Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 18;40(6):1280–1287. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09128-4

Table 1.

Characteristics for Participants Who Were Invited and Responded to the Survey

Characteristics Participants Breast Cervical Colorectal
(n = 241) (n = 66) (n = 79) (n = 96)
Age, median (q1, q3), years 55 (42, 64) 54 (47, 59) 36 (33, 45) 63 (58, 70)
Sex
  Female 192 (79.7%) 66 (100.0%) 79 (100.0%) 47 (49.0%)
  Male 49 (20.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 49 (51.0%)
Race*
  Asian 5 (2.1%) 2 (3.0%) 3 (3.8%) 0 (0.0%)
  Black or African American 23 (9.5%) 9 (13.6%) 9 (11.4%) 5 (5.2%)
  Other 16 (6.6%) 2 (3.0%) 9 (11.4%) 5 (5.2%)
  White 194 (80.5%) 52 (78.8%) 57 (72.2%) 85 (88.5%)
Ethnicity, Hispanic or Latino 19 (7.9%) 5 (7.6%) 9 (11.4%) 5 (5.2%)
Primary language Spanish 6 (2.5%) 2 (3.0%) 3 (3.8%) 1 (1.0%)
Marital status, married/life partner 117 (48.5%) 40 (60.6%) 19 (24.1%) 58 (60.4%)
Primary insurance
  Commercial 154 (63.9%) 45 (68.2%) 55 (69.6%) 54 (56.2%)
  Medicare 44 (18.3%) 8 (12.1%) 1 (1.3%) 35 (36.5%)
  Dual/Medicaid 41 (17%) 13 (19.7%) 22 (27.8%) 6 (6.2%)
  Other/uninsured/unknown 2 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.3%) 1 (1.0%)
Charlson score†
  0 136 (56.4%) 38 (57.6%) 56 (70.9%) 42 (43.8%)
  1 50 (20.7%) 13 (19.7%) 12 (15.2%) 25 (26.0%)
  2 +  55 (22.8%) 15 (22.7%) 11 (13.9%) 29 (30.2%)
Severity of screening test abnormality‡
  Low 125 (51.9%) 60 (90.9%) 5 ( 6.3%) 60 (62.5%)
  Moderate 71 (29.5%) 6 ( 9.1%) 36 (45.6%) 29 (30.2%)
  High 45 (18.7%) 0 ( 0.0%) 38 (48.1%) 7 (7.3%)
Primary care visit in past year§ 171 (71%) 45 (68.2%) 51 (64.6%) 75 (78.1%)
Completed 120-day recommended follow-up 118 (49%) 42 (63.6%) 33 (41.8%) 43 (44.8%)

Values presented are median (q1, q3), or numbers (%)

*Race and ethnicity description: Patient demographic variables including gender, race, ethnicity, and marital status were patient self-reported in open-ended questions collected as part of routine care during patient registration

†Charlson scores by calculating it from diagnosis codes (ICD-10) pulled for dates 2 years prior to the patient’s enrollment.18

‡Risk of the screening abnormality was based on guidelines or specialist consensus. For example, a BIRADs 3 mammogram was considered low risk, a BIRADs 4 was considered medium risk, and a BIRADs 5 was considered high risk.14

§Visit occurring in same health system as testing