Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 16;9:e56586. doi: 10.2196/56586

Table 4.

Results regarding implementation factors for formal carers in the photo activity (experimental) and general conversation (control) groups based on comparable questions from the semistructured interviews after the 4-week intervention.

Outcome variable Experimental group (n=18), n (%) Control group (n=24), n (%) Difference tests P valuea Effect size

U Chi-square (df)
r Cramér V
Medium and format training 209.5 b .83 −0.03

Very effective 2 (11) 1 (4)





Effective 12 (67) 20 (83)





Somewhat effective 3 (17) 2 (8)





Not effective 1 (6) 1 (4)




Activity durationc 0.4 (2) .84 0.09

Too short 1 (4) 2 (7)





Just right 13 (56) 13 (48)





Too long 9 (39) 11 (41)





Missing 0 (0) 1 (4)




4-wk activity period 1.1 (2) .59 0.16

Too short 2 (11) 1 (4)





Just right 9 (50) 15 (62)





Too long 7 (39) 8 (33)




Activity frequency 0.8 (2) .67 0.14

Too little 0 (0) 1 (4)





Just right 10 (56) 12 (50)





Too often 8 (44) 11 (46)




aSignificance level set at P<.05.

bNot applicable.

cThe n varies for Activity duration, as some formal carers were asked to answer this question multiple times if they did the photo-activity or control activity with more than one resident. Thus formal carers in the photo-activity is n=23, and control activity n=27, as in Figure 4.