ABSTRACT
Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has evolved significantly as a critical tool in diagnosing and managing cardiac diseases, greatly facilitated by technological advancements in multidetector systems, dose-reduction techniques, and sophisticated imaging algorithms. This article discusses the historical progression and technological evolution in cardiac CT (CCT), focusing on the impact of 64-multidetector row CT and dual-energy CT systems on improving spatial and temporal resolutions and reducing radiation exposure. It explores the role of these technologies in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, such as through detailed three-dimensional reconstructions and minimized imaging artifacts. Furthermore, it highlights the integration of machine learning to automate complex imaging analysis and photon-counting CT, which promises higher resolution and further dose reduction. Prospective studies and ongoing trials such as FASTTRACK coronary artery bypass grafting also underscore the potential of advanced CT technologies in refining procedural planning and execution. The continuous advancements in detector technology, computational techniques, and image reconstruction are poised to expand the applications and efficacy of CCT, cementing its role in modern cardiology.
KEYWORDS: Calcium score, Computed tomography, Coronary anomaly, Coronary artery disease, Coronary computed tomography
INTRODUCTION
The era for cardiac computed tomography
Imaging the heart with computed tomography (CT) is particularly challenging due to its rapid, involuntary movements and complex structure, which make two-dimensional imaging insufficient. Various techniques, such as electron beam CT, ECG gating, and extensive computing, have been explored to mitigate cardiac motion [1]. The advent of multidetector CT, which provides isometric voxels, has significantly enhanced the capability for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction [2]. Currently, cardiac CT (CCT) has increasingly become vital in diagnosing cardiac diseases, evaluating postprocedural outcomes, and preventing severe cardiac events.
Another major concern in the application of CCT is the radiation dose, especially for patients undergoing multiple radiological examinations. Advances in technology with 256-row or higher scanners have significantly reduced radiation exposure compared to older 64-row CT scanners. An estimated 32% reduction in radiation dose has been documented [3], and further advances have brought the typical CCT radiation dose down to 2.7 mSv in the PROTECTION VI study across 62 countries [4], compared to 40 mSv from traditional thallium scan stress tests and 7 mSv from diagnostic coronary angiography.
In this article, we explore the historical advancements in CT technology, the diverse applications of CCT, and the promising future prospects of CCT. With continuous advancements in CT detector technology and computing capabilities, we anticipate witnessing an expansion of applications for CCT in the coming years.
Advancement in cardiac computed tomography
64-multidetector row coronary computed tomography
Spatial and temporal resolutions are paramount in CCT imaging. The emergence of 64-multidetector row CT has reduced the slice thickness to <0.625 mm, enabling the reconstruction of detailed coronary arteries in a precise manner [5,6]. Furthermore, radiation exposure from coronary CT has been significantly lowered due to novel developments in detector and image reconstruction technologies [7], marking the beginning of the era of cardiac, especially coronary CT [8].
Dual-energy computed tomography
Dual-energy CT (DECT) employs two energy levels of X-ray beams within a single detector setup, offering a higher temporal resolution of 125 ms [9]. Unlike single-energy X-ray tubes that emit a spectrum of X-rays, DECT provides two distinct energy levels, typically 80 and 140 kV [10]. This technology can create virtual monoenergetic images that minimize the blooming artifact from coronary stents and calcium plaques, potentially reducing the false-positive rate of coronary stenosis [11]. DECT also allows for the noninvasive analysis of the atomic number of coronary plaques, rather than just their CT density, providing insights into the composition of the plaques [12]. Recent studies show that DECT reduces beam hardening artifacts commonly seen when the superior vena cava is filled with concentrated contrast medium, thereby improving the accuracy of myocardial perfusion measurements [13].
To guarantee reliable diagnostic outcomes, CCT systems must provide comprehensive anatomical coverage of the entire heart, as well as deliver high temporal and spatial resolution and sufficient contrast differentiation among various tissues. The newly designed system tackles these requirements and the hardware constraints of 4 cm machines by offering uncompromised, high-performance cardiac imaging from the ground up.
Wide-coverage computed tomography and freeze motion correction systems
Currently, CT scanners were featured with 16 cm detectors, which include 256 detectors, enabling consistent whole-heart coverage in a single-beat acquisition, thus preventing issues such as beat-to-beat contrast banding and anatomical mis-registrations. The wide-coverage CT scanner also delivers high spatial resolution for cardiac imaging, with in-plane and longitudinal resolutions of 14.8 lp/cm and 18.2 lp/cm, respectively, aiding in assessments such as stent restenosis, vessel patency, and measurements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Studies indicate superior image quality with the 16 cm scanner over the 4 cm model for fast heart rates, demonstrating more frequent excellent and good quality studies and better contrast-to-noise and signal-to-noise ratios [14]. In addition, the 16 cm detector CT scanner allows for scanning at low radiation doses while maintaining excellent image quality even under high heart rate conditions [15].
Furthermore, the wide coverage CT incorporates modern image reconstruction technology, which applies intelligent coronary artery and whole-heart motion correction during reconstruction to minimize motion artifacts during scans [16,17]. With a gantry speed of 0.28 s/rotation, this technology effectively reduces motion artifacts to a level comparable to a 0.047 s gantry rotation, achieving an effective temporal resolution of 24 ms. This benefit is validated in both commercially available motion phantoms and mathematical cardiac phantoms with linear variable velocity motion. Snapshot freeze (SSF) significantly mitigates motion artifacts in the coronary artery, aortic annulus, and whole heart, thereby enhancing image quality and measurement accuracy, particularly in patients with high heart rates or during the systolic phase at a 40% R-R interval [17]. Furthermore, the use of SSF in image reconstruction technology ensures high-quality cardiac imaging in children with high heart rates [18].
Role of calcium score
The Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS) is a quantitative assessment of coronary artery calcifications, requiring ECG gating during scanning without the need for contrast medium delivery, thereby reducing the risk of drug allergies. The CACS serves as a crucial indicator for downgrading or upgrading the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes both stroke and coronary heart disease [19]. According to the American Heart Association guidelines, a CACS of 0 suggests withholding statin therapy, whereas a CACS over 100 indicates the initiation of such treatment [20]. For low-risk individuals with a CACS of 0, repeating the measurement every 5–10 years is recommended to monitor changes [21]. In addition, guidelines suggest using CACS to guide aspirin therapy in individuals with a CACS over 100 who have a low bleeding risk and are not at low risk for ASCVD [22]. Emerging evidence indicates that a CACS over 220 carries similar risks to those enrolled in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, affecting hypertension management guidelines [23]. The increasing recognition of the CACS in stratifying ASCVD risk has led some healthcare providers such as UnitedHealthcare and Aetna to cover CACS, affirming its cost-effectiveness.
Cardiac perfusion evaluation by computed tomography angiography
CT is employed not only for anatomical assessments but also for evaluating cardiac function. Cardiac perfusion CT (CPCT) dynamically assesses myocardial perfusion status using contrast-enhanced CT. This method requires both rest and stress tests to be conducted sequentially. In case there is suspicious of myocardial scar formation, another session of CT scanning 10 min after contrast medium injection can detect delayed myocardial enhancement, which indicates the retention of iodinated contrast medium in the myocardial interstitial space, providing valuable insights into tissue viability [24]. A meta-analysis has estimated the sensitivity and specificity of CPCT to be 81% and 93%, respectively, highlighting its superior anatomical detail compared to single-photon emission computed tomography [25]. Although CPCT offers better anatomical information, concerns about radiation exposure from repeated scans remain. Nevertheless, ongoing advancements in CT technology are pushing toward greater applicability of CPCT as a standard method for cardiac perfusion studies.
