Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2025 May 9;8(5):e259467. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9467

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Bleeding Risk in Venous Thromboembolism

Carmine Siniscalchi 1,, Tiziana Meschi 1, Pierpaolo Di Micco 2, Egidio Imbalzano 3, Luis Hernández-Blasco 4, Isabelle Mahé 5,6, José Luis Fernández-Reyes 7, Alberto García-Ortega 8, Peter Verhamme 9, Joaquín Alfonso-Megido 10, Manuel Monreal 11,12; and the RIETE Investigators
PMCID: PMC12065040  PMID: 40343701

Abstract

This case-control study evaluates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and bleeding risk during anticoagulation in patients with acute venous thromboembolism.

Introduction

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are a well-established therapeutic target for cardiovascular risk reduction, but their role in hemostasis remains less understood.1,2 While previous studies3,4,5 suggest that aggressive LDL-C lowering may increase bleeding risk in patients with arterial disease, this association has not been explored in patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to evaluate LDL-C levels and bleeding risk during anticoagulation in patients with acute VTE.

Methods

We conducted a case-control analysis using data from the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry, a large multicenter, observational registry enrolling consecutive patients with objectively diagnosed VTE.6 The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Comité de Ética de la Investigación del Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Spain). All participants provided written informed consent. The study included patients from March 2009 to July 2024 who had available baseline LDL-C levels. Because measuring LDL-C is not routine, 75.6% of patients did not have available LDL-C values. Therefore, we checked for potential selection bias by comparing baseline characteristics of patients with and without LDL-C measurements and found no major differences among patients without LDL-C measurements (eTable in Supplement 1). Bleeding events during the first 90 days of anticoagulation were classified as major or nonmajor bleeding according to standard definitions. We reported standardized differences between patients in both subgroups. Standardized differences greater than 0.1 in absolute value were considered relevant. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for competing risks using the Fine-Gray method, were used to assess LDL-C levels and bleeding outcomes. This study followed the STROBE reporting guideline. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp). To identify comparisons of clinical relevance, we reported standardized differences between patients in both subgroups. A standardized difference greater than 0.1 in absolute value was considered relevant.

Results

Among 19 237 patients with available LDL-C levels, 2502 (13.0%) had LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259). Compared with those with LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL or higher, these patients were older, more frequently male, and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, prior arterial disease, anemia, and active cancer (Table 1). Compared with those with LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL or higher, these patients were older (standardized difference, 0.228), more frequently male (standardized difference, 0.125), and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (standardized difference, 0.254), diabetes (standardized difference, 0.355), prior arterial disease (standardized difference, 0.144), anemia (standardized difference, 0.436), and active cancer (standardized difference, 0.159). During the first 90 days of anticoagulation, 743 patients (3.9%) experienced bleeding events: 294 major bleeding, 449 nonmajor bleeding, and 32 fatal bleeding cases (Table 2). Patients with LDL-C levels less than 70 mg/dL had an increased risk of overall bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16-1.69) and nonmajor bleeding (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.17-1.90), with hematomas being the most frequent bleeding site (AHR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.49-2.98). The increased bleeding risk was observed early during anticoagulation and was independent of statin use.

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients According to LDL-C Levels.

Characteristic LDL-C level, No. (%) Standardized difference
<70 mg/dL (n = 2502) ≥70 mg/dL (n = 16 735)
Demographic
Sex
Female 1088 (43) 8322 (49.7) 0.125
Male 1414 (57) 8413 (50.3) 0.125
Age, mean (SD), y 69 (17) 65 (17) 0.228
BMI, mean (SD) 28 (6.0) 29 (5.7) 0.136
Outpatients 1540 (64) 11 388 (70) 0.137
Initial VTE presentation
Pulmonary embolism 1694 (68) 10 179 (61) 0.144
Lower-limb DVT 661 (26) 5836 (35) 0.184
Upper-limb DVT 147 (5.9) 720 (4.3) 0.072
Comorbidities
Chronic lung disease 332 (13) 1698 (10) 0.097
Hypertension 1516 (61) 8045 (48) 0.254
Diabetes 720 (29) 2409 (14) 0.355
Prior myocardial infarction 373 (15) 989 (5.9) 0.299
Prior ischemic stroke 263 (11) 965 (5.8) 0.174
Peripheral artery disease 159 (6.4) 550 (3.3) 0.144
Recent major bleeding 98 (3.9) 322 (1.9) 0.119
Serum lipid levels
Total cholesterol 125 (27) 189 (39) 1.886
LDL-cholesterol 58 (8.1) 118 (32) 2.540
HDL-cholesterol 44 (22) 46 (15) 0.090
Triglycerides 128 (73) 137 (65) 0.134
Risk factors for bleeding
Active cancer 399 (16) 1767 (11) 0.159
Liver cirrhosis 27 (1.1) 49 (0.3) 0.095
Gastroduodenal ulcer 44 (1.8) 163 (1.0) 0.068
Anemia 1146 (46) 4247 (25) 0.436
Leukocyte count >11 000/μL 801 (32) 4146 (25) 0.161
Platelet count <100 000/μL 83 (3.3) 286 (1.7) 0.103
Abnormal prothrombin time 369 (16) 1068 (7.0) 0.294
CrCl levels <60 mL/min 1052 (42) 4804 (29) 0.282
Prognostic scores for bleeding
RIETE, high-risk (≥4 points) 439 (18) 1191 (7.6) 0.320
VTE-BLEED, high-risk (≥2 points) 1553 (63) 7306 (45) 0.371
Modified ACCP, high-risk (≥2 points) 1641 (71) 7856 (50) 0.436
DOAC, high-risk (≥8 points) 338 (19) 1080 (9.0) 0.287

Abbreviations: ACCP, American College of Chest Physicians; BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); CrCl, creatinine clearance; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HDL, high-density lipoprotein: LDL, low-density lipoprotein: RIETE, Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica; VTE-BLEED, venous thromboembolism-bleedings.

SI conversion factors: To convert CrCl level to milliliters per second per meter squared, multiply by 0.0167; HDL and LDL from mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259; platelets to ×109/L, multiply by 1; triglycerides from mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0113; and WBCs to cells ×109/L, multiply by 0.001.

Table 2. Rates of Events During the First 90 Days According to LDL-C Levels at Baseline.

Event LDL-C level, No. (%) Odds ratio (95%CI)
<70 mg/dL (n = 2502) ≥70 mg/dL (n = 16 735)
Overall bleeding 158 (6.31) 585 (3.50) 1.86 (1.55-2.23)
Major bleeding 62 (2.48) 232 (1.39) 1.81 (1.36-2.40)
Gastrointestinal 16 (0.64) 75 (0.45) 1.43 (0.83-2.46)
Hematoma 23 (0.92) 53 (0.32) 2.92 (1.79-4.77)
Intracranial 11 (0.44) 39 (0.23) 1.89 (0.97-3.70)
Retroperitoneal 5 (0.20) 20 (0.12) 1.67 (0.63-4.46)
Urinary 2 (0.08) 12 (0.07) 1.11 (0.25-4.98)
Uterine 1 (0.04) 11 (0.07) 0.61 (0.08-4.71)
Other sites 4 (0.16) 22 (0.13) 1.22 (0.42-3.53)
Nonmajor bleeding 96 (3.84) 353 (2.11) 1.85 (1.47-2.33)
Hematoma 24 (0.96) 76 (0.45) 2.12 (1.34-3.37)
Urinary 18 (0.72) 91 (0.54) 1.33 (0.80-2.20)
Gastrointestinal 23 (0.92) 70 (0.42) 2.21 (1.38-3.54)
Uterine 4 (0.16) 20 (0.12) 1.34 (0.46-3.92)
Other sites 27 (1.08) 96 (0.57) 1.89 (1.23-2.90)
Fatal bleeding 11 (0.44) 21 (0.13) 3.51 (1.69-7.30)
Intracranial 4 (0.16) 10 (0.06) 2.68 (0.84-8.55)
Retroperitoneal 2 (0.08) 5 (0.03) 2.68 (0.52-13.8)
Gastrointestinal 2 (0.08) 3 (0.02) 4.46 (0.75-26.7)
Hematoma 1 (0.04) 0 NA
Other sites 2 (0.08) 3 (0.02) 4.46 (0.75-26.7)
Nonbleeding deaths 180 (7.2) 533 (3.2) 2.36 (1.98-2.81)
Pulmonary embolism 10 (0.40) 31 (0.19) 2.16 (1.06-4.42)
Disseminated cancer 48 (1.9) 190 (1.1) 1.70 (1.24-2.34)
Infection 22 (0.88) 48 (0.29) 3.08 (1.86-5.12)
Heart failure 17 (0.68) 30 (0.18) 3.81 (2.10-6.92)
Respiratory failure 11 (0.44) 49 (0.29) 1.50 (0.78-2.90)
Multiorganic failure 18 (0.72) 48 (0.29) 2.52 (1.46-4.34)
Bronchoaspiration 10 (0.40) 10 (0.06) 6.71 (2.79-16.1)
Unknown 16 (0.64) 42 (0.25) 2.56 (1.44-4.56)
Other 28 (1.1) 85 (0.51) 2.22 (1.44-3.41)

Abbreviations: LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NA, not applicable.

SI conversion factors: To convert LDL from mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259.

Discussion

Study limitations include the high proportion of missing LDL-C data due to the lack of routine lipid testing. However, the lack of important baseline differences between included and excluded patients is notable. Additionally, our multivariable analysis confirmed that the association between LDL-C levels and bleeding risk was independent of these variables. Another limitation is the inability to account for LDL-C fluctuations over time, which may have affected bleeding risk, particularly in patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy adjustments.

In this study, low LDL-C levels were associated with an increased risk of bleeding, particularly hematomas, in patients receiving anticoagulation for VTE. Given that LDL-C is not currently considered in bleeding risk stratification, our findings suggest a potential new factor for risk assessment in this population. Future studies should explore whether LDL-C levels can refine existing bleeding risk models and whether strategies to mitigate this risk are warranted.

Supplement 1.

eTable. Baseline Characteristics in Patients With- Versus Without Information on LDL-C Levels

Supplement 2.

Nonauthor Collaborators. The RIETE Investigators

Supplement 3.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082-e1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun L, Clarke R, Bennett D, et al. ; China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group . International Steering Committee; International Co-ordinating Centre, Oxford; National Co-ordinating Centre, Beijing; Regional Co-ordinating Centres. Causal associations of blood lipids with risk of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in Chinese adults. Nat Med. 2019;25(4):569-574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang Q, Sun D, Pei C, et al. ; CCC-ACS Investigators . LDL cholesterol levels and in-hospital bleeding in patients on high-intensity antithrombotic therapy: findings from the CCC-ACS project. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(33):3175-3186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu J, Chen Z, Wang M, et al. Low LDL-C level and intracranial haemorrhage risk after ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023;8(2):127-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bikdeli B, Jiménez D, Hawkins M, et al. ; RIETE Investigators . Rationale, design and methodology of the computerized registry of patients with venous thromboembolism (RIETE). Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(1):214-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eTable. Baseline Characteristics in Patients With- Versus Without Information on LDL-C Levels

Supplement 2.

Nonauthor Collaborators. The RIETE Investigators

Supplement 3.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Network Open are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES