Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 28;33(5):570–579. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01740-6

Table 1.

Characteristics of included articles.

Reference First Author & Year of Publication Methods Participants* Sample Size Output(s) Objective(s) of Public Engagement
Patients
[58] Hoffman-Andrews et al. [58] Interviews US; Adults with a diagnosis of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) N = 17 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices
[37] Hollister et al. [37] Survey & Focus groups US; Individuals (18 + ) with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), parents of individuals with SCD N = 87 Various outputs Hearing a variety of voices
[30] Snure Beckman et al. [30]a Interviews US; Parents of living or deceased children diagnosed with full or mosaic trisomy 21, 18, or 13 N = 27 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices
[31] Elliott et al. [31]b Interviews US; Parents of living or deceased children diagnosed with full or mosaic trisomy 21, 18, or 13 N = 27 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices/ Informing policy making
[60] Van Dijke et al. [60] Interviews The Netherlands; High-risk couples (different inheritance patterns and having a living or deceased child with a genetic condition) or one of the parents being a carrier of an inherited autosomal dominant disorder. N = 25 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices/ Informing policy making
[61] Geuverink et al. [61] Interviews The Netherlands; Carriers of various inherited autosomal dominant disorders N = 10 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices
[59] Neuhausser et al. [59] Survey US; Patients at a university affiliated infertility practice N = 172 (in 2021) & 469 (in 2018) Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
Public
[29] McCaughey et al. [29]a Survey 185 countries N = 12,562 Various outputs Insight into public attitude forming
[28] McCaughey et al. [28]b Survey 185 countries N = 3935 Various outputs Insight into public attitude forming/ Monitor or increase public knowledge or support/ Informing policy making
[36] Scheufele et al. [36]a Survey US N = 1600 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
[35] Howell et al. [35]b Survey US N = 1484 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
[34] Eichmeier et al. [34]c Survey US N = 1600 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
[55] Gaskell et al. [55] Survey

Austria, Denmark, Germany, Hungary,

Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, UK (EEA-10 countries) & the United States

N = 11,716 Various outputs Monitor or increase public knowledge or support/ Informing policy making
[41] Weisberg et al. [41] Survey US N = 2493 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming/ Monitor or increase public knowledge or support/ Informing policy making
[47] Hendriks et al. [47] Survey The Netherlands N = 1013 Various outputs Insight into public attitude forming
[50] Treleaven and Tuch [50] Focus groups Australia N = 46 Level of acceptance Informing policy making
[51] Critchley et al. [51] Survey Australia N = 1004 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
[42] Riggan et al. [42] Focus groups US N = 50 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices/ Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[38] Kaur [38] Survey UK N = 521 Various outputs Hearing a variety of voices
[56] Jedwab et al. [56] Survey 67 countries; Majority from US, Australia, Canada, UK, N = 1537 Level of acceptance Hearing a variety of voices/ Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[39] Schuijff et al. [39] Survey & Focus groups The Netherlands N = 30 Various outputs Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[48] Van Dijke et al. [48] Survey The Netherlands N = 1136 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[54] So et al. [54] Survey US & Canada N = 400 Various outputs Insight into public attitude forming
[43] McFadden et al. [43] Focus groups US N = 64 In-depth reasoning Insight into public attitude forming
[44] Chen and Zhang [44] Survey US N = 2105 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming
[57] Busch et al. [57] Survey Canada, US, Austria, Germany, Italy N = 3698 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[49] Houtman et al. [49] Survey The Netherlands N = 2795 Various outputs Hearing a variety of voices/ Informing policy making
[52] Thaldar et al. [52] Survey & Deliberations South Africa N = 29 Various outputs Informing policy making
[32] Akatsuka et al. [32]a Survey Japan N = 4424 Level of acceptance Hearing a variety of voices
[33] Sawai et al. [33]b Survey Japan N = 4424 Level of acceptance Hearing a variety of voices/ Insight into public attitude forming
[45] Halstead et al. [45] Survey US N = 4726 Level of acceptance Insight into public attitude forming/ Informing policy making
[53] Macall et al. [53] Survey Costa Rica N = 1096 Level of acceptance Hearing a variety of voices
[40] Jibrilla et al. [40] Survey Nigeria N = 188 Level of acceptance Informing policy making
[46] Nelson et al. [46] Focus groups US N = 32 In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices/ Informing policy making
Public & Patients
[62] Uchiyama et al. [62] Survey Japan; General public & adult patients who indicated that their disease conditions were related to their “genetic makeup” N = 10,881 (general public) N = 1044 (patients) Level of acceptance Hearing a variety of voices/ Insight into public attitude forming
[63] Van Baalen et al. [63] Dialogues The Netherlands; General public & (child) patients and their family members

N = 804 (general public)

N = 20 ((child) patients and family)

In-depth reasoning Hearing a variety of voices/ Informing policy making

* “experts” not included.

abcEngagement studies based on the same sample: Three engagement studies were reported on two times, and one engagement study was reported on three times answering different research questions.