Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 15;6(4):102045. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102045

Table 2.

Distribution of patients based on tumor regression grade and pathological and radiological features

Pathological complete and major pathological response
N = 9
Non-major pathological response
N = 41
p valuea
TRG 0
N = 7
TRG 1
N = 2
TRG 2
N = 16
TRG 3
N = 25
Histological grade:
well differentiated
moderately differentiated
poorly differentiated

1 (14.3%)
1 (14.3%)
5 (71.4%)

0 (0.0%)
1 (50.0%)
1 (50.0%)

0 (0.0%)
9 (56.3%)
7 (43.7%)

2 (8.0%)
10 (40.0%)
13 (52.0%)
0.376
PDL1 (CPS)
<1
1≥ to <5
≥5 to <10
≥10
unknown
0 (0.0%)
2 (28.6%)
2 (28.6%)
2 (28.6%)
1 (14.3%)
0 (0.0%)
2 (100.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (6.3%)
4 (25.0%)
9 (56.3%)
2 (12.5%)
4 (16.0%)
9 (36.0%)
4 (16.0%)
6 (24.0%)
2 (8.0%)
0.439
0.943
0.751
0.341
PDL1 (TPS)
low (<70)
high (≥70)
unknown
6 (85.7%)
0 (0.0%)
1 (14.3%)
2 (100.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
13 (81.2%)
1 (6.3%)
2 (12.5%)
23 (92.0%)
0 (0.0%)
2 (8.0%)
>0.999
MMR status
preserved
deficient
unknown
4 (57.1%)
2 (28.6%)
1 (14.3%)
2 (100.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
12 (75.0%)
3 (18.8%)
1 (6.3%)
23 (92.0%)
3 (12.0%)
1 (4.0%)
0.601
HER2 status
positive
negative
unknown
0 (0.0%)
5 (71.4%)
2 (28.6%)
1 (50.0%)
1 (50.0%)
0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
15 (93.8%)
1 (6.3%)
2 (8.0%)
22 (88.0%)
1 (4.0%)
0.398
Change in SUVmax
>35%
<35%
5 (71.4%)
2 (28.6%)
1 (50.0%)
1 (50.0%)
13 (81.2%)
3 (18.8%)
14 (56.0%)
11 (44.0%)
>0.999
a

Comparing MPR vs. non-MPR status.