Coronary computed tomography angiography
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is noted for its high sensitivity (>95%) and negative predictive value (>95%), making it a significant noninvasive diagnostic method, particularly valuable for stable chest pain patients and reducing the likelihood of procedure-related complications compared to invasive coronary angiography [7]. Some studies suggest CCTA as the additional tool for evaluation for patients presenting with typical stable, atypical, or anginal symptoms, regardless of their coronary artery disease (CAD) history [25]. Figure 1 is the demonstration of CCTA in the diagnosis of right coronary artery stenosis (the figures are proved by the IRB committee in Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital: IRB No.: IRB112-240-B). CCTA is also indicated for investigating inconclusive cardiac functional tests or in asymptomatic patients at high risk of CAD. However, its use as a screening tool in asymptomatic or low-to-intermediate risk patients remains controversial [26].
Figure 1.
Coronary computed tomography angiography of a 56-year-old man. It showed severe (70%–95%, white circle) stenosis in the right coronary artery (RCA), confirmed by volume-rendering (a) as well as multiplanar reconstruction (b-d). Note spotty calcifications (arrow) in the plaque of RCA, implies vulnerable plaque. RA: Right atrium, RV: Right ventricle
Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve
Fractional flow reserve (FFRct) is a computational technique that simulates the pressure, flow, and fluid dynamics throughout the coronary tree without the need for additional medication, imaging, or radiation exposure [27]. It has been shown to result in 14% more revascularizations in stable chest pain patients compared to traditional myocardial perfusion imaging, highlighting its clinical relevance [28]. FFRct, processed from CCTA data, has demonstrated cost-effectiveness, particularly in individuals with intermediate to high risk of CAD, while proving ideal for those at low to intermediate risk [29]. Further evidence supports FFRct’s utility in evaluating coronary artery conditions in patients with stable angina experiencing recurrent chest pain [30,31]. In addition, FFRct has proven effective in assessing coronary status postheart transplantation [32].
The overview of CACS, CCTA, and FFR was further illustrated in Figure 2, which describes the current indication of CACS, CCTA, and FFR in the diagnosis and screening of CAD.
Figure 2.
Overview of the state-of-the-art application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). This figure summarizes the indication of CCTA in the clinical practice, including (1) the utility of coronary artery calcium score to make the risk stratification, (2) the utility of CCTA for diagnosis and screening, (3) fraction flow reserve-CT and CT perfusion to assess functional assessment of coronary arterial territory. CACS: coronary artery calcium score, CCTA: coronary computed tomography angiography, CAD: coronary artery disease, CVD: cardiovascular disease, FFR: fraction flow reserve
Coronary anomalies by coronary computed tomography angiography
CCTA serves as the most effective noninvasive tool for diagnosing coronary artery anomalies (CAA), achieving greater spatial resolution and 3D reconstruction capabilities, which significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over invasive coronary angiography [33]. It detects CAAs such as anomalies of origin, course, and termination [34], crucial for clinical management, especially in young patients with ischemic symptoms linked to high-risk anatomical features such as interarterial courses, ostial tightness, and acute takeoff angles associated with sudden cardiac death in young athletes [35]. In addition, CCTA has been shown to identify myocardial bridging in 42.8% of cases [33], underscoring its utility in less obvious cases of CAA, which might not result in myocardial ischemia, especially in adults with possible atherosclerotic disease. In such cases, a combination of provocative tests using stress testing with electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, MRI, or myocardial perfusion scanning is recommended in the ESC 2020 guidelines for managing adult congenital heart disease [36].
Coronary computed tomography angiography in acute coronary syndrome
CCTA is increasingly employed in emergency departments for diagnosing non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as documented in the 2023 ESC guidelines [37]. Although not routinely used as a first-line diagnostic tool in acute settings due to its inability to alter inhospital mortality or hospital stay lengths significantly, CCTA can effectively exclude ACS in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms and ambiguous biomarker results [38]. Its high negative predictive value is crucial for ruling out coronary etiologies in acute chest pain scenarios, guiding further diagnostic and therapeutic strategies [39,40]. Moreover, it should be noted that increased levels of high-sensitivity troponin I are not necessarily indicative of coronary artery stenosis [41]. CCTA’s high negative predictive value aids physicians in excluding atherosclerotic causes of myocardial injury, although its utility may be limited in scenarios such as tachycardia, established CAD, prior stents, and extensive coronary artery calcification per the 2023 ESC guidelines due to potential nondiagnostic results.
Coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of vulnerable plaque
Vulnerable plaque evaluation via CCTA offers insights into the biochemical composition of plaques that are at risk of causing acute coronary events. These plaques typically have a low CT attenuation value, ranging from −30 to 60 HU, which indicates a lipid-rich core, compared to fibrous plaques that register between 61 and 149 HU and calcified plaques which appear from 150 to 1300 HU [42]. A key feature in identifying high-risk plaques is the positive remodeling index, where a value >1.1 suggests significant vessel enlargement at the plaque site [43]. Another critical sign is the “napkin-ring sign,” which depicts a plaque with a dense peripheral rim and a low-attenuation core, indicative of a necrotic core surrounded by a fibrous cap. Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that features such as low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, and the napkin-ring sign are associated with increased risk for ACS events [44].
Coronary computed tomography angiography in planning coronary revascularization
In the 2013 Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) revolution trial [45], CCTA was utilized for decision-making in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures. Currently, the SYNTAX I and II scores are accessible online (https://syntaxscore.org/calculator/start.htm) to evaluate the complexity of CAD and assist in selecting the appropriate revascularization method, either PCI or CABG.
Furthermore, CCTA is valuable for preprocedural planning of interventional procedures. Its uses include evaluating plaque in coronary arteries, predicting procedural success for chronic total occlusion PCI through CCTA-derived scores, and identifying coronary lesions that might benefit from additional techniques to enhance stent implantation success by evaluating calcium scores and calcific plaque distribution [46].
In addition, the ongoing FASTTRACK CABG trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04142021) explores the feasibility and safety of planning and executing CABG based on preprocedural CCTA, FFR-CT, and a postoperative 30-day CCTA study to assess the potential of CCTA in evaluating coronary anatomy without invasive coronary angiography [47].
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: MACHINE LEARNING, DOSE REDUCTION, AND PHOTON COUNTING
Machine learning in coronary computed tomography angiography
The application of machine learning and deep learning in CCTA has markedly advanced the field, enhancing both the evaluation and interpretation of imaging data. Deep learning techniques have been applied to automate the quantification of calcified plaque volumes and severity of stenosis, achieving accuracy levels comparable to expert radiologists [48]. Furthermore, machine learning algorithms have facilitated the calculation of calcium scores from single-session contrast-enhanced CCT scans by utilizing virtual noncontrast scans derived from spectral CT imaging [49]. Advances in super-resolution reconstruction techniques have significantly reduced image noise and minimized artifacts associated with calcified plaques [50]. In addition, deep learning has been utilized to generate four-dimensional noise-reduction images, enhancing the visualization of coronary arteries and aiding in the planning of interventional procedures [51]. Predictive models based on deep learning have also been developed to estimate the success rates of PCIs in patients with chronic total occlusions, providing valuable preprocedural information that can guide clinical decisions [52].
Dose reduction in coronary computed tomography angiography
Dose-reduction strategies in CCTA have become a critical focus to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. High-pitch spiral acquisition techniques cover the entire cardiac volume in a single gantry rotation, significantly reducing radiation exposure to as low as 1.7 mSv [53]. Prospective ECG triggering, which synchronizes image acquisition with the mid-diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle when the heart motion is minimal, has also been shown to reduce radiation doses by up to 90% compared to traditional retrospective ECG-gating methods [54,55]. The implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms in image processing further reduces radiation dose by allowing for less noisy image reconstructions from fewer data points, potentially reducing doses by up to 40% [56,57]. Recent advancements in deep-learning image reconstruction have achieved additional dose reductions of up to 43% without compromising image quality [58]. Photon-counting CT technology, which enhances signal detection efficiency and improves contrast resolution, offers promising reductions in radiation dose while enhancing diagnostic capabilities [59].
Photon-counting computed tomography
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), equipped with a revolutionary detector that counts the energy level of each received photon, enables the precise measurement of transmitted spectra [60]. The PCCT detector’s smaller pixel size allows for higher resolution, up to 0.11 mm–25 mm, compared to traditional CT where the resolution is only 0.625 mm [61,62]. It effectively reduces the blooming artifact from calcified plaques or metallic coronary stents [63]. Ongoing prospective studies are expected to further highlight the benefits of PCCT [61,63,64].
CONCLUSION
Over the last two decades, advancements in CT technology have solidified the role of CCT as a pivotal noninvasive diagnostic tool in cardiology. With its high sensitivity for detecting coronary artery stenosis and a robust framework for functional cardiac assessment, CCT stands as a cornerstone in the noninvasive diagnosis and management of cardiac diseases. Innovations such as photon-counting CT and deep learning algorithms have pushed the boundaries further, offering higher-resolution images and significant reductions in radiation exposure. Looking forward, the integration of advanced computational methods and continued technological refinement is expected to expand the utility of CCT, enhancing its diagnostic accuracy and reducing procedural risks. The future of CCT is poised to deliver greater clinical value, influencing both the early detection of cardiovascular diseases and the precision of therapeutic interventions.
Declaration of ethics patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Jong-Kai Hsiao, an editorial board member at Tzu Chi Medical Journal, had no role in the peer review process or decision to publish this article. The other authors declared no conflict of interest in writing this paper.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (TCRD-TPE-106-34, TCRD-TPE-112-04, TCRD-TPE-MOST-112-02, and TCRD-TPE-MOST-109-03). OpenAI has contributed to refining the language and grammar of this manuscript, thereby enhancing its clarity and readability.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kulkarni S, Rumberger JA, Jha S. Electron beam CT: A historical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216:1222–8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kopp AF, Küttner A, Trabold T, Heuschmid M, Schröder S, Claussen CD. MDCT: Cardiology indications. Eur Radiol. 2003;13((Suppl 5)):M102–15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Madaj P, Li D, Nakanishi R, Andreini D, Pontone G, Conte E, et al. Lower radiation dosing in cardiac CT angiography: The CONVERGE registry. J Nucl Med Technol. 2020;48:58–62. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.119.229500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kędzierski B, Macek P, Dziadkowiec-Macek B, Truszkiewicz K, Poręba R, Gać P. Radiation doses in cardiovascular computed tomography. Life (Basel) 2023;13:990. doi: 10.3390/life13040990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.DISCHARGE Trial Group. Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, Rieckmann N, Benedek T, et al. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1591–602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lewis MA, Pascoal A, Keevil SF, Lewis CA. Selecting a CT scanner for cardiac imaging: The heart of the matter. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20160376. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goo HW, Goo JM. Dual-energy CT: New horizon in medical imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18:555–69. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tarkowski P, Czekajska-Chehab E. Dual-energy heart CT: Beyond better angiography-review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5193. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kay FU. Dual-energy CT and coronary imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10:1090–107. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2020.04.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sheta HM, Möller S, Heinsen LJ, Nieman K, Thomsen T, Egstrup K, et al. Characteristics of culprit lesion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and improvement of diagnostic utility using dual energy cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;37:1781–8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02141-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Albrecht MH, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Spandorfer A, Eid M, De Santis D, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart current and future status. Eur J Radiol. 2018;105:110–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abdelkarim A, Roy SK, Kinninger A, Salek A, Baranski O, Andreini D, et al. Evaluation of image quality for high heart rates for coronary computed tomographic angiography with advancement in CT technology: The CONVERGE registry. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10:404. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, Conte E, Guglielmo M, Annoni A, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography carried out with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in patients with high heart rate. Int J Cardiol. 2018;257:325–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fan L, Zhang J, Xu D, Dong Z, Li X, Zhang L. CTCA image quality improvement by using snapshot freeze technique under prospective and retrospective electrocardiographic gating. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:202–6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsumoto Y, Fujioka C, Yokomachi K, Kitera N, Nishimaru E, Kiguchi M, et al. Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT. Sci Rep. 2023;13:3636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30786-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun J, Okerlund D, Cao Y, Li H, Zhu Y, Li J, et al. Further improving image quality of cardiovascular computed tomography angiography for children with high heart rates using second-generation motion correction algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020;44:790–5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Golub IS, Termeie OG, Kristo S, Schroeder LP, Lakshmanan S, Shafter AM, et al. Major global coronary artery calcium guidelines. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e563–95. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Golub I, Lakshmanan S, Dahal S, Budoff MJ. Utilizing coronary artery calcium to guide statin use. Atherosclerosis. 2021;326:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ajufo E, Ayers CR, Vigen R, Joshi PH, Rohatgi A, de Lemos JA, et al. Value of coronary artery calcium scanning in association with the net benefit of aspirin in primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:179–87. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Orringer CE, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ, Goldberg RB, Gill EA, et al. The national lipid association scientific statement on coronary artery calcium scoring to guide preventive strategies for ASCVD risk reduction. J Clin Lipidol. 2021;15:33–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Branch KR, Haley RD, Bittencourt MS, Patel AR, Hulten E, Blankstein R. Myocardial computed tomography perfusion. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:452–62. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.06.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tashakkor AY, Nicolaou S, Leipsic J, Mancini GB. The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28:413–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ramjattan NA, Lala V, Kousa O, Shams P, Makaryus AN. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Coronary CT angiography. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nørgaard BL, Jensen JM, Blanke P, Sand NP, Rabbat M, Leipsic J. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: The game changer in noninvasive testing. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19:112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0923-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nørgaard BL, Gormsen LC, Bøtker HE, Parner E, Nielsen LH, Mathiassen ON, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging versus computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with intermediate-range coronary lesions: Influence on downstream diagnostic workflows and invasive angiography findings. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005587. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burch RA, Siddiqui TA, Tou LC, Turner KB, Umair M. The cost effectiveness of coronary CT angiography and the effective utilization of CT-fractional flow reserve in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10:25. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10010025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tækker Madsen K, Veien KT, Larsen P, Husain M, Deibjerg L, Junker A, et al. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in-stable angina: Association with recurrent chest pain. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23:1511–9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Madsen KT, Nørgaard BL, Øvrehus KA, Jensen JM, Parner E, Grove EL, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on 3-year outcomes in patients with stable angina. Radiology. 2023;308:e230524. doi: 10.1148/radiol.230524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Budde RP, Nous FM, Roest S, Constantinescu AA, Nieman K, Brugts JJ, et al. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) for functional coronary artery evaluation in the follow-up of patients after heart transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:1843–52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08246-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ghadri JR, Kazakauskaite E, Braunschweig S, Burger IA, Frank M, Fiechter M, et al. Congenital coronary anomalies detected by coronary computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baltaxe HA, Wixson D. The incidence of congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries in the adult population. Radiology. 1977;122:47–52. doi: 10.1148/122.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Han J, Lalario A, Merro E, Sinagra G, Sharma S, Papadakis M, et al. Sudden cardiac death in athletes: Facts and fallacies. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023;10:68. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nie C, Zhu C, Yang Q, Xiao M, Meng Y, Wang S. Myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: A matched case-control study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21:382. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02185-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, Goodacre S, Oatey K, O’Brien R, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;374:n2106. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:299–308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee KK, Bularga A, O’Brien R, Ferry AV, Doudesis D, Fujisawa T, et al. Troponin-guided coronary computed tomographic angiography after exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1407–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Linde JJ, Hove JD, Sørgaard M, Kelbæk H, Jensen GB, Kühl JT, et al. Long-term clinical impact of coronary CT angiography in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: The randomized controlled CATCH trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1404–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kumar V, Weerakoon S, Dey AK, Earls JP, Katz RJ, Reiner JS, et al. The evolving role of coronary CT angiography in acute coronary syndromes. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021;15:384–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dey D, Schepis T, Marwan M, Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Achenbach S. Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: Comparison with intravascular US. Radiology. 2010;257:516–22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gauss S, Achenbach S, Pflederer T, Schuhbäck A, Daniel WG, Marwan M. Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: A head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Heart. 2011;97:991–7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2011.223024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Otsuka K, Fukuda S, Tanaka A, Nakanishi K, Taguchi H, Yoshikawa J, et al. Napkin-ring sign on coronary CT angiography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:448–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Andreini D, Modolo R, Katagiri Y, Mushtaq S, Sonck J, Collet C, et al. Impact of Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography on heart team treatment decision-making in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Insights from the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007607. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Andreini D, Collet C, Leipsic J, Nieman K, Bittencurt M, De Mey J, et al. Pre-procedural planning of coronary revascularization by cardiac computed tomography: An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. EuroIntervention. 2022;18:e872–87. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kawashima H, Pompilio G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, Mushtaq S, Ferrari E, et al. Safety and feasibility evaluation of planning and execution of surgical revascularisation solely based on coronary CTA and FFR (CT) in patients with complex coronary artery disease: Study protocol of the FASTTRACK CABG study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e038152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, Killekar A, Matsumoto H, Kwiecinski J, et al. Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: An international multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e256–65. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00022-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mu D, Bai J, Chen W, Yu H, Liang J, Yin K, et al. Calcium scoring at coronary CT angiography using deep learning. Radiology. 2022;302:309–16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nagayama Y, Emoto T, Kato Y, Kidoh M, Oda S, Sakabe D, et al. Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2023;33:8488–500. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09888-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kobayashi T, Nishii T, Umehara K, Ota J, Ohta Y, Fukuda T, et al. Deep learning-based noise reduction for coronary CT angiography: Using four-dimensional noise-reduction images as the ground truth. Acta Radiol. 2023;64:1831–40. doi: 10.1177/02841851221141656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou Z, Gao Y, Zhang W, Zhang N, Wang H, Wang R, et al. Deep learning-based prediction of percutaneous recanalization in chronic total occlusion using coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2023;309:e231149. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, Pflederer T, Bruder H, Allmendinger T, et al. High-pitch spiral acquisition: A new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:117–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun Z. Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: An effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:28–37. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.02.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: Comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:431–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482072192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Den Harder AM, Willemink MJ, De Ruiter QM, De Jong PA, Schilham AM, Krestin GP, et al. Dose reduction with iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150068. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Seibert JA. Iterative reconstruction: How it works, how to apply it. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44((Suppl 3)):431–9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Benz DC, Ersözlü S, Mojon FL, Messerli M, Mitulla AK, Ciancone D, et al. Radiation dose reduction with deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:2620–8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08367-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pinos D, Griffith J, 3rd, Emrich T, Schoepf UJ, O’Doherty J, Zsarnoczay E, et al. Intra-individual comparison of image quality of the coronary arteries between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems. Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Si-Mohamed S, Bar-Ness D, Sigovan M, Cormode DP, Coulon P, Coche E, et al. Review of an initial experience with an experimental spectral photon-counting computed tomography system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2017;873:27–35. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Si-Mohamed SA, Boccalini S, Lacombe H, Diaw A, Varasteh M, Rodesch PA, et al. Coronary CT angiography with photon-counting CT: First-in-human results. Radiology. 2022;303:303–13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rajendran K, Petersilka M, Henning A, Shanblatt E, Marsh J, Jr, Thorne J, et al. Full field-of-view, high-resolution, photon-counting detector CT: Technical assessment and initial patient experience. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66 doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac155e. 10.1088/1361-6560/ac155e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hagar MT, Soschynski M, Saffar R, Rau A, Taron J, Weiss J, et al. Accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting CT for detecting coronary artery disease in a high-risk population. Radiology. 2023;307:e223305. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Halfmann MC, Bockius S, Emrich T, Hell M, Schoepf UJ, Laux GS, et al. Ultrahigh-spatial-resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography of coronary artery disease for stenosis assessment. Radiology. 2024;310:e231956. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


