version of exposure Xj, ψ is the weight given as j=1dβj (where βj is the effect size of exposure j).

The sum of all weights ψ=1; therefore, the individual weight for each heavy metal is given as:

wk=βkjdβj(2)

Where: wk is the weight for each chemical element, whereby weights can take on negative or positive directions based on the dose-response pattern between the health outcome and the exposure under consideration. Since our dependent variable was binary for each of the development components, we estimated the model Pr(Y=1|Xd) with logistic regression and then converted to log (RR) (calculated automatically by the g-comp package in RStudio).

Three separate models were built: (1) the multi-chemical model, where all the chemicals were entered but unadjusted for confounding; (2) the multi-chemical model, where all the chemicals were entered and adjusted for confounding; and (3) a chemical-specific model; where one chemical was entered at a time and adjusted for confounding effect. An anti-logarithm of the log (RR) was used to convert it to a prevalence ratio (PR) for straightforward interpretation. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around point estimates with 1000 bootstrap resampling iterations with Monte-Carlo simulations to address uncertainties introduced from the sample size effect. Relationships were significant at a 5% level. All modelling exercises were conducted with the qcomp package in RStudio version 4.3.2 [37].

3. Results

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of parents and children. The median age of mothers was 25 (IQR = 20–30), and 69.7% were between 20 and 34 years. Most mothers (80.3%; n = 249) had at least a primary school education. Based on asset ownership assessment, 91% (n = 282) had moderate and high SES. Most of the mothers (n = 244; 78.7%) were either farming or keeping animals and only nine mothers (2.9%) were in mining. Among fathers, more than a quarter (n = 144; 46.5%), were working in mining. The average age of children was 3.7 (SD = 0.3) years and more than half, 225 (51.4%) were females.

Table 1. Parental Socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics.

Parental Baseline characteristics N (%)
Maternal median age years (25, IQR: 20–30)
Maternal age group*
 14-24 107 (34.5)
 25-34 148 (47.7)
 35+ 55 (17.7)
Mother education
 No formal 61 (19.7)
 At least primary school 249 (80.3)
Social Economic Wealth Quintile (SEWQ)
 Good or High (>9) 211 (68.1)
 Moderate (6–9) 64 (20.6)
 Low (<6) 35 (11.3)
Mother’s occupation
 Farm/Animal keeping 244 (78.7)
 Mining 9 (2.9)
 Business and public servant 57 (18.4)
Father occupation
 Farm/Animal keeping 98 (31.6)
 Mining 144 (46.5)
 Business & Public Servant 68 (21.9)
Marital Status
 Married 285 (91.9)
 Single 5 (1.6)
 Separated 19 (6.1)
 Widow 1 (0.3)
Relationship with partner
 Good and supportive 284 (91.6)
 Poor (single-parent care) 23 (7.4)
 Separated (child with grandparent) 3 (1)
Individual Children Characteristic
 Mean age of children (43.9 ± 3.4) months
Sex of child
 Male 163 (52.7)
 Female 147 (47.3)
Presence of under-fives at home
 Yes 346 (78.8)
 No 93 (21.2)

Table 2 summarizes maternal prenatal chemical element levels from the initial study of the Tanzania Mining and Health Cohort in the current study. The total median urinary As level was 8.3 (IQR = 4.5-14.9) µg/L; more than three-thirds (n = 234; 75.4%) of mothers had less than 15µg/L of urinary As (Table 3). The median total level of blood Hg was 1.2 µg/L (IQR = 0.8-1.9) among mothers, and the majority (n = 237; 76.5%) had higher than ≥0.8 µg/L. The median prenatal Cd levels were 0.20 (IQR = 0.2-0.3) µg/L, with the majority (n = 261; 84.3%) of mothers having Cd levels <0.30 µg/L. Mothers’ median prenatal blood Pb levels were 27.2 µg/L (IQR = 17.2-42.5). Over one-third of children were prenatally exposed to Pb levels above 35 µg/L.

Table 2. Maternal prenatal blood total mercury (Hg), blood total cadmium (Cd), blood total lead (Pb), and total urinary arsenic (As) (N = 310).

Prenatal exposure levels N (%) P10 P25 Median (95%CI) P75 P95 Max
Total As (µg/L) 2.8 4.5 8.3 (7.4–9.3) 14.9 38.2 213
 ≥ 15 76 (24.6)
 <15 234 (75.4)
Total Mercury (µg/L) 0.6 0.8 1.2 (1.1–1.3) 1.7 3.8 72
 ≥0.8 237 (76.5)
 <0.8 73 (23.4)
Total Cadmium (µg/L) 0.14 0.21 0.2 (0.2–0.21) 0.3 0.5 1.5
 ≥0.3 49 (15.7)
 <0.3 261 (84.3)
Total Lead (µg/L) 11.6 17.2 27.2 (25–30.3) 42.5 85.8 145.1
 <35 194 (62.6)
 ≥35 116 (37.4)

Note: We dichotomized Pb, Hg, Cd, and As based on human biomonitoring reference values established by the GerESIV of 35.0 µg/L, 0.80 µg/L, 0.30 µg/L for blood lead, mercury, and cadmium, and 15 µg/L for urinary arsenic (Schulz et al. 2009). CI, confidence interval; ug/l, P, percentile; ug/l, microgram/liter.

Table 3. Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted model on chemical elements mixture effects on neurodevelopmental abilities.

Unadjusted Model
General Impairment
cPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Social Behavior
cPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Language Ability
cPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Gross Motor
cPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Fine Motor
cPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Intercept 0.646 (0.522, 0.800) 0.118 (0.0542, 0.2571) 0.504 (0.352, −0.324) 0.644 (0.519, 0.799) 0.4454 (0.3137, 0.6325)
psi1 0.8811 (0.759, 1.023)Ϯ 1.149 (0.728, 1.815) 0.418 (0.302, 0.579)*** 0.811 (0.6843, 0.961)* 0.943 (0.7540, 1.1801)
Cd + As 1.172 1.642 (Cd + Pb + As) 0.307 (Pb + Hg + Cd) 0.612 (Pb + Hg + As) 0.763 (Pb + Hg + As)
Pb + Hg 0.645 0.717 (Mercury) 1.009 (Arsenic) 1.074 (Cd) 1.188 (Cd)
Pb weight 0.686 (−) 0.350 (+) 0.632 (−) 0.658 (−) 0.509 (−)
As weight 0.275 (−) 0.027 (+) 1 (+) 0.330 (−) 0.0321 (−)
Cd weight 0.725 (+) 0.623 (+) 0.143 (−) 0.012 (−) 1 (+)
Hg weight 0.314 (−) 1 (−) 0.225 (−) 1 (+) 0.459 (−)
Covariate Adjusted Model
General Impairment
aPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Social Behavior
aPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Language Ability
aPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Gross Motor
aPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
Fine Motor
aPR (95% Lower CI, Upper CI)
(Intercept) 0.659 (0.545, −0.225) 0.132 (0.0635,0.2752) 0.463 (0.313, 0.684) 0.633 (0.512, 0.784) 0.459 (0.329, 0.640)
psi1 0.866 (0.747,1.01)* 1.067 (0.694, 1.641) 0.446 (0.313, 0.636)*** 0.822 (0.699, 0.966)* 0.923 (0.739, 1.153)
Pb + As + Hg 0.632 1.586 (Pb + Cd) 0.3296 (all) 0.600 0.735
Cd 1.125 0.682 (Hg + As) --------- 1.095 1.182
Pb weight 0.593 (−) 0.395 (+) 0.610 (−) 0.499 (−) 0.459 (−)
As weight 0.036 (−) 0.002 (−) 0.036 (−) 0.142 (−) 0.118 (−)
Cd weight 1 (+) 0.605 (+) 0.131 (−) 1 (+) 1 (+)
Hg weights 0.371 (−) 0.998 (−) 0.223 (−) 0.359 (−) 0.423 (−)

Note:

Ϯ

 = significant at 0.1;

*

 = significant at 0.05;

**

 = significant at 0.001;

***

 = significant at 0.0001; psi1 = combined effects of all chemical mixers; neg = negative weight; pos = positive weight; CI = confidence interval; aPR = adjusted prevalence ratio; cPR = crude Prevalence ratio.

The prevalence of neurodevelopmental impairment among the study participants was above 15% across all domains. Specifically, 20.3%, 23.9%, 28.3, and 16.2% of the participating children were impaired in their neurodevelopmental status for gross motor, fine motor, language ability, and social interaction ability, respectively. Additionally, for global neurodevelopmental status, slightly above half (50.6%) of the participating children were impaired in at least one of the neurodevelopmental domains.

The association between multi-chemical exposures and the five domains of cognitive developmental outcomes (fine motor, gross motor, social functioning, language ability, and general neurodevelopmental impairment) are reviewed in the following sections. Figs 211 below show the joint exposure effects for the five domains.

Fig 2. Effects of individual chemical elements and their weights on neurodevelopmental impairments in mixed interaction models for (a) Global Neurodevelopmental status. The bar plots pointing to the right represent chemicals that contributed positively (increased risk) to the joint exposure risk. In contrast, those pointing to the left indicate chemicals inversely contributing to the joint exposure risk.

Fig 2

Fig 11. l of the model uncertainty band for (e) Socio-interactions.

Fig 11

The y-axis indicates the probability of not being cognitively impaired, while 4 the x-axis shows the quantile distribution of the joint exposures. The MSM fit is an estimate 5 from the marginal structural model.

Fig 3. Effects of individual chemical elements and their weights on neurodevelopmental impairments in mixed interaction models for (b) Gross Motor.

Fig 3

The bar plots pointing to the right represent chemicals that contributed positively (increased risk) to the joint exposure risk. In contrast, those pointing to the left indicate chemicals inversely contributing to the joint exposure risk.

Fig 4. Effects of individual chemical elements and their weights on neurodevelopmental impairments in mixed interaction models for (c). Fine Motor.

Fig 4

The bar plots pointing to the right represent chemicals that contributed positively (increased risk) to the joint exposure risk. In contrast, those pointing to the left indicate chemicals inversely contributing to the joint exposure risk.

Fig 5. Effects of individual chemical elements and their weights on neurodevelopmental impairments in mixed interaction models for (d) Language Ability.

Fig 5

The bar plots pointing to the right represent chemicals that contributed positively (increased risk) to the joint exposure risk. In contrast, those pointing to the left indicate chemicals inversely contributing to the joint exposure risk.

Fig 6. Effects of individual chemical elements and their weights on neurodevelopmental impairments in mixed interaction models for (e) Socio-interactions.

Fig 6

The bar plots pointing to the right represent chemicals that contributed positively (increased risk) to the joint exposure risk. In contrast, those pointing to the left indicate chemicals inversely contributing to the joint exposure risk.

Fig 7. l of the model uncertainty band for (a) Global Neurodevelopmental status.

Fig 7

The y-axis indicates the probability of not being cognitively impaired, while 4 the x-axis shows the quantile distribution of the joint exposures. The MSM fit is an estimate 5 from the marginal structural model.

Fig 8. l of the model uncertainty band for (b) Gross Motor.

Fig 8

The y-axis indicates the probability of not being cognitively impaired, while 4 the x-axis shows the quantile distribution of the joint exposures. The MSM fit is an estimate 5 from the marginal structural model.

Fig 9. l of the model uncertainty band for (c) Fine Motor.

Fig 9

The y-axis indicates the probability of not being cognitively impaired, while 4 the x-axis shows the quantile distribution of the joint exposures. The MSM fit is an estimate 5 from the marginal structural model.

Fig 10. l of the model uncertainty band for (d) Language Ability.

Fig 10

The y-axis indicates the probability of not being cognitively impaired, while 4 the x-axis shows the quantile distribution of the joint exposures. The MSM fit is an estimate 5 from the marginal structural model.

One quantile increases in the Pb, Hg, Cd, and As joint exposure reduced the global neurodevelopmental performance by 13.34% (aPR = 0.866; 95% CI: 0.747,1.005; p = 0.047) (Table 3). In a chemical-specific model, Pb reduced global neurodevelopmental performance by 10.5% (aPR = 0.895, 95% CI: 0.810- 0.989; p = 0.030). However, in a mixed-effect model, the Pb level significantly decreased global neurodevelopmental performance by 23.8% (aPR = 0.762; p = 0.02) (Table 4).

Table 4. Marginal effects of individual chemicals and associated covariates on neurodevelopmental abilities.

Prenatal Exposure Characteristics General Impairment Social
Interactions
Language
Ability
Gross
Motor
Fine
Motor
aPR aPR aPR aPR aPR
(Intercept) 0.584 0.008 0.145 1.584 0.507
Pb 0.762* 1.1998 0.509*** 0.775* 0.868
As 0.984 0.999 0.961 0.930 0.964
Cd 1.125 1.322 0.866 1.095 1.182
Hg 0.844 0.683 0.781Ϯ 0.833Ϯ 0.878
Sex
 Boys Ref
 Girls 0.607* 0.716 0.927 0.737Ϯ 0.868
Birth Weight 0.819 1.122 0.903 0.627 0.993
Maternal Education
 No education Ref
 Primary school 0.807 1.196 0.837 0.730 0.605
 Ordinary level 0.308** 0.426 0.158Ϯ 0.202** 0.461
 Tertiary 0.736 4.438E-07 1.68E-06 0.863 0.829
Child age 1.061 ** 1.067 1.052 1.054 * 1.030
SES status
 High Ref
 Moderate 0.799 0.985 1.711 0.878 0.735
 Low 0.495Ϯ 0.418 1.345 0.565 0.373*

Note:

Ϯ

 = significant at 0.10;

*

 = significant at 0.05;

**

 = significant at 0.001;

***

 = significant at 0.0001

In the chemical-specific model, Hg reduced global neurodevelopmental performance by 7% (aPR = 0.930, 95% CI: 0.853-1.014; p = 0.10) (Table 5), whereas in a mixed-model, Hg (aPR = 0.8446) decreased it by 15.6. Furthermore, compared to boys, girls had a 39.3% (aPR = 0.607; p = 0.040) decline in global neurodevelopmental performance. Also, a unit change in age was statistically significantly associated with a 6.1% increase in global neurodevelopmental performance (aPR = 1.061; p = 0.015). The mother’s level of education had no protective effect, even though, compared to those without formal education, those with ordinary education levels (aPR = 0.308; p = 0.017) had a nearly 71% decline in global neurodevelopmental performance.

Table 5. Individual effects from the covariate-adjusted univariate model on neurodevelopmental abilities.

General Impairment Social Language Gross Motor Fine Motor
aPR aPR aPR aPR aPR
Pb 0.895** 1.183 0.561*** 0.885* 0.973
As 0.981* 1.0096 0.916 0.952 0.964
Cd 1.014 1.219 0.777* 1.000 1.066
Hg 0.930Ϯ 0.784 0.459Ϯ 0.912Ϯ 0.935

Note:

Ϯ

 = significant at 0.10;

*

 = significant at 0.05;

**

 = significant at 0.001;

***

 = significant at 0.0001

Pb, Hg, Cd, and As jointly reduced gross motor ability by 17.8% (aPR = 0.822; 95% CI: 0.699, 0.966; p = 0.041) (Table 3). In a chemical-specific model, Pb reduced gross motor ability by 11.5% (aPR = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.793- 0.988; p = 0.030), while in a mixed model, Pb decreased gross motor by 22.5% (aPR = 0.7752, p = 0.028) (Table 4). Similarly, Hg reduced gross motor ability by 8.8% in a chemical-specific model (aPR = 0.912, 95% CI: 0.824- 1.010; p = 0.078) (Table 5), and 16.8% (aPR = 0.832; p = 0.094) in the mixed model. As reduced gross motor ability by 4.8% (aPR = 0.952, 95% CI: 0.858-1.056; p = 0.354) in single-element exposure, while in the mixed model, it reduced gross motor ability by 7% (aPR = 0.930; p = 0.518). Additionally, children born to parents with ordinary education levels decreased their gross motor performance by 79.83% (aPR = 0.201; p = 0.002). Furthermore, age was statistically significantly related to gross motor ability (aPR = 1.054; p = 0.035).

Although not statistically significant, Pb, Hg, and As levels jointly negatively affected fine motor performance (aPR = 0.763), while Cd produced a positive effect (aPR = 1.188) (Table 3). Even though no association was found, Pb still made the most significant contribution as a risk factor (45.9%), followed by Hg (42.3%) and As (11.8%). Children from low SES backgrounds had a 62.7% decrease in fine motor performance compared to higher SES (aPR = 0.373; p = 0.015) (Table 4).

The combined effects of all the chemical elements decreased language ability by 55.4% (aPR = 0.446; 95% CI: 0.313, 0.636; p < 0.001) (Table 3). In a chemical-specific model, Pb reduced language ability by 43.9% (aPR = 0.561, 95% CI: 0.434-0.726; p < 0.001) while in a mixed model, it decreased language ability by 49.1% (aPR = 0.509; p < 0.0001) (Table 4). Furthermore, individually, Hg reduced language ability by 22.8% (aPR = 0.772, 95% CI: 0.621-0.959; p = 0.019) (Table 5), while in the mixed model, Hg decreased language ability by 21.9% (aPR = 0.781; p = 0.084). Cd (aPR = 0.777, 95% CI: 0.620- 0.973; p = 0.028) significantly reduced language ability by 22.3%, but the association was insignificant in a mixed model (Cd: aPR = 0.865; p = 0.344). Additionally, sex (aPR = 0.926; p = 0.810), mother’s primary school education level (aPR = 0.837; p = 0.645), the child’s age (aPR = 1.0519; p = 0.185), moderate SES (aPR = 1.711; p = 0.141), and low SES (aPR = 1.345; p = 0.520) were not statistically significantly related to language ability.

Although not statistically significant, the joint effect of all the chemical elements was positively associated with social functioning at 6.7% (aPR = 1.067; 95% CI: 0.694, 1.641; p > 0.10) (Table 3). While the combination of Pb and Cd had a positive joint impact (aPR = 1.585), Hg and As provided a joint antagonistic effect (aPR = 0.682), thus nullifying the overall combined effect. However, in the negative direction, prenatal exposure to Hg had the highest weight (99.78%), followed by As (0.225%), while in the positive direction, Cd had the most significant weight (60.5%), followed by Pb (39.5%). Even though no association was observed for either the chemical-specific or mixed model, Hg had a potentiation effect, while other elements remained relatively unchanged.

4. Discussion

Fifty percent of the children in this current study had neurodevelopmental impairment in one or more domains, which is higher than when these children were assessed (31%) in infancy [8]. Children developed additional impairments at three to four years, providing evidence that neurodevelopmental deficits from prenatal exposures continue later in life [31]. The increasing severity and prevalence of neurodevelopmental impairment among children as they age could occur for a variety of reasons. Firstly, brain development begins earlier in embryonic life and continues well beyond childhood into adulthood [38,39]. During these early stages, the brain cells undergo mitosis and migrate, differentiate, develop synaptic connections, and undergo programmed apoptosis [39]. Therefore, any interference from toxic exposures may alter subsequent developmental milestones [38,40]. Even a slight disruption from Pb and Hg at a fetal or infancy stage may continue to have long-term cascade effects later in life, including learning deficits [41]. Secondly, prenatally exposed children may continue to be exposed to even higher environmental pollutants after birth. Exposure at the community level also occurs from home, play, and travel, including to-from and at school [4244]. Drinking contaminated water or eating soil from the ground may add to the existing health burden carried by the prenatal exposure stages [44].

Generally, Pb and Hg appeared to induce a toxic effect on neurodevelopmental abilities among children. Significantly, when interacting with other chemical elements, their individual marginal effects are amplified beyond what would be expected under the additive assumption. Given the magnitude of neurodevelopmental impairment may increase as the child grows and even worsens when the child is multi-chemically exposed, stringent environmental control measures that limit toxic exposures are needed. Further, setting new safety reference levels that integrate multi-chemical exposure scenarios is necessary.

Joint exposure to Pb, As, Hg, and Cd increased the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment in one or more domains (the global neurodevelopmental impairment). While blood Pb and Hg were statistically significantly related to global neurodevelopmental impairment, Pb carried the most significant weight in the mixed model (contributing to about 59.3% of the total weight), suggesting its dominant role in inducing neurodevelopmental impairment. Compared to those with no formal education, children whose mothers had ordinary-level education had about a 70% reduced global neurodevelopmental ability. This trend suggests the need to consider how sociodemographic disparities and gender differences interact with multi-chemical exposures to elevate neurodevelopmental impairment among children.

Combined Pb, As, Cd, and Hg exposure was linked to decreased gross motor ability. Accounting for confounding effects, Pb independently reduced gross motor. In the presence of other chemicals, the negative impact of Pb on gross motor ability was higher than expected under the additive assumption. Our findings corroborate other international studies. For instance, prenatal exposure to Pb in the third trimester significantly decreased the development index of infants at 6 months of age [5]. In a Tanzanian study, Pb and As independently did not induce neurodevelopmental impairment among infants. However, when they acted in the presence of Hg, there was a potentiated outcome [8]. This may be explained by the neurotoxic effect of Pb on nerve cells [45]. Cell damage in the hippocampal and volt sections of the brain due to Pb exposure may affect execution function, including a decrease in gross motor function. Further, since Hg, Cd, and As may have similar biokinetic pathways for inducing toxicity, the marginal effect of Pb may be amplified when exposed jointly with other heavy metals. Clinical evidence suggests that the combined impact of Pb, Cd, and As can elevate neural oxidative stress by increasing the levels of Ca2+ [46]. They can also jointly stimulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK), and mitogen-activated protein kinase3 (MAPK3) pathways, which may cumulatively affect various neurological and psychomotor functions in children [46]. Even though Pb independently reduced the mental development index as reported among South Korean children, the effect amplified when it interacted with Hg and Cd [23]. A similar synergistic effect of Pb in the presence of Hg and polychlorinated biphenyls has been found between neurophysiological disorders and Pb exposure among children in Montreal, Canada [24].

Elevated Hg levels were linked to decreased gross motor function, accounting for approximately 36% of the total risk weight. Even though Hg independently reduced gross motor, the impact was higher in the presence of other metallic elements, suggesting a synergistic effect. For example, a quartile increase in Hg was linked to an 8.78% decrease in gross motor ability and about 16.8% when Hg interacted with Pb, Cd, and As. In a previous study from the US, poor psychomotor development among children at 6 months was associated with elevated prenatal Hg exposure [47]. The synergistic effect of Hg in the presence of Pb and Cd is equally reported in a study investigating cognitive development and multi-chemical exposures in South Korea [23]. Methylmercury, Pb, and As have similar neurological pathways, including disrupting the expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors [48]. Therefore, their individual effects may be more than additive when exposed in combination. We did not, however, find any association between Cd and As and gross motor ability. This may be explained by the restrictive passage of Cd through the placenta from the protein metallothionein [49,50]. Nevertheless, we found that their impact was elevated in the presence of Hg and Pb, suggesting they may also have potentiating effects. More studies are therefore needed to provide concrete evidence better.

Although the association was not statistically significant, Pb, Hg, As, and Cd reduced fine motor ability in multi-chemical and single-element models. Similarly, no association was found between heavy metals exposure and social interaction in single and multiple-chemical models. In the social interaction model, besides Hg, which was inversely linked, we observed a positive association with other heavy metals. This effect direction contradicts other studies’ reported effect direction [46,51,52], although it is possible the association in the current study was due to random chance.

The combined effect of Pb, As, Hg, and Cd was statistically significantly associated with decreased language ability, with Pb playing a significant role in the joint effect. Independently, the impact of Pb was synergistic, as the risk of language ability decline increased from 43% in single-element exposure to 49% in multi-chemical exposure. In addition to the reductive effect of Pb exposure on IQ scores, memory, social interaction, and deficits in language ability are observed among children exposed to Pb contamination [46]. Exposure to Pb is highly damaging to the central nervous system (CNS) [46]. Pb exposure affects the CNS’s dopaminergic, cholinergic, and glutamatergic systems. For instance, an abnormal release of dopamine transporters is linked to Pb exposure, which can increase language and communication difficulties [46,53]. Additionally, the cholinergic system known to regulate energy metabolism can be affected by Pb exposure [46,54].

In a recent study, children who resided in Pb-contaminated neighborhoods had smaller volumes of the mid-anterior and mid-posterior corpus callosum [55]. The decline in these systems affected processing and language speed [55]. In a large National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study, about 1,025,695 people in the U.S. who were born between 1989 and 1998 and had difficulties in listening, reading, reasoning, or speaking were exposed to elevated Pb levels [56]. Similarly, exposure to > 22.2ppm of Pb was linked to an 8.6-point decrease in word identification test compared to those exposed to 5.99ppm [46]. As the primary target may involve the CNS, the health consequences may be long-term extending from infancy to adulthood. This may explain why about 50% of children in our current study had neurodevelopmental impairment in at least one of the four domains, compared to 31% during infancy. The effects may worsen as the child grows and gets exposed to multiple pollutants from diverse sources.

Hg exposure significantly reduced language ability in single-element and multi-chemical exposure models. Children with an increased level of Hg in their hair, fingernails, and toenails are more likely to score lower in the Bayley-III scale score of expressive language [57]. Other studies support this evidence [5860]. Our results also support a study in Spain where prenatal Hg exposure has been associated with poor performance in verbal function at 4–5 years of age [59]. However, in the reactive presence of other heavy metals, a decreased risk of Hg exposure, from 54% risk to 22% was discovered. This may be due to different elements’ antagonistic effects in the joint model. Even though a quartile increases in Cd and As were associated with a 4% and 14% decrease in language ability, respectively, they were not statistically significant. This is supported by the finding in the Korean population study among children, where early prenatal Cd exposure had no significant association with cognitive and psychomotor developmental impairment, even with increased Pb levels at 6 months of age [61]. Similar findings have been reported in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [62]. Since this study considered a marginal population-level effect, we recommend that future studies focus on sub-group studies to better examine the complexities of these linkages. Our findings suggest that existing safety thresholds, predominantly based on single-element studies, would need to be modified to account for the joint exposure effect from heavy metals and other environmental pollutants. Secondly, considering that the health effects may worsen as the child grows due to the cumulative impact of pre-and postnatal exposures, there is likely a need to establish community–based early childhood development interventions in areas with ASGM activities. The need to provide young children with cognitively stimulating activities and expose them to learning opportunities and better activity spaces is crucial. The current study provides evidence that supports a call for action to reduce environmental pollution associated with ASGM activities in affected areas. There is a need to promote the implementation of early childhood stimulation programs to minimize the impact of developmental impairments among children residing in ASGM areas.

The findings that the individual marginal effects of Pb and Hg on neurodevelopmental abilities are amplified beyond what would be expected under the additive assumption when reacted with other chemical elements calls for strengthening the growing demand to modify existing health risk reduction strategies, which are predominantly based on single-element assessment. Adapting existing safety thresholds in the context of multi-chemical exposures, which is a reality for women and children in gold mining areas, may be timely. While the combined effects of these heavy metals may lead to synergistic impacts, socioeconomic disparities, and gender likely play an interactive role. This underscores the need to incorporate subgroup modeling into the multi-chemical exposure assessment framework.

5. Limitations of the study

This study is limited to prenatal exposure among children born to mothers in ASGM communities. This follow-up nested study does not consider exposures to chemical elements post-delivery. The actual amount of the toxic chemical elements transferred to the fetus may vary from one woman to another depending on maternal health status [62]. Future bio-monitoring studies should consider maternal health status and individual children’s exposure status. Recruitment was limited for consistency to mother-child pairs who stayed in the ASGM area to follow up on neurodevelopment. Children were assessed at a time when they were not sick or in need of any medical assistance. The individual children’s percentile scores in each domain during the assessment, apart from the passing or failing of a child at the 90% percentile level for their age, might have reduced the precision of the results. However, using a validated African-developed tool (i.e., the MDAT) provides robustness to the findings and accounts for the local settings. The adequate sample size and sampling of appropriate bio-indicators (i.e., maternal prenatal blood for Hg, Pb, and Cd; and urine for As) [62] provide value to the integrity of the findings.

Although this study controlled for factors including birthweight, socioeconomic status, gender, education, and age of the child, a multitude of other environmental exposures and socioeconomic factors can contribute to or mediate cognitive impairment. As a result of the complexity of contributions to cognitive impairment, even though this current research documents an association, the results are not causal. Instead, the results strongly suggest a need to focus on multiple chemical interactions when seeking to understand the influence of environmental exposures on cognitive impairment. Further, future studies would benefit from improved occupational classifications and direct exposure biomarkers.

6. Conclusion

Children born to women in areas with ASGM activities who are prenatally exposed to Pb, Hg, and As are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment. The cumulative impact of all chemicals was significant for gross motor, language ability, and general impairment. The magnitude of neurodevelopmental impairments increases as children grow. The independent effects of Pb and Hg were amplified beyond what would be expected under the additive assumption, suggesting synergistic or potentiating effects. Neurodevelopmental health risks among children varied according to gender, educational, and socioeconomic status (SES), drawing attention to the need for studies focused on environmental health inequities in the African context.

Supporting information

S1 Table

Forward-backward stepwise regression performance metrics and variables maintained. The blue-colored variables are finally selected according to AIC and Deviance.

(DOCX)

pgph.0004577.s001.docx (20.2KB, docx)
S2 Table. Median heavy metal levels by mother’s occupation.

(DOCX)

pgph.0004577.s002.docx (15.8KB, docx)
S1 Data. De-identified data and detailed information regarding the participants.

(SAV)

pgph.0004577.s003.sav (175.8KB, sav)
S1 Checklist. STROBE Statement—checklist of observational studies.

(DOCX)

pgph.0004577.s004.docx (67.6KB, docx)
S2 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

pgph.0004577.s005.docx (37.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the healthcare workers, women, and children participating in theTanzania Mining and Health Cohort for participating in this study. The authors acknowledge support and assistance from the Strengthening One Health and Planetary Health in East Africa (SOPHEA).

Data Availability

De-identified data and detailed information regarding the participants are available, See S1_Data.

Funding Statement

Partial funding for the fieldwork and laboratory work was received from the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences to ECN & the Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte to MA. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):60–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60032-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Early Childhood Development. UNICEF Vision for Every Child: New York; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Black MM, Walker SP, Fernald LCH, Andersen CT, DiGirolamo AM, Lu C, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):77–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jackson MI. A life course perspective on child health, academic experiences and occupational skill qualifications in adulthood: evidence from a British Cohort. Soc Forces. 2010;89(1):89–116. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bauer JA, Devick KL, Bobb JF, Coull BA, Bellinger D, Benedetti C, et al. Associations of a metal mixture measured in multiple biomarkers with IQ: evidence from Italian adolescents living near ferroalloy industry. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(9):97002. doi: 10.1289/EHP6803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scattolin MA de A, Resegue RM, Rosário MC do. The impact of the environment on neurodevelopmental disorders in early childhood. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022;98:66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Golding J, Gregory S, Iles-Caven Y, Hibbeln J, Emond A, Taylor CM. Associations between prenatal mercury exposure and early child development in the ALSPAC study. Neurotoxicology. 2016;53:215–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nyanza EC, Bernier FP, Martin JW, Manyama M, Hatfield J, Dewey D. Effects of prenatal exposure and co-exposure to metallic or metalloid elements on early infant neurodevelopmental outcomes in areas with small-scale gold mining activities in Northern Tanzania. Environ Int. 2021;149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(3):330–8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klus JK, Thurston SW, Myers GJ, Watson GE, Rand MD, Love TM, et al. Postnatal methylmercury exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 7 years of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study Nutrition Cohort 2. Neurotoxicology. 2023;99:115–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2023.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bellinger DC, Matthews-Bellinger JA, Kordas K. A developmental perspective on early-life exposure to neurotoxicants. Environ Int. 2016;94:103–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Debes F, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Weihe P, White RF, Grandjean P. Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;28(3):363–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gao Y, Yan C-H, Tian Y, Wang Y, Xie H-F, Zhou X, et al. Prenatal exposure to mercury and neurobehavioral development of neonates in Zhoushan City, China. Environ Res. 2007;105(3):390–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Msoffe CU, Nyanza EC, Thomas DSK, Jahanpour O, Dewey D. The sources and chemical content of edible soil sticks sold in markets in Tanzania: a cross-sectional analytical study. Environ Geochem Health. 2019;41(2):893–906. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0185-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nyanza EC, Joseph M, Premji SS, Thomas DS, Mannion C. Geophagy practices and the content of chemical elements in the soil eaten by pregnant women in artisanal and small scale gold mining communities in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Taylor BA, Casas-Ganem J, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Hanscom BS, Albert TJ. Differences in the work-up and treatment of conditions associated with low back pain by patient gender and ethnic background. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(3):359–64. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152115.79236.6e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Steckling N, Tobollik M, Plass D, Hornberg C, Ericson B, Fuller R, et al. Global burden of disease of mercury used in artisanal small-scale gold mining. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Taylor H, Appleton JD, Lister R, Smith B, Chitamweba D, Mkumbo O, et al. Environmental assessment of mercury contamination from the Rwamagasa artisanal gold mining centre, Geita District, Tanzania. Sci Total Environ. 2005;343(1–3):111–33. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nyanza EC, Dewey D, Thomas DSK, Davey M, Ngallaba SE. Spatial distribution of mercury and arsenic levels in water, soil and cassava plants in a community with long history of gold mining in Tanzania. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;93(6):716–21. doi: 10.1007/s00128-014-1315-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Proctor K, Jagadeesan K, Lopardo L, O’Daly KJ, Standerwick R, et al. Estimation of community-wide multi-chemical exposure via water-based chemical mining: Key research gaps drawn from a comprehensive multi-biomarker multi-city dataset. Environ Int. 2021;147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pécheux M, Saoudi A, Zeghnoun A, Oleko A, Fillol C. Assessment of multi-chemical exposure using human biomonitoring data from the French Esteban study using exposure load method. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022;246:114054. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Willey JB, Pollock T, Thomson EM, Liang CL, Maquiling A, Walker M, et al. Exposure Load: Using biomonitoring data to quantify multi-chemical exposure burden in a population. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021;234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shah-Kulkarni S, Lee S, Jeong KS, Hong Y-C, Park H, Ha M, et al. Prenatal exposure to mixtures of heavy metals and neurodevelopment in infants at 6 months. Environ Res. 2020;182:109122. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boucher O, Burden MJ, Muckle G, Saint-Amour D, Ayotte P, Dewailly É, et al. Response inhibition and error monitoring during a visual go/no-go task in inuit children exposed to lead, polychlorinated biphenyls, and methylmercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(4):608–15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hernández AF, Tsatsakis AM. Human exposure to chemical mixtures: challenges for the integration of toxicology with epidemiology data in risk assessment. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;103:188–93. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nyanza EC, Bernier FP, Manyama M, Hatfield J, Martin JW, Dewey D. Maternal exposure to arsenic and mercury in small-scale gold mining areas of Northern Tanzania. Environ Res. 2019;173:432–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Choi AL, Grandjean P. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans. Environ Chem. 2008;5(2):112–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.ChingChun LCL, YuChuan CYC, FengChiao SFS, ChienMu LCL, HuaFang LHL, YawHuei HYH, et al. In utero exposure to environmental lead and manganese and neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Palumbo D, Cernichiari E, et al. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study. Lancet. 2003;361(9370):1686–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13371-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Grump KS, Kjellström T, Shipp AM, Silvers A, Stewart A. Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychologica test performance: Benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort. Risk Anal. 1998;18(6):701–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kippler M, Tofail F, Hamadani JD, Gardner RM, Grantham-McGregor SM, Bottai M, et al. Early-life cadmium exposure and child development in 5-year-old girls and boys: a cohort study in rural Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(10):1462–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nyanza EC, Dewey D, Manyama M, Martin JW, Hatfield J, Bernier FP. Maternal exposure to arsenic and mercury and associated risk of adverse birth outcomes in small-scale gold mining communities in Northern Tanzania. Environ Int. 2020;137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.TNBS-MIS (Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics- Malaria Indicator Survey). Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) - Final Report 2015-16. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nyanza EC, Dewey D, Bernier F, Manyama M, Hatfield J, Martin JW. Validation of dried blood spots for maternal biomonitoring of nonessential elements in an artisanal and small-scale gold mining area of Tanzania. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019;38(6):1285–93. doi: 10.1002/etc.4420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gladstone M, Lancaster GA, Umar E, Nyirenda M, Kayira E, Broek NR van den, et al. The Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT): The creation, validation, and reliability of a tool to assess child development in rural African settings. PLoS Med. 2010;7(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Keil AP, Buckley JP, O’Brien KM, Ferguson KK, Zhao S, White AJ. A quantile-based g-computation approach to addressing the effects of exposure mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keil A. The qgcomp package: g-computation on exposure quantiles. The qgcomp package: g-computation on exposure quantiles. 2023.
  • 38.Bellinger DC. Prenatal exposures to environmental chemicals and children’s neurodevelopment: an update. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schettler T. Toxic threats to neurologic development of children. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(suppl 6):813–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Makri A, Goveia M, Balbus J, Parkin R. Children’s susceptibility to chemicals: a review by developmental stage. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2004;7(6):417–35. doi: 10.1080/10937400490512465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Harari R, Julvez J, Murata K, Barr D, Bellinger DC, Debes F, et al. Neurobehavioral deficits and increased blood pressure in school-age children prenatally exposed to pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(6):890–6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Landrigan PJ, Baker EL. Exposure of children to heavy metals from smelters: Epidemiology and toxic consequences. Environ Res. 1981;25(1):204–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ngo HTT, Watchalayann P, Nguyen DB, Doan HN, Liang L. Environmental health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure among children living in an informal e-waste processing village in Viet Nam. Sci Total Environ. 2021;763:142982. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Parlak M, Tunçay T, Botsou F. Heavy Metals in Soil and Sand from Playgrounds of Çanakkale City (Turkey), and Related Health Risks for Children. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1145. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dribben WH, Creeley CE, Farber N. Low-level lead exposure triggers neuronal apoptosis in the developing mouse brain. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2011;33(4):473–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Goel A, Aschner M. The Effect of Lead Exposure on Autism Development. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4):1637. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Marques RC, Garrofe Dórea J, Rodrigues Bastos W, de Freitas Rebelo M, de Freitas Fonseca M, Malm O. Maternal mercury exposure and neuro-motor development in breastfed infants from Porto Velho (Amazon), Brazil. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007;210(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Vuong AM, Yolton K, Braun JM, Lanphear BP, Chen A. Chemical mixtures and neurobehavior: a review of epidemiologic findings and future directions. Rev Environ Health. 2020;35(3):245–56. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2020-0010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Caserta D, Graziano A, Lo Monte G, Bordi G, Moscarini M. Heavy metals and placental fetal-maternal barrier: a mini-review on the major concerns. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(16):2198–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kippler M, Hoque AMW, Raqib R, Ohrvik H, Ekström E-C, Vahter M. Accumulation of cadmium in human placenta interacts with the transport of micronutrients to the fetus. Toxicol Lett. 2010;192(2):162–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mendelsohn AL, Benard L, Dreyer P, Fierman AH, Rosen CM, Legano LA, et al. Low-Level Lead Exposure and Behavior in Early Childhood [Internet]. Vol. 101. 1998. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/3/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Roy A, Bellinger D, Hu H, Schwartz J, Ettinger AS, Wright RO, et al. Lead exposure and behavior among young children in Chennai, India. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(10):1607–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chao OY, Pathak SS, Zhang H, Dunaway N, Li J-S, Mattern C, et al. Altered dopaminergic pathways and therapeutic effects of intranasal dopamine in two distinct mouse models of autism. Mol Brain. 2020;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13041-020-00649-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Balfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(6):507–15. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.6.507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marshall AT, McConnell R, Lanphear BP, Thompson WK, Herting MM, Sowell ER. Risk of lead exposure, subcortical brain structure, and cognition in a large cohort of 9- to 10-year-old children. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. Blood lead levels and learning disabilities: a cross-sectional study of the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hsi H-C, Jiang C-B, Yang T-H, Chien L-C. The neurological effects of prenatal and postnatal mercury/methylmercury exposure on three-year-old children in Taiwan. Chemosphere. 2014;100:71–6. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Freire C, Ramos R, Lopez-Espinosa M-J, Díez S, Vioque J, Ballester F, et al. Hair mercury levels, fish consumption, and cognitive development in preschool children from Granada, Spain . Environ Res. 2010;110(1):96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Freire C, Amaya E, Gil F, Fernández MF, Murcia M, Llop S, et al. Prenatal co-exposure to neurotoxic metals and neurodevelopment in preschool children: The Environment and Childhood (INMA) Project. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:340–51. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Surkan PJ, Wypij D, Trachtenberg F, Daniel DB, Barregard L, McKinlay S, et al. Neuropsychological function in school-age children with low mercury exposures. Environ Res. 2009;109(6):728–33. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim JH, Jeong KS, Ha E-H, Park H, Ha M, Hong Y-C, et al. Association between prenatal exposure to cadmium and atopic dermatitis in infancy. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(4):516–21. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.4.516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ciesielski T, Weuve J, Bellinger DC, Schwartz J, Lanphear B, Wright RO. Cadmium exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in U.S. children. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(5):758–63. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004577.r002

Decision Letter 0

Muhammad Asaduzzaman

9 Feb 2025

PGPH-D-24-02727

Effects of Prenatal Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic Exposure on Children’s Neurodevelopment in an Artisanal Small-scale Gold Mining Area in Northwestern Tanzania Using a Multi-chemical Exposure Model

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Elias C. Nyanza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by February 20, 2025. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Muhammad Asaduzzaman, MD MPH MPhil

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format.

For more information about figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures 

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirements 

2. We do not publish any copyright or trademark symbols that usually accompany proprietary names, eg (R), (C), or TM  (e.g. next to drug or reagent names). Please remove all instances of trademark/copyright symbols throughout the text, including ® on page 5.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria ? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Overall this is a great paper and I have only minor comments. I also applaud this research as it pertains specifically to more marginalized populations and since I spent 15 years setting up medical services in remote rural underserved settings, I think of folks like these as exactly the kind of populations I like to see supported. I only have some minor comments:

How did you control for cognitive impairment related to other potential causes, since diet and many, many other causes are also known to contribute to this? The inconsistency you mention in previous studies probably is impacted by this issue.

You mention "Children developed additional impairments at three to four years, providing evidence that neurodevelopmental deficits from prenatal exposures continue 1 later in life" but although I would believe that, this seems like an assumption that does not consider the many other factors that can contribute to deficits besides pre-natal exposure, such as early childhood education, mental stimulation at home, diet in infancy and early childhood, etc. Not so much proof, as you indicate, but an association that certainly should be explored further to try and demonstrate a causal relationship in a study that controls for other factors besides heavy metal exposure. I have no doubt such a study would in fact find that independent of all other factors, the heavy metal exposure carries a greatly increased risk, but I think that's something to explore in future studies. You do actually mention the need for this in the very last sentence of the discussion, but I think you may need to go through the paper and be careful to acknowledge the likely multifactorial causes that are surely at work here in addition to chemical exposure in utero--especially since this entire paper is about the synergistic multifactorial impact of heavy metal exposure, where previous studies have mainly looked at single or few possible contaminant exposures. Surely the other external factors in utero, infancy and early childhood also have potentially synergistic impacts on this as well? Maternal diet? Birth complications? Maternal and infant/early childhood infections? Breastfeeding and early infant/childhood diet? Exposure to other industrial or agricultural products that may be known (or suspected) to have an impact?

The gender differences seem to indicate that either there is some gender-based difference in development in utero that creates additional risk, OR perhaps there are gender-based differences in exposure in infnacy and early childhood; I think the study needs to acknowledge this as a limitation.

Reviewer #3: In the introduction, the authors state that: 'An estimated 200 million children under five in Sub-Saharan Africa do not reach their full cognitive development potential.' They need to specify whether this figure refers to an annual estimate, a decade, or another time frame.

Reviewer #4: The manuscript is well-written in standard English with very little typos (only one seen). The structure of the manuscript meets PLOS requirement with the contents under each heading adhering to acceptable international standards. The tables and figures are labeled and explained to my satisfaction. Though I did not have access to the data, adequate analysis was performed to answer the aim of the study and there is a request to perform one or two additional analysis.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Dr. Benjamin LaBrot

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Rita Nugem

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-02727_reviewer.pdf

pgph.0004577.s007.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004577.r004

Decision Letter 1

Muhammad Asaduzzaman

10 Apr 2025

Effects of Prenatal Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic Exposure on Children’s Neurodevelopment in an Artisanal Small-scale Gold Mining Area in Northwestern Tanzania Using a Multi-chemical Exposure Model

PGPH-D-24-02727R1

Dear Dr. Elias C. Nyanza,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Effects of Prenatal Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic Exposure on Children’s Neurodevelopment in an Artisanal Small-scale Gold Mining Area in Northwestern Tanzania Using a Multi-chemical Exposure Model' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Muhammad Asaduzzaman, MD MPH MPhil

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table

    Forward-backward stepwise regression performance metrics and variables maintained. The blue-colored variables are finally selected according to AIC and Deviance.

    (DOCX)

    pgph.0004577.s001.docx (20.2KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Median heavy metal levels by mother’s occupation.

    (DOCX)

    pgph.0004577.s002.docx (15.8KB, docx)
    S1 Data. De-identified data and detailed information regarding the participants.

    (SAV)

    pgph.0004577.s003.sav (175.8KB, sav)
    S1 Checklist. STROBE Statement—checklist of observational studies.

    (DOCX)

    pgph.0004577.s004.docx (67.6KB, docx)
    S2 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    pgph.0004577.s005.docx (37.8KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to the Editor.docx

    pgph.0004577.s006.docx (14.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-24-02727_reviewer.pdf

    pgph.0004577.s007.pdf (2.5MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to the Editor_22.03.2025.docx

    pgph.0004577.s008.docx (19.3KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    De-identified data and detailed information regarding the participants are available, See S1_Data.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES