Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2025 Mar 31;13(5):e02897-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02897-24

Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in molar-incisor-hypomineralization vs healthy age-matched controls

Marina Jung 1,✉,#, Sébastien Boutin 2,3,4,#, Marlinde M Simon 1, Cornelia Frese 1
Editor: Cassio Almeida-da-Silva5
PMCID: PMC12054143  PMID: 40162761

ABSTRACT

Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) is one of the most challenging dental diseases in children. While the association of oral microbiomes with caries and periodontitis has been studied thoroughly, limited data on the microbial composition in MIH and its clinical significance exist. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the supragingival plaque microbiome between children and adolescents affected by MIH and a healthy age-matched control group. Ninety-five patients aged 7–17 years were recruited at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital. The final sample included 29 participants with a confirmed diagnosis of MIH, treated preventively and restoratively, and 35 orally healthy controls. Clinical data were obtained, and supragingival plaque samples were collected using OMNIgene ORAL OMR-110 (DNA Genotek Inc.), followed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The microbiome composition was analyzed using α-diversity (Shannon index) and evenness (Pielou index), with group differences assessed using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and MaAsLin2. The overall microbiome composition showed mostly similarities between both groups (PERMANOVA: R² = 0.019, P-value = 0.287), indicating no major dysbiosis. However, a significant decrease in α-diversity and evenness was observed with an increasing number of MIH-affected teeth. Pronounced positive correlations were found between ASV0055 (Streptococcus spp.), caries experience, and MIH severity. ASV0100 (Mannheimia sp.) increased significantly with the increasing number of MIH-affected teeth, whereas ASV0053 (Bergeyella sp.) decreased with higher caries experience. In summary, the oral microbiome of children and adolescents with MIH exhibits no significant differences from healthy children and adolescents of the same age group. Depending on MIH severity, the presence of early plaque-forming species and cariogenic biofilm may increase, requiring intensive, tailored preventive care and appropriate restorative treatment to achieve microbial homeostasis.

IMPORTANCE

Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) represents a significant burden for affected children and adolescents, playing an increasingly important role in pediatric dentistry worldwide. Despite its high global prevalence, data on the microbiome of MIH patients remains limited. This study is the first to compare the oral microbiome composition of MIH patients with a healthy control group, making a significant contribution to pediatric dentistry and microbiology. Our results indicate that the oral microbiome of children with MIH is similar to that of healthy children of the same age. Although this structural anomaly predisposes patients to caries, effective preventive and restorative treatments can help maintain microbial homeostasis. However, MIH-affected children remain high-risk patients, as the disease severity may reduce microbial diversity. Furthermore, the increased abundance of Streptococcus spp. in MIH patients indicates a higher caries susceptibility, emphasizing the need for targeted dental care focusing on plaque control and topical fluoride use.

KEYWORDS: oral microbiome, dental plaque, human microbiome, Streptococcus

INTRODUCTION

Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) is a challenging dental condition that occurs in children worldwide. It is a developmental enamel defect of systemic origin that affects the first permanent molars and incisors (1). Depending on its severity, MIH can significantly impact children’s dental health and quality of life (2), making research into the causes of this condition particularly important. Its etiology has not yet been fully established. Associations with birth complications and early childhood illnesses have been reported. Recent findings indicate a potential role of genetic and epigenetic factors (3). Nowadays, MIH is believed to be one of the most common non-carious diseases of the tooth structure in children and adolescents (4). Its global prevalence varies from 2.4%–40.2% (5, 6), with recent meta-analyses reporting average rates of 14.2% (7) and 13.5% (8).

Clinically, MIH manifests as demarcated creamy-white to yellow-brownish opacities, with or without posteruptive enamel breakdowns. In severe cases, hypomineralization can lead to such extensive defects that teeth cannot be preserved and, even at a young age, must be extracted (1). The hypomineralized enamel has lower calcium and phosphorus but higher protein content. Therefore, it exhibits increased porosity, significantly reducing the mechanical strength of affected teeth (9). The rough and damaged surfaces lead to plaque accumulation, making daily oral hygiene more challenging, which significantly increases the individual caries risk (10).

Besides caries, tooth hypersensitivity is another characteristic symptom of MIH. It often leads to avoiding certain foods, reduced compliance with maintaining oral hygiene (11), and an increased risk of tooth decay (10). These issues may complicate treatment, requiring a complex approach (12). Therapeutic options for MIH with mild hypersensitivity typically include preventive measures using topical fluoride products (toothpaste, gels, and varnishes) and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate products. In severe cases, direct and indirect restorations with composites, ceramics, or prefabricated steel crowns, as well as tooth extractions, are indicated (13, 14).

The microbiome and its relevance are gaining increasing interest in research, with oral diseases such as caries and periodontitis already well studied. The oral microbiome is highly diverse, consisting of bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protozoa, with approximately 700 species inhabiting the oral cavity (15, 16), making it the second-largest microbial community in the human body after the gastrointestinal tract (17). Numerous studies indicate that changes in microbiological homeostasis play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of various oral and systemic diseases (18, 19). Despite its high prevalence worldwide, data on the microbiome of MIH patients remain limited. Until today, only one study has examined the bacterial composition of supragingival plaque in MIH-affected teeth of 25 children (20). While a reduction in bacterial diversity is typically associated with pathological oral conditions (21), Hernandez et al. found that MIH-affected teeth showed a higher microbiome diversity compared to sound teeth. However, this study was conducted in a split-mouth design. Therefore, we aimed to compare the composition of the oral microbiome in children and adolescents with MIH to an age-matched healthy cohort. Furthermore, in the MIH group, associations between clinical parameters—such as caries experience (using the decayed, missing, filled, and teeth index [DMF-T]), MIH severity, number of MIH-affected teeth, gingival health indices (including plaque control record [PCR] and gingival bleeding index [GBI])—and the composition of the oral microbiome were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital. The study received ethical approval from the local ethics committee (S-550/2021) and was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00030206). All participants and their legal guardians provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

A total of 95 patients were recruited between January 2022 and March 2024 in our department, with 45 in the MIH group and 50 in the control group. Clinical examinations and plaque sample collections were carried out during a single visit. The inclusion criteria for both groups included male and female participants aged 7–17 who could maintain regular oral hygiene. To fulfill this criterion, effective plaque control in the home environment, performed by the child themselves or with parental support, had to be ensured. Participants in the MIH group had to be diagnosed with MIH, while the control group consisted of orally healthy participants with sound teeth and no caries experience. Exclusion criteria included the presence of severe or rare diseases, syndromic conditions, or infantile cerebral palsy, as these conditions could impair the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene and affect the composition of the oral microbiome, as well as the intake of antibiotics in the last 2 weeks. Specific dietary habits, individual tooth brushing methods/techniques and duration, or socioeconomic factors were not assessed. Regarding the use of fluoride, the official recommendations for children and adolescents to use fluoride toothpaste (1,450 ppm F from the age of 6) and a highly concentrated fluoride gel once a week were applied (22).

In the MIH group, 45 individuals were eligible, and 35 agreed to participate, underwent clinical examinations, and had samples collected. In the control group, 50 individuals initially agreed to participate, of whom six were excluded during the oral examination due to the detection of structural defects (n = 1), restored teeth (n = 3), or active carious lesions (n = 2), resulting in 44 participants.

During a comprehensive clinical oral examination by professional dentists, the dental status was documented, including the MIH assessment according to the European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry criteria (23) and severity grading using the MIH treatment need index (MIH-TNI) (24). Tooth sensitivity was evaluated using the Schiff cold air sensitivity scale (SCASS) (25), and caries experience was recorded via the mixed DMF-index (dmft/DMFT; lower-case letters for the deciduous teeth and upper-case letters for the permanent teeth) according to World Health Organization basic methods (26). Additionally, the PCR (27) and GBI (28) were measured in the MIH group.

Sampling

Sampling of the supragingival plaque was performed using OMNIgene ORAL OMR-110 (DNA Genotek Inc.) at least 1 hour after eating. Participants and their parents/legal guardians were instructed to abstain from brushing their teeth prior to the appointment. The last tooth brushing at home took place the evening before. Using the swab provided in the kit, a small amount of supragingival plaque was collected from the gingival margin of MIH-affected teeth. In the control group, the supragingival plaque was collected analogously in the molar region of the maxilla. The acquired plaque was placed into the collection tube containing stabilizing liquid and stored at room temperature (15°C–25°C) until further processing.

DNA extraction

DNA extractions were performed using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Samples were pretreated with 8 µL Proteinase K (RNA Purification Kit, Lucigen Corp., Middleton, WI) followed by a 15-second vortex and incubation at 50°C for 1 hour. After purification following the manufacturer’s protocol, 50 µL of nuclease-free water was added to the column, and the tubes were left to stand for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 1 minute to elute the DNA.

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Initially, DNA was amplified using universal bacterial primers targeting the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, with both forward and reverse primers being used. Each primer was uniquely barcoded to match the sequences to their respective samples. The PCR mixture was composed of Q5 High-Fidelity 1× Master Mix (New England Biolabs GmbH, Germany) along with 0.5 µM of each primer, 2 µL of DNA, and sterile water, resulting in a 25 µL final volume. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 30 amplification cycles (94°C for 45 seconds, 50°C for 60 seconds, and 72°C for 90 seconds), and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes (Primus 25, Peqlab Biotechnologie GmbH, Germany or FlexCycler2, Analytik Jena AG). Negative controls were performed simultaneously using sterile water as a template to monitor and control contamination. Positive controls from a mock community (HM-782D) were included to assess the PCR and sequencing error rates. The PCR products were checked for amplicon presence through agarose gel electrophoresis (2%) and underwent subsequent purification using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of the products were assessed using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany) and the Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Böblingen, Germany). In the final step, sequencing adapters were ligated to the library, followed by paired-end sequencing on a 250-cycle Illumina MiSeq system. Due to low-quality DNA, some samples did not provide libraries or sequencing failed, resulting in 29 MIH group and 35 control samples.

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were performed with SPSS, Version 24.0 (29). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the characteristics of the study population. The 16S data were analyzed using R3.1.4 with the R package Dada2 (30). The raw sequence data were processed using Dada2 to produce amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) with the following parameters: no ambiguities (N) allowed, one error per read allowed, and truncation of the reads at the first position with a quality score of <2. Reads were merged as contigs and checked for chimeras with the default parameters (30). The read counts of each ASV were then used to create an ASV table, and the sequences were classified using the Silva database v138.1. These data were merged into a phyloseq object in R adding the metadata. No negative controls produced reliable amplicons, and the mock community positive control only produced amplicons assigned to the nine expected species, so we did not decontaminate our data set. For each sample, a rarefaction curve was drawn to check that the coverage was correct. The bacterial community was characterized by calculating α-diversity (Shannon index), richness (number of observed ASVs), evenness (Pielou index), and dominance (relative abundance of the most abundant ASV), as well as β-diversity (Morisita-Horn distance) using the microbiome package.

A PERMANOVA was performed to assess the statistical significance of differences between the two sample groups and the influence of various clinical parameters on microbial structure. MaAsLin2 (31) was used for multivariable association modeling to identify differentially abundant species between test and control groups, with group (MIH vs control) and the number ofMIH-affected as fixed effects. Correlations between specific ASVs, the microbiota indexes, and quantitative clinical parameters were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation for ranked, scored, or measured clinical data. The results were graphically summarized in a correlation-based network (Spearman’s ρ > 0.45 or ρ < −0.45, P-value adjusted < 0.05). Overall P-values were interpreted as purely descriptive and considered significant if they were ≤0.05. We used the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure in order to calculate the false discovery rate and the P-value adjusted.

RESULTS

Study-cohort characteristics and clinical parameters are presented in Table 1. A total of 79 samples were collected from both the MIH and control groups. However, 15 samples could not be amplified because of the insufficient DNA amount after extraction. The final data set comprised 29 participants in the MIH group (mean age 11.3 ± 3.1 years) and 35 in the control group (mean age 10.4 ± 2.1 years). Among the MIH group, the average number of MIH-affected teeth was 6.8 ± 2.9. More than half (62.1%) had a most severe MIH-TNI of 4 (4a, 4b, or 4c), characterized by both hypersensitivity and enamel breakdowns. One-third (34.5%) had the most severe MIH-TNI of 2 (2a, 2b, or 2c), with enamel breakdown but without tooth hypersensitivity. Overall, 47.2% of the affected teeth were restored. Furthermore, the mean GBI and PCR were 2.7% ± 4.0% and 42.6% ± 14.5%, respectively. With special regard to the caries experience, children in the MIH group had an average dmft/DMFT of 4.0 ± 2.4 (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study populationa

Variable MIH (n = 29) Controls (n = 35)
Mean ± SD
(range)
n (%) Mean ± SD
(range)
n (%)
Age (years) 11.3 ± 3.1
(7.3–16.6)
10.4 ± 2.1
(7.0–14.8)
Sex
 Female 9 (31.0) 15 (42.9)
 Male 20 (69.0) 20 (57.1)
DMF index (dmft/DMFT) 4.0 ± 2.4
(0.0–11.0)
0.0 ± 0.0
(0–0)
GBI (%) 2.7 ± 4.0
(0.0–18.0)
NA
PCR (%) 42.6 ± 14.5
(23.0–74.0)
NA
Number of MIH-affected teeth 6.8 ± 2.9
(2.0–12.0)
0.0 ± 0.0
(0–0)
Number of restorations (of MIH-affected teeth) 3.2 ± 2.3
(0.0–11.0)
93 (47.2) 0.0 ± 0.0
(0–0)
0
Number of extracted teeth (MIH affected) 0.4 ± 1.1
(0.0–4.0)
11 (5.6) 0.0 ± 0.0
(0–0)
0
Most severe SCASS NA
 SCASS 0 10 (34.5)
 SCASS 1 13 (44.8)
 SCASS 2 4 (13.8)
 SCASS 3 2 (6.9)
Most severe MIH-TNI
 MIH-TNI 0 0 35 (100)
 MIH-TNI 1 1 (3.4) 0
 MIH-TNI 2a 2 (6.9) 0
 MIH-TNI 2b 3 (10.3) 0
 MIH-TNI 2c 5 (17.2) 0
 MIH-TNI 3 0 0
 MIH-TNI 4a 1 (3.4) 0
 MIH-TNI 4b 10 (34.5) 0
 MIH-TNI 4c 7 (24.1) 0
a

Values are depicted in mean, SD, and range. dmft/DMFT, decayed, missing, and filled teeth index (in lower-case letters for the deciduous teeth and in upper-case letters for the permanent teeth); GBI, gingival bleeding index; PCR, plaque control record; SCASS, Schiff cold air sensitivity scale; MIH-TNI, MIH-treatment need index; NA, not applicable.

Microbiome structure in MIH vs controls

The overall microbiome composition showed mostly similarities between the MIH group and the control group (PERMANOVA: R² =0.019, P-value = 0.287) indicating no major dysbiosis. In total, 36 bacterial species were observed with a mean relative abundance >0.1% in the whole population (Fig. 1). The Streptococcus spp. were most prevalent and abundant in the MIH group. When performing MaAsLin2 analysis, we observed a significant increase in the relative abundance of one specific ASV0055, belonging to Streptococcus spp., in the MIH group compared to the control group (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the MIH and control group in the relative abundance of Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Rothia, Veillonella, and Centipeda (Fig. S1).

Fig 1.

Heatmap depicts microbial relative abundance across samples with hierarchical clustering. Gradients represent bacterial abundance levels. Metadata distinguishes between control and MIH groups with bacterial taxa listed.

Overview of the microbiome structure at the species level in supragingival plaque samples from MIH (n = 29) and control (n = 35) groups and its association with clinical parameters. Shown is a two-way clustered heatmap of the 36 most abundant bacterial species (rows). The dendrograms at the top and left display the hierarchical clustering of samples and bacterial taxa, respectively. Shorter branch heights indicate greater similarity between clusters, revealing an overlap in the microbial structure between MIH and control groups. The color key and relevant clinical parameters (indicated by color codes) are presented on the right, showing caries experience by means of the DMF-T index, the number of MIH-affected teeth (Number_MIH), the plaque index (PCR), and the bleeding index (GBI). Clinical parameters presented in the figure are detailed in Table 1.

Fig 2.

Box plot depicts relative abundance of Streptococcus sp. across MIH and control groups. Individual values are distributed within each group. Statistical values include false discovery rate and coefficient.

Relative abundance of Streptococcus sp. in the MIH and control groups. Bar plots showing the difference in relative abundance (Y-axis) of Streptococcus sp. between the MIH and control group (X-axis).

In the correlation-based network between specific ASVs, α-diversity index, and clinical parameters, we a observed significant correlation between taxa and α-diversity, which was mostly positively oriented (Fig. 3). It indicates a strongly interconnected community linked to higher plaque diversity, while ASV0001 (Streptococcus sp.) and ASV0003 (Haemophilus sp.) were associated with a more single-dominated microbiome. Only a few taxa were correlated with clinical parameters: we observed positive correlations between ASV0055 (Streptococcus spp.) and caries experience (ρ = 0.74, P-value < 0.001) and MIH-TNI (ρ = 0.78, P-value < 0.001) and the number of MIH-affected teeth (ρ = 0.70, P-value < 0.001). ASV0100 (Mannheimia sp.) increased significantly with a higher number of MIH-affected teeth (ρ = 0.47, P-value = 0.020), whereas ASV0053 (Bergeyella sp.) decreased with increased caries experience (ρ = −0.45, P-value = 0.030; Fig. 3; Fig. S2).

Fig 3.

Network diagram depicts microbial co-occurrence relationships, with nodes representing bacterial taxa and environmental factors. Edges indicate associations, linking taxa to diversity, richness, evenness, and MIH-related variables.

Correlation-based network visualizing pairwise correlations between specific ASVs, α-diversity index, and clinical parameters. Each edge stands for a considerable (Spearman’s ρ > 0.45or ρ < −0.45) and significant (P < 0.05) correlation. The different colors indicate positive (green) and negative (red) correlations. The size of the edge indicates the ρ-value; the bigger the edge, the stronger the association.

Bacterial diversity

There was no significant difference in the α-diversity (Shannon index) in the whole population of MIH patients and controls (Fig. 4A). Figure 4B shows the α-diversity for both MIH and control groups compared to the number of MIH-affected teeth, with the healthy controls all on the zero line. In MIH subgroup analysis, we observed a significant association between the α-diversity (ρ = −0.42, P-value = 0.024) and evenness (ρ = −0.47, P-value = 0.010), as with an increasing number of MIH-affected teeth, both decreased significantly. The correlations between α-diversity and all other clinical parameters, such as GBI, PCR, dmft/DMFT, most severe SCASS, most severe MIH-TNI, and the number of restored and extracted teeth, were not significant.

Fig 4.

Box plot compares alpha diversity between control and MIH groups. Scatterplot depicts relationship between alpha diversity and number of MIH-affected teeth, illustrating variations in microbial diversity across samples.

Bacterial diversity. (A) The boxplot of the Shannon index presents the differences in α-diversity between the MIH (n = 29) and control groups (n = 35). (B) α-Diversity based on the Shannon index (Y-axis) in correlation with the number of MIH-affected teeth (Number_MIH; X-axis) assessed for the MIH and control groups (Number_MIH = 0).

DISCUSSION

The objective of the study was to compare the supragingival plaque microbiome between MIH-affected and healthy age-matched children and adolescents. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the composition of the oral microbiome in MIH patients compared to a control group of orally healthy peers. Yet, only a limited number of studies have investigated the oral microbiome in MIH patients to date, making our study particularly noteworthy.

Our findings indicate that the overall microbiome composition was highly similar between children and adolescents with MIH and those with healthy oral conditions. This suggests that the composition of supragingival plaque in MIH patients maintains a relatively normal profile (Fig. 1). In this study, MIH patients affected by caries due to their structural anomaly had already received restorative treatment; therefore, there was no interaction with a dysbiotic, caries-associated microbiome. This factor is of crucial importance for the interpretation of the results, as it ensures that the differences in the microbiome structure are not superimposed by caries-related dysbiosis and can be attributed exclusively to the non-carious aspect of MIH. The therapeutic consequence of treating MIH patients should generally be directed to create or sustain this microbial homeostasis. The similarities in the oral microbiomes of both groups indirectly indicate that children with MIH and previous caries experience (dmft/DMFT of 4.0 ± 2.4; Table 1) were able to return to a homeostatic state after preventive and restorative therapy.

However, we observed a significantly higher abundance of a specific ASV belonging to the Streptococcus species in the MIH group (Fig. 2). Streptococcus species are common inhabitants of the oral cavity (32). As a part of the early colonizer complex, they influence plaque formation and development (33). While Streptococcus sanguinis is associated with healthy oral conditions (34), Streptococcus mutans is linked to dental caries being particularly frequent in the oral cavity in individuals with caries (35, 36). Clinically, a significantly higher abundance of Streptococcus spp. in the oral microbiome is related to an increased tendency for plaque formation on dental surfaces. This is favored by the rough and uneven surfaces of MIH-affected teeth and may explain the increased presence of Streptococcus spp. Additionally, more severe forms of MIH show extended defects, providing an ideal environment for bacterial colonization due to the higher porosity. Severe MIH (MIH-TNI 4a–4c) is also associated with tooth hypersensitivity, negatively impacting the oral hygiene of affected children and adolescents (24). Patients experiencing sensitivity or even pain are more likely to brush their teeth less thoroughly, which leads to further plaque accumulation. Our results indicate that although the oral microbiome in MIH patients largely retains its typical structure, the increased presence of Streptococcus spp. may explain the higher susceptibility of MIH-affected teeth to caries observed in previous clinical studies (10). In order to obtain more precise results at the species level, metagenomic analyses would be required, which are technically much more complex and cost intensive. Consent for such analyses on the ex vivo biofilm samples from this cohort was not granted by the ethics committee and thus the parents/guardians.

Pappa et al. reported a lower microbial diversity in MIH patients compared to a healthy control group based on a bacterial proteome analysis of saliva (37). A highly diverse microbiome seems to be stable, while reduced microbial diversity is linked to dysbiosis and, thus, pathological conditions (21). In our study, only the MIH subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in α-diversity and evenness with an increasing number of MIH-affected teeth. In general, however, there was no significant difference in α-diversity between the MIH and control groups. This finding is likely due to the high heterogeneity within the control group, resulting in a wide range of microbial diversity. This variability can be explained by several factors influencing the oral microbiome in children and adolescents, such as lifestyle (38), dietary habits (18), or oral hygiene routine (18), and could mask potential differences between groups. The increased presence of Streptococcus spp. in the supragingival plaque of MIH patients demonstrated in our study supports the theory that it may attach more effectively to the porous surfaces of MIH-affected teeth, displacing other less abundant species and potentially reducing microbial diversity. With an increasing number of MIH-affected teeth, this effect might further aggravate, possibly leading to dysbiosis.

In contrast, Hernandez et al. observed generally higher diversity on hypomineralized teeth, suggesting that enamel degradation increases surface porosity, leading to higher bacterial attachment and diversity (20). Their study was performed in a split-mouth design, comparing plaque samples of MIH-affected and sound teeth within the same patient, without including a control group. Moreover, only MIH-affected teeth without enamel breakdown and atypical restorations were included, and caries experience based on the dmft/DMFT was not reported. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the children had active caries potentially affecting microbial diversity. Nevertheless, Hernandez et al. observed a higher abundance of several proteolytic microorganisms on the hypomineralized teeth. Although streptococci are primarily saccharolytic (39), they also show proteolytic activity, utilizing salivary proteins as a nutrient source to colonize areas of the oral cavity (40). It would be interesting to determine whether the specific proteins found in the enamel of MIH-affected teeth could promote the proteolytic activity of streptococci, which could favor the bacterial penetration of hypomineralized teeth, as also suggested by Hernandez et al. for the proteolytic bacteria they found.

Although there are only three studies on the oral microbial composition of children with MIH to date, their biofilms show a tendency toward species of early plaque formation and potential cariogenic pathogenicity. The therapeutic approach should, therefore, focus on establishing and maintaining microbial homeostasis. This should comprise targeted preventive care, including sufficient chemical and mechanical plaque control. The regular application of sufficiently high-concentrated topical fluorides is of crucial therapeutic importance in the clinical management of MIH. Studies by Pandit et al. have shown that the cariogenic Streptococcus mutans, in particular, can be inhibited in its acid production, acid tolerance, and extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) formation by fluorides in a dose-dependent manner (41). However, the effect of a 1-minute fluoride application on acidogenicity, aciduricity, and EPS formation only occurs at a minimum concentration of 300 ppm F and follows a concentration-dependent manner up to 2,000 ppm F (42). Based on our results, it can be concluded that brief exposure to a fluoride product with a sufficiently high concentration is an effective preventive measure for MIH and can contribute to maintaining a healthy microbial balance in the oral cavity. Furthermore, it is essential to consider treatment approaches that explicitly address the hypersensitivity of MIH-affected teeth to enhance the patient’s ability to perform effective mechanical plaque control without any pain-related limitations. Along with fluoride products, fissure sealants have proven effective in reducing dental hypersensitivity (43) and are considered the first choice for preventing caries and post-eruptive enamel breakdown in MIH-affected teeth (44, 45). Regarding more invasive treatment options, it may be beneficial to remove the affected porous enamel completely through restorative therapy to reduce the surface available for adhesion and penetration of Streptococcus and other bacterial species. In addition to minimizing plaque accumulation sites, removing structurally compromised enamel also improves the longevity of restorations, as demonstrated in clinical studies (4648).

Although our study has shown many unprecedented results, it has some limitations, including the monocentric cross-sectional setting with limited cohort size and the inability to include the full calculated sample size. Due to these methodological factors, no causalities can be demonstrated. Therefore, we believe that intra-oral conditions such as rough tooth surfaces and often limited oral hygiene due to hypersensitivity promote the increased abundance of Streptococcus species in particular. In addition, other factors that may affect the oral microbiome, such as dietary habits, lifestyle, and other environmental variables, were not recorded. This may have contributed to the high heterogeneity observed within the control group, even though all patients were healthy and free of oral diseases. The lifestyle and dietary habits of children and adolescents are not comparable to those of adult cohorts, which may be one reason for the limited data available in the current literature. Therefore, prospective studies with larger sample sizes should take these factors into consideration in the future.

Conclusions

In summary, our findings highlight that the microbiome of children with MIH does not differ significantly from that of healthy children of the same age. Although the structural anomaly favors carious lesions, microbial homeostasis can be achieved if these are well treated preventively and restoratively. However, children affected by MIH remain high-risk patients, as the severity of the disease and the number of MIH-affected teeth might impair microbial diversity. Furthermore, the increased abundance of Streptococcus spp. in MIH patients indicates a higher caries susceptibility, emphasizing the need for targeted dental care focusing on plaque control and the use of topical fluoride. Further studies with larger cohort sizes and metagenomic approaches are needed to evaluate the possible role of the proteolytic activity of the microorganisms in the supragingival plaque of MIH patients and their effects on dental hard tissues.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all children and adolescents for participating in the study. We are greatly indebted to Dr. Vanessa Schamberger and Dr. Clara Muscholl for their assistance with the recruitment of the study participants and the sampling and Tina Maxelon for her technical assistance. We owe our comprehensive preventive and restorative treatment concept for the management of MIH to our mentor, Prof. em. Dr. Dr. H. J. Staehle, who is still considered a great pioneer in the field of German preventive and restorative dentistry.

Conceptualization: C.F.; methodology: C.F., M.J., and S.B.; formal analyses: M.J. and S.B.; investigation: M.J. and M.S.; resources: C.F.; data curation: M.J., C.B. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation: M.J. and S.B.; writing—review and editing: C.F., S.B., M.J., and M.S.; project administration: C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Marina Jung, Email: marina.jung@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Cassio Almeida-da-Silva, University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Data are available in the SRA database under the Bioproject PRJNA1224592 (49).

ETHICS APPROVAL

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg (S-550/2021).

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02897-24.

Supplemental material. spectrum.02897-24-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 and S2.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02897-24.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S. 2001. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Caries Res 35:390–391. doi: 10.1159/000047479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sekundo C, Jung M, Muscholl C, Frese C. 2024. Oral health-related quality of life and survival analysis after preventive and restorative treatment of molar-incisor hypomineralisation. Sci Rep 14:777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51223-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Garot E, Rouas P, Somani C, Taylor GD, Wong F, Lygidakis NA. 2022. An update of the aetiological factors involved in molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23:23–38. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00646-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rodd HD, Graham A, Tajmehr N, Timms L, Hasmun N. 2021. Molar incisor hypomineralisation: current knowledge and practice. Int Dent J 71:285–291. doi: 10.1111/idj.12624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hernandez M, Boj JR, Espasa E. 2016. Do we really know the prevalence of MIH? J Clin Pediatr Dent 40:259–263. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Jälevik B. 2010. Prevalence and diagnosis of molar-incisor- hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 11:59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03262714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhao D, Dong B, Yu D, Ren Q, Sun Y. 2018. The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization: evidence from 70 studies. Int J Paediatr Dent 28:170–179. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lopes LB, Machado V, Mascarenhas P, Mendes JJ, Botelho J. 2021. The prevalence of molar-incisor hypomineralization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11:22405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01541-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Elhennawy K, Manton DJ, Crombie F, Zaslansky P, Radlanski RJ, Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Schwendicke F. 2017. Structural, mechanical and chemical evaluation of molar-incisor hypomineralization-affected enamel: a systematic review. Arch Oral Biol 83:272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Americano GCA, Jacobsen PE, Soviero VM, Haubek D. 2017. A systematic review on the association between molar incisor hypomineralization and dental caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 27:11–21. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ebel M, Bekes K, Klode C, Hirsch C. 2018. The severity and degree of hypomineralisation in teeth and its influence on oral hygiene and caries prevalence in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 28:648–657. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Giuca MR, Lardani L, Pasini M, Beretta M, Gallusi G, Campanella V. 2020. State-of-the-art on MIH. Part. 1 definition and aepidemiology. Eur J Paediatr Dent 21:80–82. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.01.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Somani C, Taylor GD, Garot E, Rouas P, Lygidakis NA, Wong FSL. 2022. An update of treatment modalities in children and adolescents with teeth affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH): a systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23:39–64. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00635-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lygidakis NA, Garot E, Somani C, Taylor GD, Rouas P, Wong FSL. 2022. Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH): an updated European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 23:3–21. doi: 10.1007/s40368-021-00668-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. 2005. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 43:5721–5732. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Escapa IF, Chen T, Huang Y, Gajare P, Dewhirst FE, Lemon KP. 2018. New Insights into human nostril microbiome from the expanded human oral microbiome database (eHOMD): a resource for the microbiome of the human aerodigestive tract. mSystems 3:e00187-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00187-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Human Microbiome Project Consortium . 2012. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486:215–221. doi: 10.1038/nature11209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sedghi L, DiMassa V, Harrington A, Lynch SV, Kapila YL. 2021. The oral microbiome: role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease. Periodontol 2000 87:107–131. doi: 10.1111/prd.12393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Baker JL, Mark Welch JL, Kauffman KM, McLean JS, He X. 2024. The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat Rev Microbiol 22:89–104. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00963-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hernández M, Planells P, Martínez E, Mira A, Carda-Diéguez M. 2020. Microbiology of molar-incisor hypomineralization lesions. A pilot study. J Oral Microbiol 12:1766166. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1766166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Johnson K-A, Burnet PWJ. 2016. Microbiome: should we diversify from diversity? Gut Microbes 7:455–458. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1241933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Toumba KJ, Twetman S, Splieth C, Parnell C, van Loveren C, Lygidakis NΑ. 2019. Guidelines on the use of fluoride for caries prevention in children: an updated EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 20:507–516. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00464-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejàre I, Papagiannoulis L, Koch G, Martens LC, Hallonsten A-L. 2003. Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatr Dent 4:110–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Steffen R, Krämer N, Bekes K. 2017. The Würzburg MIH concept: the MIH treatment need index (MIH TNI): a new index to assess and plan treatment in patients with molar incisior hypomineralisation (MIH). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 18:355–361. doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0301-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Schiff T, Delgado E, Zhang YP, Cummins D, DeVizio W, Mateo LR. 2009. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of an in-office desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate in providing instant and lasting relief of dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 22 Spec No A:8A–15A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. World Health Organization . 2013. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed [Google Scholar]
  • 27. O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. 1972. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 43:38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ainamo J, Bay I. 1975. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. IBM Corp . 2017. New York: IBM corp Armonk [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mallick H, Rahnavard A, McIver LJ, Ma S, Zhang Y, Nguyen LH, Tickle TL, Weingart G, Ren B, Schwager EH, Chatterjee S, Thompson KN, Wilkinson JE, Subramanian A, Lu Y, Waldron L, Paulson JN, Franzosa EA, Bravo HC, Huttenhower C. 2021. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput Biol 17:e1009442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, Dewhirst FE. 2006. The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Periodontol 2000 42:80–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00174.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Diaz PI, Chalmers NI, Rickard AH, Kong C, Milburn CL, Palmer RJ, Kolenbrander PE. 2006. Molecular characterization of subject-specific oral microflora during initial colonization of enamel. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2837–2848. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2837-2848.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhu B, Macleod LC, Kitten T, Xu P. 2018. Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm formation & interaction with oral pathogens. Future Microbiol 13:915–932. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bhaumik D, Manikandan D, Foxman B. 2021. Cariogenic and oral health taxa in the oral cavity among children and adults: a scoping review. Arch Oral Biol 129:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. van Houte J. 1994. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res 73:672–681. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730031301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pappa E, Vastardis H, Makridakis M, Zoidakis J, Vougas K, Stamatakis G, Samiotaki M, Rahiotis C. 2022. Analysis of human and microbial salivary proteomes in children offers insights on the molecular pathogenesis of molar-incisor hypomineralization. Biomedicines 10:2061. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. 2018. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 24:392–400. doi: 10.1038/nm.4517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Takahashi N. 2015. Oral microbiome metabolism: from "Who are they?" to "What are they doing?" J Dent Res 94:1628–1637. doi: 10.1177/0022034515606045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kindblom C, Davies JR, Herzberg MC, Svensäter G, Wickström C. 2012. Salivary proteins promote proteolytic activity in Streptococcus mitis biovar 2 and Streptococcus mutans. Mol Oral Microbiol 27:362–372. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00650.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Pandit S, Kim HJ, Song KY, Jeon JG. 2013. Relationship between fluoride concentration and activity against virulence factors and viability of a cariogenic biofilm: in vitro study. Caries Res 47:539–547. doi: 10.1159/000348519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pandit S, Cai JN, Jung JE, Jeon JG. 2015. Effect of 1-minute fluoride treatment on potential virulence and viability of a cariogenic biofilm. Caries Res 49:449–457. doi: 10.1159/000434731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Bekes K, Amend S, Priller J, Zamek C, Stamm T, Krämer N. 2022. Hypersensitivity relief of MIH-affected molars using two sealing techniques: a 12-week follow-up. Clin Oral Investig 26:1879–1888. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04163-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fragelli CMB, Souza J de, Bussaneli DG, Jeremias F, Santos-Pinto LD, Cordeiro R de C. 2017. Survival of sealants in molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization: 18-month follow-up. Braz Oral Res 31:e30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Stamataki E. 2009. Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 10:223–226. doi: 10.1007/BF03262686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. de Souza JF, Fragelli CB, Jeremias F, Paschoal MAB, Santos-Pinto L, de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R. 2017. Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization. Clin Oral Investig 21:1725–1733. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1968-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Linner T, Khazaei Y, Bücher K, Pfisterer J, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. 2020. Comparison of four different treatment strategies in teeth with molar-incisor hypomineralization-related enamel breakdown-A retrospective cohort study. Int J Paediatr Dent 30:597–606. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sönmez H, Saat S. 2017. A clinical evaluation of deproteinization and different cavity designs on resin restoration performance in MIH-affected molars: two-year results. J Clin Pediatr Dent 41:336–342. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. MIH . 2014. BioProject, national center for biotechnology information. University hospital Lubeck, Bethesda. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1224592 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. spectrum.02897-24-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1 and S2.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02897-24.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in the SRA database under the Bioproject PRJNA1224592 (49).


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES