ABSTRACT
In this study, we describe the combined effects of bedaquiline (BDQ) and the natural product curcumin (CUR) on Mycobacterium abscessus. In both in vitro and in vivo experiments, CUR enhanced BDQ’s inhibitory effect. This combination reduced M. abscessus survival under nutrient-deprived, hypoxic, and acidic conditions, accelerated ATP depletion, mitigated BDQ-induced respiratory compensation, and effectively improved infection outcomes in both normal and immunosuppressed mice. Metabolomics analysis revealed that adding CUR to BDQ exacerbated BDQ-dependent downregulation of purine and pyrimidine metabolism and amino acid synthesis. Thus, BDQ-CUR combination therapy could potentially be applied to treat M. abscessus infections.
IMPORTANCE
Mycobacterium abscessus is an emerging pathogen that causes pulmonary infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients. It exhibits natural resistance to many anti-tuberculosis drugs, posing significant challenges for both patients and physicians, thereby raising the need for innovative drug discovery. Here, we describe the combined effects of bedaquiline (BDQ) and curcumin (CUR) on M. abscessus. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that CUR enhances the inhibitory effect of BDQ. Additionally, we investigated the synergistic effects at the metabolic level. Thus, these findings highlight the potential of BDQ-CUR combination therapy against M. abscessus infections.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, bedaquiline, curcumin, synergy, combination
INTRODUCTION
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) cause chronic opportunistic pulmonary infections in susceptible populations (1). Mycobacterium abscessus is a prevalent pathogen among NTM species (2, 3). Treatment options are limited because of natural resistance to many commonly used antimicrobials. Current therapies, requiring 18–24 months of at least three drugs (4), yield poor outcomes; only 50% of M. abscessus and 70% of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) patients achieve prolonged culture conversion (5). This underscores the urgent need to develop new drugs for treating NTM infections.
Bedaquiline (BDQ) is an antibiotic approved for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). It inhibits the proton pump of mycobacterial ATP synthase, causing ATP depletion, unstable pH homeostasis, and cell death (6, 7). BDQ exhibits moderate-to-high in vitro activity against NTM (8–10) and demonstrates bacteriostatic effects in monotherapy in mouse models of Mycobacterium avium and M. abscessus infections (11, 12). According to Philley et al. (13), BDQ offers potential therapeutic benefits for patients with severe MAC and M. abscessus lung disease, making it a promising treatment option for these infections. Although adding BDQ to failing regimens for MAC and M. abscessus infections improves symptoms, it neither prevents microbiological failure nor inhibits the emergence of BDQ resistance (13, 14). Therefore, it is necessary to combine BDQ with other drugs to enhance its efficacy and reduce the dosage of antibacterial agents.
Drug repurposing is a promising strategy to accelerate drug discovery. Curcumin (CUR), the principal curcuminoid derived from the plant Curcuma longa, has been extensively studied for its biological and chemical properties. CUR exhibits a broad spectrum of pharmacological properties, including antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antitumor activities. Pharmacological studies have suggested that CUR exerts significant protective effects against TB (15). Kotwal et al. (16) explored the effects of plant-based natural products on the pharmacokinetics of BDQ and found that CUR increased the plasma concentration of BDQ when used in combination. This increase may be attributed to CUR’s ability to improve BDQ absorption and slow its metabolism by inhibiting P-GP-mediated efflux. However, data on the effectiveness of the BDQ-CUR combination against M. abscessus are limited, especially in vivo. However, the mechanisms underlying the antibacterial activity of BDQ-CUR remain largely unknown. In this study, we evaluated the BDQ-CUR drug combination against M. abscessus both in vitro and in vivo and investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms. These findings present a novel treatment approach for M. abscessus.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Curcumin enhances the efficacy of bedaquiline against M. abscessus in vitro
Time-kill assays were performed using the M. abscessus ATCC 19977 strain. As shown in Fig. 1A, the combination of CUR and BDQ produced sustained bacteriostatic effects. CUR monotherapy did not exhibit bactericidal effects. Although BDQ monotherapy (4 µg/mL) initially inhibited bacterial growth, regrowth was observed within 14 days. These results demonstrate that CUR effectively inhibits BDQ’s in vitro growth inhibition against M. abscessus. This supports previous research showing that CUR acts not only as a potential antibiotic resistance breaker but also as an effective adjuvant therapy for BDQ (17).
Fig 1.
Curcumin enhances bedaquiline’s efficacy against M. abscessus in vitro. (A) Time kill kinetics: growth curves of M. abscessus treated with BDQ (1 or 4 µg/mL) and CUR (500 µg/mL), individually or in combination, compared to a DMSO-treated control, monitored over 28 days. Data represent mean ± SD from triplicate cultures. (B) Starvation model: survival of M. abscessus under nutrient-limited conditions treated with BDQ (0.5 or 0.25 µg/mL) and CUR (500 µg/mL), individually or in combination, monitored over 10 days. (C) Hypoxia state: survival of M. abscessus in hypoxic conditions treated with the same concentrations as in panel B, monitored over 10 days. (D–G) Acidic stress: survival of M. abscessus at pH levels 6.0, 5.5, 5.0, and 4.5 under the same treatments as in panel B, monitored over 10 days. (H) Macrophage infections: viability of M. abscessus in RAW264.7 macrophages treated with BDQ (1 µg/mL), CUR (500 µg/mL), or their combination (BDQ 1 µg/mL + CUR 500 µg/mL). CFU counts were determined at 1 and 3 days post-treatment.
In vitro evaluation of BDQ-CUR combination
Similar to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. abscessus evades destruction by macrophages and neutrophils after colonization, resulting in granuloma formation and survival under harsh conditions, such as acidic environments, nutrient deprivation, and hypoxia (18, 19). Previous studies have shown that the sensitivity of M. tuberculosis to new candidate drugs varies depending on the physiological state of the cells (active or inactive) (20, 21). Specifically, this includes the non-replicating physiological state of M. abscessus under oxygen- and nutrient-deficient (PBS or single-nutrient) conditions (22) and its cellular state under acidic conditions (23). Accurately replicating these in vivo conditions in vitro is crucial for studying the infection process and evaluating bactericidal activity. Studies have indicated that under nutrient deprivation, BDQ exhibits bactericidal effects against M. abscessus (24). We assessed the bactericidal effect of the BDQ-CUR combination on M. abscessus by simulating a non-replicative state using a starvation model. The results showed that the BDQ-CUR combination significantly reduced the survival rate of M. abscessus compared to BDQ alone, with a CFU/mL decrease of 0.8 log10 (Fig. 1B). Additionally, we used the Wayne model and a pH range from 6.0 to 4.5 (decreasing by 0.5 increments) to evaluate the survival of M. abscessus under hypoxic and acidic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, the BDQ-CUR combination effectively reduced M. abscessus survival, with a CFU/mL decrease of 0.75 log10 (Fig. 1C). M. abscessus exhibited high acid tolerance; although BDQ alone had some inhibitory effects, the combination with CUR was more effective, reducing growth by 0.8–1.25 log10 (Fig. 1D through G). The ability of the BDQ-CUR combination to maintain bactericidal activity under extreme conditions is particularly important and may improve therapeutic strategies against prolonged M. abscessus infections.
M. abscessus can resist intracellular destruction and establish infections, prompting us to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the BDQ-CUR combination in RAW264.7 macrophages. Within 3 days, the CFU/mL value of the BDQ-CUR combination in macrophages was reduced by at least 1 log10 compared with that of BDQ or CUR alone (Fig. 1H). Although CUR lacked in vitro inhibitory or bactericidal effects against M. abscessus, it exhibited superior antibacterial activity within macrophages compared to BDQ at an early stage. This was consistent with Bai et al.’s findings (25) in an in vitro human macrophage infection model, where CUR not only induced autophagy and apoptosis but also activated NF-κB, accelerating the clearance of M. tuberculosis. However, in the absence of macrophages, 50 µM CUR had no impact on M. tuberculosis growth (26–28). Therefore, it is crucial to identify drugs that exert antibacterial activity by modulating the host immune response. Such a strategy can reduce bacterial survival pressure and potentially delay the emergence of resistance to single drugs or combination therapies.
In vivo evaluation of BDQ-CUR combination
Although the anti-M. abscessus effects of CUR and the CUR-BDQ combination in macrophages are promising, their protective effects in host organisms have not yet been confirmed in animal models. Kim and colleagues (29) demonstrated that C57BL/6 mice infected with M. abscessus ATCC 19977 could be a useful model for testing antimicrobials during infection development. As shown in Fig. 2A timeline and Fig. 2B results, BDQ-CUR could reduce the bacterial load in the lungs of normal C57BL/6 mice by day 7 of treatment. Compared to the untreated groups, BDQ-CUR (6/6), BDQ (3/6), and CUR (2/6) treatments reduced CFU counts by more than an order of magnitude (Table 1). HE staining revealed a reduction in inflammatory pathology in the lungs of BDQ-CUR-treated mice compared to untreated mice (Fig. 2C). Although the difference in lung bacterial load between the combined treatment group and BDQ alone was not statistically significant, the lung bacterial load showed a trend of 0.5 log10 unit reduction, and pathological sections showed significant improvement (Fig. 2B and C).
Fig 2.
Curcumin enhances bedaquiline’s efficacy against M. abscessus in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mouse models. (A) Schematic of the experimental procedure in immunocompetent mice: mice were intranasally infected with ~1 × 109 CFU of M. abscessus. Six mice were sacrificed 1 day post-infection to determine the initial bacterial load, and the remaining mice were divided into four treatment groups: control (DMSO), CUR, BDQ, and CUR-BDQ. Drug treatment was administered via gavage, and mice were sacrificed at 3 and 7 days post-treatment (4 and 8 days post-infection) to evaluate lung bacterial loads. (B) Lung bacterial loads in immunocompetent mice treated once daily for 7 days with 30 mg BDQ/kg of body weight, 200 mg CUR/kg of body weight, or CUR-BDQ (30 mg BDQ/kg of body weight + 200 mg CUR/kg of body weight), or DMSO. (C). H&E staining of lung tissues from immunocompetent mice 7 days post-treatment. (D) Schematic of the experimental procedure in immunosuppressed mice: neutropenia was induced via intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg of body weight) 4 days and 1 day prior to infection. Mice were then intranasally infected with ~1 × 107 CFU of M. abscessus. Four mice were sacrificed on day 3 post-infection to determine initial bacterial loads in the lung and spleen. The remaining mice were divided into the same four treatment groups as the immunocompetent model. Drug treatment was administered via gavage, and mice were sacrificed at 3 and 7 days post-treatment (6 and 10 days post-infection) to evaluate lung and spleen bacterial loads. (E and F) Lung and spleen bacterial loads in immunosuppressed mice treated once daily for 7 days with 30 mg BDQ/kg of body weight, 200 mg CUR/kg of body weight, CUR-BDQ (30 mg BDQ/kg of body weight +200 mg CUR/kg of body weight), or DMSO. (G) H&E staining of lung and spleen tissues from immunosuppressed mice 7 days post-treatment.
TABLE 1.
Summary of lung and spleen bacterial loads in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed mice after treatment (spleen samples collected only in immunosuppressed mice)
Mouse model | Organ | Treatment groups | No. of improved infected mice (3 dpi)a | Mean difference from untreated group (log10)b | Mean difference from initial infection (log10) | No. of improved infected mice (7 dpi)a | Mean difference from untreated group (log10)b | Mean difference from initial infection (log10)b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Immunology normal | Lungs | CUR | 0/6 | 0.74 | – | 2/6 | 0.67 | – |
BDQ | 1/6 | 0.54 | – | 3/6 | 1.23 | – | ||
CUR-BDQ | 3/6 | 1.25c | – | 6/6 | 1.77 | – | ||
Immunology suppressed | Lungs | CUR | 0/3 | −0.01 | −1.06 | 0/4 | 0.68 | −0.72 |
BDQ | 0/3 | 0.13 | −0.91 | 0/4 | 1.36 | −0.03 | ||
CUR-BDQ | 0/3 | 1.03 | −0.02 | 4/4 | 3.22 | 1.83 | ||
Spleen | CUR | 0/3 | 0.03 | −2.61 | 0/4 | 1.52 | −1.31 | |
BDQ | 0/3 | 0.27 | −2.37 | 0/4 | 1.32 | −1.51 | ||
CUR-BDQ | 0/3 | 1.46 | −1.18 | 1/4 | 3.54 | 0.71 |
Immunology normal mice model: for mice treated with BDQ, CUR, or the CUR-BDQ combination, No. of infection improved mice refers to the number of mice whose individual bacterial load decreased by at least 1 log10 unit compared to the average bacterial load of the control group, indicating an improvement in infection. Immunology suppressed mice model: in this model, No. of infection improved mice refers to the number of mice whose individual bacterial load decreased by at least 1 log10 unit compared to the average bacterial load of the initial infection group, indicating an improvement in infection.
Mean difference from the untreated group or initial infection: calculated as the average bacterial load of the control or initial infection group minus the average bacterial load of the treatment group. A positive value indicates a reduction in the treatment group’s bacterial load compared to the control or initial infection group; a negative value indicates an increase. "–" indicates that, in the immune normal mouse model, no comparison was made with the initial infection group.
Bold values indicate the CUR-BDQ combination group, which is highlighted to emphasize its greater effectiveness in reducing bacterial load.
Furthermore, similar to the intranasal infection model, immunodeficient mice develop a persistent infection that reaches the spleen (systemic) (30, 31). We evaluated the effect of the combination using immunodeficient mice injected with cyclophosphamide (Fig. 2D) (32, 33). The results showed that after 3 days of treatment, the bacterial load in the BDQ-CUR groups was the same as the initial infection, while in other treatment groups (both the BDQ and CUR groups), the bacterial load significantly increased (Fig. 2E). The bacterial load in the spleen on day 3 in the combination group was also lower than that in the other groups, although it showed a slight increase relative to the initial infection (Fig. 2F). On day 7 of the combination treatment, compared with the BDQ group, both the lung and spleen bacterial loads significantly decreased by nearly 2 log10 CFU (Fig. 2E and F). Similarly, compared to the initial infection, the combination treatment resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial loads by nearly 2 log10 CFU in the lungs (4/4) and spleen (1/4) (Table 1). Pathological analysis on day 7 showed a reduction in the number of lymphocytes in these lesions, with moderate to minimal localized/focal histological features of inflammation observed in the BDQ-CUR groups. Severe and multifocal inflammation marked by the presence of lymphocytes and macrophages was observed in the lungs and spleen of the untreated group, in addition to extensive tissue damage (Fig. 2G). These findings support the reliability and effectiveness of the BDQ-CUR combination. Combination therapy has mitigated lung damage and drug toxicity from bacterial infections and may prevent the need to increase BDQ doses to combat drug-resistant M. abscessus (23, 34). Dose-escalating studies have indicated the safety of curcumin at doses as high as 12 g/day for over 3 months in humans (35). Previous results have shown that treatment with 16 or 32 µg/mL of CUR reduced the bacillary lung burden and improved survival rates in mice infected with drug-sensitive M. tuberculosis H37Rv (36, 37). Our results further confirm that CUR is a potential antimycobacterial drug against M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus infection. CUR may inhibit intracellular bacterial growth and promote the clearance of drug-sensitive strains by inducing caspase-3-dependent apoptosis and autophagy. This has been demonstrated in differentiated THP-1 human monocytes, primary human alveolar macrophages, and Raw 264.7 cells infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv or MDR clinical isolates (25, 38). In addition, CUR may directly affect mycobacterial metabolic pathways, which are crucial for mycobacterial pathogenicity and host persistence (39). In summary, we demonstrated the efficacy of CUR in treating pulmonary infections in mice, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive agent to BDQ.
Influence of BDQ-CUR on M. abscessus ATP flux and respiration
As BDQ exerts its antibacterial effects by targeting the ATP synthase c subunit and inhibiting ATP synthesis, we investigated the effect of BDQ alone and in combination with CUR on ATP flux in M. abscessus. Our results showed that BDQ significantly reduced ATP flux in M. abscessus, with the most pronounced depletion observed in the BDQ-CUR combination group, demonstrating a clear dose-dependent effect (Fig. 3A). Molecular docking studies have identified NAD-dependent DNA ligase as one of the predicted targets of CUR (15). To explore this interaction, we assessed the effect of CUR on NAD+ levels and found that CUR significantly increased intracellular NAD+ levels and the NAD+/NADH ratio (Fig. 3B). NAD(H) homeostasis plays a crucial role in drug susceptibility and infection processes in mycobacteria (40–42). While NAD+ depletion can induce lethal low-energy states, excessive NAD+ accumulation elevates ROS levels, which can also be toxic. Oxidative stressors like H2O2 and HClO sharply increase NAD+ levels and the NAD+/NADH ratio, leading to lethal effects. Similarly, clofazimine treatment initiates an over-driven ROS cycle pathway, leading to an increase in NAD+ and ROS, effectively killing mycobacterium (43–46). These challenges are often mitigated by mycobacteria through metabolic adaptations to withstand such stresses (43). M. abscessus, in particular, exhibits greater adaptability to ROS enrichment (47, 48). This adaptability may explain the lack of CUR-mediated inhibition observed in our study, as CUR-induced alterations in NAD(H) homeostasis appear insufficient to significantly impact its growth. Additionally, previous studies have reported a strong correlation between the bactericidal activity of ETC-targeted drug combinations and an increased intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratio (49–51). Consistent with this, our results showed that the combination treatment led to a threefold increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio compared to the BDQ treatment alone. This increase was driven by NADH upregulation in the combination group (Fig. 3C and D). NAD(H) plays a critical role as a respiratory cofactor. Its imbalance initially triggers metabolic adaptation but ultimately leads to redox failure and cellular dysfunction (52–54). CUR enhanced BDQ disruption of redox balance and energy metabolism in M. abscessus, providing insights into the synergy of this drug combination.
Fig 3.
Impact of BDQ and CUR on ATP, NAD(H) metabolism, and cellular respiration in M. abscessus. (A) ATP content analysis in M. abscessus treated with BDQ (10 µg/mL, 10× MIC), CUR (200 and 500 µg/mL), or their combination for 4 hours. (B) Changes in NAD+, NADH levels, and NAD+/NADH ratio in M. abscessus treated with CUR at two concentrations (200 and 500 µg/mL) for 4 hours. (C and D) Changes in NADH levels and NADH/NAD+ ratio in M. abscessus treated with BDQ (10 µg/mL), CUR (200 µg/mL), or CUR-BDQ combination (10 µg/mL BDQ + 200 µg/mL CUR) for 4 hours. (E) Schematic of the extracellular flux (XF) assay used to measure oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and related bioenergetic parameters. Drug compounds were introduced through ports, and dissolved O2 and pH were continuously monitored. (F and G) OCR changes in M. abscessus upon exposure to BDQ (10× and 100× MIC) and CUR (200 and 500 µg/mL). (H and I) Sequential drug administration effects on OCR in M. abscessus: panel H shows CUR addition followed by BDQ, and panel I shows BDQ addition followed by CUR. Data were analyzed using Seahorse XF Wave software, with SD calculated from four biological replicates.
Furthermore, to directly understand the respiratory effects of BDQ and CUR in M. abscessuss, both alone and in combination, we employed extracellular flux (XF) analysis to measure the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of M. abscessus in real time as a marker of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (Fig. 3E). We observed that the OCR of the BDQ-treated M. abscessus increased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3F). Lamprecht et al. (55) reported that the BDQ-induced increase in respiration in M. tuberculosis was a specific response to ATP depletion in an attempt to restore energy homeostasis. As CUR affects the ETC electron flux, we anticipated a reduction in respiration. As expected, the OCR of CUR-treated cells decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3G). Therefore, we investigated whether CUR could inhibit the feedback compensation mechanism induced by BDQ. Our findings indicated that the BDQ-CUR combination significantly reduced OCR (Fig. 3H and I). Thus, the BDQ-CUR combination effectively inhibited M. abscessus growth by suppressing oxidative phosphorylation, thereby abolishing ATP production.
Global metabolic response of M. abscessus to BDQ-CUR
To elucidate the downstream effects of ETC perturbation by BDQ, CUR, or their combination, we employed a metabolomics approach. Using the UPLC-Q-TOF/MS system, we analyzed perturbations in the metabolite spectrum of M. abscessus, considering the intricate interplay between multiple feedback loops and the flexibility of the ETC, which may result in complex and unexpected responses. In the PLSDA model, all replicates in each group were grouped into the same cluster. The CUR group and the untreated group (negative control, NC) showed clear aggregation behavior, whereas the BDQ-CUR (BC) group was more similar to the BDQ group (Fig. 4A). Among them, 37 metabolites were significantly downregulated after CUR treatment, 80 metabolites after BDQ treatment, and 97 metabolites after BC treatment (Fig. 4B). There were 37 differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) that were common to all three groups, which mainly participated in purine and pyrimidine metabolism (Fig. 4C and D). This observation is consistent with previous studies in which purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis were the most recurrently affected metabolites among different drug treatments, playing an important role in the early drug-produced stress response. Moreover, KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEMs in the BC and BDQ groups were mainly involved in carbohydrate and energy metabolism, such as the citrate cycle (TCA cycle), pentose phosphate, propanoate pathway, and oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 4D).
Fig 4.
Metabolic responses of M. abscessus to BDQ-CUR combination treatment. (A) PLS-DA analysis of metabolite profiles in M. abscessus treated with DMSO (NC), BDQ, CUR, and their combination (BC). (B) Volcano plots comparing metabolite expression in M. abscessus under BDQ, CUR, and BC treatments to the NC group. Significant differential metabolites (DEMs) are highlighted (P ≤ 0.05, |fold change| ≥ 1.5), with blue dots representing downregulated metabolites and red dots representing upregulated metabolites. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEMs identified in M. abscessus under BDQ, CUR, and BC treatments. (D) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEMs under BDQ, CUR, and BC treatments compared to the NC group. Key pathways are visualized (P ≤ 0.001). (E) Bar graph depicting log2 fold changes of key metabolites under BC treatment compared to the NC and single-drug treatments (BDQ or CUR). (F) Network diagram visualizing key DEMs, with blue nodes indicating downregulated metabolites. Node size reflects connectivity. (G) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis highlighting common pathways between BC and single-drug treatments (BDQ or CUR).
We next explored the trends in the DEMs between the BDQ-CUR combination and BDQ alone. These trends were consistent but more pronounced in the BC group. Specifically, we observed that dGDP, ADP, UDP-glucose, alanine, guanosine, and glutamine were downregulated by more than fourfold in the BC group compared to those in the BDQ group (Fig. 4E). This substantial downregulation of key metabolic intermediates disrupted nucleotide, carbohydrate, amino acid, and energy metabolism pathways (Fig. 4F and G). Our previous study had identified glutamine synthetase as a metabolic vulnerability factor in M. tuberculosis in response to BDQ, with a strong correlation between glutamine and ATP levels (56). Furthermore, we confirmed that M. abscessus treated with BDQ-CUR combination exhibited a low metabolic state, reduced respiration rate, and reduced macromolecular synthesis (Fig. 5). This observation aligns with other reports indicating that MTB remodels its metabolism to compensate for reduced ATP levels, thereby facilitating redox balance (57–60). Mackenzie et al. (49) found that BDQ reprogrammed M. tuberculosis metabolism, rendering it vulnerable to the genetic disruption of glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, leading to rapid sterilization when combined with OXPHOS inhibition. This mechanism may explain why the combination of BDQ and CUR effectively inhibits the growth of metabolically fragile strains of M. abscessus. Moreover, the inhibition of ATP synthesis by BDQ leads to the differential inhibition of various ATP-dependent metabolic processes. This “extension mechanism” aligns with emerging concepts that modifying the primary targets of antibiotics triggers a cascade of events within bacteria, ultimately disrupting cellular processes (61). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the combination of CUR and BDQ enhanced these effects.
Fig 5.
Metabolic effects induced by BDQ-CUR combination in M. abscessus. This schematic illustrates the distinct and combined effects of BDQ and CUR on the metabolic state of M. abscessus. BDQ primarily targets ATP synthase, altering respiratory chain activity and enhancing cellular respiration as a compensatory mechanism. CUR treatment is associated with increased NAD+ levels and an elevated NAD+/NADH ratio, which contribute to impaired cellular respiration. The BDQ-CUR combination disrupts these compensatory mechanisms, leading to significant reductions in ATP production and metabolic activity, as well as an increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio. This synergistic effect enhances BDQ’s mechanism of action by targeting key metabolic pathways critical to its efficacy, including the ATP-ADP-AMP cycle, nitrogen metabolism (glutamine and glutamate), amino acid synthesis, nucleotide synthesis, and central carbon metabolism, significantly extending the antimycobacterial efficacy of BDQ. This figure was created using BioRender.com.
Conclusion
In summary, our research indicates that the combination of BDQ and CUR not only inhibits the growth of M. abscessus but also exhibits potential therapeutic effects. These effects include killing dormant bacteria, enhancing bacterial clearance from the body, reducing bacterial ATP synthesis and cell respiration, and causing significant metabolic reprogramming and cessation of macromolecular synthesis. Although these results are promising, further clinical studies are essential to validate the safety and efficacy of combination therapy in humans. This study provides a crucial theoretical foundation for the development of more effective treatment strategies for M. abscessus infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, media, and reagents
M. abscessus (laboratory ATCC 19977 stains, resuscitated from a frozen stock) was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (BD, USA) supplemented with 10% acid–albumin–dextrose–catalase or on 7H10 agar containing 0.5% glycerol and 10% oleic acid–albumin–dextrose–catalase (BD, USA). Cultures were grown at 37℃ under aerobic conditions. The compounds bedaquiline, curcumin, and kanamycin (KM) were purchased from RHAWN Co., Ltd (Shanghai). BDQ and CUR were dissolved in a solution containing 20% (vol/vol) DMSO in water, while KM was dissolved in ultrapure water. All solutions were sterilized using a 0.22 µm filter before use.
Time-kill curve assays
Time-kill curve assays were conducted using M. abscessus ATCC 19977. An overnight culture of ATCC 19977 was diluted in 10 mL of 7H9 broth to reach a final concentration of approximately 107 CFU/mL. BDQ at 4 or 1 µg/mL and CUR at 500 µg/mL were added individually or in combination. The same volume of 20% DMSO was used as a control. Bacterial survival was monitored by collecting samples at the indicated time points (0, 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days) for CFU determination.
Evaluation of drug combination effects in dormancy M. abscessus
M. abscessus stock cultures were grown in 7H9 medium to an OD600 of around 1. The bacterial suspensions were washed three times in PBS with 0.05% Tween 80 as follows: cultures were centrifuged at 1,900 rpm for 10 minutes, the supernatant was removed, and cells were resuspended to the original volume in PBS with 0.05% Tween 80. After the third wash, the resuspended bacteria were incubated under nutrient starvation conditions at 37°C for the indicated duration. Bacterial survival was monitored by removing samples and culturing for CFU determination at 5 and 10 days.
For acidic pH stress, the pH of 7H9 medium was adjusted to 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, or 6.0 using HCl and then filter sterilized with a 2 µm filter. After exposure to acid stress conditions, samples were diluted and plated on 7H10 agar for bacterial enumeration.
For hypoxic dormancy, a modified Wayne’s model, as described previously, was used (62). Methylene blue was added to 7H9 medium as an oxygen indicator, and flasks were sealed with rubber stoppers to prevent oxygen access. Cultures were incubated under hypoxic conditions for 5 or 10 days, after which the flasks were opened, and the cultures were serially diluted and plated on 7H10 agar to determine CFU/mL.
Under all experimental conditions, BDQ at 0.5 or 0.25 µg/mL and CUR at 500 µg/mL were added individually or in combination. The same volume of 20% DMSO was used as a control.
Cellular ATP level and NAD(H) measurement in M. abscessus
Intracellular ATP and NAD(H) levels in M. abscessus ATCC 19977 were measured using the Enhanced ATP Assay Kit and the NAD+/NADH Assay Kit (both from Beyotime, China). Bacteria were cultured in 7H9 broth to an OD600 of approximately 1 and then diluted to a final concentration of 106 CFU/mL. Cultures were treated with CUR (500 or 200 µg/mL), BDQ (10 µg/mL), their combination, and 20% DMSO and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. After incubation, cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4°C to collect bacterial pellets. For ATP measurement, the pellets were lysed with ATP lysis buffer and mechanically disrupted with 0.1 mm silica beads using a tissue homogenizer (Precellys, France) at 4°C. For NAD(H) measurement, the pellets were resuspended in NAD+/NADH extraction buffer and disrupted under the same conditions. After disruption, the lysates were centrifuged, and the supernatants were collected. ATP levels were quantified by mixing the supernatant with ATP detection solution in a 96-well plate, incubating at room temperature for 2 minutes, and measuring luminescence using a BioTek microplate reader (Agilent, USA). NAD(H) levels were determined by adding 20 µL of supernatant and 90 µL of working solution to a 96-well plate, incubating at 37°C for 20 minutes, and measuring absorbance at 450 nm using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent analyzer (AMR-100, Allsheng, China). All measurements were performed in three independent biological replicates.
Measurement of oxygen consumption rate in M. abscessus
Overnight-cultured M. abscessus cells were centrifuged and washed twice with minimal medium lacking carbon sources. The cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.0015 in a carbon-free 7H9 medium. A total of 180 µL of the diluted cell suspension was added to XF cell culture microplates pre-coated with poly-D-lysine to promote cell adhesion. Baseline oxygen consumption rate was taken prior to antibiotic treatment using a Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer (Agilent, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Baseline OCR was measured over three cycles, each lasting 4 minutes. For the metabolic assay, glucose was automatically injected into each well at a concentration of 2 mg/mL using the A ports of the sensor cartridge. Antibiotic treatments, including BDQ (100 and 10 µg/mL), CUR (500 and 200 µg/mL), 20% DMSO (as a vehicle control), and carbon-free 7H9 medium (as a negative control), were administered sequentially through the remaining ports. The OCR was then measured for four cycles of 7 minutes each following each antibiotic injection.
LC-MS-based metabolomics analysis of M. abscessus
Metabolomic profiling of M. abscessus was conducted following established methodologies (49). Bacteria were treated with BDQ (10 µg/mL), CUR (500 µg/mL), the combination of CUR-BDQ (1 µg/m L + 500 µg/mL), or the negative control (equal volume of 20% DMSO) for 1 day. Metabolites were separated using a Vanquish UHPLC system coupled with a Q Exactive Plus Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Metabolite identification was performed using TraceFinder software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). DEMs were identified based on an absolute fold change (|fold change|) of ≥1.5 and P-value ≤ 0.05. Statistical analyses and data visualization were executed using R software (version 3.6.3). The raw liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data have been deposited in the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database under the identifier MTBLS10177.
Evaluation of drug combination treatment effects of M. abscessus infection in RAW 264.7 macrophages
RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded in 6-well culture plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well. Before infection, the cells were washed three times with DMEM to remove nonadherent cells. The macrophages were then infected with M. abscessus at a multiplicity of infection of 1 for 4 hours. After infection, the cells were washed twice with prewarmed 1× PBS and treated with DMEM medium containing 500 µg/mL KM for 1 hour to eliminate non-internalized bacteria. The cells were then washed with 1 mL PBS, and 2 mL DMEM medium containing BDQ (1 µg/mL), CUR (500 µg/mL), a combination of BDQ (1 µg/mL) and CUR (500 µg/mL), or the same volume of 20% DMSO was added to the respective wells. The cells were then incubated for 24 or 72 hours. At the specified time points, the cells were lysed using sterile PBS containing 0.025% SDS. The lysates were serially diluted and plated on 7H10 agar plates in triplicate. CFU was calculated to determine the bacterial load.
In vivo treatment evaluation
M. abscessus infection was prepared by diluting the bacterial culture with PBS to a final volume of 20 µL per mouse. A total of 54 immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice were intranasally inoculated with M. abscessus (∼1 × 109 CFU/mouse). After 1 day, the infected mice were divided randomly into four treatment groups as follows: Group 1 received 20% DMSO only as a control. Group 2 was treated with BDQ at a dose of 30 mg/kg of body weight. Group 3 received CUR at a dose of 200 mg/kg of body weight. Group 4 was treated with a combination of BDQ (30 mg/kg of body weight) and CUR (200 mg/kg of body weight). All treatments were prepared in 20% DMSO and administered by daily oral gavage for 1 week. Each mouse received 100 µL of the drug via intragastric administration.
On day 1 post-infection, six mice were sacrificed to determine the initial bacterial load in the lungs. On days 3 or 7 post-treatment, six mice from each group were sacrificed. The upper lobes of the right lungs were dissected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours, and sectioned for histological analysis using H&E staining. The remaining lung tissues were homogenized, serial diluted 10-fold, and plated on 7H10 agar. Bacterial load in the lungs was determined by counting colonies after 5 days of incubation at 37°C.
For the immunosuppression mouse infection, studies were conducted to mimic respiratory infection as described previously (33). Briefly, 32 6-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were rendered neutropenic by intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide at 150 mg/kg of body weight, administered 4 and 1 days prior to infection. The mice were then infected intranasally with ∼1 × 107 CFU of M. abscessus. On day 3 post-infection, four mice were sacrificed to determine the initial bacterial load in the lungs and spleens. The remaining 28 infected mice were divided randomly into the same four treatment groups as the immunocompetent mice. Three or four mice from each group were sacrificed on days 3 or 7 post-treatment. Lungs and spleens were collected for CFU count and histological analysis using H&E staining.
Statistical analysis
All data were presented as the mean ± SD from a minimum of three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism software version 8.0.1. Differences were considered statistically significant at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. The notation “ns” indicates a lack of statistical significance.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Prof. Kyu Y. Rhee (Weill Cornell Medical College) and all members of the Wang lab for critical discussion and document revision.
This research was kindly supported by a grant from the National Key Research and Development Plans of China (No. 2021YFD1800401) to Z.W., National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070128) to Z.W., and Shanghai Biomedical Science and Technology Support Special Project (No. 21S11900200) to Z.W.
Contributor Information
Zhe Wang, Email: wangz@sjtu.edu.cn.
Kayvan Zainabadi, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Shail Mehta, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gabriela Hädrich, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria.
ETHICS APPROVAL
All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The animal study protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02295-24.
Fig. S1 to S6; Table S1.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K, ATS Mycobacterial Diseases Subcommittee, American Thoracic Society, Infectious Disease Society of America . 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Ängeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P, Beylis N, Boeree MJ, Cacho J, Chihota V, et al. 2013. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J 42:1604–1613. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00149212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Stout JE, Koh W-J, Yew WW. 2016. Update on pulmonary disease due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Int J Infect Dis 45:123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Floto RA, Olivier KN, Saiman L, Daley CL, Herrmann J-L, Nick JA, Noone PG, Bilton D, Corris P, Gibson RL, Hempstead SE, Koetz K, Sabadosa KA, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Smyth AR, van Ingen J, Wallace RJ, Winthrop KL, Marshall BC, Haworth CS. 2016. US cystic fibrosis foundation and European cystic fibrosis society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis: executive summary. Thorax 71:88–90. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. van Ingen J, Ferro BE, Hoefsloot W, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. 2013. Drug treatment of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in HIV-negative patients: the evidence. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 11:1065–1077. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2013.830413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rao M, Streur TL, Aldwell FE, Cook GM. 2001. Intracellular pH regulation by Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Microbiology (Reading, Engl) 147:1017–1024. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-4-1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Andries K, Verhasselt P, Guillemont J, Göhlmann HWH, Neefs J-M, Winkler H, Van Gestel J, Timmerman P, Zhu M, Lee E, Williams P, de Chaffoy D, Huitric E, Hoffner S, Cambau E, Truffot-Pernot C, Lounis N, Jarlier V. 2005. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 307:223–227. doi: 10.1126/science.1106753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brown-Elliott BA, Philley JV, Griffith DE, Thakkar F, Wallace RJ. 2017. In vitro susceptibility testing of bedaquiline against Mycobacterium avium complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01798-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01798-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Huitric E, Verhasselt P, Andries K, Hoffner SE. 2007. In vitro antimycobacterial spectrum of a diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:4202–4204. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00181-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Li B, Ye M, Guo Q, Zhang Z, Yang S, Ma W, Yu F, Chu H. 2018. Determination of MIC distribution and mechanisms of decreased susceptibility to bedaquiline among clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00175–18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00175-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lerat I, Cambau E, Roth Dit Bettoni R, Gaillard J-L, Jarlier V, Truffot C, Veziris N. 2014. In vivo evaluation of antibiotic activity against Mycobacterium abscessus . J Infect Dis 209:905–912. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lounis N, Gevers T, Van den Berg J, Vranckx L, Andries K. 2009. ATP synthase inhibition of Mycobacterium avium is not bactericidal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4927–4929. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00689-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Philley JV, Wallace RJ, Benwill JL, Taskar V, Brown-Elliott BA, Thakkar F, Aksamit TR, Griffith DE. 2015. Preliminary results of bedaquiline as salvage therapy for patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest 148:499–506. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Alexander DC, Vasireddy R, Vasireddy S, Philley JV, Brown-Elliott BA, Perry BJ, Griffith DE, Benwill JL, Cameron ADS, Wallace RJ. 2017. Emergence of mmpT5 variants during bedaquiline treatment of Mycobacterium intracellulare lung disease. J Clin Microbiol 55:574–584. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02087-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Barua N, Buragohain AK. 2021. Therapeutic potential of curcumin as an antimycobacterial agent. Biomolecules 11:1278. doi: 10.3390/biom11091278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kotwal P, Dogra A, Sharma A, Bhatt S, Gour A, Sharma S, Wazir P, Singh PP, Kumar A, Nandi U. 2020. Effect of natural phenolics on pharmacokinetic modulation of bedaquiline in rat to assess the likelihood of potential food-drug interaction. J Agric Food Chem 68:1257–1265. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Marini E, Di Giulio M, Magi G, Di Lodovico S, Cimarelli ME, Brenciani A, Nostro A, Cellini L, Facinelli B. 2018. Curcumin, an antibiotic resistance breaker against a multiresistant clinical isolate of Mycobacterium abscessus. Phytother Res 32:488–495. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rottman M, Catherinot E, Hochedez P, Emile J-F, Casanova J-L, Gaillard J-L, Soudais C. 2007. Importance of T cells, gamma interferon, and tumor necrosis factor in immune control of the rapid grower Mycobacterium abscessus in C57BL/6 mice. Infect Immun 75:5898–5907. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00014-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bernut A, Nguyen-Chi M, Halloum I, Herrmann J-L, Lutfalla G, Kremer L. 2016. Mycobacterium abscessus-Induced Granuloma formation is strictly dependent on TNF signaling and neutrophil trafficking. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005986. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pieterman ED, Sarink MJ, Sala C, Cole ST, de Steenwinkel JEM, Bax HI. 2020. Advanced quantification methods to improve the 18b dormancy model for assessing the activity of tuberculosis drugs in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00280-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00280-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Salina EG, Ryabova O, Vocat A, Nikonenko B, Cole ST, Makarov V. 2017. New 1-hydroxy-2-thiopyridine derivatives active against both replicating and dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Chemother 23:794–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yam Y-K, Alvarez N, Go M-L, Dick T. 2020. Extreme drug tolerance of Mycobacterium abscessus “persisters”. Front Microbiol 11:359. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lanni A, Borroni E, Iacobino A, Russo C, Gentile L, Fattorini L, Giannoni F. 2022. Activity of drug combinations against Mycobacterium abscessus grown in aerobic and hypoxic conditions. Microorganisms 10:1421. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mulyukin AL, Recchia D, Kostrikina NA, Artyukhina MV, Martini BA, Stamilla A, Degiacomi G, Salina EG. 2023. Distinct effects of moxifloxacin and bedaquiline on growing and “non-culturable” Mycobacterium abscessus. Microorganisms 11:2690. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Bai X, Oberley-Deegan RE, Bai A, Ovrutsky AR, Kinney WH, Weaver M, Zhang G, Honda JR, Chan ED. 2016. Curcumin enhances human macrophage control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Respirology 21:951–957. doi: 10.1111/resp.12762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shariq M, Quadir N, Sharma N, Singh J, Sheikh JA, Khubaib M, Hasnain SE, Ehtesham NZ. 2021. Mycobacterium tuberculosis RipA dampens TLR4-mediated host protective response using a multi-pronged approach involving autophagy, apoptosis, metabolic repurposing, and immune modulation. Front Immunol 12:636644. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Arnett E, Weaver AM, Woodyard KC, Montoya MJ, Li M, Hoang KV, Hayhurst A, Azad AK, Schlesinger LS. 2018. PPARγ is critical for Mycobacterium tuberculosis induction of Mcl-1 and limitation of human macrophage apoptosis. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007100. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Bah A, Sanicas M, Nigou J, Guilhot C, Astarie-Dequeker C, Vergne I. 2020. The lipid virulence factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exert multilayered control over autophagy-related pathways in infected human macrophages. Cells 9:666. doi: 10.3390/cells9030666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kim TS, Choe JH, Kim YJ, Yang C-S, Kwon H-J, Jeong J, Kim G, Park DE, Jo E-K, Cho Y-L, Jang J. 2017. Activity of LCB01-0371, a novel oxazolidinone, against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02752-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02752-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ganapathy US, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2021. Epetraborole is active against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0115621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01156-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dick T, Shin SJ, Koh W-J, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M. 2020. Rifabutin Is Active against Mycobacterium abscessus in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01943–19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01943-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sun Y, Zhang K, Delos Santos M, Pee CJE, Yang Y, Kang M, Shin SJ, Chan-Park MB, Pethe K. 2024. An optimized cyclophosphamide-treated mouse model of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 68:e0152023. doi: 10.1128/aac.01520-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang S, Zou Y, Guo Q, Chen J, Xu L, Wan X, Zhang Z, Li B, Chu H. 2020. AR-12 exhibits direct and host-targeted antibacterial activity toward Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00236-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00236-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gao T, Yao C, Shang Y, Su R, Zhang X, Ren W, Li S, Shu W, Pang Y, Li Q. 2023. Antimicrobial effect of oxazolidinones and its synergistic effect with bedaquiline against Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Infect Drug Resist 16:279–287. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S395750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. 2013. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J 15:195–218. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9432-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lara-Espinosa JV, Arce-Aceves MF, López-Torres MO, Lozano-Ordaz V, Mata-Espinosa D, Barrios-Payán J, Silva-Islas CA, Maldonado PD, Marquina-Castillo B, Hernández-Pando R. 2022. Effect of curcumin in experimental pulmonary tuberculosis: antimycobacterial activity in the lungs and anti-inflammatory effect in the brain. Int J Mol Sci 23:1964. doi: 10.3390/ijms23041964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Marathe SA, Dasgupta I, Gnanadhas DP, Chakravortty D. 2011. Multifaceted roles of curcumin: two sides of a coin! Expert Opin Biol Ther 11:1485–1499. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2011.623124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gupta PK, Kulkarni S, Rajan R. 2013. Inhibition of intracellular survival of multi drug resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages by curcumin. Open Antimicrob Agents 4:1–5. doi: 10.2174/1876518101304010001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Singh AK, Karaulia P, Yadav P, Narender T, Singh SP, Sashidhara KV, Pandey AK, Chopra S, Dasgupta A. 2016. Identification of lipid metabolism-targeting compounds active against drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 7:26–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pacl HT, Chinta KC, Reddy VP, Nadeem S, Sevalkar RR, Nargan K, Lumamba K, Naidoo T, Glasgow JN, Agarwal A, Steyn AJC. 2023. NAD(H) homeostasis underlies host protection mediated by glycolytic myeloid cells in tuberculosis. Nat Commun 14:5472. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40545-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Gao R, Wei W, Hassan BH, Li J, Deng J, Feng Y. n.d. A single regulator NrtR controls bacterial NAD+ homeostasis via its acetylation. Elife 8:e51603. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Freire DM, Gutierrez C, Garza-Garcia A, Grabowska AD, Sala AJ, Ariyachaokun K, Panikova T, Beckham KSH, Colom A, Pogenberg V, Cianci M, Tuukkanen A, Boudehen Y-M, Peixoto A, Botella L, Svergun DI, Schnappinger D, Schneider TR, Genevaux P, de Carvalho LPS, Wilmanns M, Parret AHA, Neyrolles O. 2019. An NAD+ phosphorylase toxin triggers Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell death. Mol Cell 73:1282–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bhat SA, Iqbal IK, Kumar A. 2016. Imaging the NADH:NAD+ homeostasis for understanding the metabolic response of Mycobacterium to physiologically relevant stresses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:145. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Yano T, Kassovska-Bratinova S, Teh JS, Winkler J, Sullivan K, Isaacs A, Schechter NM, Rubin H. 2011. Reduction of clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH:quinone oxidoreductase. J Biol Chem 286:10276–10287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.200501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Mashele SA, Steel HC, Matjokotja MT, Rasehlo SSM, Anderson R, Cholo MC. 2022. Assessment of the efficacy of clofazimine alone and in combination with primary agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 29:343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Yano T, Kassovska-Bratinova S, Teh JS, Winkler J, Sullivan K, Isaacs A, Schechter NM, Rubin H. 2011. Reduction OF clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH:quinone oxidoreductase: A pathway for the generation of bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 286:10276–10287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.200501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Pereira MMR, de Oliveira FM, da Costa AC, Junqueira-Kipnis AP, Kipnis A. 2023. Ferritin from Mycobacterium abscessus is involved in resistance to antibiotics and oxidative stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107:2577–2595. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12420-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tan Z, Fan J, He S, Zhang Z, Chu H. 2023. sRNA21, a novel small RNA, protects Mycobacterium abscessus against oxidative stress. J Gene Med 25:e3492. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Mackenzie JS, Lamprecht DA, Asmal R, Adamson JH, Borah K, Beste DJV, Lee BS, Pethe K, Rousseau S, Krieger I, Sacchettini JC, Glasgow JN, Steyn AJC. 2020. Bedaquiline reprograms central metabolism to reveal glycolytic vulnerability in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Nat Commun 11:6092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19959-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lamprecht DA, Finin PM, Rahman MdA, Cumming BM, Russell SL, Jonnala SR, Adamson JH, Steyn AJC. 2016. Turning the respiratory flexibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against itself. Nat Commun 7:12393. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Koul A, Vranckx L, Dhar N, Göhlmann HWH, Özdemir E, Neefs J-M, Schulz M, Lu P, Mørtz E, McKinney JD, Andries K, Bald D. 2014. Delayed bactericidal response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to bedaquiline involves remodelling of bacterial metabolism. Nat Commun 5:3369. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sharma R, Hartman TE, Beites T, Kim J-H, Eoh H, Engelhart CA, Zhu L, Wilson DJ, Aldrich CC, Ehrt S, Rhee KY, Schnappinger D. 2023. Metabolically distinct roles of NAD synthetase and NAD kinase define the essentiality of NAD and NADP in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. MBio 14:e0034023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00340-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rodionova IA, Schuster BM, Guinn KM, Sorci L, Scott DA, Li X, Kheterpal I, Shoen C, Cynamon M, Locher C, Rubin EJ, Osterman AL. 2014. Metabolic and bactericidal effects of targeted suppression of NadD and NadE enzymes in mycobacteria. MBio 5:e00747-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00747-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Cook GM, Hards K, Vilchèze C, Hartman T, Berney M. 2014. Energetics of respiration and oxidative phosphorylation in mycobacteria. Microbiol Spectr 2. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MGM2-0015-2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lamprecht DA, Finin PM, Rahman MdA, Cumming BM, Russell SL, Jonnala SR, Adamson JH, Steyn AJC. 2016. Turning the respiratory flexibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against itself. Nat Commun 7:1–14. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wang Z, Soni V, Marriner G, Kaneko T, Boshoff HIM, Barry CE, Rhee KY. 2019. Mode-of-action profiling reveals glutamine synthetase as a collateral metabolic vulnerability of M. tuberculosis to bedaquiline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:19646–19651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907946116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Nguyen TQ, Hanh BTB, Jeon S, Heo BE, Park Y, Choudhary A, Moon C, Jang J. 2022. Synergistic effect of Q203 combined with PBTZ169 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0044822. doi: 10.1128/aac.00448-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kim S, Louie A, Drusano GL, Almoslem M, Kim S, Myrick J, Nole J, Duncanson B, Peloquin CA, Scanga CA, Yamada W, Neely M, Schmidt S. 2022. Evaluating the effect of clofazimine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis given alone or in combination with pretomanid, bedaquiline or linezolid. Int J Antimicrob Agents 59:106509. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Lindman M, Dick T. 2019. Bedaquiline eliminates bactericidal activity of β-Lactams against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00827-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00827-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ruth MM, Sangen JJN, Remmers K, Pennings LJ, Svensson E, Aarnoutse RE, Zweijpfenning SMH, Hoefsloot W, Kuipers S, Magis-Escurra C, Wertheim HFL, van Ingen J. 2019. A bedaquiline/clofazimine combination regimen might add activity to the treatment of clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:935–943. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Dick T, Young D. 2011. How antibacterials really work: impact on drug discovery. Future Microbiol 6:603–604. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Xie W, Luo D, Soni V, Wang Z. 2025. Functional characterization of MMAR_1296 in Mycobacterium marinum and its potential as a vaccine candidate. Vaccine (Auckl) 48:126720. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S6; Table S1.
An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.