Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2025 Apr 28;16:1485769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1485769

Exosomes as natural vectors for therapeutic delivery of bioactive compounds in skin diseases

Somayeh Keshtkar 1, Zahra Asvar 2, Haniyeh Najafi 3, Mozhdeh Heidari 4, Maryam Kaviani 4, Fatemeh Sabet Sarvestani 4, Ali Mohammad Tamaddon 3, Maryam Sadat Sadati 1, Nasrin Hamidizadeh 1, Negar Azarpira 4,*
PMCID: PMC12066514  PMID: 40356952

Abstract

Skin diseases are a broad category of diseases and each has complex conditions, which makes it challenging for dermatologists to provide targeted treatment. Exosomes are natural vesicles secreted by cells and play a key role in cell communication. Due to their unique characteristics, including inherent stability, minimal immunogenicity, high biocompatibility, and exceptional ability to penetrate cells, exosomes are being explored as potential delivery vehicles for therapeutics across various diseases including skin problems. Utilizing exosomes for drug delivery in skin diseases can improve treatment outcomes and reduce the side effects of traditional drug delivery methods. Indeed, exosomes can be engineered or utilized as an innovative approach to deliver therapeutic agents such as small molecule drugs, genes, or proteins specifically to affected skin cells. In addition to targeting specific skin cells or tissues, these engineered exosome-based nanocarriers can reduce off-target effects and improve drug efficacy. Hence, this article highlights the transformative potential of this technology in revolutionizing drug delivery in dermatology and improving patient outcomes.

Keywords: exosomes, delivery, skin diseases, drug, genetic agent, protein

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name FPHAR_fphar-2025-1485769_wc_abs.jpg

Summary of the application of exosomes for delivery of genetic agents, small molecule drugs, proteins in skin diseases.

1 Introduction

Skin diseases can manifest in various ways such as ulcers, inflammatory diseases, and cancer. Skin ulcers are open wounds that are usually caused by pressure, poor circulation, or injury. Inflammatory skin diseases, like atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, vitiligo, etc., cause swelling, irritation, and redness of the skin. Melanoma refers to the abnormal growth of melanocytes that can lead to the development of malignant tumors (Anand et al., 2022). The treatment of skin problems often deals with symptom management and can be challenging due to the different nature of these conditions. A common obstacle in addressing skin issues involves the limited efficacy, the resistance to treatment and the potential side effects of drugs (Kim et al., 2021b; Yu et al., 2024). This can make it difficult to develop effective treatments without causing side effects or further damage to the skin. In this regard, drug delivery technologies have been developed to improve treatment outcomes in ways, including increasing therapeutic efficacy, decreasing toxicity, enhancing patient compliance, and enabling completely new medical treatments (Gao et al., 2023). Nowadays, a multitude of drug delivery systems have emerged, employing various technologies to facilitate more efficient, regulated, and precise delivery. The unique features of each system govern its specific release kinetics and mechanisms, which are influenced by the distinct physical, chemical, and structural properties that, in turn, impact their interactions with different pharmacological agents (Mattos et al., 2017). Recently, extensive research has been conducted on organic and inorganic nanomaterials to create specialized nanocarriers for drug transport (Watkins et al., 2015). Organic nanomaterials include natural or synthetic polymers and lipids. Among organic nanomaterials, polymeric nanocarriers are ideal for sustained therapeutic delivery with biocompatibility and biodegradability properties. A variety of synthetic polymers, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly-L-lactic acid, polyvinyl alcohol, and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid), along with natural polymers like chitosan and alginate, are extensively used in the construction of nanocarriers (Obeid et al., 2017). Likewise, dense lipid nanocarriers and phospholipids, including micelles and liposomes, are advantageous for drug delivery and targeting. Inorganic nanomaterials are made of carbon, silica, iron oxide, gold, and silver materials. These nanomaterials are mainly used for diagnosis and imaging, although it has been found that they have the potential for drug delivery. They offered benefits such as high drug-loading capacity, low toxicity, cost-effective laboratory production improved biocompatibility, and the ability to modify their surfaces (Baeza et al., 2017; Khafaji et al., 2019). Despite their potential, these carriers face clinical challenges due to their short half-life, limited ability to cross biological barriers, the possibility of interaction with biomolecules and accumulations in cells, and concerns about immunogenicity and toxicity (Min et al., 2015; Sukhanova et al., 2018). Exosome-based carriers, naturally derived from cells, offer promising solutions. Due to high stability, excellent biocompatibility, minimal immunogenicity, and the ability to be selectively loaded with therapeutic cargo, exosomes are ideal for drug delivery (Sharma and Mukhopadhyay, 2024). Notably, exosomes can cross biological barriers, reduce drug clearance, and exhibit lower toxicity compared to organic and inorganic nanoparticles. The lipid bilayer membrane of exosomes also protects against cargo degradation, making them an attractive option for drug delivery (Zeng et al., 2023; Yadav et al., 2024). Therefore, in this review, firstly exosomes are introduced as a natural carrier for loading different therapeutic agents. Then, various foreign cargoes delivered by exosomes will be discussed for treating skin diseases.

1.1 Exosome, delivery, and uptake

Exosomes are tiny vesicles surrounded by a lipid layer, typically ranging from 30 to 150 nm that release from different cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), immune cells, and cancer cells. They carry important molecules like proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids and play a crucial role in cell-to-cell communication (Keshtkar et al., 2018; Keshtkar et al., 2022b). Exosomes facilitate intracellular communication through several mechanisms: a) interaction between exosome membrane proteins and receptors on target cells, b) interaction between soluble fragments derived from exosome membrane proteins and cell surface receptors, and c) internalization of exosome contents by target cells (Keshtkar et al., 2022a; Keshtkar et al., 2022b). Recipient cells can internalize exosomes through various mechanisms, such as lipid raft-, caveolae-, and clathrin-dependent endocytosis, macropinocytosis, and phagocytosis, and some receptor binding such as integrins, scavenger receptors, complement receptors, and T-cell immunoglobulin- and mucin-domain-containing molecule-4. These processes allow exosomes to deliver cargo to recipient cells, enabling them to perform biological functions (Morelli et al., 2004; Miyanishi et al., 2007; Tian et al., 2010; Escrevente et al., 2011; Mittelbrunn and Sánchez-Madrid, 2012; Svensson et al., 2013; Prada and Meldolesi, 2016).

There are several isolation methods for exosomes, such as ultracentrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, ultrafiltration, size exclusion chromatography (SEC), immunoaffinity, and polymer precipitation (Kar et al., 2023). Ultracentrifugation has been introduced as a gold standard method. Although this method is cost-effective and ideal for large-scale samples, it is time-consuming, can damage exosomes, and results in low yield and modest purity. Density gradient centrifugation avoids exosomal damage and achieves high purity but is time-consuming, takes over 16 h, requires labor-intensive preliminary preparation, and results in minimal yield. Ultrafiltration is a simple and quick method that does not need special equipment, produces high-purity components with moderate yield, but can result in the loss of small-diameter exosomes due to membrane clogging. SEC provides highly specific exosome subtype isolation in just 0.3 h with high yield and purity, but special columns and packing are needed to address lipoprotein contamination. Immunoaffinity capture-based isolation allows for the specific targeting of exosome subtypes but requires more complex procedures and specific antibodies. Polymer precipitation is a straightforward method suitable for large-volume samples, yielding high amounts in 0.3–12 h. However, it may result in low purity due to contaminants from protein aggregates or residual polymers. Totally, the choice of method depends on factors such as sample volume, desired purity, and downstream application goals (Zhou et al., 2020; Kar et al., 2023).

1.2 Exosome manipulation and drug loading

Various methods have been devised to incorporate therapeutic or diagnostic payloads such as chemical drugs, nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, and nanomaterials into exosomes. These techniques can be classified into pre-loading and post-loading methods (Figure 1) (Wang et al., 2021). In the pre-loading technique, cargos are loaded into donor cells before exosome isolation. This approach allows for the encapsulation of drugs within exosomes during their natural biogenesis. The process involves modifying donor cells by co-incubating them with the desired cargo or transfecting the target gene to release specific exosomes (Pascucci et al., 2014; Zhang H. et al., 2018). Notably, the pre-loading method ensures continuous production of cargo-loaded exosomes without compromising membrane integrity. However, it has limitations, including imprecise control over the amount of cargo loaded, low loading efficiency, potential gene expression changes in donor cells, and the risk of toxicity due to transfection agents (Liu et al., 2019; Xi et al., 2021; Kimiz-Gebologlu and Oncel, 2022).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Drug-loading methods in exosome.

The post-loading method involves loading drugs onto isolated natural exosomes. This approach has two distinct strategies: passive and active loading (Kimiz-Gebologlu and Oncel, 2022). Passive loading relies on the physical properties of the drug to passively diffuse into exosomes through co-incubation. Active loading employs various techniques to encapsulate the drug into exosomes including electroporation, sonication, fusion, freeze-thaw cycles, membrane permeabilizers, and extrusion (Xu et al., 2020; Xi et al., 2021). Electroporation uses a high-intensity electric field to create temporary holes in the exosome membrane, enabling drug entry. This method is effective for loading large molecules like microRNA (miRNA) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) but has a poor loading capacity due to RNA aggregation and stability issues (Sato et al., 2016; Akuma et al., 2019). Sonication disrupts the exosome membrane using ultrasonic waves, allowing hydrophobic drugs to pass through. This method maintains the integrity of exosome membranes and does not reduce membrane-bound protein or lipid content, but it can alter exosome viscosity (Kim et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2020). The fusion method combines exosomes and nanocomposites within a membrane structure, enhancing drug absorption, efficacy, and exocrine functions. This technique successfully enriches exosomes with hydrophilic components without compromising their function, significantly improving the cellular transport efficiency of chemotherapeutic agents (Akuma et al., 2019). Freeze-thaw cycles involve repeatedly freezing and thawing exosomes with drugs to improve encapsulation. This method has a lower drug loading capacity compared to sonication or extrusion and can cause exosome aggregation (Gurung et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2021a). Membrane permeabilizers like saponin interact with cholesterol to create pores in the membrane, improving the loading efficiency of enzymes like catalase into exosomes (Kim et al., 2016). The membrane extrusion method involves mixing exosomes with drug molecules and passing them through a nanofiltration membrane filter. This process creates fissures in the exosome membrane, allowing for drug loading. Researchers dissolve drugs in an appropriate solvent and slowly add them to exosomes. Devices like manual extruders or microgrinders are used to encapsulate drugs within exosomes (Liang et al., 2020). Generally, these techniques disrupt exosome membranes, enhancing drug encapsulation efficiency by up to 11 times. However, these methods can affect the exosome’s targeting properties and native structure (Akuma et al., 2019).

1.3 Routes of exosome administration

Exosome administration is a critical factor in therapeutic applications, with various routes offering distinct biodistribution and effects. Intravenous injection is common, enhancing treatments for heart, brain, and cancer conditions, despite rapid clearance by organs like the liver and lungs; modifications like PEGylation can extend circulation time (Kooijmans et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2018). Subcutaneous injections show promise in skin healing and malignancies, influencing immune cell behavior for faster recovery (Kim et al., 2019). Another method for administering exosomes into the body is through intradermal injection. This involves injecting exosomes into the dermis, which enhances wound closure rates, improves vascularity, and exhibits antitumor effects (Wang et al., 2019; Qiu et al., 2020). Intranasal delivery is effective for brain-targeted therapies, with studies showing protection against neurodegeneration and brain injuries (Zhuang et al., 2011; Liao et al., 2020). Intraperitoneal injections have yielded positive results in cancer and autoimmune disease models by modulating immune responses (Sun et al., 2010; Bellavia et al., 2017; Nojehdehi et al., 2018). Lastly, oral administration provides a non-invasive option, successfully delivering compounds like curcumin and inducing immune tolerance in autoimmune diseases (Figure 2) (Arntz et al., 2015; Aqil et al., 2017). This variability complicates the standardization of exosome delivery methods, making it difficult to achieve consistent therapeutic outcomes (Kang et al., 2021). Overall, the field needs further research to optimize dosing and evaluate the efficacy and safety of exosome-based treatments.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Exosome administration routes.

The potential of exosomes for drug delivery has garnered significant attention from the scientific community, highlighting their promise as a therapeutic strategy for various diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders (Gilligan and Dwyer, 2017; Das et al., 2018). In the following, the investigation of various cargoes loaded in exosomes for the treatment of skin diseases will be discussed and summarized in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Application of exosomes for delivery of active biomolecules in the skin diseases. Exosomes released from different source of cells. Different kind of cargo loaded in isolated exosomes and injected to different type of skin diseases in animal models.

2 Exosomes for delivering genetic agents in skin diseases

Gene therapy is a therapeutic approach based on various genetic materials, including messenger RNA (mRNA), miRNA, and DNA, for the treatment of various diseases including skin disorders. The delivery of genetic materials is challenging because the cell membrane prevents them from directly penetrating the cells in the body. In addition, genetic materials are very fragile and it is important to protect them from degradation by RNase in the extracellular fluid (Sarkar et al., 2020; Duan et al., 2021). Various RNA molecules can be loaded into exosomes and then delivered to specific cells or tissues using a range of biochemical or physical methods (Kim, 2020). Over the past years, notable advancements have been made in utilizing exosome-mediated gene therapy for the prevention and treatment of various diseases, including immune disorders, cancers, and infectious diseases. In continuation, the genetic agents loaded in exosomes and applied for skin diseases will be discussed (Table 1). AD is an inflammatory skin disease described by type 2 skin inflammation and a defective barrier (Shao et al., 2020). miRNA-147a, an anti-inflammatory micro-RNA in keratinocytes and endotheliocytes regulating inflammatory infiltration under pathological conditions, is a potential therapeutic agent for AD. According to the potential therapeutic effect of exosomes for AD and their carrier potential for gene delivery, Shi et al. innovatively developed a novel approach to alleviate AD by overexpressing miR-147a in adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). In this regard, they isolated exosomes to deliver miR-147a specifically to AD lesioned skin mice model. As a result, exosomes derived from miR-147a-overexpressing ADSCs extenuated pathological angiogenesis and inflammatory response during AD progression by targeting the VEGFA and MEF2A-TSLP axis (Shi et al., 2023).

TABLE 1.

Application of exosomes as a delivery vehicle for genetic agents in skin diseases.

Exosome source Cargo Loading method In-vitro/In-vivo model Administration route Result Ref.
ADSCs MiR-147a Lipofectamine 3000 In vivo: Mice model of AD Extenuated pathological angiogenesis and inflammatory response during AD progression Shi et al. (2023)
Human keratinocytes MiR-124-3p Electroporation In vivo: Mice model of psoriasis Intradermally Reduced skin thickness, as well as decreased epidermal thickness, proliferating cells, and the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde Longevity and Longevity (2023)
ADSCs MiR-146a Liposome In-vivo: Full-thickness wounds of rat model Injected into four sites of the wound Promoted the neovascularization of full-thickness skin defects Chen et al. (2023b)
ADSCs MiR-126-3p Liposome In-vivo
Full-thickness wounds of rat model
injected into the four sides of the wound Increased collagen deposition and angiogenesis simultaneously in skin defects Ma et al. (2022)
AMSCs MiR-135a Lipofectamine 2000 In-vivo: Full-thickness wound of rat model Injected directly into the full-thickness wound margin Promoted wound healing and epithelialization by promoting fibroblast migration Gao et al. (2020)
UCMSCs MiR-181c Lipofectamine 2000 In-vivo: full-thickness burn injury rat model Vein tail injection Reduced burn-induced inflammation by downregulating targeting mRNA encoding TLR4 in macrophages Li et al. (2016)
ADSCs MiR-29a Lipofectamine 2000 In-vivo: transdermal mice model
For scar formation
Subcutaneous Decreased scar formation by blocking the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway in fibroblasts Yuan et al. (2021)
SMSCs MiR-126 Lentivirus In-vivo: Diabetic Wound of rat model Improved angiogenesis and enhanced collagen maturation in ischemic diseases Tao et al. (2017)
ADSCs MiR-132 Lentivirus In-vivo: the diabetic wound of mice model Subcutaneous Reduced local inflammation, promoting angiogenesis, and stimulating M2-macrophage polarization Ge et al. (2023)
MSCs MiR-155inhibitor In vivo: diabetic wound mice model Increased significantly collagen deposition, re-epithelization, and angiogenesis Gondaliya et al. (2022)
ADSCs MiR-21-5p Electroporation In-vitro: HaCaT cells
In vivo: Diabetic wound of rat model
Applied evenly to the wound bed Increased angiogenesis, vessel maturation, collagen remodeling, and re-epithelization in diabetic wounds. promoted proliferation and migration of keratinocytes through Wnt/β-catenin signaling invitro Lv et al. (2020)
 BMMSCs lncRNA H19 Lipofectamine 2000 In-vivo: DFU mice model Injected into the skin around the wound Prevented the apoptosis and inflammation of fibroblasts by impairing PTEN inhibition, leading to the stimulated wound-healing process in DFU Li et al. (2020a)
ADSCs Nrf2 In vivo: DFU rat model Improved wound healing by increasing the expression level of and VEGFR2 and decreasing the level of inflammatory cytokine IL-1b, Il-6, and TNF-a and oxidative stress proteins NOX1, NOX4, and ROS Li et al. (2018)
mDC siBRAF electroporation In vitro: B16F10 cells
In vivo: melanoma mice model
subcutaneous enhanced anti-malignant melanoma activity and a high level of safety in vivo Inhibited melanoma growth by promoting T cell proliferation in vitro Lin et al. (2023)

Abbreviation: ADSCs, Adipose-derived stem cells; MSCs, Mesenchymal stem cells; AMSCs, amnion mesenchymal stem cells; UCMSCs, Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell; SMSCs, Synovium Mesenchymal Stem Cells; mDC, mature dendritic cell; HaCaT, human keratinocyte cell line; AD, Atopic dermatitis; siBRAF, BRAF, siRNA.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease described by abnormal differentiation and reduction of keratinocytes (Shao et al., 2020). MiR-124-3p can inhibit psoriasis-like skin inflammation by targeting STAT3 mRNA in keratinocytes. In the study of Liu et al., exosomes were isolated from human keratinocytes and miR-124-3p was transfected by electroporation to obtain Exo-miR-124-3p. Then, the injection was intradermally performed on the back skin of psoriasis mice. The results showed that miR-124-3p alleviated skin inflammation and reduced skin thickness, as well as decreased epidermal thickness, proliferating cells, and the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde (Longevity and Longevity, 2023).

MiR-146a acts as a critical molecular brake on aberrant inflammation targets mRNA encoding caspase recruitment domain protein 10 (CARD10) and regulates angiogenesis. MiR-146a also targets mRNA encoding CARD10 and regulates angiogenesis. Chen et al. transfected miR-146a to human ADSCs by liposomes. They extracted exosomes from miR-146a-modified ADSCs. Exosomes were injected into rats at four sites around skin defects. They showed that miR-146a promoted the neovascularization of full-thickness wounds in rats (Chen M. et al., 2023).

MiR-126-3p directly encodes phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) regulatory subunit 2 mRNA in skin fibroblasts and vascular endotheliocytes. Ma et al. transfected miR-126-3p inhibitor to human ADSCs cells by liposomes. Then, Exo-miR-126-3p inhibitors were isolated from the culture supernatant after 24 h and injected into the four sides of the full-thickness wound in rats. They found that topical treatment of wounds increased collagen deposition and angiogenesis simultaneously in skin defects (Ma et al., 2022).

MiR-135a targets mRNA encoding large tumor suppressor factor 2 (LATS2) in fibroblasts, promoting local fibroblast migration into wounds. Gao et al. transfected a miR-135a plasmid into human amnion MSCs(hAMSCs) by liposomes. Then, Exo-miR-135a was isolated from the culture supernatant after 48 h. After that, the Exo-miR-135a was mixed with collagen-I, and injected directly into the full-thickness wound margin of rats. After 5 days of treatment, rats receiving Exo-miR-135a showed the fastest wound healing. They found that miR-135a promotes wound healing and epithelialization by promoting fibroblast migration (Gao et al., 2020).

MiR-181c in the exosomes demonstrated a pivotal role in regulating inflammation. Li et al. transfected miR-181c into human umbilical cord MSCs (hUCMSCs) by liposomes, and Exo-miR-181c was obtained from the culture supernatant and applied for the treatment of the full-thickness burn injury rat model. They found that burn injury significantly increased the inflammatory reaction of rats. These results indicated that miR-181c can reduce burn-induced inflammation by downregulating mRNA encoding TLR4 in macrophages (Li et al., 2016).

The expression level of miR-29a in human burn scars and hypertrophic scar fibroblasts is significantly reduced compared to normal tissue and fibroblasts. Yuan et al. transfected miR-29a into hADSCs by liposomes. Exosomes derived from miR-29a-modified hADSCs were extracted and injected subcutaneously into a transdermal mice model to evaluate scar formation. They found that transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) was the target of miR-29a and inhibited scar hyperplasia by the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway in fibroblasts (Yuan et al., 2021).

Tao et al. investigated the therapeutic effect of overexpressing miR-126 in exosomes derived from synovial MSCs (SMSCs) on diabetic wounds in rats. In this study, SMSCs were transfected with miR-126 by lentivirus, then exosomes were extracted from SMSC-126 and injected into a diabetic rat model. They showed that exosomes derived from SMSC-126 improved angiogenesis in human dermal fibroblasts and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC-1) and enhanced collagen maturation in ischemic diseases through PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK (Tao et al., 2017).

MiR-132 targets the TGF-β, PI3K/AKT, and Hippo pathways, thereby promoting proliferation and migration. Ge et al. loaded lentivirus carrying miR-132 into ADSCs. Exosomes derived from miR-132-overexpressing ADSCs (miR-132-exo) were harvested from the supernatant and injected subcutaneously in four points around the wound in diabetic mice. The results showed miR-132-exo accelerates diabetic wound healing, by reducing local inflammation, promoting angiogenesis, and stimulating M2-macrophage polarization mediated by the NF-κB signaling pathway (Ge et al., 2023). In another study, Gondeliya et al. investigated the effect of directly loaded miR-155 inhibitor into MSC-Exosomes on a diabetic mice model. They showed that the treatment of wounds by miR-155 inhibitor-exosomes increased significantly collagen deposition, re-epithelization, and angiogenesis (Gondaliya et al., 2022).

Lv et al. loaded miR-21-5p into human ADSCs by electroporation. Then they extracted the exosomes containing miR-21-5p from ADSCs and applied them evenly to a wound bed in a diabetic rat model. The modified exosome increased angiogenesis, vessel maturation, collagen remodeling, and re-epithelization in diabetic wounds. In vitro study on a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) loaded with miR-21-5p-exosomes showed that the engineered exosome promoted the proliferation and migration of keratinocytes through Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Lv et al., 2020).

lncRNA H19 targets phosphatase and PTEN and binds to microRNA-152-3p. Li et al. loaded lncRNA H19 in mice bone marrow MSCs (BMMSCs). Exosomes containing lncRNA H19 were extracted from BMMSCs and injected into the surrounding tissues of the wound, in a mouse model of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). They found that MSC-derived exosomal lncRNA H19 prevented the apoptosis and inflammation of the fibroblasts by impairing miR-152-3p-mediated PTEN inhibition, leading to the stimulated wound-healing process in DFU (Li B. et al., 2020).

Nrf2 is involved in cell migration, proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. Li et al. transfected Nrf2 into human ADSCs. Exosomes derived from Nrf2 overexpressing ADSCs were isolated and used to treat the DFU rat model. They found that increasing the expression level of VEGFR2 and decreasing the level of inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1b, Il-6, and TNF-α and oxidative stress proteins NOX1, NOX4, and ROS resulted in improved wound healing in DFU rat model (Li et al., 2018).

In melanoma, a kind of skin cancer, BRAF siRNA (siBRAF) can effectively inhibit the invasion and metastasis of malignant cells. Lin et al. used mature dendritic cell (mDC) exosomes (mDexos) as vectors to carry siBRAF by electroporation. A melanoma mice model was established and treated by siBRAF-mDexos via subcutaneous injection. They showed significantly enhanced anti-malignant melanoma activity and a high level of safety in vivo. Moreover, siBRAF-mDexos were examined on B16-F10 cells in vitro and found to significantly inhibit melanoma growth by promoting T cell proliferation (Lin et al., 2023).

3 Exosomes for small molecule drug delivery in skin diseases

Despite the excellent therapeutic benefits of small molecule drugs in skin diseases, their low solubility, in vivo instability, short half-life, and poor oral bioavailability have limited their potential as a clinical therapeutic (Yadav et al., 2024). Exosomes hold great promise as an effective drug delivery vehicle in the treatment of skin diseases (Sharma and Mukhopadhyay, 2024). They can deliver desired therapeutic payloads with enhanced bioavailability, improved drug stability, reduced drug dose, be specific-targeted, and pass across many physical barriers through surface modification (Ortega et al., 2021; Joorabloo and Liu, 2023). These features render exosomes highly suitable for the treatment of various skin diseases. Exosomes have been demonstrated to promote angiogenesis and upregulate anti-inflammatory factors; thus, exosome-based drug delivery systems have been extensively studied in skin inflammation, psoriasis, wound healing, and melanoma (Table 2) (Hou et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2023; Jonoush et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024).

TABLE 2.

Application of exosomes for small molecule drug delivery in skin diseases.

Source of exosomes Loaded cargo Loading method In vitro/in vivo models Administration routs Results Ref
A-431 TFC Incubation, freeze-thaw, probe sonication, and ultrasonic bath In vivo: imiquimod-induced psoriasis mice model Topical Less cytotoxicity in vitro, higher suppression of the expression of TNFα, IL-23, IL-6, and IL-15 genes, and better therapeutic effect in vivo compared to free drug Dehghani et al. (2024)
Mice J774A.1 Albumin and curcumin Mild probe sonication In vivo: imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like and LPS-triggered inflammation in rat and mice model Applied manually and held in place for 10 min using a finger Improvement of stability in vitro, reduction of inflammation protein compared to free drug Yerneni et al. (2022)
RAW264.7 Curcumin In vitro: HUVEC
In vivo: diabetic wound rat model
Subcutaneous Promotion of proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis of HUVECs and acceleration of wound healing in vivo Li et al. (2023)
BMMSCs ATV-pre treated In vitro: HUVEC
In vivo: STZ-induced diabetic rats
Subcutaneous Improvement of proliferation, migration, and VEGF expression of HUVEC and acceleration of wound regeneration in vivo Yu et al. (2020)
BMMSCs PGZ-pretreated In vitro: HUVEC
In vivo: STZ-induced diabetic rats
Subcutaneous Enhancement of the migration, tube formation, and VEGF expression in HUVEC and enhancement of the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs-derived exosomes and acceleration of diabetic wound healing in vivo Hu et al. (2021)
Bovine milk Hesperidin Probe sonication In vitro: B16F10
In vivo: B16F10-induced melanoma in Swiss mice
Oral and intraperitoneal Enhancement of the half-life and therapeutic efficacy of hesperidin -loaded exosomes in both in vitro and in vivo Kumar et al. (2024)
- Adriamycin Incubation In vitro: A375 or WM266-4 cells
In vivo: mice model of melanoma
Intravenous Exhibition of good biocompatibility in vitro, accumulation in the tumor more than free exosomes, and showed the lowest tumor weight in vivo Chen et al. (2023a)
UCMSCs TP Incubation In vitro: A375 and HaCaT cells
In vivo: mice model of melanoma
Intravenous Inhibition of proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis promotion in vitro, excellent melanoma-targeting ability, and prolonged half-life of TP in vivo Gu et al. (2022)
B16.F10 Dox Incubation In vitro: B16.F10
In vivo: the B16.F10 melanoma-bearing mice
Intravenous Exhibition of higher inhibitory effects on the proliferation in vitro and a stronger antitumor efficacy in vivo Patras et al. (2022)
B16.F10 Dox Incubation In vitro: B16F10
In vivo: the B16.F10 melanoma-bearing mice
Intravenous Exhibition of strong antiproliferative effect on tumor cells co-cultured with TAMs by administration of IL-13-LCL-SIM and PEG-EV-Dox Negrea et al. (2022)
B16.F10 Dox Sonication and Incubation In vitro: B16F10
In vivo: the B16.F10 melanoma-bearing mice
Intravenous Enhancement of the therapeutic activity of Dox in vitro and suppression of tumor development with low systematic toxicity in vivo Kang et al. (2020)
RAW264.7 TP Mild ultrasonic In vitro: A375
In vivo: the B16.F10 melanoma-bearing mice
Intravenous Enhancement of the targetability of exosomes and induced tumor cell apoptosis by specifically binding to DR5 in melanoma mice models Jiang et al. (2021)

Abbreviations: TFC, tofacitinib; TNFα, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha; IL-23, Interleukin 23; IL-6, Interleukin 6; IL-15, Interleukin 15; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; BMMSCs, Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; MSCs, Mesenchymal Stem Cells; ATV, atorvastatin; STZ, streptozotocin; PGZ, pioglitazone; hUCMSCs, Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells; TP, triptolide; Dox, Doxorubicin; TAMs, Tumor-Associated Macrophages; IL-13-LCL-SIM, Simvastatin incorporated in Interleukin-13-functionalized Long-Circulating Liposomes; PEG-EV, PEG-coated Extracellular Vesicles; DR5, Death Receptor 5.

Tofacitinib (TFC), as an immunosuppressive drug, is an oral inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3 leads to a multi-tiered intervention in psoriasis, with a direct impact on dysregulated keratinocytes, declines the expression of the proinflammatory cytokine, and normalizes the IL-23/Th17 axis (Tian et al., 2019). Dehghani et al. successfully designed TFC-loaded A341-derived exosomes to reduce inflammation of psoriasis in the imiquimod-induced psoriasis mice model. Moreover, a significant reduction in the cytotoxicity of TFC-loaded exosomes compared to free TFC was observed probably due to the slow release of TFC. After 24 h, topical TFC-loaded exosomes augmented the expression of the inflammatory cytokine gene involved in psoriasis and exhibited the best therapeutic effect in the imiquimod-induced psoriasis mice model (Dehghani et al., 2024).

In another study, Yerneni et al. introduced a skin-targeted delivery system based on curcumin-albumin-exosomes (CA-exosomes) using dissolvable microneedle arrays (dMNAs) to explore the synergistic impact of these drugs to suppress imiquimod-induced psoriasis- model and LPS-triggered inflammation in vivo. Compared with curcumin and curcumin-exosomes, dMNAs-delivered CA-exosomes showed the highest storage stability in vitro, suggesting the role of exosomes and dMNAs protection. Approximately 5 days after the skin inflammation in rat and mouse models, the dMNA application of CA-exosomes decreased the thickness of the skin, blocked inflammation, and downregulated inflammatory protein (Yerneni et al., 2022).

Curcumin is a natural polyphenol compound with an antiseptic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity that has the potential to treat various inflammatory diseases (Cozmin et al., 2024). In this regard, Li et al. loaded curcumin into exosomes derived from macrophages and injected subcutaneously around the wound in a diabetic wound rat model. The loaded exosomes facilitated the proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), inhibited inflammation, and reduced reactive oxygen species production. In vivo investigations revealed that curcumin-loaded exosomes increased re-epithelialization and collagen deposition, produced mature granulation tissue, and upregulated the expression of wound healing-related molecules compared with the control group (Li et al., 2023).

Moreover, exosome pre-treatment with various drugs like pioglitazone (PGZ) and atorvastatin (ATV) promoted chronic wound healing (Liu et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021). ATV, a commonly used lipophilic statin for oral lipid-lowering, has been reported to have numerous effects, including promoting angiogenesis, increasing VEGF secretion, and facilitating wound healing (El-Okaily et al., 2023). Yu et al. asserted that exosomes derived from ATV-treated BMMSCs (ATV-Exosome) provide better support for the proliferation, migration, and VEGF expression of HUVEC via AKT/iNOS signaling pathway compared to the use of non-pretreated BMMSCs. Injection of ATV-Exosome subcutaneously accelerated wound regeneration in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats by enhanced blood vessel formation compared to the controls (Yu et al., 2020). Recently, the findings showcased the potential protective role of PGZ, as an anti-diabetic medication, in inflammation and oxidative stress to facilitate tissue renovation processes. They reported the superior effects of PGZ-pretreated MSCs-derived exosomes (PGZ-Exosome) on the biological functions of HUVECs, such as tube formation, migration, VEGF expression, and wound regeneration in vitro by targeting the PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. Their findings indicated that subcutaneous injection of PGZ-Exosome in STZ-diabetic rats leads to regenerative events including VEGF and CD31 expression, ECM remodeling, and collagen deposition, suggesting angiogenesis in diabetic wound healing (Hu et al., 2021).

Hesperidin, a flavonoid found in citrus fruits, reveals various pharmacological activities, including anti-microbial, anti-cancer, anti-inflammation via apoptosis pathways, and modulation of numerous anti-inflammatory factors (Talebi et al., 2024). To this aim, Kumar et al. isolated exosomes from bovine milk and developed hesperidin-loaded exosomes in the B16F10-induced melanoma mice model. In vitro investigations on B16F10 cell lines verified higher cytotoxicity of hesperidin-loaded exosomes than free hesperidin, as supported by enhanced cellular uptake. Oral pharmacokinetics investigations showed a significant (approximately 2.5-fold) increase in half-life and oral bioavailability of hesperidin upon loading into exosomes. Hesperidin-loaded exosome intraperitoneally showed excellent anti-cancer activity compared to free hesperidin after oral administration in vivo. Notably, no histological, hematological, or biochemical toxicities were detected in hesperidin-loaded exosome-treated tumor-bearing mice (Kumar et al., 2024).

In addition, modification of exosomes with a variety of targeting ligands, stimuli-responsive, and immune evasion elements have been addressed to improve their drug delivery capability (Zhu et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022). As a traditional chemotherapy drug for treating many cancers, adriamycin (also known as Dox) is limited in treating melanoma cancer stem cells (CSCs) due to adverse effects and poor solubility (Abdel-Megeed et al., 2024). To target CD20+ melanoma CSCs, Chen et al. developed anti-CD20 aptamer-modified exosomes (ACEXO) loaded with adriamycin. They incorporated cyclic RGD (cRGD) peptide on the exosome membrane by post-insertion method and conjugated CD20 aptamer to exosome. The modified exosome differed in cytotoxicity assay, with ACEXO killing only CD20+ melanoma cells while showing proper biocompatibility with 3T3 and 293T cells. By utilizing anti-CD20 aptamer, they effectively reduced the number of tumor spheres of WM266-4 or A375 cells compared to untreated controls or ACEXO-treated groups. Interestingly, in vivo investigations on a mice tumor model indicated tumor-targeting capabilities of the intravenously administered exosome and the lowest tumor weight, implying the substantial potential of this exosome in the selective suppression of human CD20+ melanoma stem cells (Chen H. et al., 2023).

Triptolide (TP) has been established to suppress multiple tumors, such as melanoma by regulating autophagy, apoptosis, and angiogenesis (Feng et al., 2024). Gu et al. designed exosomes with conjugated cRGD motif, as the αvβ3 integrin receptor overexpressed on the tumor cells and explored their potential to promote targeted delivery of TP in melanoma-bearing mice intravenously. The synthesized cRGD-Exosome/TP remarkably suppressed invasion, proliferation, and apoptosis promotion in vitro. Moreover, the in vivo pharmacokinetics investigations showed that cRGD-Exosome/TP possessed a superior melanoma-targeting capability and sustained the half-life of TP. Finally, in vivo antitumor results revealed that cRGD-Exosome/TP significantly suppressed tumor development and extended the survival time of tumor-bearing mice (Gu et al., 2022).

Recent studies have reported the utility of functionalized exosomes based on PEG modification in the targeted delivery of Dox in B16.F10 murine melanoma. Importantly, PEGylation of exosomes offers numerous benefits such as improving systemic circulation time, solubility, stability, and permeability, however reducing immunogenicity (Gao et al., 2024). In this context, Patras et al. reported much higher inhibitory effects of Dox-loaded PEGylated exosomes (PEG-EXO-DOX) intravenously injection on the proliferation of B16F10- induced mice melanoma model. Moreover, the functionalized exosomes enhanced antitumor activity of PEG-EXO-DOX in B16.F10 murine melanoma models as well as increased BAX expression and reduced NF-κB activation compared to liposomal Dox, suggesting better prognosis of exosome-based therapy than liposomal based treatment (Patras et al., 2022). In another study, Negera et al. explored the combinational therapy with simvastatin incorporated in IL-13-functionalized long-circulating liposomes (IL-13-LCL-SIM) based on PEG-EXO-Dox can selectively target both tumor-associated macrophages and melanoma cells. Findings showed that sequential intravenous administration of IL-13-LCL-SIM and PEG-EXO-Dox had the most powerful antiproliferative outcome on melanoma cells (Negrea et al., 2022).

Kang et al. engineered a more complex platform focusing on functionalized exosome using active targeting modality consist of membrane anchor (BODIPY)-spacer (PEG)-targeting ligand (RGD), named ASL conjugate, in B16F10 melanoma tumors. The Dox-loaded ASL exosomes (dAExosome) significantly inhibited B16F10 melanoma growth. In the mice model of cancer, intravenous injection of dAExosome attained tumor-targeted imaging and effectively inhibited the tumor development with low systematic toxicity as evidenced by body weight and tumor volume (Kang et al., 2020).

Furthermore, the integration of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) into exosomes can prompt cancer cell apoptosis by binding to death receptor5 (DR5) overexpressed in cancer cells. Jiang et al. employed a targeted delivery system based on TRAIL-engineered exosomes (TRAIL-exosome) to load TP to treat malignant melanoma. TP loading into the TRAIL-exosome system improved tumor targetability and cellular uptake while inhibiting proliferation, invasion, and migration, and inducing apoptosis of A375 cells via activating the intrinsic mitochondrial and the extrinsic TRAIL pathways in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo investigations on a melanoma nude mice model indicated that injection of TRAIL-exosome-TP intravenously suppresses tumor progression capabilities, implying the promising potential of this delivery system in the treatment of malignant melanoma (Jiang et al., 2021).

4 Exosomes for delivery of proteins and growth factors in skin diseases

Deficiency of certain proteins or growth factors is an important cause of many clinical problems. Exosomes are potential natural candidates for delivering bioactive molecules such as proteins, growth factors, and peptides. There are limited investigations on applying loaded exosomes with the mentioned substances in skin diseases (Table 3). The controlled release of bioactive molecules from exosomes has been introduced as a promising strategy in wound healing. Shi et al. developed a TGF-β loaded clinical-grade platelets exosome product incorporated in an injectable surgical fibrin sealant. They found that topical treatment of ischemic wounds of rabbits with this construct leads to regenerative events including matrix remodeling, cell proliferation, and re-acquisition of accessory structures of the skin (Shi et al., 2021).

TABLE 3.

Application of exosomes for delivery of proteins and growth factors in skin diseases.

Source of exosomes Loaded cargo Loading method In vitro/in vivo model Administration route Result Ref.
Platelets TGF-β Incubation In vivo: Ischemic full-thickness wounds of rabbits Topical Regenerative events including matrix remodeling, cell proliferation, and reacquisition of accessory structures of the skin Shi et al. (2021)
Epidermal stem cells VH298 Incubation In vivo: Diabetic wound of mice Wound dressing Appropriate mechanical and biological characteristics Wang et al. (2022)
Pretreatment of BMMSCs Melatonin In vivo: Diabetic wound of mice Multisite subcutaneous injection Elevated ratio of M2 to M1 macrophage polarization and extinguished the inflammatory response Liu et al. (2020)
Pretreatment of UCMSCs 3,3′-Diindolylmethane In vivo: a deep second-degree burn injury rat model Subcutaneous Upregulation of Wnt11 which led to β-catenin activation and triggered therapeutic effects in vivo Shi et al. (2017)
RAW 264.7 TGFβRI kinase inhibitor SD-208 and a TLR-7/8 agonist resiquimod (R848) Sonication and electroporation In vitro: B16F10 cells isolated from the skin tissue of mice
In vivo: the B16F10 tumor xenograft model
Tail-vein injection Reduction of the migration of B16F10 cells and stimulation of the release of proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages and dendritic cells
Reduction of tumor growth and promotion of survival rate
Lee et al. (2022)
Tumor cell CpG-DNA Incubation In vivo: mice model of melanoma Intradermally Activation of dendritic cells
Increase in immune responses
Matsumoto et al. (2019)
B16BL6 CpG-DNA Incubation In vivo: mice model of melanoma Intradermally Activation of DC2.4 cells, promotion of tumor antigen presentation capacity, and antitumor effects Morishita et al. (2016)
HEK 293T cells PD-1 receptors/1-methyl-tryptophan Incubation Invitro: B16F10 cells
In vivo: Mice model of melanoma
Tail-vein injection Enhancement of the antitumor responses against the melanoma tumor and ability to disrupt the immune tolerance Zhang et al. (2018b)
Pretreatment of BMMSCs TRAIL Incubation In vitro: B16F0 cell lines
In vivo: Mice model of melanoma
Injection into the left flank Massive necrosis in the cancer cells, inhibition of tumor progression Shamili et al. (2018)

Abbreviations: TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; VH298, (Von Hippel-Lindau, the E3 ligase); BMMSCs, Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells; UCMSCs, Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Wnt11, Wnt Family Member 11; TGFβRI, Transforming growth factor-β receptor I; TLR, Toll-Like Receptor; DC: dendritic cells; PD-1, Programmed Cell Death 1; TRAIL, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand.

The lack of angiogenesis has been recognized as the main cause of diabetic wound healing complications. A recent study demonstrated that delivering VH298 into endothelial cells by exosomes derived from epidermal stem cells improves the function of the human HUVEC in vitro (Wang et al., 2022). VH298 is a small molecule designed by Frost et al. for stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) (Frost et al., 2016). Applying a mixture of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and VH298 loaded in exosomes on diabetic wounds showed appropriate mechanical and biological characteristics. This study suggested this construct is a beneficial wound dressing (Wang et al., 2022).

Moreover, exosome pre-treatment with small molecules like melatonin and 3,3′-Diindolylmethane could effectively ameliorate chronic and acute wound healing (Shi et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020). In this regard, multisite subcutaneous injection of melatonin-pretreated MSC-derived exosomes represented beneficial effects on diabetic wound healing. Investigation of the underlying mechanism revealed the role of the PTEN/AKT signaling pathway in the elevated ratio of M2 to M1 macrophage polarization and subsequently extinguished the inflammatory response (Liu et al., 2020). Additionally, the subcutaneous administration of 3,3′-Diindolylmethane-pretreated hUCMSCs exosomes in a deep second-degree burn injury rat model improved the healing capacity of cells. This study indicated that these exosomes upregulated Wnt11, leading to β-catenin activation and triggering therapeutic effects in vivo (Shi et al., 2017). These reports showed that the prime of MSCs with these bioactive molecules results in the release of exosomes with elevated wound healing ability.

In melanoma, the RAW 264.7-derived exosomes were loaded by the transforming growth factor-β receptor I (TGFβRI) kinase inhibitor SD-208 and a toll-like receptor (TLR)-7/8 agonist resiquimod (R848). Findings showed that the exosomes loaded with SD-208 decreased the migration of B16F10 cells isolated from the skin tissue of a mouse with melanoma. Moreover, the exosomes loaded with R848 stimulated the release of proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages and dendritic cells. The in vivo study revealed that the combination of dual-loaded exosomes through the tail-vein injection resulted in the reduction of tumor growth and promotion of survival rate in the B16F10 tumor xenograft model (Lee et al., 2022). In addition, immunostimulatory CpG-DNA loaded in exosomes seems to be an effective strategy in the immunotherapy of melanoma. Researchers constructed a CpG-DNA anchored tumor cell-derived exosomes in this regard. They found that this structure effectively activated dendritic cells in vitro and increased immune responses when injected intradermally into the mice (Matsumoto et al., 2019). Furthermore, intradermally murine melanoma B16BL6-derived exosomes along with CpG-DNA could efficiently activate DC2.4 cells and promote tumor antigen presentation capacity. The in vivo administration of this engineered construct in B16BL6 tumor-bearing mice exhibited antitumor effects (Morishita et al., 2016).

In utilizing exosomes in cancer therapy, the engineered cellular nanovesicles presenting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptors were applied. In this regard, B16F10 cells were transfected with EGFP-PD-L1 plasmid and then incubated with PD-1 nanovesicles. The administration of the produced nanovesicles through the tail-vein of mice model of melanoma indicated that this strategy enhanced antitumor responses against the melanoma tumor by disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory axis. On the other hand, by loading 1-methyl-tryptophan, an inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, into these engineered cellular nanovesicles their ability was enhanced to disrupt the immune tolerance pathway (Zhang X. et al., 2018). In cancer therapy, researchers also examined the effect of the exosomes derived from TRAIL--engineered MSCs in tumor activity in a melanoma model. They found that injection of these exosomes into the left flank of the mice leads to massive necrosis in the cancer cells which can inhibit tumor progression (Shamili et al., 2018).

5 Challenges, future ahead, and conclusion

Skin diseases include a wide range of diseases from self-limited and benign to malignant and divesting conditions. Due to the complex conditions of each disease, dermatologists face different challenges for targeted treatment (Shao et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021b; Yu et al., 2024). Exosomes have unique properties like stability, minimal immune response, and strong biocompatibility, making them excellent vehicles for drug delivery. These attributes allow exosomes to efficiently penetrate target cells, evading detection and clearance by the immune system, and thus facilitating the delivery of foreign small molecules, protein, and nucleic acid medications to specific cells (Zeng et al., 2023). Exosomes can enhance drug efficacy by enhancing drug solubility and facilitating the simultaneous delivery of multiple drugs, thanks to their lipid bilayer structure with both lipophilic and hydrophilic properties (Zeng et al., 2023). The studies reviewed in this manuscript demonstrated that the exogenous cargoes loaded and transferred through exosomes can help in the treatment of many skin problems such as AD, psoriasis, skin wounds, and melanoma. A wide range of drugs from microRNAs to small molecules drugs such as curcumin, tofacitinib, triptolide, etc. to proteins such as TGF-β and melatonin were loaded into exosomes and used to treat skin problems (Figure 3). The loading methods used for genes often included electroporation and transfection with lipofectamine, while for small molecules and proteins, incubation methods were often used. Furthermore, to load genetic factors, the mother cell preloading method was frequently employed, and then exosomes containing the loaded cargo from modified cells were extracted and applied. While post-loading methods were used to load small molecule drugs, proteins, and growth factors. In addition, different methods of administering cargo-loaded exosomes were utilized in the studies on skin diseases, which complicates the standardization of exosome delivery approaches, making it difficult to achieve consistent therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the reviewed studies alongside varying administration methods, lack consistent mention of the quantity of drug and exosomes used, and the extreme heterogeneity in experimental methodologies, including differences in dosage, tracking techniques, and exosome isolation methods, make it challenging to compare findings across studies. Nonetheless, the majority of studies indicate that delivering cargo via exosomes yielded superior results compared to administering the free drug alone for skin problems.

Although the delivery of varied bioactive molecules seems very promising for dermatological applications, there are multiple challenging issues in this field such as adequate efficiency, targeting specificity, and systemic circulation time. New research is trying to solve these problems, including specific targeting and therapeutic efficacy because the poor organ-targeting ability of exosomes led to decreased treatment efficacy and will limit their therapeutic applications. Recently, loading the exosomes by targeting magnetic nanoparticles captured the interest of the researchers. Studies showed that iron oxide nanoparticles-labeled exosomes enhance wound healing (Li X. et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Indeed iron oxide increased the exosome accumulation at the wound site, and improved endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation while reducing scar formation and enhancing collagen deposition (Li X. et al., 2020). Therefore, exosomes modified with magnetic targeting nanoparticles may serve as a potential tool for therapeutic purposes. In addition, modification of exosomes with a variety of targeting ligands, stimuli-responsive, and immune evasion elements have been addressed to improve their drug delivery capability (Zhu et al., 2021; Fan et al., 2022). Recently, the method of surface functionalization with aptamer has been used to increase the targeting power of exosomes containing Dox in the treatment of melanoma mouse models (Chen H. et al., 2023). Furthermore, the use of PEG modification of functionalized exosomes in the targeted delivery of Dox in melanoma mouse models has been reported (Patras et al., 2022; Gao et al., 2024). Indeed, PEGylation of exosomes offers numerous benefits such as regulation of their pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, and improving circulation of blood half-time (Ferreira et al., 2022).

As a result, exosomes show significant potential as a successful method for delivering drugs to treat skin conditions. Although the practical application of exosomes as a drug delivery vehicle in skin diseases is still in its infancy, there is optimism regarding the potential clinical applications of exosomes in dermatology. Nevertheless, further research is required to elucidate the therapeutic effects of loaded exosomes on skin diseases.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Author contributions

SK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. ZA: Writing – original draft. HN: Writing – original draft. MH: Writing – original draft. MK: Writing – original draft. FS: Writing – original draft. AT: Writing – review and editing. MS: Writing – review and editing. NH: Writing – review and editing. NA: Writing – review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

AD

Atopic dermatitis

ADSCs

Adipose-derived stem cells

AKT

Protein kinase B

ATV

Atorvastatin

ACEXO

Anti-CD20 aptamer-modified exosomes

BAX

Bcl-2-associated X protein

BMMSCs

Bone marrow MSCs

CARD10

Caspase recruitment domain protein 10

CA-exosomes

Curcumin-albumin-exosomes

CD31

Cluster of differentiation 31

CSCs

Cancer stem cells

cRGD

cyclic RGD peptide

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

DFU

Diabetic foot ulcer

dMNAs

Dissolvable microneedle arrays

Dox

Adriamycin/Doxorubicin

dAExosome

Dox-loaded ASL exosomes

DR5

Death receptor5

ECM

Extracellular matrix

GelMA

Gelatin methacrylate

hAMSCs

Human amnion MSCs

hUCMSCs

Human umbilical cord MSCs

HUVECs

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

HIF-1α

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α

HaCaT

Human keratinocyte cell line

iNOS

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

JAK

Janus kinase

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

LATS2

Large tumor suppressor factor 2

IL

Interleukin

lncRNA H19

Long noncoding RNA H19

IL-13-LCL-SIM

Simvastatin incorporated in IL-13-functionalized long-circulating liposomes

MSCs

Mesenchymal stem cells

miRNA:

MicroRNA

MEF2A

Myocyte enhancer factor 2A

mRNA

Messenger RNA

mDC

Mature dendritic cell

mDexos

mature dendritic cell exosomes

NOX

NADPH Oxidase

NF-κB

Nuclear factor kappa B

Nrf2

Nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2

PEG

Polyethylene glycol

PGZ

Pioglitazone

PI3K

Phosphoinositide-3-kinase

PEG-EXO-DOX

Dox-loaded PEGylated exosomes

PD-1 receptors

Programmed cell death protein one receptors

PTEN

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SEC

Size exclusion chromatography

siRNA

Small interfering RNA

SMSCs

Synovial MSCs

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

siBRAF

BRAF siRNA

STZ

Streptozotocin

TSLP

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin

TLR4

Toll-like receptor 4

TGF-β

Transforming growth factor beta

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TFC

Tofacitinib

Th17

T helper 17

Tp

Triptolide

TRAIL

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

TGFβRI

Transforming growth factor-β receptor I

VEGFR2

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGFA

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

VH298:

Von Hippel-Lindau, the E3 ligase.

References

  1. Abdel-Megeed R. M., Ghanem H. Z., Kadry M. O. (2024). Alleviation of doxorubicin adverse effects via loading into various drug-delivery systems: a comparative study. Ther. Deliv. 15, 413–426. 10.4155/tde-2023-0121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akuma P., Okagu O. D., Udenigwe C. C. (2019). Naturally occurring exosome vesicles as potential delivery vehicle for bioactive compounds. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 23. 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand V., Gupta S., Koundal D. (2022). “Skin disease diagnosis: challenges and opportunities,” in Proceedings of second doctoral symposium on computational intelligence: DoSCI 2021 (Springer; ), 449–459. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aqil F., Munagala R., Jeyabalan J., Agrawal A. K., Gupta R. (2017). Exosomes for the enhanced tissue bioavailability and efficacy of curcumin. AAPS J. 19, 1691–1702. 10.1208/s12248-017-0154-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arntz O. J., Pieters B. C., Oliveira M. C., Broeren M. G., Bennink M. B., De Vries M., et al. (2015). Oral administration of bovine milk derived extracellular vesicles attenuates arthritis in two mouse models. Mol. Nutr. and food Res. 59, 1701–1712. 10.1002/mnfr.201500222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baeza A., Ruiz-Molina D., Vallet-Regí M. (2017). Recent advances in porous nanoparticles for drug delivery in antitumoral applications: inorganic nanoparticles and nanoscale metal-organic frameworks. Expert Opin. drug Deliv. 14, 783–796. 10.1080/17425247.2016.1229298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bellavia D., Raimondo S., Calabrese G., Forte S., Cristaldi M., Patinella A., et al. (2017). Interleukin 3-receptor targeted exosomes inhibit in vitro and in vivo Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia cell growth. Theranostics 7, 1333–1345. 10.7150/thno.17092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen H., Jiang Y., Li X. (2023a). Adriamycin‐loaded exosome with anti‐CD20 aptamers selectively suppresses human CD20+ melanoma stem cells. Skin Res. Technol. 29, e13259. 10.1111/srt.13259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen M., Wu M., Yaling Z., Zeng M., (2023b). Effect of MicroRNA-146a modified adipose-derived stem cell exosomes on rat back wound healing. J. of Lower Extremity Wound. 22, 704–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cozmin M., Lungu I. I., Gutu C., Stefanache A., Duceac L. D., Șoltuzu B. D., et al. (2024). Turmeric: from spice to cure. A review of the anti-cancer, radioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of turmeric sourced compounds. Front. Nutr. 11, 1399888. 10.3389/fnut.2024.1399888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Das C. K., Jena B. C., Banerjee I., Das S., Parekh A., Bhutia S. K., et al. (2018). Exosome as a novel shuttle for delivery of therapeutics across biological barriers. Mol. Pharm. 16, 24–40. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dehghani P., Varshosaz J., Mirian M., Minaiyan M., Kazemi M., Bodaghi M. (2024). Keratinocyte exosomes for topical delivery of tofacitinib in treatment of psoriasis: an in vitro/in vivo study in animal model of psoriasis. Pharm. Res. 41, 263–279. 10.1007/s11095-023-03648-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Duan L., Xu L., Xu X., Qin Z., Zhou X., Xiao Y., et al. (2021). Exosome-mediated delivery of gene vectors for gene therapy, Nanoscale, 13 , 1387–1397. 10.1039/d0nr07622h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Okaily M. S., Mostafa A. A., Dulnik J., Denis P., Sajkiewicz P., Mahmoud A. A., et al. (2023). Nanofibrous polycaprolactone membrane with bioactive glass and atorvastatin for wound healing: preparation and characterization. Pharmaceutics 15, 1990. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Escrevente C., Keller S., Altevogt P., Costa J. (2011). Interaction and uptake of exosomes by ovarian cancer cells. BMC cancer 11, 108–110. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fan Z., Jiang C., Wang Y., Wang K., Marsh J., Zhang D., et al. (2022). Engineered extracellular vesicles as intelligent nanosystems for next-generation nanomedicine. Nanoscale horizons 7, 682–714. 10.1039/d2nh00070a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng K., Li X., Bai Y., Zhang D., Tian L. (2024). Mechanisms of cancer cell death induction by triptolide: a comprehensive overview. Heliyon 10, e24335. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferreira D., Moreira J. N., Rodrigues L. R. J. C. R. I. O. H. (2022). New advances in exosome-based targeted drug delivery systems, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 172 , 103628, 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frost J., Galdeano C., Soares P., Gadd M. S., Grzes K. M., Ellis L., et al. (2016). Potent and selective chemical probe of hypoxic signalling downstream of HIF-α hydroxylation via VHL inhibition. Nat. Commun. 7, 13312. 10.1038/ncomms13312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gao J., Karp J. M., Langer R., Joshi N. (2023). The future of drug delivery. Chem. Mater. 35 (2), 359–363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao S., Chen T., Hao Y., Zhang F., Tang X., Wang D., et al. (2020). Exosomal miR-135a derived from human amnion mesenchymal stem cells promotes cutaneous wound healing in rats and fibroblast migration by directly inhibiting LATS2 expression. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11, 56–11. 10.1186/s13287-020-1570-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao Y., Joshi M., Zhao Z., Mitragotri S. (2024). PEGylated therapeutics in the clinic. Bioeng. and Transl. Med. 9, e10600. 10.1002/btm2.10600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ge L., Wang K., Lin H., Tao E., Xia W., Wang F., et al. (2023). Engineered exosomes derived from miR-132-overexpresssing adipose stem cells promoted diabetic wound healing and skin reconstruction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1129538. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1129538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilligan K. E., Dwyer R. M. (2017). Engineering exosomes for cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1122. 10.3390/ijms18061122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gondaliya P., Sayyed A. A., Bhat P., Mali M., Arya N., Khairnar A., et al. (2022). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes loaded with miR-155 inhibitor ameliorate diabetic wound healing. Mol. Pharm. 19, 1294–1308. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gu Y., Du Y., Jiang L., Tang X., Li A., Zhao Y., et al. (2022). αvβ3 integrin-specific exosomes engineered with cyclopeptide for targeted delivery of triptolide against malignant melanoma. J. nanobiotechnology 20, 384. 10.1186/s12951-022-01597-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gurung S., Perocheau D., Touramanidou L., Baruteau J. (2021). The exosome journey: from biogenesis to uptake and intracellular signalling. Cell Commun. Signal. 19, 47. 10.1186/s12964-021-00730-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hou C., Wu Q., Xu L., Cui R., Ou R., Li D., et al. (2022). Exploiting the potential of extracellular vesicles as delivery vehicles for the treatment of melanoma. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1054324. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1054324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu Y., Tao R., Chen L., Xiong Y., Xue H., Hu L., et al. (2021). Exosomes derived from pioglitazone-pretreated MSCs accelerate diabetic wound healing through enhancing angiogenesis. J. nanobiotechnology 19, 150. 10.1186/s12951-021-00894-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang X.-Y., Huang Z.-L., Huang J., Xu B., Huang X.-Y., Xu Y.-H., et al. (2020). Exosomal circRNA-100338 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via enhancing invasiveness and angiogenesis. J. Exp. and Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 20–16. 10.1186/s13046-020-1529-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang L., Gu Y., Du Y., Tang X., Wu X., Liu J. (2021). Engineering exosomes endowed with targeted delivery of triptolide for malignant melanoma therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 13, 42411–42428. 10.1021/acsami.1c10325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jonoush Z. A., Mahdavi R., Farahani M., Zeinali F., Shayan E., Amari A. (2024). The implications of exosomes in psoriasis: disease: emerging as new diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Mol. Biol. Rep. 51, 465. 10.1007/s11033-024-09449-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Joorabloo A., Liu T. (2023). Engineering exosome-based biomimetic nanovehicles for wound healing. J. Control. Release 356, 463–480. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang C., Han P., Lee J. S., Lee D., Kim D. (2020). Anchor, spacer, and ligand-modified engineered exosomes for trackable targeted therapy. Bioconjugate Chem. 31, 2541–2552. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kang M., Jordan V., Blenkiron C., Chamley L. W. (2021). Biodistribution of extracellular vesicles following administration into animals: a systematic review. J. Extracell. vesicles 10, e12085. 10.1002/jev2.12085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kar R., Dhar R., Mukherjee S., Nag S., Gorai S., Mukerjee N., et al. (2023). Exosome-based smart drug delivery tool for cancer theranostics. ACS biomaterials Sci. and Eng. 9, 577–594. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Keshtkar S., Azarpira N., Ghahremani M. H. J. S. C. R. (2018). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: novel frontiers in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 63–69. 10.1186/s13287-018-0791-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Keshtkar S., Kaviani M., Soleimanian S., Azarpira N., Asvar Z., Pakbaz S. J. F. I. M. (2022a). Stem cell-derived exosome as potential therapeutics for microbial diseases. Front. Microbiol. 12, 786111. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Keshtkar S., Soleimanian S., Kaviani M., Sarvestani F. S., Azarpira N., Asvar Z., et al. (2022b). Immune cell-derived extracellular vesicles in the face of pathogenic infections. Front. Immunol. 13, 906078. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.906078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Khafaji M., Zamani M., Golizadeh M., Bavi O. (2019). Inorganic nanomaterials for chemo/photothermal therapy: a promising horizon on effective cancer treatment. Biophys. Rev. 11, 335–352. 10.1007/s12551-019-00532-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim H., Jang H., Cho H., Choi J., Hwang K. Y., Choi Y., et al. (2021a). Recent advances in exosome-based drug delivery for cancer therapy. Cancers 13, 4435. 10.3390/cancers13174435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim H., Lee J. W., Han G., Kim K., Yang Y., Kim S. H. J. P. (2021b). Extracellular vesicles as potential theranostic platforms for skin diseases and aging. Pharmaceutics 13, 760. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim H., Wang S. Y., Kwak G., Yang Y., Kwon I. C., Kim S. H. (2019). Exosome‐guided phenotypic switch of M1 to M2 macrophages for cutaneous wound healing. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900513. 10.1002/advs.201900513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim M. S., Haney M. J., Zhao Y., Mahajan V., Deygen I., Klyachko N. L., et al. (2016). Development of exosome-encapsulated paclitaxel to overcome MDR in cancer cells. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 12, 655–664. 10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kim Y.-K. J. C. M. J. (2020). RNA therapy: current status and future potential, 56, 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kimiz-Gebologlu I., Oncel S. S. (2022). Exosomes: large-scale production, isolation, drug loading efficiency, and biodistribution and uptake. J. Control. Release 347, 533–543. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kooijmans S., Fliervoet L., Van Der Meel R., Fens M., Heijnen H., En Henegouwen P. V. B., et al. (2016). PEGylated and targeted extracellular vesicles display enhanced cell specificity and circulation time. J. Control. Release 224, 77–85. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar D. N., Chaudhuri A., Dehari D., Gamper A. M., Kumar D., Agrawal A. K. (2024). Enhanced therapeutic efficacy against melanoma through exosomal delivery of hesperidin. Mol. Pharm. 21, 3061–3076. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee J. H., Song J., Kim I. G., You G., Kim H., Ahn J.-H., et al. (2022). Exosome-mediated delivery of transforming growth factor-β receptor 1 kinase inhibitors and toll-like receptor 7/8 agonists for combination therapy of tumors. Acta Biomater. 141, 354–363. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li B., Luan S., Chen J., Zhou Y., Wang T., Li Z., et al. (2020a). The MSC-derived exosomal lncRNA H19 promotes wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by upregulating PTEN via MicroRNA-152-3p, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids, 19 , 814–826. 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li D., Zhang C., Gao Z., Xia N., Wu C., Liu C., et al. (2023). Curcumin-loaded macrophage-derived exosomes effectively improve wound healing. Mol. Pharm. 20, 4453–4467. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li X., Liu L., Yang J., Yu Y., Chai J., Wang L., et al. (2016). Exosome derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell mediates MiR-181c attenuating burn-induced excessive inflammation, EBioMedicine, 8, 72–82. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li X., Wang Y., Shi L., Li B., Li J., Wei Z., et al. (2020b). Magnetic targeting enhances the cutaneous wound healing effects of human mesenchymal stem cell-derived iron oxide exosomes. J. nanobiotechnology 18, 113–114. 10.1186/s12951-020-00670-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Li X., Xie X., Lian W., Shi R., Han S., Zhang H., et al. (2018). Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells overexpressing Nrf2 accelerate cutaneous wound healing by promoting vascularization in a diabetic foot ulcer rat model, 50, 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liang G., Zhu Y., Ali D. J., Tian T., Xu H., Si K., et al. (2020). Engineered exosomes for targeted co-delivery of miR-21 inhibitor and chemotherapeutics to reverse drug resistance in colon cancer. J. nanobiotechnology 18, 10–15. 10.1186/s12951-019-0563-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liao K., Niu F., Dagur R. S., He M., Tian C., Hu G. (2020). Intranasal delivery of lincRNA-Cox2 siRNA loaded extracellular vesicles decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial proliferation in mice. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 15, 390–399. 10.1007/s11481-019-09864-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lin J., Huang N., Li M., Zheng M., Wang Z., Zhang X., et al. (2023). Dendritic cell-derived exosomes driven drug co-delivery biomimetic nanosystem for effective combination of malignant melanoma immunotherapy and gene therapy, 2087–2106. Development, and Therapy. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu W., Yu M., Xie D., Wang L., Ye C., Zhu Q., et al. (2020). Melatonin-stimulated MSC-derived exosomes improve diabetic wound healing through regulating macrophage M1 and M2 polarization by targeting the PTEN/AKT pathway. Stem cell Res. and Ther. 11, 1–15. 10.1186/s13287-020-01756-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu X., Lu Y., Xu Y., Hou S., Huang J., Wang B., et al. (2019). Exosomal transfer of miR-501 confers doxorubicin resistance and tumorigenesis via targeting of BLID in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 459, 122–134. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Longevity O. J. O. M., Longevity C. (2023). Retracted: miR-124-3p delivered using exosomes attenuates the keratinocyte response to IL-17a stimulation in psoriasis, 9876751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lv Q., Deng J., Chen Y., Wang Y., Liu B., Liu J. J. M. P. (2020). Engineered human adipose stem-cell-derived exosomes loaded with miR-21-5p to promote diabetic cutaneous wound healing. Mol. Pharm. 17, 1723–1733. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ma J., Zhang Z., Wang Y., Shen H. J. E. D. (2022). Investigation of miR-126-3p loaded on adipose stem cell-derived exosomes for wound healing of full-thickness skin defects, Exp. Dermatol., 31 , 362–374. 10.1111/exd.14480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Matsumoto A., Takahashi Y., Ariizumi R., Nishikawa M., Takakura Y. (2019). Development of DNA-anchored assembly of small extracellular vesicle for efficient antigen delivery to antigen presenting cells. Biomaterials 225, 119518. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mattos B. D., Rojas O. J., Magalhães W. L. (2017). Biogenic silica nanoparticles loaded with neem bark extract as green, slow-release biocide. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 4206–4213. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Min Y., Caster J. M., Eblan M. J., Wang A. Z. (2015). Clinical translation of nanomedicine. Chem. Rev. 115, 11147–11190. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Mittelbrunn M., Sánchez-Madrid F. (2012). Intercellular communication: diverse structures for exchange of genetic information. Nat. Rev. Mol. cell Biol. 13, 328–335. 10.1038/nrm3335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Miyanishi M., Tada K., Koike M., Uchiyama Y., Kitamura T., Nagata S. (2007). Identification of Tim4 as a phosphatidylserine receptor. Nature 450, 435–439. 10.1038/nature06307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Morelli A. E., Larregina A. T., Shufesky W. J., Sullivan M. L., Stolz D. B., Papworth G. D., et al. (2004). Endocytosis, intracellular sorting, and processing of exosomes by dendritic cells. Blood 104, 3257–3266. 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Morishita M., Takahashi Y., Matsumoto A., Nishikawa M., Takakura Y. (2016). Exosome-based tumor antigens–adjuvant co-delivery utilizing genetically engineered tumor cell-derived exosomes with immunostimulatory CpG DNA. Biomaterials 111, 55–65. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Negrea G., Rauca V.-F., Meszaros M. S., Patras L., Luput L., Licarete E., et al. (2022). Active tumor-targeting nano-formulations containing simvastatin and doxorubicin inhibit melanoma growth and angiogenesis. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 870347. 10.3389/fphar.2022.870347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nojehdehi S., Soudi S., Hesampour A., Rasouli S., Soleimani M., Hashemi S. M. (2018). Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cell–derived exosomes on experimental type‐1 autoimmune diabetes. J. Cell. Biochem. 119, 9433–9443. 10.1002/jcb.27260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Obeid M. A., Al Qaraghuli M. M., Alsaadi M., Alzahrani A. R., Niwasabutra K., Ferro V. A. (2017). Delivering natural products and biotherapeutics to improve drug efficacy. Ther. Deliv. 8, 947–956. 10.4155/tde-2017-0060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ortega A., Martinez-Arroyo O., Forner M. J., Cortes R. (2021). Exosomes as drug delivery systems: endogenous nanovehicles for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Pharmaceutics 13, 3. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Pascucci L., Coccè V., Bonomi A., Ami D., Ceccarelli P., Ciusani E., et al. (2014). Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: a new approach for drug delivery. J. Control. release 192, 262–270. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Patras L., Ionescu A. E., Munteanu C., Hajdu R., Kosa A., Porfire A., et al. (2022). Trojan horse treatment based on PEG-coated extracellular vesicles to deliver doxorubicin to melanoma in vitro and in vivo . Cancer Biol. and Ther. 23, 1–16. 10.1080/15384047.2021.2003656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Prada I., Meldolesi J. (2016). Binding and fusion of extracellular vesicles to the plasma membrane of their cell targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1296. 10.3390/ijms17081296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Qiu X., Liu J., Zheng C., Su Y., Bao L., Zhu B., et al. (2020). Exosomes released from educated mesenchymal stem cells accelerate cutaneous wound healing via promoting angiogenesis. Cell Prolif. 53, e12830. 10.1111/cpr.12830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sarkar T., Sarkar S., Gangopadhyay D. N. J. I. J. O. D. (2020). Gene therapy and its application in dermatology, Indian J. dermatol., 65 , 341–350. 10.4103/ijd.IJD_323_20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sato Y. T., Umezaki K., Sawada S., Mukai S.-A., Sasaki Y., Harada N., et al. (2016). Engineering hybrid exosomes by membrane fusion with liposomes. Sci. Rep. 6, 21933. 10.1038/srep21933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shamili F. H., Bayegi H. R., Salmasi Z., Sadri K., Mahmoudi M., Kalantari M., et al. (2018). Exosomes derived from TRAIL-engineered mesenchymal stem cells with effective anti-tumor activity in a mouse melanoma model. Int. J. Pharm. 549, 218–229. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shao S., Fang H., Li Q., Wang G. J. T. (2020). Extracellular vesicles in inflammatory skin disorders: from pathophysiology to treatment, Theranostics, 10 , 9937, 9955. 10.7150/thno.45488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sharma V., Mukhopadhyay C. D. (2024). Exosome as drug delivery system: current advancements. Extracell. Vesicle 3, 100032. 10.1016/j.vesic.2023.100032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Shi A., Li J., Qiu X., Sabbah M., Boroumand S., Huang T.C.-T., et al. (2021). TGF-β loaded exosome enhances ischemic wound healing in vitro and in vivo . Theranostics 11, 6616–6631. 10.7150/thno.57701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Shi C., Pei S., Ding Y., Tao C., Zhu Y., Peng Y., et al. (2023). Exosomes with overexpressed miR 147a suppress angiogenesis and infammatory injury in an experimental model of atopic dermatitis. Sci. Rep. 13, 8904. 10.1038/s41598-023-34418-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Shi H., Xu X., Zhang B., Xu J., Pan Z., Gong A., et al. (2017). 3, 3′-Diindolylmethane stimulates exosomal Wnt11 autocrine signaling in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells to enhance wound healing. Theranostics 7, 1674–1688. 10.7150/thno.18082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Shi L., Song D., Meng C., Cheng Y., Wang B., Yang Z. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of engineered exosomes for diabetic wound healing. Giant 18, 100251. 10.1016/j.giant.2024.100251 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sukhanova A., Bozrova S., Sokolov P., Berestovoy M., Karaulov A., Nabiev I. (2018). Dependence of nanoparticle toxicity on their physical and chemical properties. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13, 44–21. 10.1186/s11671-018-2457-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sun D., Zhuang X., Xiang X., Liu Y., Zhang S., Liu C., et al. (2010). A novel nanoparticle drug delivery system: the anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin is enhanced when encapsulated in exosomes. Mol. Ther. 18, 1606–1614. 10.1038/mt.2010.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sun X., Shan A., Wei Z., Xu B. (2018). Intravenous mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate myocardial inflammation in the dilated cardiomyopathy. Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun. 503, 2611–2618. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Svensson K. J., Christianson H. C., Wittrup A., Bourseau-Guilmain E., Lindqvist E., Svensson L. M., et al. (2013). Exosome uptake depends on ERK1/2-heat shock protein 27 signaling and lipid Raft-mediated endocytosis negatively regulated by caveolin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17713–17724. 10.1074/jbc.M112.445403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Talebi S. F., Kooshki A., Zarein M., Seify M., Dolatshahi B., Shoorei H., et al. (2024). Protective effect of hesperidin on malathion-induced ovarian toxicity in mice: the role of miRNAs, inflammation, and apoptosis. Toxicol. Rep. 12, 469–476. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tao S.-C., Guo S.-C., Li M., Ke Q.-F., Guo Y.-P., Zhang C.-Q. (2017). Chitosan wound dressings incorporating exosomes derived from MicroRNA-126-overexpressing Synovium mesenchymal stem cells provide sustained release of exosomes and heal full-thickness skin defects in a diabetic rat model, Stem Cells Transl. Med., 6 , 736–747. 10.5966/sctm.2016-0275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tian F., Chen Z., Xu T. (2019). Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Int. Med. Res. 47, 2342–2350. 10.1177/0300060519847414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Tian T., Wang Y., Wang H., Zhu Z., Xiao Z. (2010). Visualizing of the cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of exosomes by live‐cell microscopy. J. Cell. Biochem. 111, 488–496. 10.1002/jcb.22733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang J., Chen D., Ho E. A. (2021). Challenges in the development and establishment of exosome-based drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 329, 894–906. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wang L., Abhange K. K., Wen Y., Chen Y., Xue F., Wang G., et al. (2019). Preparation of engineered extracellular vesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with ultrasonication for skin rejuvenation. ACS omega 4, 22638–22645. 10.1021/acsomega.9b03561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang Y., Cao Z., Wei Q., Ma K., Hu W., Huang Q., et al. (2022). VH298-loaded extracellular vesicles released from gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel facilitate diabetic wound healing by HIF-1α-mediated enhancement of angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 147, 342–355. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Watkins R., Wu L., Zhang C., Davis R. M., Xu B. (2015). Natural product-based nanomedicine: recent advances and issues. Int. J. nanomedicine 10, 6055–6074. 10.2147/IJN.S92162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wu D., Kang L., Tian J., Wu Y., Liu J., Li Z., et al. (2020). Exosomes derived from bone mesenchymal stem cells with the stimulation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and static magnetic field enhance wound healing through upregulated miR-21-5p. Int. J. nanomedicine 15, 7979–7993. 10.2147/IJN.S275650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Xi X.-M., Xia S.-J., Lu R. (2021). Drug loading techniques for exosome-based drug delivery systems. Die Pharmazie-An Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 76, 61–67. 10.1691/ph.2021.0128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Xu M., Yang Q., Sun X., Wang Y. (2020). Recent advancements in the loading and modification of therapeutic exosomes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 586130. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.586130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Yadav K., Sahu K. K., Yadav R., Raza W., Minz S., Singh M. R., et al. (2024). A complex molecular landscape to drug delivery concept for achieving precise therapy in psoriasis. Med. Drug Discov. 22, 100183. 10.1016/j.medidd.2024.100183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Yerneni S. S., Yalcintas E. P., Smith J. D., Averick S., Campbell P. G., Ozdoganlar O. B. (2022). Skin-targeted delivery of extracellular vesicle-encapsulated curcumin using dissolvable microneedle arrays. Acta Biomater. 149, 198–212. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Yu H., Feng H., Zeng H., Wu Y., Zhang Q., Yu J., et al. (2024). Exosomes: the emerging mechanisms and potential clinical applications in dermatology, Int. J. Biol. Sci., 20 , 1778, 1795. 10.7150/ijbs.92897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Yu M., Liu W., Li J., Lu J., Lu H., Jia W., et al. (2020). Exosomes derived from atorvastatin-pretreated MSC accelerate diabetic wound repair by enhancing angiogenesis via AKT/eNOS pathway. Stem cell Res. and Ther. 11, 1–17. 10.1186/s13287-020-01824-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Yuan R., Dai X., Li Y., Li C., Liu L. J. M. M. R. (2021). Exosomes from miR-29a-modified adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce excessive scar formation by inhibiting TGF-β2/Smad3 signaling, 24, 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zeng H., Guo S., Ren X., Wu Z., Liu S., Yao X. J. C. (2023). Current strategies for exosome cargo loading and targeting delivery, Cells, 12 , 1416, 10.3390/cells12101416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhang H., Wang Y., Bai M., Wang J., Zhu K., Liu R., et al. (2018a). Exosomes serve as nanoparticles to suppress tumor growth and angiogenesis in gastric cancer by delivering hepatocyte growth factor si RNA. Cancer Sci. 109, 629–641. 10.1111/cas.13488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zhang X., Wang C., Wang J., Hu Q., Langworthy B., Ye Y., et al. (2018b). PD‐1 blockade cellular vesicles for cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707112. 10.1002/adma.201707112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhao H., Li Z., Wang Y., Zhou K., Li H., Bi S., et al. (2023). Bioengineered MSC-derived exosomes in skin wound repair and regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1029671. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1029671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhou M., Weber S. R., Zhao Y., Chen H., Sundstrom J. M. (2020). Methods for exosome isolation and characterization. Exosomes, 23–38. 10.1016/b978-0-12-816053-4.00002-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhu M., Li S., Li S., Wang H., Xu J., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Strategies for engineering exosomes and their applications in drug delivery. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 17, 2271–2297. 10.1166/jbn.2021.3196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhuang X., Xiang X., Grizzle W., Sun D., Zhang S., Axtell R. C., et al. (2011). Treatment of brain inflammatory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain. Mol. Ther. 19, 1769–1779. 10.1038/mt.2011.164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES